Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 49 references

Any closed orientable hypersurface in a contact 5-or-higher manifold can be C0-small isotoped to one that is C2-robustly non-convex.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 00:56 UTC pith:YIWIAI76

load-bearing objection Clean strengthening of Chaidez's earlier non-convexity result: every hypersurface is C0-close to a C2-robustly non-convex one via a local deconvexifying plug built from Li-Turaev unfoldings. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03649 v1 pith:YIWIAI76 submitted 2026-07-04 math.SG math.DS

Convex hypersurfaces and robust heterodimensional dynamics

Julian Chaidez , Michael Huang This is my paper
classification math.SG math.DS MSC 53D1037D3057R17
keywords convex hypersurfacecharacteristic foliationheterodimensional cyclecontact Hamiltonian manifoldrobust non-convexitydeconvexifying plugLiouville set
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In contact manifolds of dimension five and higher, convex hypersurfaces are already known to be dense in the C0 topology. This paper shows that the complementary phenomenon is equally dense: every closed orientable hypersurface can be moved by an arbitrarily small continuous isotopy so that the resulting surface remains non-convex under every sufficiently small C2 perturbation. The authors obtain the result by building a local “deconvexifying plug.” First they prove that hyperbolic basic sets of the characteristic foliation are automatically Liouville, with sign controlled by index; a positive-negative heterodimensional cycle is therefore an immediate convexity obstruction. They then construct, by C0-small ambient deformations, a simple coindex-one cycle of the correct indices, make it non-degenerate, and unfold it into a two-parameter family to which a recent persistence theorem of Li-Turaev applies. The resulting robust cycle sits inside a plug that can be inserted anywhere, converting any hypersurface into a robustly non-convex one. The theorem therefore supplies a strong counterpart to the Honda-Huang-Giroux density theorem and frames the convex/non-convex dichotomy as a Palis-type alternative in contact topology.

Core claim

Any closed orientable hypersurface in a contact manifold of dimension five or greater is isotopic, by an arbitrarily C0-small isotopy, to a hypersurface that is C2-robustly non-convex. The obstruction is a robust positive-negative heterodimensional cycle of indices (n-1,n) in the characteristic foliation; such a cycle can be created and then robustified by a local deconvexifying plug.

What carries the argument

The robust deconvexifying plug: a C0-small ambient deformation of a standard model region that inserts a non-degenerate coindex-one heterodimensional cycle and then unfolds it so that Li-Turaev persistence produces a C1-open set of nearby characteristic foliations still carrying a positive-negative cycle, thereby obstructing convexity.

Load-bearing premise

That the two-parameter family of contact Hamiltonian structures built by successive plug insertions really is a proper unfolding in the sense required by the Li-Turaev persistence theorem.

What would settle it

Exhibit a closed orientable hypersurface in a contact five-manifold that remains convex under every C0-small isotopy, or verify that the constructed two-parameter family fails one of the multiplier-ratio or signed-distance regularity conditions of a proper unfolding.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proves that any closed orientable hypersurface in a contact manifold of dimension five or greater is isotopic, via an arbitrarily C^0-small isotopy, to a C^2-robustly non-convex hypersurface (Theorem 3). The argument proceeds in three steps: (i) hyperbolic basic sets of the characteristic foliation are Liouville, with sign determined by index (Theorem 3.15 / Theorem 10), yielding a heteroclinic obstruction to convexity (Corollary 3.16 / Corollary 11); (ii) simple coindex-one heterodimensional cycles of index (n-1,n) can be created by C^0-small contact Hamiltonian plugs (Theorem 4.1 / Theorem 14); (iii) any such cycle can be made non-degenerate by C^8-small plugs (Theorem 6.16) and then extended to a proper unfolding of characteristic foliations (Theorem 6.21 / Construction 6.23), so that Li-Turaev's theorem produces robust cycles and hence robust non-convexity (Theorem 15). The constructions are local and produce a robust deconvexifying plug.

