Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 57 references

Anomalous Piezoelectricity from Polarization-Dependent Electrostriction in Wurtzites

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electrostriction in wurtzites is not constant

desk verdict Constant-Q electrostriction breaks down badly in wurtzites; the 354% overestimate headline is qualitatively robust but numerically soft. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05854 v1 pith:VQKLKYCF submitted 2026-07-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Guo-Dong Zhao , Aiden Ross , Yueze Tan , Yujie Zhu , Jia-Mian Hu , Long-Qing Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords piezoelectricityelectrostrictionwurtziteAlNferroelectricsfirst-principleselasticmoduluspolarizationdependence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that in strongly polar wurtzite materials like AlN, the electrostriction coefficient Q and the elastic modulus are strongly dependent on polarization, breaking the conventional assumption that Q is constant. Using first-principles free-energy surfaces, the authors show that the standard relation d = 2QPε₀χ overestimates the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient d₃₃₃ in AlN by more than a factor of three (354%). The physical origin is structural: as polarization increases, the crystal evolves from a layered nonpolar reference toward a tetrahedrally coordinated wurtzite network, which stiffens the lattice and alters the strain-polarization coupling. This makes the piezoelectric response highly nonlinear in polarization and can even produce the anomalous effect that reducing polarization increases the electromechanical strain response. The perovskite PbTiO₃, by contrast, remains much closer to the conventional quadratic picture, with only a 31% error from the constant-Q approximation.

What carries the argument

A reduced one-dimensional free-energy surface f_eff(P₃, ε₃) constructed from DFT, from which local derivatives yield the polarization-dependent electrostriction Q₃₃₃₄(P₃), the strain-polarization factor b₃₃₃(P₃), the clamped-polarization modulus C̃ᴾ₃₃₃₃(P₃), and the piezoelectric coefficient d₃₃₃(P₃) = b₃₃₃ · ε₀χ^σ₃₃. Transverse strains are eliminated under zero transverse stress via Schur-complement reduction.

What would settle it

Measure the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient d₃₃₃ of AlN or related wurtzites as a function of polarization (e.g., through alloying to tune P_s or under applied bias) and check whether it deviates from the linear-in-P scaling predicted by constant-Q. A measurement showing d₃₃₃ ∝ P would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central finding is that the electrostriction coefficient Q₃₃₃₃ and the clamped-polarization elastic modulus C̃ᴾ₃₃₃₃ in wurtzite AlN are strongly polarization-dependent functions rather than constants. The constant-Q approximation, which treats the strain-polarization relation as purely quadratic (ε⁰ ≈ QP²), overestimates d₃₃₃ at the spontaneous polarization P_s by 354%. This breakdown arises because increasing polarization drives a structural transition from a layered hexagonal reference (long axial Al-N separation) to a tetrahedral wurtzite network (short, stiff bonds), causing the elastic modulus to nearly double and the mixed strain-polarization coupling to vary nonlinearly. The same非

Load-bearing premise

The entire analysis is reduced to a one-dimensional polar-distortion path with P₁ = P₂ = 0, assuming that the longitudinal electromechanical response dominates and that transverse coupling is fully captured by eliminating in-plane strains under zero transverse stress. The paper itself notes that a full tensorial extension would require separate low-symmetry constrained-polarization perturbations, so if off-axis polarization responses contribute significantly, the 1D reduction

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript investigates the polarization dependence of electrostriction (Q) and the elastic modulus in strongly polar wurtzites, using AlN as the central example and PbTiO3 as a perovskite reference. The authors construct a two-dimensional DFT free-energy surface f_eff(P3, ε3) and compute local derivatives along the stress-free branch to extract the longitudinal piezoelectric coefficient d333, the strain-polarization factor b333, and the clamped-polarization elastic modulus C^P_3333. The central finding is that the constant-Q approximation (b ≈ 2Q(0)P) breaks down severely in AlN because the structural evolution from a layered nonpolar reference to a tetrahedrally coordinated wurtzite network strongly modifies the electromechanical coupling. This leads to a 354% overestimation of d333(Ps) by the constant-Q model, whereas the DFT-computed value (8 pC/N) agrees well with experiment (~6 pC/N). In contrast, PbTiO3 remains closer to the quadratic approximation, with only a 31% error. The thermodynamic reduction via Schur complement is mathematically clean, and the microscopic structural rationale (Al-N bond network evolution) is physically compelling.

