pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00848 · v1 · pith:XVQJDH2Mnew · submitted 2026-07-01 · 💻 cs.CL

MetaHOPE: A Metaphor-Oriented Evaluation Framework for Analysing MT and LLM Translation Errors

Jiahui Liang , Lifeng Han This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 13:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords metaphor translationerror annotationmachine translation evaluationlarge language modelsEnglish-Chinese translationannotation frameworktranslation errors
0
0 comments X

The pith

MetaHOPE provides an error severity-aware framework to annotate and evaluate metaphor translations by MT systems and LLMs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes MetaHOPE as a specialized annotation scheme that tracks not only the presence but the severity of errors when machine translation models render metaphors. It tests the framework on three current systems—GoogleMT, GPT-5.4, and Hunyuan-7b—using existing English and Chinese metaphor corpora that are then turned into parallel resources with human post-edits. The work produces both the annotated data and an error analysis that isolates how semantic complexity, context, and cultural embedding affect translation quality. If the framework holds, it supplies a repeatable method for measuring where literal-focused metrics fall short on figurative language.

Core claim

MetaHOPE is an error severity-aware annotation framework for evaluating metaphor translations. The authors apply it to three representative systems (GoogleMT, GPT-5.4, Hunyuan-7b) on two human-annotated metaphor corpora (VUAMC and PSUCMC) for English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English directions, producing error-annotated bilingual data and human post-edited gold references as new resources.

What carries the argument

MetaHOPE, the error severity-aware annotation framework that assigns graded labels to translation mistakes specific to metaphors.

If this is right

  • Current MT and LLM outputs on metaphors can be ranked by the gravity of their failures rather than by surface overlap alone.
  • The released parallel corpora supply training and test data that explicitly mark metaphor-specific issues.
  • Error patterns identified by the framework can direct targeted fine-tuning or prompting strategies for future models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Severity labels may transfer to other non-literal constructions such as idioms or irony once the scheme is tested on them.
  • Automatic metrics could incorporate severity signals to better correlate with human judgments on figurative content.
  • The bilingual resources enable direct measurement of whether multilingual training reduces cultural embedding errors.

Load-bearing premise

Metaphors create translation problems whose severity can be judged consistently by annotators in a manner distinct from literal text.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison in which standard error categories without severity labels produce the same model rankings and error distributions as MetaHOPE on the same metaphor pairs.

read the original abstract

In this opinion paper, we propose MetaHOPE, an error severity-aware annotation framework for evaluating metaphor translations. Metaphors present challenges for machine translation (MT) and natural language understanding and processing (NLU, NLP), because it presents the features of semantic complexity, contextual dependency, and cultural embeddings that can lead to ambiguity issues for NLP models. To investigate how state-of-the-art NLP models perform on translating metaphors, we select three representative systems, i.e., GoogleMT, GPT5.4, and Hunyuan-7b as Neural MT (NMT) models and LLMs. We used two human-annotated metaphor corpora, including VUAMC and PSUCMC for English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English translation purposes. The original corpora we used are monolingual, where we carried out error annotation using the MetaHOPE framework, and also produced the human post-edited gold reference for bilingual use as a new resource. We believe the MetaHOPE evaluation framework for metaphor translation annotation, the parallel corpora resources, and the error analysis on SOTA automatic translation models can be useful and shed some light for the field of metaphor translation study. We share our resources publicly upon paper acceptance.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes MetaHOPE, an error severity-aware annotation framework for evaluating metaphor translations. It applies the framework to three systems (GoogleMT, GPT5.4, Hunyuan-7b) on the VUAMC and PSUCMC corpora for English-to-Chinese and Chinese-to-English directions, performs annotations on the originally monolingual corpora, produces post-edited gold references as new bilingual resources, and plans to release the resources publicly.

