Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Decoding the Early-Time Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Population Parameters of One Thousand ZTF Supernovae

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Type Ia supernovae exhibit a bifurcated rise morphology versus stretch relation, with high-stretch events showing shallower rises and persistent early blue colors.

desk verdict Large ZTF sample pins down SN Ia rise population numbers and flags a stretch bifurcation, though the 30% flux cutoff needs checks for bias. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00081 v1 pith:PNUQ4KJ5 submitted 2026-06-30 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.IM

Chang Liu , Adam A. Miller , Nikhil Sarin , Kate Maguire , Tomás E. Müller-Bravo , Ping Chen , L. Galbany , Young-Lo Kim
show 8 more authors
Jesper Sollerman Eric C. Bellm Joahan Castaneda Jaimes Tracy X. Chen Matthew J. Graham David Hale Mansi M. Kasliwal Josiah Purdum
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM
keywords TypeIasupernovaeearlylightcurvesrisetimepower-lawfitsZTFsurveypopulationparametersnickelmixingSALT2stretch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper measures the early rise of 972 Type Ia supernovae from a volume-complete ZTF sample using power-law fits restricted to data before 30 percent of peak flux. It reports population averages for rise time of 18.55 days, rise index of 2.10 in r-band, and g-r color difference of 0.20, all with quantified scatter. The central finding is that the link between rise shape and overall light-curve width splits into two regimes: high-stretch supernovae display clear correlations with shallower rises and longer-lasting blue colors, while low-stretch events show no such trends. A reader would care because these measurements directly constrain the distribution of nickel in the outer ejecta and therefore the explosion mechanism.

What carries the argument

Hierarchical Bayesian power-law fits applied to light curves truncated at 30 percent of peak flux across a volume-complete sample of 972 events.

What would settle it

Re-fitting the same 972 events with data included up to 40 percent of peak flux and obtaining substantially different population means or scatters for rise time or index would show the truncation choice biases the results.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Power-law modeling of early light curves for 972 ZTF SNe Ia yields population parameters t_rise of 18.55 plus or minus 0.08 days with sigma 1.42 days, alpha of 2.10 plus or minus 0.04 with sigma 0.48 in ZTF r, and alpha_g minus alpha_r of 0.20 plus or minus 0.02 with sigma 0.17. The relation between rise morphology and SALT2 x1 stretch bifurcates into two regimes where high-stretch events correlate higher x1 with shallower rises and more persistent blue colors while low-stretch events lack these trends; long-duration flux excesses around 5 days are common in the high-stretch population and tied to those features, indicating widespread outward 56Ni mixing.

Load-bearing premise

The power-law model remains an adequate description of the light curves when the fit is restricted to data up to 30 percent of peak flux.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-stretch SNe Ia commonly display long-duration flux excesses linked to shallow rises and early blue colors.
  • The dichotomy between high- and low-stretch populations in rise morphology must be reproduced by multi-dimensional explosion models that include realistic progenitor setups.
  • Several normal SNe Ia display unusually long rise times that may include short-duration flux excesses over a smooth rise.
  • Rise times correlate positively with x1 overall, but this relation flattens within the high-stretch population.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The two-regime behavior could serve as an observable to separate different progenitor channels for Type Ia supernovae.
  • Early-time photometry from future wide-field surveys could be used to assign individual events to one regime or the other before peak.
  • If the regimes also differ in peak luminosity or color at maximum, the bifurcation would affect how these events are standardized for cosmology.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive robust population parameters for the early rise of 972 Type Ia supernovae using power-law fits to ZTF light curves truncated at 30% of peak flux within a hierarchical Bayesian model. Key results include t_rise with mean 18.55 days and dispersion 1.42 days, rise index α mean 2.10 and dispersion 0.48 in r-band, color evolution difference mean 0.20, and a bifurcation in the rise morphology versus SALT2 x1 relation, with implications for 56Ni mixing in high-stretch events.

