Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Quantum magnetism of the spin-1 kagome-lattice antiferromagnet

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The spin-1 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet shows magnetization plateaus at m=0, 1/3, 7/9 and 8/9, with jumps at three edges, and a double-peak specific heat whose low-T peak may mark trimer valence-bond-crystal order.

desk verdict Solid, carefully scoped ED/FTLM benchmarks for the spin-1 kagome Heisenberg model; plateaus and structures are well supported within the usual finite-size limits, and the work is useful for experiment without overclaiming. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03086 v1 pith:TOTPYNO5 submitted 2026-07-03 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Katsuhiro Morita This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-1kagomelatticeHeisenbergantiferromagnetmagnetizationplateaustrimervalence-bondcrystalmagnonfinite-temperatureLanczosmethodspecificheatquantummagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper maps the field-driven and thermal physics of the ideal spin-1 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice with large-scale Lanczos and finite-temperature Lanczos calculations. At zero temperature the magnetization process contains plateaus at normalized magnetizations m=0, 1/3, 7/9 and 8/9; the zero-field plateau is a trimer valence-bond crystal that breaks rotational symmetry, while the two high-field plateaus are magnon crystals (the m=8/9 state being the exact localized-magnon crystal). Smoothed energy densities further indicate first-order jumps at the lower edge of the m=1/3 plateau and the upper edges of the m=7/9 and 8/9 plateaus. At finite temperature the specific heat develops a double-peak structure, the lower peak near T/J≃0.1 possibly signalling trimer ordering, while magnetization curves show that only the m=1/3 plateau survives thermal rounding at accessible temperatures. The resulting susceptibility, specific-heat and magnetization data supply concrete benchmarks against which candidate Ni^{2+} and V^{3+} kagome materials can be compared.

What carries the argument

Finite-cluster Lanczos spectra of the lowest energy in each magnetization sector, combined with a Gaussian-kernel smoothing of the discrete energy density e(m) that reconstructs a continuous magnetization curve, plus bond, dimer–dimer and structure-factor correlators that identify the plateau states.

What would settle it

A high-field magnetization measurement on a clean spin-1 kagome material that fails to show a jump or narrow plateau near m=7/9, or a specific-heat curve that lacks a low-temperature anomaly near T/J≃0.1, would contradict the central claims.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Large-scale Lanczos diagonalization and finite-temperature Lanczos calculations establish that the spin-1 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet possesses magnetization plateaus at m=0 (trimer valence-bond crystal), m=1/3, m=7/9 and m=8/9 (magnon crystals), together with magnetization jumps at the lower-field edge of the m=1/3 plateau and the upper-field edges of the m=7/9 and 8/9 plateaus; the specific heat exhibits a double-peak structure whose low-temperature peak may be linked to trimer-VBC formation, and the m=1/3 plateau remains visible at low but finite temperature while the high-field plateaus melt rapidly.