Significance. If the framework proves reliable through validation, it could supply a structured, severity-aware method for diagnosing metaphor translation failures in MT and LLMs, an area known to be difficult due to semantic and cultural factors. The released post-edited parallel corpora would constitute a concrete new resource for the community.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'the MetaHOPE evaluation framework ... and the error analysis on SOTA automatic translation models can be useful' is not supported by any reported quantitative results, error distributions, or inter-annotator agreement figures, so the utility of the proposed framework cannot be assessed from the manuscript.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'because it presents the features' should read 'because they present the features' to agree with the plural subject 'metaphors'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the model identifier 'GPT5.4' is non-standard and should be clarified (e.g., whether it denotes GPT-4 or another variant).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We address the concern point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'the MetaHOPE evaluation framework ... and the error analysis on SOTA automatic translation models can be useful' is not supported by any reported quantitative results, error distributions, or inter-annotator agreement figures, so the utility of the proposed framework cannot be assessed from the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's phrasing makes a claim about utility that is not backed by quantitative evidence such as IAA scores or error distributions within the manuscript. As the paper is explicitly positioned as an opinion paper proposing the MetaHOPE framework and describing its application to create new parallel resources, the contribution centers on the framework design and resource creation rather than a full empirical validation study. The manuscript reports the annotation process and post-editing but does not include statistical measures of reliability or detailed distributions. We will revise the abstract to remove or qualify the unsupported claim about utility and error analysis, aligning the language more closely with the opinion-paper scope and the concrete contributions that are described. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is an opinion piece proposing the MetaHOPE annotation framework for metaphor translation errors. It selects existing corpora (VUAMC, PSUCMC), applies the framework to annotate errors from three systems (GoogleMT, GPT5.4, Hunyuan-7b), and releases post-edited bilingual resources. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, derivations, or load-bearing self-citations are present; the contribution is the framework definition and resource release itself, which does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

This is an opinion paper that introduces a new named framework and applies it to existing monolingual corpora; no mathematical parameters, axioms, or external benchmarks are invoked in the abstract.

invented entities (1)
  • MetaHOPE framework no independent evidence
    purpose: Error severity-aware annotation for metaphor translations in MT and LLMs
    Newly proposed in this paper; no prior reference or independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5742 in / 1050 out tokens · 23131 ms · 2026-07-02T13:28:36.679893+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XX: Volume 1 , pages=

    Metaphors in Literary Machine Translation: Close but no cigar? , author=. Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XX: Volume 1 , pages=

  2. [2]

    machine: Comparative analysis of metaphor-related word translation by human and AI systems , author=

    Mind vs. machine: Comparative analysis of metaphor-related word translation by human and AI systems , author=. Training, Language and Culture , volume=

  3. [3]

    Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Machine Translation , pages=

    Findings of the wmt25 general machine translation shared task: Time to stop evaluating on easy test sets , author=. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Machine Translation , pages=

  4. [4]

    Target , volume=

    How metaphors are rendered in subtitles , author=. Target , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  5. [5]

    Using Technologies for Creative-Text Translation , pages=

    Catching the meaning of words: Can Google Translate convey metaphor? , author=. Using Technologies for Creative-Text Translation , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18868 , year=

    Han, Lifeng and Evang, Kilian and Bhatia, Archna and Bouma, Gosse and Do. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18868 , year=

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Multiword Expressions and Universal Dependencies (MWE-UD)@ LREC-COLING 2024 , year=

    Bhatia, Archna and Bouma, Gosse and Do. Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Multiword Expressions and Universal Dependencies (MWE-UD)@ LREC-COLING 2024 , year=

    2024

  8. [8]

    Proceedings of the 19th Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE 2023). 2023

    2023

  9. [9]

    Language Resources and Evaluation , volume=

    Towards a resource for multilingual lexicons: an MT assisted and human-in-the-loop multilingual parallel corpus with multi-word expression annotation , author=. Language Resources and Evaluation , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  10. [10]

    Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    MMTE: Corpus and metrics for evaluating machine translation quality of metaphorical language , author=. Proceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing , pages=

    2024

  11. [11]

    Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages=

    HOPE: A task-oriented and human-centric evaluation framework using professional post-editing towards more effective MT evaluation , author=. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages=

  12. [12]

    CL4Health WS at LREC2026, Palma, Spain , year=

    Dutch Metaphor Extraction from Cancer Patients' Interviews and Forum Data using LLMs and Human in the Loop , author=. CL4Health WS at LREC2026, Palma, Spain , year=

