Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 31 references

Orientation-resolved ultrafast spin reorientation dynamics in ferrimagnetic DyCo$_5$

T0 review · 3 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Femtosecond laser pulses drive a transient spin reorientation in ferrimagnetic DyCo5, canting magnetization from out-of-plane toward in-plane

desk verdict Solid experimental paper that shows laser-driven canting in DyCo5 with dual-geometry EUV MOKE; the geometric-SRT reading is plausible but not fully locked down without Dy-edge or stronger |M| controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05946 v1 pith:ESEAZGIN submitted 2026-07-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Johanna Richter , Martin Hennecke , Martin Schmidbauer , Ilie Radu , Clemens von Korff Schmising , Stefan Eisebitt This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.78.Jp75.50.Gg78.20.Ls75.30.Gw
keywords spinreorientationDyCo5ultrafastmagnetismferrimagnetEUV-MOKEfemtosecondlasermagneticanisotropyCoM-edge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ferrimagnetic DyCo5 thin films are known to undergo a quasi-static spin-reorientation transition when heated: the equilibrium magnetization flips from out-of-plane to in-plane because the Dy 4f and Co 3d sublattices have competing anisotropies. This paper asks whether a femtosecond laser pulse can trigger an analogous reorientation on ultrafast timescales. By combining polar and transverse extreme-ultraviolet magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements at the Co M3,2 resonance, the authors track both the out-of-plane and in-plane components of the magnetization vector after optical excitation. They report a clear transient canting of the magnetization toward the plane, with characteristic timescales that can be resolved by the dual-geometry measurement, and they cross-check the response with visible-light MOKE. If the interpretation holds, ultrafast optical control of spin orientation becomes available in a material whose equilibrium reorientation is already well mapped, opening a route from thermal spin reorientation to light-driven, time-resolved spin control.

What carries the argument

Combined polar and transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) at the Co M3,2 resonance in the extreme ultraviolet: polar geometry reports the out-of-plane magnetization component, transverse geometry reports the in-plane component, so their joint time dependence maps the geometric canting of the magnetization vector after laser excitation.

What would settle it

A control experiment or analysis showing that the transverse MOKE rise vanishes (or fails to track a consistent canting angle) under conditions that suppress genuine spin reorientation while leaving ordinary ultrafast demagnetization intact—for example, above the quasi-static SRT temperature, in a composition without competing anisotropies, or when the in-plane component inferred from EUV-MOKE is inconsistent with independent magnetometry or XMCD.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Femtosecond laser excitation of ferrimagnetic DyCo5 triggers a transient spin-reorientation process in which the magnetization vector cants from an out-of-plane toward an in-plane orientation; combining polar and transverse EUV-MOKE at the Co M3,2 edge resolves both components and the characteristic timescales of that canting.

Load-bearing premise

The combined polar and transverse EUV-MOKE signals at the Co M-edge are assumed to report true geometric canting of the net magnetization driven by the same competing Dy/Co anisotropies as the quasi-static transition, rather than element-specific demagnetization, differential sublattice dynamics, or optical artifacts that can look like an in-plane component.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved polar and transverse EUV-MOKE measurements at the Co M3,2 edge (complemented by visible MOKE) on ferrimagnetic DyCo5 thin films that undergo a quasi-static spin-reorientation transition (SRT). After femtosecond laser excitation the polar signal drops while a transverse signal rises, which the authors interpret as a transient canting of the magnetization vector from out-of-plane toward in-plane. Characteristic timescales of this reorientation process are extracted and compared with ordinary demagnetization dynamics.

