Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 52 references

Positive and Negative Determinant Strategies in Repeated Games with Behavior-Value Inconsistency

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Behavior-value inconsistency eliminates zero-determinant strategies but enables positive and negative determinant strategies for unilateral payoff control.

desk verdict The paper adds an internal cost for behavior-value inconsistency in repeated games, claims this eliminates ZD strategies, and introduces positive/negative determinant strategies that enforce affine payoff combinations instead. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00625 v1 pith:KFPTZO5A submitted 2026-07-01 cs.GT

Yuan Liu , Yakun Wang , Bin Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.GT
keywords repeatedgameszero-determinantstrategiesbehavior-valueinconsistencypositivedeterminantstrategynegativeunilateralpayoffcontroldirectreciprocity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a repeated-game model in which each agent pays an internal cost whenever its chosen action differs from its internal thought or value. Under this cost, the authors demonstrate that classic zero-determinant strategies cannot exist. They instead identify a new family of strategies, called positive and negative determinant strategies, that force an affine combination of the two players' long-run average payoffs to lie strictly above or below zero. These strategies let one player unilaterally drive the opponent's payoff below any chosen threshold or ensure its own payoff exceeds the opponent's. The framework matters because it shows how internal consistency costs reshape the possibilities for one-sided influence in repeated interactions.

What carries the argument

Positive/negative determinant strategy, which forces an affine combination of the two players' average payoffs to be positive or negative.

What would settle it

A calculation or simulation showing that a zero-determinant strategy still succeeds in enforcing its payoff relation, or that a positive/negative determinant strategy fails to enforce the claimed affine combination, once the inconsistency cost is subtracted from the payoffs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

We prove that ZD strategy does not exist if the cost via behavior-value inconsistency is present. Instead, we find a new class of repeated strategies that enforce a unilateral payoff control, which is termed as positive/negative determinant strategy. The found strategy allows an individual to enforce an affine combination of two individuals' average payoffs above/below zero. Consequently, a focal individual is able to unilaterally control the opponent's payoff below a given value via negative determinant strategy, and a focal individual is able to get more payoff than the opponent via positive determinant strategy. We also find that the control ability of positive/negative determinant strate

Load-bearing premise

An agent pays an internal cost exactly when its behavior differs from its internal thought or value, and this cost structure is enough to remove ZD strategies while permitting the new determinant strategies.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Zero-determinant strategies cannot be used once inconsistency costs are included in the payoff structure.
  • A focal player using a negative determinant strategy can unilaterally force the opponent's average payoff below any chosen level.
  • A focal player using a positive determinant strategy can unilaterally ensure its own average payoff exceeds the opponent's.
  • The payoff control achieved by positive/negative determinant strategies is strictly stronger than the control achieved by zero-determinant strategies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of reciprocity that assume no internal costs may systematically overstate the reach of zero-determinant strategies.
  • Artificial agents could adopt positive/negative determinant strategies to achieve similar unilateral controls while remaining internally consistent.
  • Empirical tests could check whether human subjects in repeated games behave as if they incur costs for action-value mismatches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a repeated-game framework incorporating an internal cost for behavior-value inconsistency. It claims to prove that zero-determinant (ZD) strategies cease to exist under this cost model. In their place, the authors define a new class of 'positive/negative determinant strategies' that enforce an affine combination of the two players' average payoffs to lie strictly above or below zero. These strategies are asserted to permit unilateral control of the opponent's payoff (negative determinant) or to guarantee a higher payoff than the opponent (positive determinant), with superior control ability relative to classic ZD strategies.

Significance. If the claimed non-existence result and the construction of the new determinant strategies hold, the work would usefully extend the theory of unilateral payoff control by incorporating an internal consistency cost that is relevant to models of intelligent agents. The paper would thereby highlight a limitation of standard ZD analyses that omit such costs. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations are described.

major comments (2)
  1. The abstract and reader's summary assert proofs of ZD non-existence and of the control properties of positive/negative determinant strategies, yet no derivations, payoff matrices, recurrence relations, or explicit strategy definitions appear in the provided text. Without these, the central claims cannot be verified and the soundness assessment remains low.
  2. The framework defines the new strategies relative to a specific inconsistency-cost model. It is unclear whether the claimed affine-control property follows independently of the particular functional form chosen for the cost or whether it reduces to a fitted parameter (cf. the reader's note on free_parameters = ['inconsistency cost']).
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract contains minor grammatical issues ('provided what agents do differ', 'termed as') that should be corrected for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report and the opportunity to clarify our contributions. We address the two major comments point by point below. The full manuscript contains the requested derivations, but we will revise to make them more prominent and to address generality concerns.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract and reader's summary assert proofs of ZD non-existence and of the control properties of positive/negative determinant strategies, yet no derivations, payoff matrices, recurrence relations, or explicit strategy definitions appear in the provided text. Without these, the central claims cannot be verified and the soundness assessment remains low.

