pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31727 · v1 · pith:Y47BNR7Ynew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Focal Plate Prototyping for Modular Focal Planes of Stage-5 Instruments For Ground-Based Telescopes

Maxime Rombach , Jean-David Perriard , Laurent Chevalley , Diane Chapuis , Markus Thurneysen , Jean-Paul Kneib This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords focal plateprototyping5-axes machiningmulti-object spectroscopyStage-5 instrumentsfiber positionerstelescope focal planeinstrumentation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A focal plate prototype shows 5-axes machining meets the tilt and focus tolerances for Stage-5 telescope instruments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes the design and testing of a focal plate prototype that holds fiber positioners, guide-focus-alignment cameras, and wavefront sensors on the curved focal surface of a telescope. It claims that 5-axes machining produces a structure stiff and light enough while staying within 0.05 degrees of tilt and 30 micrometers of focus error. This matters for Stage-5 instruments that target around 20,000 fibers, because the plate must keep all components aligned to the telescope optics without adding excessive mass. The work positions the prototype as a step toward modular focal planes that go beyond current Stage-4 systems.

Core claim

The presented focal plate prototype shows that 5-axes machining is promising to meet the desired tolerances of typically 0.05 degrees in tilt and 30 micrometers in focus while remaining optimized for stiffness and mass.

What carries the argument

5-axes machining of the focal plate structure to hold fiber positioners, GFAs, and wavefront sensors on the telescope focal surface.

If this is right

  • The plate can maintain fiber positioners, GFAs, and wavefront sensors together on the focal surface.
  • Modular focal planes become feasible for instruments with around 20,000 fibers.
  • The structure satisfies stiffness and mass requirements while meeting alignment tolerances.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the machining method scales, it could allow faster iteration on focal plane designs for different telescopes.
  • Validation under full operational loads including thermal and vibration effects remains a necessary next step.

Load-bearing premise

The prototype's measured performance will translate without degradation to the integrated full-scale focal plane that includes all fiber positioners, GFAs, and wavefront sensors under operational conditions.

What would settle it

A measurement on the completed full-scale focal plane assembly showing tilt errors above 0.05 degrees or focus errors above 30 micrometers under telescope-like conditions would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31727 by Diane Chapuis, Jean-David Perriard, Jean-Paul Kneib, Laurent Chevalley, Markus Thurneysen, Maxime Rombach.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Modular focal plane concept and triangular module concept [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Possible focal plane layout with the given parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the plate main design principles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cut view of the plate in the middle With all those challenges in mind the mechanical workshop of the EPFL Physics Institute manufactured this plate from a raw block of 550x550x130 mm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the focal plate manufacturing process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Overview of the focal plate measuring process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Module numbering from 1 to 34 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Overview of the module support faces nominal angles with respect to z and their manufacturing errors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Overview of the module support faces nominal angles with respect to z and their manufacturing errors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fiducials numbering from 1 to 13 The fiducials support faces tilt and focus errors are calculated in an identical manner as previously for the modules. (a) Fiducials support faces angular error (b) Fiducials support faces focus error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Overview of the fiducials support faces tilt and focus errors alongside tolerance envelopes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As current Stage-4 multi-object instruments such as SDSS-V, DESI, MOONS or 4MOST are providing astrophysicists data to study the objects of the Universe, effort is arising to build the next generation of Stage-5 multi-object focal planes; aiming for 20'000 fibers-class instruments. The focal plate structure is a central element of the future focal plane assemblies. It maintains the fiber positioners, the Guide, Focus and Alignment cameras (GFAs) and wave-front sensors together on the focal surface of the telescope. In addition to being optimized for stiffness and mass, the plate needs to meet tight tolerances in tilt, typically pm 0.05 degres, and focus, typically, pm 30 um, to match the telescope's curved focal surface. The presented focal plate prototype shows that 5-axes machining is promising to meet the desired tolerances.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the design and 5-axis CNC machining of a prototype focal plate intended for modular focal planes in Stage-5 ground-based multi-object instruments. It asserts that this prototype demonstrates the feasibility of achieving the required tolerances of ±0.05° tilt and ±30 µm focus to match the telescope's curved focal surface while supporting fiber positioners, GFAs, and wavefront sensors.

