pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00137 · v1 · pith:CRG73U3Znew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

Cosmology with a Non-minimally Coupled Dark Matter Fluid II. Cosmological Perturbations

Samuele Silveravalle , Andrea Lapi , Francesco Benetti , Stefano Liberati This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 17:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO
keywords non-minimal couplingdark matter fluidcosmological perturbationsbouncing cosmologyscale-invariant spectrumprimordial fluctuationstensor-to-scalar ratiocontracting phase
0
0 comments X

The pith

In bouncing solutions with non-minimally coupled dark matter, primordial fluctuations from the contracting phase produce an approximately scale-invariant scalar power spectrum compatible with current bounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends prior work on a dark matter fluid that couples non-minimally to gravity by deriving the linear perturbation equations and solving them in the relevant regimes. Perturbations seeded during the early accelerated expansion phase yield a strongly blue scalar spectrum ruled out by data, but in the presence of spatial curvature the model instead permits a bounce where fluctuations generated in the pre-bounce contraction are nearly scale-invariant. The tensor-to-scalar ratio stays within observational limits and no extra scalar fields are required. A reader would care because the setup supplies an alternative route to primordial structure formation that simultaneously solves the horizon and flatness problems through the same fluid interaction.

Core claim

In the bouncing solutions the model yields an approximately scale-invariant scalar power spectrum while keeping the tensor-to-scalar ratio compatible with current bounds, without introducing additional scalar fields; perturbations generated during the accelerated expansion phase instead produce a strongly blue spectrum incompatible with observations.

What carries the argument

Analytic solutions for the scalar, vector and tensor perturbation equations in the contracting phase of bouncing cosmologies driven by the non-minimally coupled dark matter fluid.

If this is right

  • Perturbations during the accelerated expansion phase are ruled out by the blue spectrum they produce.
  • Bouncing solutions allow the same non-minimal coupling to generate viable primordial fluctuations.
  • The tensor-to-scalar ratio remains small enough to satisfy existing bounds.
  • No additional scalar fields are needed to obtain a scale-invariant spectrum.
  • The model continues to address the horizon and flatness problems through the early acceleration and the bounce.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fluid coupling might be tested in other modified-gravity scenarios that also produce bounces.
  • Refining the approximations could allow direct numerical integration of the mode equations across the bounce.
  • Future CMB polarization data could further constrain the allowed range of the coupling strength.
  • The approach may be compared with other single-fluid alternatives to inflation that rely on contraction rather than expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation and solution of the perturbation equations rely on simplifying approximations that must be refined.

What would settle it

A future measurement showing the scalar spectral index far from unity or the tensor-to-scalar ratio above current upper limits in the CMB would rule out the bouncing-solution predictions.

read the original abstract

We extend our study of a cosmological scenario in which dark matter is non-minimally coupled to gravity at the fluid level. In previous work, we showed that this interaction can drive an early phase of accelerated expansion, addressing the horizon and flatness problems, and can also lead to a cosmological bounce in the presence of spatial curvature. Here we analyse the evolution of linear perturbations in this framework. We derive the equations governing scalar, vector and tensor perturbations, and obtain analytic solutions in the relevant cosmological regimes. We find that perturbations generated during the accelerated expansion phase produce a strongly blue scalar power spectrum and are therefore incompatible with observations. By contrast, in bouncing solutions primordial fluctuations can originate during the contracting phase before the bounce. In this case, the model yields an approximately scale-invariant scalar power spectrum while keeping the tensor-to-scalar ratio compatible with current bounds, without introducing additional scalar fields. Although our treatment relies on simplifying approximations that should be refined in future work, these results indicate that non-minimally coupled dark matter may provide a viable alternative mechanism for the generation of primordial cosmological perturbations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends prior work on a non-minimally coupled dark matter fluid to the analysis of linear cosmological perturbations. It derives the governing equations for scalar, vector, and tensor modes and obtains analytic solutions in the relevant regimes. The central claim is that perturbations generated during the contracting phase of bouncing solutions produce an approximately scale-invariant scalar power spectrum with a tensor-to-scalar ratio compatible with current bounds, without additional scalar fields; perturbations from the accelerated expansion phase are ruled out as they yield a strongly blue spectrum. The analysis is explicitly conditioned on simplifying approximations.