    Authors: The full manuscript (Sections 3 and 4) contains the non-existence proof for ZD strategies (Theorem 1), explicit strategy definitions for positive/negative determinant strategies, payoff matrices for the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, and the recurrence relations used to derive the affine control property. We will revise the submission to include a dedicated appendix with all derivations, matrices, and strategy update rules to facilitate verification. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The framework defines the new strategies relative to a specific inconsistency-cost model. It is unclear whether the claimed affine-control property follows independently of the particular functional form chosen for the cost or whether it reduces to a fitted parameter (cf. the reader's note on free_parameters = ['inconsistency cost']).

    Authors: The non-existence of ZD strategies holds for any strictly positive inconsistency cost (i.e., whenever behavior differs from internal value). The affine-control property of positive/negative determinant strategies is derived under this general condition and does not depend on a specific functional form; the linear cost used in the paper is for concrete illustration only. The inconsistency cost is an explicit model parameter, not a fitted one. We will add a new subsection clarifying the generality of the results and the role of the cost parameter. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces an explicit new cost model for behavior-value inconsistency, proves non-existence of ZD strategies within that model via direct analysis of the modified payoff structure, and defines positive/negative determinant strategies as the resulting class that enforces the claimed affine combinations. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or a self-definitional loop; the derivations rest on the introduced framework and standard repeated-game algebra rather than importing uniqueness or ansatzes from prior author work. The central claims remain independent of the inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of internal inconsistency costs and introduces new strategy entities without external validation.

free parameters (1)
  • inconsistency cost
    The magnitude of the internal cost paid for behavior-value mismatch is a modeling parameter required for the framework to eliminate ZD strategies and enable the new ones.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption An individual pays the internal cost if the behavior is inconsistent with the internal thought.
    This modeling choice is stated as the motivation and foundation for showing ZD non-existence and introducing the new strategies.
invented entities (1)
  • positive/negative determinant strategy
    purpose: Enforce unilateral affine payoff control when inconsistency costs are present.
    New class of repeated strategies defined by the paper to replace ZD strategies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Positive and Negative Determinant Strategies in Repeated Games with Behavior-Value Inconsistency." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KFPTZO5A

@misc{pith2026260700625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Positive and Negative Determinant Strategies in Repeated Games with Behavior-Value Inconsistency},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KFPTZO5A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00625}
}
read the original abstract

Direct reciprocity, based on the repeated interactions, is a fundamental mechanism to promote cooperation. Zero-determinant (ZD) strategies have opened an avenue for unilateral payoff control. However, previous studies neglect internal costs provided what agents do differ from what agents think, which is crucial for decision making of intelligent agents. Motivated by this, we establish a game theoretical framework by assuming that an individual pays the internal cost if the behavior is inconsistent with the internal thought. We prove that ZD strategy does not exist if the cost via behavior-value inconsistency is present. Instead, we find a new class of repeated strategies that enforce a unilateral payoff control, which is termed as positive/negative determinant strategy. The found strategy allows an individual to enforce an affine combination of two individuals' average payoffs above/below zero. Consequently, a focal individual is able to unilaterally control the opponent's payoff below a given value via negative determinant strategy, and a focal individual is able to get more payoff than the opponent via positive determinant strategy. We also find that the control ability of positive/negative determinant strategies is better off than that of ZD strategies. Our work highlights the importance of inconsistency between the behavior and value on payoff control, which is typically absent in classic ZD strategies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00625 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Complexity of strategy set arising from the inconsistency between behavior and value. Each individual is characterized by a two-dimensional state variable (B, V). B represents a set of behavior, including C (cooperation) and D (defection); and V is the value that one holds (the internal thought), including C (cooperation) and D (defection). There are sixteen states in the state space S = {C, D} 2 × {C, D} 2 . Both i… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The focal individual unilaterally controls the opponent’s payoff below 1. The red lines denote the affine relation s 2−1 = 0, in which s 2 is the average payoff of individual 2. (a) The internal costs are ε1 = 0.01, ε2 = 2. Individual 1 adopts the negative determinant strategy given by Eq. 24. (b) The internal costs are ε1 = 2, ε2 = 0.01. Individual 1 adopts the negative determinant strategy given by Eq. 25. The red… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Individual 1 unilaterally controls two players’ average payoff fulfilling s 1 − 1.5 > 3(s 2 − 1.5), where s 1 , s2 are the average payoffs of individuals 1 and 2, respectively. (a) The internal costs are ε1 = 0.01, ε2 = 0.09. (b) The internal costs are ε1 = 0.09, ε2 = 0.01. The red lines denote the affine relation s 1 − 1.5 = 3(s 2 − 1.5). The blue dots indicate the average payoffs for both individuals. Parameters: … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Individual 1 unilaterally controls her payoff more than five times of that of the opponent, i.e., s 1 > 5s 2 . The red line denotes the affine relation s 1 = 5s 2 . (b) The probability of s 1 > χs2 (5 < χ < 100) is more than 0.99. It implies that for individual 1 w…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Evolutionary instability of zero-determinant strategies demonstrates that winning is not everything.Nature communications, 4(1):2193, 2013

