Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 73 references

Integrating out algebraic distortion in metric-affine gravity generates the entire inflaton kinetic term, and for monomial models the observables depend only on the exponent ratio.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 01:31 UTC pith:ZFHYP3HA

load-bearing objection Clean analytic result: general algebraic distortion sources the entire kinetic term, and for monomial models the 13 constants drop out of ns,r; the large-field step that produces that drop-out is the softest point but not fatal. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03566 v1 pith:ZFHYP3HA submitted 2026-07-03 astro-ph.CO

Inflation with nondynamic distortion to leading order in slow roll

Ali Hassan This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords inflationmetric-affine gravitydistortionPalatini formulationspectral indextensor-to-scalar ratioalpha-attractorsslow-roll
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies single-field inflation in metric-affine gravity, where the connection is independent of the metric. The author writes a projectively invariant action that includes every second-order algebraic distortion term and every first-order single-derivative distortion term coupled to a scalar field, plus Einstein–Hilbert and potential terms. Because the distortion equation is algebraic to leading order in slow roll, the distortion can be solved and substituted back in analytically. The result is an effective scalar theory whose whole kinetic term comes from the distortion, with a kinetic function fixed by the original thirteen coupling constants. For a monomial distortion coupling the inflationary predictions simplify sharply: with a monomial potential they depend only on the ratio of exponents (the constants drop out), while alpha-attractor and non-minimally coupled cases recover modified Starobinsky tracks controlled by one parameter.

Core claim

After the algebraic distortion is integrated out of a projectively invariant metric-affine action containing all quadratic algebraic and linear first-derivative distortion terms, the effective theory is a single-field model whose entire kinetic term is sourced by distortion. The kinetic coupling function is fixed by the thirteen free starting constants. For monomial distortion coupling and a monomial potential, the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio depend only on the ratio of the exponents; the original coupling constants cancel completely at leading order in slow roll.

What carries the argument

The algebraic distortion equation of motion and its closed-form solution for the distortion tensor (sourced by the scalar gradient). Substituting that solution produces the effective kinetic coupling function K, a rational function of the distortion coupling P and of constants built from the original thirteen couplings.

Load-bearing premise

Higher-order distortion terms and extra covariant derivatives stay negligible throughout slow roll, so the algebraic solution and the large-field limit of the kinetic function are enough to compute the leading observables.

What would settle it

Compute the same observables with controlled higher-order distortion or multi-derivative terms retained; if ns and r shift outside the single-parameter tracks of equations (3.7), (3.11) and (3.17) at leading slow-roll order, the claim that the algebraic truncation is sufficient fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A large class of projectively invariant metric-affine actions with no a-priori scalar kinetic term still produce a dynamical, stable inflaton after distortion is integrated out.
  • For monomial P and V the map from the thirteen coupling constants to (ns, r) collapses to a single number n/p, so many distinct starting actions share identical leading-order predictions.
  • Alpha-attractor and non-minimally coupled monomial models both land on the same one-parameter deformation of the Starobinsky (ns, r) relation and enter current observational contours for small values of that parameter.
  • Torsion or non-metricity can each be made to vanish dynamically by choice of couplings, without imposing that vanishing as a geometric constraint a priori; both cannot vanish at once except in the trivial source-free case.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same algebraic integration could be repeated with a multi-field distortion coupling, potentially generating multi-field kinetic matrices whose eigenvalues and mixing angles are fixed by the same class of constants.
  • Because the large-field limit of K is power-law for monomial P, the end-of-inflation and reheating stages (where the large-field approximation fails) are the most likely place for the dropped constants to re-enter the observables.
  • If future BAO or CMB data prefer higher ns at fixed r, the pure monomial branch (currently outside 2σ) could become competitive without any change to the underlying action class.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a projectively invariant metric-affine action containing the Einstein–Hilbert term (with non-minimal F), a scalar potential V, and all independent quadratic algebraic distortion terms plus linear first-derivative distortion terms, each coupled to a function P(φ) of a scalar field that has no a-priori kinetic term. The distortion equation of motion is algebraic; it is solved with a linear-in-gradient ansatz for torsion and non-metricity, and the solution is substituted back to produce an effective single-field action whose entire kinetic term is generated by the distortion, with kinetic function K determined by the original 13 coupling constants (Eq. 2.17). Inflationary observables are then computed for three classes with monomial P: (i) monomial V yields ns and r that depend only on the exponent ratio n/p (Eq. 3.7) and lie outside Planck+BK18 2σ contours; (ii) an α-attractor potential with p=2 produces a one-parameter deformation of the Starobinsky predictions that approaches the Starobinsky limit; (iii) non-minimal F=1+ξφ^p together with a monomial V satisfying n=2p again yields the same modified-Starobinsky relations.