Significance. The study benefits from an order-of-magnitude larger sample than previous work and employs a hierarchical framework that properly accounts for uncertainties, providing empirical benchmarks for SN Ia models. The identification of distinct regimes in rise behavior and potential flux excesses offers testable predictions for explosion physics. However, the significance is tempered by the need to confirm that the truncation choice does not introduce systematic biases in the reported means and dispersions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The claim of robust constraints on t_rise, α, and the x1 bifurcation depends on the power-law model being adequate at the 30% peak flux truncation. The abstract acknowledges sensitivity when including data beyond ~40% but does not quantify whether the population hyperparameters (μ, σ) shift significantly when the cutoff is varied between 20-35%, which is necessary to support the 'robust' qualifier.
  2. [Results on bifurcation] The reported bifurcation where high-stretch SNe show trends with x1 but low-stretch do not is central to the interpretation of widespread outward 56Ni mixing. Without an explicit test of how this split behaves under different truncation epochs or alternative early-time models, it is unclear if the dichotomy is physical or influenced by the modeling cutoff.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] The rise index is denoted α in r-band and the color difference as α_g - α_r; a clear definition early in the text would aid readability.
  2. [Sample description] Clarify how the 972 events were selected from the one thousand ZTF supernovae mentioned in the title to ensure reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which identify key areas where additional quantification would strengthen the manuscript's claims of robustness. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to incorporate the suggested tests.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The claim of robust constraints on t_rise, α, and the x1 bifurcation depends on the power-law model being adequate at the 30% peak flux truncation. The abstract acknowledges sensitivity when including data beyond ~40% but does not quantify whether the population hyperparameters (μ, σ) shift significantly when the cutoff is varied between 20-35%, which is necessary to support the 'robust' qualifier.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's use of 'robust' would be better supported by an explicit demonstration that the population hyperparameters remain stable when the truncation epoch is varied between 20% and 35% of peak flux. The manuscript notes general convergence for earlier epochs but does not report the specific shifts in μ and σ across this range. In the revised version we will add a supplementary analysis (or figure) repeating the hierarchical fits at 20%, 25%, 30%, and 35% truncations and tabulating the resulting changes in the reported means and dispersions for t_rise, α, and color evolution. This will either confirm stability or allow us to qualify the robustness statement appropriately. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on bifurcation] The reported bifurcation where high-stretch SNe show trends with x1 but low-stretch do not is central to the interpretation of widespread outward 56Ni mixing. Without an explicit test of how this split behaves under different truncation epochs or alternative early-time models, it is unclear if the dichotomy is physical or influenced by the modeling cutoff.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the bifurcation result is central to the physical interpretation and that its stability under changes in truncation has not been explicitly demonstrated. While the manuscript already flags sensitivity beyond ~40%, we have not tested the high- versus low-stretch split at other cutoffs within 20-35%. In revision we will repeat the bifurcation analysis at 25% and 35% truncations and report whether the two-regime behavior persists. We note that a full exploration of alternative early-time models (e.g., broken power laws or physically motivated templates) lies beyond the scope of the present power-law study but will be flagged as important future work; the truncation tests alone will clarify whether the reported dichotomy is robust to the specific modeling cutoff chosen. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical population parameters are direct outputs of hierarchical Bayesian fit to observed data.

full rationale

The paper performs a hierarchical Bayesian fit of a power-law model to early-time ZTF light-curve data truncated at 30% of peak flux, directly yielding posterior means and dispersions for t_rise, alpha, and color evolution as reported quantities. No step claims a 'prediction' that reduces to a fitted input by the paper's own equations, no uniqueness theorem is imported via self-citation, and no ansatz is smuggled in; the truncation sensitivity is noted but does not create a definitional loop. The derivation chain is self-contained against external data.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes empirical population statistics derived from data fitting. No new physical entities are introduced. The main modeling choices and statistical hyperparameters constitute the ledger entries.