Load-bearing premise

The plateaus, jumps and microscopic characters deduced from clusters of at most 45 sites (and 27 sites for thermodynamics), after Gaussian-kernel smoothing, already represent the thermodynamic limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Experimental magnetization curves of candidate spin-1 kagome compounds should display a robust m=1/3 plateau that survives up to roughly T/J≃0.1, while the m=7/9 and 8/9 plateaus require temperatures below T/J≃0.05 to be resolved.
  • Specific-heat measurements should exhibit a double-peak structure with a sharp low-temperature feature near T/J≃0.1 that can be tested for association with trimer valence-bond-crystal order.
  • The exact m=8/9 localized-magnon crystal and the analogous m=7/9 magnon crystal supply clear microscopic targets for neutron-scattering or NMR studies once high-field plateaus are observed.
  • Deviations of real-material data from the present susceptibility, specific-heat and magnetization benchmarks can be used to quantify the strength of single-ion anisotropy, Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya couplings or further-neighbor exchanges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the low-temperature specific-heat peak is indeed a finite-temperature transition into the trimer valence-bond crystal, then two-dimensional discrete symmetry breaking is realized in a simple Heisenberg model and becomes a natural target for classical Monte Carlo or tensor-network finite-temperature studies.
  • The incomplete microscopic characterization of the m=1/3 plateau (competing q=0 uud, √3×√3 uud and partial magnon-crystal signals) suggests that larger-system DMRG or iPEPS work could still tip the balance among these candidates.
  • The same Gaussian-kernel smoothing protocol that recovers known magnetization curves for the spin-1/2 chain and triangular lattice can be applied to other frustrated magnets whose exact-diagonalization data remain staircase-like.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the spin-1 kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet by large-scale Lanczos diagonalization (N up to 45) and finite-temperature Lanczos methods (OFTLM/RFTLM on N=21,24,27). It reports zero-temperature magnetization plateaus at m=0, 1/3, 7/9 and 8/9. The m=0 state is identified as a trimer valence-bond crystal (supported by exact twofold degeneracy and bond correlations on N=27); the m=8/9 plateau is the exact localized-magnon crystal, and m=7/9 is argued to be a related magnon crystal from dimer–dimer correlations on N=36. A Gaussian-kernel smoothing of the discrete e(m) data is used to visualize possible magnetization jumps at the lower edge of m=1/3 and the upper edges of m=7/9 and 8/9. Finite-temperature results show a double-peak specific heat (peaks near T/J ≃ 0.1 and 1.1), a susceptibility maximum near T ≃ 0.4, and that the m=1/3 plateau remains visible at low T while the high-field plateaus are rapidly thermally smeared. The work is presented as benchmark data for candidate spin-1 kagome materials.

Significance. The paper supplies carefully controlled numerical benchmarks for an experimentally relevant model whose zero- and finite-temperature field-induced properties have been less thoroughly mapped than those of the spin-1/2 kagome antiferromagnet. Strengths include the exact localized-magnon construction for m=8/9, the exact twofold degeneracy and clear trimer bond pattern on N=27, dimer–dimer maps supporting magnon-crystal character at m=7/9, explicit FTLM error estimates from random-vector sampling, and openly scoped claims that leave the microscopic structure of the m=1/3 plateau unresolved. These results are directly useful for interpreting susceptibility, specific heat, and high-field magnetization data on Ni2+ and V3+ kagome compounds.

major comments (1)
  1. No load-bearing technical errors were found. The central claims are carefully scoped to finite-cluster evidence plus openly acknowledged caveats (exact m=8/9 construction; N=27 degeneracy and bond pattern for trimer VBC; dimer–dimer support for m=7/9; m=1/3 structure left open). The Gaussian-kernel procedure (Sec. 2.4 and SM) is used only as a visualization aid after plateaus and jumps have already been identified from raw Lanczos staircases, so residual finite-size effects do not undermine the stated claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. Sec. 3.2.3 and Fig. 5: the m=1/3 structure remains ambiguous (comparable Sz(q) weight at q1 and q2, only partial magnon-crystal dimer pattern). A short explicit statement that larger-system methods (DMRG/iPEPS) will be needed would help readers who might otherwise over-read the present data.
  2. Sec. 3.3.1: the suggestion that the low-T specific-heat peak may signal a finite-T trimer-VBC transition is interesting but rests on finite clusters. Softening the language to “possible signature of ordering or a robust crossover” would better match the evidence.
  3. Fig. 7 and SM Fig. S3: residual finite-size staircase structure is still visible at T=0.05. A brief remark that quantitative plateau widths at this temperature should be treated cautiously would improve clarity.
  4. SM Sec. 7: the Gaussian-kernel hyperparameters (ℓ, λ) and the regional division of m are stated; a one-sentence note that the jump locations are robust under modest variation of ℓ would further reassure readers that the visualization is not fine-tuned.
  5. Minor typographical consistency: normalize spacing around m= values and T/J symbols across the abstract, Fig. 1 caption, and Sec. 3.3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: plateaus, jumps, and correlations are obtained from direct Lanczos/FTLM diagonalization of a fixed Hamiltonian; smoothing is an openly auxiliary visualization step.