  13. [13]

    Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology , month=

    Overview of the CLPsych 2026 Shared Task: Capturing and Characterizing Mental Health Changes through Social Media Timeline Dynamics , author=. Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology , month=

    2026

  14. [14]

    Overview of the CLP sych 2025 Shared Task: Capturing Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines

    Tseriotou, Talia and Chim, Jenny and Klein, Ayal and Shamir, Aya and Dvir, Guy and Ali, Iqra and Kennedy, Cian and Singh Kohli, Guneet and Hills, Anthony and Zirikly, Ayah and Atzil-Slonim, Dana and Liakata, Maria. Overview of the CLP sych 2025 Shared Task: Capturing Mental Health Dynamics from Social Media Timelines. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on C...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.clpsych-1.16 2025

  15. [15]

    2025 , month = oct, publisher =

    Atzil-Slonim, Dana , title =. 2025 , month = oct, publisher =. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/SJE8C , url =

    work page doi:10.17605/osf.io/sje8c 2025

  16. [16]

    Overview of the CLP sych 2022 Shared Task: Capturing Moments of Change in Longitudinal User Posts

    Tsakalidis, Adam and Chim, Jenny and Bilal, Iman Munire and Zirikly, Ayah and Atzil-Slonim, Dana and Nanni, Federico and Resnik, Philip and Gaur, Manas and Roy, Kaushik and Inkster, Becky and Leintz, Jeff and Liakata, Maria. Overview of the CLP sych 2022 Shared Task: Capturing Moments of Change in Longitudinal User Posts. Proceedings of the Eighth Worksho...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2022.clpsych-1.16 2022

  17. [17]

    Practice-Based Evidence in the Psychological Therapies: Toward Policy Implications for Research, Training, and Clinical Guidelines , editor =

    Atzil-Slonim, Dana , title =. Practice-Based Evidence in the Psychological Therapies: Toward Policy Implications for Research, Training, and Clinical Guidelines , editor =. 2026 , url =

    2026

  18. [18]

    Prompt Engineering for Capturing Dynamic Mental Health Self States from Social Media Posts

    Chan, Callum and Khunkhun, Sunveer and Inkpen, Diana and Lossio-Ventura, Juan Antonio. Prompt Engineering for Capturing Dynamic Mental Health Self States from Social Media Posts. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025). 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.clpsych-1.22

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.clpsych-1.22 2025

  19. [19]

    A Systematic Evaluation of LLM Strategies for Mental Health Text Analysis: Fine-tuning vs

    Kermani, Arshia and Perez-Rosas, Veronica and Metsis, Vangelis. A Systematic Evaluation of LLM Strategies for Mental Health Text Analysis: Fine-tuning vs. Prompt Engineering vs. RAG. Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology (CLPsych 2025). 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.clpsych-1.14

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.clpsych-1.14 2025

  20. [20]

    Translational Psychiatry , volume=

    Natural language processing for mental health interventions: a systematic review and research framework , author=. Translational Psychiatry , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  21. [21]

    Journal of medical Internet research , volume=

    Machine learning and natural language processing in mental health: systematic review , author=. Journal of medical Internet research , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  22. [22]

    2017 , publisher=

    Studying scientific metaphor in translation , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  23. [23]

    Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing (CL4Health) , pages=

    LT3: Generating medication prescriptions with conditional transformer , author=. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing (CL4Health) , pages=

  24. [24]

    MaLei at MultiClinSUM: Summarisation of Clinical Documents using Perspective-Aware Iterative Self-Prompting with LLMs , author=

  25. [25]

    Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing (CL4Health) , pages=

    The manchester bees at peranssumm 2025: Iterative self-prompting with claude and o1 for perspective-aware healthcare answer summarisation , author=. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing (CL4Health) , pages=

    2025

  26. [26]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01910 , year=

    FLANS at SemEval-2026 Task 7: RAG with Open-Sourced Smaller LLMs for Everyday Knowledge Across Diverse Languages and Cultures , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.01910 , year=

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    The Correlation Between Emotion in Text and Speech Segments is Limited: A Cross-Modal Study

