Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Decoding the Early-Time Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. I. A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework for Demographic Inference

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A hierarchical Bayesian framework that fits power-law models simultaneously to many Type Ia supernova light curves reduces bias in the inferred population parameters for rise time, scatter, and correlations.

desk verdict The hierarchical Bayesian setup reduces bias on population parameters versus two-step fitting when simulations match the model, but validation leaves open questions on non-Gaussian demographics and realistic morphologies. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00075 v1 pith:NVKFPPCG submitted 2026-06-30 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

Chang Liu , Adam A. Miller This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords TypeIasupernovaelightcurvemodelinghierarchicalBayesianinferenceearly-timephotometrypopulationdemographicspower-lawrisedemographic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a hierarchical Bayesian approach to model the early-time power-law rises of Type Ia supernovae across a large sample. By placing a multivariate Gaussian prior on the population distribution of rise parameters, the method automatically down-weights poor-quality data and avoids the need for selection cuts. Tests on simulated data show that this simultaneous fitting recovers the true population mean, variance, and correlations with far less bias than fitting each supernova individually and then combining the results. Even when the power-law form does not perfectly match more complex light-curve shapes, the population scatter is recovered reliably, while individual rise times may be mildly underestimated. The inferred distribution also serves as a prior that improves fits to single events and naturally identifies outliers with early flux excesses.

What carries the argument

The hierarchical Bayesian model with a multivariate Gaussian population prior on the power-law parameters of rise time, rise index, and amplitude.

What would settle it

Apply both the hierarchical method and the classic two-step method to the same set of simulated light curves drawn from a known population distribution; if the hierarchical method recovers the input mean, scatter, and correlation values with significantly smaller error, that supports the claim of bias reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The hierarchical Bayesian model with a multivariate Gaussian population prior on the power-law rise parameters (rise time, rise index, and amplitude) yields substantially less biased estimates of the population-level mean, scatter, and correlations than the standard two-step procedure of individual fits followed by aggregation. The population prior suppresses volume-projection bias from asymmetric likelihoods and down-weights sparse or noisy measurements without explicit cuts. When the power-law model is applied to light curves with more realistic morphologies, the recovered population scatter remains reliable despite mild underestimation of rise times due to model misspecification. Supernov

Load-bearing premise

The distribution of power-law rise parameters across the supernova population is well described by a multivariate Gaussian, and the power-law model itself is adequate for recovering demographic properties despite some mismatch with realistic light-curve shapes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Population parameters of SN Ia early light curves can be constrained from heterogeneous datasets without introducing selection biases from quality cuts.
  • Individual supernova light-curve fits can be improved by using the population distribution as a prior that regularizes nuisance parameters.
  • Events with early-time flux excesses can be identified as statistical outliers in the rise-parameter space.
  • The method maintains reliable recovery of population scatter even when the power-law model is misspecified relative to actual light-curve shapes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If applied to real observational data, the framework could quantify whether the distribution of rise indices deviates from Gaussianity.
  • The outlier identification might correlate with other supernova properties to distinguish progenitor systems.
  • Extending the model to include additional parameters or different functional forms could test the robustness of the demographic inferences.
  • Using the population prior on real survey data might allow inclusion of more supernovae in cosmological analyses by reducing the impact of sparse sampling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a hierarchical Bayesian framework for inferring the demographic distribution of Type Ia supernova early light-curve parameters (rise time, rise index, amplitude) modeled as power laws. A multivariate Gaussian population prior is used to fit the full dataset simultaneously, automatically down-weighting sparse or noisy events and avoiding selection biases from quality cuts. Validation on simulated power-law data shows the hierarchical method reduces bias on population mean, scatter, and correlations relative to the two-step approach of individual fits followed by aggregation. The framework also identifies outliers (e.g., early flux excesses) and can regularize individual fits by restricting the prior to nuisance parameters while preserving correlations.

