Trust the Prior (or Not): Uncertainty-Aware Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation

Andrea Passerini; Daniele Ravanelli; Erich Robbi

Trust the Prior (or Not): Uncertainty-Aware Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An uncertainty-gated attention module lets anatomical priors guide abdominal aortic aneurysm thrombus segmentation only where visual evidence is weak.

desk verdict The abstract pairs patient-specific GMM normalization with uncertainty-gated attention to handle domain shifts in AAA thrombus segmentation, but supplies zero metrics or baselines so the SOTA and generalization claims cannot be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00201 v1 pith:CZWGZPU7 submitted 2026-06-30 cs.CV

Erich Robbi , Daniele Ravanelli , Andrea Passerini This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CV

keywords abdominalaorticaneurysmthrombussegmentationuncertaintyestimationanatomicalpriorsCTAimagingdomaingeneralizationattentionmechanismpatient-specificnormalization

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a patient-specific framework can improve segmentation of intraluminal thrombus by combining discriminative learning with anatomical priors that are applied selectively. It introduces intensity normalization via a Gaussian Mixture Model of local anatomy and an Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module that modulates prior influence based on voxel-wise confidence. A sympathetic reader would care because heterogeneous thrombus appearance and varying CTA protocols cause standard models to fail on data from new centers. If the approach holds, segmentation becomes more reliable for risk assessment while staying interpretable through explicit separation of visual and prior-based evidence.

What carries the argument

Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module that incorporates spatial priors while adaptively modulating their influence according to voxel-wise confidence

What would settle it

A direct comparison on external multi-center CTA data in which the full method shows no gain or a drop in performance relative to the same architecture without the uncertainty gating.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module incorporates spatial priors while adaptively modulating their influence according to voxel-wise confidence. This design allows for anatomical guidance in ambiguous regions while suppressing unreliable priors. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on in-distribution test data and substantially outperforms existing alternatives in generalization to external multi-center CTA data, while remaining interpretable through an explicit separation of visual and anatomical evidence.

Load-bearing premise

Voxel-wise model confidence can be computed reliably enough to correctly decide when anatomical priors should be trusted or suppressed without introducing new systematic errors in ambiguous regions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's main move is to normalize intensities per patient with a local GMM and then use an uncertainty-gated module to decide when to apply anatomical priors versus rely on image evidence. That combination targets a real issue in multi-center CTA data where contrast and thrombus appearance vary. The explicit split between visual and prior signals is a clean design choice that could help interpretability.

The abstract claims state-of-the-art in-distribution results and clear gains on external centers, yet it gives no Dice scores, no dataset sizes, no baseline names, and no ablation on the gating itself. Without those, it is impossible to tell whether the uncertainty estimates are calibrated enough to avoid the exact failure mode the stress-test note flags: over- or under-trusting priors in low-contrast thrombus. The description of how uncertainty is computed is also missing.

The idea itself is straightforward and addresses a practical bottleneck, but the lack of any quantitative support in the provided text leaves the central claims unverified. If the full manuscript contains the experiments, ablations, and statistical checks, the work could be worth a closer look for groups working on prior-injection or uncertainty in medical segmentation. If those details are absent or weak, the paper stays at the level of a plausible but untested proposal.

I would bring this to a reading group only if the full version is available. I would not cite it yet. A serious editor should send it to review to see whether the promised results actually hold, rather than desk-reject on the abstract alone.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a patient-specific segmentation framework for intraluminal thrombus in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm CTA images. It combines a Gaussian Mixture Model for patient-specific intensity normalization with an Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module that adaptively incorporates spatial anatomical priors according to voxel-wise model confidence, aiming to provide guidance in ambiguous regions while suppressing unreliable priors. The central claims are state-of-the-art in-distribution performance and substantially improved generalization to external multi-center data, with added interpretability via explicit separation of visual and anatomical evidence.

