Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 72 references

First-principles study of the electronic structure and optical properties of two-dimensional $\alpha$-graphdiyne

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Monolayer α-graphdiyne is a gapless Dirac semimetal with strongly anisotropic optical response, including an in-plane plasma frequency near 3.21 eV.

desk verdict Solid, routine DFT map of α-GDY optics; Dirac character is known, the anisotropic spectra and plasma numbers are the real addition, but they sit on uncorrected IPA-PBE. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03841 v1 pith:4NBC7GMP submitted 2026-07-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ashkan Shekaari This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 31.15.E−73.22.Pr78.20.Ci78.67.Wj
keywords α-graphdiynedensity-functionaltheoryDiracsemimetalelectronicstructureopticalanisotropyplasmonexcitationstwo-dimensionalcarbon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses density-functional theory to establish that monolayer α-graphdiyne is a gapless Dirac semimetal: its valence and conduction bands meet linearly at the K point with zero gap, much like graphene. Near the Fermi level the electronic states come almost entirely from carbon 2p orbitals. The same calculations show a sharp optical anisotropy. In-plane light sees a strong free-carrier (Drude) response, negative real dielectric function at low energy, and a plasma frequency of about 3.21 eV; out-of-plane light remains weakly polarizable, with a plasma frequency of only 1.06 eV. Absorption, reflectivity, extinction and energy-loss spectra all confirm the same directional contrast. If these results hold, α-graphdiyne supplies a carbon sheet that couples Dirac-like transport to polarization-sensitive optics and plasmons, a combination useful for optoelectronics and nanoelectronics.

What carries the argument

The frequency-dependent dielectric function ε(ω) obtained in the independent-particle approximation from the PBE Kohn–Sham eigenvalues; all optical spectra (absorption, reflectivity, extinction, EELS) and the plasma frequencies are derived from it.

What would settle it

A higher-level calculation (GW+BSE or equivalent) or a measured optical conductivity / EELS spectrum of monolayer α-GDY that shows a finite gap at K or plasma frequencies substantially different from 3.21 eV (in-plane) and 1.06 eV (out-of-plane).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Monolayer α-graphdiyne is a Dirac semimetal (Eg = 0 at K) whose optical dielectric function, absorption, reflectivity and energy-loss spectra are highly anisotropic, with calculated plasma frequencies of approximately 3.21 eV in-plane and 1.06 eV out-of-plane.

Load-bearing premise

The optical spectra rest on the independent-particle approximation applied to ordinary PBE eigenvalues, without quasiparticle or excitonic corrections that can move peak positions and the low-energy Drude weight by hundreds of meV.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a plane-wave DFT (PBE-GGA, Quantum ESPRESSO) study of monolayer α-graphdiyne. After structural relaxation (BFGS + Murnaghan EOS, a ≈ 11.4064 Å), the electronic band structure is shown to be gapless with a linear Dirac crossing of valence and conduction bands at K, supported by a finite total DOS at EF and PDOS dominated by C 2p states. Optical response functions (ε1, ε2, α, R, n, k, EELS) are computed in the independent-particle approximation and exhibit strong in-plane versus out-of-plane anisotropy, including a Drude-like in-plane response and reported plasma frequencies of ≈ 3.21 eV (in-plane) and ≈ 1.06 eV (out-of-plane). The authors conclude that α-GDY is a Dirac semimetal with highly anisotropic optics, of interest for polarization-sensitive optoelectronic and plasmonic applications.

