Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 134 references

Tracing the source of carbon oxides on the large moons of Uranus

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-11 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Carbon oxides on Uranus's large moons are likely native ice shaped by radiation and seasons, not mainly made by radiation.

desk verdict Solid JWST inventory of CO2/CO on the Uranian moons that cleanly favors a dual (native + radiolytic) origin; the formation-pathway premise is the only soft spot and the authors already flag it. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05600 v2 pith:DY3WI3ZO submitted 2026-07-06 astro-ph.EP

Richard J. Cartwright , Sasha Cryan , Rosario Brunetto , Apolline Leclef , Eric Quirico , Bryan J. Holler , William M. Grundy , Tom A. Nordheim
show 10 more authors
Ujjwal Raut Matthew M. Hedman Riley A. DeColibus Chloe B. Beddingfield Marc Neveu Christopher R. Glein Sara Faggi Geronimo L. Villanueva Noemi Pinilla-Alonso Stephanie M. Menten
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords UraniansatellitesJamesWebbSpaceTelescopesurfacecompositionicescarbondioxideicespectroscopyradiolysisvolatiletransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses JWST near-infrared spectra of Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon to settle whether the abundant carbon dioxide (and carbon monoxide) on these moons was made by radiation hitting surface ices or was already present when the moons formed and later exposed. Many of the observed bands match thick crystalline CO2 ice seen only in the laboratory, plus weak signals that may be carbonates and CO2 clathrates that form more readily inside a moon than in a thin regolith. CO2 and CO still concentrate on the trailing sides of the inner moons, so radiation and seasonal frost migration rearrange the material, but the bulk inventory is hard to make that way. Because the same molecule is also found across Uranus's rings, small moons, and irregular satellites, the moons likely accreted carbon oxides from the circum-Uranian disk. The result reframes these moons as places where interior chemistry and volatile cycling leave readable surface records.

What carries the argument

Comparison of JWST/NIRSpec G395M reflectance spectra (especially 12CO2 scattering peaks near 4.15–4.26 µm, multi-lobe 13CO2 bands near 4.35–4.43 µm, and biphonon/triphonon modes near 4.80–5.25 µm) to laboratory thick crystalline CO2 ice, CO2 clathrates, and carbonate spectra, used to distinguish deposit thickness and possible endogenic carriers from pure radiolytic products.

What would settle it

Laboratory radiolysis of carbon-bearing ice mixtures under Uranus-relevant temperatures and fluxes that successfully produce thick crystalline CO2 layers showing the same biphonon/triphonon and multi-lobe 13CO2 features, or spatially resolved maps from a future Uranus orbiter that show no association of CO2 with geologic vents or cold traps independent of magnetospheric exposure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Exposed carbon oxides on Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon are potentially native material accreted from the Uranian subnebula, with surface distributions later shaped by charged-particle irradiation and seasonal sublimation-condensation cycles, rather than being produced mainly by radiolysis of mixed carbon-bearing regolith.

Load-bearing premise

The argument that thick crystalline CO2 deposits and clathrate-like multi-lobe bands are hard to grow by radiolysis of mixed icy regolith is what tips the balance toward a native source; if radiolysis can still build those deposits under Uranian conditions, the dual-origin conclusion weakens.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents JWST/NIRSpec G395M (2.87–5.25 µm) reflectance spectra of the leading and trailing hemispheres of Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. Continuum-divided band and peak measurements, combined with overlays against laboratory spectra (INGMAR CO2 films, a thick monocrystal, CO2:H2O mixtures, clathrates, silicate-hosted CO2, and carbonates), are used to inventory crystalline CO2 features (12CO2 scattering peaks near 4.20/4.25 µm, multi-lobe 13CO2 structure near 4.38–4.41 µm, biphonon/triphonon modes near 4.90/5.17/5.23 µm), CO ice near 4.67 µm, and weaker candidates (4.02 µm carbonates; 4.40 µm 13CO2 clathrates; possible OCN−). Trailing-hemisphere and inner-moon concentration of CO2/CO is confirmed, consistent with prior ground-based CO2-triplet trends. The authors conclude that exposed carbon oxides are potentially native (accreted from the subnebula and/or interior-derived), with surface distributions shaped by charged-particle irradiation and seasonal sublimation–condensation cycles.

