Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 77 references

A Topotactic Phase Transition in the Uranium Oxide System

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Pith's one-line read Uranium oxide flips between two crystal forms, swelling 36% without breaking

desk verdict Solid experimental demonstration of a reversible topotactic UO2→U3O8 transition; substrate-independence claim is under-supported but secondary read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07291 v1 pith:QJ2SOTTG submitted 2026-07-08 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords topotacticphasetransitionuraniumoxideUO2U3O8epitaxialthinfilmoxidationmechanismnuclearfuelcrystallographicorientationrelationship
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that when a thin film of uranium dioxide (UO2) is cut so that its (001) crystal face points upward, it can transform into a different uranium oxide (U3O8) in a topotactic manner: the parent crystal's orientation dictates the daughter crystal's orientation, and the two share a defined geometric relationship (a 45-degree rotation in-plane, with two possible domains 90 degrees apart). This transformation involves a 36% volume expansion, yet the film does not crack or disintegrate, unlike films cut along other crystal directions. The process is also reversible: reducing the oxidised film back to UO2 recovers the original crystal structure. The authors argue this specific orientation relationship, not the previously assumed (111)-plane mechanism, governs the UO2-to-U3O8 oxidation, solving a long-standing puzzle about how nuclear fuel oxidises. The method uses epitaxial thin films on single-crystal substrates to expose the transformation mechanism in a controlled, two-dimensional geometry.

What carries the argument

The experimental method grows single-crystal UO2 thin films in three principal orientations on substrates, then oxidises them in situ while monitoring with X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy. For the (001)-oriented film, X-ray phi-scans reveal the epitaxial relationship between parent and daughter structures. The coexistence of both phases during oxidation, confirmed by time-resolved diffraction, demonstrates that the transformation proceeds along the growth direction. Rocking-curve broadening and SEM imaging reveal two types of domain boundaries consistent with the proposed structural model.

What would settle it

If the same (001)-to-(130) orientation relationship and strain accommodation without spallation are not observed when UO2 is grown on a substrate with a very different lattice constant or crystal symmetry, the substrate-independence claim would be undermined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a specific, reversible topotactic orientation relationship: (001) cubic UO2 transforms to (130) orthorhombic U3O8 with a 45-degree in-plane rotation, accommodating a 36% volume expansion without loss of crystalline integrity. This contradicts the decades-old assumption that the transformation propagates along the close-packed (111) planes of UO2.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the transformation is substrate-independent rests mainly on strain calculations favouring the UO2-U3O8 interface over the substrate-U3O8 interface, plus a brief mention that the same transition occurs on a second substrate (CaF2) shown only in supplementary material without the same X-ray rigour applied to the main data.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nuclear fuel oxidation models that assume (111)-plane propagation must be revised to account for the (001)-to-(130) topotactic pathway, affecting predictions of fuel degradation during storage and non-standard reactor conditions.
  • The thin-film polyepitaxial method can be applied to other oxide systems where bulk powder studies have failed to resolve transformation mechanisms, particularly where large volume changes accompany redox reactions.
  • Reversible topotactic transitions with 36% volume change and preserved crystallinity could be exploited in functional devices such as resistive switching memories or sensors, where structural changes under redox cycling are the operating principle.
  • The domain-formation model (two domain orientations plus intra-domain shift defects) provides a template for predicting defect structures in other topotactic transformations between cubic and orthorhombic systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transformation is genuinely substrate-independent, then bulk UO2 grains with (001) surfaces exposed should also transform to (130) U3O8 without spallation, which could be tested by oxidising oriented bulk single crystals rather than thin films.
  • The reversibility without obvious integrity loss raises the question of fatigue: repeated oxidation-reduction cycles may accumulate defects (domain walls, mosaic spread) that eventually degrade crystallinity, analogous to fatigue in ferroelectric switching. This is testable by cycling the film multiple times and tracking rocking-curve width.
  • The observation that (001) surfaces accommodate strain without fragmentation while (111) surfaces spallate suggests that surface morphology evolution during oxidation, and therefore dissolution kinetics of spent fuel, may be tunable by controlling which crystal faces are exposed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a reversible topotactic phase transition from (001) cubic UO2 to (130) orthorhombic U3O8 in epitaxial thin films, observed via in-situ XRD and HT-ESEM. The authors demonstrate that [001]-oriented UO2 films on YSZ substrates can accommodate the ~36% volume expansion associated with oxidation to U3O8 without loss of structural integrity, in contrast to [111] and [110] orientations which spallate. The epitaxial relationship is established by phi-scans showing a 45-degree separation angle and two domains rotated by 90 degrees. The transformation is shown to be reversible by reduction back to UO2 under hydrogen. The methodology is based on polyepitaxial thin film growth and is proposed as a general approach for studying crystallographic transformation mechanisms.

