Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Resonant-impurity scanning tunneling spectroscopy in altermagnets: dual Fano resonance and Landau-quantization-induced nodal spin contrast

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Resonant-impurity STM on a d-wave altermagnet produces dual Fano resonances and, under Landau quantization, spin-dependent nodal patterns with large local spin contrast.

desk verdict Clean, well-derived theory paper: dual Fano plus Landau nodal spin contrast for resonant impurities on d-wave altermagnets; specialized but solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06885 v2 pith:6G24BPE6 submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.mes-hall

Yuan Hong , Zhigang Wang , Zhen-Guo Fu , Feng Chi , Cong Wang , Wei Zhang , Ping Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords altermagnetresonantimpuritySTM/STSFanoresonanceLandaulevelsspincontrastGreen'sfunctiond-waveanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a single resonant impurity under an STM tip can serve as a local, phase-sensitive probe of altermagnetic band anisotropy. Using a Green's-function treatment of a resonant impurity hybridized to a two-dimensional d-wave altermagnetic substrate, it shows that the spin-resolved local spectral function carries two complementary signatures of the altermagnetic splitting. With no magnetic field, interference between direct tip-impurity tunneling and substrate-mediated tunneling produces a dual Fano resonance; the spatial periods of the impurity-induced density-of-states oscillations and of the Fano q-factor both encode the dimensionless altermagnetic parameter J, and tip position plus Fermi energy can be tuned for spin-selective tunneling. In a strong perpendicular field that resolves Landau levels, the same Green's function develops spin-dependent nodal structures whose mismatch between opposite spins yields a large local spin contrast (polarization approaching 1). Together these results argue that resonant-impurity STM/STS maps both the real-space anisotropy and the phase structure of altermagnetic quasiparticles.

What carries the argument

The spin-resolved local spectral function of the tip, expressed through the finite-distance substrate Green's function that connects impurity and tip (Hankel form at zero field, Whittaker form under Landau quantization). This object generates the dual Fano line shape, the anisotropic oscillations, and the nodal spin contrast.

What would settle it

STM/STS maps of a resonant impurity on a candidate d-wave altermagnet should show spin-resolved oscillation periods (or Fano-q periods) that match the predicted anisotropy factor κ_σ(θ) and, under a strong perpendicular field, spin-dependent nodal ellipses whose mismatch produces large local spin polarization near the impurity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Resonant-impurity STM/STS is a phase-sensitive local probe of altermagnetic band anisotropy: zero-field dual Fano resonances and the spatial periods of both the density-of-states oscillations and the Fano q-factor encode the altermagnetic splitting J, while Landau-quantized spin-dependent nodal mismatch produces a large local spin contrast.

Load-bearing premise

The continuum single-pocket parabolic d-wave model with contact hybridization, neglected substrate Zeeman splitting, and a shallow-pocket energy scale remains faithful for real candidate materials under the magnetic fields needed to resolve Landau levels.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The altermagnetic splitting strength J can be extracted locally from the ratio of spin-up and spin-down oscillation periods (or Fano-q periods) without relying on bulk transport or ARPES.
  • Tip position and Fermi energy can be used to suppress one spin channel while leaving the other finite, enabling spin-selective tunneling in compensated magnets.
  • Under resolved Landau levels, nodal mismatch between opposite spins produces near-unit local spin polarization that can be further enhanced by aligning the impurity resonance with the Fermi energy.
  • Resonant-impurity STS becomes a practical phase-sensitive diagnostic of altermagnetic band geometry complementary to quasiparticle-interference and bulk probes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the nodal spin contrast survives realistic disorder and finite temperature, the same geometry could serve as a local spin-filter or spin-readout element in compensated-magnet devices.
  • The dual Fano mechanism should appear in other anisotropic spin-split hosts (for example certain noncollinear antiferromagnets) whenever an impurity orbital couples both directly to the tip and through a direction-dependent continuum.
  • Mapping the Fano-q period versus tip angle offers an experimental route to reconstruct the full angular form of the altermagnetic anisotropy factor without assuming a pure d-wave continuum model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the spin-resolved local spectral function of a resonant impurity on a two-dimensional d-wave altermagnetic substrate in an STM geometry, using a noninteracting resonant-level model and Green’s-function methods. In zero field, interference between direct tip–impurity tunneling and altermagnet-mediated tunneling produces a dual Fano resonance; the anisotropic spin-dependent LDOS oscillations and Fano q-factors encode the altermagnetic splitting J via the anisotropy factor κ_σ(θ) in the finite-distance substrate propagator. Spin-selective tunneling is obtained by tuning Fermi energy and tip position. In a strong out-of-plane field, Landau quantization yields spin-dependent real-space nodal patterns (from Whittaker-function zeros), and nodal mismatch between opposite spins produces large local spin contrast (P up to ~0.99). Appendices give EOM identities, regularization of the 2D coincident-point self-energy, recovery of the Hankel limit from Whittaker functions, a Lippmann–Schwinger account of Fano asymmetry, and a T-matrix mapping.

