pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00014 · v1 · pith:QYYTL4SMnew · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.IM· physics.ed-ph

The Fleeting Laboratory: An Experimental Guide for Total Solar Eclipses

Suprit Singh , Bharti Arora This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 00:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.IMphysics.ed-ph
keywords total solar eclipsessolar coronaground-based observationshigh-resolution imagingdata calibrationimage processingsolar atmosphere
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ground-based eclipse experiments complement space-based solar observatories with high-resolution data in spatial, temporal, and spectral domains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that total solar eclipses function as fleeting natural laboratories for studying the Sun's faint outer atmosphere. It shows how these brief windows have driven past discoveries and continue to supply data that complements and calibrates space-based observations through superior resolution. The guide details the use of modern equipment, detectors, and computational processing to extract useful results from the short period of totality. This approach connects historical precedents with current research practices.

Core claim

Ground-based eclipse experiments provide crucial data that complements and calibrates our space-based solar observatories, and offer high-resolution capabilities in the spatial, temporal as well as spectral domains.

What carries the argument

The experimental guide for deploying modern observing equipment, detectors, and advanced image and data processing techniques during the brief duration of totality.

If this is right

  • High spatial resolution images of the corona become available to reveal fine structural details.
  • Direct comparisons allow calibration of instruments on space missions.
  • Spectral measurements during totality can probe temperature and composition properties of the corona.
  • Temporal sequences captured on the ground can track dynamic changes missed by space platforms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Repeated eclipse campaigns could build time-series datasets across multiple events for long-term corona studies.
  • The methods might extend to coordinated observations with other ground facilities for multi-wavelength coverage.
  • Publicly shared processing pipelines from the guide could enable consistent data reduction across different teams.

Load-bearing premise

Modern observing equipment, detectors, and computational techniques can be deployed and operated effectively within the extremely short duration of totality to yield scientifically useful results.

What would settle it

An eclipse observation campaign that applies the guide's recommended equipment and processing methods yet produces no data with measurable resolution or calibration advantages over existing space observatory outputs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00014 by Bharti Arora, Suprit Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Olden Records from the Total Solar Eclipses [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Moments during the Total Solar on April 08, 2024 captured at Dallas, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A world map depicting the tracks of solar eclipses for the period of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Brightness profile of the solar corona. Licensed under CC BY-SA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Since times immemorial, total solar eclipses have inspired awe and wonder. In the modern scientific era they have transformed into exclusive natural laboratories, offering fleeting but invaluable opportunities to study the Sun's faint outer atmosphere otherwise obscured by the intense glare of the photosphere. This unique vantage point has enabled revolutionary discoveries, from the identification of the element Helium and the first empirical validation of Einstein's General Relativity, to deciphering the corona's surprisingly high temperature. This legacy of discovery continues. Today, ground-based eclipse experiments provide crucial data that complements and calibrates our space-based solar observatories, and offer high-resolution capabilities in the spatial, temporal as well as spectral domains. This chapter serves as a comprehensive guide detailing how to leverage modern observing equipments, detectors, and advanced computational techniques in image and data processing to conduct meaningful scientific investigations, bridging the gap between historical precedent and cutting-edge research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an instructional guide for conducting scientific observations during total solar eclipses. It reviews the historical role of eclipses in discoveries such as helium identification and GR validation, then argues that ground-based experiments today complement space-based solar observatories by delivering high-resolution data in spatial, temporal, and spectral domains. The guide details the use of modern equipment, detectors, and computational image/data processing techniques to enable meaningful investigations within the brief totality window.

Significance. If the described procedures prove practical, the guide could help solar physicists better exploit eclipse opportunities to calibrate and extend space-based datasets, potentially enabling new high-resolution studies of the corona. However, the absence of supporting metrics or examples limits its assessed impact on the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'modern observing equipments, detectors, and advanced computational techniques' can be deployed to yield 'high-resolution capabilities in the spatial, temporal as well as spectral domains' during totality rests on the untested premise that complex setups fit inside the few-minute window; no timing budgets, post-2010 eclipse case studies with achieved resolution numbers, or overhead estimates are supplied to anchor this.
  2. [Overall manuscript] Overall structure (instructional guide): the feasibility of fielding and operating the described instruments and pipelines without prohibitive setup/calibration/data-volume costs is load-bearing for the claim that such experiments 'provide crucial data that complements and calibrates' space observations, yet the manuscript supplies no failure-mode analysis or quantitative validation of successful operation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight opportunities to strengthen the practical anchoring of our instructional guide. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to provide additional concrete examples and feasibility details while preserving the manuscript's focus as a how-to resource for eclipse observers.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that 'modern observing equipments, detectors, and advanced computational techniques' can be deployed to yield 'high-resolution capabilities in the spatial, temporal as well as spectral domains' during totality rests on the untested premise that complex setups fit inside the few-minute window; no timing budgets, post-2010 eclipse case studies with achieved resolution numbers, or overhead estimates are supplied to anchor this.