Significance. The paper addresses a long-standing puzzle in the uranium oxide system: the detailed mechanism of the UO2 to U3O8 transformation, which is relevant to nuclear fuel performance and spent fuel storage. The key strengths are: (1) the in-situ XRD evidence (Fig. 2B) showing phase coexistence and gradual replacement, which is the most direct evidence for a topotactic mechanism; (2) the phi-scan data (Fig. 3A) establishing a well-defined epitaxial relationship with a 45-degree separation angle; (3) the orientation-dependent integrity observation ([001] survives while [111]/[110] spallate), which is strong evidence against the previously accepted 111-mediated mechanism; and (4) the reversibility demonstration. The approach of using epitaxial thin films to isolate crystallographic orientation effects is methodologically sound and transferable to other systems. The lattice parameters measured (5.467 Å for UO2, 3.428 Å for U3O8) match bulk reference values, grounding the claims against independent standards.

major comments (1)
  1. §2 (Results), paragraph on CaF2: The claim that the transformation is 'substrate-independent' rests on strain calculations (1.07% and 7.26% for UO2/U3O8 vs. 7.36% and 13.93% for YSZ/U3O8) and a brief mention of replication on CaF2 (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, no phi-scans, rocking curves, or in-situ transformation data are presented for CaF2 in the main text. The strain argument is suggestive but not conclusive: lower strain at the UO2/U3O8 interface does not strictly preclude substrate-mediated influence on nucleation orientation, particularly during early-stage transformation when the U3O8 layer is thin. The authors should either present the CaF2 data with the same XRD rigor as the YSZ data, or soften the substrate-independence claim to a clearly labeled inference. This is secondary to the primary orientation relationship on YSZ, which is well-established, but the current phrasing(
minor comments (7)
  1. §1 (Introduction), paragraph 3: The phrase 'a wealth of experience and literature on polycrystal [11, 12, 41, 42] and single crystal thin film growth [12, 43-45]' is awkwardly constructed. Consider rephrasing.
  2. §2 (Results), Fig. 1 caption: The caption states 'uranium atoms are shown in blue and oxygen atoms in gray' but the figure panels (A), (B), (C) are not clearly distinguished in the caption text. Consider explicitly labeling which panels correspond to which oxidation state.
  3. §2 (Results), paragraph on strain analysis: The strain values (1.07%, 7.26%, 7.36%, 13.93%) are presented without specifying the direction or the reference lattice parameter used for calculation. Clarify which axes these strains correspond to and how they were computed.
  4. §3 (Discussion), paragraph 2: The oxidation sequence is given as 'UO2 -> UO2+x -> U4O9 -> U3O8' but the in-situ XRD experiment (§2) describes an intermediate step at 150°C producing U3O7, not U4O9. Clarify the relationship between U3O7 and U4O9 in this context, or correct the sequence.
  5. §4.2 (Methods, HT-ESEM): The oxygen pressure is stated as '350 Pa' (3.5 mbar) while the figure caption for Fig. 1 states '3.5 mbar O2 at 500°C.' These are consistent but the text should use consistent units.
  6. Fig. 2B: The time axis is not clearly labeled with units. Clarify whether the x-axis represents hours or days.
  7. §2 (Results), paragraph on rocking curves: The FWHM values are given as 0.072 +/- 0.002 degrees and 1.52 +/- 0.02 degrees for UO2, and 4.91 +/- 0.03 degrees for U3O8. The error analysis methodology (Bayesian inference with MCMC) is mentioned in §4.3 but the specific priors and convergence criteria are not described. Consider adding a brief note on the robustness of these error estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: experimental results grounded in independent XRD/SEM measurements and external bulk reference values

