Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

The Periodic Table and the Group SO(4,4): II. Double SO(4,2)-tower

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-10 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The full period structure of the chemical elements, including spin doubling and antimatter, is the weight diagram of so(4,4) after its spin Cartan generator splits the system into a double SO(4,2) tower.

desk verdict Clean so(4,4) geometry that kills the fifth quantum number and houses antimatter, but period doubling is still fitted rather than derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08105 v1 pith:XVGDC7MP submitted 2026-07-09 math-ph math.MP

V.V. Varlamov This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 17B1081R0522E70
keywords periodictablespinfourthdegreeoffreedomLiealgebraso(44)24-cellweightdiagramperioddoublingantimatter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the periodic table is not a sequence of independent shells but a single quantum system whose states sit at the nodes of the weight diagram of the rank-four Lie algebra so(4,4). The four quantum numbers n, l, m, s are identified with the eigenvalues of the four Cartan generators of that algebra. The fourth generator, associated with spin, splits the four-dimensional root system (a 24-cell) into two identical three-dimensional cuboctahedra, each the root system of an so(4,2) subalgebra; the corresponding weight diagrams appear as a double SO(4,2) tower. That splitting produces both the familiar spin doubling of orbital capacities and the vertical period-length sequence 2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32, …. The same geometric object continues upward into the Seaborg and ten-period extensions and downward into a mirror antimatter pyramid of antielements. A sympathetic reader cares because the construction supplies a single group-theoretic reason for every observed period length, for the Madelung ordering, and for the natural inclusion of antimatter without extra quantum numbers.

What carries the argument

The double SO(4,2)-tower: the three-dimensional weight diagram obtained when the spin generator L78 splits so(4,4) into two copies of so(4,2). Each floor realises a Fock (j,j) representation of SO(4); the radial generator L56 supplies the principal quantum number that stacks the floors.

What would settle it

A chemical element whose spectroscopic quantum numbers cannot be placed on any node of the double SO(4,2) weight lattice, or an observed period length that falls outside the sequence generated by successive floors of that lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The action of the fourth Cartan generator L78 of so(4,4) splits the Cartan–Weyl basis into two isomorphic Yao bases of so(4,2). The four-dimensional 24-cell root system thereby projects onto two cuboctahedra, and the weight diagram becomes a double SO(4,2) tower whose floors are (j,j) diagrams of SO(4). Chemical elements occupy the nodes of that tower according to the Madelung rule; the same generator produces both horizontal spin doubling and the vertical period sequence 2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32, …. Antimatter appears automatically as the tower reflected through the equatorial plane of negative principal quantum number.

Load-bearing premise

The four quantum numbers of every chemical element are exactly the eigenvalues of the four Cartan generators of so(4,4), so that the group itself is the dynamical symmetry of the entire periodic system.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a group-theoretic model of the periodic table in which the four quantum numbers n, l, m, s of each chemical element are identified with the eigenvalues of the four Cartan generators of the rank-4 Lie algebra so(4,4). The root system is the 24-cell; the spin generator L78 commutes with the so(4,2) subalgebra and splits the Cartan–Weyl basis into two isomorphic Yao bases whose three-dimensional projections are cuboctahedra. The resulting double SO(4,2)-tower (with floors labelled by the radial generator L56) is used to accommodate the Madelung-ordered elements of the ordinary Mendeleev table, the Seaborg 8-period extension, a 10-period extension, and a reflected antimatter pyramid with negative n. Period doubling (2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32, …) is attributed to the action of L78, which simultaneously produces the horizontal spin doubling and the vertical period doubling without an extra fifth quantum number.

Significance. If the identification of Cartan eigenvalues with (n, l, m, s) and the dynamical role of SO(4,4) can be independently justified, the construction would supply a single rank-4 algebraic framework that unifies the ordinary table, its known extensions, spin doubling, and antimatter, while eliminating the artificial fifth quantum number of the Fet–Ostrovsky schemes. The Lie-algebraic facts themselves (rank, Cartan subalgebra, 24-cell, commutation of L78, projection to two cuboctahedra, Yao bases) are standard and correctly stated; the geometric visualisation of the double tower and the explicit inclusion of negative-n antimatter are clear presentational advances over earlier conformal-group models. The work therefore has value as a systematic classification scheme even if it remains an interpretation rather than a derivation from a Hamiltonian.