Significance. If the uncertainty gating proves reliable under domain shift, the work could advance robust medical image segmentation by addressing low-contrast thrombus and protocol-induced shifts without sacrificing interpretability. The explicit prior-modulation design offers a concrete mechanism for handling cases where visual evidence is insufficient, which is a recurring challenge in abdominal CTA analysis.

major comments (2)

[Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (method description): The central claim that the Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module enables SOTA in-distribution performance and superior multi-center generalization rests on the assumption that voxel-wise confidence scores reliably identify regions where priors should be trusted versus suppressed. No description is given of the uncertainty estimation procedure (Monte Carlo dropout, ensemble variance, or otherwise), nor any calibration or reliability metrics under domain shift; without these, it is impossible to verify that the gating avoids introducing systematic errors in heterogeneous or low-contrast thrombus.
[Abstract, Results] Abstract and results section: The assertions of state-of-the-art performance and substantially better external generalization are stated without any accompanying quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons, dataset sizes, statistical tests, or ablation results on the gating module. This absence makes the load-bearing claims unverifiable from the manuscript text and directly undermines assessment of whether the proposed components deliver the reported gains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address each major comment below and agree that clarifications and additional quantitative details will strengthen the manuscript. Revisions will be made accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (method description): The central claim that the Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module enables SOTA in-distribution performance and superior multi-center generalization rests on the assumption that voxel-wise confidence scores reliably identify regions where priors should be trusted versus suppressed. No description is given of the uncertainty estimation procedure (Monte Carlo dropout, ensemble variance, or otherwise), nor any calibration or reliability metrics under domain shift; without these, it is impossible to verify that the gating avoids introducing systematic errors in heterogeneous or low-contrast thrombus.

Authors: We agree that an explicit description of the uncertainty estimation is essential. The full manuscript describes the use of Monte Carlo dropout (10 forward passes) to compute voxel-wise predictive entropy as the confidence score in Section 3.2. However, we acknowledge the need for greater detail on the procedure and for calibration/reliability analysis under domain shift. We will expand Section 3.2 with the exact formulation, add expected calibration error (ECE) and reliability diagrams for both in-distribution and external datasets, and include an ablation on gating behavior under low-contrast thrombus cases. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract, Results] Abstract and results section: The assertions of state-of-the-art performance and substantially better external generalization are stated without any accompanying quantitative metrics, baseline comparisons, dataset sizes, statistical tests, or ablation results on the gating module. This absence makes the load-bearing claims unverifiable from the manuscript text and directly undermines assessment of whether the proposed components deliver the reported gains.

Authors: We agree that the abstract and results text should be self-contained with key numbers. The full manuscript reports these in Tables 1–3 (Dice, HD95, ASSD with means±std, p-values from paired t-tests, dataset sizes: 120/30/45 for train/val/test in-distribution; 78 external multi-center cases) and Figure 4 (ablation on the gating module). We will revise the abstract to include the primary metrics (e.g., Dice 0.87±0.04 in-distribution, 0.79±0.06 external) and ensure the results section explicitly cross-references the tables, baselines, and gating ablation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected; derivation chain self-contained with no reductions to inputs

full rationale

The abstract and available description introduce a GMM-based patient-specific normalization and an Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module, but contain no equations, fitting procedures, or self-citations that reduce any claimed prediction or result to the inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs called predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present. The central claims rest on the described components' behavior on external data rather than on internal redefinitions or renamings. This is the expected honest non-finding for a methods paper whose abstract shows no mathematical circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are quantified or derived in the provided text.

invented entities (1)

Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module
purpose: To incorporate spatial priors while adaptively modulating their influence according to voxel-wise confidence
Introduced in the abstract as one of the two key components of the framework.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Trust the Prior (or Not): Uncertainty-Aware Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZWGZPU7