Significance. If correct, the result is a strong counterpart to the Honda-Huang/Giroux C^0-density of convex hypersurfaces: non-convexity is not merely dense but can be forced robustly by arbitrarily small C^0 isotopies. It resolves a conjecture of the first author and places the convex/non-convex dichotomy squarely inside Bonatti's C^1-generic dynamics program via positive-negative heterodimensional cycles. Strengths include an independent ergodic divergence criterion for Liouville sets (Proposition 3.6, Lemma 3.7), explicit plug constructions that stay inside contact Hamiltonian manifolds, and a careful verification that the constructed 2-parameter family is a proper unfolding (Proposition 6.22 and Lemma 6.24). The work cleanly separates the new contact-geometric input from the external dynamical black box of Li-Turaev.

major comments (1)
  1. No load-bearing technical gaps were found. The application of Li-Turaev (Theorem 5.31) is the only non-local step, but the paper closes it carefully: non-degeneracy Conditions 5.19-5.25 are achieved by C^8-small contact Hamiltonian plugs using contact transversality (Lemmas 6.10, 6.18-6.20) and the contact fact that center multipliers are real (Corollary 6.8); the subsequent 2-parameter family is built so that the splitting function equals the second parameter s while the multiplier ratio varies non-trivially with the first parameter r (Proposition 6.22 + Lemma 6.24). These verifications are local and use only standard contact geometry.
minor comments (7)
  1. Throughout: many words are concatenated without spaces (e.g., 'Weprovethatanyclosedorientablehypersurface', 'arbitrarilyC0-smallisotopy', 'robustdeconvexifyingplug'). This appears to be a systematic typesetting artifact and should be corrected before publication.
  2. Section 1, Definition 17 and Conjecture 18: the terminology 'positive-negative heterodimensional cycle' is introduced cleanly, but a short forward reference to the coindex-one restriction used in the body would help the reader see why higher-coindex examples remain open (Question 19).
  3. Section 3.2, Proposition 3.6 (Div Criterion): the Hahn-Banach separation argument is standard but terse; a one-sentence reminder that the dual of the cohomology is precisely the space of signed invariant measures would improve readability for contact geometers.
  4. Section 4.1, Lemma 4.3 (Orbit Creation): the construction via a Darboux chart and a momentum Hamiltonian is clear, but the size estimate |F+G|<=epsilon is only sketched; an explicit bound in terms of the support of the cutoff would make the C^0-smallness fully quantitative.
  5. Section 5.3, Setup 5.18 and Conditions 5.19-5.25: the non-degeneracy package is long; a short summary table or diagram listing which condition controls which geometric feature (fragile transversality, strong foliations, saddle/focus ratio) would help navigation.
  6. Section 6.4, Construction 6.23: the choice of two disjoint plugging domains U_G and U_H is essential for independence of the return map of C+ and the transition map of Gamma+; a one-line remark that the supports can be chosen arbitrarily small along the orbit and the fragile heteroclinic would make this transparent.
  7. References: the arXiv numbers for Honda-Huang and for the first author's earlier blender paper are given; adding the published versions (if available) would be useful for the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: main theorem follows from independent obstruction, cycle-creation plugs, and explicit proper-unfolding construction applied to external Li-Turaev theorem.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Theorem 10 (basic sets are Liouville, sign by index) is proved from an ergodic divergence criterion (Prop. 3.6 + Lem. 3.7) and orbit-density for hyperbolic basic sets; Corollary 11 (convexity obstruction) follows immediately by the dividing-set splitting of a convex structure. Theorem 14 (local cycle creation) is an explicit plug construction (orbit creation + isotopy-to-identity + contact vector field with cycle). Theorem 15 (fragile-to-robust) reduces to constructing a proper unfolding (Thm 6.21 / Construction 6.23) whose splitting function equals the second parameter and whose multiplier ratio varies non-trivially with the first (Prop. 6.22 + Lem. 6.24), then invoking the external Li-Turaev Theorem B. Non-degeneracy of the coindex-one cycle is obtained by C^8-small contact plugs enforcing Conditions 5.19–5.25 via standard transversality (Lems 6.10, 6.18–6.20) and the contact fact that center multipliers are real (Cor. 6.8). The prior self-citation [14] is only historical (the earlier blender examples are strengthened, not used as a premise). No equation, definition, or fitted quantity reduces the main claim to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper is pure existence mathematics. It imports standard contact and hyperbolic dynamics, plus one deep external theorem of Li-Turaev, and introduces a small number of named local objects (plugs, positive-negative cycles) that are constructed rather than postulated. No free parameters are fitted.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Li-Turaev Theorem B: a proper unfolding of a non-degenerate coindex-one heterodimensional cycle yields robust heterodimensional cycles for generic nearby parameters.