Significance. If the central bias-reduction result generalizes beyond the tested conditions, the framework offers a principled way to extract population-level constraints on SN Ia progenitor diversity without introducing selection effects. The reported reliability of recovered scatter under realistic morphology misspecification is a useful practical feature. The approach builds on standard hierarchical modeling techniques but applies them specifically to early-time SN Ia demographics, with potential to improve both population and individual-event inferences.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract/validation description] Abstract (validation paragraph): The claim that the hierarchical approach 'dramatically reduces the bias' on population parameters is demonstrated exclusively on simulations drawn from the same multivariate Gaussian population model used for inference. This leaves untested the performance when the true demographic distribution deviates from multivariate Gaussian (e.g., heavy tails, skewness, or multimodality in rise time/index/amplitude), which is load-bearing for the comparison to the two-step method on real data.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'the recovered population scatter remains reliable' under realistic morphologies should be supported by a quantitative metric (e.g., fractional bias or coverage) rather than a qualitative description.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: Clarify the precise mechanism by which 'restricting the population prior to nuisance amplitudes, while preserving the complete correlation structure' avoids shrinking the physically meaningful rise time and index parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract (validation paragraph): The claim that the hierarchical approach 'dramatically reduces the bias' on population parameters is demonstrated exclusively on simulations drawn from the same multivariate Gaussian population model used for inference. This leaves untested the performance when the true demographic distribution deviates from multivariate Gaussian (e.g., heavy tails, skewness, or multimodality in rise time/index/amplitude), which is load-bearing for the comparison to the two-step method on real data.

    Authors: We agree that the primary validation in the abstract and main text demonstrates recovery when data are drawn from the assumed multivariate Gaussian population model. This is the standard first step to isolate the effect of the hierarchical prior in suppressing the volume-projection bias from the asymmetric likelihood, independent of population shape. We also already test under light-curve morphology misspecification (realistic shapes rather than pure power laws), where population scatter remains reliable. However, the referee correctly identifies that robustness to non-Gaussian demographic distributions is not yet shown. In revision we will add simulations drawn from heavy-tailed, skewed, and multimodal population distributions to directly compare bias reduction between the hierarchical and two-step approaches under these conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a hierarchical Bayesian model with a multivariate Gaussian population prior on power-law rise parameters and validates bias reduction via simulations drawn from that same model. This is standard forward-model validation under stated assumptions rather than a derivation that reduces claimed results to inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described framework; the central comparison to the two-step method rests on explicit simulation tests that remain falsifiable outside the fitted values.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on the multivariate Gaussian assumption for the population and the power-law model for individual light curves. Since only the abstract is available, specific fitted values are not known.

free parameters (2)
  • population mean vector
    The mean of the multivariate Gaussian for rise parameters is fitted from data.
  • population covariance matrix
    The scatter and correlations in the population prior are inferred from the data.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The population distribution of light-curve parameters is multivariate Gaussian.
    Used as the prior for demographic inference.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decoding the Early-Time Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. I. A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework for Demographic Inference." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NVKFPPCG

@misc{pith2026260700075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decoding the Early-Time Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. I. A Hierarchical Bayesian Framework for Demographic Inference},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NVKFPPCG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00075}
}
read the original abstract

