Room-temperature inversionless diamond nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin maser

Ali Fawaz; Sarath Raman Nair

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 46 references

Room-temperature inversionless diamond nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin maser

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Diamond maser without strong magnets or population inversion

desk verdict Solid theoretical proposal for inversionless NV maser at 5 mT; main gap is unaddressed inhomogeneous broadening read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07124 v1 pith:P76LFQZF submitted 2026-07-08 quant-ph

Ali Fawaz , Sarath Raman Nair This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords masernitrogen-vacancycenterdiamondinversionlesslasingroomtemperaturequantumsensingmagnetometercoherenceinterference

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conventional diamond masers require strong bias magnetic fields (hundreds of milli-Tesla) to achieve population inversion, making them bulky. This paper proposes a room-temperature maser at ~2.9 GHz using diamond nitrogen-vacancy (NV) electronic spins that needs only a ~5 mT transverse field and no population inversion. The mechanism exploits a transverse magnetic field that mixes the NV spin's ground-state levels into superpositions, opening all three ground-state transitions. Two transitions are driven by microwave and radio-frequency fields, creating quantum coherences whose interference suppresses stimulated absorption on the third transition while preserving stimulated emission into a microwave resonator. Numerical modeling with experimentally realistic parameters (1.1×10^14 spins, 130 kHz resonator linewidth, 330 kHz spin dephasing) predicts ~3.7×10^9 photons in the resonator, corresponding to ~1 nW output power. The second-order coherence g^(2)(0) transitions from 2 (thermal) to 1 (coherent), confirming the masing threshold is crossed. The authors further show that the maser's output intensity responds to small changes in the external magnetic field, enabling a magnetometer with sensitivity on the order of 100 pT/√Hz.

What carries the argument

The mechanism rests on three components: (1) a transverse magnetic field Bx ≈ 5 mT that creates superposition eigenstates of the NV ground-state triplet, enabling all three transitions to be individually addressed; (2) near-resonant microwave and RF drives on two of the three transitions, generating spin coherences whose interference suppresses stimulated absorption on the third; (3) a microwave resonator coupled to the third transition that collects the net stimulated emission. The gain parameter G (Eq. 12) contains a conventional inversion-dependent term plus two coherence-interference terms from the MW and RF drives, and the latter terms can make G positive even when population inversion,

What would settle it

If the coherence-interference terms in the gain expression (Eq. 12) are suppressed or reversed by higher-order spin-photon correlations not captured by the first-order mean-field approximation, the net gain G could fail to exceed the loss threshold, and no masing phase transition would occur. Experimentally, the cleanest falsification would be to build the proposed device and observe that g^(2)(0) remains at 2 (thermal) rather than transitioning to 1 (coherent) at the predicted driving parameters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that inversionless masing in diamond NV spins can be achieved at room temperature with a weak (~5 mT) transverse bias field by using two driven ground-state transitions to create coherence interference that suppresses absorption on the third transition, which is coupled to a microwave resonator. This eliminates the need for both population inversion and strong bias magnets required by conventional diamond NV masers.

Load-bearing premise

The model closes its equations of motion by assuming that correlations between the resonator photon field and individual spin operators factorize into products of their averages (a first-order mean-field approximation), even though the collective spin-photon cooperativity is only about 3, which is not large enough to guarantee this factorization is accurate. If higher-order correlations significantly renormalize the coherence-interference terms that drive the gain, the masing