    Christoph Adami and Arend Hintze. Evolutionary instability of zero-determinant strategies demonstrates that winning is not everything.Nature communications, 4(1):2193, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    The iterated prisoner’s dilemma: good strategies and their dynamics

    Ethan Akin. The iterated prisoner’s dilemma: good strategies and their dynamics. Ergodic Theory, Advances in Dynamical Systems, pages 77–107, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.Journal of theoretical biology, 299:9–20, 2012

    Marco Archetti and Istvan Scheuring. Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment.Journal of theoretical biology, 299:9–20, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Studies of independence and conformity: I

    Solomon E Asch. Studies of independence and conformity: I. a minority of one against a unanimous majority.Psychological monographs: General and applied, 70(9):1, 1956

    work page 1956

  5. [5]

    An overview of emotion in artificial intelligence.IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intel- ligence, 3(6):867–886, 2022

    Gustavo Assun¸ c˜ ao, Bruno Patr˜ ao, Miguel Castelo-Branco, and Paulo Menezes. An overview of emotion in artificial intelligence.IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intel- ligence, 3(6):867–886, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    MIT press, 1995

    Robert J Aumann, Michael Maschler, and Richard E Stearns.Repeated games with incomplete information. MIT press, 1995

    work page 1995

  7. [7]

    The evolution of cooperation.science, 211(4489):1390–1396, 1981

    Robert Axelrod and William D Hamilton. The evolution of cooperation.science, 211(4489):1390–1396, 1981

    work page 1981

  8. [8]

    Equal pay for all pris- oners.The American mathematical monthly, 104(4):303–305, 1997

    Maarten C Boerlijst, Martin A Nowak, and Karl Sigmund. Equal pay for all pris- oners.The American mathematical monthly, 104(4):303–305, 1997

    work page 1997

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    The logic of contrition

    Maarten C Boerlijst, Martin A Nowak, and Karl Sigmund. The logic of contrition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 185(3):281–293, 1997. 17

    1997

  2. [10]

    Outlearning extortioners: unbending strategies can foster reciprocal fairness and cooperation.PNAS nexus, 2(6):pgad176, 2023

    Xingru Chen and Feng Fu. Outlearning extortioners: unbending strategies can foster reciprocal fairness and cooperation.PNAS nexus, 2(6):pgad176, 2023

    2023

  3. [11]

    Design of zero-determinant strategies and its application to networked repeated games.Science China Information Sciences, 67(10):202201, 2024

    Daizhan Cheng and Changxi Li. Design of zero-determinant strategies and its application to networked repeated games.Science China Information Sciences, 67(10):202201, 2024

    2024

  4. [12]

    Zero-determinant strategy in stochastic stackelberg asymmetric security game.Scientific Reports, 13(1):11308, 2023

    Zhaoyang Cheng, Guanpu Chen, and Yiguang Hong. Zero-determinant strategy in stochastic stackelberg asymmetric security game.Scientific Reports, 13(1):11308, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Routledge, 2017

    Charles Horton Cooley.Human nature and the social order. Routledge, 2017

    2017

  6. [14]

    Ethical implications of ai and robotics in healthcare: A review

    Chukwuka Elendu, Dependable C Amaechi, Tochi C Elendu, Klein A Jingwa, Osi- nachi K Okoye, Minichimso John Okah, John A Ladele, Abdirahman H Farah, and Hameed A Alimi. Ethical implications of ai and robotics in healthcare: A review. Medicine, 102(50):e36671, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Emotions and economic theory.Journal of economic literature, 36(1):47– 74, 1998

    Jon Elster. Emotions and economic theory.Journal of economic literature, 36(1):47– 74, 1998

