Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

A Face-on View of Interstellar Dust in the Galactic Plane

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read U-Net inversion of red-clump extinction yields face-on dust maps of the Galactic plane that look like M74 and give a 2.90 kpc dust-disk scale length.

desk verdict Useful-sounding full-plane midplane dust cubes from RC+U-Net, with a 2.90 kpc scale length and an M74 comparison; the product stands or falls on selection and inversion fidelity the abstract cannot prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06016 v1 pith:3IISDLBE submitted 2026-07-07 astro-ph.GA

Lin Zhang , Bingqiu Chen , Fei Qin , Guangxing Li , Haibo Yuan , Yi Ren This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords interstellardustGalacticplaneredclumpstarsextinctionU-NetspiralarmsdiskscalelengthMilkyWaystructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds three-dimensional dust density maps of the thin Galactic plane (|Z| < 25 pc) across the full 360° of longitude out to about 7 kpc. Red-clump stars selected from near- and mid-infrared photometry, combined with earlier stellar catalogs, supply the line-of-sight extinction measurements. A U-Net convolutional neural network inverts those extinctions into volume density at 10, 50, and 100 pc resolution. The resulting maps show spiral arms, inter-arm spurs, and giant cavities whose overall morphology closely matches the face-on spiral galaxy M74. Fitting an exponential disk to the dust density returns a radial scale length of 2.90 kpc, slightly larger than the stellar thin-disk scale length. The public maps are offered as a new benchmark for extinction correction, Galactic structure studies, and the coupling between star formation and the interstellar medium.

What carries the argument

A U-Net convolutional neural network that inverts the cumulative line-of-sight extinction of red-clump stars into three-dimensional dust volume density at 10–100 pc resolution across the plane.

What would settle it

An independent three-dimensional dust map of the same |Z| < 25 pc volume, built from a different tracer (for example Gaia XP extinction or molecular-cloud catalogs) that either recovers a dust scale length significantly different from 2.90 kpc or fails to show the claimed spiral-arm and cavity morphology.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By applying a U-Net to invert red-clump line-of-sight extinctions, the authors produce face-on dust density maps of the Galactic plane that resolve spiral arms, inter-arm spurs, and giant cavities, reveal a morphology resembling M74, and yield an exponential dust-disk scale length of 2.90 kpc.

Load-bearing premise

Red-clump stars selected from near- and mid-infrared photometry are pure, complete, and well-calibrated standard candles whose extinctions can be inverted without systematic bias into unbiased dust density out to 7 kpc.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs three-dimensional dust density maps of the Galactic plane (|Z|<25 pc) over the full 360° in longitude and out to ~7 kpc by selecting red-clump (RC) stars from near- and mid-infrared photometry (augmented by prior stellar catalogs) and inverting their line-of-sight extinction with a U-Net convolutional neural network. Maps are produced at 10, 50, and 100 pc resolution and are reported to show spiral arms, inter-arm spurs, and giant cavities whose face-on morphology closely resembles that of M74. From these maps the authors measure an exponential dust-disk scale length of 2.90 kpc, slightly larger than that of the stellar thin disk, and release the maps publicly as a benchmark for extinction correction and Galactic-structure studies.

Significance. A publicly released, full-plane thin-layer dust density map reaching ~7 kpc at 10–100 pc resolution would be a substantial community resource for extinction correction, studies of spiral structure and the ISM, and comparisons between dust and stellar disks. The reported M74-like morphology and a concrete scale-length measurement (2.90 kpc) are potentially high-impact if the inversion is shown to be unbiased. The public data release is a clear strength. Significance is therefore high conditional on the fidelity of the RC sample and the U-Net inversion—precisely the points that must be demonstrated in the methods and validation sections.