free parameters (2)
  • population hyperparameters (mu and sigma for t_rise, alpha, color difference)
    These are the fitted values reported as the main results of the hierarchical model.
  • truncation epoch (30% of peak flux)
    Chosen cutoff for including data in the power-law fits; abstract notes results are sensitive to this choice.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Early-time supernova flux follows a power-law form
    Core assumption underlying all light-curve fits described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The 972-event sample is volume-complete and representative of normal Type Ia supernovae
    Stated basis for deriving population-level constraints.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decoding the Early-Time Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Population Parameters of One Thousand ZTF Supernovae." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PNUQ4KJ5

@misc{pith2026260700081,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decoding the Early-Time Light Curves of Type Ia Supernovae. II. Population Parameters of One Thousand ZTF Supernovae},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PNUQ4KJ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00081}
}
abstract

Early-time light curves of Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) encode critical information about their progenitor systems. We characterize the rise of normal SNe Ia using a volume-complete sample of 972 events from the Zwicky Transient Facility Data Release 2, an order of magnitude larger than any previous dataset for similar analyses. Fitting light curves up to $30\%$ of peak flux with a power-law model under a hierarchical Bayesian framework, we provide robust population-level constraints on the rise time ($t_\mathrm{rise}$; $\mu=18.55\pm0.08$ days, $\sigma=1.42\pm0.07$ days), rise index ($\alpha$; $\mu=2.10\pm0.04$, $\sigma=0.48\pm0.03$ in ZTF $r$), and $g-r$ color evolution ($\alpha_g - \alpha_r$; $\mu=0.20\pm0.02$, $\sigma=0.17\pm0.02$). These power-law fits are sensitive to the chosen truncation epoch if data beyond $\sim$$40\%$ of peak flux are included, but generally converge when restricted to earlier epochs. The relation between rise morphology and light-curve width ($\texttt{SALT2}$ $x_1$ stretch) bifurcates into two distinct regimes: high-stretch SNe Ia show clear trends where a higher $x_1$ correlates with shallower rises and more persistent blue colors, whereas low-stretch SNe Ia lack such trends. While rise times correlate positively with $x_1$ overall, this relation flattens significantly within the high-stretch population. Searching for anomalies, we identify several normal SNe Ia with unusually long rise times, which potentially exhibit short-duration ($\lesssim$2 days) flux excesses over a smooth rise. Long-duration ($\sim$5 days) flux excesses appear common within the high-stretch population and are tied to the shallow rises and early blue colors, pointing to widespread outward $^{56}$Ni mixing. Multi-dimensional explosion models with more realistic progenitor setups are needed to fully reproduce the observed dichotomy in rise morphology and stretch.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00081 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Population-level mean and scatter of early-time parameters in the ZTF DR2 volume-complete sample inferred with the hierarchical Bayesian framework. The posterior distributions of the mean and scatter for the rise time (trise), the r-band rise index (αr), and the early-time color evolution index (αg − αr) are shown for three different truncation thresholds: 50%, 40%, and 30%. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 ρ(trise, αr) Density −0.4… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Population-level parameter correlations in the ZTF DR2 volume-complete sample. The posterior distributions of the correlation coefficients between early-time parameters are shown across different flux truncation thresholds. We recover a near-perfect correlation between the g- and r-band rise indices and a moderate positive correlation between trise and αr. No significant correlation is found between trise and the co… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Additional early-time data-quality cuts may bias the sample towards higher-stretch SNe Ia. Top: the kernel density estimation of the x1 distribution for the volume-com￾plete sample (black), the Baseline sample (blue), and the Early sample (orange). Bottom: the cumulative distribution function of x1 for the three samples. The K-S test p-values comparing the Baseline and Early samples against the vol￾ume-complete samp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The inferred rise index (αr) exhibits a broken correlation with SALT2 x1, marked by a break at xbrk ≳ 0. The panels show results from fitting early-time light curves truncated at 50%, 40%, and 30% of peak flux. Dashed lines represent the median broken linear regression…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The early-time color evolution index (αg − αr) demonstrates a broken correlation with SALT2 x1, mirroring the behavior of the rise index seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The rise time, trise, exhibits a broken positive correlation with the full light-curve stretch (SALT2 x1) across ZTF SNe Ia. A break occurs near xbrk ≳ 0: for SNe Ia with x1 > xbrk, the rise time increases more slowly with x1 than for those with x1 < xbrk. Posterior pr…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The adjusted rise time reveals a continu￾ous, strongly correlated relationship with the full light-curve stretch x1, eliminating the break seen in the standard trise measurement. Top: The adjusted rise time, measured from the 2.5% and 10% peak flux epochs in the r-band…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Early-time properties of spectroscopically pe￾culiar SNe Ia in the ZTF DR2 sample compared to the normal population (gray). Subluminous and fast-evolving 91bg-like (red) and 02cx-like (cyan) events generally exhibit shorter adjusted rise times than normal SNe Ia, where…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Light curve fitting results for SNe Ia consistent with an anomalously large trise −t2.5%,r compared to other SNe with similar x1 in ZTF DR2 and their location in the phase diagrams. Left: The blue and orange points represent the observed fluxes in ZTF g and r bands, re…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Light curve fitting results for the four SNe Ia consistent with a linear rise (α ≃ 1) in the volume-limited sample of ZTF DR2. Plot formatting follows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The early-time parameter (trise, αr, αg − αr) correlations with SALT2 x1 are distinct for the sub-MCh (blue), near-MCh (green), and super-MCh (orange) populations defined in N. Sarin et al. (2026). The posterior medians and 16–84th percentile ranges of the correlation…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The relation between the rise index αr and the adjusted rise time trise−t2.5%,r for the TURTLS models with double power-law (top) and exponential (bottom) density profiles. Each point represents a single synthetic light curve, color-coded by the progenitor parameters:…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The relation between the early-time color evolution index αg − αr and the adjusted rise time trise − t2.5%,r for the same TURTLS models as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The relationship between the adjusted rise time trise − t2.5%,r with the rise index αr (left) and color evolution index αg −αr (right) for the sub-MCh double-detonation models from K. J. Shen et al. (2021). Each point represents the median value and 16th–84th percenti…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Correlations between early-time parameters and the full light-curve stretch x1 for the same subset of 272 SNe Ia, where the individual parameter estimates are inferred using a custom population prior that retains the correlation structure for the nuisance parameter ln…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST Spectroscopy of Type Ia Supernova 2025rbs from Maximum Light to the Nebular Phase