Significance. If the large-field reduction and the neglect of higher-order terms remain under control, the work supplies a systematic, fully analytic route from a broad class of metric-affine actions to an effective scalar-tensor theory whose kinetic term is sourced entirely by distortion. The explicit demonstration that the 13 starting constants drop out of ns and r for monomial potentials (leaving only the ratio n/p) is a non-trivial robustness result, while the α-attractor and non-minimal cases recover observationally viable, Starobinsky-like predictions controlled by a single free parameter. The complete algebraic expressions for the intermediate constants ci and di collected in the appendices make the derivation reproducible and constitute a useful reference for subsequent metric-affine model building.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eqs. (3.1) and (3.7)] The central claim that ns and r depend only on the ratio n/p, with all 13 starting constants dropping out (Eq. 3.7), rests on replacing the full rational kinetic function (2.17) by its leading large-field piece K≈−2p^{2}k0 φ^{p−2} (Eq. 3.1). Because φ decreases during the 50–60 e-folds that determine the observables, the lower-order polynomials in both numerator and denominator of (2.17) can become comparable near the end of inflation (or earlier for large p or mild hierarchies among the di). When that occurs the canonical redefinition acquires extra φ-dependent factors, the effective potential is no longer a pure power of χ, and residual dependence on the original constants re-enters. The manuscript states the approximation but never quantifies the field range over which it remains accurate to the precision needed for ns and r; such a check (analytic bounds on the di or numerical evalua
  2. [§2.2] The justification for truncating at quadratic algebraic and single-derivative distortion terms (and for ignoring direct curvature–distortion couplings) is that higher-order contributions are slow-roll suppressed once the algebraic solution (2.12) is inserted. For the monomial models the field excursion can be large, especially when n/p is small; a concrete estimate of the size of the neglected operators over the relevant range of φ (or an explicit statement of the parametric conditions under which they remain sub-dominant) is needed to confirm that the leading-order observables are robust.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 1] Figure 1 would be clearer if the colour-scale legend explicitly indicated which parameter (n/p or k0α) is being varied along each curve, and if the Starobinsky point were marked for reference.
  2. [Appendices A–B] The lengthy but complete expressions for the ci and di in Appendices A and B are valuable; a short remark in the main text noting that they reduce to simple values for the “all constants equal to unity” example would help the reader verify the stability conditions (2.18).
  3. [throughout] A few minor typos appear (e.g., “indepenedent”, “ration/p”); a careful proof-reading pass would remove them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: algebraic integration of distortion yields K(φ) by construction, and ns/r follow from standard slow-roll on the resulting effective potential without feeding data or self-defined quantities back into the prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The action (2.6)–(2.8) is written with 13 free constants after projective invariance; the distortion EOM (2.9) is algebraic by the deliberate truncation to quadratic L and single-derivative terms; the ansatz (2.10)–(2.11) is solved for the constants ci (Appendix A) and substituted to produce the effective kinetic function K (2.17) whose di are explicit combinations of the original ai,bi (Appendix B). Large-field monomial reduction (3.1) then maps to a power-law potential in the canonical field, from which the textbook slow-roll formulae immediately give ns and r depending only on the exponent ratio n/p (3.7). No cosmological data are fitted and re-used as predictions; the 13 constants either cancel or remain free overall scales; self-citations (e.g. to prior Palatini/Higgs or Chern-Simons papers by the same group) supply only technical background and are not load-bearing for uniqueness or for the algebraic elimination itself. The large-field approximation’s domain of validity is an ordinary modelling assumption, not a circular reduction of output to input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the algebraic character of the distortion EOM (ensured by truncating at quadratic order and one derivative), projective invariance (used to set a3=0), the gradient ansatz for torsion and non-metricity, the large-field limit of the kinetic function, and the standard slow-roll formulae. The 13 coupling constants are free parameters of the starting action; after integration they collapse into the di that appear in K, and further into a single combination k0 or β for the observables of interest. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • 13 starting coupling constants a_i, b_i (reduced to 13 by projective invariance)
    Parametrize the most general algebraic distortion action; after integration they determine the coefficients d_i of the kinetic function K.
  • P0, p (monomial distortion coupling)
    Chosen by hand for the three model classes; enter the overall scale of K and the field redefinition.
  • n (monomial potential exponent) or α, n (α-attractor)
    Free model parameters that control the shape of V; only the ratio n/p or the product k0 α survives in the observables.
  • ξ (non-minimal Einstein-Hilbert coupling)
    Free parameter of the third model class; appears in the combination β that rescales the modified Starobinsky formulae.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Distortion equation of motion remains algebraic to leading order in slow-roll when only quadratic algebraic and single-derivative linear terms are kept.
    Stated in §2.2; higher-order terms are argued to be slow-roll suppressed but not proven to vanish.
  • domain assumption Projective invariance of the action, used to set a3 → 0.
    Imposed in §2.2 to reduce 14 constants to 13.
  • ad hoc to paper Ansatz that torsion and non-metricity are linear in the gradient of the scalar field (Eqs. 2.10–2.11).
    Introduced to solve the algebraic EOM; justified as the general solution sourced by a scalar gradient but not derived from a uniqueness theorem.
  • domain assumption Large-field limit of the kinetic function for monomial P (Eq. 3.1) and standard slow-roll formulae for ns and r.
    Used throughout §3; end-of-inflation corrections are noted as possible but not computed.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 23662 in / 2851 out tokens · 27091 ms · 2026-07-12T01:31:07.629829+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study inflation in metric-affine gravity. We write an action that contains all the second order algebraic distortion terms, and all first order distortion terms with a single covariant derivative, coupled to a scalar field. We include the Einstein--Hilbert term with nonminimal coupling, a scalar field potential, and impose projective invariance. The distortion equation of motion is algebraic by construction, and the distortion is integrated out analytically. This yields a kinetic term sourced entirely by distortion, with a kinetic coupling function determined by the 13 free coupling constants of the starting action. We compute inflationary observables for three model classes with a monomial distortion coupling. For a monomial potential, the spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio depend only on the ratio of the exponents, with the starting coupling constants dropping out entirely; however, this model lies outside the Planck + BK18 $2\sigma$ contours. For a potential of the $\alpha$-attractor form, the observables are governed by a single parameter and approach the Starobinsky predictions as a limit. Including a nonminimal coupling to the Ricci scalar with a monomial potential can also yield an asymptotically flat effective potential with the same modified Starobinsky observables.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 55 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685