    Authors: We agree the abstract claim would be more robust with explicit support. Although the guide draws on established modern techniques, we will revise the abstract for precision and add a dedicated subsection (e.g., in Section 2 or a new 'Practical Implementation' section) that includes sample timing budgets for typical detector and instrument setups, overhead estimates for calibration and data acquisition, and references to post-2010 eclipse campaigns reporting achieved spatial/temporal/spectral resolutions. These additions will be drawn from published eclipse observations to anchor the claims without introducing new primary data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Overall manuscript] Overall structure (instructional guide): the feasibility of fielding and operating the described instruments and pipelines without prohibitive setup/calibration/data-volume costs is load-bearing for the claim that such experiments 'provide crucial data that complements and calibrates' space observations, yet the manuscript supplies no failure-mode analysis or quantitative validation of successful operation.

    Authors: The manuscript is framed as an instructional guide rather than an empirical report, so its emphasis is on procedures rather than exhaustive validation metrics. We acknowledge that explicit discussion of feasibility strengthens the complementarity claim. We will add a new section on 'Field Deployment Considerations' that includes quantitative estimates of setup/calibration times, data-volume management strategies, and a failure-mode analysis with mitigation approaches (e.g., weather contingencies, equipment redundancy, and pipeline robustness), supported by references to successful recent eclipse experiments. This will address the load-bearing aspects while keeping the core instructional tone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: instructional guide lacks derivations, equations, or self-referential claims

full rationale

The manuscript is presented as a comprehensive guide on leveraging modern equipment for eclipse observations, with no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains. The abstract and described content establish historical context and state the value of ground-based data without reducing any claim to the paper's own inputs or self-citations. No load-bearing steps match the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no mathematical model, free parameters, or new physical entities; the work is purely methodological.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5685 in / 983 out tokens · 20770 ms · 2026-07-03T00:09:54.090798+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Golub, J.M

    L. Golub, J.M. Pasachoff,The Solar Corona, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Golub, J.M

    L. Golub, J.M. Pasachoff,Nearest star : the surprising science of our sun(2001)

    2001

  3. [3]

    Held,Eclipses: 2005–2017: A Handbook of Solar and Lunar Eclipses and Other Rare Astronomical Events(Floris Books, Edinburgh, 2005)

    W. Held,Eclipses: 2005–2017: A Handbook of Solar and Lunar Eclipses and Other Rare Astronomical Events(Floris Books, Edinburgh, 2005). Translated from the German workAstronomische Sternstunden, published by Verlag Freies Geistesleben, 2005

    2005

  4. [4]

    Vaquero, M

    J.M. Vaquero, M. Vázquez,The Sun Recorded Through History: Scientific Data Extracted from Historical Documents,Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol. 361 (Springer, New York, 2009)

    2009

  5. [5]

    Guillermier, S

    P. Guillermier, S. Koutchmy,Total Eclipses: Science, Observations, Myths and Leg- ends(Springer/Praxis, London, 1999). Translated by Pierre Guillermier from the French workEclipses Totales: Histoire, Découvertes, Observations(Masson, 1998)

    1999

  6. [6]

    Espenak, J

    F. Espenak, J. Meeus,Five millennium canon of solar eclipses : -1999 to +3000 (2000 BCE to 3000 CE)(2006)

    1999

  7. [7]

    M.L. Todd. Solar eclipse 1715May03-Cambridge England. Image from Total Eclipses of the Sun(1894). Retrieved from Wikimedia Commons (1894). URL:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Solar_eclipse_ 1715May03-Cambridge_England.png[Public Domain]

  8. [8]

    E. Halley. A description of the passage of the shadow of the moon, over england. Broadside map (1715). Map published for the total solar eclipse of 1715 May 3 (Julian calendar 22 April)

  9. [9]

    Cook, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society37, 349 (1996)

    A. Cook, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society37, 349 (1996)

    1996

  10. [10]

