Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 87 references

Atomic Cluster Expansion Potentials for Screw Dislocations in BCC Refractory Metals

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-07-02 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Extending an existing DFT database produces atomic cluster expansion potentials that reach near-DFT accuracy for screw dislocation properties in BCC refractory metals.

desk verdict New ACE potentials get closer to DFT on screw dislocations in refractory BCC metals, with honest caveats on database dependence. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.00717 v1 pith:3ILWH4VO submitted 2026-07-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Lei Zhang , Francesco Maresca This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords atomicclusterexpansionscrewdislocationsBCCrefractorymetalsPeierlsbarrierinteratomicpotentialsDFTdatabasekink-pairactivationplasticity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs a family of atomic cluster expansion potentials for the group-5 and group-6 refractory metals by adding targeted configurations to an existing density-functional-theory database. These potentials are shown to reproduce the compact three-fold cores, Peierls barriers, and glide planes of screw dislocations far more faithfully than earlier classical or machine-learned models. Near-DFT fidelity is obtained for molybdenum and tungsten; substantial gains appear for vanadium, niobium and tantalum. The authors demonstrate that reproducing a single-humped Peierls barrier is not enough to guarantee correct glide behavior, and that transferability is controlled by database composition together with element-specific energetics. For niobium, molybdenum and tungsten the models further allow direct computation of kink-pair activation enthalpies.

What carries the argument

Atomic cluster expansion (ACE) potentials fitted to an extended DFT database, which encode the many-body interactions that set the three-fold symmetric core structure and the height and shape of the Peierls barrier.

What would settle it

An independent DFT calculation, performed on a screw-dislocation configuration never included in the fitting database, that yields a Peierls barrier height or preferred glide plane differing from the ACE prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The developed ACE potentials significantly improve the description of screw dislocation properties, achieving near-DFT accuracy for Mo and W and substantial improvement for V, Nb, and Ta. The results show that transferability to screw dislocation behavior depends sensitively on both database composition and element-specific energetics, and that achieving a single-humped Peierls barrier alone is not a sufficient validation metric for accurate prediction of dislocation glide. For Nb, Mo, and W, the developed ACE models also enable reliable calculation of kink-pair activation enthalpies, which are well described by both Kocks' law and a line-tension model.

Load-bearing premise

Extending an existing DFT database with additional configurations is sufficient to produce transferable potentials whose dislocation behavior is controlled by the database composition and element-specific energetics rather than by fitting artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Accurate, temperature-dependent flow-stress predictions become feasible for these refractory metals once kink-pair enthalpies are reliably obtained.
  • Database composition must be tuned specifically for dislocation properties; generic fitting does not guarantee transferability.
  • Reproducing a single-humped Peierls barrier is insufficient validation; the full glide-plane energetics must also be checked against DFT.
  • Element-specific differences in core energetics remain decisive even after the ACE functional form is adopted.
  • The same database-extension route can be applied to other BCC metals or to related defects whose core structures dominate plasticity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same fitting strategy could be tested on larger supercells that include dislocation–dislocation interactions or grain boundaries to check whether the improvement persists at engineering length scales.
  • Direct comparison of the predicted temperature dependence of yield stress against single-crystal experiments on Nb, Mo or W would provide an external test of the kink-pair enthalpies.
  • If the element-specific energetics requirement holds, the method may need re-optimization for alloys rather than pure metals.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to have developed an array of atomic cluster expansion (ACE) potentials for screw dislocations in BCC refractory metals (V, Nb, Ta, Mo, W) by extending an existing DFT database. These potentials significantly improve the description of screw dislocation properties, achieving near-DFT accuracy for Mo and W and substantial improvement for V, Nb, and Ta. The results indicate that transferability depends sensitively on database composition and element-specific energetics, and that a single-humped Peierls barrier is not sufficient validation for accurate dislocation glide prediction. For Nb, Mo, and W, the potentials enable reliable calculation of kink-pair activation enthalpies described by Kocks' law and a line-tension model.