Significance. This is the first systematic JWST inventory of carbon-oxide spectral structure across all four large Uranian moons in the 2.9–5.3 µm window, substantially extending ground-based CO2-triplet work and the earlier Ariel-only NIRSpec study. The multi-feature comparison to thick crystalline CO2, clathrate, and carbonate laboratory data, the careful treatment of the unreliable 4.27 µm band, and the system-wide context (rings, ring moons, irregulars) constitute a durable observational contribution. The dual-origin framing is appropriately hedged as “potentially native” and will usefully guide future laboratory experiments and orbiter instrument priorities. Strengths include transparent continuum-division and Monte-Carlo area uncertainties, explicit secure/probable/tentative detection tiers, and direct lab overlays rather than model-only assignments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, §4.3] §3.3 and §4.3: The dual-origin claim that carbon oxides are “potentially native” rests in large part on the premise that multi-lobe 13CO2 structure (4.35–4.43 µm) and biphonon/triphonon modes (4.80–5.25 µm) require thick crystalline deposits that “may be difficult to form via radiolysis of carbon-bearing material mixed in icy regoliths.” The manuscript shows that these features match thick pure-CO2 laboratory spectra, but it does not cite quantitative radiolysis yields, crystallization/grain-growth timescales, or experiments under Uranian T/P/flux conditions that would demonstrate radiolytic CO2 cannot build such deposits. Because this premise is load-bearing for favoring a native component, either add supporting experimental constraints or reframe more explicitly as an open laboratory question (the paper already calls for future work; that call should be tied directly to this premise).
  2. [§3.1, Table 2, §3.3] §3.1, Table 2, and §3.3 (4.02 µm discussion): The 4.02 µm band is listed with interpretation certainty “Favored” for CO3 in carbonate minerals and is used as supporting evidence for interior-derived material. The text, however, notes the absence of the 3.4 µm carbonate complex, residual viability of H2CO3 and a shifted CO2 Christiansen feature, and that none of the CO2-dominated lab spectra reproduce the band. Given that the feature’s radial trend also differs from CO2/CO (strongest on Ariel then Titania, weakest on Umbriel), the “Favored” label overstates the case relative to the paper’s own evidence. Downgrade to “Ambiguous” or add a quantitative argument (band morphology metrics, temperature/mixing tests) that elevates carbonates above the alternatives before using the band as interior-origin support.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figure 4] Figure 4 caption states “3σ uncertainties,” while several plotted points and the text discuss features at >2σ or with 1σ error bars elsewhere. Align caption, plotted error bars, and text consistently.
  2. [§2.1, Tables 3–5] Tables 3–5 report spectral contrast and areas with clear >3σ flags; consider adding a short note in §2.1 on how continuum windows were chosen (and whether alternate windows change any secure/probable classifications), since continuum placement is listed among free parameters.
  3. [§4.2] §4.2 working model of a porous µm-scale CO2 frost veneer over mm-scale compacted ice/clathrate is useful but should be labeled more clearly as a non-unique interpretive sketch; a single sentence noting which observables would falsify it (e.g., future spatially resolved mapping) would help.
  4. [Figure 6, §3.3] Figure 6: the laboratory Christiansen feature near 4.07 µm is marked “X” and discussed as absent in the G395M data; a brief quantitative upper limit on any residual 4.07 µm structure in the moon spectra would strengthen that comparison.
  5. [§4.1] Cross-hemispherical disk-area overlap (~26.7%, mostly >45°N) is well calculated in §4.1; consider stating the assumed limb-darkening or projected-area model more explicitly so the contamination bound can be reproduced.
  6. [Title, Table 2] Minor typographical/formatting issues from the draft (e.g., “T racing” title line, occasional missing spaces in species names, “mag. dipole?” in Table 2) should be cleaned in production.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Observational spectral paper: new JWST features matched to independent laboratory spectra; prior self-cited trends used only for consistency, not as definitional inputs that force the dual-origin conclusion.

  1. self citation load bearing [§4.1 and Fig. 4e; also Abstract and §1]
    "These results are consistent with the hemispherical and radial trends measured in ground-based reflectance data for the CO2 triplet band (shown here in Figure 4e; Grundy et al. 2003, 2006; Cartwright et al. 2015)."

    The paper repeatedly invokes its own prior SpeX/IRTF measurements of the weak 2 µm CO2 triplet to corroborate the new JWST trailing-hemisphere concentration. This is ordinary self-citation of published observations, not a definitional or uniqueness claim that forces the dual-origin conclusion; the new 4.2–5.2 µm features and laboratory matches stand independently. Flagged only as the single minor self-citation instance.

full rationale

The paper is an observational analysis of JWST/NIRSpec reflectance spectra of the Uranian moons, with spectral feature assignments and thickness inferences drawn by direct comparison to external laboratory transmission/reflectance spectra of crystalline CO2 ice, CO2 clathrates, carbonates, and related species (Hansen 1997; Quirico & Schmitt 1997a,b; Bini et al. 1991; Dows & Schettino 1973; Oancea et al. 2012; Nyquist et al. 1997; Suhasaria et al. 2025; etc.). Band-area measurements and trailing/leading ratios are computed from the new data cubes via standard continuum division and trapezoidal integration; no free parameters are fitted to a subset of the present spectra and then re-labeled as predictions of closely related quantities. The dual-origin conclusion (native CO2 accreted or outgassed, with surface distributions later modified by magnetospheric irradiation and seasonal sublimation-condensation) is an interpretive synthesis that explicitly hedges (“potentially native”) and rests on (i) the laboratory requirement that multi-lobe 13CO2 and biphonon/triphonon modes appear only in thick crystalline deposits and (ii) the absence of common radiolytic markers such as H2O2. Prior ground-based CO2-triplet trends (many by overlapping authors) are cited solely for consistency with the new hemispheric and radial patterns; they do not enter the measurement pipeline or define the new spectral features. Self-citations therefore exist but are not load-bearing for the central claim, which remains independently constrained by the JWST data and external laboratory benchmarks. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, uniqueness theorem imported from the authors, or ansatz smuggled via citation is present. Score 1 reflects only the minor, non-circular self-citation of prior observational trends.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The dual-origin claim rests on standard spectroscopic assignments plus two domain assumptions about formation pathways; no free parameters are fitted to force the conclusion, and no new physical entities are invented.