    Johnston,School Atlas of Astronomy: Comprising, in Twenty-one Plates, a Complete Series of Illustrations of the Heavenly Bodies(William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh, 1869)

    A.K. Johnston,School Atlas of Astronomy: Comprising, in Twenty-one Plates, a Complete Series of Illustrations of the Heavenly Bodies(William Blackwood and Sons, Edinburgh, 1869)

  11. [11]

    Stephenson,Historical Eclipses and Earth’s Rotation(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    F.R. Stephenson,Historical Eclipses and Earth’s Rotation(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  12. [12]

    Zirin,Astrophysics of the Sun(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)

    H. Zirin,Astrophysics of the Sun(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988)

    1988

  13. [13]

    Foukal,Solar Astrophysics, 2nd edn

    P. Foukal,Solar Astrophysics, 2nd edn. (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2004)

    2004

  14. [14]

    Aschwanden,Physics of the Solar Corona: An Introduction with Problems and Solutions(Praxis Publishing, Chichester, UK, 2009)

    M.J. Aschwanden,Physics of the Solar Corona: An Introduction with Problems and Solutions(Praxis Publishing, Chichester, UK, 2009). 3rd printing

    2009

  15. [15]

    Pasachoff, Nature459(7248), 789 (2009)

    J.M. Pasachoff, Nature459(7248), 789 (2009). DOI 10.1038/nature07987. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07987

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07987 2009

  16. [16]

    Ozkan, et al., inModern Solar Facilities–Advanced Solar Science, ed

    M.T. Ozkan, et al., inModern Solar Facilities–Advanced Solar Science, ed. by F. Kneer, K.G. Puschmann, A.D. Wittmann (Universitätsverlag Göttingen, Göt- tingen, 2007), pp. 201–204

    2007

  17. [17]

    Crelinsten,Einstein’s Jury: The Race to Test Relativity(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006)

    J. Crelinsten,Einstein’s Jury: The Race to Test Relativity(Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006)

    2006

  18. [18]

    Dyson, A.S

    F.W. Dyson, A.S. Eddington, C. Davidson, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A220, 291 (1920). DOI 10.1098/rsta.1920.0009

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009 1920

  19. [19]

    Evans, K.I

    D.S. Evans, K.I. Winget,Harlan’s Globetrotters: The Story of an Eclipse(2005)

    2005

  20. [20]

    J.81, 452 (1976)

    Texas Mauritanian Eclipse Team, Astron. J.81, 452 (1976). DOI 10.1086/111906

    work page doi:10.1086/111906 1976

  21. [21]

    Dittrich, D.G

    W.A. Dittrich, D.G. Bruns, R. Berry, K. Carrell, D. Smith, A.D.P. Smith, D.Borrero-Echeverry,G.Kinne,J.M.Izen,H.Hill,G.Mulder,J.J.Rembold,C.Del- gado, A.E. Hornbeck, S.A. Jeffe, J.R. McSorley, O.E. Schutz, M. Strate, E. Matin, The Fleeting Laboratory: An Experimental Guide for Total Solar Eclipses 15 J. Kinder, P. Poncy, C. Freels, J. Benitez-Flores, R. S...

    work page doi:10.3847/25c2cfeb.7f092727 2025

  22. [22]

    Goldoni, L

    E. Goldoni, L. Stefanini, Physics Education55(4), 045009 (2020). DOI 10.1088/ 1361-6552/ab8778. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088%2F1361-6552%2Fab8778

    2020

  23. [23]

    Muhleman, R.D

    D.O. Muhleman, R.D. Ekers, E.B. Fomalont, Physical Review Letters24(24), 1377 (1970). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.24.1377

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.24.1377 1970

  24. [24]

    Pasachoff, B.A

    J.M. Pasachoff, B.A. Babcock, K.D. Russell, D.B. Seaton, Solar Physics207(2), 241 (2002). DOI 10.1023/A:1016297800478

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1016297800478 2002

  25. [25]

    Van Doorsselaere, V.M

    T. Van Doorsselaere, V.M. Nakariakov, E. Verwichte, The Astrophysical Journal Letters676(1), L73 (2008). DOI 10.1086/587029

    work page doi:10.1086/587029 2008

  26. [26]

    Pasachoff, V

    J.M. Pasachoff, V. Rušin, M. Druckmüller, M. Saniga, Astrophys. J.665(1), 824 (2007). DOI 10.1086/519680

    work page doi:10.1086/519680 2007

  27. [27]