Significance. If the results hold, this work provides valuable interatomic potentials for modeling the complex plasticity behavior in refractory metals, which are important for high-temperature structural applications. The emphasis on the role of database composition in achieving transferability offers practical insights for developing machine learning potentials. The calculation of kink-pair activation enthalpies represents a step toward bridging atomistic simulations with macroscopic mechanical properties. The caveat about validation metrics is a strength in the presentation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2: the claim of near-DFT accuracy for Mo and W (and substantial improvement for V, Nb, Ta) is presented without quantitative error bars on the Peierls barrier or glide-plane predictions, nor an explicit validation protocol. This is load-bearing for assessing the magnitude and robustness of the central improvements.
  2. [§5.1] §5.1: it is not stated whether the reported glide-plane predictions were obtained before or after inspecting the target DFT data. This directly affects the independence of the transferability claims from fitting artifacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3: axis labels and legends could be clarified to distinguish the different ACE models more clearly.
  2. [Tables 1-3] Ensure all element-specific results are cross-referenced consistently between text, tables, and supplementary material.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2: the claim of near-DFT accuracy for Mo and W (and substantial improvement for V, Nb, Ta) is presented without quantitative error bars on the Peierls barrier or glide-plane predictions, nor an explicit validation protocol. This is load-bearing for assessing the magnitude and robustness of the central improvements.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative error bars and an explicit validation protocol are needed to support the accuracy claims. In the revised manuscript we will report error bars on all Peierls barrier and glide-plane values (derived from DFT convergence tests and fitting residuals) and add a dedicated paragraph in §4.2 describing the validation protocol, including the exact comparison metrics and cross-validation steps used. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1: it is not stated whether the reported glide-plane predictions were obtained before or after inspecting the target DFT data. This directly affects the independence of the transferability claims from fitting artifacts.

    Authors: The glide-plane predictions were performed after fitting but without prior inspection of the specific target DFT glide-plane configurations used for validation. The fitting database contained only bulk, vacancy, and surface data; no glide-plane information was included, so the reported results constitute an independent transferability test. We will add an explicit statement of this sequence to §5.1 in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation consists of extending an existing DFT database and fitting ACE potentials, followed by direct comparison of predicted dislocation properties (Peierls barriers, glide planes, kink-pair enthalpies) to independent DFT reference calculations. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the fitted inputs; the paper explicitly notes that transferability depends on database composition and that single-humped barriers are insufficient validation. All central claims rest on external falsifiable benchmarks rather than self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or self-citation chains. This is the normal case of an empirical ML-potential paper whose results are not forced by its own equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; typical ACE models contain many basis-function coefficients fitted to the DFT database, but no explicit count or values are given. The central claim rests on the assumption that the extended database captures the relevant dislocation energetics.

free parameters (1)
  • ACE basis coefficients and hyperparameters
    Standard for atomic cluster expansion; many parameters are fitted to the extended DFT database to reproduce energies, forces, and dislocation properties.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption DFT calculations supply sufficiently accurate reference data for Peierls barriers and glide planes.
    Invoked when the authors extend the existing DFT database and treat its values as ground truth for fitting and validation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Atomic Cluster Expansion Potentials for Screw Dislocations in BCC Refractory Metals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3ILWH4VO