full rationale

The paper's central claim—a reversible topotactic transition from (001) UO2 to (130) U3O8 with a defined epitaxial relationship (Δφ = 45°)—is established through independent experimental measurements: in-situ XRD showing phase coexistence (Fig. 2B), off-specular φ-scans confirming the orientation relationship (Fig. 3A), rocking curves (Fig. 4D), and SEM domain imaging (Fig. 4A–C). Lattice parameters derived from the data (5.467 Å for UO2, 3.428 Å for U3O8) are compared against external bulk reference values from independent literature [70, 72], not against the authors' own prior fitted results. The strain analysis (1.07%/7.26% for UO2/U3O8 vs. 7.36%/13.93% for YSZ/U3O8) uses directly measured lattice spacings, not fitted parameters repackaged as predictions. Self-citations [11, 12, 42] provide methodological context (polyepitaxial growth, thin film fabrication) but do not form a chain where the present result is defined in terms of the authors' prior claims. The substrate-independence argument is supported by a strain comparison and replication on CaF2 (Supplementary Fig. 2); while the CaF2 data is under-presented, this is a question of evidence sufficiency, not circularity. No step in the derivation chain reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities, particles, forces, or postulated constructs are introduced. The paper is purely experimental, relying on established crystallographic structures (UO2 fluorite, U3O8 orthorhombic) and standard characterization techniques. Free parameters are experimental conditions, not fitted model parameters. Axioms are standard domain assumptions from the uranium oxide literature.

free parameters (3)
  • Oxidation temperature (XRD) = 300°C
    Chosen empirically to promote U3O8 phase transition; 150°C was used first for U3O7, then raised. Not a fitted parameter in the mathematical sense but an experimental condition selected by the authors.
  • Oxygen partial pressure (XRD) = 200 mbar
    Selected experimental condition for in-situ oxidation.
  • Film thickness = ~60 nm
    Controlled deposition parameter; chosen to enable thin film study but not fitted to the transformation result.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The oxidation sequence UO2 → UO2+x → U4O9 → U3O8 is well-established.
    Stated in the Discussion section; cited to Desgranges et al. [70]. The paper does not re-derive this sequence but relies on it to interpret the staged oxidation.
  • domain assumption Bulk lattice parameters for UO2 (5.47 Å) and U3O8 (3.429 Å for (130)) are correct reference values.
    Used in the Results section to validate that measured thin film values match bulk. Cited to [70, 72].
  • domain assumption The reduction procedure under hydrogen partial pressure reliably converts U3O8 back to UO2 following established procedures.
    Stated in Results; references Pijolat et al. [71]. The reversibility claim depends on this procedure being valid.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Topotactic Phase Transition in the Uranium Oxide System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QJ2SOTTG

@misc{pith2026260707291,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Topotactic Phase Transition in the Uranium Oxide System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QJ2SOTTG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07291}
}
read the original abstract

A topotactic phase transition involves the transformation of one crystalline solid to another, which may include the loss or gain of material, where the orientation of the parent crystal determines the orientation of the daughter. We set out an experimental approach, based on polyepitaxial thin film deposition, where the precise transformation mechanism in important physico-chemical processes can be revealed in brilliant detail. Here, we find a reversible topotactic transition from (001) cubic UO2 to a (130) orthorhombic U3O8 structure; a >35% expansion/contraction. This remarkable result solves a puzzle that has eluded researchers for decades, and presents a method for determining the mechanism of crystallographic transformation in many other compounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Desiraju, G. R. Crystal engineering: a holistic view.Angewandte Chemie International Edition46, 8342–8356 (2007)

  2. [2]

    Nangia, A. K. & Desiraju, G. R. Crystal engineering: an outlook for the future. Angewandte Chemie International Edition58, 4100–4107 (2019)

