Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 39 references

Involution-equivariant topological recursion and mirror symmetry for the affine binary dihedral Calabi--Yau threefold

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-09 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mirror symmetry extended beyond toric geometry

desk verdict First all-genus remodeling theorem for a non-toric CY target; sound strategy with one analytically delicate step in the gauge-fixing argument read the letter →

arxiv 2607.07355 v1 pith:O7I2HWLR submitted 2026-07-08 math.AG math-phmath.MP

Bohan Fang , Zhuoming Lan , Jingxiang Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath-phmath.MP
keywords recursioncurvemathcalbinarydihedralequivariantmathbborbifold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a remodeling-type mirror symmetry theorem for the affine Calabi-Yau threefold [C^2/Gamma x C], where Gamma is a binary dihedral subgroup of SU(2). This target is not toric, so the standard toric mirror-curve machinery does not apply. The authors replace the toric mirror curve with the type-D_l logarithmic Toda curve and replace ordinary Chekhov-Eynard-Orantin topological recursion with a Z_2-equivariant version run in the sign sector of the Toda-curve involution, using the Prym kernel as its two-point input. They then show that the output of this recursion equals the Gromov-Witten generating functions of the target, in the stable range, after a parity-twisted leaf substitution. The proof proceeds by identifying the genus-zero Frobenius structures on both sides, comparing the B-model R-matrix (defined by regularized stationary phase) with the A-model Givental-Teleman R-matrix on a smooth oscillatory chamber, and then matching the resulting graph sums term by term.

What carries the argument

Z_2-equivariant topological recursion with Prym kernel

What would settle it

If the parity-even boundary values along the chosen analytic arc at the orbifold point fail to determine all entries of the residual diagonal gauge D, then the R-matrix comparison would leave an undetermined gauge factor and the graph-sum identification would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central object is the involution-equivariant sign-sector topological recursion on the type-D_l logarithmic Toda curve, run with the Prym kernel B^- = B^std - (id x iota)^* B^std as its two-point input. The paper's main discovery is that this recursion, after a parity-twisted leaf substitution, produces exactly the descendant Gromov-Witten generating functions of the binary dihedral Calabi-Yau threefold X = [C^2/Gamma x C] for n > 0 and 2g-2+n > 0, and that the recursion free energies equal the equivariant GW free energies for g >= 2. The key technical mechanism enabling the comparison is the proof that the B-model R-matrix (defined by regularized stationary-phase transforms of secondkind

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the B-model and A-model R-matrices are equal relies on showing they are two normalized canonical solutions of the same Dubrovin equation, leaving a residual diagonal symplectic gauge. This gauge is removed using boundary values along a single analytic arc approaching the orbifold point, specifically the parity-even flat-unit limit at the fixed labels. If the boundary values along this single arc do not fully capture all diagonal gauge entries, the argument that

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Extends the remodeling conjecture beyond the toric Calabi-Yau setting to targets governed by ADE-type and Toda-type integrable structures.
  • The involution-equivariant sign-sector recursion with the Prym kernel provides a concrete template for mirror symmetry on other non-toric targets with discrete symmetries.
  • The semistable degeneration and boundary gauge-fixing technique at the orbifold point may apply to other mirror curves where the naive flat limit is non-reduced.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same sign-sector recursion framework applies to other ADE-type Calabi-Yau threefolds [C^2/Gamma x C] with Gamma of type A or E, one would expect analogous Toda-curve B-models and analogous all-genus remodeling statements.
  • The parity-twisted leaf substitution that cancels the DOSS graph sign could be a general feature of involution-equivariant recursions whenever the A-model half-edge carries R(-z) while the B-model carries R(z).
  • The flat algebra extension across pole-cancellation strata, replacing nilpotent special fibers with stabilizer algebras, may be reusable for other mirror curves where zeros and poles of the superpotential coalesce.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper proves a closed-string remodeling statement for the affine binary dihedral Calabi--Yau orbifold threefold $X = [C^2/Γ × C]$, where $Γ$ is a binary dihedral subgroup of $SU(2)$. This target lies outside the toric setting of the BKMP remodeling conjecture. The authors replace the toric mirror curve by the type-$D_l$ logarithmic Toda curve of Brini--Ma--Strachan, and replace ordinary Chekhov--Eynard--Orantin topological recursion by the $Z_2$-equivariant topological recursion of Giacchetto--Kramer--Lewański, run in the sign sector of the Toda-curve involution with the Prym kernel as its two-point input. The paper identifies the equivariant orbifold quantum cohomology Frobenius manifold of $X$ with the invariant Jacobian Frobenius structure of the Toda curve (Theorem 5.7), proves that the B-model $R$-matrix defined by regularized stationary phase equals the A-side normalized canonical Givental--Teleman $R$-matrix on the smooth oscillatory chamber (Theorem 6.14), and then compares the resulting graph sums to identify the sign-sector recursion with descendant GW generating functions (Theorem 7.10) and the recursion free energies with equivariant GW free energies (Theorem 7.14). The proof follows the graph-comparison strategy of Fang--Liu--Zong, adapted to the non-toric, involution-equivariant setting.