Light curves of Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) in the days following explosion encode the diversity of progenitor systems and explosion physics. We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework to robustly constrain the population-level light-curve morphology of SNe Ia by fitting a large light-curve dataset simultaneously to power-law rises. Using a multivariate Gaussian population prior, this framework automatically down-weights sparsely sampled SNe and noisy measurements in the inference, obviating the need for restrictive quality cuts that introduce selection biases. Validation on simulated power-law light curves demonstrates that the population prior effectively suppresses the volume-projection bias from the asymmetric likelihood: compared to the classic two-step approach of fitting individual SNe and then aggregating the results, the hierarchical approach dramatically reduces the bias on the population-level parameters (mean, scatter, and correlation). When fitting the power-law model to light curves with more realistic morphologies, while the rise time can be mildly underestimated due to model misspecification, the recovered population scatter remains reliable. Furthermore, SNe with early flux excesses can emerge as outliers in the inferred parameter space, offering a potential diagnostic for identifying such events. Finally, we show that the inferred population distribution can also improve individual-event inference. Restricting the population prior to nuisance amplitudes, while preserving the complete correlation structure, regularizes fits to individual SNe without shrinking the physically meaningful rise time and rise index toward their population means.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Probabilistic graphical model of our hierarchical Bayesian framework for modeling early-time SN Ia light curves. Nodes (ellipses) represent variables: solid ellipses are random variables sampled from the priors listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Demonstration of how the highly asymmetric likelihood surface of the power-law model impacts the trise and α posteriors for two synthetic SNe (α = 2.6, red; α = 1.4, blue), alongside the effect of Bayesian shrinkage. Left: Joint posteriors sampled with uninformative uniform priors. The MAP (circles) and marginalized median (squares) estimates are compared to the true parameters (stars). The high-α SN shows an extend… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Applying early-time coverage cuts to the full sample biases the distribution of rise times. Top: Kernel density estimates (KDEs) of trise in two mock SN Ia populations: one where light-curve parameters are drawn independently (left) and one where they follow empirical correlations (right). The complete simulated sample with minimal early coverage requirements (grey solid line) is compared against subsets surviving s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Inferred population-level mean and scatter for trise, αr, and ln Ar across three mock samples with varying early-time coverage requirements. The inferred parameter distributions are compared against the true input values (dashed lines). The results remain consistent ac…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Aggregating the outcomes of individual fits (the unpooled method; colored profiles), either by naively stacking the individual posterior samples (top panels) or by reweighting each SN by the inverse variance of its parameters (bottom panels), generally yields biased in…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Hierarchical Bayesian model recovers the population-level scatter in synthetic data. In contrast, naively stacking the population properties from individual fits (the unpooled method) generally overestimates the intrinsic scatter. The formatting matches [PITH_FULL_IMA…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hierarchical Bayesian modeling recovers the true parameter correlations in synthetic data. The formatting matches [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows the posterior distributions of the population-level mean and scatter of trise as a function of the truncation threshold for both mock datasets. As expected, the model misspecification leads to a biased µtrise estimate: when the underlying model is the curved powe…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Fitting a single power-law to SNe Ia with an early flux excess biases the inferred trise and α. Both panels display the inferred parameters for mock light curves gen￾erated with an underlying power-law and a Gaussian early flux excess. The mock SNe are color-coded by …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of different modeling approaches in recovering the true rise time of individual SNe Ia for the mock sample with uncorrelated parameters and Nearly ≥ 2. Upper: Inferred trise (posterior median) versus true values. Error bars are not displayed for clarity. Lo…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST Spectroscopy of Type Ia Supernova 2025rbs from Maximum Light to the Nebular Phase

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    First JWST mid-infrared spectra of a normal Type Ia supernova from maximum light reveal strongly stratified ejecta with stable nickel innermost, cobalt at intermediate radii, and argon outside, plus resolved ~800 km/s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2000, AJ, 119, 2110, doi: 10.1086/301344

    Aldering, G., Knop, R., & Nugent, P. 2000, AJ, 119, 2110, doi: 10.1086/301344

    work page doi:10.1086/301344 2000

  2. [2]

    J., et al

    Ashall, C., Lu, J., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7235

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac7235 2022

  3. [3]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2018, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2018

  4. [4]

    P., Jankowiak, M., et al

    Bingham, E., Chen, J. P., Jankowiak, M., et al. 2019, JMLR, 20, 1

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    2018, JAX: Composable Transformations of Python+NumPy

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018, JAX: Composable Transformations of Python+NumPy

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    A., Yao, Y., et al

    Bulla, M., Miller, A. A., Yao, Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb13c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb13c 2020

  7. [7]

    A., Sarbadhicary, S

    Burke, J., Howell, D. A., Sarbadhicary, S. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 919, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac126b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac126b 2021

  8. [8]

    R., Howell , D

    Cao, Y., Kulkarni, S. R., Howell, D. A., et al. 2015, Nature, 521, 328, doi: 10.1038/nature14440