Significance. The paper provides a clear, falsifiable first-principles demonstration that the widely used constant-Q approximation fails for strongly polar wurtzites. The DFT methodology is standard and appropriate (VASP, PBEsol, Berry-phase polarization). The core derivation is parameter-free: d333 is computed directly from derivatives of the DFT free-energy surface, not by fitting Q to target piezoelectric data. The qualitative conclusion is robustly supported by the raw, zeroth-order stress-free strain branch (Fig. 1a), which shows a 121% deviation from the Q(0)P^2 extrapolation without requiring any numerical differentiation. The finding that decreasing polarization can increase the electromechanical strain response is a non-trivial, anomalous prediction with direct design implications for wurtzite ferroelectrics.

major comments (2)
  1. SM §II.B and Table S2: The headline 354% overestimation of d333(Ps) depends on the choice of Q(0) for the constant-Q baseline. Table S2 shows that Q(0) for AlN varies significantly depending on the fitting procedure: 0.137 (global quadratic), 0.237 (local near P=0), and 0.269 (with higher-order terms). The manuscript does not clearly specify which Q(0) value is used for the 354% figure in Fig. 1(c). Since the magnitude of the overestimation is a central quantitative claim, the authors should explicitly state which Q(0) is used and briefly justify that choice. This is a presentation gap that directly affects the interpretation of the headline number.
  2. SM §II.B: The local derivatives defining b333 and d333 are evaluated via local least-squares fits on a grid with a 0.04 fractional step size. No error bars or sensitivity analysis to the fitting window or grid spacing are reported. While the qualitative conclusion does not hinge on these numerical subtleties (as it is already visible in the raw strain data of Fig. 1a), the precision of the specific quantitative claims (e.g., d333(Ps) = 8 pC/N, 354% overestimate, 49% underestimate of C^P_3333) would be strengthened by a brief sensitivity check or an estimate of the numerical uncertainty associated with the local polynomial fits.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figures 1-4: The axis labels and legends contain formatting artifacts (e.g., '/s949', '/s916', '/s102') that appear to be rendering errors. These should be corrected for readability.
  2. Fig. S4: 'Freqeuncy' is misspelled in the axis labels; should be 'Frequency'.
  3. The abstract states the piezoelectric coefficient is a 'third-rank tensor' and electrostriction is a 'fourth-rank tensor'; while standard, these definitions are somewhat pedantic for the abstract and could be streamlined to focus more quickly on the central result.
  4. Introduction: The analogy to Hartree-Fock self-consistent exchange fields (Refs. 16-18) is invoked but not elaborated upon. If this analogy is not used later in the paper, consider removing it to avoid confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. Both major comments identify legitimate presentation gaps that we will address in revision. The first concerns specifying which Q(0) value underlies the headline 354% overestimate; the second concerns adding sensitivity analysis for the local polynomial fits. Both are straightforward to remedy and do not affect the scientific conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: SM §II.B and Table S2: The headline 354% overestimation of d333(Ps) depends on the choice of Q(0) for the constant-Q baseline. Table S2 shows that Q(0) for AlN varies significantly depending on the fitting procedure: 0.137 (global quadratic), 0.237 (local near P=0), and 0.269 (with higher-order terms). The manuscript does not clearly specify which Q(0) value is used for the 354% figure in Fig. 1(c). Since the magnitude of the overestimation is a central quantitative claim, the authors should explicitly state which Q(0) is used and briefly justify that choice.