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If experimentally realized, this would yield a compact, room-temperature maser operating near 2.9 GHz without heavy permanent magnets or electromagnets, reducing the maser device footprint from tens of kilograms to a small permanent magnet or coil.
The maser output intensity varies with external magnetic field perturbations along the transverse axis, enabling a diamond magnetometer with ~100 pT/√Hz sensitivity at room temperature, which could be useful in unshielded or portable sensing scenarios.
The inversionless gain mechanism via coherence interference is not specific to NV spins and could potentially be adapted to other solid-state spin ensembles with similar ground-state triplet structures.
The elimination of strong bias fields simplifies integration with other quantum technologies on diamond platforms, such as quantum sensing networks or hybrid spin-photon interfaces.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The coherence-interference gain mechanism may be tunable in frequency by adjusting Bx, since the transition frequencies depend on the transverse field, potentially allowing a compact tunable maser source in the 2.87–2.90 GHz range.
If the first-order mean-field approximation underestimates gain (as the second-order calculations suggest slightly improved sensitivity), the actual masing threshold and output power could be more favorable than predicted, though the reverse is also possible if higher-order correlations suppress the coherence terms.
The sensitivity of the gain to the ratio of MW and RF driving strengths (evident from the photon-number minimum along the red dashed line in Fig. 2a) suggests that the device could also function as a microwave mixer or parametric amplifier, not just a maser.
Operating at only 5 mT bias means the device could use small, mass-produced permanent magnets or even on-chip current-carrying wires, potentially enabling wafer-scale arrays of independent maser magnetometers.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The headline: Fawaz and Nair propose a room-temperature diamond NV maser that needs only ~5 mT bias instead of the hundreds of mT conventional NV masers require, by using inversionless gain via dual MW/RF driving of a three-level ground-state manifold. The core idea is sound and the execution is mostly clean, but the paper sidesteps inhomogeneous broadening, which is the one thing that could actually kill the gain mechanism in practice. It deserves a serious referee who pushes on that point. What's genuinely new: applying lasing-without-inversion (Harris 1989, Mompart & Corbalán 2000) to NV electronic spins alone, without the hyperfine-coupled nuclear spins that Wang et al. 2025 required. The trick is a transverse field that mixes |±1⟩ into superposition states, opening up all three ground-state transitions for driving. The gain expression (Eq. 12) cleanly separates the conventional inversion term from the coherence-interference terms, and you can see exactly where the physics lives. They ship reproducible Julia code, derive the Hamiltonian from scratch in the supplement, and pull all physical parameters from independent experiments. The second-order cumulant check (75 equations) agreeing with first-order mean-field for photon number and g^(2)(0) is reassuring, though not a rigorous proof that the closure is valid. The soft spot is real and the stress-test note lands it correctly. For N = 10^14 spins, inhomogeneous broadening is unavoidable — typically 1–10 MHz for dense NV ensembles. The |2⟩↔|3⟩ splitting is only 7 MHz at 5 mT, so the RF drive is operating in a regime where ensemble averaging could wash out the very coherences that produce gain. The cooperativity C ≈ 3 uses homogeneous Γ = 330 kHz; replacing it with an inhomogeneous Γ* would likely drop C below threshold. The authors acknowledge this in the supplement as 'beyond scope' but don't estimate the damage. That said, this is a theoretical proposal, not an experimental claim, and many NV maser theory papers make similar idealizations. The idea is worth testing experimentally. Recommend accepting for peer review with a request that the authors at least estimate how inhomogeneous broadening would affect the gain and threshold.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes a room-temperature inversionless maser using an ensemble of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV) electronic spins in diamond. The key idea is to apply a small (~5 mT) transverse DC magnetic field to create superposition states of the |m_s = ±1⟩ levels, enabling all three ground-state transitions to be driven independently. Two transitions are driven by microwave (MW) and radio-frequency (RF) fields, while the third couples to a microwave resonator. The interference of spin coherences generated by the MW and RF drives is used to suppress stimulated absorption on the resonator-coupled transition, achieving masing without population inversion. The authors derive the Hamiltonian, write down the equations of motion using a first-order mean-field approximation, and verify key results against second-order cumulant equations. They predict ~3.7×10^9 photons at experimentally realizable parameters and demonstrate a potential magnetometry application with ~100 pT/√Hz sensitivity. The approach is novel in eliminating the need for the strong bias magnetic field (~200–400 mT) required by conventional NV masers.

Significance. The proposal is timely and addresses a genuine practical limitation of existing diamond NV masers — the need for bulky permanent magnets or electromagnets. The Hamiltonian derivation (Supplementary S.I) is clean and self-contained, the gain expression (Eq. 12) transparently separates conventional inversion gain from coherence-mediated terms, and all physical parameters are drawn from independent experimental literature rather than being fitted. The inclusion of reproducible Julia code (Supplementary S.V) and the second-order cumulant cross-check (Fig. 2b) are commendable and strengthen the work. The magnetometry application, while not competitive with the SQL, is a reasonable demonstration of utility. The central concern is whether the idealized model — particularly the neglect of inhomogeneous broadening — is adequate to support the claim that masing is achievable with experimentally realizable parameters.

major comments (2)