    Koutchmy, M

    S. Koutchmy, M. Belmahdi, R.L. Coulter, P. Demoulin, V. Gaizauskas, R.M. MacQueen, G. Monnet, J. Mouette, J.C. Noens, L.J. November, Astron. Astro- phys.281(1), 249 (1994)

    1994

  28. [28]

    Rušin, M

    V. Rušin, M. Druckmüller, M. Minarovjech, M. Saniga, Astrophysics and Space Science313(4), 345 (2008). DOI 10.1007/s10509-007-9686-2. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1007/s10509-007-9686-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-007-9686-2 2008

  29. [29]

    Rušin, et al., inTransactions of the American Geophysical Union(2008), Fall Meeting

    V. Rušin, et al., inTransactions of the American Geophysical Union(2008), Fall Meeting. Abstract SH13B-1524

    2008

  30. [30]

    Mikić, C

    Z. Mikić, C. Downs, J.A. Linker, R.M. Caplan, D.H. Mackay, L.A. Upton, P. Ri- ley, R. Lionello, T. Török, V.S. Titov, J. Wijaya, M. Druckmüller, J.M. Pasachoff, W. Carlos, Nature Astronomy2(11), 913 (2018). DOI 10.1038/s41550-018-0562-5. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0562-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0562-5 2018

  31. [31]

    Klimchuk, Solar Physics234(1), 41 (2006)

    J.A. Klimchuk, Solar Physics234(1), 41 (2006). DOI 10.1007/s11207-006-0055-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-006-0055-z 2006

  32. [32]

    Williams, inSOHO 13—Waves, Oscillations and Small-Scale Transient Events in the Solar Atmosphere: A Joint View from SOHO and TRACE, ed

    D.R. Williams, inSOHO 13—Waves, Oscillations and Small-Scale Transient Events in the Solar Atmosphere: A Joint View from SOHO and TRACE, ed. by H. Lacoste, ESA SP-547 (European Space Agency (ESA) Publications Division, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2004), pp. 513–518

    2004

  33. [33]

    Cowsik, J

    R. Cowsik, J. Singh, A.K. Saxena, R. Srinivasan, A.V. Raveendran, Solar Physics188(1), 89 (1999). DOI 10.1023/A:1005149303094

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1005149303094 1999

  34. [34]

    Ichimoto, K

    K. Ichimoto, K. Kumagai, I. Sano, T. Kobiki, A. Munoz, T. Sakurai, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan48(3), 545 (1996). DOI 10.1093/pasj/48.3.545

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/48.3.545 1996

  35. [35]

    Reginald, O.C.S

    N.L. Reginald, O.C.S. Cyr, J.M. Davila, J.W. Brosius, Astrophys. J.599(1), 596 (2003). DOI 10.1086/379148

    work page doi:10.1086/379148 2003

  36. [36]

    Hanaoka, Y

    Y. Hanaoka, Y. Sakai, K. Takahashi, Solar Physics296(11), 158 (2021). DOI 10. 1007/s11207-021-01907-0. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-021-01907-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-021-01907-0 2021

  37. [37]

    Hanaoka, Y

    Y. Hanaoka, Y. Sakai, Y. Masuda, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences11 (2024). DOI 10.3389/fspas.2024.1458746

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2024.1458746 2024

  38. [38]

    Druckmüller, V

    M. Druckmüller, V. Rušin, P. Aniol, S.R. Habbal, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 965(1), L10 (2024). DOI 10.3847/2041-8213/ad353b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad353b 2024

  39. [39]

    Bemporad, Astrophys

    A. Bemporad, Astrophys. J.904(2), 178 (2020). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/abc482

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc482 2020

  40. [40]

    Bemporad, Astrophys

    A. Bemporad, Astrophys. J.946(1), 14 (2023). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/acb8b8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb8b8 2023

  41. [41]

    B. Boe, S. Habbal, M. Druckmüller, The Astrophysical Journal895(2), L35 (2020). DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ae6. URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab8ae6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8ae6 2020

  42. [42]

    Woo, S.R

    R. Woo, S.R. Habbal, AIP Conference Proceedings679(1), 55 (2003). DOI 10.1063/ 1.1618540. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1618540

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1618540 2003

  43. [43]

    M. Zeiler. World eclipses: 2021 to 2040 (2025). URLhttps://www.eclipse-maps. com/. (Map of world eclipses from 2021 to 2040) 16 Suprit Singh and Bharti Arora

    2021

  44. [44]