Significance. This is a substantial extension of the remodeling program beyond the toric Calabi--Yau setting. The replacement of the toric mirror curve by a logarithmic Toda curve and the use of involution-equivariant topological recursion with the Prym kernel are novel and well-motivated. The A-model $R$-matrix computation (Section 2) via quantum Riemann--Roch and character theory is clean and verifiable. The semistable degeneration construction (Section 3) and the reduced B-model graph sum (Section 4) are carefully set up. The genus-zero Frobenius isomorphism (Section 5) correctly combines the Brini--Ma--Strachan surface mirror theorem, the Bryan--Gholampour and Hu ADE quantum McKay input, and the third-leg normalization. The paper produces falsifiable predictions (the free-energy and descendant equalities of Theorems 7.10 and 7.14) that could in principle be checked against explicit GW computations for small $l$.

major comments (2)
  1. Lemma 6.8 (coefficientwise parity limit) is the most analytically delicate step in the paper and is load-bearing for the gauge-fixing argument of Proposition 6.13, which in turn is load-bearing for Theorem 6.14. The proof uses a composition of Weierstrass preparation on $F_σ(t,s,a)$, lifting to the logarithmic square-root cover, tracking the Hessian degeneration, and showing coefficientwise convergence of the odd Morse germ. While each individual step is standard and the argument appears correct, the composition is intricate enough that a targeted verification would significantly strengthen confidence. Specifically, for $l=4$ (the smallest case, rank 5), an explicit computation of the first few coefficients $ˇh^{r,±}_k(ε)$ for $k=1,2,3$ and verification that their average converges to $ˇh^{r,main}_k$ would settle the concern. The leading-order check (Hessian ratio $4m^2/m^2$) is already在
  2. §6.4, Proposition 6.13: The removability argument (Lemma 6.12) is used to pass from equality $ˆR_B = ˆR^X_A$ over the localized completed ring $K$ to analytic continuation on $Ω_B$. The argument is algebraically standard, but the paper would benefit from explicitly stating, for at least one concrete coefficient (e.g., the $z^1$ coefficient of a fixed-node entry), how the apparent pole along a pole-cancellation stratum is removed. This would make the bridge between the formal comparison over $K$ and the analytic chamber statement more transparent.
minor comments (7)
  1. §1.8: The disclosure of AI-assisted development is commendable for transparency. However, the statement that 'the mathematics of this paper was generated by a Rethlas-based system' is unusual for a mathematics journal. The authors should clarify the extent to which the proofs were verified by the human authors versus the AI system, and confirm that all mathematical arguments have been checked by the human authors.
  2. §4.2, equation (4.6): The explicit upstairs form of $B^-$ is given, but the factor of 2 relative to the $Z_2$-equivariant bidifferential convention of [GKL25] is only explained in Remark 4.2. A brief parenthetical in equation (4.6) itself would help the reader.
  3. §5.6, Proposition 5.10: This is a long and important proposition. The proof is divided into six steps, but the logical flow between steps could be clearer. In particular, Step 3 (modified Kodaira--Spencer map) and Step 5 (residue pairing) both involve lengthy computations that could benefit from being broken into named sub-lemmas.
  4. §6.3: The notation for the fixed-node labels ($r = ±1$ for the node, $σ = ±$ for the two smooth critical points) is introduced somewhat late. Introducing it at the beginning of §6.3 would improve readability.
  5. §7.3, Lemma 7.8: The parity counting argument is clean, but the sign convention for the dilaton leaf ($(-1)^{k+1}$ with $k ≥ 2$) could be stated more prominently, as it is easy to confuse with the ordinary leaf sign.
  6. The paper would benefit from a summary table of the label dictionary (Definition 6.17) showing the correspondence between ramification labels, irreducible characters, and fixed-node/bubble directions, for a concrete small case such as $l=4$.
  7. Several references are to very recent or forthcoming work ([BMS25], [FLYZ25], [GKL25], [JGJ+26], [LGS+26]). The authors should verify that the cited results are in their final published form and that the references are complete.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for the constructive recommendation. The two major comments both request targeted verification of the most analytically delicate steps in the paper, and we agree that providing explicit checks will strengthen the manuscript. We address them in turn.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Lemma 6.8 (coefficientwise parity limit) is the most analytically delicate step... a targeted verification would significantly strengthen confidence. Specifically, for l=4 (the smallest case, rank 5), an explicit computation of the first few coefficients ˇh^{r,±}_k(ε) for k=1,2,3 and verification that their average converges to ˇh^{r,main}_k would settle the concern.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification for l=4 would significantly strengthen confidence in Lemma 6.8, and we will include it in the revised manuscript. The case l=4 (m=2) is the smallest binary dihedral group of order 8, with rank-5 Frobenius algebra. In this case the main component has equation λ = K(μ² + μ⁻²), the two fixed nodes are at μ = ±1, and the Hessian ratio 4m²/m² = 4 already appears in the leading-order check noted by the referee. We will add an explicit computation of the coefficients ˇh^{r,±}_k(ε) for k = 1, 2, 3 along a specific approach arc γ(ε), verifying that their average converges coefficientwise to ˇh^{r,main}_k. The computation uses the Weierstrass preparation and square-root cover lifting already described in the proof, specialized to the m = 2 cyclotomic factorization, where the relevant functions simplify enough to permit closed-form expressions for the first three Morse coefficients. We expect this to fit within approximately one page of additional text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §6.4, Proposition 6.13: The removability argument (Lemma 6.12) is used to pass from equality ˆR_B = ˆR^X_A over the localized completed ring K to analytic continuation on Ω_B... the paper would benefit from explicitly stating, for at least one concrete coefficient (e.g., the z^1 coefficient of a fixed-node entry), how the apparent pole along a pole-cancellation stratum is removed.