free parameters (2)
  • linear-mixture scaling coefficients for CO2 ice + clathrate
    Arbitrary scale factors (0.075/0.59 for Ariel, 0.026/0.85 for Umbriel) used only for visual comparison in Fig. 8; not used to derive the dual-origin claim.
  • continuum windows for band-area measurements
    Four-to-five-point linear continua chosen by eye; standard practice but still a free choice that affects weak-band areas.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Biphonon/triphonon modes and multi-lobe 13CO2 structure appear only in thick crystalline CO2 ice deposits
    Invoked throughout §3.3 and §4.2 from laboratory literature (Bini et al. 1991; Dows & Schettino 1973; Quirico & Schmitt 1997).
  • domain assumption Radiolysis of mixed carbonaceous material in icy regolith cannot readily produce thick pure crystalline CO2 layers
    Central to the native-origin argument in §4.3; not demonstrated experimentally under Uranian conditions.
  • domain assumption 4.02 µm band morphology matches anhydrous carbonates better than CO2 Christiansen feature or H2CO3
    §3.3 comparison to Nyquist et al. 1997 and Callisto spectra; alternative assignments remain open.
  • standard math Standard vibrational-mode assignments for 12CO2, 13CO2, CO and H2O ice
    Taken from established laboratory optical constants (Hansen 1997; Gerakines & Hudson 2020, etc.).
invented entities (1)
  • two-layer CO2 frost model (porous µm-scale veneer over mm-scale compacted ice/clathrate)
    purpose: Working model offered in §4.2 to reconcile strong scattering peaks with weak overtone modes and H2O-ice depth differences
    Heuristic construct; not required for the dual-origin claim and not independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tracing the source of carbon oxides on the large moons of Uranus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DY3WI3ZO

@misc{pith2026260705600,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tracing the source of carbon oxides on the large moons of Uranus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DY3WI3ZO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05600}
}
read the original abstract