    Authors: The referee is correct that this is a presentation gap. The 354% figure in Fig. 1(c) uses Q(0) = 0.237 m^4/C^2, the local curvature near P3 = 0 obtained from the stress-free strain branch. This is the natural choice because Q(0) is defined in the manuscript as Q_3333(0), the small-P3 curvature, and the constant-Q extrapolation is meant to represent what one obtains by measuring electrostriction near the reference state and extrapolating linearly. The global quadratic fit (0.137 m^4/C^2) is not a local Q(0) but a single-coefficient fit forced over the entire polarization range, which is a different approximation. We will revise the manuscript and SM to explicitly state which Q(0) is used in Fig. 1(c), add a sentence justifying the choice of the local curvature, and cross-reference Table S2 so the reader can see the range of fitted values and understand that the variation itself reflects the non-quadratic character of the strain-polarization relation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: SM §II.B: The local derivatives defining b333 and d333 are evaluated via local least-squares fits on a grid with a 0.04 fractional step size. No error bars or sensitivity analysis to the fitting window or grid spacing are reported. While the qualitative conclusion does not hinge on these numerical subtleties (as it is already visible in the raw strain data of Fig. 1a), the precision of the specific quantitative claims (e.g., d333(Ps) = 8 pC/N, 354% overestimate, 49% underestimate of C^P_3333) would be strengthened by a brief sensitivity check or an estimate of the numerical uncertainty associated with the local polynomial fits.

    Authors: We agree that a sensitivity analysis would strengthen the quantitative claims and will add one. Specifically, we will vary the fitting window (number of neighboring grid points used in the local least-squares fits) and report the resulting spread in d333(Ps), b333(Ps), and C^P_3333(Ps). We expect the variations to be modest relative to the deviations from the constant-Q baseline, consistent with the referee's own observation that the qualitative conclusion is already visible in the raw strain data of Fig. 1(a). We will add a brief paragraph in SM §II.B summarizing the sensitivity check and quote representative uncertainty ranges for the headline numbers in the main text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the central claim is derived from DFT free-energy surfaces, not from a fitted constant-Q model or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that the electrostriction coefficient Q is strongly polarization-dependent in wurtzites—is derived directly from first-principles DFT free-energy surfaces. The key quantity, Q_3333(P3), is defined as a local curvature (1/2)(d²ε³³/dP²) of the stress-free strain branch extracted from DFT data (Eq. S33), not fitted to the target piezoelectric data. The piezoelectric coefficient d333 is computed from derivatives of the DFT surface via the chain rule (Eq. 3) and Schur-complement reduction (Eqs. S5-S7), using no fitted parameters. The constant-Q model (d ≈ 2QPε₀χ) is used only as a baseline for comparison, not as the derivation of the main result. Self-citations (Refs. 44-46) appear in the context of a general thermodynamic framework for ferroelectrics, but the load-bearing argument here is self-contained: the DFT surface directly yields Q(P), b(P), C^P(P), and d(P) without circular input-output dependency. The 354% overestimate figure compares the DFT-computed d333 against the constant-Q extrapolation, which is a legitimate comparison, not a fitted-then-predicted circularity. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities, particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced. The framework uses standard thermodynamic variables (polarization, strain, electric field) and standard DFT quantities. The 'ferrons' mentioned in Ref. 45 are from a prior paper and not used here. The free parameters Q(0) are extracted from first-principles calculations, not fitted to experimental targets.

free parameters (2)
  • Q(0) for AlN = 0.237 m⁴/C² (local near P=0)
    Small-P curvature of the stress-free strain branch, used as the constant-Q baseline. Extracted from DFT, not fitted to experimental piezoelectric data.
  • Q(0) for PbTiO3 = 0.072 m⁴/C²
    Small-P curvature for the perovskite comparison baseline, from DFT.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The chemo-mechanical free energy can be decomposed as f_CM = g0 + Δg(P) + U_elas(P, ε^el) - E·P + φ(E) (Eq. 1), separating order-parameter, elastic, field, and background contributions.
    Standard proper ferroelectric thermodynamic framework (Ref. 19, Tagantsev Ref. 20). The separation of φ(E) as field-only is a key assumption for identifying the DFT surface with the field-independent part.
  • domain assumption The longitudinal electromechanical response can be captured by a 1D reduced surface f_eff(P3, ε3) with transverse strains eliminated under σ⊥=0.
    Invoked in main text when reducing to the effective free-energy surface. The paper acknowledges this is a reduction and that full tensorial extension requires separate calculations (SM §I.B).
  • standard math The Berry-phase polarization along the polar distortion path serves as the order-parameter polarization P^s.
    King-Smith & Vanderbilt theory (Ref. 29). Standard approach for computing polarization in crystalline solids from DFT.
  • domain assumption The P6₃/mmc layered hexagonal phase is a valid nonpolar reference for AlN.
    The paper shows this phase is dynamically stable (SM §II.D, Fig. S4c), supporting its use as a reference. This is distinct from PbTiO3 where the cubic reference is unstable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous Piezoelectricity from Polarization-Dependent Electrostriction in Wurtzites." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VQKLKYCF