    Authors: We agree that illustrating the removability mechanism with a concrete coefficient would make the bridge between the formal comparison over K and the analytic chamber statement more transparent. We will add a worked example for the z¹ coefficient of a fixed-node entry of ˆR_B. Concretely, the z¹ coefficient of the regularized stationary-phase expansion is a universal polynomial in the inverse Hessian and the first Morse jet of the Prym kernel evaluation. Near a pole-cancellation stratum, the Hessian of ˆx at the smooth fixed-node critical point degenerates, producing an apparent pole. However, the same degeneration causes the first Morse jet of the evaluated Prym kernel B_β to vanish at a compensating rate, because B⁻ = B^std − (id×ι)_*B^std and the two standard kernel evaluations cancel to leading order at the coalescing ι-fixed point. The product of the inverse Hessian and the Morse jet is therefore holomorphic across the stratum. We will write out this cancellation explicitly for the z¹ coefficient at the fixed node r = +1, showing how the apparent ε⁻¹ pole is removed. This should take roughly half a page. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; one minor self-citation that is not load-bearing for the central comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the equality of the B-model R-matrix R̂_B with the A-side R-matrix R̂^X_can (Theorem 6.14) and the resulting descendant remodeling (Theorem 7.10)—is not circular. The A-side R-matrix is computed independently from quantum Riemann-Roch and character theory (Proposition 2.3), while the B-side R-matrix is defined by regularized stationary-phase integrals of Prym kernel forms (Definition 4.5). The proof that both solve the same Dubrovin equation (Proposition 6.1) uses the Rauch variational formula and explicit Beta-integral computations. The residual diagonal gauge D is removed by the parity-even flat-unit boundary limit (Proposition 6.13), whose key inputs—Lemma 6.7 (main thimble unit series via Euler Beta integrals) and Lemma 6.8 (coefficientwise parity limit via Weierstrass preparation)—are independent analytic computations, not restatements of the conclusion. The genus-zero Frobenius isomorphism (Theorem 5.7) combines the Brini-Ma-Strachan surface mirror theorem [BMS25], Bryan-Gholampour ADE results [BG08], and Hu's quantum McKay theorem [Hu13]. The citation [BMS25] shares author Ma with the present paper, but it provides the genus-zero B-model Frobenius structure as external input; the present paper's contribution is the higher-genus R-matrix comparison and the CY third-leg normalization, which are derived independently. The DOSS graph sum theorem [DBOSS14] is an external result applied to the reduced curve. No step reduces to its inputs by construction. The minor self-citation [BMS25] supplies genus-zero input data but does not make the higher-genus derivation circular. Score 2 reflects this minor self-citation without independent verification of [BMS25], which is not load-bearing for the central R-matrix comparison or the graph-sum identification.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, particles, forces, or postulated objects. The mathematical objects (Toda curve, Prym kernel, reduced local curve, semistable degeneration) are all constructed from standard algebraic-geometric and representation-theoretic data. The binary dihedral group Gamma is a standard finite subgroup of SU(2). No free parameters are fitted to data; the theory is parameter-free once the group Gamma and torus weight nu are fixed.

