Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 44 references

Two active antennas match twelve using binary-controlled parasitic elements

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · glm-5.2

2026-07-10 04:06 UTC pith:WRGO4THC

load-bearing objection The approximation concern is real but doesn't undermine the central claims: Algorithm 1 uses the exact model, and Algorithm 2's close performance validates the approximation empirically. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.08624 v1 pith:WRGO4THC submitted 2026-07-09 eess.SP

Parasitic MIMO Beamforming for Multi-Active Multi-Parasitic Antenna Arrays with Binary Control

Taejun Lee , Byunghyun Lee , Thomas E. Roth , David J. Love This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords parasitic antenna arraybinary controlMAMPESPARbeamforming codebooklimited feedbackeigenvalue perturbationgeneralized Lloyd algorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that a multi-active multi-parasitic (MAMP) antenna array, where each parasitic element is toggled between just two reactance states via simple RF switches rather than continuously tuned with varactors, can achieve beamforming performance approaching that of a fully active array with far more RF chains. The central mechanism is a quadratic approximation of the induced current vector as a function of the binary on-off state vector, which replaces an intractable matrix inverse with a polynomial form amenable to codebook optimization. Using this approximation, the authors design two transmit beamforming codebooks via the generalized Lloyd algorithm: an exhaustive-search version serving as a performance benchmark, and a low-complexity version based on eigenvalue perturbation for real-time adaptation. Through full-wave electromagnetic simulations and channel-model simulations, they show that a MAMP array with only two active antennas and sixteen binary-controlled parasitic elements can match the beamforming gain of a fully active array with up to twelve antennas under ideal Rayleigh fading and up to ten under realistic 3GPP urban-micro channels.

Core claim

The key finding is that the induced current vector in a parasitic antenna array, which normally requires a matrix inverse that couples the binary switch state to the radiation pattern, can be accurately approximated as a quadratic function of the binary control vector when the ON-state and OFF-state reactances are chosen to satisfy magnitude conditions on the self-impedance terms. This quadratic reformulation eliminates the need for per-combination matrix inversions and enables gradient-based optimization, making it feasible to design beamforming codebooks over the binary search space. The approximation error stays below approximately 5-10 percent for practical reactance values (x_on = 80 oh

What carries the argument

The quadratic current approximation in Eq. (24), which replaces the inverse-form current expression U(b) with a polynomial-form matrix tilde-U(b) that is quadratic in the binary vector b. This is derived via Taylor expansion of the Schur complement inverse under the assumption that the diagonal impedance magnitude is large relative to off-diagonal coupling terms. The second key machinery is the eigenvalue perturbation score s_k in Eq. (36), which estimates the marginal gain in the maximum generalized eigenvalue from switching on each parasitic antenna, enabling greedy selection rather than exhaustive search.

Load-bearing premise

The quadratic current approximation relies on a Taylor series truncation that requires the self-impedance magnitude to be sufficiently large relative to mutual coupling terms. The paper validates this for specific reactance values and when at most 25 percent of parasitic antennas are active, but some beamforming simulations push beyond this ratio, where the approximation error exceeds 10 percent.

What would settle it

If full-wave electromagnetic simulations or physical measurements showed that the quadratic current approximation produces radiation patterns that diverge significantly from actual patterns for the reactance values and array geometries used in the beamforming simulations, the performance claims would be undermined. The approximation is load-bearing: the codebook designs and their beamforming gains all depend on the polynomial current model being accurate.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Replacing varactor-based continuous tuning with binary RF switches could substantially lower the cost and control complexity of parasitic antenna arrays, making large-scale ESPAR-like architectures more practical for 6G deployments where RF chain count is a primary cost driver.
  • The quadratic-form current approximation could serve as a foundation for extending parasitic antenna techniques beyond beamforming into spatial multiplexing, where the polynomial structure may simplify the search for orthogonal radiation patterns.
  • The eigenvalue perturbation greedy algorithm, by requiring only one generalized eigenvalue problem per codeword instead of combinatorially many, makes online codebook adaptation feasible in mobile or rapidly varying channel environments where recomputation latency is critical.
  • The validation methodology of matching mathematical models to full-wave HFSS simulations for specific array geometries and reactance values provides a template for calibrating other compact antenna architectures where mutual coupling complicates theoretical predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quadratic approximation degrades as the ratio of ON-state parasitic antennas to total parasitic antennas increases beyond 0.25, where the Taylor series truncation error grows. This suggests a natural scaling limit: adding more parasitic antennas helps only if the fraction simultaneously active remains small, which could constrain the architecture for very large arrays.
  • The binary two-state approach trades the fine-grained pattern control of continuous varactor tuning for simplicity. In channels with very high angular resolution requirements, the quantization of reactance states may limit the achievable beamforming granularity compared to continuous tuning, though the paper does not directly test this boundary.
  • The circular subarray geometry chosen for its isotropic properties and uniform mutual coupling may not be optimal for all deployment scenarios. Sectorized or planar configurations could offer different trade-offs between pattern diversity and approximation accuracy that remain unexplored.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a multi-active multi-parasitic (MAMP) antenna architecture with binary-controlled parasitic elements, replacing varactor-based continuous reactance tuning with RF switches (PIN diodes or MEMS). The induced current vector is derived as a quadratic function of the binary control vector via Schur complement and Taylor series approximations. Practical reactance values (x_on=80 Ω, x_off=-1000 Ω) and array geometry parameters (r1=0.3λ, r2=0.9λ) are identified through HFSS full-wave simulations. Two codebook designs based on the generalized Lloyd algorithm are developed: an exhaustive search method (Algorithm 1) using the exact current model, and a low-complexity greedy method (Algorithm 2) using eigenvalue perturbation on the quadratic approximation. Simulations under i.i.d. Rayleigh and 3GPP UMi channels show that MAMP with 2 active antennas achieves beamforming performance comparable to fully active arrays with up to 12 antennas.