    Invoked as a black box in Section 5 and applied in Section 6 to finish the robustification.
  • standard math Standard facts of contact Hamiltonian manifolds, characteristic foliations, and contactizations (Definitions 2.1–2.18).
    Background language taken from the authors' earlier survey and classical contact geometry.
  • standard math Hyperbolic basic sets of flows admit dense periodic orbit measures and continuous invariant manifolds (Hirsch-Pugh-Shub, Shilnikov et al.).
    Used throughout Sections 3 and 5 for Liouville criteria and non-degeneracy.
  • domain assumption Honda-Huang C^{0}-density of convex hypersurfaces and Giroux's three-dimensional genericity.
    Cited as the density counterpart that the main theorem complements.
invented entities (2)
  • robust deconvexifying plug no independent evidence
    purpose: Local C^{0}-small ambient deformation that inserts a robust positive-negative heterodimensional cycle into any characteristic foliation.
    Constructed in Sections 4 and 6; the central technical device that turns the obstruction into a density statement.
  • positive-negative heterodimensional cycle no independent evidence
    purpose: Heterodimensional cycle whose indices straddle the middle dimension n, thereby obstructing convexity by the Liouville sign dichotomy.
    Defined in Definition 17; the precise dynamical object that the obstruction and the conjecture revolve around.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 49453 in / 2574 out tokens · 26471 ms · 2026-07-12T00:56:01.939486+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We prove that any closed orientable hypersurface in a contact manifold of dimension five or greater is isotopic to a robustly non-convex hypersurface via an arbitrarily $C^0$-small isotopy. This strengthens a recent result of the first author and yields a strong counterpart to the groundbreaking density theorem of Honda-Huang and Giroux. This is proven by combining a new convexity obstruction via heteroclinics and recent advances in robust heterodimensional dynamics due to Li-Turaev to produce a robust deconvexifying plug, which is a local and robust convexity obstruction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03649 by Julian Chaidez, Michael Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A simple heterodimensional cycle consisting of two hyperbolic fixed points of a 3-dimensional diffeomorphisms. Given a hyperbolic invariant set Λ of a singular line field 𝐿 on Σ, any other singular line field 𝐾 sufficiently close to 𝐿 in the 𝐶 1 -topology has a hyperbolic invariant set Λ𝐾 called the continuation of Λ. The continuation is Hausdorff close to Λ, with the same index and conjugate dynamics. Def… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Examples of Liouville and non-Liouville subsets. The first subset, a trivial arc in a topologically trivial characteristic foliation, is both positive and negative Liouville. The second subset, a sink singularity, is a negative Liouville set. The final subset is a more complicated invariant set that is not Liouville. Corollary 11 (Convexity Obstruction). Let 𝐶` and 𝐶´ be basic sets of the characteristic fo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A proper unfolding based at the heterodimensional cycle in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A cartoon of the steps in the proof of Theorem 4.1 depicting: (a) a local model of the unperturbed characteristic foliation; (b) the introduction of a periodic orbit; and (c) the introduction of a heteroclinic cycle along the orbit. Remark 4.2 (Theorem 14). Given an arbitrary hypersurface Σ in a contact manifold p𝑌, 𝜉q and an open set 𝑈 Ă 𝑌 intersecting Σ, we can insert the plug in Theorem 4.1 in a pluggin… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The various invariant manifolds associated to a hyperbolic fixed point 𝑂 with real and simple center-unstable multipliers. We also require the following preliminary setup and notation in order to formuate non￾degeneracy. Here we will use the notation for transition and return maps from Section 2.6. Setup 5.18 (Non-Degeneracy). Fix a singular line field 𝐿 containing a heterodimensional cycle 𝐶 with coindex … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A depiction of the various data fixed in Setup 5.18. Here we only depict the data on the local sections 𝐷` and 𝐷´, and we do not depict the flow itself. . Condition 5.19 (Simple Fragile Heteroclinic). The transition map of the fragile heteroclinic Γ´ satisfies the following transversality properties at the point 𝑃 𝑠 ` . Tr Γ´ ` 𝑊𝑢 p𝑂´q ˘ is tranverse to 𝑊𝑠𝑒p𝑂`q and Tr Γ´ ` 𝑊𝑢𝑒p𝑂´q ˘ is tranverse to 𝑊𝑠 p𝑂`q… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A depiction of data in Setup 5.18 that satisfies the first three non￾degeneracy conditions, Conditions 5.19, 5.20 and 5.21. The center-unstable coordinates 𝑥𝑐𝑢 and the center-stable coordinates 𝑦𝑐𝑠 respectively determine two smooth maps 𝑢𝑐𝑢 and 𝑣𝑐𝑠 on the interval r´1, 1s𝑟 defined by (5.10) 𝑢𝑐𝑢 : r´1, 1s𝑟 Ñ R 𝑏 𝑐𝑢 given by 𝑢𝑐𝑢 “ 𝑥𝑐𝑢 ˝ 𝜓 (5.11) 𝑣𝑐𝑠 : r´1, 1s𝑟 Ñ R 𝑒 𝑐𝑠 given by 𝑣𝑐𝑠 “ 𝑦𝑐𝑠 ˝ Tr Γ` ˝ 𝜓 Here R𝑏 … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    World Scientific, 2000