  3. [3]

    & Schmid, S.Manufacturing Engineering & Technology(Pearson Education, 2013)

    Kalpakjian, S. & Schmid, S.Manufacturing Engineering & Technology(Pearson Education, 2013)

  4. [4]

    K.Geometry of crystals, polycrystals, and phase transformations (CRC press, 2017)

    Bhadeshia, H. K.Geometry of crystals, polycrystals, and phase transformations (CRC press, 2017)

  5. [5]

    & Rethwisch, D.Callister’s Materials Science and Engineering (Wiley, 2020)

    Callister, W. & Rethwisch, D.Callister’s Materials Science and Engineering (Wiley, 2020). 12

  6. [6]

    Roberge, P.Corrosion Engineering: Principles and Practice(McGraw-Hill, 2008)

  7. [7]

    Birks, N., Meier, G. H. & Pettit, F. S.Introduction to the high temperature oxidation of metals(Cambridge university press, 2006)

  8. [8]

    Fultz, B.Phase Transitions in Materials(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    & Moore, E.Solid State Chemistry: An Introduction, Fourth Edition (CRC Press, 2016)

    Smart, L. & Moore, E.Solid State Chemistry: An Introduction, Fourth Edition (CRC Press, 2016)

  2. [10]

    Meng, Z.et al.Topotactic transition: A promising opportunity for creating new oxides.Advanced Functional Materials33, 2305225 (2023)

  3. [11]

    Wasik, J.et al.Polyepitaxial grain matching to study the oxidation of uranium dioxide.npj Materials Degradation8, 68 (2024)

  4. [12]

    M.Oxidation of Uranium Dioxide

    Wasik, J. M.Oxidation of Uranium Dioxide. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bristol (2021)

  5. [13]

    4 (Naval Reactors, Division of Reactor Development, US Atomic Energy Commission, 1961)

    Belle, J.Uranium dioxide: properties and nuclear applicationsVol. 4 (Naval Reactors, Division of Reactor Development, US Atomic Energy Commission, 1961)

  6. [14]

    McEachern, R. J. & Taylor, P. A review of the oxidation of uranium dioxide at temperatures below 400°C.Journal of Nuclear Materials254, 87–121 (1998)

  7. [15]

    & Willis, B

    Bevan, D., Grey, I. & Willis, B. The crystal structure ofβ-U 4O9-y.Journal of Solid State Chemistry61, 1–7 (1986)

  8. [16]

    Rousseau, G.et al.A detailed study of UO 2 to U 3O8 oxidation phases and the associated rate-limiting steps.Journal of nuclear materials355, 10–20 (2006)

  9. [17]

    Leinders, G.et al.Low-temperature oxidation of fine UO 2 powders: A process of nanosized domain development.Inorganic Chemistry55, 3915–3927 (2016)

  10. [18]

    Li, D.et al.Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate.Nature572, 624–627 (2019)

  11. [19]

    & Cheetham, A

    Tominaka, S., Yoshikawa, H., Matsushita, Y. & Cheetham, A. K. Topotactic reduction of oxide nanomaterials: unique structure and electronic properties of reduced TiO2 nanoparticles.Materials Horizons1, 106–110 (2014)

  12. [20]

    G., Nallagatla, V

    Kim, H. G., Nallagatla, V. R., Kwon, D.-H., Jung, C. U. & Kim, M. In situ observations of topotactic phase transitions in a ferrite memristor.Journal of Applied Physics128(2020)

  13. [21]

    Jeen, H.et al.Topotactic phase transformation of the brownmillerite SrCoO 2.5 to the perovskite SrCoO 3-δ.Advanced Materials25(2013). 13

  14. [22]

    Khare, A.et al.Topotactic metal–insulator transition in epitaxial SrFeO X thin films.Advanced Materials29, 1606566 (2017)

  15. [23]

    Topotactic transformations in iron oxides and oxyhydroxides

    Dasgupta, D. Topotactic transformations in iron oxides and oxyhydroxides. Indian Journal of Physics35, 401–419 (1961)

  16. [24]