full rationale

The load-bearing results follow from computing the lowest energy E0(M) in each fixed-magnetization sector of the nearest-neighbor spin-1 kagome Heisenberg Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–2) on finite clusters, then reading plateaus and jumps from the resulting staircase magnetization curves (Fig. 2) and from bond, structure-factor, and dimer–dimer correlators (Figs. 3–5). The m=8/9 plateau and its upper-edge jump are the known exact localized-magnon construction, not a fit. The Gaussian-kernel smoother (Sec. 2.4, Supp. Sec. 7) is introduced only after the plateaus have already been identified from raw Lanczos data; the paper states that identification of plateaus and jumps is based on the Lanczos results, that jump locations are not imposed a priori, and that the smoother is a visualization aid whose hyperparameters are checked against low-T FTLM curves and against exact/high-accuracy benchmarks on the 1D chain and triangular lattice. Self-citations are to the author’s prior methodological papers on improved FTLM schemes and do not define or force the physical target quantities. Finite-size limitations are ordinary caveats of the method, not circular reductions. No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own fitted input or to an unverified self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard nearest-neighbor spin-1 Heisenberg Hamiltonian, the validity of Lanczos/FTLM on the listed finite clusters, and a small set of numerical hyperparameters for smoothing and stochastic sampling. No new physical entities are postulated; all free parameters are technical controls whose values are stated.

free parameters (3)
  • Gaussian-kernel width ℓ = 0.3
    Hyperparameter controlling the smoothness of eker(m); set to 0.3 for the kagome data (Supplementary Material).
  • regularization λ = 1.0e-6
    Tikhonov parameter in the linear system that determines kernel coefficients; set to 1e-6.
  • FTLM sampling parameters (R, NL, NV) = cluster-dependent (e.g. R=20, NL=300 for N=27)
    Number of random vectors, Krylov dimension and number of explicitly kept low-lying states; chosen for numerical accuracy on each cluster size (Supplementary Material).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The system is described by the pure nearest-neighbor spin-1 Heisenberg Hamiltonian H = J ∑⟨i,j⟩ Si·Sj − h ∑i Szi with J=1.
    Stated in Eq. (1); all subsequent results are properties of this model.
  • domain assumption Periodic-boundary clusters of size N≤45 (T=0) and N≤27 (finite T) capture the essential physics of the thermodynamic limit for the reported plateaus and thermodynamic peaks.
    Implicit throughout Sections 2–3; finite-size effects are discussed but not eliminated.
  • standard math Lanczos and improved FTLM (OFTLM/RFTLM) converge to the exact lowest energies and thermal averages within the quoted stochastic errors.
    Standard numerical linear-algebra assumption; error bars from random-vector sampling are shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum magnetism of the spin-1 kagome-lattice antiferromagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TOTPYNO5

@misc{pith2026260703086,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum magnetism of the spin-1 kagome-lattice antiferromagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TOTPYNO5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03086}
}
abstract

We investigate the spin-1 kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet using large-scale Lanczos diagonalization and the finite-temperature Lanczos method. The zero-temperature magnetization process exhibits plateaus at $m=0$, $1/3$, $7/9$, and $8/9$, where $m$ is the normalized magnetization. The $m=0$ plateau is identified as a trimer valence-bond-crystal state, while the high-field plateaus at $m=7/9$ and $8/9$ are identified as magnon crystals. In particular, the $m=8/9$ plateau corresponds to the exact localized-magnon crystal state. A smoothed zero-temperature magnetization curve constructed using the Gaussian-kernel smoothing method indicates magnetization jumps at the lower-field edge of the $m=1/3$ plateau and at the upper-field edges of the $m=7/9$ and $8/9$ plateaus. At finite temperatures, the specific heat exhibits a double-peak structure with peaks around $T/J\simeq0.1$ and $T/J\simeq1.1$, and the low-temperature peak may be related to trimer valence-bond-crystal ordering. The finite-temperature magnetization curves show that the $m=1/3$ plateau remains visible at low temperatures, whereas the high-field plateaus are rapidly smeared out by thermal effects. These results provide benchmark data for thermodynamic and high-field magnetization measurements in candidate spin-1 kagome-lattice materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03086 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Zero-temperature magnetization curve of the spin-1 kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Zero-temperature magnetization process of the spin-1 kagome-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Bond correlations in the m = 0 ground state for the N = 27 cluster. To select one symmetry￾broken component of the exactly twofold-degenerate ground-state subspace, the exchange interactions on the up triangles are increased from J = 1 to J = 1 + 10−5 . The solid and dashed lines represent bond correlations of −0.7633 and −0.6552, respectively. plateau and the upper-field edge of the m = 7/9 plateau. The reliability… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dimer–dimer correlations in the m = 7/9 ground state for the N = 36 cluster. The black line represents the reference dimer. Red and blue lines indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. The line thickness represents the magnitude of the correlation. Hex…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Magnetic correlations in the m = 1/3 ground state for the N = 27 cluster. (a) Longitudinal spin structure factor S z (q). The labels q1 and q2 denote representative wave-vector positions corresponding to the q = 0 uud structure and the √ 3 × √ 3 uud structure, respecti…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Zero-field thermodynamic quantities for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Finite-temperature magnetization curves. (a) Comparison between the low-temperature magne [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Morita and T