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    First JWST mid-infrared spectra of a normal Type Ia supernova from maximum light reveal strongly stratified ejecta with stable nickel innermost, cobalt at intermediate radii, and argon outside, plus resolved ~800 km/s...

  2. AT2025agpz in Rubin commissioning data: distinguishing a luminous interacting supernova from nuclear transients in compact galaxies

    astro-ph.HE 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AT2025agpz, a long-rising luminous transient at z=0.147 in a dwarf galaxy nucleus, is best explained as an interacting superluminous supernova rather than a nuclear transient.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 109 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2026, A&A, 707, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555976

    Alburai, A., Galbany, L., Burgaz, U., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555976

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555976 2026

  2. [2]

    2025, A&A, 694, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452134

    Amenouche, M., Rosnet, P., Smith, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452134

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452134 2025

  3. [3]

    Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785, doi: 10.1086/159681

    work page doi:10.1086/159681 1982

  4. [4]

    J., et al

    Ashall, C., Lu, J., Shappee, B. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 932, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7235

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac7235 2022

  5. [5]

    W., et al

    Barna, B., Szalai, T., Jha, S. W., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 1078, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3543

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3543 2021

  6. [6]

    The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2018, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2018

  7. [7]

    P., Jankowiak, M., et al

    Bingham, E., Chen, J. P., Jankowiak, M., et al. 2019, JMLR, 20, 1

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    J., Dessart L., Townsley D

    Boos, S. J., Dessart, L., Townsley, D. M., & Shen, K. J. 2025, ApJ, 987, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/add400

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add400 2025

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Miles, B. J. 2021, ApJ, 919, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac07a2

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    2018, JAX: Composable Transformations of Python+NumPy

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018, JAX: Composable Transformations of Python+NumPy

    2018

  3. [11]

    A., Yao, Y., et al

    Bulla, M., Miller, A. A., Yao, Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb13c

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    A., et al

    Burke, J., Andrews, M., Howell, D. A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae058b

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Howes, A., et al

    Conley, A., Howell, D. A., Howes, A., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1707, doi: 10.1086/507788

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    R., et al

    Deckers, M., Maguire, K., Magee, M. R., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1317, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac558

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    M., Riddle, R., et al

    Dekany, R., Smith, R. M., Riddle, R., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 038001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab4ca2 DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Acevedo, M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6f9f

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Rest, A., et al

    Dimitriadis, G., Foley, R. J., Rest, A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 870, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaedb0

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    R., et al

    Dimitriadis, G., Maguire, K., Karambelkar, V. R., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad536

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    2025, A&A, 694, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451852

    Dimitriadis, G., Burgaz, U., Deckers, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451852

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    M., Vallely, P

    Fausnaugh, M. M., Vallely, P. J., Tucker, M. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aceaef

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    V., Richmond, M

    Filippenko, A. V., Richmond, M. W., Matheson, T., et al. 1992a, ApJ, 384, L15, doi: 10.1086/186252

    doi

  13. [21]

    V., Richmond, M

    Filippenko, A. V., Richmond, M. W., Branch, D., et al. 1992b, AJ, 104, 1543, doi: 10.1086/116339

    doi

  14. [22]

    K., Hillebrandt, W., et al

    Fink, M., R¨ opke, F. K., Hillebrandt, W., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913892

    2010 doi

  15. [23]

    R., et al

    Fink, M., Kromer, M., Seitenzahl, I. R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1762, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2315

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    E., Sullivan, M., Gal-Yam, A., et al

    Firth, R. E., Sullivan, M., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3895, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2314

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    Ganeshalingam, M., Li, W., & Filippenko, A. V. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2607, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19213.x

    2011 doi

  18. [26]

    2025, A&A, 695, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450378

    Ginolin, M., Rigault, M., Smith, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450378

    2025 doi

  19. [27]

    E., Kim, A., et al

    Goldhaber, G., Groom, D. E., Kim, A., et al. 2001, ApJ, 558, 359, doi: 10.1086/322460 26 Gonz´ alez-Gait´ an, S., Conley, A., Bianco, F. B., et al. 2011, ApJ, 745, 44, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/44

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    2014, ApJ, 784, L12, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/1/L12

    Goobar, A., Johansson, J., Amanullah, R., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, L12, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/1/L12

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 078001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    T., et al

    Gronow, S., Collins, C., Ohlmann, S. T., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A169, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936494

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    E., Sim, S

    Gronow, S., Collins, C. E., Sim, S. A., & R¨ opke, F. K. 2021, A&A, 649, A155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039954

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    2007, A&A, 466, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    Guy, J., Astier, P., Baumont, S., et al. 2007, A&A, 466, 11, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930

    2007 doi

  25. [33]

    T., Garnavich, P

    Hayden, B. T., Garnavich, P. M., Kasen, D., et al. 2010a, ApJ, 722, 1691, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1691

    doi

  26. [34]

    T., Garnavich, P

    Hayden, B. T., Garnavich, P. M., Kessler, R., et al. 2010b, ApJ, 712, 350, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/350

    doi

  27. [35]

    M., Prieto, J

    Hicken, M., Garnavich, P. M., Prieto, J. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, L17, doi: 10.1086/523301