    Lee, K.et al.Aspects of the synthesis of thin film superconducting infinite-layer nickelates.APL Materials8, 4 (2020)

  17. [25]

    & Skrabalak, S

    Fu, J. & Skrabalak, S. E. Enhanced photoactivity from single-crystalline SrTaO2N nanoplates synthesized by topotactic nitridation.Angewandte Chemie 129, 14357–14361 (2017)

  18. [26]

    & Perlin, P.Phonons and phase transitions in GaNVol

    Christensen, N. & Perlin, P.Phonons and phase transitions in GaNVol. 50 (Elsevier, 1997)

  19. [27]

    M., Mckay, D., Smith, R

    Hunter, S. M., Mckay, D., Smith, R. I., Hargreaves, J. S. & Gregory, D. H. Topotactic nitrogen transfer: structural transformation in cobalt molybdenum nitrides.Chemistry of Materials22, 2898–2907 (2010)

  20. [28]

    Goto, S.et al.Synthesis and magnetic properties of tetragonally ordered Fe 2Ni2N alloy using topotactic nitriding reaction.Journal of Alloys and Compounds885, 161122 (2021)

  21. [29]

    D., Weidemann, M

    Kloß, S. D., Weidemann, M. L. & Attfield, J. P. Preparation of bulk-phase nitride perovskite LaReN 3 and topotactic reduction to LaNiN 2-type LaReN 2. Angewandte Chemie International Edition60, 22260–22264 (2021)

  22. [30]

    Physical Review B47, 16124 (1993)

    Abbate, M.et al.Electronic structure and spin-state transition of LaCoO 3. Physical Review B47, 16124 (1993)

  23. [31]

    Kawai, M.et al.Reversible changes of epitaxial thin films from perovskite LaNiO 3 to infinite-layer structure LaNiO 2.Applied Physics Letters94(2009)

  24. [32]

    Materials Today Physics29, 100922 (2022)

    Hu, K.et al.Atomic-scale observation of strain-dependent reversible topotactic transition in La 0.7SrO0.3MnOx films under an ultra-high vacuum environment. Materials Today Physics29, 100922 (2022)

  25. [33]

    & Tsuchiya, T

    Nomoto, J., Yamaguchi, I., Nakajima, T. & Tsuchiya, T. Texture and phase con- trol of magnetron-sputtered VO2 thin films with an Al-doped ZnO seed layer using topotactic oxidization.Surface and Coatings Technology394, 125769 (2020)

  26. [34]

    Lee, J.et al.Redox-driven nanoscale topotactic transformations in epitax- ial SrFe 0.8Co0.2O3-x under atmospheric pressure.Physical Review Applied10, 054035 (2018)

  27. [35]

    Vaney, J.-B.et al.Topotactic fluorination of intermetallics as an efficient route towards quantum materials.Nature Communications13, 1462 (2022). 14

  28. [36]

    Takimoto, D.et al.Platinum nanosheets synthesized via topotactic reduc- tion of single-layer platinum oxide nanosheets for electrocatalysis.Nature Communications14, 19 (2023)

  29. [37]

    & Park, C.-M

    Park, J.-W. & Park, C.-M. Electrochemical li topotactic reaction in layered SnP 3 for superior li-ion batteries.Scientific Reports6, 35980 (2016)

  30. [38]

    Yao, L.et al.Electron-beam-induced perovskite–brownmillerite–perovskite struc- tural phase transitions in epitaxial La 2/3Sr1/3MnO3 films.Advanced Materials 26, 2789–2793 (2014)

  31. [39]

    Chen, S.et al.Versatile and highly efficient controls of reversible topotactic metal–insulator transitions through proton intercalation.Advanced Functional Materials29, 1907072 (2019)

  32. [40]

    A.et al.Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate

    Pan, G. A.et al.Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate. Nature materials21, 160–164 (2022)

  33. [41]

    Popel, A.et al.Structural effects in UO 2 thin films irradiated with u ions.Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms386, 8–15 (2016)

  34. [42]

    Springell, R.et al.A review of uranium-based thin films.Advances in Physics 71, 1–79 (2022)