Significance. A unified DFT characterization of structure, Dirac electronic structure, and polarization-resolved optics for α-GDY is useful for the 2D carbon community, where α-GDY is less thoroughly mapped than γ-GDY. The qualitative picture—gapless Dirac crossing at K, 2p-dominated states near EF, and strong in-plane optical response—is internally consistent with standard DFT and of clear materials interest. Strengths include a complete set of optical spectra for both polarizations and an explicit structural optimization with tabulated coordinates. The quantitative plasma frequencies and the strength of the “plasmonic applications” claim, however, rest on uncontrolled IPA/PBE optics, so the advance is primarily a systematic baseline rather than a definitive optical prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V, EELS / Abstract] Section V (EELS subsection) and Abstract: the reported plasma frequencies (≈ 3.21 eV in-plane, ≈ 1.06 eV out-of-plane; text values 3.208 and 1.059 eV) are load-bearing for the plasmonic-application claim, yet the manuscript never states how they are extracted (zero-crossing of ε1, peak of Im[−1/ε], Drude fit, or other). Please define the operational criterion, report the corresponding spectral feature, and show that the value is stable under denser k-meshes and reasonable broadening.
  2. [Section II / Section V] Computational Details and Section V: all optical spectra and plasma frequencies are obtained in the independent-particle approximation from PBE Kohn–Sham eigenvalues, with no GW quasiparticle shifts, local-field effects, or excitonic (BSE) corrections, and with no quantified error bar. For a 2D Dirac system the low-energy Drude weight and Re ε(ω) zeros are known to shift by hundreds of meV under these corrections. Either (i) add a higher-level check (even a limited GW or hybrid-functional dielectric) or (ii) substantially qualify the quantitative plasma frequencies and soften the plasmonic-application language to match the approximation used.
  3. [Section II, Computational Details] Computational Details: optical response of a gapless 2D metal/semimetal is highly sensitive to k-point density, smearing, and the treatment of the intraband (Drude) term. The text states that parameters were “systematically optimized” but does not report the k-mesh used for the dielectric function, the smearing scheme/width for optics, or whether an explicit Drude contribution was added versus relying on finite-smearing interband transitions alone. These details are necessary to reproduce the intense low-energy ε2 peak and the plasma frequencies.
  4. [Section I, Introduction] Introduction and positioning: the claim that “comprehensive first-principles studies of the electronic and optical properties of α-GDY remain relatively scarce” needs a tighter comparison with existing work on α-GDY (and related GDY polymorphs) electronic structure and optics, including the structural/electronic results already cited (e.g., Li et al., RSC Adv. 10, 16709, 2020). Clarify what is new relative to prior DFT band structures and any prior optical calculations so that the novelty of the present unified electronic+optical dataset is explicit.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table I / Section III] Table I lists Cartesian (x, y) coordinates of 14 C atoms but does not state the corresponding lattice vectors or fractional coordinates; adding a0 and the full cell definition would make the structure immediately reusable.
  2. [Section IV.1 / Fig. 2] Figure 2 caption and text call the system both “metallic” and “Dirac semimetallic”; prefer consistent Dirac-semimetal terminology once the linear crossing and EF placement are established.
  3. [Figures 5–11] In-plane optical panels (ε2, α, k, n, R) use very large vertical scales relative to the out-of-plane panels; consider logarithmic insets or dual-axis notes so that weaker interband structure above ~2 eV remains readable.
  4. [Abstract / Section V / Section VI] Abstract and conclusions quote plasma frequencies as 3.21 and 1.06 eV while the EELS text gives 3.208 and 1.059 eV; round consistently and state the rounding convention.
  5. [Section I] Several self-citations to the author’s prior 2D materials (SLSiN, molybdenene, phagraphene, etc.) appear in the introduction; they are fine as context but are not needed for the α-GDY claims—trim if space is tight.
  6. [Throughout] Minor language/typo polish: e.g., “variable-cell optimization based on the Murnaghan equation of state” is repeated; ensure consistent use of ε vs ϵ in figure captions and text; check “˚A” encoding in the compiled PDF.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: standard DFT workflow outputs with only incidental non-load-bearing self-citations to prior 2D-material papers.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is a conventional first-principles DFT pipeline (PBE-GGA plane-wave pseudopotential calculations in Quantum ESPRESSO): structural relaxation via BFGS/Murnaghan, band structure and DOS along high-symmetry paths, and optical spectra (dielectric function, absorption, reflectivity, EELS, plasma frequencies) obtained in the independent-particle approximation from the Kohn–Sham eigenvalues. All reported quantities (Eg = 0 Dirac crossing at K, PDOS dominance of C 2p, in-plane plasma frequency ≈ 3.21 eV, out-of-plane ≈ 1.06 eV) are direct numerical outputs of that workflow; none is defined in terms of another claimed result, fitted to a subset of the same data and then re-labeled a prediction, or forced by a uniqueness theorem. Self-citations appear only in the introduction (author’s earlier works on MoS2, TiC, molybdenene, phagraphene, SLSiN) as examples of the broader 2D-materials literature; they supply no premise, ansatz, or uniqueness claim used in the α-GDY calculations or conclusions. Consequently the central claims remain independent of any circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard DFT + independent-particle optical pipeline. No new physical entities are postulated. Free parameters are the usual numerical cut-offs and the Murnaghan-fitted lattice constant; all are either converged or reported. Domain assumptions (PBE adequacy for Dirac cones, IPA for 2D optics) are the main sources of uncertainty.