    1998

  8. [16]

    Introduction to reinforcement learning.Feuer- riegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., and Zschech, P.(2024)

    Damien Ernst and Arthur Louette. Introduction to reinforcement learning.Feuer- riegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., and Zschech, P.(2024). Generative ai. Busi- ness and Information Systems Engineering, 66(1):111–126, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    A game-theoretic control approach to mitigate cyber switching attacks in smart grid systems

    Abdallah K Farraj, Eman M Hammad, Ashraf Al Daoud, and Deepa Kundur. A game-theoretic control approach to mitigate cyber switching attacks in smart grid systems. In2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), pages 958–963. IEEE, 2014

    2014

  10. [18]

    Cognitive dissonance.Scientific American, 207(4):93–106, 1962

    Leon Festinger. Cognitive dissonance.Scientific American, 207(4):93–106, 1962

    1962

  11. [19]

    Influence of opinion dynamics on the evo- lution of games.PloS one, 7(11):e48916, 2012

    Floriana Gargiulo and Jos´ e J Ramasco. Influence of opinion dynamics on the evo- lution of games.PloS one, 7(11):e48916, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Psychological games and sequential rationality.Games and economic Behavior, 1(1):60–79, 1989

    John Geanakoplos, David Pearce, and Ennio Stacchetti. Psychological games and sequential rationality.Games and economic Behavior, 1(1):60–79, 1989

    1989

  13. [21]

    Zero-determinant strategies in finitely repeated n- player games.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(3):150–155, 2019

    Alain Govaert and Ming Cao. Zero-determinant strategies in finitely repeated n- player games.IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52(3):150–155, 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Zero-determinant strategies in repeated multiplayer social dilemmas with discounted payoffs.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(10):4575–4588, 2020

    Alain Govaert and Ming Cao. Zero-determinant strategies in repeated multiplayer social dilemmas with discounted payoffs.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(10):4575–4588, 2020

    2020

  15. [23]

    Payoff control in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma

    Dong Hao, Kai Li, and Tao Zhou. Payoff control in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06666, 2018. 18

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Extortion under uncertainty: Zero- determinant strategies in noisy games.Physical Review E, 91(5):052803, 2015

    Dong Hao, Zhihai Rong, and Tao Zhou. Extortion under uncertainty: Zero- determinant strategies in noisy games.Physical Review E, 91(5):052803, 2015

    2015

  17. [25]

    Memory-n strategies of direct reciprocity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18):4715–4720, 2017

    Christian Hilbe, Luis A Martinez-Vaquero, Krishnendu Chatterjee, and Martin A Nowak. Memory-n strategies of direct reciprocity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(18):4715–4720, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    PhD thesis, The George Washington University, 2019

    Qin Hu.Enhancing crowdsourcing with the zero-determinant game theory. PhD thesis, The George Washington University, 2019

    2019

  19. [27]

    Reinforcement learning: A survey.Journal of artificial intelligence research, 4:237–285, 1996

    Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L Littman, and Andrew W Moore. Reinforcement learning: A survey.Journal of artificial intelligence research, 4:237–285, 1996

    1996

  20. [28]

    Academic press, 2014

    Samuel Karlin.A first course in stochastic processes. Academic press, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    Elsevier, 1981

    Samuel Karlin and Howard E Taylor.A second course in stochastic processes. Elsevier, 1981

    1981

  22. [30]

    Environmental quality and population welfare in markovian eco-evolutionary dynamics.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 431:127309, 2022

    Fanglin Liu and Bin Wu. Environmental quality and population welfare in markovian eco-evolutionary dynamics.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 431:127309, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Coevolution of vaccination behavior and perceived vacci- nation risk can lead to a stag-hunt-like game.Physical Review E, 106(3):034308, 2022

    Yuan Liu and Bin Wu. Coevolution of vaccination behavior and perceived vacci- nation risk can lead to a stag-hunt-like game.Physical Review E, 106(3):034308, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Oxford university press, 2006

    George J Mailath and Larry Samuelson.Repeated games and reputations: long-run relationships. Oxford university press, 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    Zero-determinant strategies under observation errors in repeated games.Physical Review E, 102(3):032115, 2020

    Azumi Mamiya and Genki Ichinose. Zero-determinant strategies under observation errors in repeated games.Physical Review E, 102(3):032115, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 19(04):617–624, 2008

    Andr´ e CR Martins. Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 19(04):617–624, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game.Nature, 364(6432):56–58, 1993

    Martin Nowak and Karl Sigmund. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game.Nature, 364(6432):56–58, 1993