@misc{pith2026260705854,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous Piezoelectricity from Polarization-Dependent Electrostriction in Wurtzites},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VQKLKYCF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05854}
}
abstract

The piezoelectric coefficient is a third-rank tensor connecting the strain or stress with the electric field or polarization, whereas the electrostriction coefficient is a fourth-rank tensor relating the strain to the square of electric polarization. The electrostriction tensor components in the current literature are often treated as constants independent of polarization, resulting in piezoelectric tensor components that are linearly proportional to polarization and the dielectric susceptibility tensor. Here, we study the electrostriction and piezoelectricity in strongly polar wurtzites, including AlN, Al$_{1-x}$Sc$_x$N, Al$_{1-x}$B$_x$N, GaN, and ZnO. We discover that electrostriction and the elastic modulus in wurtzites are both strongly polarization-dependent, and the piezoelectric coefficient is highly nonlinear with respect to polarization, including the anomalous possibility that decreasing polarization increases the electromechanical strain response. These unusual dependencies of electrostriction and piezoelectric effects on polarization arise from the evolution of a layered reference nonpolar structure toward a tetrahedrally coordinated wurtzite network structure as the polarization increases. The findings have important implications in understanding the thermodynamics of the general class of wurtzite ferroelectrics and in manipulating their piezoelectric and ferroelectric behaviors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05854 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Polarization-dependent electromechanical response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Decomposition and structural origin of polarization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Polarization-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Here ˜a 333 ≡ −∂ 2feff/(∂ε33∂P3) is the mixed strain-polarization coupling of the reduced sur- face

    After eliminating the trans- verse strains under zero transverse stress, the reduced longitudinal stress variation is dσ33 = ˜C P 3333 dε33 −˜a333 dP3.(4) Imposing dσ33 = 0 gives b333 ≡ ∂ε0 33 ∂P3 σ =S P 3333˜a333 (5) whereS P 3333 ≡( ˜C P 3333)−1 is the reduced longitudinal compliance. Here ˜a 333 ≡ −∂ 2feff/(∂ε33∂P3) is the mixed strain-polarization cou...

    work page

  2. [2]

    F. Li, B. Wang, X. Gao, D. Damjanovic, L.-Q. Chen, and S. Zhang, Ferroelectric materials toward next-generation electromechanical technologies, Science389, eadn4926 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Fichtner, N

    S. Fichtner, N. Wolff, F. Lofink, L. Kienle, and B. Wag- ner, AlScN: A III-V semiconductor based ferroelectric, J. Appl. Phys.125, 114103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    K.-H. Kim, I. Karpov, R. H. Olsson, and D. Jariwala, Wurtzite and fluorite ferroelectric materials for electronic memory, Nat. Nanotechnol.18, 422 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Casamento, S

    J. Casamento, S. M. Baksa, D. Behrendt, S. Calderon, D. Goodling, J. Hayden, F. He, L. Jacques, S. H. Lee, W. Smith, A. Suceava, Q. Tran, X. Zheng, R. Zu, T. Beechem, I. Dabo, E. C. Dickey, G. Esteves, V. Gopalan, M. D. Henry, J. F. Ihlefeld, T. N. Jackson, S. V. Kalinin, K. P. Kelley, Y. Liu, A. M. Rappe, J. Red- wing, S. Trolier-McKinstry, and J.-P. Mar...