free parameters (3)
  • plane-wave kinetic-energy cut-offs = 1088 / 8708 eV
    1088 eV (wavefunctions) and 8708 eV (charge density) chosen after energy-convergence tests; values affect absolute energies and dielectric functions.
  • equilibrium lattice constant from Murnaghan EOS = 11.4064 Å
    Obtained by least-squares fit of nine strained total energies; enters all subsequent electronic and optical calculations.
  • vacuum thickness = >17 Å
    Chosen >17 Å to suppress periodic-image interactions; residual dipole or dielectric artifacts possible for out-of-plane optics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA exchange-correlation functional adequately describes the Dirac-point topology and low-energy bands of α-GDY
    Invoked throughout Sections II–IV; known to underestimate gaps and sometimes distort Dirac cones, yet used without hybrid/GW cross-check.
  • domain assumption Independent-particle approximation (no local fields, no excitons) yields reliable dielectric functions and plasma frequencies for this 2D system
    Stated in Introduction and used for all optical spectra in Section V; standard but uncontrolled for anisotropic 2D metals.
  • domain assumption Scalar-relativistic ultrasoft/ONCV pseudopotentials with 2s2 2p2 valence configuration are transferable for carbon in this bonding environment
    Computational Details; standard practice but not re-validated against all-electron data for α-GDY.
  • domain assumption Methfessel–Paxton smearing and chosen k-mesh converge the metallic DOS and optical integrals
    Computational Details; convergence claimed but mesh densities not tabulated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of First-principles study of the electronic structure and optical properties of two-dimensional $\alpha$-graphdiyne." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4NBC7GMP

@misc{pith2026260703841,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: First-principles study of the electronic structure and optical properties of two-dimensional $\alpha$-graphdiyne},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4NBC7GMP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03841}
}
abstract

The structural, electronic, and optical properties of monolayer $\alpha$-graphdiyne ($\alpha$-GDY) are systematically investigated using density-functional theory within the plane-wave pseudopotential formalism. The electronic band structure reveals a gapless Dirac crossing at the K point, demonstrating the Dirac semimetallic character of the monolayer. The calculated total and orbital-projected density of states show that the electronic states near the Fermi level are dominated by the carbon $2p$ orbitals, while the contribution of the $2s$ orbitals is comparatively weak. The optical response exhibits pronounced polarization dependence. The in-plane dielectric function displays a strong Drude-like response and negative values of the real dielectric function at low photon energies, whereas the out-of-plane component remains positive throughout the investigated energy range. Consistently, the absorption coefficient, extinction coefficient, reflectivity, and electron energy-loss spectra reveal a pronounced optical anisotropy. The calculated plasma frequencies are approximately $3.21$~eV for the in-plane polarization and $1.06$~eV for the out-of-plane polarization, indicating substantially stronger collective electronic excitations within the atomic plane. These findings demonstrate that $\alpha$-GDY combines Dirac-like electronic behavior with highly anisotropic optical properties, highlighting its potential for polarization-sensitive optoelectronic, plasmonic, and nanoelectronic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03841 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Atomic structures of (a) a 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. presents the calculated electronic band structure of α-GDY along the high-symmetry Γ−M−K−Γ path of the first Brillouin zone. The most prominent feature is that the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) intersect exactly at the K point without opening an energy gap, forming a Dirac point. Consequently, the band gap is zero (Eg = 0 eV), indicating the metallic (Dirac semimetallic) nature of the monolayer [58]. In… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Calculated total DOS of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated orbital-projected DOS of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Calculated real part of the dielectric function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Calculated imaginary part of the dielectric function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Calculated absorption coefficient, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: presents the calculated reflectivity spectra, R(ω), of α-GDY for both in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane R( ω ) Energy (eV) (a) 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0 1 …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Calculated extinction coefficient, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: illustrates the calculated refractive index, n(ω), of α-GDY for the in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane n( ω ) Energy (eV) (a) 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.2 1.22 1.24 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Calculated electron energy loss spectra (EELS), Im[ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The most prominent feature is that the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) intersect exactly at the K point without opening an energy gap, forming a Dirac point