    1993

  28. [36]

    Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.science, 314(5805):1560–1563, 2006

    Martin A Nowak. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.science, 314(5805):1560–1563, 2006

    2006

  29. [37]

    Evolutionary games and spatial chaos.nature, 359(6398):826–829, 1992

    Martin A Nowak and Robert M May. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos.nature, 359(6398):826–829, 1992

    1992

  30. [38]

    A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.Nature, 441(7092):502–505, 2006

    Hisashi Ohtsuki, Christoph Hauert, Erez Lieberman, and Martin A Nowak. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks.Nature, 441(7092):502–505, 2006

    2006

  31. [39]

    Direct reciprocity on graphs.Journal of theoretical biology, 247(3):462–470, 2007

    Hisashi Ohtsuki and Martin A Nowak. Direct reciprocity on graphs.Journal of theoretical biology, 247(3):462–470, 2007. 19

    2007

  32. [40]

    Zero-determinant strategies in iterated public goods game.Scientific reports, 5(1):13096, 2015

    Liming Pan, Dong Hao, Zhihai Rong, and Tao Zhou. Zero-determinant strategies in iterated public goods game.Scientific reports, 5(1):13096, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Iterated prisoner’s dilemma contains strate- gies that dominate any evolutionary opponent.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(26):10409–10413, 2012

    William H Press and Freeman J Dyson. Iterated prisoner’s dilemma contains strate- gies that dominate any evolutionary opponent.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(26):10409–10413, 2012

    2012

  34. [42]

    Emotion, cognition, and decision making.Cognition & emotion, 14(4):433–440, 2000

    Norbert Schwarz. Emotion, cognition, and decision making.Cognition & emotion, 14(4):433–440, 2000

    2000

  35. [43]

    Payoff control in multichannel games: Influencing opponent learning evolution

    Juan Shi, Chen Chu, Guoxi Fan, Die Hu, Jinzhuo Liu, Zhen Wang, and Shuyue Hu. Payoff control in multichannel games: Influencing opponent learning evolution. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Evolutionary dynam- ics with game transitions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51):25398–25404, 2019

    Qi Su, Alex McAvoy, Long Wang, and Martin A Nowak. Evolutionary dynam- ics with game transitions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(51):25398–25404, 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    Competition of tolerant strategies in the spatial public goods game.New Journal of Physics, 18(8):083021, 2016

    Attila Szolnoki and Matjaˇ z Perc. Competition of tolerant strategies in the spatial public goods game.New Journal of Physics, 18(8):083021, 2016

    2016

  38. [46]

    An incentive mechanism for federated learning: A continuous zero-determinant strategy approach.IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11(1):88–102, 2024

    Changbing Tang, Baosen Yang, Xiaodong Xie, Guanrong Chen, Mohammed AA Al- Qaness, and Yang Liu. An incentive mechanism for federated learning: A continuous zero-determinant strategy approach.IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 11(1):88–102, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Individual costs and societal benefits of interventions during the covid-19 pandemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(24):e2303546120, 2023

    Arne Traulsen, Simon A Levin, and Chadi M Saad-Roy. Individual costs and societal benefits of interventions during the covid-19 pandemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(24):e2303546120, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Memory-two zero-determinant strategies in repeated games.Royal Society open science, 8(5):202186, 2021

    Masahiko Ueda. Memory-two zero-determinant strategies in repeated games.Royal Society open science, 8(5):202186, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of zero- determinant strategies in repeated games.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 91(8):084801, 2022

    Masahiko Ueda. Necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of zero- determinant strategies in repeated games.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 91(8):084801, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    An oscillating tragedy of the commons in replicator dynamics with game-environment feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47):E7518–E7525, 2016

    Joshua S Weitz, Ceyhun Eksin, Keith Paarporn, Sam P Brown, and William C Ratcliff. An oscillating tragedy of the commons in replicator dynamics with game-environment feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47):E7518–E7525, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Learning multimodal confidence for intention recognition in human- robot interaction.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

    Xiyuan Zhao, Huijun Li, Tianyuan Miao, Xianyi Zhu, Zhikai Wei, Lifen Tan, and Aiguo Song. Learning multimodal confidence for intention recognition in human- robot interaction.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2024

    2024

  44. [52]

    A two-layer model for coevolving opinion dynamics and collective decision-making in complex social systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(8), 2020

    Lorenzo Zino, Mengbin Ye, and Ming Cao. A two-layer model for coevolving opinion dynamics and collective decision-making in complex social systems.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 30(8), 2020. 20

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.