The Uranian moons Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon are enriched in CO2 mixed with CO, but the origin(s) of these carbon oxides, be they primarily native or radiolytic, remains uncertain. Using data collected by NIRSpec on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), we measured the spectral signature of CO2 and other carbon oxides to help disentangle these hypotheses. Through comparison to laboratory data, we find that many of the detected spectral features are consistent with CO2 ice, including 12CO2 scattering peaks (4.15 - 4.26 microns), multi-lobe 13CO2 bands (4.35 - 4.43 microns), and CO2 biphonon and triphonon modes (4.80 - 5.25 microns). Our measurements show that CO2 and CO are concentrated on the trailing hemispheres of the inner moons Ariel and Umbriel, potentially supporting a radiolytic production hypothesis, consistent with prior ground-based results. However, many of the identified spectral features are only observed in thick crystalline ice deposits measured in the laboratory, which may be difficult to form via radiolysis of carbon-bearing material mixed in icy regoliths. Similarly, the data exhibit weak 4.02 microns and 4.40 microns bands, hinting at the presence of carbonate minerals and 13CO2 clathrates, respectively, possibly formed in the interiors of these moons. Furthermore, JWST has revealed that CO2 is widespread at Uranus, present in its system of rings, ring moons, and irregular satellites, consistent with its largest moons accreting CO2 and other carbon oxides from the Uranian subnebula. We conclude that exposed carbon oxides are potentially native, with their surface distributions shaped by charged particle irradiation and seasonal sublimation-condensation cycles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05600 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. NIRSpec IFU (G395M/F290LP) reflectance spectra and 1σ uncertainties for the leading and trailing hemispheres of Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon, normalized to one at 3.59 µm and vertically offset for clarity. The spectra of Ariel, originally reported in Cartwright et al. (2024a), were re-reduced here using an updated version of the calibration pipeline, revealing additional spectral structure between 5.1 and 5.2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. NIRSpec spectra and 1σ uncertainties for Ariel (Ar), Umbriel (Um), Titania (Ti), and Oberon (Ob), normalized to one at 4.30 µm and offset vertically for clarity (trailing hemisphere data in the left column; leading hemisphere data in the right column). The two upper panels show all features with ‘confirmed’ (bolded text) and ‘favored’ compositional interpretations, and the two bottom panels show all features with ‘a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spectral ratios generated by dividing the trailing hemisphere spectrum by the leading hemisphere spectrum for each moon, offset ver￾tically and with uncertainties omit￾ted for clarity. These ratios highlight the notable hemispherical asymme￾tries on Ariel, which become progres￾sively weaker on Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. The ratios also reveal subtle features near 3.01, 4.84, 4.93, and 5.02 µm that are not apparen… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Area measurements and 3σ uncertainties for the (a) 4.20 µm CO2 peak, (b) 4.67 µm CO band, (c) 4.90 µm CO2 band, (d) 5.17 µm CO2 band, (e) the ‘2 µm’ CO2 triplet band (e.g., Grundy et al. 2006), and (f ) the 4.27 µm CO2 band (in some cases, the 3σ uncertainties are smal…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Trailing/leading spectral ratios for Ariel (Ar), Umbriel (Um), Titania (Ti), and Oberon (Ob) compared to a laboratory spectrum of a ∼1 cm thick monocrystal of CO2 ice (187 K) between 3.15 and 3.5 µm, offset vertically for clarity. The central wavelength (µm) of t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: G395M data of Ariel’s trailing hemisphere compared to laboratory reflectance data of a ∼10 µm thick layer of CO2 ice deposited on an irradiated or￾ganic residue and ∼15 µm thick layer of CO2 ice deposited directly onto an Infragold substrate (both warmed up to 90 K), a…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Absorbance spectra (–log(reflectance)) of a thick CO2 ice layer deposited at 50 K and warmed up to 90 K on an organic residue, measured using INGMAR (e.g., H´enault et al. 2025). These laboratory spectra are compared to G395M reflectance data of Ariel trailing and…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top: Absorbance spectra (–log(reflectance)) of CO2 ice (50 K) measured using INGMAR (e.g., H´enault et al. 2025) and CO2 clathrates (110 K) (Oancea et al. 2012). These lab￾oratory spectra are compared to G395M reflectance data of Ariel trailing and Umbriel trailing, co…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Laboratory spectra (modified from Suhasaria et al. 2025) of CO2 ice condensed on a silicate-rich, meteorite sim￾ulant layer (70 K) and amorphous H2O ice (‘ASW’) deposited on a meteorite simulant layer (70 K). These laboratory spectra are compared to G395M reflectance d…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Continuum-divided reflectance data showing 4 µm bands identified in the leading and trailing hemisphere data collected at Ariel and Titania (secure detections; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Areas and approximate 1σ uncertainties for the 4.20 µm, 4.67 µm, 4.90 µm, and 5.17 µm spectral features, measured by JWST/NIRSpec, and the CO2 triplet band, measured by IRTF/SpeX, for the trailing hemispheres of Ariel (Ar), Umbriel (Um), Titania (Ti), and Oberon (Ob),…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2014, Astrophysical Bulletin, 69, 211

    Afanasiev, V., Rosenbush, V., & Kiselev, N. 2014, Astrophysical Bulletin, 69, 211

    2014

  2. [2]

    2018, Icarus, 302, 175

    Aoki, S., Sato, Y., Giuranna, M., et al. 2018, Icarus, 302, 175

    2018

  3. [3]

    M., Roush, T

    Bauer, J. M., Roush, T. L., Geballe, T. R., et al. 2002, Icarus, 158, 178

    2002

  4. [4]

    2024, Space Science Reviews, 220, 49

    Becker, T., Zolotov, M., Gudipati, M., et al. 2024, Space Science Reviews, 220, 49

    2024

  5. [5]

    2015, Icarus, 247, 35

    Beddingfield, C., Burr, D., & Emery, J. 2015, Icarus, 247, 35

    2015

  6. [6]

    B., & Cartwright, R

    Beddingfield, C. B., & Cartwright, R. J. 2021, Icarus, 114583

    2021

  7. [7]

    A., & Patterson, G

    Nordheim, T. A., & Patterson, G. W. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 32

    2025

  8. [8]

    J., & Castillo-Rogez, J

    Cartwright, R. J., & Castillo-Rogez, J. C. 2023, The Planetary Science Journal, 4, 211

    2023

Show all 134 references
  1. [9]

    F., Calvin, W

    Bell, J. F., Calvin, W. M., Ockert-Bell, M. E., et al. 1996, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 101, 9227

    1996

  2. [10]

    2025, in Ice Giant System Seminar Series

    Belyakov, M. 2025, in Ice Giant System Seminar Series

    2025

  3. [11]

    2024, in AAS Division for Planetary Sciences meeting

    Belyakov, M., & Brown, M. 2024, in AAS Division for Planetary Sciences meeting

    2024

  4. [12]

    P., Sandford, S

    Bernstein, M. P., Sandford, S. A., & Allamandola, L. J. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 476, 932

    1997

  5. [13]

    t., & Whalley, E

    Bertie, J. t., & Whalley, E. 1964, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 40, 1637

    1964

  6. [14]

    1991, Physics Letters A, 157, 273

    Bini, R., Salvi, P., Schettino, V., & Jodl, H.-J. 1991, Physics Letters A, 157, 273

    1991

  7. [15]

    2021, Earth and Space Science, 8, e2021EA001844

    Bishop, J., King, S., Lane, M., et al. 2021, Earth and Space Science, 8, e2021EA001844