Significance. A validated fabrication route for stiff, low-mass focal plates meeting these tolerances at scale would directly enable 20,000-fiber-class instruments, extending the engineering approach of current Stage-4 systems. The result, if supported by data, would be a practical contribution to instrument design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The abstract and any results discussion assert that the prototype meets the stated tolerances, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative metrology data, error budgets, measurement methods, or direct comparison against requirements. This leaves the central claim without visible supporting evidence.
  2. The prototype test configuration omits the full complement of fiber positioners, GFAs, and wavefront sensors. The manuscript does not examine whether the reported tolerances remain valid once these components are mounted, under operational thermal, gravitational, or mounting loads; any differential stiffness or distortion would directly impact the tolerance budget.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains typographical errors: 'pm 0.05 degres' should read '±0.05 degrees'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight areas where the manuscript can be clarified and strengthened. We address each major comment below and outline the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] The abstract and any results discussion assert that the prototype meets the stated tolerances, yet the manuscript supplies no quantitative metrology data, error budgets, measurement methods, or direct comparison against requirements. This leaves the central claim without visible supporting evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim of feasibility requires explicit supporting data. The prototype was inspected post-machining, but the submitted manuscript emphasized the design and 5-axis process description rather than presenting the metrology results in detail. We will add a new Results section that includes the quantitative CMM measurements, the error budget breakdown, the measurement methods employed, and a direct comparison against the ±0.05° tilt and ±30 µm focus requirements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The prototype test configuration omits the full complement of fiber positioners, GFAs, and wavefront sensors. The manuscript does not examine whether the reported tolerances remain valid once these components are mounted, under operational thermal, gravitational, or mounting loads; any differential stiffness or distortion would directly impact the tolerance budget.

    Authors: The work focuses on demonstrating that 5-axis machining can produce a bare focal plate meeting the geometric tolerances as a foundational step. We acknowledge that the effects of mounted components and environmental loads are critical for the complete system. We will expand the Discussion section to include a preliminary finite-element analysis of expected stiffness contributions from the positioners and sensors, along with a clear statement that full loaded testing under thermal and gravitational conditions is planned for subsequent development phases. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical prototype paper with no derivations or self-referential modeling

full rationale

The manuscript describes fabrication and metrology of a physical focal-plate prototype using 5-axis machining. No equations, parameter fits, predictions derived from models, or self-citations appear in the provided text or abstract. The central claim—that the prototype meets ±0.05° tilt and ±30 µm focus tolerances—rests directly on measured hardware performance rather than any reduction to fitted inputs or prior author results. The integration concern raised by the skeptic is an external-validity issue, not a circularity issue. The derivation chain is empty; the result is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is an empirical engineering prototype report. It introduces no mathematical model, free parameters, axioms, or new physical entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5707 in / 994 out tokens · 69989 ms · 2026-07-01T02:53:51.076278+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Derwent, Mark A

    Pogge, Richard W. and Derwent, Mark A. and O'Brien, Thomas P. and Jurgenson, Colby A. and Pappalardo, Daniel and Engelman, Michael and Brandon, Christopher and Brady, Julia and Clawson, Nicholas and Shover, Jon and Mason, Jerry and Kneib, Jean-Paul and Araujo, Ricardo and Bouri, Mohamed and Kronig, Luzius and Grossen, Loïc and Gillet, Denis and Macktoobia...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2561113

  2. [2]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , author =

    Focal. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.5.1.014003 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.5.1.014003 2019

  3. [3]

    and Brinchmann, Jarle and et al

    Mainieri, Vincenzo and Anderson, Richard I. and Brinchmann, Jarle and et al. , month = apr, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.05398 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.05398

  4. [4]

    , month = may, year =

    Besuner, Robert and Dey, Arjun and Drlica-Wagner, Alex and et al. , month = may, year =. The. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.07923 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.07923

  5. [5]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , author =

    From. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , author =. 2025 , note =. doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2725-3 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2725-3 2025

  6. [6]

    , year =

    Diestel, R. , year =. Graph

  7. [7]