  35. [43]

    Bao, Z.et al.Antiferromagnetism in UO 2 thin epitaxial films.Physical Review B88, 134426 (2013)

  36. [44]

    Elektronenbeugungs-untersuchung an einkristallinen schichten von ura- noxyden im bereich von UO2 bis U4O9.Journal of Nuclear Materials3, 235–236 (1961)

    Steeb, S. Elektronenbeugungs-untersuchung an einkristallinen schichten von ura- noxyden im bereich von UO2 bis U4O9.Journal of Nuclear Materials3, 235–236 (1961)

  37. [45]

    Rennie, S.et al.The role of crystal orientation in the dissolution of UO 2 thin films.Corrosion science145, 162–169 (2018)

  38. [46]

    The reaction between uranium and oxygen.Journal of the American Chemical Society74, 1079–1081 (1952)

    Cubicciotti, D. The reaction between uranium and oxygen.Journal of the American Chemical Society74, 1079–1081 (1952)

  39. [47]

    & Leon, S.Nuclear Power Reactor Designs: From History to Advances(Elsevier Science, 2023)

    Wang, J., Talabi, S. & Leon, S.Nuclear Power Reactor Designs: From History to Advances(Elsevier Science, 2023)

  40. [48]

    E., Shoesmith, D

    Eriksen, T. E., Shoesmith, D. W. & Jonsson, M. Radiation induced dissolution of UO 2 based nuclear fuel–a critical review of predictive modelling approaches. Journal of Nuclear Materials420, 409–423 (2012)

  41. [49]

    Ilton, E. S. & Bagus, P. S. XPS determination of uranium oxidation states. Surface and Interface Analysis43, 1549–1560 (2011). 15

  42. [50]

    R.et al.Nanoscale oxygen defect gradients in UO 2+x surfaces

    Spurgeon, S. R.et al.Nanoscale oxygen defect gradients in UO 2+x surfaces. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences116, 17181–17186 (2019)

  43. [51]

    Nuclear Fuel Cycle(Springer Nature Singapore, 2023)

    Tomar, B.et al. Nuclear Fuel Cycle(Springer Nature Singapore, 2023)

  44. [52]

    IAEA.Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management IAEA Nuclear Energy Series (International Atomic Energy Agency, 2022)

  45. [53]

    J.et al.An atomic-scale understanding of UO 2 surface evolution during anoxic dissolution.ACS applied materials & interfaces12, 39781–39786 (2020)

    Popel, A. J.et al.An atomic-scale understanding of UO 2 surface evolution during anoxic dissolution.ACS applied materials & interfaces12, 39781–39786 (2020)

  46. [54]

    C., Lee, W

    Middleburgh, S. C., Lee, W. E. & Rushton, M. J. Structure and properties of amorphous uranium dioxide.Acta Materialia202, 366–375 (2021)

  47. [55]

    D.et al.Advances in actinide thin films: synthesis, properties, and future directions.Reports on Progress in Physics85, 123101 (2022)

    Vallejo, K. D.et al.Advances in actinide thin films: synthesis, properties, and future directions.Reports on Progress in Physics85, 123101 (2022)

  48. [56]

    Surface reactions of uranium oxide powder, thin films and single crystals.Surface Science Reports65, 67–109 (2010)

    Idriss, H. Surface reactions of uranium oxide powder, thin films and single crystals.Surface Science Reports65, 67–109 (2010)

  49. [57]

    Strehle, M. M.et al.Characterization of single crystal uranium-oxide thin films grown via reactive-gas magnetron sputtering on yttria-stabilized zirconia and sapphire.Thin Solid Films520, 5616–5626 (2012)

  50. [58]

    Physical Review B97, 224303 (2018)

    Rennie, S.et al.Study of phonons in irradiated epitaxial thin films of UO 2. Physical Review B97, 224303 (2018)

  51. [59]

    C., Tempest, P

    Allen, G. C., Tempest, P. A. & Tyler, J. W. Oxidation of crystalline UO 2 stud- ied using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction.Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases83, 925–935 (1987)