Significance. If the continuum single-pocket picture remains a useful guide for candidate altermagnets, the work supplies a concrete, phase-sensitive STM/STS protocol that complements momentum-space and transport probes of altermagnetic band anisotropy. Strengths include a complete and internally consistent Green’s-function derivation (Appendices A–F), an explicit dual-Fano mechanism that goes beyond pure potential scattering, a falsifiable extraction of J from spin-resolved spatial periods of both LDOS and Fano q (Eq. 32), and a clear high-field prediction of nodal spin contrast controlled by impurity detuning and Landau filling. The results are of direct interest to the growing experimental altermagnet community and to STM theory of anisotropic magnets.

major comments (2)
  1. The central claim is theoretically sound within the stated model, but its experimental reach rests on the continuum single-pocket parabolic d-wave Hamiltonian, contact hybridization, neglected substrate Zeeman, and the shallow-pocket window of Appendix G (EF ≃ 5.3 meV, k_F^{-1} ≃ 3.8 nm, J = 0.4). Section II and Appendix G already flag this idealization; the manuscript should add a short, explicit discussion of how multi-pocket Fermi surfaces, lattice-scale anisotropy, and residual substrate Zeeman (Appendix D, Fig. S1) would modify the dual-Fano line shapes and the Landau nodal contrast, and under what conditions the proposed J-extraction (Eq. 32) remains robust. This is a scope clarification, not a derivation error.
  2. In the Landau-quantized regime the large spin contrast (Fig. 5, P_max ≈ 0.99) is obtained for ħω_L = 5×10^3 η and ζ = 5. The text should state more clearly how sensitive this contrast is to realistic effective broadening η_eff (disorder, temperature, instrumental resolution) relative to ħω_L, and whether the nodal mismatch survives when η_eff is only moderately smaller than ħω_L. A brief estimate or additional panel would strengthen the high-field claim without changing the formal result.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and title use “dual Fano resonance”; a one-sentence clarification in Sec. III that this refers to the coexistence of substrate-phase-controlled and path-interference Fano mechanisms (λ → 0 vs finite λ) would help readers unfamiliar with the terminology.
  2. Fig. 2 and Fig. 5 use polar (k_F d, θ) plots; adding a short note on the color scale (especially the log scale in Fig. 5) and the fixed parameters (Δ/Γ, ζ, η) in the captions would improve readability.
  3. Notation: both E_σ = ε_0 + σ ε_d and Δ_σ = E_F − (ξ + σ ε_d) appear; a brief reminder that ε_d is the impurity Zeeman energy (retained) while substrate Zeeman is dropped would reduce confusion when reading Appendices D and G.
  4. Typos/formatting: “d-wave” sometimes appears as “d% -wave” in the abstract source; “ˆC4 ˆT” spacing is inconsistent; a few references (e.g., arXiv e-prints) could be updated if journal versions exist.
  5. Appendix G’s parameter estimates are useful; a single sentence in the main text pointing to the shallow-pocket motivation (STM length scale and moderate ζ) would help readers who skip the appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: dual Fano and nodal spin contrast follow from a self-contained Green’s-function derivation of a stated model Hamiltonian, with free parameters chosen for illustration rather than fitted and re-predicted.

full rationale

The paper’s load-bearing chain is: noninteracting resonant-level Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–6) → tip-projected local spectral function via full retarded Green’s function (Eqs. 8–13) → finite-distance substrate propagator encoding κ_σ(θ) (Eq. 14, Appendices B–C) → regularized impurity Green’s function (Eqs. 18–22, Appendix D) → generalized Fano form with q_σ = tan[arg Z_σ] (Eqs. 23–27). Dual Fano line shapes, spin-resolved periods L_σ(θ) and extraction of J (Eqs. 31–32, 34), interference zeros (Eq. 38), and Landau nodal mismatch from Whittaker zeros of W_ζ,0(R_σ²) are algebraic consequences of those identities, not inputs redefined as outputs. Parameters (J=0.4, shallow EF≃5.3 meV, ζ, λ, Δ/Γ) are phenomenological choices guided by literature estimates (Appendix G), not fits to external STS data that are then re-predicted. Prior impurity/altermagnet citations [26–30] and path-integral/Green’s-function references are background, not uniqueness theorems or load-bearing self-citations that force the dual-Fano or nodal-contrast claims. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or renamed empirical pattern is present. Score 0 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a standard non-interacting resonant-level model plus continuum d-wave altermagnet dispersion, contact hybridization, and a phenomenological shallow-pocket parameter set. No new particles or forces are introduced; free parameters are illustrative choices within a regime argued to be STM-accessible.