    2007 doi

  28. [36]

    D., & Gelman, A

    Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. 2014, doi: 10.5555/2627435.2638586

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    B., Ashall, C., Jones, D

    Hoogendam, W. B., Ashall, C., Jones, D. O., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 209, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade787

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Valenti, S., et al

    Hosseinzadeh, G., Sand, D. J., Valenti, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8402

    2017 doi

  31. [39]

    A., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P

    Howell, D. A., Sullivan, M., Nugent, P. E., et al. 2006, Nature, 443, 308, doi: 10.1038/nature05103

    2006 doi

  32. [40]

    2025, ApJ, 984, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a4 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S

    Iskandar, A., Wang, X., Esamdin, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a4 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    2018, ApJ, 865, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb9a

    Jiang, J.-a., Doi, M., Maeda, K., & Shigeyama, T. 2018, ApJ, 865, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb9a

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    2020, ApJ, 892, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab76cb

    Jiang, J.-a., Yasuda, N., Maeda, K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 892, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab76cb

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    2021, ApJ, 923, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac375f

    Jiang, J.-a., Maeda, K., Kawabata, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac375f

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 1025, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    Kasen, D. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1025, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/1025

    2010 doi

  37. [45]

    C., & Nugent, P

    Kasen, D., Thomas, R. C., & Nugent, P. 2006, ApJ, 651, 366, doi: 10.1086/506190

    2006 doi

  38. [46]

    K., & Kasen, D

    Khatami, D. K., & Kasen, D. N. 2019, ApJ, 878, 56, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f09

    2019 doi

  39. [47]

    A., Fink, M., et al

    Kromer, M., Sim, S. A., Fink, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1067, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1067

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    2013, MNRAS, 429, 2287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts498

    Kromer, M., Fink, M., Stanishev, V., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2287, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts498

    2013 doi

  41. [49]

    A., Siebert, M

    Kwok, L. A., Siebert, M. R., Johansson, J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2c0d

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    W., Kwok, L

    Larison, C., Jha, S. W., Kwok, L. A., & Camacho-Neves, Y. 2024, ApJ, 961, 185, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0e0f

    2024 doi

  43. [51]

    V., Chornock, R., et al

    Li, W., Filippenko, A. V., Chornock, R., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 453, doi: 10.1086/374200

    2003 doi

  44. [52]

    2018, ApJ, 870, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec74

    Li, W., Wang, X., Vink´ o, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 870, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec74

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    Liu, C., & Miller, A. A. 2026, Submitted to ApJ

    2026

  46. [54]

    A., Boos, S

    Liu, C., Miller, A. A., Boos, S. J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acffc9

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    K., & Han, Z

    Liu, Z.-W., R¨ opke, F. K., & Han, Z. 2023, RAA, 23, 082001, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/acd89e

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    R., Maguire, K., Kotak, R., et al

    Magee, M. R., Maguire, K., Kotak, R., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936684

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    R., Sim, S

    Magee, M. R., Sim, S. A., Kotak, R., & Kerzendorf, W. E. 2018, A&A, 614, A115, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832675

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    R., Kotak, R., Sim, S

    Magee, M. R., Kotak, R., Sim, S. A., et al. 2016, A&A, 589, A89, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201528036

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    R., Cuddy, C., Maguire, K., et al

    Magee, M. R., Cuddy, C., Maguire, K., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3035, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1045

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    R., Killestein, T

    Magee, M. R., Killestein, T. L., Pursiainen, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 543, 3731, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1675

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    R., Leloudas, G., et al

    Maguire, K., Magee, M. R., Leloudas, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 1210, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2316

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    H., Brown, P

    Marion, G. H., Brown, P. J., Vink´ o, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 92, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/92

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    A., Abril-Pla, O., Deklerk, J., et al