Significance. If the approximations prove robust, the work supplies an alternative mechanism for generating primordial fluctuations in bouncing cosmologies that relies solely on the non-minimally coupled dark matter component. It simultaneously addresses the horizon and flatness problems via early acceleration and a bounce. The derivation of analytic solutions for the perturbation modes is a clear technical strength, and the explicit conditioning of the scale-invariant result on the approximations avoids hidden assumptions. The absence of extra scalar fields distinguishes the approach from standard inflationary constructions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Analytic solutions for scalar modes in the contracting phase (and associated discussion of approximations)] The claim of an approximately scale-invariant scalar power spectrum (and its observational compatibility) rests on analytic solutions obtained under simplifying approximations in the contracting phase. The manuscript does not demonstrate or quantify the validity of these approximations or their impact on the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the model provides a viable alternative mechanism.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of perturbation equations] The notation for the non-minimal coupling function and its derivatives could be made more uniform across the perturbation equations to improve readability.
  2. [Results for bouncing solutions] A brief comparison table of the obtained spectral index and r values against current observational bounds would help readers assess the compatibility claim at a glance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and for recognizing the technical strengths of the analytic derivations. We address the single major comment below, agreeing that further quantification of the approximations is warranted to support the central claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Analytic solutions for scalar modes in the contracting phase (and associated discussion of approximations)] The claim of an approximately scale-invariant scalar power spectrum (and its observational compatibility) rests on analytic solutions obtained under simplifying approximations in the contracting phase. The manuscript does not demonstrate or quantify the validity of these approximations or their impact on the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio, which is load-bearing for the central claim that the model provides a viable alternative mechanism.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit quantification of the approximations' domain of validity and their effect on the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (likely in Section 4) that (i) states the precise conditions under which the analytic solutions hold, (ii) provides order-of-magnitude estimates or comparisons with limiting numerical integrations to bound the error on n_s and r, and (iii) discusses how moderate violations of the approximations would shift the predicted observables. This addition will make the load-bearing character of the result fully transparent without altering the analytic character of the treatment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the linear perturbation equations directly from the non-minimally coupled fluid action and background evolution established in prior work. Analytic solutions for scalar modes in the contracting phase are obtained by solving the resulting differential equations under stated approximations, yielding an approximately scale-invariant spectrum as a consequence of the mode evolution rather than by construction or fitting. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation that is itself unverified, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or an ansatz smuggled via citation. The tensor-to-scalar ratio compatibility is presented as a consistency check within the same framework. The central claim is explicitly conditioned on approximations, preserving independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Information is limited to the abstract; no explicit free parameters, detailed axioms or invented entities beyond the model coupling are provided.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory applies and yields analytic solutions in the relevant cosmological regimes
    Invoked to derive the governing equations for scalar, vector and tensor perturbations.
invented entities (1)
  • Non-minimally coupled dark matter fluid no independent evidence
    purpose: To drive early accelerated expansion or a cosmological bounce
    The model introduces this coupling at the fluid level to address horizon and flatness problems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1268 out tokens · 39130 ms · 2026-07-02T17:37:24.543670+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant.Astron. J., 116:1009–1038, 1998

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release

    Dan Scolnic et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release. Astrophys. J., 938(2):113, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    C. L. Bennett et al. Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results.Astrophys. J. Suppl., 208:20, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters.JCAP, 12:047, 2020

    Simone Aiola et al. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters.JCAP, 12:047, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Planck2018 results: Vi

    Aghanim et al. Planck2018 results: Vi. cosmological parameters.A&A, 641:A6, September 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Dutcher et al

    D. Dutcher et al. Measurements of the E-mode polarization and temperature-E-mode correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 data.Phys. Rev. D, 104(2):022003, 2021

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Perlmutter et al

    S. Perlmutter et al. Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae.Astrophys. J., 517:565–586, 1999

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints.Astrophys

    Dillon Brout et al. The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints.Astrophys. J., 938(2):110, 2022

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set.Astrophys. J. Lett., 973(1):L14, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements

    Éric Aubourg et al. Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements. Phys. Rev. D, 92(12):123516, 2015. – 27 –

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample.Mon

    Shadab Alam et al. The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 470(3):2617–2652, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory.Phys

    Shadab Alam et al. Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory.Phys. Rev. D, 103(8):083533, 2021

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    A. G. Adame et al. DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations.JCAP, 02:021, 2025

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z<1.Mon

    Chris Blake et al. The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z<1.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 425:405–414, 2012

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Heath Jones, Lister Staveley-Smith, Gregory B

    Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D. Heath Jones, Lister Staveley-Smith, Gregory B. Poole, Lachlan Campbell, Quentin Parker, Will Saunders, and Fred Watson. The 6dF Galaxy Survey:z≈0measurement of the growth rate andσ 8.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 423:3430–3444, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound)