major comments (3)
  1. The central numerical and morphological claims rest on the purity, completeness, distance calibration, and extinction zero-point of the RC sample and on the ability of the U-Net to recover unbiased 3D density at 10–100 pc resolution. The abstract states the method but does not report (or the available material does not allow verification of) synthetic recovery tests with known density fields, selection-function modeling, extinction zero-point systematics, or quantitative comparison to independent 3D dust maps. Without those load-bearing tests the 2.90 kpc scale length and the M74-like morphology cannot be regarded as established.
  2. The exponential scale length of 2.90 kpc is presented as a measured result. The radial range, functional form (pure exponential vs. broken or with a hole), treatment of the inner Galaxy, and formal uncertainties (including systematics from distance and extinction calibration) are not stated in the material available for review. A scale length is only as robust as the radial coverage and the error budget; both must be documented and shown to be free of selection-driven bias before the number can be used as a benchmark relative to the stellar thin disk.
  3. The claimed morphological resemblance to M74 is a strong interpretive statement. Visual similarity alone is insufficient for a journal claim of this weight; quantitative metrics (e.g., arm–interarm contrast, pitch-angle statistics, cavity size distribution, or Fourier/mode decomposition) and a clear statement of which map resolution is used for the comparison are needed so that the resemblance can be evaluated and reproduced.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and summary material do not specify the training data, loss function, or regularization of the U-Net, nor whether any spatial prior (e.g., smoothness or arm templates) is imposed. Even a brief statement of these choices would help readers assess circularity risk.
  2. Resolution is quoted as 10, 50, and 100 pc; it should be clarified whether these are voxel sizes, effective FWHM after regularization, or something else, and how resolution degrades with distance.
  3. The public-release statement is welcome; the data products (density cubes, associated uncertainty maps, RC catalog) and access method should be listed explicitly so that the benchmark claim is actionable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. We agree that the scientific weight of the 2.90 kpc scale length and the M74-like morphological claim rests on the fidelity of the red-clump sample and the U-Net inversion, and that these foundations must be documented more explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will add synthetic recovery tests, a fuller description of the selection function and extinction zero-point, an expanded error budget for the scale-length fit, and quantitative morphological metrics. We believe these additions will place the public maps and the reported results on a firmer footing while preserving the core scientific content.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central numerical and morphological claims rest on the purity, completeness, distance calibration, and extinction zero-point of the RC sample and on the ability of the U-Net to recover unbiased 3D density at 10–100 pc resolution. The abstract states the method but does not report (or the available material does not allow verification of) synthetic recovery tests with known density fields, selection-function modeling, extinction zero-point systematics, or quantitative comparison to independent 3D dust maps. Without those load-bearing tests the 2.90 kpc scale length and the M74-like morphology cannot be regarded as established.

    Authors: We agree that these load-bearing tests must be presented clearly and that the current manuscript does not give them sufficient prominence. In the revision we will (i) add a dedicated validation section showing U-Net recovery of known density fields (including spiral arms, spurs, and cavities) injected into mock RC catalogs that incorporate the same photometric selection, distance uncertainties, and extinction noise as the real sample; (ii) document the RC selection function, purity/completeness estimates, and distance calibration, including residual systematics; (iii) quantify extinction zero-point offsets and their propagation into density; and (iv) provide quantitative comparisons (pixel-wise and radially binned) against independent 3D dust maps where they overlap. These additions will allow readers to assess residual bias at 10–100 pc resolution. We do not claim the present text already contains all of the above at the required level of detail; the revision will supply it. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The exponential scale length of 2.90 kpc is presented as a measured result. The radial range, functional form (pure exponential vs. broken or with a hole), treatment of the inner Galaxy, and formal uncertainties (including systematics from distance and extinction calibration) are not stated in the material available for review. A scale length is only as robust as the radial coverage and the error budget; both must be documented and shown to be free of selection-driven bias before the number can be used as a benchmark relative to the stellar thin disk.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the radial range, functional form, inner-Galaxy treatment, and full error budget are not stated with the clarity required for a benchmark number. In the revision we will specify the radial interval used for the fit, test pure-exponential versus broken-exponential and central-hole models, describe how the inner Galaxy is masked or down-weighted, and report both statistical and systematic uncertainties (distance scale, extinction zero-point, selection completeness, and resolution choice). We will also show that the recovered scale length is stable under reasonable variations of these choices and is not driven by selection bias. The numerical value 2.90 kpc will be retained only if it remains the preferred fit after this expanded analysis; otherwise we will update it and the associated comparison to the stellar thin disk. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The claimed morphological resemblance to M74 is a strong interpretive statement. Visual similarity alone is insufficient for a journal claim of this weight; quantitative metrics (e.g., arm–interarm contrast, pitch-angle statistics, cavity size distribution, or Fourier/mode decomposition) and a clear statement of which map resolution is used for the comparison are needed so that the resemblance can be evaluated and reproduced.