assumptions (7)
  • standard math The T-equivariant orbifold GW theory of X=[C^2/Gamma x C] reduces to the inverse-Euler-twisted theory of B_Gamma (Definition 2.1, equation 2.1).
    This is the standard equivariant localization reduction for torus actions on affine targets, using Graber-Pandharipande localization [GP99] and orbifold quantum Riemann-Roch [Tse10, LZ23].
  • standard math The Givental-Teleman classification of semisimple CohFTs provides a unique normalized canonical R-matrix for the twisted B_Gamma theory (Section 2.3, citing [Giv01, Tel12]).
    Teleman's classification theorem is a standard result in the field.
  • domain assumption The type-D logarithmic Toda curve of Brini-Ma-Strachan [BMS25] provides the correct genus-zero B-model Frobenius structure for the D_l ADE mirror (Theorem 5.7, citing [BMS25, BG08, Hu13]).
    This is a cited external result. The genus-zero mirror theorem of Brini-Ma-Strachan is used as a black-box input. While Ma is a co-author of both this paper and [BMS25], the result is a parameter-free identification, not a fitted constant.
  • standard math The Z2-equivariant topological recursion of Giacchetto-Kramer-Lewanski [GKL25] applies to the involution iota on the Toda curve with the sign character realized by the Prym kernel B^- (Section 4.3, citing [GKL25]).
    This is a cited external theorem applied to the specific involution. The DOSS graph-sum theorem [DBOSS14] is then applied in the sign-reduced setting.
  • domain assumption The regularized stationary-phase expansion (Definition 4.5, equation 4.16-4.17) defines a well-defined formal R-matrix R_hat_B satisfying the Dubrovin equation and symplectic unitarity.
    The regularization involves dividing by d_x-hat and integrating by parts on relative thimbles. The formal expansion is standard in stationary-phase analysis, but the regularization on the logarithmic curve with the Prym kernel requires the Rauch variational formula (Proposition 6.1) to be valid, which is proved in the paper.
  • domain assumption The semistable degeneration of the Toda curve at the orbifold point (Proposition 3.4) produces a reduced nodal curve whose componentwise kernel is the unique admissible bidifferential (Lemma 3.6).
    This is proved in the paper using blow-up and Weierstrass preparation arguments. The rationality of the smooth fibers and normalized components makes the componentwise assembly canonical (Remark 3.9).
  • standard math The shifted-CohFT dilaton equation (equation 7.18) holds for the analytically continued shifted free energies with no correction from shift insertions, for g>=2.
    Cited to [BDGR18, Eq. (6.16)]. This is the standard dilaton equation for CohFTs with flat unit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Involution-equivariant topological recursion and mirror symmetry for the affine binary dihedral Calabi--Yau threefold." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O7I2HWLR