    K. Morita and T. Tohyama, Finite-temperature properties of the Kitaev-Heisenberg models on kagome and triangular lattices studied by improved finite-temperature Lanczos methods, Phys. Rev. Research 2 (2020) 013205

    2020

  2. [2]

    Nakamura, Machine learning as an improved estimator for magnetization curve and spin gap, Sci

    T. Nakamura, Machine learning as an improved estimator for magnetization curve and spin gap, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 14201

    2020

  3. [3]

    Yamamoto, G

    D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, and I. Danshita, Magnetization process of spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets on a layered triangular lattice, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 (2016) 024706

    2016

  4. [4]

    D. J. J. Farnell, R. Zinke, J. Richter, and J. Schulenburg, High-order coupled cluster method study of frustrated and unfrustrated quantum magnets in external magnetic fields, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 (2009) 406002

    2009

  5. [5]

    Nature , volume =

    Balents, Leon , title =. Nature , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  6. [6]

    and Bernu, B

    Lecheminant, P. and Bernu, B. and Lhuillier, C. and Pierre, L. and Sindzingre, P. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1997 , doi =

    1997

  7. [7]

    and Everts, H.-U

    Waldtmann, C. and Everts, H.-U. and Bernu, B. and Lhuillier, C. and Sindzingre, P. and Lecheminant, P. and Pierre, L. , title =. Eur. Phys. J. B , volume =. 1998 , doi =

    1998

  8. [8]

    and Schulenburg, J

    Honecker, A. and Schulenburg, J. and Richter, J. , title =. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Nakano, Hiroki and Sakai, Toru , title =. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  2. [10]

    and Richter, Johannes , title =

    Capponi, Sylvain and Derzhko, Oleg and Honecker, Andreas and L\"auchli, Andreas M. and Richter, Johannes , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  3. [11]

    Nishimoto, Satoshi and Shibata, Naokazu and Hotta, Chisa , title =. Nat. Commun. , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  4. [12]

    Picot, Thibaut and Ziegler, Marc and Or\'us, Rom\'an and Poilblanc, Didier , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2016 , doi =

    2016

  5. [13]

    and Huse, D

    Yan, S. and Huse, D. A. and White, S. R. , title =. Science , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  6. [14]

    and Schollw\"ock, Ulrich , title =

    Depenbrock, Stefan and McCulloch, Ian P. and Schollw\"ock, Ulrich , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  7. [15]

    Mei, Jia-Wei and Chen, Ji-Yao and He, Huan and Wen, Xiao-Gang , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  8. [16]

    and Wen, Xiao-Gang , title =

    Ran, Ying and Hermele, Michael and Lee, Patrick A. and Wen, Xiao-Gang , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  9. [17]

    Liao, H. J. and Xie, Z. Y. and Chen, J. and Liu, Z. Y. and Xie, H. D. and Huang, R. Z. and Normand, B. and Xiang, T. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  10. [18]

    and Oshikawa, Masaki and Pollmann, Frank , title =

    He, Yin-Chen and Zaletel, Michael P. and Oshikawa, Masaki and Pollmann, Frank , title =. Phys. Rev. X , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  11. [19]