    Lindevelt, David and Verberne, Suzan and Broekens, Joost. The Correlation Between Emotion in Text and Speech Segments is Limited: A Cross-Modal Study. Findings of the A ssociation for C omputational L inguistics: EACL 2026. 2026. doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.136

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2026.findings-eacl.136 2026

  28. [28]

    Informatica , volume=

    An enhanced aspect-based sentiment analysis model based on roberta for text sentiment analysis , author=. Informatica , volume=

  29. [29]

    Ieee Access , volume=

    Comparative analysis of deep natural networks and large language models for aspect-based sentiment analysis , author=. Ieee Access , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  30. [30]

    Applied Intelligence , volume=

    An improved aspect-category sentiment analysis model for text sentiment analysis based on RoBERTa , author=. Applied Intelligence , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  31. [31]

    Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020 , pages=

    Aspect-based sentiment analysis of scientific reviews , author=. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020 , pages=

    2020

  32. [32]

    Knowledge-based systems , volume=

    Aspect-based sentiment analysis via affective knowledge enhanced graph convolutional networks , author=. Knowledge-based systems , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  33. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=

    A survey on aspect-based sentiment analysis: Tasks, methods, and challenges , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  34. [34]

    Scientific Reports , volume=

    Triple dimensional psychology knowledge encouraging graph attention networks to exploit aspect-based sentiment analysis , author=. Scientific Reports , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  35. [35]

    Overview of the SIGHAN 2024 shared task for C hinese dimensional aspect-based sentiment analysis

    Lee, Lung-Hao and Yu, Liang-Chih and Wang, Suge and Liao, Jian. Overview of the SIGHAN 2024 shared task for C hinese dimensional aspect-based sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 10th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing (SIGHAN-10). 2024

    2024

  36. [36]

    2026 , eprint=

    DimStance: Multilingual Datasets for Dimensional Stance Analysis , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  37. [37]

    2026 , eprint=

    DimABSA: Building Multilingual and Multidomain Datasets for Dimensional Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  38. [38]

    Electronics , volume=

    A hybrid approach to dimensional aspect-based sentiment analysis using Bert and large language models , author=. Electronics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  39. [39]

    2019 , eprint=

    Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework , author=. 2019 , eprint=

    2019

  40. [40]

    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) , year =

    VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text , author =. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) , year =

  41. [41]

    Medication Extraction and Entity Linking using Stacked and Voted Ensembles on LLM s

    Romero, Pablo and Han, Lifeng and Nenadic, Goran. Medication Extraction and Entity Linking using Stacked and Voted Ensembles on LLM s. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing (CL4Health). 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.cl4health-1.26

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.cl4health-1.26 2025

  42. [42]

    Aspect -- Sentiment Quad Prediction with Distilled Large Language Models

    Ventirozos, Filippos Karolos and Appleby, Peter and Shardlow, Matthew. Aspect -- Sentiment Quad Prediction with Distilled Large Language Models. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing - Natural Language Processing in the Generative AI Era. 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    and Shardlow, Matthew

    Ventirozos, Filippos and Appleby, Peter A. and Shardlow, Matthew. Are You Sure You ' re Positive? Consolidating Chain-of-Thought Agents with Uncertainty Quantification for Aspect-Category Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025). 2025. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.22

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.22 2025

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13953 , year=

    ReviewGraph: A Knowledge Graph Embedding Based Framework for Review Rating Prediction with Sentiment Features , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13953 , year=

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , volume=

    Issues and challenges of aspect-based sentiment analysis: A comprehensive survey , author=. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  46. [46]

    Vu amsterdam metaphor corpus , author=

  47. [47]

    2010b , publisher=

    A method for linguistic metaphor identification , author=. 2010b , publisher=

  48. [48]

    Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages=

    On context span needed for machine translation evaluation , author=. Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages=

  49. [49]

    Corpus Pragmatics , volume=

    DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use , author=. Corpus Pragmatics , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  50. [50]

    2016 , publisher=

    Translation, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame , author=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  51. [51]

    Metaphor and symbol , volume=

    MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse , author=. Metaphor and symbol , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