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14440 2015

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    A., Howes, A., et al

    Conley, A., Howell, D. A., Howes, A., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1707, doi: 10.1086/507788

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    R., et al

    Deckers, M., Maguire, K., Magee, M. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1317, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac558 DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Acevedo, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    J., Rest, A., et al

    Dimitriadis, G., Foley, R. J., Rest, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 870, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaedb0

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    R., et al

    Dimitriadis, G., Maguire, K., Karambelkar, V. R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad536

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Vallely, P

    Fausnaugh, M. M., Vallely, P. J., Tucker, M. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceaef

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    E., Sullivan, M., Gal-Yam, A., et al

    Firth, R. E., Sullivan, M., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2314

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    W., & Morton, T

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., & Morton, T. D. 2014, ApJ, 795, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/64

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., & Filippenko, A. V. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2607, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19213.x

    2011 doi

  9. [17]

    E., Kim, A., et al

    Goldhaber, G., Groom, D. E., Kim, A., et al. 2001, ApJ, 558, 359, doi: 10.1086/322460 Gonz´ alez-Gait´ an, S., Conley, A., Bianco, F. B., et al. 2011, ApJ, 745, 44, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/44

    2001 doi

  10. [18]

    2007, A&A, 466, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    2007 doi

  11. [19]

    T., Garnavich, P

    Hayden, B. T., Garnavich, P. M., Kessler, R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 712, 350, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/350

    2010 doi

  12. [20]

    R., Davis, T

    Hinton, S. R., Davis, T. M., Kim, A. G., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab13a3

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    D., & Gelman, A

    Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. 2014, doi: 10.5555/2627435.2638586

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    W., Myers, A

    Hogg, D. W., Myers, A. D., & Bovy, J. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2166

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    J., Valenti, S., et al

    Hosseinzadeh, G., Sand, D. J., Valenti, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8402

    2017 doi

  16. [24]

    2025, ApJ, 984, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a4

    Iskandar, A., Wang, X., Esamdin, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a4

    2025 doi

  17. [25]

    2018, ApJ, 865, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb9a

    Jiang, J.-a., Doi, M., Maeda, K., & Shigeyama, T. 2018, ApJ, 865, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb9a

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    2021, ApJ, 923, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac375f

    Jiang, J.-a., Maeda, K., Kawabata, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac375f

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 1025, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    Kasen, D. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1025, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    2016, MNRAS, 459, 4428, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw962

    Kromer, M., Fremling, C., Pakmor, R., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 4428, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw962

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    J., & Bildsten, L

    Kumar, G., Prust, L. J., & Bildsten, L. 2025, ApJ, 992, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfdd7

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    2009, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1989, doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008

    Lewandowski, D., Kurowicka, D., & Joe, H. 2009, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1989, doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2009.04.008

    2009 doi

  23. [31]

    2018, ApJ, 870, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec74

    Li, W., Wang, X., Vink´ o, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 870, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec74

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    A., Sarin, N., et al

    Liu, C., Miller, A. A., Sarin, N., et al. 2026, Submitted to ApJ

    2026

  25. [33]

    R., Maguire, K., Kotak, R., et al

    Magee, M. R., Maguire, K., Kotak, R., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936684

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    R., Cuddy, C., Maguire, K., et al

    Magee, M. R., Cuddy, C., Maguire, K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3035, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1045

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 3258, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1607

    Maguire, K., Sullivan, M., Pan, Y.-C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3258, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1607

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    M., & Gair, J

    Mandel, I., Farr, W. M., & Gair, J. R. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 1086, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz896

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R

    Mandel, K. S., Narayan, G., & Kirshner, R. P. 2011, ApJ, 731, 120, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/2/120

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    H., Brown, P

    Marion, G. H., Brown, P. J., Vink´ o, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 92, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/92

    2016 doi

  31. [39]

    A., Abril-Pla, O., Deklerk, J., et al

    Martin, O. A., Abril-Pla, O., Deklerk, J., et al. 2026, J. Open Source Softw., 11, 9889, doi: 10.21105/joss.09889