    Singh, Rajiv R. P. and Huse, David A. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  12. [20]

    Hwang, Kyusung and Kim, Yong Baek and Yu, Jaejun and Park, Kwon , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  13. [21]

    Fang, Da-zhi and Xi, Ning and Ran, Shi-Ju and Su, Gang , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  14. [22]

    Morita, Katsuhiro , title =. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  15. [23]

    Cheng, Rong and Li, Tao , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  16. [24]

    Derzhko, Oleg and Richter, Johannes and Maksymenko, Mykola , title =. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  17. [25]

    urgen and Schulenburg, J\

    Schnack, J\"urgen and Schulenburg, J\"org and Honecker, Andreas and Richter, Johannes , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  18. [26]

    Jeon, Sungmin and Wulferding, Dirk and Choi, Youngsu and Lee, Seungyeol and Nam, Kiwan and Kim, Kee and Lee, Minseong and Jang, Tae-Hwan and Park, Jae-Hoon and Lee, Suheon and Choi, Sungkyun and Lee, Chanhyeon and Nojiri, Hiroyuki and Choi, Kwangyong , title =. Nat. Phys. , vo...

    2024

  19. [27]

    and Asaba, T

    Suetsugu, S. and Asaba, T. and Kasahara, Y. and Kohsaka, Y. and Totsuka, K. and Li, B. and Zhao, Y. and Li, Y. and Tokunaga, M. and Matsuda, Y. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  20. [28]

    and Blawat, Joanna and Singleton, John and Li, Shiliang and Lee, Patrick A

    Zheng, Guoxin and Zhu, Yuan and Chen, Kuan-Wen and Kang, Byungmin and Zhang, Dechen and Jenkins, Kaila and Chan, Aaron and Zeng, Zhenyuan and Xu, Aini and Valenzuela, Oscar A. and Blawat, Joanna and Singleton, John and Li, Shiliang and Lee, Patrick A. and Li, Lu , title =. Pro...

    2025

  21. [29]

    and Blawat, Joanna and Bangura, Alimamy F

    Zheng, Guoxin and Zhang, Dechen and Zhu, Yuan and Chen, Kuan-Wen and Chan, Aaron and Jenkins, Kaila and Kang, Byungmin and Zeng, Zhenyuan and Xu, Aini and Ratkovski, D. and Blawat, Joanna and Bangura, Alimamy F. and Singleton, John and Lee, Patrick A. and Li, Shiliang and Li, ...

    2025

  22. [30]

    , title =

    Hayashi, Hiroaki and Li, Han and Song, Feng-Feng and Zhou, Xu-Guang and Matsuo, Akira and Kim, Taeyun and Lv, Enze and Ishii, Yuto and Qu, Zhe and Su, Gang and Kindo, Koichi and Choi, Kwang-Yong and Li, Wei and Matsuda, Yasuhiro H. , title =. 2026 , note =

    2026

  23. [31]

    Hida, Kazuo , title =. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. 2000 , doi =

    2000

  24. [32]

    Nishimoto, Satoshi and Nakamura, Masaaki , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  25. [33]

    Changlani, Hitesh J. and L. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  26. [34]

    Liu, Tao and Li, Wei and Weichselbaum, Andreas and von Delft, Jan and Su, Gang , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  27. [35]

    Nakano, Hiroki and Sakai, Toru , title =. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  28. [36]

    Miiller, Wojciech and Christensen, Mogens and Khan, Arfhan and Sharma, Neeraj and Macquart, R. B. and Avdeev, Maxim and McIntyre, G. J. and Piltz, R. O. and Ling, C. D. , title =. Chem. Mater. , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  29. [37]

    and Chisnell, Robin and McQueen, Tyrel M

    Freedman, Danna E. and Chisnell, Robin and McQueen, Tyrel M. and Lee, Young S. and Payen, Christophe and Nocera, Daniel G. , title =. Chem. Commun. , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  30. [38]

    and Ueda, H

    Goto, M. and Ueda, H. and Michioka, C. and Matsuo, A. and Kindo, K. and Sugawara, K. and Kobayashi, S. and Katayama, N. and Sawa, H. and Yoshimura, K. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  31. [39]