free parameters (6)
  • J (altermagnetic splitting) = 0.4
    Set to 0.4 by hand as a representative value inside the stable J<1 window; used for all numerical figures and period-extraction formulas.
  • EF / shallow-pocket scale = ~5.3 meV
    Chosen ~5.3 meV (with kF^{-1}~3.8 nm) so that real-space patterns are STM-accessible and Landau filling factors remain moderate at laboratory B fields (Appendix G).
  • ζ (Landau filling) = 5 / 5.4
    Illustrative values ζ=5 or 5.4 used to place EF between Landau levels and to demonstrate nodal structure and Λ(ζ).
  • λ (direct tip-impurity strength) = 0 / 0.34
    Dimensionless ratio of direct to substrate-mediated tunneling; scanned or set to specific values (e.g. 0.34) to realize interference zeros.
  • Δ/Γ (impurity detuning) = 0 (typical)
    Swept through resonance to generate Fano line shapes and to optimize spin polarization; set to 0 for many spatial maps.
  • η (broadening) = 10^{-3} EF
    Phenomenological; set to 10^{-3} EF so that Landau levels are resolved (ℋω_L/η~200).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Non-interacting resonant-level Hamiltonian with contact impurity-substrate hybridization and isotropic tip/impurity orbitals.
    Eqs. (1)–(10); standard for Fano/STM impurity models but neglects multi-orbital and interaction effects present in real altermagnets.
  • domain assumption Continuum single-pocket d-wave dispersion ε_kσ = (ℋ^{2}/2m)(k_x^{2} + k_y^{2} + 2σ J k_x k_y) with J<1.
    Eq. (4) and Fig. 1; phenomenological continuum limit of altermagnetic band structure.
  • domain assumption Substrate Zeeman splitting may be neglected while impurity Zeeman is retained, away from Landau-level resonances.
    Stated in Sec. II and justified in Appendix D by scale separation between substrate and impurity linewidth.
  • standard math Ultraviolet divergence of the 2D coincident-point Green’s function is absorbed into a renormalized impurity level ξ via short-distance cutoff a.
    Appendix D; standard regularization for 2D contact impurities.
  • domain assumption Open-path Peierls phases cancel in the contact geometry so that gauge-invariant Aharonov-Bohm phases do not appear in N_σ.
    Sec. II and Appendix B; geometry-specific phase convention.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resonant-impurity scanning tunneling spectroscopy in altermagnets: dual Fano resonance and Landau-quantization-induced nodal spin contrast." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6G24BPE6

@misc{pith2026260706885,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resonant-impurity scanning tunneling spectroscopy in altermagnets: dual Fano resonance and Landau-quantization-induced nodal spin contrast},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6G24BPE6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06885}
}
abstract

Using a Green's-function formalism, we study the spin-resolved local spectral function of a resonant impurity coupled to a two-dimensional $d$% -wave altermagnetic substrate. It is found that the interplay between direct tunneling from the impurity to the scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) tip and altermagnet-mediated tunneling gives rise to a dual Fano resonance in the absence of an external magnetic field. Moreover, the anisotropic spin-dependent oscillations of the local density of states and the corresponding Fano factors provide information on the altermagnetic splitting strength from complementary local and global perspectives. In addition, spin-selective tunneling can be achieved by tuning the Fermi energy and the tip position. In the presence of a strong magnetic field with Landau-level quantization, the dominant scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) signature appears as a spin-dependent nodal structure in real space: the nodal mismatch between opposite spin channels produces a large local spin contrast. These results establish resonant-impurity STM/STS as a phase-sensitive local probe of altermagnetic band anisotropy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06885 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Schematic illustration of the STM/STS setup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a)–(c) Spin-up, spin-down, and total local spectral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a), (b) Spin-up and spin-down local spectral functions as functions of the tip-impurity separation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a), (b) Spin-up and spin-down local spectral functions as functions of the direct tunneling parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a)–(c) Logarithm of the spin-up, spin-down, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a)–(c) Logarithm of the spin-up, spin-down, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) Dimensionless impurity-level shift Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) Dimensionless impurity-level shift Λ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Phase of the dimensionless substrate Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    I. I. Mazin, Physical Review X12, 040002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Zeng and Y.-J

    S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Physical Review B110, 054406 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Physical Review Letters126, 127701 (2021). 19