Significance. If the dual-geometry MOKE signals truly map onto a geometric reorientation of the net magnetization driven by the same competing Dy/Co anisotropies that produce the equilibrium SRT, the work would constitute a clear experimental demonstration that an SRT can be launched and tracked on ultrafast timescales. The combination of polar and transverse EUV-MOKE at an elemental resonance is a technically valuable approach for orientation-resolved magnetization dynamics and would be of interest to the ultrafast magnetism and rare-earth/transition-metal ferrimagnet communities. The result is potentially significant provided the geometric-canting interpretation can be secured against element-specific demagnetization and magneto-optical artifacts.

major comments (3)
  1. The central claim that the concurrent polar drop and transverse rise report geometric canting of a single effective magnetization vector (rather than element-specific Co demagnetization, differential sublattice dynamics, or transient changes in magneto-optical constants) is load-bearing yet insufficiently secured. In a collinear ferrimagnet the Co 3d and Dy 4f moments demagnetize on different timescales while remaining antiferromagnetically coupled; an apparent transverse component can appear even without true canting. The abstract and results assert that the polar+transverse combination “allows us to resolve the canting,” but the mapping from two scalar signals onto a unique polar angle θ(t) of the net moment is an assumption. Simultaneous Dy-edge data, an explicit check that |M| stabilizes while θ continues to evolve, or a quantitative reconstruction of θ(t) with error bars are needed
  2. Fluence- and temperature-dependent controls that place the lattice temperature inside versus outside the known equilibrium SRT window are essential for the claim that the observed dynamics are the ultrafast analogue of the quasi-static SRT. Without a fluence series that shows the transverse signal appearing only when the transient temperature enters the SRT regime (and remaining absent below that threshold), the interpretation as anisotropy-driven reorientation rather than generic laser-induced demagnetization remains under-constrained. The manuscript should report these controls or clearly state why they are unavailable and how the claim is otherwise supported.
  3. The paper should quantify how the extracted reorientation timescales compare with the known quasi-static SRT temperature and with the Co and Dy demagnetization times reported in the literature for similar RE-TM systems. If the reorientation time is comparable to or shorter than the Co demagnetization time, an alternative reading in terms of differential sublattice quenching becomes more plausible and must be addressed explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful, constructive report that correctly identifies the load-bearing assumptions of our geometric-canting interpretation. We agree that the polar+transverse Co M-edge data must be more rigorously mapped onto θ(t), that the connection to the equilibrium SRT window needs clearer temperature/fluence context, and that the extracted timescales must be placed against literature demagnetization times. In revision we will add an explicit θ(t) reconstruction with uncertainties, a |M|(t) analysis separating demagnetization from reorientation, quantitative timescale comparisons, and a frank discussion of the missing Dy-edge and full fluence-series controls. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that concurrent polar drop and transverse rise report geometric canting of a single effective magnetization vector (rather than element-specific Co demagnetization, differential sublattice dynamics, or MO artifacts) is load-bearing yet insufficiently secured. Mapping two scalar signals onto a unique polar angle θ(t) is an assumption. Simultaneous Dy-edge data, an explicit check that |M| stabilizes while θ continues to evolve, or a quantitative reconstruction of θ(t) with error bars are needed.

    Authors: We agree this is the central point and that the present manuscript under-secures it. In revision we will (i) reconstruct θ(t) and |M_Co|(t) from the simultaneous polar and transverse Co M-edge Kerr signals under the single-vector assumption appropriate to Co-resonant MOKE, with uncertainties propagated from the measured signals; (ii) show the temporal window in which |M_Co| has largely recovered/stabilized while θ continues to evolve, thereby separating demagnetization from reorientation; and (iii) discuss why a purely collinear differential-demagnetization scenario without canting does not produce a rising transverse signal of the observed sign and magnitude in our geometry, given the known AF coupling and the equilibrium SRT mechanism driven by competing Dy/Co anisotropies. We do not possess simultaneous Dy-edge data; they would require a separate beamtime and cannot be added here. We will state this limitation explicitly and note that Co-resonant MOKE tracks the Co moment, which remains exchange-locked to the net magnetization after the initial demagnetization step. Language asserting that the combination “allows us to resolve the canting” will be qualified accordingly. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Fluence- and temperature-dependent controls that place the lattice temperature inside versus outside the known equilibrium SRT window are essential for the claim that the observed dynamics are the ultrafast analogue of the quasi-static SRT. Without a fluence series showing the transverse signal appearing only when the transient temperature enters the SRT regime (and remaining absent below threshold), the anisotropy-driven reorientation interpretation remains under-constrained. Report these controls or state why unavailable and how the claim is otherwise supported.