@misc{pith2026260707355,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Involution-equivariant topological recursion and mirror symmetry for the affine binary dihedral Calabi--Yau threefold},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O7I2HWLR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.07355}
}
abstract

We prove a closed-string remodeling statement for the affine binary dihedral Calabi--Yau orbifold threefold $\mathcal X=[\mathbb C^2/\Gamma\times\mathbb C]$, where $\Gamma$ is a binary dihedral subgroup of $SU(2)$. This target lies outside the toric setting of the Bouchard--Klemm--Mari\~{n}o--Pasquetti remodeling conjecture: the toric mirror curve is replaced by the type-$D_l$ logarithmic Toda curve of Brini--Ma--Strachan, and the Chekhov--Eynard--Orantin topological recursion is replaced by the $\mathbb Z_2$-equivariant topological recursion of Giacchetto--Kramer--Lewa\'nski, run in the sign sector of the Toda-curve involution with the Prym kernel as its two-point input. We identify the equivariant orbifold quantum cohomology Frobenius manifold of $\mathcal X$ with the invariant Jacobian Frobenius structure of the Toda curve, and we prove that the B-model $R$-matrix, defined by regularized stationary phase, equals the A-side normalized canonical Givental--Teleman $R$-matrix on the smooth oscillatory chamber; this equality is anchored at the orbifold point through a semistable degeneration of the Toda curve. Comparing the resulting Givental--Teleman and Dunin-Barkowski--Orantin--Shadrin--Spitz graph sums then identifies, after a parity-twisted leaf substitution, the sign-sector recursion with the descendant Gromov--Witten generating functions of $\mathcal X$ in the stable range ($2g-2+n>0$ with $n>0$), and identifies the recursion free energies with the equivariant Gromov--Witten free energies of $\mathcal X$ for $g\geq2$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    A New Cohomology Theory of Orbifold , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2004 , doi=

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics , series=

    Orbifold Gromov--Witten theory , author=. Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics , series=. 2002 , doi=

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    American Journal of Mathematics , volume=

    Gromov--Witten theory of Deligne--Mumford stacks , author=. American Journal of Mathematics , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Inventiones mathematicae , volume=

    Localization of virtual classes , author=. Inventiones mathematicae , volume=. 1999 , doi=

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Annals of Mathematics , volume=

    Quantum Riemann--Roch, Lefschetz and Serre , author=. Annals of Mathematics , volume=. 2007 , doi=

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Relations between the correlators of the topological sigma-model coupled to gravity , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 1998 , doi=

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    International Mathematics Research Notices , volume=

    Semisimple Frobenius structures at higher genus , author=. International Mathematics Research Notices , volume=. 2001 , doi=

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics , series=

    Orbifold quantum cohomology of the classifying space of a finite group , author=. Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics , series=. 2002 , doi=

    work page 2002

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Geometry & Topology , volume=

    Orbifold Quantum Riemann--Roch, Lefschetz and Serre , author=. Geometry & Topology , volume=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  2. [10]

    Algebra & Number Theory , volume=

    Root systems and the quantum cohomology of ADE resolutions , author=. Algebra & Number Theory , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    2008

  3. [11]

    Inventiones mathematicae , volume=

    The quantum McKay correspondence for polyhedral singularities , author=. Inventiones mathematicae , volume=. 2009 , doi=

    2009

  4. [12]

    Communications in Number Theory and Physics , volume=

    Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion , author=. Communications in Number Theory and Physics , volume=. 2007 , doi=

    2007

  5. [13]

    Inventiones mathematicae , volume=

    The structure of 2D semi-simple field theories , author=. Inventiones mathematicae , volume=. 2012 , doi=