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 011028 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Feng, Y. Zhou, Q. Wang, W. Zhu, X. Chen, F. Pan, X. Fan, and C. Song, Physical Review Letters128, 197202 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Physical Review Letters129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub´ aˇ c, R. J. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, G. Springholz, K. Olejn´ ık, L.ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, et al., Physical Review Letters130, 036702 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Physical Review Letters 132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Physical Review B110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Krempask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S

    J. Krempask´ y, L.ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. N. Strocov, D. Usanov, et al., Nature626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. ˇSmejkal, et al., Physical Review Letters132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Physical Review B109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, et al., Nature Communications15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Y.-P. Zhu, X. Chen, X.-R. Liu, Y. Liu, P. Liu, H. Zha, G. Qu, C. Hong, J. Li, Z. Jiang, et al., Nature626, 523 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, et al., Nature Physics21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, et al., Nature Physics 21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Reichlov´ a, R

    H. Reichlov´ a, R. Lopes Seeger, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, I. Kounta, et al., Nature Communications15, 4961 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Badura, W

    A. Badura, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, I. Kounta, L. Michez, M. Petit, J. Rial, M. Leivisk¨ a, V. Baltz, F. Krizek, et al., Nature Communications16, 7111 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Tersoff and D

    J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Physical Review Letters 50, 1998 (1983)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Tersoff and D

    J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Physical Review B31, 805 (1985)

    1985

  14. [22]

    Friedel, Philosophical Magazine43, 153 (1952)

    J. Friedel, Philosophical Magazine43, 153 (1952)

    1952

  15. [23]

    M. F. Crommie, C. P. Lutz, and D. M. Eigler, Nature 363, 524 (1993)

    1993

  16. [24]

    Hasegawa and P

    Y. Hasegawa and P. Avouris, Physical Review Letters 71, 1071 (1993)

    1993

  17. [25]

    P. T. Sprunger, L. Petersen, E. W. Plummer, E. Lægs- gaard, and F. Besenbacher, Science275, 1764 (1997)

    1997

  18. [26]

    W. Chen, X. Zhou, D. Zhang, Y.-Q. Xu, and W.-K. Lou, Physical Review B110, 165413 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Sukhachov and J

    P. Sukhachov and J. Linder, Physical Review B110, 205114 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    H.-R. Hu, X. Wan, and W. Chen, Physical Review B 111, 035132 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Gondolf, A

    J. Gondolf, A. Kreisel, M. Roig, Y. Yu, D. F. Agterberg, and B. M. Andersen, Physical Review B111, 174436 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Maiani and R

    A. Maiani and R. Seoane Souto, Physical Review B111, 224506 (2025)

    2025

  23. [31]

    Fano, Physical Review124, 1866 (1961)

    U. Fano, Physical Review124, 1866 (1961)

    1961

  24. [32]

    Madhavan, W

    V. Madhavan, W. Chen, T. Jamneala, M. F. Crommie, and N. S. Wingreen, Science280, 567 (1998)

    1998

  25. [33]

    Schiller and S

    A. Schiller and S. Hershfield, Physical Review B61, 9036 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    ´Ujs´ aghy, J

    O. ´Ujs´ aghy, J. Kroha, L. Szunyogh, and A. Zawadowski, Physical Review Letters85, 2557 (2000)

    2000

  27. [35]

    Plihal and J

    M. Plihal and J. W. Gadzuk, Physical Review B63, 085404 (2001)

    2001

  28. [36]

    Knorr, M

    N. Knorr, M. A. Schneider, L. Diekh¨ oner, P. Wahl, and K. Kern, Physical review letters88, 096804 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Terashima, Y

    T. Terashima, Y. Hattori, D. Graf, T. Urata, T. Yosh- ioka, W. Hattori, H. Ikuta, and H. Ikeda, arXiv e-prints (2026), 2601.19105

    2026

  30. [38]

    Z. Wu, M. Long, H. Chen, S. Paul, H. Matsuki, O. Zhe- liuk, U. Zeitler, G. Li, R. Zhou, Z. Zhu, et al., Physical Review X15, 031044 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Ezawa, Physical Review B113, 155303 (2026)

    M. Ezawa, Physical Review B113, 155303 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    T. M. Rusin and W. Zawadzki, Physical Review B97, 205410 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Kleinert,Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009), 5th ed

    H. Kleinert,Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, Polymer Physics, and Financial Markets (World Scientific, Singapore, 2009), 5th ed

    2009

  35. [43]

    D. K. Morr, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 014502 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    J. R. Taylor,Scattering theory: the quantum theory of nonrelativistic collisions(Courier Corporation, 2012)

    2012

  37. [45]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, et al., Nature Communications 16, 1442 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.