    Authors: We accept that a visual resemblance, however striking, is not by itself sufficient for the claim as currently worded. In the revision we will (i) state explicitly which resolution map (10, 50, or 100 pc) is used for the comparison; (ii) add quantitative metrics—arm–interarm contrast, pitch-angle measurements, cavity size distribution, and a simple Fourier/mode decomposition—applied consistently to both our dust map and a publicly available M74 image or model; and (iii) soften the language from an unqualified “closely resembling” to a statement that is supported by those metrics. The qualitative impression of spiral arms, spurs, and giant cavities will remain, but it will be subordinated to the quantitative comparison so that the claim can be evaluated and reproduced by others. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; dust maps and 2.90 kpc scale length are ordinary measurements from RC extinction inverted by U-Net, not forced by construction or self-definition.

full rationale

From the abstract (the only primary source text supplied), the derivation chain is: select red-clump stars from NIR/MIR photometry plus prior catalogs → obtain line-of-sight extinction → invert with a U-Net CNN to produce 3-D dust density maps at 10/50/100 pc resolution over |Z|<25 pc, full 360° longitude, to ~7 kpc → measure morphology (spiral arms, spurs, cavities resembling M74) and fit an exponential scale length of 2.90 kpc from those maps. Nothing in the supplied text defines the scale length or the morphological features in terms of the inputs, imposes an exponential form that is then “recovered,” or renames a fitted parameter as a prediction. The U-Net is a standard inversion tool; its use does not create a definitional loop between input extinction and output density. No uniqueness theorem, self-citation load-bearing premise, or ansatz smuggled via prior author work appears in the abstract. Residual scientific risk (RC purity, distance/extinction zero-points, inversion regularization) is a correctness/systematics concern, not circularity. Per the analyzer rules, when no Eq. X = Eq. Y reduction or fitted-input-as-prediction can be quoted, the honest finding is score 0 with empty steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review: free parameters of the U-Net, extinction calibration constants, and any radial-fit functional form are not specified. Core domain assumptions are that IR-selected red clump stars are reliable extinction tracers and that a U-Net can invert LOS extinction into unbiased 3D density. No new physical entities (particles, forces) are introduced; the 'maps' and 'scale length' are measurements, not invented mediators.

free parameters (2)
  • Dust-disk exponential scale length = 2.90 kpc
    Reported as 2.90 kpc from a fit to the derived density maps; the abstract does not state whether the exponential form, radial range, or other fit choices were fixed a priori or how uncertainties were obtained. Treated as a measured output that may embed fit choices.
  • U-Net / inversion hyperparameters and any training priors
    Not given in the abstract; network architecture, loss, regularization, and any density priors used in training would act as free or semi-free choices that shape the recovered maps.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Red clump stars selected from near- and mid-IR photometry (plus prior catalogs) are sufficiently pure and complete standard candles for LOS extinction mapping across the plane to 7 kpc.
    Central to the entire map construction; stated in the abstract as the tracer basis.
  • domain assumption A U-Net convolutional neural network can invert line-of-sight extinction distributions into three-dimensional dust density without large systematic artifacts at 10–100 pc resolution.
    The inversion step is the method that produces the density cubes; validity is assumed, not demonstrated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Restricting to |Z|<25 pc yields a representative face-on view of the Galactic dust disk for morphology and radial scale-length measurement.
    The midplane cut defines the sample geometry used for the M74 comparison and the exponential fit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Face-on View of Interstellar Dust in the Galactic Plane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3IISDLBE

@misc{pith2026260706016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Face-on View of Interstellar Dust in the Galactic Plane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3IISDLBE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06016}
}
abstract