    2021

  8. [16]

    A., & Vance, S

    Patthoff, D. A., & Vance, S. D. 2023, Icarus, 395, 115452

    2023

  9. [17]

    C., & Landolt, A

    Bohlin, R. C., & Landolt, A. U. 2015, The Astronomical Journal, 149, 122 B¨ oker, T., Beck, T., Birkmann, S., et al. 2023, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 135, 038001

    2015

  10. [18]

    2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 941, 32

    Boogert, A., Brewer, K., Brittain, A., & Emerson, K. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 941, 32

    2022

  11. [19]

    E., Trumbo, S

    Brown, M. E., Trumbo, S. K., Davis, M. R., & Chandra, S. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 229

    2025

  12. [20]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 982, L8

    Brunetto, R., H´ enault, E., Cryan, S., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 982, L8

    2025

  13. [21]

    G., Rocha, W

    Brunken, N. G., Rocha, W. R., Van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 685, A27

    2024

  14. [22]

    J., & Mosher, J

    Buratti, B. J., & Mosher, J. A. 1991, Icarus, 90, 1

    1991

  15. [23]

    Greenfield, P. e. a. . 2023, Zenodo, zenodo.org/records/8067394

    2023

  16. [24]

    M., Johnson, R

    Calvin, W. M., Johnson, R. E., & Spencer, J. R. 1996, Geophysical research letters, 23, 673

    1996

  17. [25]

    1999, Science, 283, 2062

    Carlson, R., Anderson, M., Johnson, R., et al. 1999, Science, 283, 2062

    1999

  18. [26]

    G., De Sanctis, M

    Carrozzo, F. G., De Sanctis, M. C., Raponi, A., et al. 2018, Science Advances, 4, e1701645

    2018

  19. [27]

    2021, Planetary Science Journal, 2, 120

    Cartwright, R., Beddingfield, C., Nordheim, T., et al. 2021, Planetary Science Journal, 2, 120

    2021

  20. [28]

    J., DeColibus, R

    Cartwright, R. J., DeColibus, R. A., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., et al. 2023, The Planetary Science Journal, 4, 42

    2023

  21. [29]

    J., Emery, J

    Cartwright, R. J., Emery, J. P., Pinilla-Alonso, N., et al. 2018, Icarus, 314, 210

    2018

  22. [30]

    J., Emery, J

    Cartwright, R. J., Emery, J. P., Rivkin, A. S., Trilling, D. E., & Pinilla-Alonso, N. 2015, Icarus, 257, 428

    2015

  23. [31]

    J., Nordheim, T

    Cartwright, R. J., Nordheim, T. A., DeColibus, R. A., et al. 2022, The Planetary Science Journal, 3, 8 Carbon oxides on the Uranian moons27

    2022

  24. [32]

    J., Hibbitts, C

    Cartwright, R. J., Hibbitts, C. A., Holler, B. J., et al. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 125

    2025

  25. [33]

    2011, Advances in Space Research, 47, 1633

    Chen, Y.-J., Nuevo, M., Chu, C.-C., et al. 2011, Advances in Space Research, 47, 1633

    2011

  26. [34]

    N., Brown, R

    Clark, R. N., Brown, R. H., Cruikshank, D. P., & Swayze, G. A. 2019, Icarus, 321, 791

    2019

  27. [35]

    N., Curchin, J

    Clark, R. N., Curchin, J. M., Hoefen, T. M., & Swayze, G. A. 2009, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 114

    2009

  28. [36]

    J., Turner, D

    Cohen, I. J., Turner, D. L., Kollmann, P., et al. 2023, Geophysical Research Letters, 50, e2022GL101998

    2023

  29. [37]

    R., Fayolle, E

    Cooke, I. R., Fayolle, E. C., & ¨Oberg, K. I. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 5

    2016

  30. [38]

    P., Roush, T

    Cruikshank, D. P., Roush, T. L., Owen, T. C., et al. 1993, Science, 261, 742

    1993

  31. [39]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 993, 188

    Cryan, S., Brunetto, R., Guilbert-Lepoutre, A., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 993, 188

    2025

  32. [40]

    2011, Icarus, 212, 950

    Dartois, E. 2011, Icarus, 212, 950

    2011

  33. [41]

    2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 514, A49

    Dartois, E., Deboffle, D., & Bouzit, M. 2010, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 514, A49

    2010

  34. [42]

    2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 504, 869 De Pr´ a, M

    Dartois, E., & Schmitt, B. 2009, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 504, 869 De Pr´ a, M. N., H´ enault, E., Pinilla-Alonso, N., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 252 De Sanctis, M. C., Ammannito, E., Raponi, A., et al. 2015, Nature, 528, 241 De Sanctis, M. C., Raponi, A., Ammannito, E...