Significance. The paper addresses a practically important problem: reducing RF chain count in MIMO systems while maintaining beamforming capability. The combination of binary control (vs. continuous varactor tuning), HFSS-validated modeling, and communication-theoretic codebook design is novel and well-motivated. The quadratic current approximation enabling low-complexity codebook design via eigenvalue perturbation is a useful contribution. The HFSS validation of radiation patterns against the mathematical model, including identification of practical reactance values implementable with off-the-shelf components, adds practical credibility. The performance results showing 2 active antennas matching 10-12 fully active antennas are significant if the modeling assumptions hold.

major comments (3)
  1. Section VI-A, power constraint: The power constraint P_max is defined in Eq. (26) as P_tx = i^H Re{Z} i, and is set such that each active antenna in the reference case with N_a=2 transmits with unit power. However, for the MAMP array, the current vector i includes both active and parasitic currents, and the power dissipated in parasitic elements depends on the binary state b. It is unclear whether the power normalization ensures a fair comparison between MAMP and fully active arrays across different b configurations. The paper should clarify how P_max is applied consistently across all codewords and whether parasitic power dissipation is accounted for in the comparison.
  2. Section III-B and Section VI-B: The approximation error of the quadratic model in Eq. (24) is validated for N_on/N_p ≤ 0.25 (Fig. 5), with error below 10%. However, the beamforming simulations use N_on=6 with N_p=16 (ratio 0.375), where the error exceeds 10%. The paper acknowledges this in Section VI-B but does not quantify the impact on codebook optimality. While Algorithm 1 uses the exact model (10) for current reconstruction, the nearest-neighbor condition in Eq. (34) and the centroid optimization still rely on the quadratic approximation for Algorithm 2's score computation. The paper should either (a) provide HFSS validation for N_on=6 configurations, or (b) include a sensitivity analysis showing that the beamforming gain degradation from approximation error at N_on=6 is bounded and acceptable for the selection step even at N_on=6.
  3. Section III-C, Figs. 6-7: The HFSS validation covers only specific configurations: N_on=1 (Fig. 6) and N_on=4 (Fig. 7). The strongest performance claims in Section VI use N_on=6 with N_p=16. While the exact model (10) is standard circuit theory, the practical accuracy of the impedance matrix Z and the two-state reactance model at higher N_on has not been verified against full-wave simulations. Including at least one HFSS validation case with N_on=6 would strengthen the credibility of the N_on=6 results.
minor comments (7)
  1. Eq. (6): The matrix entries use indices up to M (Z_{1M}, Z_{M1}, Z_{MM}), but the total number of antennas is N = N_a + N_p. The index should be N, not M, to be consistent with the notation defined earlier.
  2. Section II-A, Eq. (2): The virtual channel representation is introduced without sufficient explanation of how K (number of angular bins) relates to N and M. A brief statement on the choice of K would help readers.
  3. Algorithm 1, Line 7: The text says 'Solve GEVP and find μ_max using (31)' but Eq. (31) defines the GEVP for i_a, not for μ_max directly. The phrasing could be clarified.
  4. Fig. 4: The y-axis label 'Avg Rel Error (%)' and the dual y-axes for x_on and x_off are somewhat confusing. Consider separating into two subplots or clarifying the axis mapping in the caption.
  5. Section VI-B: The statement 'Algorithm 1 provides an additional gain of approximately 0.1-0.3 dB over Algorithm 1 for B≤6' should read 'over Algorithm 2.'
  6. The abstract states 'only few active antennas' — this should be 'only a few active antennas' for grammatical correctness.
  7. Reference [1] is an arXiv preprint from 2025; if the paper has been published since submission, the reference should be updated to the published version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from standard circuit theory through explicit Taylor expansion, with parameters validated against external HFSS simulations and performance evaluated against independent channel models.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. (1) The current vector model (Eq. 5) is standard circuit theory (impedance matrix, mutual coupling). (2) The Schur complement decomposition (Eqs. 14–16) and Taylor series truncation (Eqs. 17–19) are explicit mathematical steps with clearly stated assumptions (|β|, |γ| sufficiently large). (3) The quadratic approximation ˜U(b) in Eq. (24) is derived, not defined in terms of the beamforming metric. (4) Reactance values x_on=80Ω, x_off=-1000Ω are optimized to minimize approximation error against HFSS full-wave electromagnetic simulations — an external benchmark, not the beamforming performance target. (5) Algorithm 1 (exhaustive search) uses the exact inverse-form current model from Eq. (10)/(11), making it approximation-free. Algorithm 2 uses the quadratic approximation only for the greedy selection scores s_k, then reconstructs the final current using the exact model. (6) Performance is evaluated against independent channel models (i.i.d. Rayleigh, 3GPP UMi via QuaDRiGa), not against any fitted quantity. No self-citation chain is load-bearing: references [31], [32], [41] for selection matrices, Schur complement, and eigenvalue perturbation are standard mathematical tools by different authors. The GLA framework (cited [37], [38]) is a known algorithm, extended here with a modified power constraint. No step reduces to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are physical quantities (reactances, geometries) tuned via HFSS simulation to minimize model error. The axioms are standard antenna theory assumptions plus truncation conditions specific to the binary-switching model.