    Authors: We agree that a fluence series straddling the equilibrium SRT window would most cleanly establish the analogy. A complete fluence series was not acquired (beamtime constraints). In revision we will (i) add an explicit estimate of the peak lattice temperature rise from absorbed energy density and heat capacity, placing it relative to the known SRT temperature range of our DyCo5 films; (ii) report any available lower-fluence traces or clearly state their absence; and (iii) emphasize that the delayed rise of the transverse signal concurrent with polar recovery is already inconsistent with simple isotropic demagnetization and matches the expected signature once the system is driven into the SRT regime. We will soften definitive claims of an “ultrafast analogue” of the quasi-static SRT and frame the anisotropy-driven reorientation as the most consistent interpretation given the available controls, while acknowledging that a threshold fluence series remains desirable future work. revision: partial

  3. Referee: The paper should quantify how the extracted reorientation timescales compare with the known quasi-static SRT temperature and with the Co and Dy demagnetization times reported in the literature for similar RE-TM systems. If the reorientation time is comparable to or shorter than the Co demagnetization time, an alternative reading in terms of differential sublattice quenching becomes more plausible and must be addressed explicitly.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request and will add a dedicated quantitative comparison in the revised manuscript. We will place our extracted reorientation timescales against (i) the temperature scale and anisotropy energy landscape of the equilibrium SRT in DyCo5 and (ii) published Co and Dy demagnetization times in DyCo5 and related RE-TM ferrimagnets. Our data already show that the transverse (in-plane) signal continues to grow after the initial Co demagnetization (polar drop) has largely completed; we will make this temporal separation quantitative with fitted time constants and error bars. We will explicitly discuss the residual possibility of differential sublattice quenching and why the observed delayed transverse rise, together with the known competing anisotropies that drive the equilibrium SRT, favors a geometric reorientation interpretation once demagnetization has largely finished. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Simultaneous Dy-edge EUV-MOKE data were not measured and cannot be supplied without a new beamtime; the geometric-canting claim therefore rests on Co-resonant polar+transverse signals plus supporting analysis rather than direct two-sublattice orientation tracking.
  • A complete fluence series that maps the appearance of the transverse signal onto the equilibrium SRT temperature window was not acquired and cannot be fully provided in revision; only an estimated peak lattice temperature and any existing lower-fluence traces can be added.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: experimental MOKE measurement paper; timescales are observed signals, not fitted inputs renamed as predictions.

full rationale

This is an experimental condensed-matter paper that reports time-resolved polar and transverse EUV-MOKE (plus visible MOKE) measurements of magnetization dynamics in ferrimagnetic DyCo5 after femtosecond laser excitation. The central claim is observational: a transient canting of the magnetization from out-of-plane toward in-plane, with characteristic timescales read from the concurrent drop of polar MOKE and rise of transverse MOKE at the Co M3,2 edge. There is no self-definitional loop (the reorientation timescale is not defined in terms of a quantity fitted from the same dataset), no fitted parameter renamed as a “prediction,” no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors’ prior work that forces the result, and no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. Any background citations on the equilibrium SRT or MOKE technique are ordinary experimental context and are not load-bearing for the ultrafast result by construction. Residual risk that the dual MOKE signals might be re-read as element-specific demagnetization or optical artifacts rather than geometric canting is an interpretive/correctness concern, not circularity. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks: it measures signals and reports timescales without folding its own inputs back into the claimed result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Experimental condensed-matter paper. No free parameters are fitted in the abstract; none can be enumerated without the full text. Domain assumptions are the standard ones of resonant MOKE magnetometry and ferrimagnetic anisotropy competition. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are invented. The ledger is therefore sparse by nature of the work; the main unstated load-bearing premises are experimental (MOKE geometry-to-vector mapping and identification of dynamics with SRT rather than demagnetization).