    Teppei Okumura et al. The Subaru FMOS galaxy redshift survey (FastSound). IV. New constraint on gravity theory from redshift space distortions atz∼1.4.Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap., 68(3):38, 2016

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Pezzotta et al

    A. Pezzotta et al. The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): The growth of structure at0.5< z <1.2from redshift-space distortions in the clustering of the PDR-2 final sample.Astron. Astrophys., 604:A33, 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Lucey, and Michael J

    Khaled Said, Matthew Colless, Christina Magoulas, John R. Lucey, and Michael J. Hudson. Joint analysis of 6dFGS and SDSS peculiar velocities for the growth rate of cosmic structure and tests of gravity.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 497(1):1275–1293, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Michael S. Turner. The Road to Precision Cosmology. 1 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Simon D. M. White, Julio F. Navarro, August E. Evrard, and Carlos S. Frenk. The Baryon content of galaxy clusters: A Challenge to cosmological orthodoxy.Nature, 366:429–433, 1993

    work page 1993

  21. [21]

    Mantz et al

    Adam B. Mantz et al. Cosmological constraints from gas mass fractions of massive, relaxed galaxy clusters.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 510(1):131–145, 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Ghirardini et al

    V. Ghirardini et al. The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey - Cosmology constraints from cluster abundances in the western Galactic hemisphere.Astron. Astrophys., 689:A298, 2024

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Mota, Adam G

    Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, Luca Visinelli, Weiqiang Yang, Alessandro Melchiorri, David F. Mota, Adam G. Riess, and Joseph Silk. In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions.Class. Quant. Grav., 38(15):153001, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant. Astrophys. J., 826(1):56, 2016

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H0.Astrophys. J., 977(1):120, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments.Mon

    Catherine Heymans et al. CFHTLenS tomographic weak lensing cosmological parameter constraints: Mitigating the impact of intrinsic galaxy alignments.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 432:2433, 2013

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Cosmology Intertwined III:f σ8 andS 8.Astropart

    Eleonora Di Valentino et al. Cosmology Intertwined III:f σ8 andS 8.Astropart. Phys., 131:102604, 2021

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    L. F. Secco et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty.Phys. Rev. D, 105(2):023515, 2022. – 28 –

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Allen, August E

    Steven W. Allen, August E. Evrard, and Adam B. Mantz. Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters.ARA&A, 49(1):409–470, September 2011

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    V. C. Rubin, Jr. Ford, W. K., and N. Thonnard. Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc). ApJ, 238:471–487, June 1980

    work page 1980

  31. [31]

    The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies — I

    Massimo Persic, Paolo Salucci, and Fulvio Stel. The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies — I. The dark matter connection.MNRAS, 281(1):27–47, July 1996

    work page 1996

  32. [32]

    C.L. et Al. Bennett. First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results.ApJs, 148(1):1–27, September 2003

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Olive, and Evan D

    Erik Aver, Keith A. Olive, and Evan D. Skillman. The effects of He Iλ10830 on helium abundance determinations.JCAP, 2015(7):011–011, July 2015

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    D. M. Scolnic et al. The Complete Light-curve Sample of Spectroscopically Confirmed SNe Ia from Pan-STARRS1 and Cosmological Constraints from the Combined Pantheon Sample. Astrophys. J., 859(2):101, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    The XXL survey

    Garrel Christian et Al. The XXL survey. XLVI. Forward cosmological analysis of the C1 cluster sample.A&A, 663:A3, July 2022

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Douglas et Al. Clowe. A Direct Empirical Proof of the Existence of Dark Matter.ApJl, 648(2):L109–L113, September 2006

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Paraficz D. et Al. The Bullet cluster at its best: weighing stars, gas, and dark matter.A&A, 594:A121, October 2016

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Duffy and Karl van Bibber

    Leanne D. Duffy and Karl van Bibber. Axions as Dark Matter Particles.New J. Phys., 11:105008, 2009

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Francesca Chadha-Day, John Ellis, and David J. E. Marsh. Axion dark matter: What is it and why now?Sci. Adv., 8(8):abj3618, 2022

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter

    Bernard Carr, Florian Kuhnel, and Marit Sandstad. Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. D, 94(8):083504, 2016

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Anne M. Green. Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview.Nucl. Phys. B, 1003:116494, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Aprile E. et Al. Dark matter search results from a one ton-year exposure of xenon1t.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:111302, Sep 2018

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Meng Yue et. Al. Dark matter search results from the pandax-4t commissioning run.Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:261802, Dec 2021

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Aalbers J. et Al. First dark matter search results from the lux-zeplin (lz) experiment.Physical Review Letters, 131(4), July 2023