major comments (3)
  1. The load-bearing physical identification—that every chemical element is a weight vector |n,l,m,s⟩ whose labels are precisely the eigenvalues of {L56, L12, L34, L78}—is asserted rather than derived (§3 after (6), definition of the Madelung ket, and the placement rule used for all subsequent diagrams). No dynamical Hamiltonian, selection rule, or embedding into a larger physical group is given that would force this identification over other rank-4 algebras or tensor-product constructions. Without such a derivation the claim that so(4,4) is the dynamical symmetry remains an axiom of the model.
  2. Once the nodes are labelled by the empirical Madelung sequence (Table 1 and the hand-placement described in §§3–6), the Rydberg dimensions 2n^{2} on each floor and the vertical period-doubling pattern follow automatically from the representation theory of the SO(4) subgroups. Consequently the statement that “the fourth Cartan generator explains period doubling” (Abstract, §7) is true by construction rather than by an independent prediction; the circularity already noted for the Fet–Ostrovsky schemes is not fully removed.
  3. The Seaborg and 10-periodic towers (§§5–6) are obtained simply by continuing the same Madelung filling pattern to higher floors and outer rings. No uniqueness or stability argument is supplied that would select these particular extensions over other possible continuations of the weight lattice; they therefore function as consistent illustrations rather than as falsifiable predictions of the algebra.
minor comments (4)
  1. Table 1 contains several typographical inconsistencies (duplicate Pd entries, incorrect m or s labels for Cl and a few later elements, occasional mismatches with standard configurations). These should be corrected against a standard Madelung listing.
  2. Figures 5, 6, 14 and 16 are described in detail but are not rendered in the manuscript text supplied; their absence makes the geometric claims harder to verify. High-resolution versions with explicit coordinate axes for the Cartan generators would help.
  3. Notation for the split bases (8)–(9) and the two root systems (10)–(11) is clear, yet the subsequent identification of the Yao generators with the usual conformal generators of so(4,2) could be stated more explicitly for readers unfamiliar with Yao’s work.
  4. A short comparison paragraph with the Novaro–Berrondo and Barut SO(3,2) approaches would clarify the precise advantage claimed for so(4,4).

Circularity Check

4 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

Period lengths and doubling are taken from the known Madelung sequence and assigned to floors/rings of the double tower; once nodes are labelled that way, the claim that L78 'explains' doubling follows by construction.

  1. self definitional [Abstract; §3 after (6)–(9); §4 eqs. (12)–(13); §7]
    "The period doubling associated with the sequence of period lengths 2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32, … of the periodic system of elements is explained by the action of the fourth Cartan generator. … the number of states (elements) on each floor of a combined SO(4,2)-tower is determined by the Rydberg sequence 2n^{2}: 2=2·1^{2},8=2·2^{2},18=2·3^{2},32=2·4^{2},… Then there is period doubling … 2,8,8,18,18,32,32,…. … the actual period doubling (13) is the result of the action of the fourth generator L78 (spin generator)"

    The sequence (13) is first taken from the empirical Madelung rule (Table 1 and §2). Nodes are then placed on the weight lattice by that same rule. The statement that L78 ‘explains’ the sequence is therefore true only by the prior assignment of labels; no independent dynamical calculation produces the lengths.

  2. renaming known result [§2 Table 1; §3 Fig. 5; §4–§6 (Mendeleev/Seaborg/10-periodic towers)]
    "In Table 1, the ket-vectors (3) are arranged in ascending order of atomic number Z according to the Madelung numbering. … each node of which (the finite-dimensional representation of the group SO(4,2)) is associated with the corresponding element of the periodic table according to the Madelung numbering. … The rings included in the superstructure are colored red/green."

    The entire tower structure is obtained by taking the known Madelung (n+l,n) ordering, writing the states as |n,l,m,s angle, and drawing them on successive floors of the so(4,4) weight diagram. The resulting pictures are a geometric re-presentation of an already-known empirical pattern, not a derivation of that pattern from the Lie algebra.