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Polar MOKE at the Co M3,2 edge is selectively sensitive to the out-of-plane magnetization component and transverse MOKE to the in-plane component, so their combination reconstructs magnetization canting.
    Stated as the measurement principle in the abstract; standard in magneto-optics but requires geometry, incidence angle, and optical constants that are not given in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The quasi-static spin-reorientation transition in DyCo5 arises from competing Dy 4f and Co 3d magnetic anisotropies, and the same mechanism governs any ultrafast reorientation.
    Used to frame the open question and interpret the laser-driven dynamics as the ultrafast analogue of the known thermal SRT.
  • domain assumption Femtosecond laser excitation deposits energy that can drive the system across the SRT anisotropy balance on ultrafast timescales before full thermal equilibration.
    Implicit premise of the experimental design; common in ultrafast magnetism but not independently proven in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orientation-resolved ultrafast spin reorientation dynamics in ferrimagnetic DyCo$_5$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ESEAZGIN

@misc{pith2026260705946,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orientation-resolved ultrafast spin reorientation dynamics in ferrimagnetic DyCo$_5$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ESEAZGIN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05946}
}
abstract

Under quasi-static conditions, ferrimagnetic DyCo$_5$ thin films exhibit a thermally induced spin-reorientation transition, in which the equilibrium magnetization changes from an out-of-plane to an in-plane orientation, mostly as a result of the competing magnetic anisotropy contributions of the Dy $4f$ rare-earth and Co $3d$ transition-metal sublattices. While this equilibrium transition has been studied, it remains an open question whether such a reorientation can be triggered on ultrafast timescales using femtosecond laser excitation. In this work, we investigate the ultrafast spin-reorientation dynamics in DyCo$_5$. The time-dependent orientation of the magnetization vector following femtosecond laser excitation is quantified by combining polar with transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range, which are sensitive to the out-of-plane and in-plane magnetization component, respectively. Both techniques are implemented at the Co M$_{3,2}$ resonance and are complemented by visible-light MOKE measurements. This combined approach allows us to resolve the canting of the magnetization from an out-of-plane toward an in-plane orientation and to determine the characteristic timescales of the transient spin-reorientation process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.05946 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Hard x-ray reflectometry measurements compared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Time-resolved non-magnetic reflectivity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Simulation of the XUV-P-MOKE asymmetry for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulations of the asymmetry A as a function of the canting angle ∆α for a an increasing in-plane component measured by XUV-T-MOKE and b an increasing out-of-plane component measured by XUV-P-MOKE. plane magnetization measured by XUV-T-MOKE. The photon energy of the in…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time-resolved XUV-P-MOKE (blue triangles) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Polarization-dependent measurements in a XUV-P￾MOKE and b XUV-T-MOKE geometry, comparing the un￾excited (unpumped, circles) to the excited state (squares) recorded at a pump-probe delay of ∆t=200 ps for an inci￾dent excitation fluence of 21.2 mJ cm−2 . In both polar an…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time-resolved XUV-T-MOKE measurements (green circles) at 60.4 eV photon energy upon excitation with an incident fluence of 21.2 mJ cm−2 , applying an alternating magnetic field of ±75 mT. The solid line corresponds to a triple exponential fit and the shaded areas denot…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. D. Stanciu, F. Hansteen, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, and T. Rasing, All-optical mag- netic recording with circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 047601 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    I. Radu, K. Vahaplar, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, H.A.Dürr, T.A.Ostler, J.Barker, R.F.L.Evans, R.W. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, T. Ras- ing, and A. V. Kimel, Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically cou- pled spins, Nature472, 205 (2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Laser-induced magnetization dynamics and reversal in ferrimagnetic al- loys, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 026501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    M. S. E. Hadri, M. Hehn, G. Malinowski, and S. Mangin, Materials and devices for all-optical helicity-dependent switching, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 133002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Scheid, Q

    P. Scheid, Q. Remy, S. Lebègue, G. Malinowski, and S. Mangin, Light induced ultrafast magnetization dy- namicsinmetalliccompounds,JournalofMagnetismand Magnetic Materials560, 169596 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Wisniowski, J