The most significant concern is the neglect of inhomogeneous broadening, which is unavoidable for an ensemble of N = 1.1×10^14 NV spins. The gain mechanism depends on coherence interference terms in Eq. (12) (lines 2–3), which are phase-sensitive and would be degraded by averaging over a distribution of transition frequencies. This is especially critical for the |2⟩↔|3⟩ transition, whose splitting is only 7 MHz at B_x = 5 mT — comparable to typical inhomogeneous linewidths (~1–10 MHz) for dense NV ensembles. The cooperativity C = 4g²_x N/(κ_x Γ) ≈ 3 uses the homogeneous Γ/2π = 330 kHz; replacing it with an effective Γ* >> Γ would drop C well below 1, likely below threshold. The authors acknowledge this in the Supplementary ('lies beyond the scope of the present work') but do not estimate its impact. A quantitative or even semi-quantitative estimate of how inhomogeneous broadening would (
The second-order cumulant verification (Fig. 2b) validates the mean-field closure for identical spins, but it does not address the regime where inhomogeneous broadening is the dominant decoherence mechanism. Since the entire gain mechanism relies on the weak-correlation approximation ⟨â†σ₁₃⟩ ≈ ⟨â†⟩⟨σ₁₃⟩, and the cooperativity C ≈ 3 is not large, it would strengthen the paper to discuss whether the second-order check remains adequate when Γ is replaced by a larger effective linewidth, or whether higher-order correlations become important in that regime.

minor comments (6)

The sensitivity formula η_B = √(k_B T n_x)/(√(ℏω_x κ_x |R_0|)) is stated without explicit derivation in the main text; the reader is referred to [39]. A brief derivation or at least a clearer statement of assumptions (e.g., Johnson-Nyquist noise floor, detection efficiency) would improve accessibility. Also, the temperature T used in Fig. 3(b) should be stated explicitly.
In Eq. (12), the symbol ξ is defined as Γ + (3/2)γ_l + Λ, but the detuning parameter Δ̃ = Δ_13/ξ is used without clarifying that Δ_13 here refers to the detuning in the rotated frame. This should be clarified for the reader.
The Fano factor discussion in Supplementary S.II mentions that no distinguishable peak is observed, but the physical implications are not discussed. A brief comment on why the expected peak is absent would help.
Fig. 2(a): The red dashed line indicating the minimum n_x region is mentioned but the physical origin (cancellation of coherence contributions, explained in Supplementary S.VI) should be briefly noted in the main text figure caption.
The paper states that the phase-invariant condition does not hold because the photon operator phase is influenced by MW and RF drives. It would help to briefly explain the physical reason why external drives break phase invariance.
Reference [20] is cited extensively for supplementary material but is listed as 'Supplementary information for...' in the reference list. Consider using a consistent label like 'Supplemental Material' throughout.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: derivation is self-contained with externally sourced parameters

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained at every step. The Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) is derived from the standard NV spin Hamiltonian via diagonalization and rotating-frame transformation (Supplementary S.I.), with no self-referential definitions. The equations of motion (Eqs. 2–11) follow from the Lindblad master equation with standard mean-field factorization. The gain expression (Eq. 12) is obtained algebraically from Eq. (3) at steady state — it is not defined in terms of the quantity it claims to predict. All physical parameters (g/2π=18 mHz, N=1.1×10¹⁴, κx/2π=130 kHz, Γ/2π=330 kHz, γl/2π=200 Hz, optical rates) are taken from independent experimental literature by other groups ([13], [25], [32], [33]). The numerical results (photon numbers, g⁽²⁾(0), sensitivity) are genuine outputs of solving the stated equations, not fits to data. The sensitivity formula uses the standard Johnson-Nyquist expression from [39]. The second-order correlation check (75 equations) serves as an independent verification of the mean-field closure, not as circular reasoning. No load-bearing self-citations exist. The mean-field approximation is an unverified assumption (a correctness risk, not circularity), and the authors address it by comparison with second-order equations. No step in the derivation reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, or forces. All components (NV spins, microwave resonator, MW/RF drives, optical pump) are standard experimental elements. The contribution is the specific configuration and driving scheme, not new physics objects.

free parameters (5)

