pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00167 · v1 · pith:DXN6CND5new · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

How can we finally see the first light? Status and perspective in the search for Population III stars

Alessandra Venditti , Daniel Schaerer , Erik Zackrisson , Yoshihisa Asada , Harley Katz , Stefania Salvadori , Eros Vanzella , Julian B. Mu\~noz
show 21 more authors
Anatole Storck Andrew J. Bunker Alessandro Trinca Dirk Scholte Fabio Pacucci Pablo G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez Seiji Fujimoto Corinne Charbonnel Roberto Maiolino Andrea Ferrara Mauro Giavalisco Raffaella Schneider Josephine Baggen Hakim Atek Volker Bromm Karina Caputi Laure Ciesla Pratika Dayal Chiaki Kobayashi Marco Castellano Paola Santini
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 17:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords Population III starsfirst starshigh-redshift galaxiesJWST spectroscopystellar archaeologycosmic dawnmetal-poor starsearly universe
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multiple search methods are narrowing the allowed properties of the first stars and preparing for their detection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review paper lays out theoretical expectations for how the first stars formed and the main ways astronomers are trying to find them. It covers near-field studies of metal-poor stars, searches for unusual spectral signatures at high redshift, and the use of lensing and time-domain observations. The central argument is that JWST spectroscopy together with lensing surveys, stellar archaeology, absorption-line work, and better simulations are already producing candidates and shrinking the range of possible first-star characteristics. If these efforts succeed they would connect the earliest star formation to the later enrichment of the universe with heavier elements.

Core claim

The review states that the combination of JWST spectroscopy, time-domain searches, lensing surveys, stellar archaeology, absorption-line studies, and improved simulations is yielding a growing number of observational candidates and narrowing the allowed parameter space for the first stars, setting the stage for a golden era of Pop III searches.

What carries the argument

The coordinated use of JWST spectroscopy with lensing surveys, time-domain monitoring, stellar archaeology, and absorption-line studies to detect peculiar spectral features or extremely metal-poor systems.

If this is right

  • Near-field cosmology can place tighter limits on the initial mass function and formation sites of the first stars.
  • Hard-ionizing spectral signatures at intermediate and high redshifts can be used to constrain the timing of the transition to metal-enriched star formation.
  • Absorption-line studies along lines of sight to distant quasars can map the topology of early metal enrichment.
  • Time-domain and lensing surveys will identify rare, magnified systems where Pop III activity may be detectable up to Cosmic Dawn.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmed Pop III candidates would allow direct tests of whether the first stars formed in isolation or in small clusters.
  • The narrowing of parameter space could guide which specific wavelength ranges or line ratios future instruments should prioritize.
  • If no signatures appear, the field may shift emphasis toward indirect constraints from the reionization history and metal-poor halo stars.

Load-bearing premise

The peculiar spectral features or other signatures of Population III stars can still be observed despite their short lifetimes and low brightness.