    P. Wisniowski, J. Wrona, T. Stobiecki, S. Cardoso, and P. P. Freitas, Magnetic Tunnel Junctions Based on Out- of-Plane Anisotropy Free and In-Plane Pinned Layer Structures for Magnetic Field Sensors, IEEE Transac- tions on Magnetics48, 3840 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    J.-Y. Chen, L. He, J.-P. Wang, and M. Li, All-Optical Switching of Magnetic Tunnel Junctions with Single Sub- picosecond Laser Pulses, Physical Review Applied7, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    K. P. Belov, A. K. Zvezdin, A. M. Kadomtseva, and R. Z. Levitin, Spin-reorientation transitions in rare-earth mag- nets, Soviet Physics Uspekhi19, 574 (1976)

    work page 1976

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Rasing, Laser-induced ultrafast spin reorientation in the antiferromagnet TmFeO3, Nature429, 850 (2004)

    A.V.Kimel, A.Kirilyuk, A.Tsvetkov, R.V.Pisarev,and T. Rasing, Laser-induced ultrafast spin reorientation in the antiferromagnet TmFeO3, Nature429, 850 (2004)

    2004

  2. [10]

    Tsushima and M

    T. Tsushima and M. Ohokoshi, Spin reorientation in DyCo5, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 31-34, 197 (1983)

    1983

  3. [11]

    Ohkoshi, H.Kobayashi, T

    M. Ohkoshi, H.Kobayashi, T. Katayama, M.Hirano, and T. Tsushima, Spin reorientation in DyCo5, Physica B+C 86-88, 195 (1977)

    1977

  4. [12]

    Donges, S

    A. Donges, S. Khmelevskyi, A. Deak, R.-M. Abru- dan, D. Schmitz, I. Radu, F. Radu, L. Szunyogh, and U. Nowak, Magnetization compensation and spin reori- entation transition in ferrimagnetic DyCo5: Multiscale modeling and element-specific measurements, Physical Review B96, 0244...

    2017

  5. [13]

    R.S.Iskhakov, V.A.Seredkin, S.V.Stolyar, G.I.Frolov, and V. Y. Yakovchuk, Effects of exchange interaction in bilayer DyxCo1-x/NiFe films in the vicinity of compen- sation compositions of amorphous DyCo alloys, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters80, 638 (2004)

    2004

  6. [14]

    Abrudan, M

    R. Abrudan, M. Hennecke, F. Radu, T. Kachel, K. Holl- dack, R. Mitzner, A. Donges, S. Khmelevskyi, A. Deák, L. Szunyogh, U. Nowak, S. Eisebitt, and I. Radu, Element-Specific Magnetization Damping in Ferrimag- netic DyCo5 Alloys Revealed by Ultrafast X-ray Mea- surements, physi...

    2021

  7. [15]

    Richter, S

    J. Richter, S. Jana, R. Behrends, C. S. Davies, D. W. En- gel, M. Hennecke, D. Schick, C. von Korff Schmising, and S. Eisebitt, Spectroscopic probe of ultrafast magnetiza- tion dynamics in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range, Physical Review B111, 214423 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    La-O-Vorakiat, M

    C. La-O-Vorakiat, M. Siemens, M. M. Murnane, H. C. Kapteyn, S. Mathias, M. Aeschlimann, P. Grychtol, R. Adam, C. M. Schneider, J. M. Shaw, H. Nembach, and T. J. Silva, Ultrafast Demagnetization Dynamics at the M Edges of Magnetic Elements Observed Using a Table- top High-Harmo...

    2009

  9. [17]

    S. Jana, R. Knut, S. Muralidhar, R. S. Malik, R. Ste- fanuik, J. Åkerman, O. Karis, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, and N. Pontius, Experimental confirmation of the de- layed Ni demagnetization in FeNi alloy, Applied Physics Letters120, 102404 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    von Korff Schmising, S

    C. von Korff Schmising, S. Jana, K. Yao, M. Hen- necke, P. Scheid, S. Sharma, M. Viret, J.-Y. Chauleau, D. Schick, and S. Eisebitt, Ultrafast behavior of in- duced and intrinsic magnetic moments in cofeb/pt bi- layers probed by element-specific measurements in the extreme ultr...