free parameters (5)
  • x_on = 80 Ω
    ON-state reactance chosen to minimize approximation error while being implementable with a 5.3 nH inductor at 2.4 GHz (Section III-B, Fig. 4).
  • x_off = -1000 Ω
    OFF-state reactance chosen to minimize approximation error, corresponding to 66.3 fF capacitance at 2.4 GHz (Section III-B, Fig. 4).
  • r1 = 0.3λ
    Parasitic array radius selected via HFSS sweep to match mathematical and simulated radiation patterns (Section III-C, Fig. 6).
  • r2 = 0.9λ
    Active antenna spacing selected via HFSS sweep to match mathematical and simulated radiation patterns (Section III-C, Fig. 6).
  • N_on = 2, 4, or 6
    Constraint on number of ON-state parasitic antennas, chosen to balance approximation error and beamforming flexibility (Section III-B, Fig. 5).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Mutual coupling matrix Z is symmetric
    Used in Eq. (6) to partition Z into submatrices; standard in antenna theory for reciprocal media.
  • domain assumption All parasitic antennas have identical self-impedance and ON-state reactance
    Invoked in Eq. (17) to define scalar β; reasonable for identical elements but an idealization.
  • domain assumption ||B^{-1}CE^{-1}D|| < 1
    Stated after Eq. (15) to justify Taylor expansion of Schur complement; holds when OFF-state reactance is large.
  • domain assumption ||β^{-1}Z_p diag(b)|| < 1
    Invoked in Eq. (17)-(18) to justify Taylor expansion of B^{-1}; requires |β| sufficiently large relative to mutual coupling.
  • ad hoc to paper O(δ^{-3}) and O(γ^{-2}) terms are negligible
    Stated in Eqs. (18)-(19) and (20)-(21) to truncate the Taylor series; validated empirically for specific parameter values but not proven in general.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-glm · 25846 in / 2616 out tokens · 445514 ms · 2026-07-10T04:06:30.042377+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Parasitic MIMO Beamforming for Multi-Active Multi-Parasitic Antenna Arrays with Binary Control." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WRGO4THC