    2009

  35. [43]

    A., Cartwright, R

    DeColibus, R. A., Cartwright, R. J., Grundy, W. M., et al. 2026, The Planetary Science Journal, 7, 67

    2026

  36. [44]

    A., Chanover, N

    DeColibus, R. A., Chanover, N. J., & Cartwright, R. J. 2022, The Planetary Science Journal, 3, 119 —. 2023, The Planetary Science Journal, 4, 191

    2022

  37. [45]

    2026, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 131, e2025JE009282

    Denton, C., Scully, J., Castillo-Rogez, J., et al. 2026, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 131, e2025JE009282

    2026

  38. [46]

    1986, Chemical physics letters, 126, 38

    DiLella, D., & Tevault, D. 1986, Chemical physics letters, 126, 38

    1986

  39. [47]

    A., & Schettino, V

    Dows, D. A., & Schettino, V. 1973, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 58, 5009

    1973

  40. [48]

    M., Mu˜ noz Caro, G

    Escribano, R. M., Mu˜ noz Caro, G. M., Cruz-Diaz, G. A., Rodr´ ıguez-Lazcano, Y., & Mat´ e, B. 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 12899

    2013

  41. [49]

    E., & Pimentel, G

    Ewing, G. E., & Pimentel, G. C. 1961, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 35, 925

    1961

  42. [50]

    Fink, U., & Sill, G. T. 1982, The infrared spectral properties of frozen volatiles (University of Arizona Press)

    1982

  43. [51]

    2009, Planetary and Space Science, 57, 2053

    Fray, N., & Schmitt, B. 2009, Planetary and Space Science, 57, 2053

    2009

  44. [52]

    2001, Icarus, 154, 372

    Gerakines, P., & Moore, M. 2001, Icarus, 154, 372

    2001

  45. [53]

    H., & Hudson, R

    Gerakines, P., Moore, M. H., & Hudson, R. L. 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 357, 793

    2000

  46. [54]

    A., Bray, J., Davis, A., & Richey, C

    Gerakines, P. A., Bray, J., Davis, A., & Richey, C. 2005, The Astrophysical Journal, 620, 1140

    2005

  47. [55]

    A., & Hudson, R

    Gerakines, P. A., & Hudson, R. L. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 901, 52

    2020

  48. [56]

    A., Materese, C

    Gerakines, P. A., Materese, C. K., & Hudson, R. L. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 522, 3145

    2023

  49. [57]

    A., Yarnall, Y

    Gerakines, P. A., Yarnall, Y. Y., & Hudson, R. L. 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 509, 3515

    2022

  50. [58]

    2023, Accounts of Chemical Research, 56, 2241

    Ghosh, J., Vishwakarma, G., Kumar, R., & Pradeep, T. 2023, Accounts of Chemical Research, 56, 2241

    2023

  51. [59]

    R., & Waite, J

    Glein, C. R., & Waite, J. H. 2020, Geophysical Research Letters, 47, e2019GL085885

    2020

  52. [60]

    2005, Icarus, 177, 570

    Gomis, O., & Strazzulla, G. 2005, Icarus, 177, 570

    2005

  53. [61]

    2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 562, A46

    Alvarez-Candal, A. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 562, A46

    2014

  54. [62]

    J., & Greenberg, J

    Grim, R. J., & Greenberg, J. M. 1987, Astrophysical

    1987

  55. [63]

    321, Oct

    Journal, Part 2-Letters to the Editor (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 321, Oct. 1, 1987, p. L91-L96., 321, L91

    1987

  56. [64]

    2002, Icarus, 155, 486

    Grundy, W., Schmitt, B., & Quirico, E. 2002, Icarus, 155, 486

    2002

  57. [65]

    2006, Icarus, 184, 543

    Grundy, W., Young, L., Spencer, J., et al. 2006, Icarus, 184, 543

    2006

  58. [66]

    2010, Icarus, 205, 594

    Grundy, W., Young, L., Stansberry, J., et al. 2010, Icarus, 205, 594

    2010

  59. [67]

    2003, Icarus, 162, 222

    Grundy, W., Young, L., & Young, E. 2003, Icarus, 162, 222

    2003

  60. [68]

    R., Hallbrucker, A., & Mayer, E

    Hage, W., Liedl, K. R., Hallbrucker, A., & Mayer, E. 1998, Science, 279, 1332

    1998

  61. [69]

    1986, Science, 233, 70

    Hanel, R., Conrath, B., Flasar, F., et al. 1986, Science, 233, 70

    1986

  62. [70]

    Hansen, G. B. 1997, Advances in Space Research, 20, 1613

    1997

  63. [71]

    2012, Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press)

    Hapke, B. 2012, Theory of Reflectance and Emittance Spectroscopy (Cambridge University Press)

    2012

  64. [72]

    2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 129, e2023JE008236

    Hedman, M., Tiscareno, M., Showalter, M., et al. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 129, e2023JE008236

    2024

  65. [73]

    1991, Icarus, 90, 14

    Helfenstein, P., Hillier, J., Weitz, C., & Veverka, J. 1991, Icarus, 90, 14

    1991

  66. [74]