    Silverstein, H. J. and Sinclair, R. and Sharma, A. Z. and Qiu, Y. and Heinmaa, I. and Leitm. Phys. Rev. Materials , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  32. [40]

    and Brambleby, Jamie and Goddard, Paul A

    Manson, Jamie L. and Brambleby, Jamie and Goddard, Paul A. and Spurgeon, Peter M. and Villa, Jacqueline A. and Liu, Junjie and Ghannadzadeh, Saman and Foronda, Francesca and Singleton, John and Lancaster, Tom and Clark, Stewart J. and Thomas, Iorwerth O. and Xiao, Fan and Will...

    2018

  33. [41]

    Connolly, E. T. and Reeves, P. and Boldrin, D. and Wills, A. S. , title =. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  34. [42]

    and Ramanathan, A

    Jiang, N. and Ramanathan, A. and Baumbach, R. E. and La Pierre, H. S. , title =. Chem. Sci. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  35. [43]

    Li, Boqiang and Wan, Zongtang and Song, Yiru and Ma, Zhaohua and Zhao, Yuqian and Wang, Junfeng and Li, Yuesheng , title =. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  36. [44]

    Connolly, E. T. and Wardell, J. and Boldrin, D. and Tang, C. C. and Wills, A. S. , title =. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  37. [45]

    Haraguchi, Yuya and Yamaura, Jun-ichi and Matsuo, Akira and Kindo, Koichi and Katori, Hiroko Aruga , title =. Phys. Rev. Materials , volume =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  38. [46]

    Jakli. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1994 , doi =

    1994

  39. [47]

    Nakamura, Tota , title =. Sci. Rep. , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  40. [48]

    and Tohyama, T

    Shibata, Y. and Tohyama, T. and Maekawa, S. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2001 , doi =

    2001

  41. [49]

    Shannon, Nic and Schmidt, Burkhard and Penc, Karlo and Thalmeier, Peter , title =. Eur. Phys. J. B , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  42. [50]

    Zerec, Ivica and Schmidt, Burkhard and Thalmeier, Peter , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  43. [51]

    Schmidt, Burkhard and Thalmeier, Peter and Shannon, Nic , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2007 , doi =

    2007

  44. [52]

    Schnack, J. Eur. Phys. J. B , volume =. 2013 , doi =

    2013

  45. [53]

    Morita, Katsuhiro and Tohyama, Takami , title =. Phys. Rev. Research , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  46. [54]

    urgen and Schulenburg, J\

    Schnack, J\"urgen and Schulenburg, J\"org and Richter, Johannes , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  47. [55]

    Seki, Kazuhiro and Yunoki, Seiji , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  48. [56]

    Richter, Johannes and Derzhko, Oleg and Schnack, J. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  49. [57]

    Morita, Katsuhiro , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2022 , doi =

    2022

  50. [58]

    Richter, Johannes and Schnack, J. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  51. [59]

    Morita, Katsuhiro , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  52. [60]

    Hutak, Taras and Krokhmalskii, Taras and Schnack, J. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  53. [61]

    Sch. Z. Naturforsch. A , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  54. [62]

    Honecker, Andreas and Zhitomirsky, M. E. and Wietek, Alexander and Richter, Johannes , title =. Z. Naturforsch. A , volume =. 2026 , doi =

    2026

  55. [63]

    and Honecker, A

    Schulenburg, J. and Honecker, A. and Schnack, J. and Richter, J. and Schmidt, H.-J. , title =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2002 , doi =

    2002

  56. [64]

    Zhitomirsky, M. E. and Tsunetsugu, H. , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2004 , doi =

    2004

  57. [65]

    Nakano, Hiroki and Sakai, T\^. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  58. [66]

    Shimokawa, Tokuro , title =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  59. [67]

    Nature , volume =

    Larrea Jim. Nature , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.