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Zhang, Q

    Y. Zhang, Q. Zhu, B. Tian, and C. Duan, New-generation ferroelectric alscn materials, Nano-Micro Letters16, 227 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    C. H. Skidmore, R. J. Spurling, J. Hayden, S. M. Baksa, D. Behrendt, D. Goodling, J. L. Nordlander, A. Suceava, J. Casamento, B. Akkopru-Akgun, S. Calderon, I. Dabo, V. Gopalan, K. P. Kelley, A. M. Rappe, S. Trolier- McKinstry, E. C. Dickey, and J.-P. Maria, Proximity ferroelectricity in wurtzite heterostructures, Nature637, 574 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    D. Wang, D. Wang, M. Molla, Y. Liu, S. Yang, S. Yuan, J. Liu, M. Hu, Y. Wu, T. Ma, K. Sun, H. Guo, E. Kioupakis, and Z. Mi, Electric-field-induced domain walls in wurtzite ferroelectrics, Nature641, 76 (2025)

    work page 2025

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    C.-W. Lee, N. U. Din, K. Yazawa, G. L. Brennecka, A. Zakutayev, and P. Gorai, Emerging materials and de- sign principles for wurtzite-type ferroelectrics, Matter7, 1644 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Mercado Tejerina, P

    A. Mercado Tejerina, P. Chen, K. Yazawa, A. Zakutayev, L. Bellaiche, and C. Paillard, Systematic comparison of approximations and functionals in first-principle calcula- tions of aluminum-based iii-v ferroelectric nitrides, arXiv , 2605.24334 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Sundar and R

    V. Sundar and R. E. Newnham, Electrostriction and po- larization, Ferroelectrics135, 431 (1992)

    1992

  4. [12]

    R. E. Newnham, V. Sundar, R. Yimnirun, J. Su, and Q. M. Zhang, Electrostriction: Nonlinear electromechan- ical coupling in solid dielectrics, J. Phys. Chem. B101, 10141 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    F. Li, L. Jin, Z. Xu, and S. Zhang, Electrostrictive ef- fect in ferroelectrics: An alternative approach to improve piezoelectricity, Appl. Phys. Rev.1, 011103 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    D. S. Park, M. Hadad, L. M. Riemer, R. Ignatans, D. Spirito, V. Esposito, V. Tileli, N. Gauquelin, D. Chezganov, D. Jannis, J. Verbeeck, S. Gorfman, N. Pryds, P. Muralt, and D. Damjanovic, Induced giant piezoelectricity in centrosymmetric oxides, Science375, 653 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Li, Breaking symmetry for piezoelectricity, Science 375, 618 (2022)

    F. Li, Breaking symmetry for piezoelectricity, Science 375, 618 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    Y. Yan, L. D. Geng, H. Liu, H. Leng, X. Li, Y. U. Wang, and S. Priya, Near-ideal electromechanical coupling in textured piezoelectric ceramics, Nat. Commun.13, 3565 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Auerbach,Interacting electrons and quantum mag- netism(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    A. Auerbach,Interacting electrons and quantum mag- netism(Springer Science & Business Media, 2012). 5

    2012

  10. [18]

    F. Yang, L. Wang, and M. W. Wu, Hole spin relaxation in bilayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. B92, 155414 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Yang and M

    F. Yang and M. W. Wu, Spin diffusion inp-type bilayer WSe2, Phys. Rev. B93, 235433 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Chen, Phase-field method of phase transi- tions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: A re- view, J

    L.-Q. Chen, Phase-field method of phase transi- tions/domain structures in ferroelectric thin films: A re- view, J. Am. Ceram. Soc.91, 1835 (2008)

    2008

  13. [22]

    Supplementary materials include (1) the reduced thermo- dynamic framework and mechanical/electrical boundary conditions; (2) first-principles computational details; and (3) additional derivations for the landau-type interpreta- tion of polarization-dependent electrostriction

  14. [23]

    C. E. Dreyer, A. Janotti, C. G. Van de Walle, and D. Van- derbilt, Correct implementation of polarization constants in wurtzite materials and impact on III-nitrides, Phys. Rev. X6, 021038 (2016)

    2016

  15. [24]

    Tsipas, S

    P. Tsipas, S. Kassavetis, D. Tsoutsou, E. Xenogiannopoulou, E. Golias, S. A. Giamini, C. Grazianetti, D. Chiappe, A. Molle, M. Fanciulli, and A. Dimoulas, Evidence for graphite-like hexagonal aln nanosheets epitaxially grown on single crystal ag(111), Appl. Phys. Lett.103, 251...