    2023

  11. [19]

    Zaumseil,RCRefSimW – version 1.09(developed at Leibniz Institute for High Performance Microelectronics (IHP), Frankfurt (Oder), Germany, 2009)

    P. Zaumseil,RCRefSimW – version 1.09(developed at Leibniz Institute for High Performance Microelectronics (IHP), Frankfurt (Oder), Germany, 2009)

    2009

  12. [20]

    K. Yao, F. Willems, C. von Korff Schmising, C. Strüber, P. Hessing, B. Pfau, D. Schick, D. Engel, K. Gerlinger, M. Schneider, and S. Eisebitt, A tabletop setup for ul- trafast helicity-dependent and element-specific absorp- tion spectroscopy and scattering in the extreme ultra...

    2020

  13. [21]

    Willems, S

    F. Willems, S. Sharma, C. v. Korff Schmising, J. K. De- whurst, L. Salemi, D. Schick, P. Hessing, C. Strüber, W. D. Engel, and S. Eisebitt, Magneto-Optical Functions at the 3p Resonances of Fe, Co, and Ni: Ab initio De- scription and Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 217202 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    H. F. Ding, S. Pütter, H. P. Oepen, and J. Kirschner, Ex- perimental method for separating longitudinal and polar Kerr signals, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate- rials212, 5 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    P. M. Oppeneer,Magneto-optical Kerr Spectra, edited by K. H. J. Buschow, Handbook of Magnetic Materials, Vol. 13 (Elsevier, 2001) pp. 229–422

    2001

  16. [24]

    Schick, udkm1Dsim – a Python toolbox for simulating 1D ultrafast dynamics in condensed matter, Computer Physics Communications266, 108031 (2021)

    D. Schick, udkm1Dsim – a Python toolbox for simulating 1D ultrafast dynamics in condensed matter, Computer Physics Communications266, 108031 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    M. Elzo, E. Jal, O. Bunau, S. Grenier, Y. Joly, A. Y. Ramos, H. C. N. Tolentino, J. M. Tonnerre, and N. Jaouen, X-ray resonant magnetic reflectivity of strat- ified magnetic structures: Eigenwave formalism and ap- plication to a W/Fe/W trilayer, Journal of Magnetism and Magnet...

    2012

  18. [26]

    B. L. Henke, E. M. Gullikson, and J. C. Davis, X-Ray Interactions: Photoabsorption, Scattering, Transmission, and Reflection at E = 50-30,000 eV, Z = 1-92, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables54, 181 (1993). 10

    1993

  19. [27]

    Wietstruk, A

    M. Wietstruk, A. Melnikov, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, M. Sultan, C. Gahl, M. Weinelt, H. A. Dürr, and U. Bovensiepen, Hot-electron-driven enhancement of spin-lattice coupling in Gd and Tb4fferromagnets ob- served by femtosecond x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Phys. Re...

    2011

  20. [28]

    Eschenlohr, M

    A. Eschenlohr, M. Sultan, A. Melnikov, N. Bergeard, J. Wieczorek, T. Kachel, C. Stamm, and U. Bovensiepen, Role of spin-lattice coupling in the ultrafast demagne- tization of Gd1−xTbx alloys, Phys. Rev. B89, 214423 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    J. K. Lang, Y. Baer, and P. A. Cox, Study of the 4f and valence band density of states in rare-earth metals. II. Experiment and results, Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics11, 121 (1981)

    1981

  22. [30]

    Hennecke, D

    M. Hennecke, D. Schick, T. Sidiropoulos, F. Willems, A. Heilmann, M. Bock, L. Ehrentraut, D. Engel, P. Hessing, B. Pfau, M. Schmidbauer, A. Furchner, M. Schnuerer, C. von Korff Schmising, and S. Eisebitt, Ultrafast element- and depth-resolved magnetization dy- namics probed by...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Hennecke, D

    M. Hennecke, D. Schick, T. P. H. Sidiropoulos, J.-X. Lin, Z. Guo, G. Malinowski, M. Mattern, L. Ehrentraut, M. Schmidbauer, M. Schnuerer, C. von Korff Schmising, S. Mangin, M. Hehn, and S. Eisebitt, Transient domain boundary drives ultrafast magnetisation reversal, Nature Comm...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.