@misc{pith2026260700717,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Atomic Cluster Expansion Potentials for Screw Dislocations in BCC Refractory Metals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3ILWH4VO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.00717}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate atomistic modeling of screw dislocations in body-centered cubic (bcc) metals remains challenging because their plasticity is governed by a complex dislocation glide behavior due to their compact three-fold symmetric core structure and a strongly temperature-dependent flow stress induced by the large Peierls barrier. In the context of group 6 (V, Nb, Ta) and group 5 (Mo, W) refractory metals (RMs), both classical interatomic potentials and some machine learning potentials consistently fail to reproduce density functional theory (DFT) Peierls barriers and the glide plane. Here, we developed an array of atomic cluster expansion (ACE) potentials for these RMs by extending an existing DFT database. The developed ACE potentials significantly improve the description of screw dislocation properties, achieving near-DFT accuracy for Mo and W and substantial improvement for V, Nb, and Ta. The results show that transferability to screw dislocation behavior depends sensitively on both database composition and element-specific energetics, and that achieving a single-humped Peierls barrier alone is not a sufficient validation metric for accurate prediction of dislocation glide. For Nb, Mo, and W, the developed ACE models also enable reliable calculation of kink-pair activation enthalpies, which are well described by both Kocks' law and a line-tension model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00717 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Peierls barriers of screw dislocations in V, Nb, Mo, Ta, and W. GAP-2020 predictions were obtained using the original GAP models [25]. DFT-PWSCF data were taken from Ref. [15]. ACE-2025-Shuang data were taken from Ref. [36]. ACE-2025-Wang data were taken from Ref. [34]. NEP-2026 data were taken from Ref. [35]. significantly improve both accuracy and efficiency [22, 38]. In this work, we extend the existing DFT datab… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the energy and force RMSEs of the ACE-2020 and ACE-2025 potentials for V, Nb, Ta, Mo, and W. The upper panels show the training and test energy RMSEs, while the lower panels show the corresponding force RMSEs. Solid bars denote the RMSEs evaluated on the full dataset, and open circles indicate the RMSEs of datasets inside 1 eV/atom energy convex hull. orientations along the x, y, and z directions are s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic representations of the screw-dislocation configurations. (a) Screw-dislocation dipole configuration. The dislocation core positions are indicated by ⊕ and ⊖ symbols inside the triangles, and circles represent atomic positions. Colors denote the atomic positions in the pristine bcc crystal for one periodic unit cell of length b along the dislocation-line direction γ: orange atoms are used as the reference p… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Assessment of the ACE-2025 model accuracy across fundamental properties of bcc refractory metals. The relative error (%) for each property, including lattice parameter (a0), elastic constants (Ci j), surface energies for the {100}, {110}, {111}, and {112} crystallograp…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Generalized stacking fault energy (GSFE) curves for five bcc RMs predicted by ACE-2025 and DFT [63]. (a) ⟨111⟩{110} and (b)⟨111⟩{112} slip system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) ⟨111⟩-zone differential displacement maps at the dislocation core for five elements. Atomic positions are represented by the circles. Atoms are colored by their height along out-of-the-plane (dislocation line direction y) ⟨111⟩ in the undeformed perfect state for o…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Screw dislocation Peierls potential at T = 0 K and zero applied stress in bcc V, Nb, Ta, Mo, and W. Results obtained with the ACE-2020 and ACE-2025 interatomic potentials are compared to our VASP calculations. reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Energy variation between the hard and split cores of screw dislocation for five RMs. The energies are normalized by the minimum energy along the path. The dot and star symbols correspond to the saddle point along pathway predicted by DFT [15] and ACE-2025, respectively…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) Screw dislocation core trajectories in Nb, Mo, and W obtained from MD simulations at τapp = 0.7,1.2,2.05 GPa and T = 200 K. Green dots/lines represent sequential dislocation positions that change with simulation time. Dislocation positions are analysed using the DX…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Activation enthalpy barriers for W (green), Mo (orange), and Nb (blue) as a function of applied stress. Symbols represent NEB data, solid lines show predictions from the line-tension (LT) model of Dorn and Rajnak [77], and dashed lines correspond to fits based on Kock…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of Peierls barriers for V, Nb, Ta, Mo, and W predicted by ACE-2025 and selected interatomic potentials. The black dashed line denotes the DFT prediction from present calculations, and the shaded region indicates the corresponding ±10% deviation. Literature …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 87 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Embury, J

    Ashby, M. & Embury, J. The influence of dislocation density on the ductile-brittle transition in BCC metals. Scripta metallurgica19,557–562 (1985)

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    The ductile—brittle transition in body-centred cubic transition metals.Philosophical Magazine7, 177–196 (1962)

    Johnson, A. The ductile—brittle transition in body-centred cubic transition metals.Philosophical Magazine7, 177–196 (1962)

    work page 1962

  3. [3]