    2013

  16. [25]

    H. Ye, P. Wang, R. Wang, J. Wang, X. Xu, R. Feng, T. Wang, W.-Y. Tong, F. Liu, B. Sheng, W. Ma, B. An, H. Li, Z. Chen, C.-G. Duan, W. Ge, B. Shen, and X. Wang, Experimental determination of giant polariza- tion in wurtzite III-nitride semiconductors, Nat. Com- mun.16, 3863 (2025)

    2025

  17. [26]

    Cai and N

    J. Cai and N. Chen, Microscopic mechanism of the wurtzite-to-rocksalt phase transition of the group-III ni- trides from first principles, Phys. Rev. B75, 134109 (2007)

    2007

  18. [27]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comp. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  19. [30]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  20. [31]

    Akiyama, T

    M. Akiyama, T. Kamohara, K. Kano, A. Teshigahara, Y. Takeuchi, and N. Kawahara, Enhancement of piezo- electric response in scandium aluminum nitride alloy thin films prepared by dual reactive cosputtering, Adv. Mater. 21, 593 (2009)

    2009

  21. [32]

    T. Kim, J. Kim, R. Dalmau, R. Schlesser, E. Preble, and X. Jiang, High-temperature electromechanical char- acterization of aln single crystals, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control62, 1880 (2015)

    2015

  22. [33]

    A. I. Khan, K. Chatterjee, B. Wang, S. Drapcho, L. You, C. Serrao, S. R. Bakaul, R. Ramesh, and S. Salahuddin, Negative capacitance in a ferroelectric capacitor, Nat. Mater.14, 182 (2014)

    2014

  23. [34]

    Zubko, J

    P. Zubko, J. C. Wojdel, M. Hadjimichael, S. Fernandez- Pena, A. Sene, I. Luk’yanchuk, J. M. Triscone, and J. Iniguez, Negative capacitance in multidomain ferro- electric superlattices, Nature534, 524 (2016)

    2016

  24. [35]

    Yadav, K

    A. Yadav, K. Nguyen, Z. Hong, P. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, P. Aguado-Puente, C. Nelson, S. Das, B. Prasad, D. Kwon, S. Cheema, A. Khan, C. hu, J. ´I˜ niguez, J. Junquera, L.-Q. Chen, D. Muller, R. Ramesh, and S. Salahuddin, Spatially resolved steady-state nega- tive capacitance, N...

    2019 doi

  25. [36]

    ´I˜ niguez, P

    J. ´I˜ niguez, P. Zubko, I. Luk’yanchuk, and A. Cano, Fer- roelectric negative capacitance, Nat. Rev. Mater.4, 243 (2019)

    2019

  26. [37]

    W. G. Cady,Piezoelectricity: an introduction to the the- ory and applications of electromechanical phenomena in crystals(McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1946)

    1946

  27. [38]

    J. F. Haskins and J. S. Hickman, A derivation and tab- ulation of the piezoelectric equations of state, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.22, 584 (1950)

    1950

  28. [39]

    Bechmann, The linear piezoelectric equations of state, Br

    R. Bechmann, The linear piezoelectric equations of state, Br. J. Appl. Phys.4, 210 (1953)

    1953

  29. [40]

    Y. Hao, D. K. Khatua, D. Wang, J. Gao, S. Ren, Y. Yang, M. Fang, D. Xue, J. Xu, G. Wang, X. Ke, Z. Xu, C. Liu, Q. Fan, Y. Ji, L. Zhang, S. Yang, G. Wang, and X. Ren, Gigantic piezoelectricity in a polycrystalline ceramic ac- tively maintained at a quadruple point, Science391, ...