2 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [§1; §3; references [8–11]]
    "This article is a continuation of the work [8, 9, 10, 11], which solves the problem of constructing a periodic system of chemical elements within the framework of the weight diagram of the Lie algebra of the fourth rank … It is shown in [10, 11] that such an algebra is so(4,4) … the four quantum numbers n,l,m,s correspond to the eigenvalues (weights) of the Cartan generators"

    The central premise that the four quantum numbers are exactly the Cartan eigenvalues of so(4,4) (rather than of any other rank-4 algebra or a tensor product) is justified solely by citation to the author’s own preceding papers. Those papers supply the same identification; no external uniqueness theorem or independent derivation is given.

  2. self definitional [§3 (identification after (6)); §8 (antimatter)]
    "the four quantum numbers n, l, m, s included in the ket-vector (3) define four degrees of freedom. … the first three quantum numbers n,l, and m correspond to the eigenvalues u,\lambda, and u of the generators L56, L12 and L34 … An adequate description of spin … requires a transition to a fourth-rank Lie algebra. Such an algebra is so(4,4) … The eigenvalue u of the generator L78 corresponds to the fourth quantum number s."

    The map (n,l,m,s) o eigenvalues of {L56,L12,L34,L78} is stipulated by definition. Once stipulated, every subsequent statement that the weight diagram ‘contains’ the periodic table (including antimatter via negative n) is true by that definition, not by an independent calculation.

full rationale

The Lie-algebra facts (rank-4 Cartan {L12,L34,L56,L78}, 24-cell roots, L78 commuting with so(4,2) and splitting the Cartan–Weyl basis into two Yao so(4,2) bases whose projections are cuboctahedra) are mathematically correct and independent. The load-bearing physical claim, however, is the identification of every chemical element with a weight vector |n,l,m,s angle whose labels are precisely the eigenvalues of those four generators, followed by hand-placement of the nodes according to the empirical Madelung rule (Table 1). That placement is asserted, not derived from a dynamical Hamiltonian or from representation theory of a larger physical group. Once the nodes sit on the lattice, the Rydberg dimensions 2n^{2} per floor and the vertical period-doubling sequence 2,8,8,18,18,32,32, au… are automatic. The same circularity appears when the Seaborg and 10-periodic towers are built by simply colouring additional rings and continuing the Madelung numbering. Self-citations to the author’s prior papers supply the identification but do not independently verify it. The result is therefore a group-theoretic re-labelling of a known empirical pattern rather than a first-principles derivation of that pattern.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper rests on standard Lie theory plus one central domain identification (quantum numbers = Cartan weights of so(4,4)) and the empirical Madelung ordering. No numerical free parameters are fitted in this installment; the mass formulae of earlier papers are not used. The double tower and the antimatter pyramid are invented geometric objects whose only evidence is the successful re-labelling of the known table.

assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The four quantum numbers n,l,m,s of every chemical element are the eigenvalues of the four Cartan generators L56, L12, L34, L78 of so(4,4).
    Stated after eq. (6) and used throughout §3–§8; no independent dynamical derivation is given.
  • domain assumption The Madelung (n+l,n) filling order correctly enumerates the ground-state configurations of neutral atoms.
    Taken as empirical input in §2 and Table 1; all subsequent node assignments follow it.
  • standard math Standard structure theory of the real form so(4,4): rank 4, 28 generators, root system the 24-cell, maximal torus generated by the four listed Cartan elements.
    Used without proof in §3; textbook material for D4.
  • domain assumption Chemical elements are states of a single quantum system whose dynamical symmetry is (a covering of) SO(4,4).
    Inherited from the Rumer–Fet–Barut programme and restated in the Introduction and §3.
invented entities (2)
  • Double SO(4,2)-tower (Mendeleev / Seaborg / 10-periodic towers)
    purpose: Geometric realisation of the weight diagram that simultaneously encodes spin doubling, period lengths and homologous series.
    Constructed in §3–§6 by projecting the four-dimensional weight lattice; no independent experimental signature beyond the re-arrangement of known elements.
  • Mendeleev anti-table (antimatter pyramid with negative n)
    purpose: To include antihydrogen, antihelium, … as the reflection of the ordinary tower across the L3–A3 plane.
    Introduced in §8 by allowing negative eigenvalues of L56; no new spectroscopic prediction is derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Periodic Table and the Group SO(4,4): II. Double SO(4,2)-tower." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XVGDC7MP