    2026 doi

  32. [40]

    A., Cao, Y., Piro, A

    Miller, A. A., Cao, Y., Piro, A. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 852, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa01f 19

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    A., Yao, Y., Bulla, M., et al

    Miller, A. A., Yao, Y., Bulla, M., et al. 2020a, ApJ, 902, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb13b

    doi

  34. [42]

    A., Magee, M

    Miller, A. A., Magee, M. R., Polin, A., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 898, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9e05

    doi

  35. [43]

    Q., Moon, D.-S., Drout, M

    Ni, Y. Q., Moon, D.-S., Drout, M. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbbb7

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    M., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., et al

    Noebauer, U. M., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2093

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Taubenberger, S., Blinnikov, S., Sorokina, E., & Hillebrandt, W

    Noebauer, U. M., Taubenberger, S., Blinnikov, S., Sorokina, E., & Hillebrandt, W. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2972, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2197

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 5045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3301

    Papadogiannakis, S., Goobar, A., Amanullah, R., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 5045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3301

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  40. [48]

    2019, Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554

    Phan, D., Pradhan, N., & Jankowiak, M. 2019, Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554

    2019 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Piro, A. L. 2015, ApJ, 808, L51, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L51

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    L., & Morozova, V

    Piro, A. L., & Morozova, V. S. 2016, ApJ, 826, 96, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/96

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    L., & Nakar, E

    Piro, A. L., & Nakar, E. 2013, ApJ, 769, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/67

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    L., & Nakar, E

    Piro, A. L., & Nakar, E. 2014, ApJ, 784, 85, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/85

    2014 doi

  45. [53]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009, doi: 10.1086/300499

    1998 doi

  46. [54]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Li, W., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 2675, doi: 10.1086/301143

    1999 doi

  47. [55]

    2025, A&A, 694, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450388

    Rigault, M., Smith, M., Goobar, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450388

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 3541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1525

    Sai, H., Wang, X., Elias-Rosa, N., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1525

    2022 doi

  49. [57]

    Sarin, N., H¨ ubner, M., Omand, C. M. B., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 1203, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1238

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    R., Kwok, L

    Siebert, M. R., Kwok, L. A., Johansson, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 960, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0975

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    J., Huber, M

    Srivastav, S., Smartt, S. J., Huber, M. E., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 943, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb2ce

    doi

  53. [61]

    2023b, ApJ, 956, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acffaf

    Srivastav, S., Moore, T., Nicholl, M., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 956, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acffaf

    doi

  54. [62]

    D., Shappee, B

    Stritzinger, M. D., Shappee, B. J., Piro, A. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aadd46 The Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, Astron. Astrophys., 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 The Astropy Collaboration, Pric...

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    2019, Publ

    Thrane, E., & Talbot, C. 2019, Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust., 36, e010, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2019.2

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A

    Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A. N., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064505, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    J., Kochanek, C

    Vallely, P. J., Kochanek, C. S., Stanek, K. Z., Fausnaugh, M., & Shappee, B. J. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 5639, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3675

    2021 doi

  58. [66]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0edb

    Wang, Q., Rest, A., Dimitriadis, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0edb

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    2025, ApJ, 991, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf05a

    Wu, W., Jiang, J.-a., Meng, D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf05a

    2025 doi

  60. [68]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 9957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3691

    Xi, G., Wang, X., Li, G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9957, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3691

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Zheng, W., & Filippenko, A. V. 2017, ApJ, 838, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa6442

    2017 doi

  62. [70]

    L., & Filippenko, A

    Zheng, W., Kelly, P. L., & Filippenko, A. V. 2017, ApJ, 848, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b19

    2017 doi

  63. [71]

    L., & Filippenko, A

    Zheng, W., Kelly, P. L., & Filippenko, A. V. 2018, ApJ, 858, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabaeb

    2018 doi

  64. [72]

    M., Filippenko, A

    Zheng, W., Silverman, J. M., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, L15, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/778/1/L15

    2013 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.