    & ZHANG, Y

    HAN, W., LU, Y . & ZHANG, Y . Mechanism of ductile-to-brittle transition in body-centered-cubic metals: A brief review.Acta Metall Sin59,335–348 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Argon, A.Strengthening mechanisms in crystal plasticity(OUP Oxford, 2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Caillard, D., Martin, J.,et al.Thermally activated mechanisms in crystal plasticity.MRS Bulletin30,318–320 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Some surprising features of the plastic deformation of body-centered cubic metals and alloys.Met- allurgical transactions A14,1237–1256 (1983)

    Christian, J. Some surprising features of the plastic deformation of body-centered cubic metals and alloys.Met- allurgical transactions A14,1237–1256 (1983)

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    & Richardson, G

    Duesbery, M. & Richardson, G. The dislocation core in crystalline materials.Critical Reviews in Solid State and Material Sciences17,1–46 (1991). 24

    work page 1991

  8. [8]

    & Bowen, D

    Vitek, V ., Perrin, R. & Bowen, D. The core structure of 1/2 (111) screw dislocations in bcc crystals.Philosophical Magazine21,1049–1073 (1970)

    work page 1970

Show all 87 references
  1. [9]

    & Vitek, V

    Ito, K. & Vitek, V . Atomistic study of non-Schmid effects in the plastic yielding of bcc metals.Philosophical Magazine A81,1387–1407 (2001)

    2001

  2. [10]

    & Ngan, A

    Wen, M. & Ngan, A. Atomistic simulation of kink-pairs of screw dislocations in body-centred cubic iron.Acta materialia48,4255–4265 (2000)

    2000

  3. [11]

    & Curtin, W

    Maresca, F., Dragoni, D., Cs ´anyi, G., Marzari, N. & Curtin, W. A. Screw dislocation structure and mobility in body centered cubic Fe predicted by a Gaussian Approximation Potential.npj Computational Materials4,69 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    & Willaime, F

    Dezerald, L., Rodney, D., Clouet, E., Ventelon, L. & Willaime, F. Plastic anisotropy and dislocation trajectory in BCC metals.Nature communications7,11695 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    Dislocation mobility function as a key to understanding plasticity of refractory metals and alloys

    Starikov, S. Dislocation mobility function as a key to understanding plasticity of refractory metals and alloys. Computational Materials Science246,113411 (2025)

    2025

  6. [14]

    & Rodney, D

    Ventelon, L., Willaime, F., Clouet, E. & Rodney, D. Ab initio investigation of the Peierls potential of screw dislocations in bcc Fe and W.Acta Materialia61,3973–3985 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    Dezerald, L.et al.Ab initio modeling of the two-dimensional energy landscape of screw dislocations in bcc transition metals.Physical Review B89,024104 (2014)

    2014

  8. [16]

    R., Tucker, G

    Weinberger, C. R., Tucker, G. J. & Foiles, S. M. Peierls potential of screw dislocations in bcc transition metals: Predictions from density functional theory.Physical Review B87,054114 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Gordon, P., Neeraj, T., Li, Y . & Li, J. Screw dislocation mobility in BCC metals: the role of the compact core on double-kink nucleation.Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering18,085008 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Cereceda, D.et al.Assessment of interatomic potentials for atomistic analysis of static and dynamic properties of screw dislocations in W.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25,085702 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    & Olsson, P

    Starikov, S., Grigorev, P. & Olsson, P. A. Angular-dependent interatomic potential for large-scale atomistic sim- ulation of W-Mo-Nb ternary alloys.Computational Materials Science233,112734 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    M.et al.Efficient and transferable machine learning potentials for the simulation of crystal defects in bcc Fe and W.Physical Review Materials5,103803 (2021)

    Goryaeva, A. M.et al.Efficient and transferable machine learning potentials for the simulation of crystal defects in bcc Fe and W.Physical Review Materials5,103803 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Wang, R.et al.Classical and machine learning interatomic potentials for BCC vanadium.Physical Review Mate- rials6,113603 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    & Maresca, F

    Zhang, L., Cs ´anyi, G., van der Giessen, E. & Maresca, F. Efficiency, accuracy, and transferability of machine learning potentials: Application to dislocations and cracks in iron.Acta Materialia270,119788 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Yin, S.et al.Atomistic simulations of dislocation mobility in refractory high-entropy alloys and the effect of chemical short-range order.Nature communications12,4873 (2021). 25