    Band structure Figure 2 presents the calculated electronic band structure ofα-GDY along the high-symmetry Γ−M−K−Γ path of the first Brillouin zone. The most prominent feature is that the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) intersect exactly at the K point without opening an energy gap, forming a Dirac point. Consequently, the band gap is zero (E g ...

  2. [2]

    A finite DOS is observed at the Fermi level, indicating that the system possesses a metallic electronic character

    Total density of states (DOS) Figure 3 shows the calculated total DOS ofα-GDY, with the Fermi level set at 0 eV. A finite DOS is observed at the Fermi level, indicating that the system possesses a metallic electronic character. This result is fully consistent with the electronic band structure, where the valence and conduction bands touch at the K point w...

  3. [3]

    Orbital-projected density of states (PDOS) Figure 4 presents the PDOS ofα-GDY for thes, px,p y, andp z orbitals. The results reveal that the electronic structure is dominated by the carbon 2p states, whereas the contribution of the 2sorbitals is comparatively small over the entire energy range. The 2sorbitals exhibit relatively weak and localized peaks in...

  4. [4]

    A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed between the two components over the entire investigated energy range

    Real part of the dielectric function Figure 5 presents the calculated real part of the dielectric function,ε 1(ω), ofα-GDY for the in- plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed between the two components over the entire investigated energy range. The in-plane dielectric response exhibits strong oscillation...

  5. [5]

    A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed between the two polarization directions

    Imaginary part of the dielectric function Figure 6 presents the calculated imaginary part of the dielectric function,ε 2(ω), ofα-GDY for the in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed between the two polarization directions. The in-plane component exhibits an extremely intense peak in the low-energy regi...

    2000

  6. [6]

    A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed throughout the investigated photon-energy range

    Absorption coefficient Figure 7 presents the calculated absorption coefficient,α(ω), ofα-GDY for the in-plane and out- of-plane polarization directions. A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed throughout the investigated photon-energy range. The in-plane absorption coefficient exhibits several intense absorption bands extending from the infrared to th...

  7. [7]

    Reflectivity Figure 8 presents the calculated reflectivity spectra, R(ω), ofα-GDY for both in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane R(ω) Energy (eV) (a) 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rz(ω) Energy (eV) (b) FIG. 8. Calculated reflectiv...

  8. [8]

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane k(ω) Energy (eV) (a) 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 kz(ω) Energy (eV) (b) FIG

    Extinction coefficient Figure 9 presents the calculated extinction coefficient,k(ω), ofα-GDY for the in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane k(ω) Energy (eV) (a) 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 kz(ω) Energy (eV) (b) FIG. 9. Calculated extinction coeff...

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane n(ω) Energy (eV) (a) 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.2 1.22 1.24 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 nz(ω) Energy (eV) (b) FIG

    Refractive index Figure 10 illustrates the calculated refractive index, n(ω), ofα-GDY for the in-plane and out-of-plane polarization directions. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 In−plane n(ω) Energy (eV) (a) 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.1 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.2 1.22 1.24 0 1 ...

  2. [10]

    A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed throughout the investigated photon-energy range

    Electron energy-loss spectra (EELS) Figure 11 illustrates the calculated EELS, Im[−1/ε(ω)], ofα-GDY for both in-plane and out-of- plane polarization directions. A pronounced optical anisotropy is observed throughout the investigated photon-energy range. The in-plane EELS spect...