    1979

  2. [2]

    A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99–102

    1980

  3. [3]

    Kazanas,Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Astrophys

    D. Kazanas,Dynamics of the Universe and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking,Astrophys. J. Lett.241 (1980) L59–L63

    1980

  4. [4]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347–356

    1981

  5. [5]

    Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,Mon

    K. Sato,First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.195(1981) 467–479

    1981

  6. [6]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,JETP Lett. 33(1981) 532–535

    1981

  7. [7]

    A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389–393

    1982

  8. [8]

    Albrecht and P

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220–1223

    1982

  9. [9]

    S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss,Supercooled Phase Transitions in the Very Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 35–38

    1982

  10. [10]

    G. V. Chibisov and V. F. Mukhanov,Galaxy formation and phonons,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.200 (1982) 535–550

    1982

  11. [11]

    S. W. Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

    1982

  12. [12]

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110–1113

    1982

  13. [13]

    A. A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175–178

    1982

  14. [14]

    Sasaki,Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,Prog

    M. Sasaki,Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,Prog. Theor. Phys.76 (1986) 1036

    1986

  15. [15]

    V. F. Mukhanov,Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,Sov. Phys. JETP 67(1988) 1297–1302. [16]Planckcollaboration, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A10, [1807.06211]. [17]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astroph...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  16. [16]

    McDonough and E

    E. McDonough and E. G. M. Ferreira,The spectrum ofn s constraints from DESI and CMB data, 2512.05108

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    Weinberg,Effective Field Theory for Inflation,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Effective Field Theory for Inflation,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 123541, [0804.4291]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    A. R. Solomon and M. Trodden,Higher-derivative operators and effective field theory for general scalar-tensor theories,JCAP02(2018) 031, [1709.09695]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    C. G. Callan, S. Coleman and R. Jackiw,A new improved energy-momentum tensor,Annals of Physics 59(1970) 42 – 73

    1970

  20. [20]

    F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton,Phys. Lett. B 659(2008) 703–706, [0710.3755]. – 13 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    Bauer and D

    F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Inflation with Non-Minimal Coupling: Metric versus Palatini Formulations, Phys. Lett. B665(2008) 222–226, [0803.2664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  22. [22]