    2021

  16. [24]

    & Ong, S

    Li, X.-G., Chen, C., Zheng, H., Zuo, Y . & Ong, S. P. Complex strengthening mechanisms in the NbMoTaW multi-principal element alloy.npj Computational Materials6,70 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    & Djurabekova, F

    Byggm ¨astar, J., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Gaussian approximation potentials for body-centered-cubic transition metals.Physical Review Materials4,093802 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    & Djurabekova, F

    Nikoulis, G., Byggm ¨astar, J., Kioseoglou, J., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Machine-learning interatomic potential for W–Mo alloys.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33,315403 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    & Oda, T

    Kwon, H., Shiga, M., Kimizuka, H. & Oda, T. Accurate description of hydrogen diffusivity in bcc metals using machine-learning moment tensor potentials and path-integral methods.Acta Materialia247,118739 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    & Mori, H

    Ito, K., Yokoi, T., Hyodo, K. & Mori, H. Machine learning interatomic potential with DFT accuracy for general grain boundaries inα-Fe.npj Computational Materials10,255 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Journal of Applied Physics136(2024)

    Pan, J.et al.Atomic cluster expansion interatomic potential for defects and thermodynamics of Cu–W system. Journal of Applied Physics136(2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Shuang, F.et al.Modeling extensive defects in metals through classical potential-guided sampling and automated configuration reconstruction.npj Computational Materials11,118 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    & Ngan, A

    Lyu, S., Li, W., Xia, Y ., Chen, Y . & Ngan, A. H. Effects of chemical randomness on strength contributors and dislocation behaviors in a bcc multiprincipal element alloy.Physical Review Materials7,073602 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    npj Computational Materials(2026)

    Jiang, M.et al.Scaling reliable interatomic potentials to complex nuclear alloys via pretrained atomic models. npj Computational Materials(2026)

    2026

  25. [33]

    Luo, Y .et al.Dislocation-induced ordering as a source of strengthening in refractory multi-principal element alloys.npj Computational Materials(2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    Wang, W.et al.Ductility mechanisms in complex concentrated refractory alloys from atomistic fracture simula- tions.npj Computational Materials11,330 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    & Ala-Nissila, T

    Byggm ¨astar, J., Lopes, T., Fan, Z. & Ala-Nissila, T. Nine-element machine-learned interatomic potentials for multiphase refractory alloys.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04147(2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    & Dey, P

    Shuang, F., Wei, Z., Liu, K., Gao, W. & Dey, P. Universal machine learning interatomic potentials poised to sup- plant DFT in modeling general defects in metals and random alloys.Machine Learning: Science and Technology 6,030501 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    J., Bart ´ok, A

    Szlachta, W. J., Bart ´ok, A. P. & Cs ´anyi, G. Accuracy and transferability of Gaussian approximation potential models for tungsten.Physical Review B90,104108 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    Lysogorskiy, Y .et al.Performant implementation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon.npj Computational Materials7,97 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials.Physical Review B99, 014104 (2019)

    Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials.Physical Review B99, 014104 (2019). 26

    2019

  32. [40]

    & Drautz, R

    Lysogorskiy, Y ., Bochkarev, A., Mrovec, M. & Drautz, R. Active learning strategies for atomic cluster expansion models.Physical Review Materials7,043801 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    & Hafner, J

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals.Physical Review B47,558 (1993)

    1993

  34. [42]

    & Hafner, J

    Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium.Physical Review B49,14251 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    & Furthm ¨uller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthm ¨uller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.Physical Review B54,11169 (1996)

    1996

  36. [44]

    & Furthm ¨uller, J

    Kresse, G. & Furthm ¨uller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set.Computational Materials Science6,15–50 (1996)

    1996

  37. [45]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Physical review letters77,3865 (1996)

    1996

  38. [46]

    & Maresca, F

    Zhang, L., Cs ´anyi, G., Van Der Giessen, E. & Maresca, F. Atomistic fracture in bcc iron revealed by active learning of Gaussian approximation potential.npj Computational Materials9,217 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Wang, R., Zhu, L., Pattamatta, S., Srolovitz, D. J. & Wu, Z. The taming of the screw: Dislocation cores in BCC metals and alloys.Materials Today79,36–48 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    H.et al.Controlling screw dislocation core structure and Peierls barrier in BCC interatomic potentials