    Martin, O. A., Abril-Pla, O., Deklerk, J., et al. 2026, J. Open Source Softw., 11, 9889, doi: 10.21105/joss.09889

    2026 doi

  56. [64]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2018, PASP, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    A., Cao, Y., Piro, A

    Miller, A. A., Cao, Y., Piro, A. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 852, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa01f

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    A., Yao, Y., Bulla, M., et al

    Miller, A. A., Yao, Y., Bulla, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb13b

    2020 doi

  59. [67]

    A., Abrams, N

    Miller, A. A., Abrams, N. S., Aldering, G., et al. 2025, PASP, 137, 094204, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ae02c5 M¨ uller-Bravo, T. E., Maguire, K., Alburai, A., et al. 2026, Submitted to A&A

    2025 doi

  60. [68]

    Q., Moon, D.-S., Drout, M

    Ni, Y. Q., Moon, D.-S., Drout, M. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbbb7

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    2021, A&A, 649, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038447

    Nicolas, N., Rigault, M., Copin, Y., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038447

    2021 doi

  62. [70]

    M., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., et al

    Noebauer, U. M., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 2787, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2093

    2017 doi

  63. [71]

    M., Taubenberger, S., Blinnikov, S., Sorokina, E., & Hillebrandt, W

    Noebauer, U. M., Taubenberger, S., Blinnikov, S., Sorokina, E., & Hillebrandt, W. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2972, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2197 O’Brien, J. T., Kerzendorf, W. E., Fullard, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2358

    2016 doi

  64. [72]

    P., Mushotzky, R., Shaya, E

    Olling, R. P., Mushotzky, R., Shaya, E. J., et al. 2015, Nature, 521, 332, doi: 10.1038/nature14455 27

    2015 doi

  65. [73]

    2012, ApJ, 747, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/L10

    Pakmor, R., Kromer, M., Taubenberger, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/L10

    2012 doi

  66. [74]

    C., Aldering, G., et al

    Pereira, R., Thomas, R. C., Aldering, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201221008

    2013 doi

  67. [75]

    1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  68. [76]

    2019, Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554

    Phan, D., Pradhan, N., & Jankowiak, M. 2019, Composable Effects for Flexible and Accelerated Probabilistic Programming in NumPyro, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.11554

    2019 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    Piro, A. L. 2015, ApJ, 808, L51, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L51

    2015 doi

  70. [78]

    L., & Morozova, V

    Piro, A. L., & Morozova, V. S. 2016, ApJ, 826, 96, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/96

    2016 doi

  71. [79]

    L., & Nakar, E

    Piro, A. L., & Nakar, E. 2013, ApJ, 769, 67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/67

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    L., & Nakar, E

    Piro, A. L., & Nakar, E. 2014, ApJ, 784, 85, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/85

    2014 doi

  73. [81]

    2013, ApJ, 772, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/1

    Raskin, C., & Kasen, D. 2013, ApJ, 772, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/1

    2013 doi

  74. [82]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/75

    Raskin, C., Kasen, D., Moll, R., Schwab, J., & Woosley, S. 2014, ApJ, 788, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/75

    2014 doi

  75. [83]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., et al. 1998, AJ, 116, 1009, doi: 10.1086/300499

    1998 doi

  76. [84]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Li, W., et al. 1999, AJ, 118, 2675, doi: 10.1086/301143

    1999 doi

  77. [85]

    2025a, A&A, 694, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450388

    Rigault, M., Smith, M., Goobar, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 694, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450388

    doi

  78. [86]

    2025b, A&A, 694, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450377

    Rigault, M., Smith, M., Regnault, N., et al. 2025b, A&A, 694, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450377

    doi

  79. [87]

    2026, Not All Who Wander Are Lost: Early Excess Demographics in the Volume-limited ZTF DR2 SN Ia Sample, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.14437

    Rojas-Bravo, C., Sun, N.-C., Smith, M., et al. 2026, Not All Who Wander Are Lost: Early Excess Demographics in the Volume-limited ZTF DR2 SN Ia Sample, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.14437