    C., & Veverka, J

    Helfenstein, P., Thomas, P. C., & Veverka, J. 1989, Nature, 338, 324 28Cartwright et al. H´ enault, E., Brunetto, R., Pinilla-Alonso, N., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A126, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452321

    1989 doi

  67. [75]

    R., Filacchione, G., Paranicas, C., Schenk, P., & Scipioni, F

    Hendrix, A. R., Filacchione, G., Paranicas, C., Schenk, P., & Scipioni, F. 2018, Icarus, 300, 103

    2018

  68. [76]

    C., & Pimentel, G

    Herr, K. C., & Pimentel, G. C. 1970, Science, 167, 47

    1970

  69. [77]

    1958, Spectrochimica Acta, 10, 281

    Hexter, R. 1958, Spectrochimica Acta, 10, 281

    1958

  70. [78]

    2002, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 107, 14

    Greeley, R. 2002, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 107, 14

    2002

  71. [79]

    2000, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 105, 22541

    Hibbitts, C., McCord, T., & Hansen, G. 2000, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 105, 22541

    2000

  72. [80]

    2003, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 108

    Hibbitts, C., Pappalardo, R., Hansen, G., & McCord, T. 2003, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 108

    2003

  73. [81]

    2016, Icarus, 267, 255

    Holler, B., Young, L., Grundy, W., & Olkin, C. 2016, Icarus, 267, 255

    2016

  74. [82]

    2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 550, 1140

    Hudson, R., Moore, M., & Gerakines, P. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 550, 1140

    2001

  75. [83]

    E., Milligan, D

    Jacox, M. E., Milligan, D. E., Moll, N. G., & Thompson, W. E. 1965, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 43, 3734

    1965

  76. [84]

    A., et al

    Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., de Oliveira, C. A., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 661, A80

    2022

  77. [85]

    2004, Jupiter: The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere, 485

    Johnson, R., Carlson, R., Cooper, J., et al. 2004, Jupiter: The Planet, Satellites and Magnetosphere, 485

    2004

  78. [86]

    1997, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 480, L79

    Johnson, R., & Jesser, W. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 480, L79

    1997

  79. [87]

    2021, Molecular Physics, 119, e1934581

    Kazakov, K., & Vigasin, A. 2021, Molecular Physics, 119, e1934581

    2021

  80. [88]

    2005, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 435, 587

    Baragiola, R. 2005, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 435, 587

    2005

  81. [89]

    D., Raut, U., Teolis, B

    Mamo, B. D., Raut, U., Teolis, B. D., et al. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 170

    2025

  82. [90]

    2017, Icarus, 294, 201

    Mangan, T., Salzmann, C., Plane, J., & Murray, B. 2017, Icarus, 294, 201

    2017

  83. [91]

    J., et al

    Markwardt, L., Wen Lin, H., Holler, B. J., et al. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 154

    2025

  84. [92]

    2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 701, 1347

    Mastrapa, R., Sandford, S., Roush, T., Cruikshank, D., & Dalle Ore, C. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 701, 1347

    2009

  85. [93]

    K., Rocha, W., Pontoppidan, K., et al

    McClure, M. K., Rocha, W., Pontoppidan, K., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1

    2023

  86. [94]

    a., Carlson, R., Smythe, W., et al

    McCord, T. a., Carlson, R., Smythe, W., et al. 1997, Science, 278, 271

    1997

  87. [95]

    M., Sori, M

    Menten, S. M., Sori, M. M., Bramson, A. M., Nordheim, T. A., & Cartwright, R. J. 2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 129, e2024JE008376

    2024

  88. [96]

    G., Clutter, D

    Moll, N. G., Clutter, D. R., & Thompson, W. E. 1966, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 45, 4469

    1966

  89. [97]

    2007, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 112

    Montmessin, F., Gondet, B., Bibring, J.-P., et al. 2007, Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 112

    2007

  90. [98]

    1991, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, 47, 255

    Moore, M., & Khanna, R. 1991, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy, 47, 255

    1991

  91. [99]

    I., Thomas, C., et al

    Mousis, O., Lunine, J. I., Thomas, C., et al. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 691, 1780 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022

    2009

  92. [100]

    A., Leugers, M

    Nyquist, R. A., Leugers, M. A., & Putzig, C. L. 1997, The handbook of infrared and raman spectra of inorganic compounds and organic salts: a 4-volume set, Acad. Press

    1997

  93. [101]

    2012, Icarus, 221, 900

    Oancea, A., Grasset, O., Le Menn, E., et al. 2012, Icarus, 221, 900

    2012

  94. [102]

    V., Johnson, R

    Oza, A. V., Johnson, R. E., Schmidt, C. A., & Calvin, W. M. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04177

    2025 arXiv

  95. [103]

    1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 513, 294

    Pendleton, Y., Tielens, A., Tokunaga, A., & Bernstein, M. 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 513, 294

    1999

  96. [104]

    2015, Icarus, 250, 116

    Peterson, G., Nimmo, F., & Schenk, P. 2015, Icarus, 250, 116

    2015

  97. [105]