    Aitken, Z. H.et al.Controlling screw dislocation core structure and Peierls barrier in BCC interatomic potentials. International Journal of Solids and Structures303,113004 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & J ´onsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths.The Journal of chemical physics113,9901–9904 (2000)

    2000

  42. [50]

    C., Rohrer, J., Albe, K

    Erhard, L. C., Rohrer, J., Albe, K. & Deringer, V . L. Modelling atomic and nanoscale structure in the silicon– oxygen system through active machine learning.Nature Communications15,1927 (2024)

    1927

  43. [51]

    Bochkarev, A.et al.Efficient parametrization of the atomic cluster expansion.Physical Review Materials6, 013804 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    F., Zhou, Y

    Thomas du Toit, D. F., Zhou, Y . & Deringer, V . L. Hyperparameter optimization for atomic cluster expansion potentials.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation20,10103–10113 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Podryabinkin, E. V . & Shapeev, A. V . Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials.Computa- tional Materials Science140,171–180 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool

    Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering18,015012 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    Li, J.et al.Core energy and Peierls stress of a screw dislocation in bcc molybdenum: A periodic-cell tight-binding study.Physical Review B70,104113 (2004)

    2004

  48. [56]

    Dislocations and cracks in anisotropic elasticity.Philosophical Magazine3,625–646 (1958)

    Stroh, A. Dislocations and cracks in anisotropic elasticity.Philosophical Magazine3,625–646 (1958). 27

    1958

  49. [57]

    V ., Chang, J., Li, J

    Cai, W., Bulatob, V . V ., Chang, J., Li, J. & Yip, S. Periodic image effects in dislocation modelling.Philosophical Magazine83,539–567 (2003). 58.https://www.ctcms.nist.gov/potentials/atomman/

    2003

  50. [58]

    H.et al.The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29,273002 (2017)

    Larsen, A. H.et al.The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29,273002 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Grigorev, P.et al.matscipy: materials science at the atomic scale with Python.The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS)9(2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    P.et al.LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales.Computer Physics Communications271,108171 (2022)

    Thompson, A. P.et al.LAMMPS-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales.Computer Physics Communications271,108171 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    & Gumbsch, P

    Bitzek, E., Koskinen, P., G ¨ahler, F., Moseler, M. & Gumbsch, P. Structural relaxation made simple.Physical Review Letters97,170201 (2006)

    2006

  54. [62]

    & Hu, Q.-M

    Zhang, X.-C., Cao, S., Zhang, L.-J., Yang, R. & Hu, Q.-M. Unstable stacking fault energy and peierls stress for evaluating slip system competition in body-centered cubic metals.Journal of Materials Research and Technology 22,3413–3422 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    & Rodney, D

    Chaari, N., Clouet, E. & Rodney, D. First-principles study of secondary slip in zirconium.Physical review letters 112,075504 (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    & Smirnova, D

    Starikov, S. & Smirnova, D. Optimized interatomic potential for atomistic simulation of Zr-Nb alloy.Computa- tional Materials Science197,110581 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    & Grabowski, B

    Zotov, N. & Grabowski, B. Molecular dynamics simulations of screw dislocation mobility in bcc Nb.Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering29,085007 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Vineyard, G. H. Frequency factors and isotope effects in solid state rate processes.Journal of Physics and Chem- istry of Solids3,121–127 (1957)

    1957

  59. [67]

    & Holzwarth, U

    Seeger, A. & Holzwarth, U. Slip planes and kink properties of screw dislocations in high-purity niobium.Philo- sophical Magazine86,3861–3892 (2006)

    2006

  60. [68]

    & Seeger, A

    Hollang, L., Hommel, M. & Seeger, A. The Flow Stress of Ultra-High-Purity Molybdenum Single Crystals. Physica status solidi (a)160,329–354 (1997)

    1997

  61. [69]

    Comparison of flow-stress measurements on high-purity tungsten single crystals with the kink-pair theory.Materials Transactions, JIM41,152–160 (2000)