    2026 doi arXiv

  80. [88]

    J., & Seitenzahl, I

    Ruiter, A. J., & Seitenzahl, I. R. 2025, A&ARv, 33, 1, doi: 10.1007/s00159-024-00158-9

    2025 doi

  81. [89]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 3541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1525

    Sai, H., Wang, X., Elias-Rosa, N., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3541, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1525

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    Sarin, N., H¨ ubner, M., Omand, C. M. B., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 1203, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1238

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    2026, Lightcurve Modelling of 2,205 ZTF DR2 Type Ia Supernovae: Implications for SN Ia Physics and Cosmology, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02677

    Sarin, N., Lindsj¨ o, E., Kelsey, L., et al. 2026, Lightcurve Modelling of 2,205 ZTF DR2 Type Ia Supernovae: Implications for SN Ia Physics and Cosmology, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.02677

    2026 doi

  84. [92]

    A., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al

    Scalzo, R. A., Aldering, G., Antilogus, P., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 1498, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu350

    2014 doi

  85. [93]

    A., Parent, E., Burns, C., et al

    Scalzo, R. A., Parent, E., Burns, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 628, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3178

    2019 doi

  86. [94]

    J., & Bildsten, L

    Shen, K. J., & Bildsten, L. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1365, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1365

    2009 doi

  87. [95]

    J., Boos, S

    Shen, K. J., Boos, S. J., Townsley, D. M., & Kasen, D. 2021, ApJ, 922, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2304

    2021 doi

  88. [96]

    R., Kwok, L

    Siebert, M. R., Kwok, L. A., Johansson, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 960, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0975

    2023 doi

  89. [97]

    A., Jha, S

    Singh, M., Kwok, L. A., Jha, S. W., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 227, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4318

    2026 doi

  90. [98]

    J., Huber, M

    Srivastav, S., Smartt, S. J., Huber, M. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb2ce

    2023 doi

  91. [99]

    D., Shappee, B

    Stritzinger, M. D., Shappee, B. J., Piro, A. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aadd46

    2018 doi

  92. [100]

    2019, MNRAS, stz1977, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1977 The Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Taubenberger, S., Floers, A., Vogl, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, stz1977, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1977 The Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, Astron. Astrophys., 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 The Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A...

    2019 doi

  93. [101]

    M., Miles, B

    Townsley, D. M., Miles, B. J., Shen, K. J., & Kasen, D. 2019, ApJ, 878, L38, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab27cd

    2019 doi

  94. [102]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0edb

    Wang, Q., Rest, A., Dimitriadis, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0edb

    2024 doi

  95. [103]

    2025, ApJ, 991, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf05a

    Wu, W., Jiang, J.-a., Meng, D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 148, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf05a

    2025 doi

  96. [104]

    2026, WFST Supernovae in the First Year: I

    Wu, W., Jiang, J.-a., Xu, Z., et al. 2026, WFST Supernovae in the First Year: I. Statistical Study of 16 Early-phase Type Ia Supernovae from the Pilot Survey, arXiv, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.17268

    2026 doi

  97. [105]

    A., Kulkarni, S

    Yao, Y., Miller, A. A., Kulkarni, S. R., et al. 2019, ApJ, 886, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4cf5

    2019 doi

  98. [106]

    O., Hoogendam, W

    Ye, C., Jones, D. O., Hoogendam, W. B., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 164, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c3d

    2024 doi

  99. [107]

    L., & Filippenko, A

    Zheng, W., Kelly, P. L., & Filippenko, A. V. 2017, ApJ, 848, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b19

    2017 doi

  100. [108]

    M., Filippenko, A

    Zheng, W., Silverman, J. M., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, L15, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/778/1/L15

    2013 doi

  101. [109]

    V., et al

    Zheng, W., Shivvers, I., Filippenko, A. V., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, L24, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L24

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.