What would settle it

Deep JWST and lensing surveys that return no convincing Pop III candidates or hard-ionizing signatures after several years of targeted observations would indicate that the direct-search strategies are not viable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00167 by Alessandra Venditti, Alessandro Trinca, Anatole Storck, Andrea Ferrara, Andrew J. Bunker, Chiaki Kobayashi, Corinne Charbonnel, Daniel Schaerer, Dirk Scholte, Erik Zackrisson, Eros Vanzella, Fabio Pacucci, Hakim Atek, Harley Katz, Josephine Baggen, Julian B. Mu\~noz, Karina Caputi, Laure Ciesla, Marco Castellano, Mauro Giavalisco, Pablo G. P\'erez-Gonz\'alez, Paola Santini, Pratika Dayal, Raffaella Schneider, Roberto Maiolino, Seiji Fujimoto, Stefania Salvadori, Volker Bromm, Yoshihisa Asada.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: — Compilation of predictions on the Pop III IMF from simulations ([1] Wollenberg et al. 2020, [2] Prole et al. 2022, [3] Jaura et al. 2022, [4] Stacy & Bromm 2013, [5] Hirano et al. 2015, [6] Hirano et al. 2014, colored, solid lines), from Klessen & Glover (2023). Models that include stellar feedback from the central proto-star (e.g. [3], [5], [6]) predict larger stellar masses on average. However results … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: — Carbon enhancement ([C/Fe]) vs metallicity ([Fe/H]) re￾sulting from Pop III SN enrichment episodes with an increasing explo￾sion energy (from left to right), when considering an incremental level of contamination from subse￾quent generations of Pop II stars (from yellow to purple), adapted from Vanni et al. (2023a). 1 Sink particles are a numerical technique used to represent unresolved, high-density gas… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: — Confidence levels at which a Pop III IMF with given peak mass and slope can be excluded based on (i) the non-detection of mono-enriched PISNe descendants in the SAGA catalog (Suda et al. 2008, 2017) at [Fe/H] < −2.5 (red contours), and (ii) the as￾sumption of a PISN origin interpretation for the J1010+2358 star, discovered among 15000 very-metal-poor LAMOST stars (blue/green contours), derived from a sta… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: — Log(O/Ar) vs 12+Log(Ar/H) for 11 star-forming galaxies at z ≈ 1.3 − 7.7 (stars) and two candidate AGN hosts at z ≈ 4.5 (cir￾cles), colored by their redshift. The green and blue lines respectively show the sequence of mean values of low-redshift (z < 0.3) low-mass (⟨Log(M⋆/M⊙)⟩ = 7.23) and higher-mass (⟨Log(M⋆/M⊙)⟩ = 9.41) galaxies from the SDSS survey (Bhattacharya et al. 2025b), adopted from Bhattachary… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: — Mass-metallicity rela￾tion at z > 3 from Bolamperti et al. (2026), including low-mass, star-forming complexes with un￾detected metal lines that indicate metallicities ≲ 8×10−3 Z⊙ (LAP2, Vanzella et al. 2026, AMORE6, Morishita et al. 2025; Messa et al. 2026, Hebe Maiolino et al. 2026; Ubler et al. ¨ 2026 and MPG-CR3, Cai et al. 2025 from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: — Mass-metallicity relation from deep observations behind the GLIMPSE-D cluster, compared with predictions from A-SLOTH simulations (Liu et al. 2025). The simulations indicate a dominant fast-enrichment (“overshoot”) channel immediately after the first Pop III star-formation episode (blue arrow), resulting in metal-rich galaxies at the low-mass end as in the example of the top-right inset; rare cases of sl… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: — Pop III SFRD evolution as a function of redshift accord￾ing to various models and simulations (listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: — Example spectrum of a theoretical z = 8 Pop III galaxy (grey), assuming a top-heavy Salpeter-like IMF in the range [50, 500] M⊙ at the nominal stellar mass M⋆ = 106 M⊙ from the Yggdrasil model (Zackrisson et al. 2011), observed 0.01 Myr after an instantaneous starburst (Trussler et al. 2023); typical spectral-hardness features associated with Pop III-dominated spectra are highlighted in the figure (see t… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: — Left: schematic representation of the evolutionary stages of a Pop III-hosting galaxy, based on the ratio between Pop III (M⋆,PopIII) and total (M⋆,tot) stellar mass, with the Pop III-dominated phase (M⋆,PopIII > 50%M⋆,tot, encompassing a brief, “truly pristine” stage, a “self-polluted, Pop III-pure” stage, and a “Pop III-rich” stage in hybrid galaxies that also host a coeval Pop II component) lasting a… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: — Pop III UVLF observational constraints at 5.5 ≲ z ≲ 6.5, based on the detection of a single Pop III galaxy candidate (the AMORE6 galaxy at z ≈ 5.7, Morishita et al. 2024) when apply￾ing a NIRCam-based selection criterion (aimed at identifying “pure” Pop III systems through prominent-Hα/deficient-[OIII] line diagnos￾tics) to ten JWST legacy fields. Adopted from Fujimoto et al. (2025b). Despite all these … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: — Left: Integrated HeII line luminosity at 1640 ˚A (LHeII1640) vs 4686 ˚A (LHeII4686) arising from massive halos (Mvir ≳ 1011 M⊙, M⋆ ≳ 109 M⊙) at z ≈ 6.5−9 that host a sub-dominant Pop III component, from the dustyGadget simulation suite (Graziani et al. 2020; Di Cesare et al. 2023; Venditti et al. 2023) (red circles), compared with contributions from the dominant Pop II component in these halos, as well … view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: — Left: continuum-subtracted map of the HeII emission at the redshift of Hebe in the halo of GN-z11, with contours indicating 3σ (thin), 4σ and 5σ (thick) levels, and the white circle the location of GN-z11. Right: Hebe’s spectrum around the wavelength of the HeII1640 (top) and Hγ lines (bottom, from Ubler et al. ¨ 2026), with colored lines showing the simultaneous fit of two spectrally resolved component… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Finding the first (Population III or Pop III) stars is one of the fundamental quests of astronomy, aiming to deliver the missing link in how stars form at early cosmic times. Yet their initial mass function, formation sites and feedback remain highly uncertain, as well as the timing and topology of the transition to metal-enriched star formation. The observability of their peculiar spectral features is also debated, due to their short lifetime and faintness. This review summarizes current theoretical expectations for Pop III star formation, and the main observational strategies that have been adopted to constrain their properties across cosmic time, including near-field cosmology studies, direct searches for extremely metal-poor star-forming complexes and/or hard-ionizing spectral signatures at high and intermediate redshifts, and prospects for identifying Pop III activity up to Cosmic Dawn. The combination of JWST spectroscopy, time-domain searches, lensing surveys, stellar archaeology, absorption-line studies, as well as improved simulations, is yielding a growing number of observational candidates and narrowing the allowed parameter space for the first stars, setting the stage for a ``golden era'' of Pop III searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review summarizes theoretical expectations for Population III star formation, including uncertainties in the IMF, formation sites, feedback, and the transition to metal-enriched star formation. It reviews observational strategies such as near-field cosmology, direct searches for extremely metal-poor complexes and hard-ionizing signatures at high and intermediate redshifts, JWST spectroscopy, time-domain searches, lensing surveys, stellar archaeology, and absorption-line studies, concluding that their combination is yielding observational candidates and narrowing the allowed parameter space for the first stars.