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies.Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982

    work page 1982

  46. [46]

    Hertzberg

    Mark P. Hertzberg. On Inflation with Non-minimal Coupling.JHEP, 11:023, 2010

    work page 2010

  47. [47]

    Dark matter as a Bose-Einstein Condensate: the relativistic non-minimally coupled case.JCAP, 2014(2):004, February 2014

    Dario Bettoni, Mattia Colombo, and Stefano Liberati. Dark matter as a Bose-Einstein Condensate: the relativistic non-minimally coupled case.JCAP, 2014(2):004, February 2014

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    ExtendedΛCDM: generalized non-minimal coupling for dark matter fluids.JCAP, 2011(11):007, November 2011

    Dario Bettoni, Stefano Liberati, and Lorenzo Sindoni. ExtendedΛCDM: generalized non-minimal coupling for dark matter fluids.JCAP, 2011(11):007, November 2011

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Non-minimally coupled dark matter: effective pressure and structure formation.JCAP, 2012(7):027, July 2012

    Dario Bettoni, Valeria Pettorino, Stefano Liberati, and Carlo Baccigalupi. Non-minimally coupled dark matter: effective pressure and structure formation.JCAP, 2012(7):027, July 2012

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    Disformal invariance of second order scalar-tensor theories: Framing the Horndeski action.Phys

    Dario Bettoni and Stefano Liberati. Disformal invariance of second order scalar-tensor theories: Framing the Horndeski action.Phys. Rev. D, 88:084020, 2013. – 29 –

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    Dynamics of non-minimally coupled perfect fluids.JCAP, 2015(8):023–023, August 2015

    Dario Bettoni and Stefano Liberati. Dynamics of non-minimally coupled perfect fluids.JCAP, 2015(8):023–023, August 2015

    work page 2015

  52. [52]

    Self-gravitating Equilibria of Non-minimally Coupled Dark Matter Halos.ApJ, 910(1):76, March 2021

    Giovanni Gandolfi, Andrea Lapi, and Stefano Liberati. Self-gravitating Equilibria of Non-minimally Coupled Dark Matter Halos.ApJ, 910(1):76, March 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Empirical Evidence of Nonminimally Coupled Dark Matter in the Dynamics of Local Spiral Galaxies?ApJ, 929(1):48, April 2022

    Giovanni Gandolfi, Andrea Lapi, and Stefano Liberati. Empirical Evidence of Nonminimally Coupled Dark Matter in the Dynamics of Local Spiral Galaxies?ApJ, 929(1):48, April 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Haridasu, Stefano Liberati, and Andrea Lapi

    Giovanni Gandolfi, Balakrishna S. Haridasu, Stefano Liberati, and Andrea Lapi. Looking for Traces of Nonminimally Coupled Dark Matter in the X-COP Galaxy Clusters Sample.ApJ, 952(2):105, August 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Ultra-compact objects of non-minimally coupled dark matter.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025(03):029, mar 2025

    Francesco Benetti, Andrea Lapi, Samuele Silveravalle, and Stefano Liberati. Ultra-compact objects of non-minimally coupled dark matter.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2025(03):029, mar 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Cosmology with a non-minimally coupled dark matter fluid

    Samuele Silveravalle, Andrea Lapi, Francesco Benetti, and Stefano Liberati. Cosmology with a non-minimally coupled dark matter fluid. Part I. Background evolution.JCAP, 11:067, 2025

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    World Scientific Publishing, 2019

    Jan Kretzschmar.Standard Model physics at the LHC, pages 153–171. World Scientific Publishing, 2019

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Mukhanov, H

    Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and Robert H. Brandenberger. Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions.Phys. Rept., 215:203–333, 1992

    work page 1992

  59. [59]

    Mukhanov

    Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov. Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations. Sov. Phys. JETP, 67:1297–1302, 1988

    work page 1988

  60. [60]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies. Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 360:117–134, 1978

    work page 1978

  61. [61]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    On the generation of a scale invariant spectrum of adiabatic fluctuations in cosmological models with a contracting phase.Phys

    Fabio Finelli and Robert Brandenberger. On the generation of a scale invariant spectrum of adiabatic fluctuations in cosmological models with a contracting phase.Phys. Rev. D, 65:103522, 2002

    work page 2002

  63. [63]

    Brandenberger

    Robert H. Brandenberger. The Matter Bounce Alternative to Inflationary Cosmology. 6 2012

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Oxford University Press, 2008

    Steven Weinberg.Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2008

    work page 2008

  65. [65]

    Cambridge University Press, 7 2022

    Daniel Baumann.Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, 7 2022. – 30 –

    work page 2022