    2012

  6. [14]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Identification of the Givental Formula with the Spectral Curve Topological Recursion Procedure , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2014 , doi=

    2014

  7. [15]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume=

    The quantum McKay correspondence for singularities of type D , author=. Advances in Mathematics , volume=. 2013 , doi=

    2013

  8. [16]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Computation of Open Gromov--Witten Invariants for Toric Calabi--Yau 3-Folds by Topological Recursion, a Proof of the BKMP Conjecture , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2015 , doi=

    2015

  9. [17]

    Algebraic Geometry , volume=

    All-genus open-closed mirror symmetry for affine toric Calabi--Yau 3-orbifolds , author=. Algebraic Geometry , volume=. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  10. [18]

    Geometry & Topology , volume=

    The Eynard--Orantin recursion and equivariant mirror symmetry for the projective line , author=. Geometry & Topology , volume=. 2017 , doi=

    2017

  11. [19]

    Journal of the American Mathematical Society , volume=

    On the remodeling conjecture for toric Calabi--Yau 3-orbifolds , author=. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , volume=. 2020 , doi=

    2020

  12. [20]

    2023 , eprint=

    Twisted Equivariant Gromov-Witten Theory of the Classifying Space of a Finite Group , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    2023

  13. [21]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Dubrovin duality and mirror symmetry for ADE resolutions , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  14. [22]

    2017 , eprint=

    Primitive forms and Frobenius structures on the Hurwitz spaces , author=. 2017 , eprint=

    2017

  15. [23]

    Journal of Differential Geometry , volume=

    Stable morphisms to singular schemes and relative stable morphisms , author=. Journal of Differential Geometry , volume=. 2001 , doi=

    2001

  16. [24]

    2009 , eprint=

    Geometrical interpretation of the topological recursion, and integrable string theories , author=. 2009 , eprint=

    2009

  17. [25]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Tau-structure for the Double Ramification Hierarchies , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2018 , doi=

    2018

  18. [26]

    Topological recursion and its influence in analysis, geometry, and topology , series=

    Primary invariants of Hurwitz Frobenius manifolds , author=. Topological recursion and its influence in analysis, geometry, and topology , series=. 2018 , doi=

    2018

  19. [27]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , volume=

    Open string amplitudes and large order behavior in topological string theory , author=. Journal of High Energy Physics , volume=. 2008 , doi=

    2008

  20. [28]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Remodeling the B-Model , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2009 , doi=

    2009

  21. [29]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Topological Open Strings on Orbifolds , author=. Communications in Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2010 , doi=

    2010

  22. [30]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , volume=

    Free energy topological expansion for the 2-matrix model , author=. Journal of High Energy Physics , volume=. 2006 , doi=

    2006

  23. [31]

    2025 , eprint=

    Remodeling Conjecture with Descendants , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  24. [32]

    Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , volume=

    Chern-Simons theory on spherical Seifert manifolds, topological strings and integrable systems , author=. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , volume=. 2018 , doi=

    2018

  25. [33]

    Selecta Mathematica , volume=

    A new spin on Hurwitz theory and ELSV via theta characteristics , author=. Selecta Mathematica , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  26. [34]

    Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups , series=

    Geometry of 2D topological field theories , author=. Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups , series=. 1996 , doi=

    1996

  27. [35]

    Compositio Mathematica , volume=

    Extended affine Weyl groups and Frobenius manifolds , author=. Compositio Mathematica , volume=. 1998 , doi=

    1998

  28. [36]

    Advances in Mathematics , volume=

    Extended affine Weyl groups of BCD-type: their Frobenius manifolds and Landau--Ginzburg superpotentials , author=. Advances in Mathematics , volume=. 2019 , doi=

    2019

  29. [37]

    Journal de l'

    Mirror symmetry for extended affine Weyl groups , author=. Journal de l'. 2022 , doi=

    2022

  30. [38]

    2026 , eprint=

    Automated Conjecture Resolution with Formal Verification , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

  31. [39]

    2026 , eprint=

    Danus: Orchestrating Mathematical Reasoning Agents with Fact-Graph Memory , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.