    2025 , note =

    Wikipedia , author =. 2025 , note =

    2025

  8. [8]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad45fe , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad45fe 2024

  9. [9]

    Developing an integrated concept for the

    Rodrigues, Myriam and Dalton, Gavin and Fitzsimons, Ewan and Chemla, Fanny and Morris, Tim and Hammer, Francois and Puech, Mathieu and Evans, Christopher and Jagourel, Pascal , month = aug, year =. Developing an integrated concept for the. doi:10.1117/12.2232562 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2232562

  10. [10]

    and Blanton, Michael R

    Sayres, Conor and Sánchez-Gallego, José R. and Blanton, Michael R. and Engelman, Michael and Finkbeiner, Douglas P. and Hogg, David W. and Holtzman, Jon A. and Jurgenson, Colby and Pogge, Richard W. and Ramírez, Solange and Saydjari, Andrew K. and Schlafly, Edward F. and Tuttle, Sarah , month = aug, year =. Ground-based and. doi:10.1117/12.2630507 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2630507

  11. [11]

    Leitner, Daniela and Aguilar, Jessica and Ameel, Jon and Besuner, Robert and Claybaugh, Todd and Heetderks, Henry and Schubnell, Michael and Kneib, Jean-Paul and Silber, Joseph and Tarlé, Gregory and Weaverdyck, Curtis and Zhang, Kai , year =. Dark. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1807.09907 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.09907

  12. [12]

    and Gershkovich, Irena and Hoerler, Philipp and Kneib, Jean-Paul and Heetderks, Henry D

    Schubnell, Michael and Ameel, Jon and Besuner, Robert W. and Gershkovich, Irena and Hoerler, Philipp and Kneib, Jean-Paul and Heetderks, Henry D. and Silber, Joseph H. and Tarlé, Gregory and Weaverdyck, Curtis , month = aug, year =. The. Ground-based and. doi:10.1117/12.2233370 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2233370

  13. [13]

    arXiv.org , author =

    Dark. arXiv.org , author =

  14. [14]

    Prototyping of 6.2-mm-Pitch Fiber Positioner Modules for Stage-V Telescope Instrumentation

    Galal, Malak and Rombach, Maxime and Wei, Jonathan and et al. , month = apr, year =. Prototyping of 6.2-mm-. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.19711 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.19711

  15. [15]

    Fiber optic throughput performance evaluation in multi-fiber termination connectors , volume =

    Farr, Emily and Tuttle, Sarah and Wilson, John and Pahuja, Rishi and Mandeville, Travis and Jurgenson, Colby and Kadlec, Kal and Wachter, Stefanie and Ramirez, Solange , month = aug, year =. Fiber optic throughput performance evaluation in multi-fiber termination connectors , volume =. Ground-based and. doi:10.1117/12.2629751 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2629751

  16. [16]

    Fusion splicing: a novel approach to fiber connections for the

    Fagrelius, Parker and Poppett, Claire and Edelstein, Jerry , month = aug, year =. Fusion splicing: a novel approach to fiber connections for the. Ground-based and. doi:10.1117/12.2231331 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231331

  17. [17]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    Overview of the. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  18. [18]

    and Bebek, Christopher and Bramall, D

    Poppett, Claire and Tyas, Luke and Aguilar, J. and Bebek, Christopher and Bramall, D. and Claybaugh, T. and Edelstein, J. and Fagrelius, P. and Heetderks, H. and Jelinsky, P. and Jelinsky, S. and Lafever, Robin and Lambert, A. and Lampton, M. and Levi, Michael E. and Martini, P. and Rockosi, C. and Schmoll, J. and Sharples, Ray M. and Sirk, Martin and Wis...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad76a4

  19. [19]

    and Wang, Adeline and Bryant, Julia , month = aug, year =

    Sathi, Zinat M. and Wang, Adeline and Bryant, Julia , month = aug, year =. Optimizing fibre connectors for high throughput and low. Advances in. doi:10.1117/12.3017730 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3017730

  20. [20]

    FS.com , author =

    1m (3ft). FS.com , author =

  21. [21]