    RalphAbrahamandStephenSmale.Nongenericityof𝜔-stability.InTheCollectedPapersofStephenSmale: Volume 2, pages 735–738. World Scientific, 2000

    2000

  2. [2]

    Masayuki Asaoka. Stable intersection of cantor sets in higher dimension and robust homoclinic tangency of the largest codimension.Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 375(2):873–908, 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Robust heterodimensional cycles of co-index two via split blending machines.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12412, 2025

    Pablo G Barrientos, Lorenzo J Díaz, Yuri Ki, Cristina Lizana, and Sebastián A Pérez. Robust heterodimensional cycles of co-index two via split blending machines.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.12412, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Symbolic blender-horseshoes and applications.Nonlinearity, 27(12):2805–2839, 2014

    Pablo G Barrientos, Yuri Ki, and Artem Raibekas. Symbolic blender-horseshoes and applications.Nonlinearity, 27(12):2805–2839, 2014

    2014

  5. [5]

    PhD thesis, Universitäts-und Stadtbiblio- thek Köln, 2023

    Tilman Becker.On geodesible vector fields and related geometric structures. PhD thesis, Universitäts-und Stadtbiblio- thek Köln, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Towards a global view of dynamical systems, for thec1-topology.Ergodic Theory, pages 959–993, 2010

    C Bonatti. Towards a global view of dynamical systems, for thec1-topology.Ergodic Theory, pages 959–993, 2010

    2010

  7. [7]

    What is

    Christian Bonatti, Sylvain Crovisier, Lorenzo Diaz, and Amie Wilkinson. What is... a blender?arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02848, 2016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    ChristianBonattiandLorenzoJ.Diaz.Persistentnonhyperbolictransitivediffeomorphisms.AnnalsofMathemat- ics, 143(2):357–396, 1996

    1996

  9. [9]

    Robust heterodimensional cycles and-generic dynamics.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 7(3):469–525, 2008

    Christian Bonatti and Lorenzo J Díaz. Robust heterodimensional cycles and-generic dynamics.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 7(3):469–525, 2008

    2008

  10. [10]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    Christian Bonatti, Lorenzo J Díaz, and Marcelo Viana.Dynamics beyond uniform hyperbolicity: A global geometric and probabilistic perspective, volume 3. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    2004

  11. [11]

    JosephBreen.Morse-smalecharacteristicfoliationsandconvexityincontactmanifolds.ProceedingsoftheAmerican Mathematical Society, 149(9):3977–3989, 2021

    2021

  12. [12]

    Folded symplectic forms in contact topology.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 201:105213, 2024

    Joseph Breen. Folded symplectic forms in contact topology.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 201:105213, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    The giroux correspondence in arbitrary dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02317, 2023