  3. [11]

    Geim, K.S

    A.K. Geim, K.S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene, Nat. Mater. 6 (2007) 183

    2007

  4. [12]

    Shekaari, M.R

    A. Shekaari, M.R. Abolhassani, Car−Parrinello molecular dynamics study of the melting behaviors ofn-atom (n= 6, 10) graphene quantum dots, Chem. Phys. Lett. 678 (2017) 177

    2017

  5. [13]

    K. Yang, L. Feng, X. Shi, Z. Liu, Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 530

    2013

  6. [14]

    H. Shen, L. Zhang, M. Liu, Z. Zhang, Biomedical applications of graphene, Theranostics 2 (2012) 283

    2012

  7. [15]

    Feng, Z.A

    L.Z. Feng, Z.A. Liu, Graphene in biomedicine: opportunities and challenges, Nanomedicine 6 (2011) 317

    2011

  8. [16]

    Shekaari, M.R

    A. Shekaari, M.R. Abolhassani, First-principles investigation of the thermodynamic properties of two- dimensional MoS2, Chin. J. Phys. 55 (2017) 105

    2017

  9. [17]

    Jafari, A

    M. Jafari, A. Shekaari, N. Delavari, R. Jafari, Thermodynamic properties of TiC nanowire from first principles, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 138 (2019) 1167

    2019

  10. [18]

    Shekaari, M

    A. Shekaari, M. Jafari, Electronic structure of molybdenene from first principles, arXiv:2404.00833v4

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    Shekaari, M

    A. Shekaari, M. Jafari, Thermodynamic properties of phagraphene, Mol. Simul. 48 (2022) 712

    2022

  12. [20]

    Shekaari, M

    A. Shekaari, M. Jafari, Electronic response of phagraphene membranes to excess charge carriers, Solid State Commun. 318 (2020) 113979

    2020

  13. [21]

    Shekaari, M

    A. Shekaari, M. Jafari, Unveiling the first post- graphene member of silicon nitrides: A novel 2D material, Comput. Mater. Sci. 180 (2020) 109693

    2020

  14. [22]

    Shekaari, Electronic structure of SLSiN under charge density modulation, arXiv:2507.15883

    A. Shekaari, Electronic structure of SLSiN under charge density modulation, arXiv:2507.15883

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Zheng, S

    X. Zheng, S. Chen, J. Li, H. Wu, C. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Chen, Y. Gao, F. He, L. Hui, H. Liu, T. Jiu, N. Wang, G. Li, J. Xu, Y. Xue, C. Huang, C. Chen, Y. Guo, T.-B. Lu, D. Wang, L. Mao, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Chi, W. Guo, X.-H. Bu, H. Zhang, L. Dai, Y. Zhao, Y. Li, Two-Dimensi...

    2023

  16. [24]

    Haley, S.C

    M.M. Haley, S.C. Brand, J.J. Pak, Carbon Networks Based on Dehydrobenzoannulenes: Synthesis of Graphdiyne Substructures, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36 (1997) 836

    1997

  17. [25]

    G. Li, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Guo, Y. Li, D. Zhu, Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 3256

    2010

  18. [26]

    X. Gao, H. Liu, D. Wang, J. Zhang, Graphdiyne: synthesis, properties, and applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48 (2019) 908

    2019

  19. [27]

    Y. Fang, Y. Liu, L. Qi, Y. Xue, Y. Li, 2D Graphdiyne: an emerging carbon material, Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 2681

    2022

  20. [28]

    H. Yu, Y. Xue, Y. Li, Graphdiyne and its assembly architectures synthesis functionalization and applications, Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1803101

    2019

  21. [29]

    Y. Kong, J. Li, S. Zeng, C. Yin, L. Tong, J. Zhang, Bridging the gap between reality and ideality of graphdiyne: the advances of synthetic methodology, Chem. 6 (2020) 1933

    2020

  22. [30]

    J. Li, X. Gao, L. Zhu, M.N. Ghazzal, J. Zhang, C.H. Tung, L.Z. Wu, Graphdiyne for crucial gas involved catalytic reactions in energy conversion applications, Energy Environ. Sci. 13 (2020) 1326