    Capozziello and G

    S. Capozziello and G. Lambiase,Nonminimal derivative coupling and the recovering of cosmological constant,Gen. Rel. Grav.31(1999) 1005–1014, [gr-qc/9901051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  23. [23]

    Capozziello, G

    S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase and H. J. Schmidt,Nonminimal derivative couplings and inflation in generalized theories of gravity,Annalen Phys.9(2000) 39–48, [gr-qc/9906051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  24. [24]

    S. F. Daniel and R. R. Caldwell,Consequences of a cosmic scalar with kinetic coupling to curvature, Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 5573–5580, [0709.0009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    S. V. Sushkov,Exact cosmological solutions with nonminimal derivative coupling,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 103505, [0910.0980]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  26. [26]

    Germani and A

    C. Germani and A. Kehagias,New Model of Inflation with Non-minimal Derivative Coupling of Standard Model Higgs Boson to Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 011302, [1003.2635]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Germani and A

    C. Germani and A. Kehagias,Cosmological Perturbations in the New Higgs Inflation,JCAP05(2010) 019, [1003.4285]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field, Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 231302, [1008.0603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [29]

    Kamada, T

    K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Higgs G-inflation,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 083515, [1012.4238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Kobayashi, M

    T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations,Prog. Theor. Phys.126(2011) 511–529, [1105.5723]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Germani,Slow Roll Inflation: A Somehow Different Perspective,Rom

    C. Germani,Slow Roll Inflation: A Somehow Different Perspective,Rom. J. Phys.57(2012) 841–848, [1112.1083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [32]

    Tsujikawa,Observational tests of inflation with a field derivative coupling to gravity,Phys

    S. Tsujikawa,Observational tests of inflation with a field derivative coupling to gravity,Phys. Rev. D 85(2012) 083518, [1201.5926]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Kamada, T

    K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, T. Takahashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Generalized Higgs inflation, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 023504, [1203.4059]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Kamada, T

    K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, T. Kunimitsu, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,Graceful exit from HiggsG inflation,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 123518, [1309.7410]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Germani, Y

    C. Germani, Y. Watanabe and N. Wintergerst,Self-unitarization of New Higgs Inflation and compatibility with Planck and BICEP2 data,JCAP12(2014) 009, [1403.5766]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  36. [36]

    N. Yang, Q. Fei, Q. Gao and Y. Gong,Inflationary models with non-minimally derivative coupling, Class. Quant. Grav.33(2016) 205001, [1504.05839]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Kunimitsu, T

    T. Kunimitsu, T. Suyama, Y. Watanabe and J. Yokoyama,Large tensor mode, field range bound and consistency in generalized G-inflation,JCAP08(2015) 044, [1504.06946]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  38. [38]

    Di Vita and C

    S. Di Vita and C. Germani,Electroweak vacuum stability and inflation via nonminimal derivative couplings to gravity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 045005, [1508.04777]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Escriv` a and C

    A. Escriv` a and C. Germani,Beyond dimensional analysis: Higgs and new Higgs inflations do not violate unitarity,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 123526, [1612.06253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  40. [40]

    Fumagalli, S

    J. Fumagalli, S. Mooij and M. Postma,Unitarity and predictiveness in new Higgs inflation,JHEP03 (2018) 038, [1711.08761]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Sato and K.-i

    S. Sato and K.-i. Maeda,Hybrid Higgs Inflation: The Use of Disformal Transformation,Phys. Rev. D 97(2018) 083512, [1712.04237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    C. Fu, P. Wu and H. Yu,Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with Nonminimal Derivative Coupling, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063532, [1907.05042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez,Higgs Inflation with linear and quadratic curvature corrections, 1910.11289

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1910

  44. [44]

    L. N. Granda, D. F. Jimenez and W. Cardona,Higgs inflation with non-minimal derivative coupling to gravity,Astropart. Phys.121(2020) 102459, [1911.02901]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    Sato and K.-i

    S. Sato and K.-i. Maeda,Stability of hybrid Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103520, [2001.00154]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, A. Lykkas and T. D. Pappas,Palatini-Higgs inflation with nonminimal derivative coupling,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 063522, [2008.06371]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Fumagalli, M

    J. Fumagalli, M. Postma and M. Van Den Bout,Matching and running sensitivity in non-renormalizable inflationary models,JHEP09(2020) 114, [2005.05905]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Dioguardi and A

    C. Dioguardi and A. Racioppi,Palatini F(R,X): A new framework for inflationary attractors,Phys. Dark Univ.45(2024) 101509, [2307.02963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    H. B. Nezhad and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Scalar fields with derivative coupling to curvature in the Palatini and the metric formulation,JCAP02(2024) 009, [2307.04618]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Bouzari Nezhad,Degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories in metric-affine gravity,2512.08972