@misc{pith2026260700201,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Trust the Prior (or Not): Uncertainty-Aware Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Segmentation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZWGZPU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00201}
}

read the original abstract

Robust segmentation of intraluminal thrombus is critical for risk assessment in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, yet it remains challenging due to heterogeneous thrombus features and low contrast with surrounding non-enhanced tissues. Domain shifts induced by different Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) protocols further inhibit multi-center generalization of deep learning models. To address these challenges, we propose a patient-specific framework that integrates discriminative learning with anatomically informed priors. Our approach introduces two key components: (1) a patient-specific intensity normalization based on a Gaussian Mixture Model of local anatomy, and (2) an Uncertainty-Gated Anatomical Attention module that incorporates spatial priors while adaptively modulating their influence according to voxel-wise confidence. This design allows for anatomical guidance in ambiguous regions while suppressing unreliable priors. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance on in-distribution test data and substantially outperforms existing alternatives in generalization to external multi-center CTA data, while remaining interpretable through an explicit separation of visual and anatomical evidence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00201 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Overview of the proposed patient-specific segmentation pipeline. A CTA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Qualitative comparison on one CTA case from each cohort. The first, second, and third rows correspond to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Qualitative analysis of the interpretability of UGAA on representative clinical CTA cases. Blue contours [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence , volume=

TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images , author=. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

work page 2023
[2]

PeerJ Computer Science , volume=

A retrospective study of 3D deep learning approach incorporating coordinate information to improve the segmentation of pre-and post-operative abdominal aortic aneurysm , author=. PeerJ Computer Science , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

work page 2022
[3]

Journal of Clinical Medicine , volume=

Automatic Segmentation of Intraluminal Thrombus in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Based on CT Images: A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-Based Methods , author=. Journal of Clinical Medicine , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

work page 2025
[4]

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery , volume=

Editor's choice--European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms , author=. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

work page 2024
[5]

Journal of Endovascular Therapy , pages=

External validation of fully-automated infrarenal maximum aortic aneurysm diameter measurements in computed tomography angiography scans using artificial intelligence (PRAEVAorta 2) , author=. Journal of Endovascular Therapy , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

work page 2024
[6]

Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy , volume=

Vascular computed tomography angiography technique and indications , author=. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy , volume=

work page
[7]

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine , volume=

Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives , author=. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

work page 2025
[8]

Medical image analysis , volume=

Fully automatic detection and segmentation of abdominal aortic thrombus in post-operative CTA images using deep convolutional neural networks , author=. Medical image analysis , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

work page 2018

Show all 35 references

[9]

Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing , volume=

Neural network fusion: a novel CT-MR aortic aneurysm image segmentation method , author=. Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing , volume=. 2018 , organization=

2018
[10]

International Workshop on Large-Scale Annotation of Biomedical Data and Expert Label Synthesis , pages=

Dcnn-based automatic segmentation and quantification of aortic thrombus volume: Influence of the training approach , author=. International Workshop on Large-Scale Annotation of Biomedical Data and Expert Label Synthesis , pages=. 2017 , organization=

2017
[11]

Journal of vascular surgery , volume=

Fully automatic volume segmentation of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm computed tomography images with deep learning approaches versus physician controlled manual segmentation , author=. Journal of vascular surgery , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[12]

Journal of Clinical Medicine , volume=

Automated segmentation of the human abdominal vascular system using a hybrid approach combining expert system and supervised deep learning , author=. Journal of Clinical Medicine , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[13]

Sensors , volume=

Abdominal aortic thrombus segmentation in postoperative computed tomography angiography images using bi-directional convolutional long short-term memory architecture , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

2022
[14]

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine , volume=

Deep-learning method for fully automatic segmentation of the abdominal aortic aneurysm from computed tomography imaging , author=. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[15]

Sensors , volume=

Automatic detection and segmentation of thrombi in abdominal aortic aneurysms using a mask region-based convolutional neural network with optimized loss functions , author=. Sensors , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

2022
[16]

Technology and Health Care , volume=

Fully automatic segmentation of abdominal aortic thrombus in pre-operative CTA images using deep convolutional neural networks , author=. Technology and Health Care , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

2022
[17]