Λ (optical pump rate) = 0–1000 Hz (scanned)
Treated as a free parameter within experimentally achievable range; not fitted to data but scanned to find optimal operating points.
Ω_y (MW drive strength) = 0–10 MHz (scanned), optimal ~18–33.5 kHz
Free parameter scanned numerically; chosen to maximize photon number or sensitivity.
Ω_z (RF drive strength) = 0–10 MHz (scanned), optimal ~500–628 kHz
Free parameter scanned numerically; chosen to maximize photon number or sensitivity.
B_x (transverse bias field) = 5 mT
Chosen to satisfy γ_e B_x ≪ D while creating resolvable level splitting; not fitted but a design choice.
N (number of spins) = 1.1×10^14
Taken from experimental reference [32]; not a free parameter of the model but an input assumption.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption γ_e B_x ≪ D, so that the transverse field only mixes |±1⟩ states without significantly perturbing the |0⟩ state or optical dynamics
Stated in the Model section; for B_x = 5 mT, γ_e B_x ≈ 140 MHz ≪ D ≈ 2.87 GHz, so the approximation is well-justified.
domain assumption Strain-field effects are negligible (frequencies on order of few hundred kHz or lower)
Stated in the Model section; validity depends on the specific diamond sample used. Not all NV ensembles satisfy this.
ad hoc to paper Weak correlation approximation: ⟨â†σ₁₃⟩ ≈ ⟨â†⟩⟨σ₁₃⟩ etc. is valid for closing the EoM at first order
Used to derive Eqs. (2)–(11). Justified partially by cooperativity C ≈ 3 and by comparison with second-order equations, but the approximation's validity for the gain mechanism specifically is not rigorously established.
domain assumption All NV spins are identical and identically coupled (⟨σ^(i)_αβ⟩ = ⟨σ^(k)_αβ⟩)
Stated in the Numerical estimation section; ignores inhomogeneous broadening and spatial variation in coupling strength across the ensemble.
domain assumption Inter-system crossing and optical transition rates are symmetric for |m_s = ±1⟩ states
Stated in the Model section, referencing [13, 25]; this is a standard simplification in NV modeling.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Room-temperature inversionless diamond nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin maser." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P76LFQZF

@misc{pith2026260707124,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Room-temperature inversionless diamond nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin maser},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P76LFQZF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07124}
}

abstract

We propose a method to create a room-temperature maser operating at approximately 2.9~GHz frequency using an ensemble of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy electronic spins (NV) in diamond, without requiring population inversion. Our method considers a DC magnetic field of a few milli-Tesla (mT) applied along the perpendicular direction of an ensemble of NV spins aligned along a common axis. This perpendicular magnetic-field creates superposition states of $|m_{\mathrm{s}}=-1\rangle$ and $|m_{\mathrm{s}}=+1\rangle$ of the NV spin's ground state triplet levels and thereby makes it possible to drive all three transitions in the NV spin ground state. We model the system by including optical pumping of the NV spins, near-resonant driving of two transitions, and coupling the third transition to a near-resonant microwave resonator. Numerical estimates using experimentally realizable parameters show that inversionless masing can be achieved inside the microwave resonator using our method. As an application, we show that the output intensity of an inversionless maser ($1.1\times10^{14}$ spins) can be used for magnetic field sensing with a DC sensitivity on the order of a hundred pT/$\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$. Our study opens a new direction in room-temperature diamond NV maser devices for quantum technological applications without the requirement of a strong bias magnetic field, as in conventional NV diamond masers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.07124 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Magnetic field sensing. (a) Photon number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

[1]

L. Jin, M. Pfender, N. Aslam, P. Neumann, S. Yang, J. Wrachtrup, and R.-B. Liu, Nature Communications6, 8251 (2015)

work page 2015
[2]

J. D. Breeze, E. Salvadori, J. Sathian, N. M. Alford, and C. W. Kay, Nature555, 493 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

C. W. Zollitsch, S. Ruloff, Y. Fett, H. T. Wiedemann, R. Richter, J. D. Breeze, and C. W. Kay, Communica- tions Physics6, 295 (2023)

work page 2023
[4]

Sherman, O

A. Sherman, O. Zgadzai, B. Koren, I. Peretz, E. Laster, and A. Blank, Science Advances8, eade6527 (2022)

work page 2022
[5]

T. Day, M. Isarov, W. J. Pappas, B. C. Johnson, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, D. R. McCamey, A. Laucht, and J. J. Pla, Physical Review X14, 041066 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

W. Ng, Y. Wen, N. M. Alford, and D. M. Arroo, Physical Review Applied23, 054064 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

D. M. Arroo, N. M. Alford, and J. D. Breeze, Applied Physics Letters119, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061330 (2021)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0061330 2021
[8]