    Brunner, D. Comparison of flow-stress measurements on high-purity tungsten single crystals with the kink-pair theory.Materials Transactions, JIM41,152–160 (2000)

    2000

  62. [70]

    & Rodney, D

    Dezerald, L., Proville, L., Ventelon, L., Willaime, F. & Rodney, D. First-principles prediction of kink-pair acti- vation enthalpy on screw dislocations in bcc transition metals: V , Nb, Ta, Mo, W, and Fe.Physical Review B91, 094105 (2015)

    2015

  63. [71]

    & Moriarty, J

    Yang, L. & Moriarty, J. Kink-pair mechanisms for a/2<111>screw dislocation motion in bcc tantalum.Materi- als Science and Engineering: A319,124–129 (2001). 28

    2001

  64. [72]

    & Grabowski, B

    Zotov, N. & Grabowski, B. Entropy of kink pair formation on screw dislocations: an accelerated molecular dynamics study.Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering30,065004 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    & Marinica, M.-C

    Proville, L., Rodney, D. & Marinica, M.-C. Quantum effect on thermally activated glide of dislocations.Nature materials11,845–849 (2012)

    2012

  66. [74]

    & Bassani, J

    Vitek, V ., Mrovec, M. & Bassani, J. Influence of non-glide stresses on plastic flow: from atomistic to continuum modeling.Materials Science and Engineering: A365,31–37 (2004)

    2004

  67. [75]

    & Vitek, V

    Gr ¨oger, R., Bailey, A. & Vitek, V . Multiscale modeling of plastic deformation of molybdenum and tungsten: I. Atomistic studies of the core structure and glide of 1/2<111>screw dislocations at 0 K.Acta Materialia56, 5401–5411 (2008)

    2008

  68. [76]

    Dorn, J. E. & Rajnak, S. Nuclearion of kink pairs and the Peierls’ mechanism of plastic deformation.Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME230,1052–1064 (1963)

    1963

  69. [77]

    & Ashby, M

    Kocks, U., Argon, A. & Ashby, M. Models for macroscopic slip.Progress in Material Science19,171–229 (1975)

    1975

  70. [78]

    Po, G.et al.A phenomenological dislocation mobility law for bcc metals.Acta Materialia119,123–135 (2016)

    2016

  71. [79]

    Marinica, M.-C.et al.Interatomic potentials for modelling radiation defects and dislocations in tungsten.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter25,395502 (2013)

    2013

  72. [80]

    & Proville, L

    Rodney, D. & Proville, L. Stress-dependent Peierls potential: Influence on kink-pair activation.Physical Review B79,094108 (2009)

    2009

  73. [81]

    Nature Communications16,8367 (2025)

    Allera, A.et al.Activation entropy of dislocation glide in body-centered cubic metals from atomistic simulations. Nature Communications16,8367 (2025)

    2025

  74. [82]

    & Mendelev, M

    Gordon, P., Neeraj, T. & Mendelev, M. Screw dislocation mobility in BCC Metals: a refined potential description forα-Fe.Philosophical Magazine91,3931–3945 (2011)

    2011

  75. [83]

    Dusson, G.et al.Atomic cluster expansion: Completeness, efficiency and stability.Journal of Computational Physics454,110946 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    & Clouet, E

    Leveau, T., Ventelon, L., Marinica, M.-C. & Clouet, E. Segregation of hydrogen on screw dislocations in tungsten and its impact on dislocation mobility.Acta Materialia,121869 (2025)

    2025

  77. [85]

    & Djurabekova, F

    Byggm ¨astar, J., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Modeling refractory high-entropy alloys with efficient machine- learned interatomic potentials: Defects and segregation.Physical Review B104,104101 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    & Djurabekova, F

    Byggm ¨astar, J., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Simple machine-learned interatomic potentials for complex alloys.Physical Review Materials6,083801 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    Sobol, I. M. Distribution of points in a cube and approximate evaluation of integrals.USSR Computational Math- ematics and Mathematical Physics7,86–112 (1967). 29

    1967

Pith tools

Reviewed July 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.