Significance. If the synthesis holds, the review provides a balanced, up-to-date overview of converging multi-method efforts in early-universe astrophysics. It explicitly notes the ongoing debate on observability due to short lifetimes and faintness, which strengthens its utility for guiding future observations and simulations toward Cosmic Dawn.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the listed methods are 'yielding a growing number of observational candidates' is central to the review's forward-looking claim; adding one or two concrete, referenced examples from the main text would make this assertion more traceable for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition that it provides a balanced, up-to-date overview of converging efforts in early-universe astrophysics and notes the ongoing debate on observability. We appreciate the recommendation for minor revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no derivations, predictions or self-referential claims

full rationale

This is a literature review summarizing theoretical expectations, observational strategies, and existing candidates from JWST and other facilities. No equations, fitted parameters, uniqueness theorems, or quantitative predictions appear that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. The central statement that multiple methods are 'narrowing the allowed parameter space' is presented as a synthesis of external results rather than a derived claim internal to the paper. No load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are invoked to justify the review's own conclusions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; the abstract introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5857 in / 1073 out tokens · 41605 ms · 2026-07-02T17:55:56.954353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 299 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    L., Coe, D., et al

    Abdurro’uf, Larson, R. L., Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 47, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001 2024

  2. [2]

    2002, Ap&SS, 281, 471, doi:10.1023/A:1019509211972

    Abel, T. 2002, Ap&SS, 281, 471, doi:10.1023/A:1019509211972

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1019509211972 2002

  3. [3]

    Science , eprint =

    Abel, T., Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. 2002, Science, 295, 93, doi:10.1126/science.1063991

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1063991 2002

  4. [4]

    L., Zackrisson, E., et al

    Agarwal, B., Johnson, J. L., Zackrisson, E., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 4003, doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1173

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1173 2016

  5. [5]

    2018a, ApJ, 854, L34, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaadb8

    Rebolo, R. 2018a, ApJ, 854, L34, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaadb8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaadb8 2041

  6. [6]

    2018b, ApJ, 852, L20, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa23a —

    Rebolo, R. 2018b, ApJ, 852, L20, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa23a —. 2019, ApJ, 874, L21, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1076 21