    2026

  30. [41]

    Budimir, D

    M. Budimir, D. Damjanovic, and N. Setter, Large en- hancement of the piezoelectric response in perovskite crystals by electric bias field antiparallel to polarization, Appl. Phys. Lett.85, 2890 (2004)

    2004

  31. [42]

    Budimir, D

    M. Budimir, D. Damjanovic, and N. Setter, Piezoelec- tric response and free-energy instability in the perovskite crystals BaTiO 3, PbTiO3, and Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3, Phys. Rev. B73, 174106 (2006)

    2006

  32. [43]

    Bacaksiz, H

    C. Bacaksiz, H. Sahin, H. D. Ozaydin, S. Horzum, R. T. Senger, and F. M. Peeters, Hexagonal AlN: Dimensional- crossover-driven band-gap transition, Phys. Rev. B91, 085430 (2015)

    2015

  33. [44]

    M. J. Haun, E. Furman, S. J. Jang, H. A. McKinstry, and L. E. Cross, Thermodynamic theory of PbTiO 3, J. Appl. Phys.62, 3331 (1987)

    1987

  34. [45]

    Yang and L

    F. Yang and L. Q. Chen, A self-consistent computa- tional framework for displacive ferroelectrics from the condensed ground state, arXiv , 2412.04308 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  35. [46]

    G. D. Zhao, F. Yang, and L. Q. Chen, Role of ferrons in the heat capacity and thermal transport of displacive ferroelectrics, Phys. Rev. B112, 014115 (2025)

    2025

  36. [47]

    Yang and L

    F. Yang and L. Chen, Ferroelectric Order and Enhanced Interfacial Superconductivity in Lightly-Doped Quantum Paraelectric KTa1−xNbxO3, arXiv:2511.08253 (2025)

    2025

  37. [48]

    A. G. Kalinichev, J. D. Bass, B. N. Sun, and D. A. Payne, Elastic properties of tetragonal pbtio3 single crystals by brillouin scattering, J. Mater. Res.12, 2623 (1997)

    1997

  38. [49]

    V. G. Gavrilyachenko and E. G. Fesenko, Piezoelectric effect in lead titanate single crystals, Sov. Phys. Crystal- logr. (English Transl.)16, 549 (1971)

    1971

  39. [50]

    Adachi, Y

    M. Adachi, Y. Akishige, T. Asahi, K. Deguchi, K. Gesi, K. Hasebe, T. Hikita, T. Ikeda, Y. Iwata, M. Komukae, T. Mitsui, E. Nakamura, N. Nakatani, M. Okuyama, T. Osaka, A. Sakai, E. Sawaguchi, Y. Shiozaki, T. Tak- enaka, K. Toyoda, T. Tsukamoto, and T. Yagi, PbTiO 3 [F], 1A-11:...

    2001

  40. [51]

    M. A. Carpenter, E. K. Salje, and A. Graeme-Barber, 6 Spontaneous strain as a determinant of thermodynamic properties for phase transitions in minerals, Eur. J. Min- eral.10, 621 (1998)

    1998

  41. [52]

    Kanouni, F

    F. Kanouni, F. Laidoudi, and F. Arab, Density functional theory insights of phonons modes behaviours in alscn for surface acoustic wave applications, Mater. Today Com- mun.36, 106753 (2023)

    2023

  42. [53]

    Anomalous Piezoelectricity from Polarization-Dependent Electrostriction in Wurtzites

    F. Tasn´ adi, B. Alling, C. H¨ oglund, G. Wingqvist, J. Birch, L. Hultman, and I. A. Abrikosov, Origin of the anomalous piezoelectric response in wurtzite Sc xAl1−xN alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 137601 (2010). Supplementary Material for “Anomalous Piezoelectricity from Polariz...

    2010

  43. [54]

    This explicitly shows why the transverse mechanical response must be eliminated under theσ ⊥ = 0 before defining the reduced one-dimensional coefficientsb 333, ˜C P 3333, and ˜a333 used in the main text. II. FIRST-PRINCIPLES COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS AND VALIDATION A. Density func...

  44. [55]

    R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson,Matrix analysis(Cambridge university press, 2012)

    2012

  45. [56]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane- wave basis set, Comp. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  46. [57]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  47. [58]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the density-gradient expansion for exchange in solids and surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

  48. [59]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polarization of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  49. [60]

    A. K. Tagantsev, The role of the background dielectric susceptibility in uniaxial ferroelectrics, Ferroelectrics69, 321 (1986)

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.