    Joseph Breen, Ko Honda, and Yang Huang. The giroux correspondence in arbitrary dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02317, 2023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Robustly non-convex hypersurfaces in contact manifolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05979, 2024

    Julian Chaidez. Robustly non-convex hypersurfaces in contact manifolds.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.05979, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Conformally symplectic topology from a dynamical viewpoint.Proceedings of the 2026 Georgia International Topology Conference, 2026

    Julian Chaidez. Conformally symplectic topology from a dynamical viewpoint.Proceedings of the 2026 Georgia International Topology Conference, 2026

    2026

  16. [16]

    LJDíaz.Persistenceofcyclesandnonhyperbolicdynamicsatheteroclinicbifurcations.Nonlinearity,8(5):693–713, 1995

    1995

  17. [17]

    LorenzoJDíazandJorgeRocha.Nonconnectedheterodimensionalcycles: bifurcationandstability.Nonlinearity, 5(6):1315–1341, 1992

    1992

  18. [18]

    Convex symplectic manifolds.Several complex variables and complex geometry, pages 135–162, 1991

    Yakov Eliashberg and Mikhael Gromov. Convex symplectic manifolds.Several complex variables and complex geometry, pages 135–162, 1991

    1991

  19. [19]

    Convex surfaces in contact geometry: Class notes

    John Etnyre. Convex surfaces in contact geometry: Class notes

  20. [20]

    On the nonexistence of tight contact structures.Annals of Mathematics, pages 749–766, 2001

    John B Etnyre and Ko Honda. On the nonexistence of tight contact structures.Annals of Mathematics, pages 749–766, 2001

    2001

  21. [21]

    Tight contact structures with no symplectic fillings.Inventiones Mathematicae, 148(3):609, 2002

    John B Etnyre and Ko Honda. Tight contact structures with no symplectic fillings.Inventiones Mathematicae, 148(3):609, 2002

    2002

  22. [22]

    Cabling and transverse simplicity.Annals of mathematics, pages 1305–1333, 2005

    John B Etnyre and Ko Honda. Cabling and transverse simplicity.Annals of mathematics, pages 1305–1333, 2005

    2005

  23. [23]

    Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics

    Todd Fisher and Boris Hasselblatt.Hyperbolic flows. Zurich Lectures in Advanced Mathematics. EMS Publishing House, Berlin, [2019]©2019

    2019

  24. [24]

    Cambridge University Press, 2008

    Hansjörg Geiges.An introduction to contact topology, volume 109. Cambridge University Press, 2008

    2008

  25. [25]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

    Hansjörg Geiges.An introduction to contact topology, volume 109 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

    2008

  26. [26]

    Convexity in contact topology.Comment

    Emmanuel Giroux. Convexity in contact topology.Comment. Math. Helv, 66(4):637–677, 1991

    1991

  27. [27]

    Certain properties of skew products over a horseshoe and a solenoid

    AS Gorodetski and Yulij Sergeevich Ilyashenko. Certain properties of skew products over a horseshoe and a solenoid. InProc. Steklov Inst. Math, volume 231, pages 90–112, 2000. CONVEX HYPERSURFACES AND ROBUST HETERODIMENSIONAL DYNAMICS 47

    2000

  28. [28]

    Partial hyperbolicity and classification: a survey.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 38(2):401–443, 2018

    Andy Hammerlindl and Rafael Potrie. Partial hyperbolicity and classification: a survey.Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems, 38(2):401–443, 2018

    2018

  29. [29]

    Partially hyperbolic dynamics.Publicaçoes Matemáticas do IMPA, 2011

    F Rodriguez Hertz, J Rodriguez Hertz, and Raúl Ures. Partially hyperbolic dynamics.Publicaçoes Matemáticas do IMPA, 2011

    2011

  30. [30]

    Hirsch, C.C

    M.W. Hirsch, C.C. Pugh, and M. Shub.Invariant Manifolds. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006

    2006

  31. [31]

    On the classification of tight contact structures i.arXiv preprint math/9910127, 1999

    Ko Honda. On the classification of tight contact structures i.arXiv preprint math/9910127, 1999

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  32. [32]

    On the classification of tight contact structures ii.Journal of Differential Geometry, 55(1):83–143, 2000