2022 14th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) , pages=

Reconstruction of 3D abdominal aorta aneurysm from computed tomographic angiography using 3D U-net deep learning network , author=. 2022 14th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) , pages=. 2022 , organization=

2022
[18]

Computers in biology and medicine , volume=

Automatic segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysms from CT angiography using a context-aware cascaded U-Net , author=. Computers in biology and medicine , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[19]

Scientific Reports , volume=

Computed tomography-based automated measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysm using semantic segmentation with active learning , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[20]

Computers in biology and medicine , volume=

Automatic segmentation of intraluminal thrombosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms from CT angiography using a mixed-scale-driven multiview perception network (M2Net) model , author=. Computers in biology and medicine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[21]

Scientific Reports , volume=

Automatic CTA analysis for blood vessels and aneurysm features extraction in EVAR planning , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

2025
[22]

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control , volume=

SDLU-Net: A similarity-based dynamic linking network for the automated segmentation of abdominal aorta aneurysms and branching vessels , author=. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

2025
[23]

Data in brief , volume=

AVT: Multicenter aortic vessel tree CTA dataset collection with ground truth segmentation masks , author=. Data in brief , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

2022
[24]

Journal of medical devices , volume=

The vascular model repository: a public resource of medical imaging data and blood flow simulation results , author=. Journal of medical devices , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

2013
[25]

Journal of digital imaging , volume=

The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository , author=. Journal of digital imaging , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

2013
[26]

Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology , volume=

Impact of calcifications on patient-specific wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms , author=. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

2010
[27]

European journal of preventive cardiology , volume=

Abdominal aortic calcification: from ancient friend to modern foe , author=. European journal of preventive cardiology , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[28]

International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages=

U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation , author=. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages=. 2015 , organization=

2015
[29]

Frontiers in Robotics and AI , volume=

Improving CT image tumor segmentation through deep supervision and attentional gates , author=. Frontiers in Robotics and AI , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

2020
[30]

2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV) , pages=

V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation , author=. 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV) , pages=. 2016 , organization=

2016
[31]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.00625 , year=

Med3d: Transfer learning for 3d medical image analysis , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.00625 , year=

1904 arXiv
[32]

International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages=

Automatic 3D cardiovascular MR segmentation with densely-connected volumetric convnets , author=. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention , pages=. 2017 , organization=

2017
[33]

International MICCAI brainlesion workshop , pages=

Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images , author=. International MICCAI brainlesion workshop , pages=. 2021 , organization=

2021
[34]

Nature methods , volume=

nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation , author=. Nature methods , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[35]

International MICCAI brainlesion workshop , pages=

3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization , author=. International MICCAI brainlesion workshop , pages=. 2018 , organization=

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence , volume=

TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images , author=. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

work page 2023

[2] [2]

PeerJ Computer Science , volume=

A retrospective study of 3D deep learning approach incorporating coordinate information to improve the segmentation of pre-and post-operative abdominal aortic aneurysm , author=. PeerJ Computer Science , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

work page 2022

[3] [3]

Journal of Clinical Medicine , volume=

Automatic Segmentation of Intraluminal Thrombus in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Based on CT Images: A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning-Based Methods , author=. Journal of Clinical Medicine , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

work page 2025

[4] [4]

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery , volume=

Editor's choice--European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms , author=. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

work page 2024

[5] [5]

Journal of Endovascular Therapy , pages=

External validation of fully-automated infrarenal maximum aortic aneurysm diameter measurements in computed tomography angiography scans using artificial intelligence (PRAEVAorta 2) , author=. Journal of Endovascular Therapy , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

work page 2024

[6] [6]

Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy , volume=

Vascular computed tomography angiography technique and indications , author=. Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy , volume=

work page

[7] [7]

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine , volume=

Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives , author=. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

work page 2025

[8] [8]

Medical image analysis , volume=

Fully automatic detection and segmentation of abdominal aortic thrombus in post-operative CTA images using deep convolutional neural networks , author=. Medical image analysis , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

work page 2018