    2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 697, A53

    Potapov, A., Linz, H., Bouwman, J., et al. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 697, A53

    2025

  98. [106]

    2024, Nature Communications, 15

    Protopapa, S., Raut, U., Wong, I., et al. 2024, Nature Communications, 15

    2024

  99. [107]

    1997a, Near-IR optical constants of crystalline CO2 ice at 179K completed with 28K data, doi: https://doi.org/10.26302/SSHADE/ EXPERIMENT BS 20130215 001 —

    Quirico, E., & Schmitt, B. 1997a, Near-IR optical constants of crystalline CO2 ice at 179K completed with 28K data, doi: https://doi.org/10.26302/SSHADE/ EXPERIMENT BS 20130215 001 —. 1997b, Icarus, 127, 354

    doi

  100. [108]

    2003, Chemical Physics, 288, 197

    Aycard, J.-P. 2003, Chemical Physics, 288, 197

    2003

  101. [109]

    Rauscher, B. J. 2023, doi: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03250

    2023 arXiv

  102. [110]

    2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 772, 53

    Raut, U., & Baragiola, R. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 772, 53

    2013

  103. [111]

    2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 752, 159

    Raut, U., Fulvio, D., Loeffler, M., & Baragiola, R. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 752, 159

    2012

  104. [112]

    D., et al

    Raut, U., Peterson, T., Mamo, B. D., et al. 2025, Condensed CO2 on the Uranian Moons: Erosion Timescales from Sublimation, Sputtering, and Implications for Internal Source., Tech. rep., Copernicus Meetings

    2025

  105. [113]

    T., Toomey, D., Onaka, P., et al

    Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D., Onaka, P., et al. 2003, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 362

    2003

  106. [114]

    1988, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol

    Sandford, S., Allamandola, L., Tielens, A., & Valero, G. 1988, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 329, June 1, 1988, p. 498-510., 329, 498

    1988

  107. [115]

    Schenk, P. M. 1991, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 96, 1887

    1991

  108. [116]

    E., Denton, C

    Scully, J. E., Denton, C. A., Castillo-Rogez, J. C., et al. 2025, The Planetary Science Journal, 6, 187 Carbon oxides on the Uranian moons29

    2025

  109. [117]

    N., Rivkin, A

    Sharkey, B. N., Rivkin, A. S., Cartwright, R. J., et al. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16484

    2025 arXiv

  110. [118]

    A., Soderblom, L., Beebe, R., et al

    Smith, B. A., Soderblom, L., Beebe, R., et al. 1986, Science, 233, 43

    1986

  111. [119]

    Landis, M. E. 2017, Icarus, 290, 1

    2017

  112. [120]

    2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Soto, C., Holler, B., & Cartwright, R. 2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 246, 202–01

    2025

  113. [121]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 681, L17

    Souza-Feliciano, A., Holler, B., Pinilla-Alonso, N., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 681, L17

    2024

  114. [122]

    R., & Calvin, W

    Spencer, J. R., & Calvin, W. M. 2002, The Astronomical Journal, 124, 3400

    2002

  115. [123]

    2022, Icarus, 384, 115092

    Prem, P. 2022, Icarus, 384, 115092

    2022

  116. [124]

    2007, Memorie-Societa Astronomica Italiana, 78, 681

    Strazzulla, G., Brucato, J., Palumbo, M., & Spinella, F. 2007, Memorie-Societa Astronomica Italiana, 78, 681

    2007

  117. [125]

    2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, A18

    Sturm, J., McClure, M., Bergner, J., et al. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, A18

    2023

  118. [126]

    2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.00836

    Henning, T. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.00836

    2025 arXiv

  119. [127]

    1997, Introduction to error analysis, the study of uncertainties in physical measurements (MIT Press)

    Taylor, J. 1997, Introduction to error analysis, the study of uncertainties in physical measurements (MIT Press)

    1997

  120. [128]

    2026, Under Review

    Tegler, S., Cartwright, R., Grundy, W., et al. 2026, Under Review

    2026

  121. [129]

    K., & Brown, M

    Trumbo, S. K., & Brown, M. E. 2023, Science, 381, 1308

    2023

  122. [130]

    K., Brown, M

    Trumbo, S. K., Brown, M. E., Bockel´ ee-Morvan, D., et al. 2023, Science Advances, 9, eadg3724 Van Broekhuizen, F., Keane, J., & Schutte, W. 2004, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 415, 425

    2023

  123. [131]

    2023, Science, 381, 1305

    Villanueva, G., Hammel, H., Milam, S., et al. 2023, Science, 381, 1305

    2023

  124. [132]

    M., Jusko, P., et al

    Vyjidak, A., Giuliano, B. M., Jusko, P., et al. 2026, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.03651

    2026

  125. [133]

    1977, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 55, 3429

    Whalley, E. 1977, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 55, 3429

    1977

  126. [134]

    2025, LPI Contributions, 3059, 7047

    Wong, I., Holler, B., Protopapa, S., et al. 2025, LPI Contributions, 3059, 7047

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.