    2007

  52. [52]

    1965 , publisher=

    A linguistic theory of translation , author=. 1965 , publisher=

    1965

  53. [53]

    1992 , institution=

    In other words: a coursebook on translation , author=. 1992 , institution=

    1992

  54. [54]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Lost in alignment: A survey on cross-lingual alignment methods for contextualized representation , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  55. [55]

    Benjamins translation library , volume=

    Ethics of translation , author=. Benjamins translation library , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  56. [56]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 , pages=

    Enhancing cross-lingual sentence embedding for low-resource languages with word alignment , author=. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024 , pages=

    2024

  57. [57]

    International Journal of English Linguistics , volume=

    A corpus-aided study of shifts in English-to-Chinese translation of prepositions , author=. International Journal of English Linguistics , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  58. [58]

    Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages=

    Measuring uncertainty in translation quality evaluation (TQE) , author=. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference , pages=

  59. [59]

    2013 , publisher=

    Translation studies , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  60. [60]

    2008 , publisher=

    Translation in global news , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  61. [61]

    11th Conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics , pages=

    A clustering approach for nearly unsupervised recognition of nonliteral language , author=. 11th Conference of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics , pages=

  62. [62]

    Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language , pages=

    Active learning for the identification of nonliteral language , author=. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language , pages=

  63. [63]

    2008 , publisher=

    Metaphor in discourse , author=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  64. [64]

    Brno studies in English , volume=

    Multi-functionality of metaphor in newspaper discourse , author=. Brno studies in English , volume=

  65. [65]

    Brno studies in English , volume=

    Coercive metaphors in news headlines: A cognitive-pragmatic approach , author=. Brno studies in English , volume=

  66. [66]

    Proceedings of the workshop on figurative language processing , pages=

    A report on the 2018 VUA metaphor detection shared task , author=. Proceedings of the workshop on figurative language processing , pages=

    2018

  67. [67]

    Proceedings of the second workshop on figurative language processing , pages=

    A report on the 2020 VUA and TOEFL metaphor detection shared task , author=. Proceedings of the second workshop on figurative language processing , pages=

    2020

  68. [68]

    Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics , volume=

    Mapping metaphor research in translation and interpreting studies: a bibliometric analysis from 1964 to 2023 , author=. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    1964

  69. [69]

    2010a , publisher=

    Metaphor: A practical introduction , author=. 2010a , publisher=

  70. [70]

    Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica , volume=

    Metaphor and culture , author=. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica , volume=. 2010b , publisher=

  71. [71]

    2005 , publisher=

    Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  72. [72]

    and Doh, Joon Young and Rodan, Eid and Zhu, Kevin and O ' Brien, Sean

    Donthi, Sundesh and Spencer, Maximilian and Patel, Om B. and Doh, Joon Young and Rodan, Eid and Zhu, Kevin and O ' Brien, Sean. Improving LLM Abilities in Idiomatic Translation. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Language Models for Low-Resource Languages. 2025

    2025

  73. [73]

    International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de S

    A Comparative Study of Humans and Machine Learning in Metaphor Detection: Translations of Legal Metaphors in English and Turkish HUDOC Judgments , author=. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de S. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  74. [74]

    Intercultural Pragmatics , volume=

    Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues , author=. Intercultural Pragmatics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  75. [75]

    Computer-assisted literary translation , pages=

    Metaphor in literary machine translation: style, creativity and literariness , author=. Computer-assisted literary translation , pages=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  76. [76]

    Language Resources and Evaluation , volume=

    Towards a metaphor-annotated corpus of Mandarin Chinese , author=. Language Resources and Evaluation , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  77. [77]

    Benjamins Translation Library , year=

    Descriptive Translation Studies--and beyond , author=. Benjamins Translation Library , year=

  78. [78]

    Multidimensional quality metrics (MQM): A framework for declaring and describing translation quality metrics , author=. Tradum

  79. [79]

    Aho and Jeffrey D

    Alfred V. Aho and Jeffrey D. Ullman , title =. 1972

    1972

  80. [80]

    Publications Manual , year = "1983", publisher =

    1983

Showing first 80 references.