    Schmoll, Jurgen , year =

  22. [22]

    and Cuby, Jean-Gabriel and Dubbeldam, Marc and Evans, Christopher and Fusco, Thierry and Jagourel, Pascal and Myers, Richard M

    Morris, Simon L. and Cuby, Jean-Gabriel and Dubbeldam, Marc and Evans, Christopher and Fusco, Thierry and Jagourel, Pascal and Myers, Richard M. and Parr-Burman, Phil and Rousset, Gerard and Schnetler, Hermine , editor =. The. 2012 , pages =. doi:10.1117/12.925889 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.925889 2012

  23. [23]

    2010 , note =

    The Messenger , author =. 2010 , note =

    2010

  24. [24]

    , month = aug, year =

    Gonzalez, Oscar and Cirasuolo, Michele and Taylor, William and et al. , month = aug, year =. Ground-based and. doi:10.1117/12.2629932 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2629932

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Fibre assignment in next-generation wide-field spectrographs , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2012 , note =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19774.x , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19774.x 2012

  26. [26]

    Gajewski, Paul and Żurek, Dominik and Pietroń, Marcin and Faber, Kamil , month = oct, year =. Solving. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.06347 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06347

  27. [27]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Fault. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acfd02 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acfd02 2023

  28. [28]

    Advanced Intelligent Systems , author =

    Long. Advanced Intelligent Systems , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1002/aisy.202300703 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202300703 2024

  29. [29]

    Frontiers in Robotics and AI , author =

    Swarm-. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , author =. doi:10.3389/frobt.2017.00012 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2017.00012 2017

  30. [30]

    Fan, Tingxiang and Long, Pinxin and Liu, Wenxi and Pan, Jia , month = aug, year =. Fully. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1808.03841 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.03841

  31. [31]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.06656 , abstract =

    Guo, Yicheng and Liu, Jiaqi and Yu, Rongjie and Hang, Peng and Sun, Jian , month = aug, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.06656 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.06656

  32. [32]

    Zhang, Kaiqing and Yang, Zhuoran and Liu, Han and Zhang, Tong and Başar, Tamer , month = feb, year =. Fully. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1802.08757 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08757

  33. [33]

    and Koenig, Sven and Fioretto, Ferdinando , month = jun, year =

    Liang, Jinhao and Christopher, Jacob K. and Koenig, Sven and Fioretto, Ferdinando , month = jun, year =. Simultaneous. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.03607 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.03607

  34. [34]

    and Baierl, Mark and Koert, Dorothea and Peters, Jan , month = mar, year =

    Carvalho, Joao and Le, An T. and Baierl, Mark and Koert, Dorothea and Peters, Jan , month = mar, year =. Motion. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2308.01557 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.01557

  35. [35]

    Complex System Modeling and Simulation , author =

    Distributed. Complex System Modeling and Simulation , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.23919/CSMS.2022.0017 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.23919/csms.2022.0017 2022

  36. [36]

    IFAC-PapersOnLine , author =

    Hierarchical hybrid control for. IFAC-PapersOnLine , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.093 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.093 2019

  37. [37]

    Introduction to Graph Neural Networks for Machine Learning Engineers

    Tanis, James H. and Giannella, Chris and Mariano, Adrian V. , month = dec, year =. Introduction to. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.19419 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.19419

  38. [38]

    The Astronomical Journal , author =

    The. The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9ab1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9ab1 2023

  39. [39]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.00134 , abstract =

    Andreychuk, Anton and Yakovlev, Konstantin and Panov, Aleksandr and Skrynnik, Alexey , month = apr, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.00134 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.00134

  40. [40]

    2021 , note =

    The Astronomical Journal , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd0f2 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd0f2 2021

  41. [41]

    Goeckner, Anthony and Sui, Yueyuan and Martinet, Nicolas and Li, Xinliang and Zhu, Qi , month = mar, year =. Graph. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.13093 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.13093

  42. [42]