    H. Bouzari Nezhad,Degenerate higher-order scalar-tensor theories in metric-affine gravity,2512.08972

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Bauer and D

    F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Higgs-Palatini Inflation and Unitarity,Phys. Lett.B698(2011) 425–429, [1012.2900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  52. [52]

    Tenkanen,Resurrecting Quadratic Inflation with a non-minimal coupling to gravity,JCAP1712 (2017) 001, [1710.02758]

    T. Tenkanen,Resurrecting Quadratic Inflation with a non-minimal coupling to gravity,JCAP1712 (2017) 001, [1710.02758]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Annala and S

    J. Annala and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Stability of non-degenerate Ricci-type Palatini theories,JCAP04(2023) 014, [2212.09820]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Annala and S

    J. Annala and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Inflation with R (αβ) terms in the Palatini formulation,JCAP09(2021) 032, [2106.12422]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    R¨ as¨ anen and P

    S. R¨ as¨ anen and P. Wahlman,Higgs inflation with loop corrections in the Palatini formulation,JCAP 1711(2017) 047, [1709.07853]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    R¨ as¨ anen,Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation with kinetic terms for the metric,Open J

    S. R¨ as¨ anen,Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation with kinetic terms for the metric,Open J. Astrophys.2(2019) 1, [1811.09514]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    R¨ as¨ anen and Y

    S. R¨ as¨ anen and Y. Verbin,Palatini formulation for gauge theory: implications for slow-roll inflation, Open J. Astrophys.6(2022) 1, [2211.15584]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Racioppi,Quasi-pole inflation in metric-affine gravity,Gen

    A. Racioppi,Quasi-pole inflation in metric-affine gravity,Gen. Rel. Grav.58(2026) 44, [2512.16815]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  59. [59]

    Enckell, K

    V.-M. Enckell, K. Enqvist, S. R¨ as¨ anen and E. Tomberg,Higgs inflation at the hilltop,JCAP1806 (2018) 005, [1802.09299]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  60. [60]

    Tenkanen,Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini inflation,Gen

    T. Tenkanen,Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini inflation,Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020) 33, [2001.10135]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,JCAP07(2013) 002, [1306.5220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    Kallosh, A

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,JHEP11(2013) 198, [1311.0472]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Borunda, B

    M. Borunda, B. Janssen and M. Bastero-Gil,Palatini versus metric formulation in higher curvature gravity,JCAP11(2008) 008, [0804.4440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  64. [64]

    R. Percacci,Towards Metric-Affine Quantum Gravity, in25th Current Problems in Theoretical Physics: Aspects of Nonperturbative QFT, Foundations of Quantum Theory, Quantum Spacetime, 3, 2020, 2003.09486

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, L

    J. Beltr´ an Jim´ enez, L. Heisenberg and T. S. Koivisto,The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity,Universe5 (2019) 173, [1903.06830]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    L˚ angvik, J.-M

    M. L˚ angvik, J.-M. Ojanper¨ a, S. Raatikainen and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Higgs inflation with the Holst and the Nieh–Yan term,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 083514, [2007.12595]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Hassan and S

    A. Hassan and S. R¨ as¨ anen,Inflation with the Chern-Simons term in the Palatini formulation,JCAP 01(2025) 087, [2408.14983]

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Hassan and S

    A. Hassan and S. Rasanen,Inflation with the Gauss-Bonnet term in the Palatini formulation, 2603.17742. – 15 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Bhattacharya, K

    S. Bhattacharya, K. Dutta, M. R. Gangopadhyay and A. Maharana,α-attractor inflation: Models and predictions,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 103530, [2212.13363]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,2512.10613

    L. Balkenhol et al.,Inflation at the End of 2025: Constraints onrandn s Using the Latest CMB and BAO Data,2512.10613. [74]Atacama Cosmology Telescopecollaboration, T. Louis et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods andΛCDM parameters,JCAP11(2025) 062, [2503.14452]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    E. G. M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox and A. Linde,The BAO-CMB Tension and Implications for Inflation,2507.12459

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Whitt,Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter,Phys

    B. Whitt,Fourth Order Gravity as General Relativity Plus Matter,Phys. Lett. B145(1984) 176–178

    1984

  73. [73]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Encyclopædia Inflationaris: Opiparous Edition,Phys. Dark Univ.5-6(2014) 75–235, [1303.3787]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014