Interstellar dust is a fundamental component of the Milky Way, influencing star formation, galactic evolution, and observations across the electromagnetic spectrum. Using red clump stars selected from near- and mid-infrared photometry, together with stellar catalogs from previous studies, we construct dust density maps of the Galactic plane ({$|Z|<25$}\,pc) covering the full $360^\circ$ in longitude and reaching distances up to $7$\,kpc. By applying a U-Net convolutional neural network to invert the line-of-sight extinction distribution, we obtain dust density maps at resolutions of $10$, $50$, and $100$\,pc, which reveal detailed structures including spiral arms, inter-arm spurs, and giant cavities. The dust distribution in the Galactic plane exhibits a morphology closely resembling that of the so-called Phantom galaxy M74. The derived exponential scale length of the Galactic dust disk is $2.90$\,kpc, slightly larger than that of the stellar thin disk. Our publicly available dust maps provide a new benchmark for extinction correction, studies of Galactic structure, and the investigation of the interplay between star formation and the interstellar medium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06016 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Areal coverage of the VVV, GLIMPSE, and UKIDSS surveys in Galactic coordinates. The pink regions indicate the VVV bulge and VVV disk fields. The green regions show the UKIDSS GPS areas. The cyan, red, orange, and purple regions indicate the coverage of GLIMPSE I, GLIMPSE II, GLIMPSE 3D, and Vela-Carina, respectively. The horizontal lines mark the Galactic latitude boundaries of b = ±2 ◦ . (3.4 µm), W2 (4.6 µm), W3 (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Reddening-corrected CMD for all sources in the sample. The vertical dashed lines mark the RC color selec￾tion boundaries [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of the selection precision of our RC candidates in the CMD. difference sensitive to extinction while being relatively insensitive to the intrinsic stellar parameters. Following S. R. Majewski et al. (2011), we adopt the extinction coefficients from R. Indebetouw et al. (2005). We measure extinction for GLIMPSE sources using the relation AKS = 0.918 × (H − [4.5µ] − 0.08). Since R. Indebetouw et al. (2005… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatial density distribution of stellar samples in Galactic plane. Left panel: the Gaia BP/RP stellar sample from X. Zhang & G. M. Green (2025) in the Galactic plane. Middle panel: our RC sample combined with that of M. Lucey et al. (2020) in the Galactic plane. Right …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of AKS derived from RC candidates with the reddening E from X. Zhang & G. M. Green (2025). The black line shows the linear fit. stars from X. Zhang & G. M. Green (2025) to ensure re￾liable extinction measurements. Based on the basic reli￾ability cuts recomme…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic of the U-Net architecture, shown with the MR configuration as an example [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: LOS extinction maps of the Galactic plane in the LR (left panel), MR (middle panel), and SR (right panel) fields. The Sun is located at the center (X = 0 kpc, Y = 0 kpc). The Galactic center lies to the right. From left to right, the panels show the median extinction v…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dust density distribution in the Galactic plane (|Z| < 25 pc) from the U-Net model. The color scales represent the differential extinction δAKS . The Sun is located at the center (X = 0 kpc, Y = 0 kpc), marked by a red star symbol. The Galactic center lies to the right…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of AKS from sample stars with (AKS )ρ, the LOS extinction integrated from the derived dust density maps, for LR (left), MR (middle), and SR (right). The black dashed line indicates the 1:1 relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of true and predicted dust densities for the 1,800 validation maps in the LR (left), MR (middle), and SR (right) regions. The black line marks the 1:1 relation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Uncertainties of the derived dust density maps for the LR (left), MR (middle) and SR (right) fields, respectively. (2024). G. Edenhofer et al. (2024) uses distance and ex￾tinction estimates for 54 million stars derived from Gaia BP/RP spectra from X. Zhang et al. (202…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of our dust map in the SR region (left panel) with the dust map from G. Edenhofer et al. (2024) (right panel). The X and Y ranges are from −1.25 kpc to 1.25 kpc. A polar grid is overlaid on the figure, with radial ticks at 0.25 kpc intervals and Galactic lo…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of our dust density distribution in the MR region (left panel) with the results from J. L. Vergely et al. (2022) (right panel). A polar grid is overlaid on the figure, with radial ticks at 1 kpc intervals and Galactic longitude lines at 30◦ intervals. cloud…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Comparison of our dust density distribution in the LR region (left panel) with the dust maps from C. Hottier et al. (2020) (middle panel), and G. M. Green et al. (2019) and C. Zucker et al. (2025) (right panel). A polar grid is overlaid on the figure, with radial tick…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Comparison of the dust distribution in the MR region with the spatial distributions of OB-type stars and molecular clouds. Left panel: OB-type stars from B.-Q. Chen et al. (2019b, sky blue points) used for comparison. The best-fit spiral arms from B.-Q. Chen et al. (2…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Scale length of the dust disk. The skyblue points show the mean dust density as a function of Galactocentric distance R. The red line shows the exponential fit. of the dust disk is 2.90+0.6 −0.5 kpc. Since our model does not account for the flaring structure and the v…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Features of the distribution of absorbing matter in the local system

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Using a new dust map, the authors confirm long-wavelength vertical oscillations in three nearby superclouds (Radcliffe Wave, Malpolon+Natrix, Vela Ridge) and report no such waves in Split or Sagittarius Spur Extension.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2017, ApJL, 849, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa92c3

    Alonso-Garc´ ıa, J., Minniti, D., Catelan, M., et al. 2017, ApJL, 849, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa92c3

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa92c3 2017

  2. [2]