    2020

  23. [31]

    Huang, Y

    C. Huang, Y. Li, N. Wang, Y. Xue, Z. Zuo, H. Liu, Y. Li, Progress in research into 2D graphdiyne-based materials, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 7744

    2018

  24. [32]

    H. Li, J.H. Lim, Y. Lv, N. Li, B. Kang, J.Y. Lee, Graphynes and graphdiynes for energy storage and catalytic utilization: theoretical insights into recent advances, Chem. Rev. 123 (2023) 4795

    2023

  25. [33]

    J. Li, L. Zhu, C.-H. Tung, L.-Z. Wu, Engineering graphdiyne for solar photocatalysis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 135 (2023) No. e202301384

    2023

  26. [34]

    X. Fu, X. Zhao, T.B. Lu, M. Yuan, M. Wang, Graphdiyne-based single-atom catalysts with different coordination environments, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 135 (2023) No. e202219242

    2023

  27. [35]

    Z. Zuo, D. Wang, J. Zhang, F. Lu, Y. Li, Synthesis and applications of graphdiyne-based metal-free catalysts, Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1803762

    2019

  28. [36]

    Khan, A.K

    K. Khan, A.K. Tareen, M. Iqbal, Z. Shi, H. Zhang, Z. Guo, Novel emerging graphdiyne based two dimensional materials: synthesis, properties and renewable energy applications, Nano Today 39 (2021) 101207

    2021

  29. [37]

    B. Li, C. Lai, M. Zhang, G. Zeng, S. Liu, D. Huang, L. Qin, X. Liu, H. Yi, F. Xu, N. An, L. Chen, Graphdiyne: A rising star of electrocatalyst support for energy conversion, Adv. Energy Mater. 10 (2020) 2000177

    2020

  30. [38]

    J. Li, C. Wang, B. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Yu, Y. Chen, X. Liu, Z. Guo, H. Zhang, Artificial Carbon Graphdiyne: Status and challenges in nonlinear 13 photonic and optoelectronic applications, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 (2020) 49281

    2020

  31. [39]

    S. Chen, G. Shi, Two-dimensional materials for halide perovskite-based optoelectronic devices, Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1605448

    2017

  32. [40]

    J. Kang, S. Huang, K. Jiang, C. Lu, Z. Chen, J. Zhu, C. Yang, A. Ciesielski, F. Qiu, X. Zhuang, 2D Porous polymers with sp2-carbon connections and sole sp2-carbon skeletons, Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 2000857

    2020

  33. [41]

    J. Liu, C. Chen, Y. Zhao, Progress and prospects of graphdiyne-based materials in biomedical applications, Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1804386

    2019

  34. [42]

    L. Li, W. Qiao, H. Baic, Y. Huang, Structural and electronic properties ofα−,β−,γ−, and 6,6,18- graphdiyne sheets and nanotubes, RSC Adv. 10 (2020) 16709

    2020

  35. [43]

    R.G. Parr, W. Yang, Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford, 1989

    1989

  36. [44]

    Kohanoff, Electronic Structure Calculations for Solids and Molecules: Theory and Computational Methods, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 2006

    J. Kohanoff, Electronic Structure Calculations for Solids and Molecules: Theory and Computational Methods, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, 2006

    2006

  37. [45]

    Martin, Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    R.M. Martin, Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    2004

  38. [46]

    P.Y. Yu, M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors: Physics and Materials Properties, 4th ed., Springer, Berlin, 2010

    2010

  39. [47]

    Kohn, L.J

    W. Kohn, L.J. Sham, Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) A1133

    1965

  40. [48]

    Pickett, Pseudopotential methods in condensed matter applications, Comput

    W.E. Pickett, Pseudopotential methods in condensed matter applications, Comput. Phys. Rep. 9 (1989) 115

    1989

  41. [49]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865

    1996

  42. [50]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G.L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A.D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri...

    2009

  43. [51]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R.A. DiStasio Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Geba...