S. E. Harris, Physical review letters62, 1033 (1989)

work page 1989

Show all 46 references

[9]

Mompart and R

J. Mompart and R. Corbalan, Journal of Optics B: Quan- tum and Semiclassical Optics2, R7 (2000)

2000
[10]

H. Wu, S. Yang, M. Oxborrow, M. Jiang, Q. Zhao, D. Budker, B. Zhang, and J. Du, Science advances8, eade1613 (2022)

2022
[11]

Jeske, J

J. Jeske, J. H. Cole, and A. D. Greentree, New Journal of Physics18, 013015 (2016)

2016
[13]

J. P. Tetienne, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, M. Chipaux, T. Debuisschert, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, New Jour- nal of Physics14, 103033 (2012)

2012
[14]

Lamba, A

P. Lamba, A. Rana, S. Halder, S. Dhomkar, D. Suter, and R. K. Kamineni, Physical Review B109, 195424 (2024)

2024
[15]

Matsuzaki, H

Y. Matsuzaki, H. Morishita, T. Shimooka, T. Tashima, K. Kakuyanagi, K. Semba, W. Munro, H. Yamaguchi, N. Mizuochi, and S. Saito, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter28, 275302 (2016)

2016
[16]

Saijo, Y

S. Saijo, Y. Matsuzaki, S. Saito, T. Yamaguchi, I. Hanano, H. Watanabe, N. Mizuochi, and J. Ishi-Hayase, Applied Physics Letters113, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5024401 (2018)

2018 doi
[17]

Yamaguchi, Y

T. Yamaguchi, Y. Matsuzaki, S. Saito, S. Saijo, H. Watanabe, N. Mizuochi, and J. Ishi-Hayase, Japanese journal of applied physics58, 100901 (2019)

2019
[18]

Tabuchi, Y

H. Tabuchi, Y. Matsuzaki, N. Furuya, Y. Nakano, H. Watanabe, N. Tokuda, N. Mizuochi, and J. Ishi-Hayase, Journal of Applied Physics133, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0129706 (2023)

2023 doi
[19]

Mikawa, R

T. Mikawa, R. Okaniwa, Y. Matsuzaki, N. Tokuda, and J. Ishi-Hayase, Physical Review A108, 012610 (2023)

2023
[20]

Supplementary information for ‘Room-temperature in- versionless diamond nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin maser’
[21]

Gruber, A

A. Gruber, A. Drabenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, and C. v. Borczyskowski, Science276, 2012 (1997)

2012
[22]

C. S. Shin, C. E. Avalos, M. C. Butler, H.-J. Wang, S. J. Seltzer, R.-B. Liu, A. Pines, and V. S. Bajaj, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics88, 161412 (2013)

2013
[23]

M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, and L. C. Hollenberg, New Journal of Physics13, 025019 (2011)

2011
[24]

M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013)

2013
[26]

Rogers, S

L. Rogers, S. Armstrong, M. Sellars, and N. Manson, New Journal of Physics10, 103024 (2008)

2008
[27]

Acosta, A

V. Acosta, A. Jarmola, E. Bauch, and D. Budker, Physi- cal Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 82, 201202 (2010)

2010
[28]

Zhang, Q

Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, S.-L. Su, Q. Lou, C. Shan, and K. Mølmer, Physical review letters128, 253601 (2022)

2022
[29]

Zhang, Q

Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, H. Wu, X. Yang, S.-L. Su, C. Shan, and K. Mølmer, npj Quantum Information8, 125 (2022)

2022
[30]

Plankensteiner, C

D. Plankensteiner, C. Hotter, and H. Ritsch, Quantum 6, 617 (2022)

2022
[32]

H. Wang, K. L. Tiwari, K. Jacobs, M. Judy, X. Zhang, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Nature Communi- cations15, 10320 (2024)

2024
[34]

Bayat, J

K. Bayat, J. Choy, M. Farrokh Baroughi, S. Meesala, and M. Loncar, Nano letters14, 1208 (2014). 6

2014
[35]

Yaroshenko, V

V. Yaroshenko, V. Soshenko, V. Vorobyov, S. Bolshed- vorskii, E. Nenasheva, I. Kotel’nikov, A. Akimov, and P. Kapitanova, Review of Scientific Instruments91, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5129863 (2020)

2020 doi
[36]