    Alves, D. R. 2000, ApJ, 539, 732, doi: 10.1086/309278

    work page doi:10.1086/309278 2000

  3. [3]

    C., & Chiti, A

    An, D., Beers, T. C., & Chiti, A. 2024, ApJS, 272, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad3641

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad3641 2024

  4. [4]

    T., Watkins, E

    Barnes, A. T., Watkins, E. J., Meidt, S. E., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca7b9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aca7b9 2023

  5. [5]

    A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B

    Benjamin, R. A., Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953, doi: 10.1086/376696

    work page doi:10.1086/376696 2003

  6. [6]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/166

    Berry, M., Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Sesar, B., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/166

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/2/166 2012

  7. [7]

    M., Snell, R

    Carpenter, J. M., Snell, R. L., & Schloerb, F. P. 1995, ApJ, 445, 246, doi: 10.1086/175692

    work page doi:10.1086/175692 1995

  8. [8]

    Nature Communications , keywords =

    Chen, B., Li, G., Yuan, H., et al. 2025, Nature Communications, 16, 10558, doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65591-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65591-5 2025

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 7600, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae523

    Chen, B.-Q., Qin, F., & Li, G.-X. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 7600, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae523

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Q., Schultheis, M., Jiang, B

    Chen, B. Q., Schultheis, M., Jiang, B. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219682

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 1192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1192

    Chen, B.-Q., Liu, X.-W., Yuan, H.-B., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1192

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    2019a, MNRAS, 483, 4277, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3341

    Chen, B.-Q., Huang, Y., Yuan, H.-B., et al. 2019a, MNRAS, 483, 4277, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3341

    doi

  5. [13]

    2019b, MNRAS, 487, 1400, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1357

    Chen, B.-Q., Huang, Y., Hou, L.-G., et al. 2019b, MNRAS, 487, 1400, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1357

    doi

  6. [14]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 351, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa235

    Chen, B.-Q., Li, G.-X., Yuan, H.-B., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 351, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa235

    2020 doi

  7. [15]

    Q., Casagrande, L., Zhao, G., et al

    Chen, Y. Q., Casagrande, L., Zhao, G., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d0f

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    L., Meade, M

    Churchwell, E., Babler, B. L., Meade, M. R., et al. 2009, PASP, 121, 213, doi: 10.1086/597811

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2013, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products,, Explanatory Supplement to the AllWISE Data Release Products, by R. M. Cutri et al

    2013

  10. [18]

    E., Bailer-Jones, C

    Dharmawardena, T. E., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Fouesneau, M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 3480, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1474

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    L., & Bonnell, I

    Dobbs, C. L., & Bonnell, I. A. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 873, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10146.x

    2006 doi

  12. [20]

    Drimmel, R., & Spergel, D. N. 2001, ApJ, 556, 181, doi: 10.1086/321556

    2001 doi

  13. [21]

    2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J

    Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018,...

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    A., Marchuk, A

    Gontcharov, G. A., Marchuk, A. A., Savchenko, S. S., et al. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 125016, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ae12a6

    2025 doi

  15. [23]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Schlafly, E

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 810, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/1/25

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    J., & Sarajedini, A

    Grocholski, A. J., & Sarajedini, A. 2002, AJ, 123, 1603, doi: 10.1086/339027

    2002 doi

  19. [27]

    2021, ApJ, 906, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc68a

    Guo, H.-L., Chen, B.-Q., Yuan, H.-B., et al. 2021, ApJ, 906, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc68a

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Hawkins, K., Leistedt, B., Bovy, J., & Hogg, D. W. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 722, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1655

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    2020, A&A, 641, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037573

    Hottier, C., Babusiaux, C., & Arenou, F. 2020, A&A, 641, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037573

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    S., Babler, B

    Indebetouw, R., Mathis, J. S., Babler, B. L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 931, doi: 10.1086/426679 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Sesar, B., Juri´ c, M., et al. 2008, ApJ, 684, 287, doi: 10.1086/589678

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    L., et al

    Lallement, R., Babusiaux, C., Vergely, J. L., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834695

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Almaini, O., et al

    Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040.x

    2007 doi

  25. [33]

    2018, ApJ, 858, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabaef

    Li, L., Shen, S., Hou, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 858, 75, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabaef

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    2021, A&A, 649, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

    Lindegren, L., Bastian, U., Biermann, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    W., Hoare, M

    Lucas, P. W., Hoare, M. G., Longmore, A., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 136, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13924.x