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa23a 2041

  7. [7]

    S., Caffau, E., Molaro, P., et al

    Aguado, D. S., Caffau, E., Molaro, P., et al. 2023a, A&A, 669, L4, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245392

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245392

  8. [8]

    S., Salvadori, S., Sk´ ulad´ ottir,´A., et al

    Aguado, D. S., Salvadori, S., Sk´ ulad´ ottir,´A., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 520, 866, doi:10.1093/mnras/stad164 ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Colina, L., Crespo-Gomez, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02323, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.02323

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad164 2026

  9. [9]

    C., Honda, S., & Lee, Y

    Aoki, W., Tominaga, N., Beers, T. C., Honda, S., & Lee, Y. S. 2014, Science, 345, 912, doi:10.1126/science.1252633 Arellano-C´ ordova, K. Z., Berg, D. A., Mingozzi, M., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 1588, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1723 Arellano-C´ ordova, K. Z., M´ endez-Delgado, J. E., Flury, S. R., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 547, stag380, doi:10.1093/mnras/stag380

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1252633 2014

  10. [10]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.20045

    Asada, Y., Fujimoto, S., Chisholm, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.20045

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20045 2026

  11. [11]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07542, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.07542

    Atek, H., Chisholm, J., Kokorev, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.07542, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.07542

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07542 2025

  12. [12]

    2001, Phys

    Barkana, R., & Loeb, A. 2001, Phys. Rep., 349, 125, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00019-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00019-9 2001

  13. [13]

    2018, ARA&A, 56, 83, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051839

    Bastian, N., & Lardo, C. 2018, ARA&A, 56, 83, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051839

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051839 2018

  14. [14]

    R., Bonnell, I

    Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., & Price, N. M. 1995, MNRAS, 277, 362, doi:10.1093/mnras/277.2.362

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/277.2.362 1995

  15. [15]

    C., & Christlieb, N

    Beers, T. C., & Christlieb, N. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 531, doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057 2005

  16. [16]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, L26, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad108

    Bekki, K., & Tsujimoto, T. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L26, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad108

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad108 2023

  17. [17]

    S., & Sijacki, D

    Bennett, J. S., & Sijacki, D. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 597, doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2835

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2835 2020

  18. [18]

    A., Naidu, R

    Berg, D. A., Naidu, R. P., Chisholm, J., et al. 2026a, ApJ, 1003, 112, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e4c —. 2026b, ApJ, 1003, 112, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e4c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5e4c

  19. [19]

    L., & Kovetz, E

    Bernal, J. L., & Kovetz, E. D. 2022, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 30, 5, doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00143-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-022-00143-0 2022

  20. [20]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 92, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad66cf 2024

  21. [21]

    2025a, ApJ, 983, L30, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc735

    Saha, K. 2025a, ApJ, 983, L30, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc735

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc735 2041

  22. [22]

    Mass-dependent chemical enrichment sequences of SDSS star-forming galaxies out to z~0.3 revealed by direct O & Ar abundances

    Saha, K. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01896, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.01896

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.01896

  23. [23]

    A Cosmic Archipelago of lensed metal-poor galaxies at $z\sim6$

    Bolamperti, A., Messa, M., Zanella, A., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.02720, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.02720

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.02720 2026

  24. [24]

    2025, A&A Rev., 33, 2, doi:10.1007/s00159-025-00159-2

    Bonifacio, P., Caffau, E., Fran¸ cois, P., & Spite, M. 2025, A&A Rev., 33, 2, doi:10.1007/s00159-025-00159-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-025-00159-2 2025

  25. [25]

    2015, A&A, 579, A28, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425266

    Bonifacio, P., Caffau, E., Spite, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A28, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425266

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425266 2015

  26. [26]

    2021, A&A, 651, A79, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140816

    Bonifacio, P., Monaco, L., Salvadori, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A79, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140816 2021

  27. [27]

    J., Illingworth, G

    Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, L69, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/708/2/L69

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/708/2/l69 2010

  28. [28]

    Bowler, R. A. A., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 448, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx839 Bradaˇ c, M., Willott, C., Asada, Y., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.23668, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.23668

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stx839 2017

  29. [29]