O. R. Opaluch, N. Oshnik, R. Nelz, and E. Neu, Nano- materials11, 2108 (2021)

2021
[37]

Ben-Shalom, A

Y. Ben-Shalom, A. Hen, and N. Bar-Gill, IEEE Sensors Journal24, 20420 (2024)

2024
[38]

Rezinkin, M

O. Rezinkin, M. Rezinkina, T. Kitamura, R. Paul, and F. Jelezko, Review of Scientific Instruments95, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0203162 (2024)

2024 doi
[39]

E. R. Eisenach, J. F. Barry, M. F. O’Keeffe, J. M. Schloss, M. H. Steinecker, D. R. Englund, and D. A. Braje, Nature communications12, 1357 (2021). Supplementary information for ‘Room-temperature inversionless diamond nitrogen-vacancy electronic spin maser’ Ali Fawaz 1 and Sar...

2021
[40]

N∆_{12}∆_{23}Ω_yΩ_zγ_lΓ Λγ_{14}γ_{25}γ_{36}γ_{74}γ_{75}γ_{76} γ_{17}γ_{27}γ_{37}

The diagonal basis then consists of the three states|−⟩,|λ +⟩= cos(θ)|+⟩+sin(θ)|0⟩ and|λ −⟩=−sin(θ)|+⟩+ cos(θ)|0⟩with tan(2θ) = 2γ eBx/D. Assumingγ eBx ≪Dthen cos(θ)≈1 and sin(θ)≈0: ˆHN V =λ + |+⟩ ⟨+|+λ − |0⟩ ⟨0|+D|−⟩ ⟨−|(S.I.4) The lowest energy state is|0⟩with energyλ −, and...

2000
[41]

J. P. Tetienne, L. Rondin, P. Spinicelli, M. Chipaux, T. Debuisschert, J.-F. Roch, and V. Jacques, New Journal of Physics 14, 103033 (2012)

2012
[42]

Kubo, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

R. Kubo, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan17, 1100 (1962)

1962
[43]

Plankensteiner, C

D. Plankensteiner, C. Hotter, and H. Ritsch, Quantum6, 617 (2022)

2022
[44]

Weedbrook, S

C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro, and S. Lloyd, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 621 (2012)

2012
[45]

Werren, E

N. Werren, E. M. Gauger, and P. Kirton, New Journal of Physics24, 093027 (2022)

2022
[46]

P. R. Rice and H. J. Carmichael, Phys. Rev. A50, 4318 (1994)

1994
[47]

Saldutti, Y

M. Saldutti, Y. Yu, and J. Mørk, Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2300840 (2024)

2024
[48]

Gupta, L

A. Gupta, L. Hacquebard, and L. Childress, Journal of the Optical Society of America B33, B28 (2016)

2016
[49]

H. Wang, S. Wu, K. Jacobs, Y. Duan, D. R. Englund, and M. E. Trusheim, Physical Review Letters134, 183603 (2025)

2025
[50]

Jarmola, V

A. Jarmola, V. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker, Physical review letters108, 197601 (2012)

2012

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

L. Jin, M. Pfender, N. Aslam, P. Neumann, S. Yang, J. Wrachtrup, and R.-B. Liu, Nature Communications6, 8251 (2015)

work page 2015

[2] [2]

J. D. Breeze, E. Salvadori, J. Sathian, N. M. Alford, and C. W. Kay, Nature555, 493 (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

C. W. Zollitsch, S. Ruloff, Y. Fett, H. T. Wiedemann, R. Richter, J. D. Breeze, and C. W. Kay, Communica- tions Physics6, 295 (2023)

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Sherman, O

A. Sherman, O. Zgadzai, B. Koren, I. Peretz, E. Laster, and A. Blank, Science Advances8, eade6527 (2022)

work page 2022

[5] [5]

T. Day, M. Isarov, W. J. Pappas, B. C. Johnson, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, D. R. McCamey, A. Laucht, and J. J. Pla, Physical Review X14, 041066 (2024)

work page 2024

[6] [6]

W. Ng, Y. Wen, N. M. Alford, and D. M. Arroo, Physical Review Applied23, 054064 (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

D. M. Arroo, N. M. Alford, and J. D. Breeze, Applied Physics Letters119, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0061330 (2021)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0061330 2021

[8] [8]

S. E. Harris, Physical review letters62, 1033 (1989)

work page 1989