    2017

  44. [52]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf´ a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino, A. Ferretti, N. Marzari, I. Timrov, A. Urru, S. Baroni, Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale, J. Chem. Phys. 152 (2020) 154105

    2020

  45. [53]

    Vanderbilt, Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism, Phys

    D. Vanderbilt, Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 7892

    1990

  46. [54]

    Laasonen, A

    K. Laasonen, A. Pasquarello, R. Car, C. Lee, D. Vanderbilt, Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics with Vanderbilt ultrasoft pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 47 (1993) 10142

    1993

  47. [55]

    Rappe, K.M

    A.M. Rappe, K.M. Rabe, E. Kaxiras, J.D. Joannopoulos, Optimized pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990) 1227

    1990

  48. [56]

    Louie, S

    S.G. Louie, S. Froyen, M.L. Cohen, Nonlinear ionic pseudopotentials in spin-density-functional calculations, Phys. Rev. B 26 (1982) 1738

    1982

  49. [57]

    Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys

    D.R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 085117

    2013

  50. [58]

    Giannozzi, F

    P. Giannozzi, F. De Angelis, R. Car, First-principle molecular dynamics with ultrasoft pseudopotentials: parallel implementation and application to extended bioinorganic systems, J. Chem. Phys. 120 (2004) 5903

    2004

  51. [59]

    Billeter, A.J

    S.R. Billeter, A.J. Turnera, W. Thiel, Linear scaling geometry optimisation and transition state search in hybrid delocalised internal coordinates, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2 (2000) 2177

    2000

  52. [60]

    Billeter, A

    S.R. Billeter, A. Curioni, W. Andreoni, Efficient linear scaling geometry optimization and transition-state search for direct wavefunction optimization schemes in density functional theory using a plane-wave basis, Comput. Mater. Sci. 27 (2003) 437

    2003

  53. [61]

    Murnaghan, The compressibility of media under extreme pressures, Proc

    F.D. Murnaghan, The compressibility of media under extreme pressures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 30 (1944) 244

    1944

  54. [62]

    Birch, Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals, Phys

    F. Birch, Finite elastic strain of cubic crystals, Phys. Rev. 71 (1947) 809

    1947

  55. [63]

    Hellmann, Einf¨ uhrung in die Quantenchemie, Franz Deuticke, Leipzig, 1937

    H. Hellmann, Einf¨ uhrung in die Quantenchemie, Franz Deuticke, Leipzig, 1937

    1937

  56. [64]

    Feynman, Forces in Molecules, Phys

    R.P. Feynman, Forces in Molecules, Phys. Rev. 56 (1939) 340

    1939

  57. [65]

    Monkhorst, J.D

    H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13 (1976) 5188

    1976

  58. [66]

    Methfessel, A.T

    M. Methfessel, A.T. Paxton, High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B 40 (1989) 3616

    1989

  59. [67]

    Kokalj, XCrySDen–a new program for displaying crystalline structures and electron densities, J

    A. Kokalj, XCrySDen–a new program for displaying crystalline structures and electron densities, J. Mol. Graphics Modelling 17 (1999) 176

    1999

  60. [68]

    Rao, A.K

    C.N.R. Rao, A.K. Sood, K.S. Subrahmanyam, A. Govindaraj, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2010) 7752

    2010

  61. [69]

    Novoselov, A.K

    K.S. Novoselov, A.K. Geim, S.V. Morozov, D. Jiang, M.I. Katsnelson, I.V. Grigorieva, S.V. Dubonos, A.A. Firsov, Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene, Nature 438 (2005) 197

    2005

  62. [70]

    Van Hove, The Occurrence of Singularities in the Elastic Frequency Distribution of a Crystal, Phys

    L. Van Hove, The Occurrence of Singularities in the Elastic Frequency Distribution of a Crystal, Phys. Rev. 89 (1953) 1189

    1953

  63. [71]

    Wehling, A.M

    T.O. Wehling, A.M. Black-Schaffer, A.V. Balatsky, Dirac materials, Adv. Phys. 63 (2014) 1. 14

    2014

  64. [72]

    Dressel, G

    M. Dressel, G. Gr¨ uner, Electrodynamics of Solids: Optical Properties of Electrons in Matter, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.