@misc{pith2026260708105,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Periodic Table and the Group SO(4,4): II. Double SO(4,2)-tower},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XVGDC7MP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08105}
}
abstract

A group-theoretic interpretation of the periodic system of elements is given within the framework of the weight diagram of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(4,4)$ of the fourth rank, where the four quantum numbers $n$, $l$, $m$, $s$ correspond to the eigenvalues (weights) of the Cartan generators of the maximal Abelian subalgebra (the maximal torus of the group SO(4,4)). It is shown that the root system of the algebra $\mathfrak{so}(4,4)$ forms a regular four-dimensional self-dual polyhedron (24-cell). The action of the fourth Cartan generator associated with spin leads to a splitting of the Cartan-Weyl basis of the algebra $\mathfrak{so}(4,4)$ into two structurally identical bases, each of which is isomorphic to the Yao basis of the subalgebra $\mathfrak{so}(4,2)$ (the Lie algebra of the conformal group). At this point, a four-dimensional 24-cell is projected onto two three-dimensional cuboctahedra, each of which defines the root system of the subalgebra $\mathfrak{so}(4,2)$. This splitting physically corresponds to spin doubling (two-valuedness). The structure of the energy levels of a periodic system is studied, the states of which (chemical elements) are represented as nodes of the weight diagram of the group algebra $\mathfrak{so}(4,4)$. The structure of the double SO(4,2)-towers of Mendeleev, Seaborg, and 10-periodic extension is examined in detail. The period doubling associated with the sequence of period lengths 2, 8, 8, 18, 18, 32, 32, $\ldots$ of the periodic system of elements is explained by the action of the fourth Cartan generator. It is shown that antimatter (Mendeleev anti-table consisting of antihydrogen, antihelium, antilitium, $\ldots$) is naturally included in the general group-theoretic scheme of description of the periodic table.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08105 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Janet left-step table of chemical elements (1929). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The periodic table in the Janet-like form of the basic representation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Root diagram of the Lie algebra so(4, 4). Weyl generators form the vertices of a 24-cell in four-dimensional space. The figure shows an orthogonal projection of an octaplex onto a two￾dimensional plane. The fourth generator L78, understood as a spin generator8 , commutes with all 15 generators of the subalgebra so(4, 2). As a consequence, the Cartan-Weyl basis (7) for the algebra so(4, 4) splits into two structurall… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Root diagrams (cuboctahedra) of split bases (8) and (9) of the Lie algebra so(4, 4). The above reduction of the root diagram of the algebra so(4, 4) leads to a similar reduction for the weight diagram [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The periodic system of chemical elements in the split basis of the Lie algebra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Periodic system of chemical elements in the form of a combined weight diagram of split [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The level n = 2 of the weight diagram of the algebra so(4, 4) contains the (1, 1)-diagram of the subalgebra so(4), which completely includes the second period. The seventh period completes the filling of the periodic system. The floor n = 8 contains a double singlet of…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The level n = 3: the (2, 2)-diagram of the subalgebra so(4) contains the entire 3rd period and transition metals of the 4th period Sc, . . ., Mn, Fe, . . ., Zn. numbers ν = 5 and λ = 4 of the symmetry group SO(2, 4)⊗SU(2)⊗SU(2)′ (see also [18]) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figure…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The level n = 4: the (3, 3)-diagram of the subalgebra so(4) contains the completion of the 4th period, transition metals of the 5th period Y, . . ., Tc, Ru, . . ., Cd, as well as the lanthanide family La, Ce, . . ., Yb. → Ubu to the outer ring (n = 5, l = 4) of the fif…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The level n = 5: the (3, 3)-diagram of the subalgebra so(4) contains the completion of the 5th period, the transition metals of the 6th period Lu, . . ., Re, Os, . . ., Hg, as well as the actinoid family Ac, Th, . . ., No. the elements of the superactinoid family of t…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The level n = 6: the (2, 2)-diagram of the subalgebra so(4) contains the completion of the 6th period and the transition metals of the 7th period Lr, . . ., Bh, Hs, . . ., Cn. the ninth period ends. The total number of elements included in the ninth period is 50. Thus…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The level n = 7: the (1, 1)-diagram of the subalgebra so(4) completes the periodic table by filling the 7th period to an inert gas Og (oganesson). of the group G by the subgroup G1 leads to the decomposition of P into an orthogonal sum of irreducible representations P…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Seaborg Tower (8-periodic extension) in the form of a combined weight diagram of the algebra so(4, 4). This double SO(4, 2)-tower is a superstructure above the Mendeleev Tower shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: 10-periodic Tower in the form of a combined weight diagram of the algebra so(4, 4). This double SO(4, 2)-tower is a superstructure above the Seaborg Tower shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The Janet table in a pyramidal form with quantum numbers of the Fet group (the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The elements (n = 1, 2, . . .) and antielements (n = −1, −2, . . .) of the periodic table in the representation of the doubled three-dimensional projection of the weight diagram of the Lie algebra so(4, 4). 33 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Der Bau der Atome und die physikalischen und chemischen Eigenschaften der Ele- mente // Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik

    Bohr N. Der Bau der Atome und die physikalischen und chemischen Eigenschaften der Ele- mente // Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik. 1922. V. 9. P. 1–67

    work page 1922

  2. [2]

    Across the Frontiers

    Heisenberg, W. Across the Frontiers. Harper & Row: New York (1974)

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    // Nature

    Zuo J.M., Kim M., O’Keeffe M., Spence J.C.H. // Nature. 1999. V. 401. P. 49–52

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Scerri E.R. // J. Chem. Educ. 2000. V. 77. P. 1492

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Spence J.C.H., O’Keeffe M., Zuo J.M. // J. Chem. Educ. 2001. V. 78. P. 877

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Spin(4) group and the Mendeleev system

    Rumer Yu.B., Fet A.I. Spin(4) group and the Mendeleev system. // Teor. Mat. Fiz. 1971. V. 9. P. 203–209

    work page 1971

  7. [7]

    Group Structure of the Periodic System / The Structure of Matter: Rutherford Centennial Symposium

    Barut A.O. Group Structure of the Periodic System / The Structure of Matter: Rutherford Centennial Symposium. Ed. by B.G. Wybourne. Christchurch, New Zeland: University of Canterbury Press, 1972. P. 126–136

    work page 1972

  8. [8]

    Group theoretical description of the periodic system of elements: IV

    Varlamov V.V. Group theoretical description of the periodic system of elements: IV. Group algebra // Mathematical structures and modeling. 2024. V. 1(69). P. 18–31

    work page 2024

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Group theoretical description of the periodic system of elements: V

    Varlamov V.V. Group theoretical description of the periodic system of elements: V. Weight diagram // Mathematical structures and modeling. 2024. V. 3(71). P. 4–18

    2024

  2. [10]

    Group theoretical description of the periodic system of elements: VI

    Varlamov V.V. Group theoretical description of the periodic system of elements: VI. An Eight-dimensional generalization // Mathematical structures and modeling. 2025. V. 2(74). P. 18–32

    2025

  3. [11]

    The Periodic Table and the Group SO(4,4) // arXiv:2501.18272 [math-ph] (2025)

    Varlamov V.V. The Periodic Table and the Group SO(4,4) // arXiv:2501.18272 [math-ph] (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    The Periodic System of Chemical Elements

    van Spronsen J.W. The Periodic System of Chemical Elements. Amsterdam/New York: El- sevier, 1969

    1969

  5. [13]

    Graphic Representations of the Periodic System During One Hundred Years

    Mazurs E.G. Graphic Representations of the Periodic System During One Hundred Years. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1974. 35

    1974

  6. [14]

    Periodic Table: its story and its significance

    Scerri E. Periodic Table: its story and its significance. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Die Polygonfl¨ ache und das Periodische System der Elemente // Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik

    Haenzel G. Die Polygonfl¨ ache und das Periodische System der Elemente // Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik. 1943. V. 120. P. 283–300

    1943

  8. [16]

    Bemerkungen zu G

    Finke W. Bemerkungen zu G. Haenzel ,,Die Polygonfl¨ ache und das Periodische System der Elemente.” // Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik. 1943. V. 121. P. 586–587

    1943

  9. [17]

    Symmetry group of chemical elements

    Fet A.I. Symmetry group of chemical elements. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2010

    2010

  10. [18]

    Group theoretical description of periodic system of elements // Mathematical structures and modeling