    Ko Honda. On the classification of tight contact structures ii.Journal of Differential Geometry, 55(1):83–143, 2000

    2000

  33. [33]

    Bypass attachments in higher-dimensional contact topology.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09142, 2018

    Ko Honda and Yang Huang. Bypass attachments in higher-dimensional contact topology.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09142, 2018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Convex hypersurface theory in contact topology.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06025, 2019

    Ko Honda and Yang Huang. Convex hypersurface theory in contact topology.arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06025, 2019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  35. [35]

    Convex decomposition theory.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2002(2):55–88, 2002

    Ko Honda, William H Kazez, and Gordana Matić. Convex decomposition theory.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2002(2):55–88, 2002

    2002

  36. [36]

    Tight contact structures on fibred.Journal of Differential Geometry, 64(2):305–358, 2003

    Ko Honda, William H Kazez, and Gordana Matić. Tight contact structures on fibred.Journal of Differential Geometry, 64(2):305–358, 2003

    2003

  37. [37]

    Right-veering diffeomorphisms of compact surfaces with boundary.Inventiones mathematicae, 169(2):427–449, 2007

    Ko Honda, William H Kazez, and Gordana Matić. Right-veering diffeomorphisms of compact surfaces with boundary.Inventiones mathematicae, 169(2):427–449, 2007

    2007

  38. [38]

    Persistence of heterodimensional cycles.Inventiones mathematicae, 236(3):1413–1504, April 2024

    Dongchen Li and Dmitry Turaev. Persistence of heterodimensional cycles.Inventiones mathematicae, 236(3):1413–1504, April 2024

    2024

  39. [39]

    Contributions to the stability conjecture.Topology, 17(4):383–396, 1978

    Ricardo Mañé. Contributions to the stability conjecture.Topology, 17(4):383–396, 1978

    1978

  40. [40]

    McDuff and D

    D. McDuff and D. Salamon.Introduction To Symplectic Topology, 3rd Ed. Oxford University Press, 2017

    2017

  41. [41]

    DusaMcDuff.Applicationsofconvexintegrationtosymplecticandcontactgeometry.Ann.Inst.Fourier(Grenoble), 37(1):107–133, 1987

    1987

  42. [42]

    J.Palis.Aglobalperspectivefornon-conservativedynamics.Ann.Inst.H.PoincaréCAnal.NonLinéaire,22(4):485– 507, 2005

    2005

  43. [43]

    A global view of dynamics and a conjecture on the denseness of finitude of attractors.Astérisque, 261(xiiixiv):335–347, 2000

    Jacob Palis. A global view of dynamics and a conjecture on the denseness of finitude of attractors.Astérisque, 261(xiiixiv):335–347, 2000

    2000

  44. [44]

    Aim problem list in higher dimensional contact topology, 2024

    Workshop Participants. Aim problem list in higher dimensional contact topology, 2024

    2024

  45. [45]

    Methods of qualitative theory in nonlinear dynamics part i, 2001

    Leonid P Shilnikov, Andrey L Shilnikov, Dmitry V Turaev, and Leon O Chua. Methods of qualitative theory in nonlinear dynamics part i, 2001

    2001

  46. [46]

    Topologically transitive diffeomorphisms of t4

    Michael Shub. Topologically transitive diffeomorphisms of t4. InProceedings of the Symposium on Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems: University of Warwick September 1968—August 1969 Summer School, July 15–25, 1969, pages 39–40. Springer, 2006

    1968

  47. [47]

    A 3-dimensional abraham-smale example

    Carl P Simon. A 3-dimensional abraham-smale example. InProc. Amer. Math. Soc, volume 34, pages 629–630, 1972

    1972

  48. [48]

    Differentiable dynamical systems.Bulletin of the American mathematical Society, 73(6):747–817, 1967

    Stephen Smale. Differentiable dynamical systems.Bulletin of the American mathematical Society, 73(6):747–817, 1967

    1967

  49. [49]

    Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds.Inventiones math- ematicae, 36(1):225–255, 1976

    Dennis Sullivan. Cycles for the dynamical study of foliated manifolds and complex manifolds.Inventiones math- ematicae, 36(1):225–255, 1976. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA Email address:julian.chaidez@usc.edu Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA...

    1976