    J. M. Pasachoff, Nature Astronomy1(8), 0190 (2017). DOI 10.1038/ s41550-017-0190. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0190

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0190 2017

  45. [45]

    Liberatore, G

    A. Liberatore, G. Capobianco, S. Fineschi, G. Massone, L. Zangrilli, R. Susino, G. Nicolini, Solar Physics297(3), 29 (2022). DOI 10.1007/s11207-022-01958-x. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-022-01958-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-022-01958-x 2022

  46. [46]

    M. Shelley. Dslr/mirrorless camera artefact summary.https://markshelley.co. uk/Astronomy/camera_summary.html. Accessed: 2025-10-20

    2025

  47. [47]

    Field of view calculator.https://astronomy.tools/ calculators/field_of_view/

    Astronomy.tools. Field of view calculator.https://astronomy.tools/ calculators/field_of_view/. Accessed: 2025-10-20

    2025

  48. [48]

    Molnar, R

    M.E. Molnar, R. Casini, P. Bryans, B. Berkey, K. Tyson, Solar Physics300(7), 88 (2025). DOI 10.1007/s11207-025-02500-5. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/ s11207-025-02500-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-025-02500-5 2025

  49. [49]

    Hinode solar guider.https://www.sciencecenter

    Hutech Astronomical Products. Hinode solar guider.https://www.sciencecenter. net/hutech/Hinode-sg/index.htm. Accessed: 2025-10-20

    2025

  50. [50]

    Hart (2024)

    P. Hart (2024). Private communication

    2024

  51. [51]

    Mobberley,Total Solar Eclipses and How to Observe Them(2007)

    M. Mobberley,Total Solar Eclipses and How to Observe Them(2007). DOI 10. 1007/978-0-387-69828-1

    2007

  52. [52]

    Baily, Mon

    F. Baily, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.4, 15 (1836). DOI 10.1093/mnras/4.2.15

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/4.2.15

  53. [53]

    X.M. Jubier. Local circumstances calculator (v1.0.6).http://xjubier.free.fr/ en/site_pages/SolarEclipseCalc_Diagram.html(2007). Last page update on July 7, 2007. Accessed: 2025-10-20

    2007

  54. [54]

    X.M. Jubier. Shutter speed calculator for solar eclipses (v1.0.2).http://xjubier. free.fr/en/site_pages/SolarEclipseExposure.html(2017). Last page update on July 3, 2017. Accessed: 2025-10-20

    2017

  55. [55]

    Solareclipsemaestroformacosx.http://xjubier.free.fr/en/site_ pages/solar_eclipses/Solar_Eclipse_Maestro_Photography_Software.html (2021)

    X.M.Jubier. Solareclipsemaestroformacosx.http://xjubier.free.fr/en/site_ pages/solar_eclipses/Solar_Eclipse_Maestro_Photography_Software.html (2021). Last page update on November 9, 2021. Accessed: 2025-10-20

    2021

  56. [56]

    Edwards, K.A

    L. Edwards, K.A. Bunting, B. Ramsey, M. Gunn, T. Fearn, T. Knight, G.D. Muro, H. Morgan, Solar Physics298(12), 140 (2023). DOI 10.1007/s11207-023-02231-5. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-023-02231-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-023-02231-5 2023

  57. [57]

    Voulgaris, P.S

    A.G. Voulgaris, P.S. Gaintatzis, J.H. Seiradakis, J.M. Pasachoff, T.E. Economou, Solar Physics278(1), 187 (2012). DOI 10.1007/s11207-012-9929-4. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1007/s11207-012-9929-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-012-9929-4 2012

  58. [58]

    Voulgaris, C

    A.G. Voulgaris, C. Mouratidis, K. Tziotziou, J.H. Seiradakis, J.M. Pasachoff, Solar Physics297(4), 49 (2022). DOI 10.1007/s11207-022-01983-w. URLhttps://doi. org/10.1007/s11207-022-01983-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-022-01983-w 2022

  59. [59]

    Noble, D.M

    M.W. Noble, D.M. Rust, P.N. Bernasconi, J.M. Pasachoff, B.A. Babcock, M.A. Bruck, Applied Optics47(31), 5744 (2008). DOI 10.1364/AO.47.005744

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.47.005744 2008

  60. [60]

    G.D. Muro, M. Gunn, S. Fearn, T. Fearn, H. Morgan, Solar Physics298(6), 75 (2023). DOI 10.1007/s11207-023-02162-1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/ s11207-023-02162-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-023-02162-1 2023