    Varlamov V.V. Group theoretical description of periodic system of elements // Mathematical structures and modeling. 2018. V. 2(46). P. 5–23

    2018

  11. [19]

    Group theoretical description of periodic system of elements: II

    Varlamov V.V. Group theoretical description of periodic system of elements: II. Seaborg table // Mathematical structures and modeling. 2019. V. 1(49). P. 5–21

    2019

  12. [20]

    Group theoretical description of periodic system of elements: III

    Varlamov V.V. Group theoretical description of periodic system of elements: III. 10-periodic extension // Mathematical structures and modeling. 2019. V. 3(51). P. 5–20

    2019

  13. [21]

    Group theory and periodic system of elements // AIP Conference Proceed- ings

    Ostrovsky V.N. Group theory and periodic system of elements // AIP Conference Proceed- ings. 1996. V. 365. P. 191–216

    1996

  14. [22]

    n+l Filling Rule in the Periodic System and Focusing Poten- tials // JETP

    Demkov Yu.N., Ostrovsky V.N. n+l Filling Rule in the Periodic System and Focusing Poten- tials // JETP. 1972. V. 35. P. 66–69

    1972

  15. [23]

    Theory of the Periodic System

    Korableva T.P., Korolkov D.V. Theory of the Periodic System. Saint-Petersburg: Saint- Petersburg University Press, 2005

    2005

  16. [24]

    The helicoidal classification of the elements // Chemical News

    Janet C. The helicoidal classification of the elements // Chemical News. 1929. V. 138, P. 372– 374, 388–393

    1929

  17. [25]

    Regular Polytopes

    Coxeter H.S.M. Regular Polytopes. Dover, Mineola, 1974

    1974

  18. [26]

    Unitary Irreducible Representations of SU(2,2)

    Yao T. Unitary Irreducible Representations of SU(2,2). I // J. Math. Phys. 1967. V. 8. P. 1931–1954

    1967

  19. [27]

    Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines

    Zommerfeld A. Atomic Structure and Spectral Lines. Methuen Company, 1934

    1934

  20. [28]

    Spinor Structure and Internal Symmetries // Int

    Varlamov V.V. Spinor Structure and Internal Symmetries // Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2015. V. 54. P. 3533–3576; arXiv:1409.1400 [math-ph] (2014)

    2015 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Group Theoretical Description of the Periodic System // Symmetry

    Varlamov V.V., Pavlova L.D, Babushkina O.S. Group Theoretical Description of the Periodic System // Symmetry. 2022. V. 14. 137

    2022

  22. [30]

    Some Comments on the Periodic System of the Elements // Int

    L¨ owdin P.-O. Some Comments on the Periodic System of the Elements // Int. J. Quant. Chem. 1969. V. 3. P. 331–334

    1969

  23. [31]

    Shattered Symmetry: Group Theory from the Eightfold Way to the Periodic Table

    Thyssen P., Ceulemans A. Shattered Symmetry: Group Theory from the Eightfold Way to the Periodic Table. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Dynamic symmetry of atomic potential // J

    Ostrovsky V.N. Dynamic symmetry of atomic potential // J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 1981. V. 14. P. 4425–4439. 36

    1981

  25. [33]

    Group Theoretical Aspects of the Periodic Table of the Elements // Journal of Molecular Structure

    Novaro O. Group Theoretical Aspects of the Periodic Table of the Elements // Journal of Molecular Structure. 1989. V. 199. P. 103–118

    1989

  26. [34]

    The System of Elements from the Group-Theoretic Viewpoint // Novosibirsk

    Fet A.I. The System of Elements from the Group-Theoretic Viewpoint // Novosibirsk. 1979. 45 P. – (Prepr./USSR Academy of Sciences. Siberian Branch of the Institute of Applied Sciences of the USSR Academy of Sciences; No. 1)

    1979

  27. [35]

    The Madelung Numbers and the System of Chemical Elements / Group theoretical methods in physics, Zvenigorod, 1979

    Fet A.I. The Madelung Numbers and the System of Chemical Elements / Group theoretical methods in physics, Zvenigorod, 1979. – Moscow: Nauka, 1980. V. 1. P. 327. 37

    1979

Pith tools

Reviewed July 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.