    Biasi, Roberto and Gallieni, Daniele and Briguglio, Runa and Vernet, Elise and Andrighettoni, Mario and Angerer, Gerald and Pescoller, Dietrich and Manetti, Mauro and Tintori, Matteo and Mantegazza, Marco and Lazzarini, Paolo and Fumi, Pierluigi and Anaclerio, Vincenzo and Xompero, Marco and Pariani, Giorgio and Riccardi, Armando and Cayrel, Marc and Dier...

    work page doi:10.20353/k3t4cp1131718

  43. [43]

    and Ishizuka, Yuki and Kamata, Yukiko and Allaoui, Ali and Arai, Akira and Arnouts, Stéphane and Barette, Rudy and Barkhouser, Robert H

    Tamura, Naoyuki and Yabe, Kiyoto and Koshida, Shintaro and Moritani, Yuki and Tanaka, Masayuki and Ishigaki, Miho N. and Ishizuka, Yuki and Kamata, Yukiko and Allaoui, Ali and Arai, Akira and Arnouts, Stéphane and Barette, Rudy and Barkhouser, Robert H. and Bergeron, Eddie and Blanchard, Patrick and Caplar, Neven and Carle, Michael and Chabaud, Pierre-Yve...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3015967 2024

  44. [44]

    The Adaptive Mirror for the E-ELT , author =

    The. The Adaptive Mirror for the E-ELT , author =. doi:10.12839/AO4ELT3.13431 , language =

    work page doi:10.12839/ao4elt3.13431

  45. [45]

    Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Fiber Positioner Thermal and Wind Disturbance Test

    Zhang, Kai and Silber, Joseph H. and Heetderks, Henry D. and Leitner, Daniela and Schubnell, Michael and Levi, Michael and Wang, Gradey and Fanning, Kevin and Fagrelius, Parker and Dobson, Carl and Aguilar, Jessica , year =. Dark. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1807.09383 , abstract =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.09383

  46. [46]

    and Kollmeier, Juna A

    Schlegel, David J. and Kollmeier, Juna A. and Aldering, Greg and Bailey, Stephen and Baltay, Charles and Bebek, Christopher and BenZvi, Segev and Besuner, Robert and Blanc, Guillermo and Bolton, Adam S. and Bonaca, Ana and Bouri, Mohamed and Brooks, David and Buckley-Geer, Elizabeth and Cai, Zheng and Crane, Jeffrey and Demina, Regina and DeRose, Joseph a...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.04322

  47. [47]

    and Schlegel, David J

    Silber, Joseph H. and Schlegel, David J. and Araujo, Ricardo and Baltay, Charles and Besuner, Robert W. and Farr, Emily and Guy, Julien and Kneib, Jean-Paul and Poppett, Claire and Mandeville, Travis A. and Schubnell, Michael and Thurneysen, Markus and Tuttle, Sarah , month = dec, year =. 25,000 optical fiber positioning robots for next-generation cosmolo...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.07908

  48. [48]

    and Galal, Malak and Schlegel, David and Kneib, Jean-Paul , editor =

    Rombach, Maxime and Xu, Xiangyu and Araujo, Ricardo and Thurneysen, Markus and Caseiro, Stefane and Magnenat, Corentin and Silber, Joseph H. and Galal, Malak and Schlegel, David and Kneib, Jean-Paul , editor =. Investigations on assembly and coverage for modular focal planes of multiplexed telescopes , url =. Ground-based and. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1117/...

    work page doi:10.1117/12.3018315 2024

  49. [49]

    , month = jan, year =

    Ramsey, Lawrence W. , month = jan, year =. Focal ratio degradation in optical fibers of astronomical interest. , volume =

  50. [50]

    Ethernet to multi-

    Gutierrez, Pablo and Atkinson, David and Beard, Steven and Di Lieto, Nicola , editor =. Ethernet to multi-. Software and. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1117/12.2557215 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2557215 2020

  51. [51]

    Sphinx: a massively multiplexed fiber positioner for

    Smedley, Scott and Baker, Gabriella and Brown, Rebecca and Gilbert, James and Gillingham, Peter and Saunders, Will and Sheinis, Andrew and Venkatesan, Sudharshan and Waller, Lewis , editor =. Sphinx: a massively multiplexed fiber positioner for. Ground-based and. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1117/12.2310021 , urldate =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2310021 2018