    C., Stanway, E

    Bray, J. C., Stanway, E. R., & Eldridge, J. J. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 2087, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1348

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1348 2025

  30. [30]

    2013, Reports on Progress in Physics, 76, 112901, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901

    Bromm, V. 2013, Reports on Progress in Physics, 76, 112901, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/112901 2013

  31. [31]

    S., & Larson, R

    Bromm, V., Coppi, P. S., & Larson, R. B. 2002, ApJ, 564, 23, doi:10.1086/323947

    work page doi:10.1086/323947 2002

  32. [32]

    2001 , month =

    Bromm, V., Ferrara, A., Coppi, P. S., & Larson, R. B. 2001a, MNRAS, 328, 969, doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04915.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04915.x 2001

  33. [33]

    P., & Loeb, A

    Bromm, V., Kudritzki, R. P., & Loeb, A. 2001b, ApJ, 552, 464, doi:10.1086/320549

    work page doi:10.1086/320549

  34. [34]

    Bromm, V., & Larson, R. B. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 79, doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034 2004

  35. [35]

    2003, Nature, 425, 812, doi:10.1038/nature02071

    Bromm, V., & Loeb, A. 2003, Nature, 425, 812, doi:10.1038/nature02071

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02071 2003

  36. [36]

    Bromm, V., Yoshida, N., Hernquist, L., & McKee, C. F. 2009, Nature, 459, 49, doi:10.1038/nature07990

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07990 2009

  37. [37]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346159 2023

  38. [38]

    Busso, M., Gallino, R., & Wasserburg, G. J. 1999, ARA&A, 37, 239, doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239 1999

  39. [39]

    2011, Nature, 477, 67, doi:10.1038/nature10377 —

    Caffau, E., Bonifacio, P., Fran¸ cois, P., et al. 2011, Nature, 477, 67, doi:10.1038/nature10377 —. 2013, A&A, 560, A15, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322213

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10377 2011

  40. [40]

    2025, ApJ, 993, L52, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1608

    Cai, S., Li, M., Cai, Z., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, L52, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1608

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1608 2025

  41. [41]

    J., Katz, H., & Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., & Rey, M. P. 2023a, MNRAS, 522, L89, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad046

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad046

  42. [42]

    J., Katz, H., Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023b, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1579

  43. [43]

    J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Witten, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 523, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1547

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1547 2024

  44. [44]

    G., et al

    Cappelluti, N., Kashlinsky, A., Arendt, R. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 68, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/68

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/769/1/68 2013

  45. [45]

    2025, A&A, 696, A87, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452451

    Carniani, S., D’Eugenio, F., Ji, X., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A87, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452451

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452451 2025

  46. [46]

    2013, A&A, 556, A68, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220969

    Cassata, P., Le F` evre, O., Charlot, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A68, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220969

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220969 2013

  47. [47]

    1993, ApJS, 88, 509, doi:10.1086/191831

    Cassisi, S., & Castellani, V. 1993, ApJS, 88, 509, doi:10.1086/191831

    work page doi:10.1086/191831 1993

  48. [48]

    2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 143, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88 2024

  49. [49]

    2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 60281, doi:10.33232/001c.160281

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Moreschini, B., et al. 2026, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 9, 60281, doi:10.33232/001c.160281

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.160281 2026

  50. [50]

    Tracing nitrogen enrichment across cosmic time with JWST

    Cataldi, E., Belfiore, F., Curti, M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.07955, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.07955

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.07955 2025

  51. [51]

    2003 , month =

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi:10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  52. [52]

    2025, ApJ, 985, 24, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b5

    Chakraborty, P., Sarkar, A., Smith, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 24, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc7b5 2025

  53. [53]

    2023, A&A, 673, L7, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346410

    Charbonnel, C., Schaerer, D., Prantzos, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, L7, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346410

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346410 2023

  54. [54]

    Chatzopoulos, E., & Wheeler, J. C. 2012, ApJ, 748, 42, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/42

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/42 2012

  55. [55]

    2024, ApJ, 976, L15, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc9

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, L15, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc9 2024

  56. [56]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17506, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.17506

    Chiaki, G., Nozawa, T., Kobayashi, C., & Tominaga, N. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17506, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.17506