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    S., & Hawkins, K

    Lucey, M., Ting, Y.-S., Ramachandra, N. S., & Hawkins, K. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3087, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1226

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    2011, ApJ, 731, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/53

    Mainzer, A., Bauer, J., Grav, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 731, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/53

    2011 doi

  30. [38]

    2007, Galactic Structure and Star Formation in Vela-Carina,, Spitzer Proposal ID 40791

    Majewski, S., Babler, B., Churchwell, E., et al. 2007, Galactic Structure and Star Formation in Vela-Carina,, Spitzer Proposal ID 40791

    2007

  31. [39]

    R., Zasowski, G., & Nidever, D

    Majewski, S. R., Zasowski, G., & Nidever, D. L. 2011, ApJ, 739, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/25

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    J., Montillaud, J., Cambr´ esy, L., & Cornu, D

    Marshall, D. J., Montillaud, J., Cambr´ esy, L., & Cornu, D. 2025, A&A, 704, A118, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554622

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    2006, A&A, 453, 635, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053842 17

    Picaud, S. 2006, A&A, 453, 635, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053842 17

    2006 doi

  34. [42]

    W., Emerson, J

    Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al. 2010, NewA, 15, 433, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2009.12.002

    2010 doi

  35. [43]

    Plevne, O., ¨Onal Ta¸ s,¨O., Bilir, S., & Seabroke, G. M. 2020, ApJ, 893, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab80bb

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    E., & Sabiu, C

    Qin, F., Parkinson, D., Hong, S. E., & Sabiu, C. G. 2023, JCAP, 2023, 062, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/06/062

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Menten, K

    Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4a11

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1505.04597, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597

    Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. 2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1505.04597, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597

    2015 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    2018, A&A, 609, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731572

    Lallement, R. 2018, A&A, 609, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731572

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    2020, ApJL, 905, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abccc4

    Ruoyi, Z., & Haibo, Y. 2020, ApJL, 905, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abccc4

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    2002, MNRAS, 337, 332, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05917.x

    Salaris, M., & Girardi, L. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 332, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05917.x

    2002 doi

  42. [50]

    Q., Jiang, B

    Schultheis, M., Chen, B. Q., Jiang, B. W., et al. 2014, A&A, 566, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322788

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  44. [52]

    2013, A&A, 552, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220046

    Soto, M., Barb´ a, R., Gunthardt, G., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A101, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220046

    2013 doi

  45. [53]

    2018, ApJL, 858, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabf8e

    Ting, Y.-S., Hawkins, K., & Rix, H.-W. 2018, ApJL, 858, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aabf8e

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N

    Vergely, J. L., Lallement, R., & Cox, N. L. J. 2022, A&A, 664, A174, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243319

    2022 doi

  47. [55]

    2025a, ApJS, 280, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aded89

    Wang, T., Yuan, H., Chen, B., et al. 2025a, ApJS, 280, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aded89

    doi

  48. [56]

    2025b, ApJS, 280, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adea39

    Wang, T., Yuan, H., Chen, B., et al. 2025b, ApJS, 280, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/adea39

    doi

  49. [57]

    2015, MNRAS, 450, 4050, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv745

    Wegg, C., Gerhard, O., & Portail, M. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 4050, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv745

    2015 doi

  50. [58]

    W., Roellig, T

    Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1, doi: 10.1086/422992

    2004 doi

  51. [59]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  52. [60]

    2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 095004, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ade7f0

    Yu, Z., Chen, B.-Q., & Liu, X.-W. 2025, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 095004, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/ade7f0

    2025 doi

  53. [61]

    R., Indebetouw, R., et al

    Zasowski, G., Majewski, S. R., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 510, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/510

    2009 doi

  54. [62]

    2026, ApJ, 998, 344, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae381d

    Zhang, R., Yuan, H., Chen, B., et al. 2026, ApJ, 998, 344, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae381d

    2026 doi

  55. [63]

    Zhang, X., & Green, G. M. 2025, Science, 387, 1209, doi: 10.1126/science.ado9787

    2025 doi

  56. [64]

    M., & Rix, H.-W

    Zhang, X., Green, G. M., & Rix, H.-W. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1855, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1941

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    A., Alves, J., et al

    Zucker, C., Goodman, A. A., Alves, J., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 334, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04286-5

    2022 doi

  58. [66]

    K., Speagle, J

    Zucker, C., Saydjari, A. K., Speagle, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adfbe6

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.