  52. [60]

    & Holmes, N

    Allen, G. & Holmes, N. A mechanism for the UO 2 toα-U 3O8 phase transforma- tion.Journal of Nuclear Materials223, 231–237 (1995)

  53. [61]

    & Belle, J

    Aronson, S., Roof Jr, R. & Belle, J. Kinetic study of the oxidation of uranium dioxide.The Journal of Chemical Physics27, 137–144 (1957)

  54. [62]

    & Siegel, S

    Hoekstra, H., Santoro, A. & Siegel, S. The low temperature oxidation of UO 2 and U4O9.Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry18, 166–178 (1961)

  55. [63]

    Westrum Jr, E. F. & Grønvold, F. Triuranium heptaoxides: Heat capacities and thermodynamic properties ofα-andβ-U 3O7 from 5 to 350 K.Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids23, 39–53 (1962)

  56. [64]

    & Fischer, H

    Desgranges, L., Baldinozzi, G., Simeone, D. & Fischer, H. Refinement of theα- U4O9 crystalline structure: New insight into the U 4O9→U 3O8 transformation. Inorganic Chemistry50, 6146–6151 (2011). 16

  57. [65]

    The oxidation of uranium dioxides.Journal of Applied Chemistry15, 128–135 (1965)

    Walker, D. The oxidation of uranium dioxides.Journal of Applied Chemistry15, 128–135 (1965)

  58. [66]

    Taylor, P., Wood, D. D. & Duclos, A. M. The early stages of U 3O8 formation on unirradiated candu UO 2 fuel oxidized in air at 200–300°C.Journal of nuclear materials189, 116–123 (1992)

  59. [67]

    & Park, H

    Bae, K., Kim, B., Lee, Y., Yang, M. & Park, H. Oxidation behavior of unirradiated UO2 pellets.Journal of nuclear materials209, 274–279 (1994)

  60. [68]

    Qu´ emard, L.et al.On the origin of the sigmoid shape in the UO2 oxidation weight gain curves.Journal of the European Ceramic Society29, 2791–2798 (2009)

  61. [69]

    & Tyler, J

    Allen, G., Tempest, P. & Tyler, J. The formation of U 3O8 on crystalline UO 2. Philosophical Magazine B54, L67–L71 (1986)

  62. [70]

    & Calvarin, G

    Desgranges, L., Baldinozzi, G., Rousseau, G., Niepce, J.-C. & Calvarin, G. Neu- tron diffraction study of the in situ oxidation of UO 2.Inorganic chemistry48, 7585–7592 (2009)

  63. [71]

    & Soustelle, M

    Pijolat, M., Brun, C., Valdivieso, F. & Soustelle, M. Reduction of uranium oxide u3o8 to uo2 by hydrogen.Solid State Ionics101, 931–935 (1997)

  64. [72]

    & Sorrell, C

    Ackermann, R., Chang, A. & Sorrell, C. A. Thermal expansion and phase transfor- mations of the U3O8- z phase in air.Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry 39, 75–85 (1977)

  65. [73]

    The defect structure of hyper-stoichiometric uranium dioxide.Foun- dations of Crystallography34, 88–90 (1978)

    Willis, B. The defect structure of hyper-stoichiometric uranium dioxide.Foun- dations of Crystallography34, 88–90 (1978)

  66. [74]

    Desgranges, L.et al.Influence of the U 3O7 domain structure on cracking during the oxidation of UO 2.Journal of Nuclear Materials402, 167–172 (2010)

  67. [75]

    Song, K. W. & Yang, M. S. Formation of columnar U 3O8 grains on the oxidation of UO2 pellets in air at 900°C.Journal of nuclear materials209, 270–273 (1994)

  68. [76]

    A., Rasband, W

    Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. Nih image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis.Nature methods9, 671–675 (2012)

  69. [77]

    Esteves, G., Ramos, K., Fancher, C. M. & Jones, J. L. Lipras: Line- profile analysis software.Preprint at https://www. researchgate. net/publica- tion/316985889 LIPRAS Line-Profile Analysis Software(2017). 17

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.