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.17506 2025

  57. [57]

    2013, ApJ, 765, L3, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L3

    Chiaki, G., Nozawa, T., & Yoshida, N. 2013, ApJ, 765, L3, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/L3

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/1/l3 2013

  58. [58]

    Chiaki, G., & Wise, J. H. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3933, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2984

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2984 2019

  59. [59]

    H., Marassi, S., et al

    Chiaki, G., Wise, J. H., Marassi, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 3149, doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2144

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2144 2020

  60. [60]

    2022, MNRAS, 510, 5199, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2799

    Chiaki, G., & Yoshida, N. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 5199, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2799

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2799 2022

  61. [61]

    2016, MNRAS, 463, 2781, doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2120

    Chiaki, G., Yoshida, N., & Hirano, S. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 2781, doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2120

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2120 2016

  62. [62]

    A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al

    Chisholm, J., Berg, D. A., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1004, L4, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6dae

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6dae 2026

  63. [63]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 2453, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1027

    Chon, S., Hosokawa, T., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2453, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1027

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1027 2024

  64. [64]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 4104, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty086

    Chon, S., Hosokawa, T., & Yoshida, N. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 4104, doi:10.1093/mnras/sty086

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty086 2018

  65. [65]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 2561, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf598

    Chon, S., & Omukai, K. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2561, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf598

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf598 2025

  66. [66]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4175, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2497

    Chon, S., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4175, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2497

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2497 2021

  67. [67]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 4639, doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1549

    Chon, S., Ono, H., Omukai, K., & Schneider, R. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 4639, doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1549

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1549 2022

  68. [68]

    2023, A&A, 680, A82, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347943

    Christensen, L., Jakobsen, P., Willott, C., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A82, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347943

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347943 2023

  69. [69]

    2003, Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 16, 191, doi:10.1002/9783527617647.ch8

    Christlieb, N. 2003, Reviews in Modern Astronomy, 16, 191, doi:10.1002/9783527617647.ch8

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527617647.ch8 2003

  70. [70]

    S., Beers, T

    Christlieb, N., Bessell, M. S., Beers, T. C., et al. 2002, Nature, 419, 904, doi:10.1038/nature01142

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01142 2002

  71. [71]

    2022, A&A, 666, A78, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142320

    Claeyssens, A., Richard, J., Blaizot, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A78, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142320

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142320 2022

  72. [72]

    C., Glover, S

    Clark, P. C., Glover, S. C. O., & Klessen, R. S. 2008, ApJ, 672, 757, doi:10.1086/524187

    work page doi:10.1086/524187 2008

  73. [73]

    C., Glover, S

    Clark, P. C., Glover, S. C. O., Klessen, R. S., & Bromm, V. 2011a, ApJ, 727, 110, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/727/2/110

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/727/2/110

  74. [74]

    C., Glover, S

    Clark, P. C., Glover, S. C. O., Smith, R. J., et al. 2011b, Science, 331, 1040, doi:10.1126/science.1198027

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1198027

  75. [75]

    J., Olivier, G

    Cleri, N. J., Olivier, G. M., Hutchison, T. A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 10, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde55 22

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde55 2023

  76. [76]

    2012, Nature, 491, 228, doi:10.1038/nature11521

    Cooke, J., Sullivan, M., Gal-Yam, A., et al. 2012, Nature, 491, 228, doi:10.1038/nature11521

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11521 2012

  77. [77]

    J., & Madau, P

    Cooke, R. J., & Madau, P. 2014, ApJ, 791, 116, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/116

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/791/2/116 2014

  78. [78]

    J., Pettini, M., & Steidel, C

    Cooke, R. J., Pettini, M., & Steidel, C. C. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 802, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx037 Correa Magnus, L., Smith, B. D., Khochfar, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 307, doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3167

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx037 2017

  79. [79]

    Cruz, H. A. G., Mu˜ noz, J. B., Sabti, N., & Kamionkowski, M. 2025, Phys. Rev. D, 111, 083503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.083503 2025

  80. [80]

    R., Hutter, A., Dayal, P., et al

    Cueto, E. R., Hutter, A., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A138, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349017

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349017 2024

Showing first 80 references.