@misc{pith2026260708624,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Parasitic MIMO Beamforming for Multi-Active Multi-Parasitic Antenna Arrays with Binary Control},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WRGO4THC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08624}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In 6G, MIMO dimensions continue to scale, yet the increased cost, power consumption, and hardware complexity associated with growing RF chains limit practical deployment. Parasitic antennas offer a promising alternative that can add spatial degrees of freedom and array gain without a proportional increase in RF chains. From a communication perspective, prior work on parasitic antennas has primarily focused on adjusting continuous reactance values using varactors, but such varactor-based tuning has increased cost and complexity in the analog control and practical RF circuit design. This paper proposes a multi-active multi-parasitic antenna (MAMP) architecture with binary controllers, where each parasitic element operates in one of two discrete reactance states. To validate the practicality of the system, we experimentally identify array geometries that best match the actual radiation patterns with those of the mathematical model through HFSS simulations. We express the induced current vector as a quadratic function of the binary state vector, and propose a pair of discrete reactance values that minimize the relative error of the proposed model while being implementable with off-the-shelf RF components. With these results, we develop two transmit beamforming codebook designs based on the generalized Lloyd algorithm. The first design exhaustively searches for all possible binary combinations to find the optimal solution, representing the theoretical upper limits of our framework. The second design leverages eigenvalue perturbation to significantly reduce computational complexity, making it suitable for online adaptation. Extensive simulations under various channel scenarios demonstrate that the proposed codebook designs enable MAMP with only few active antennas to achieve beamforming performance comparable to fully active antenna arrays with significantly more active antennas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.08624 by Byunghyun Lee, David J. Love, Taejun Lee, Thomas E. Roth.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proposed MAMP array with Na = 2 and Np = 8 controller composed of RF switches and lumped passive components, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Azimuth beam steering by binary control r1 Parasitic antenna Active antenna r2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Configuration of MAMP Array where T0 = − 1 γ INp , Tk = VkP + 1 βγZpVk, Tkl = VkQVl , and Vk ∈ R Np×Np is a diagonal matrix with a unit entry at the k-th diagonal position and zeros elsewhere. The current vector i can also be expressed as a quadratic form in b, yielding i = U˜(b)ia =  INa T(b)Zap ia, (24) where U˜(b) is a matrix consisting of quadratic terms in b. While U(b) in (11) is expressed as an in… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Azimuth radiation patterns for different antenna [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Azimuth patterns for various (r1, r2) combinations with Non = 1, b = [1, 0, . . . , 0]T , and relative phase = 90◦ . The antenna array setup consists of Na active antennas, each surrounded by equally spaced Np parasitic antennas forming a circular array shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Beamforming gain versus B and Non under i.i.d. Rayleigh channel. B. i.i.d. Rayleigh channel model First, we evaluate the two proposed codebooks in terms of beamforming gain under an i.i.d. Rayleigh fading channel, which represents a highly rich scattering environment and offers a high diversity order. We set the number of iterations of the algorithm to three, which was sufficient to saturate the performanc… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Beamforming gain versus B and Non under 3GPP UMI NLOS Scenario. for B ≤ 6. These results indicate that, even under a practical channel model, eight low-cost switched parasitic antennas can effectively replace two to three additional active antennas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Tri-Hybrid MIMO Architecture

    R. W. Heath Jr, J. Carlson, N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castellanos, M. Akrout, and C.-B. Chae, “The Tri-Hybrid MIMO Architecture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21971, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Key focus areas and enabling technologies for 6G,

    C. G. Brinton, M. Chiang, K. T. Kim, D. J. Love, M. Beesley, M. Repeta, J. Roese, P. Beming, E. Ekudden, C. Liet al., “Key focus areas and enabling technologies for 6G,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 84–91, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    A tutorial on extremely large-scale MIMO for 6G: Fundamentals, signal processing, and applications,

    Z. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, S. Cui, B. Ai, M. Debbah, K. B. Letaief, and H. V . Poor, “A tutorial on extremely large-scale MIMO for 6G: Fundamentals, signal processing, and applications,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1560–1605, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Embracing Reconfigurable Antennas in the Tri-hybrid MIMO Architecture for 6G and Beyond

    M. R. Castellanos, S. Yang, C.-B. Chae, and R. W. Heath Jr, “Embracing Reconfigurable Antennas in the Tri-hybrid MIMO Architecture for 6G and Beyond,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16610, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,

    Q. Wu and R. Zhang, “Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming,”IEEE transactions on wireless communications, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5394–5409, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent re- flecting surface aided wireless network,

    ——, “Towards smart and reconfigurable environment: Intelligent re- flecting surface aided wireless network,”IEEE communications maga- zine, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 106–112, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Toward smart wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces: A contemporary survey,

    S. Gong, X. Lu, D. T. Hoang, D. Niyato, L. Shu, D. I. Kim, and Y .-C. Liang, “Toward smart wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces: A contemporary survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2283–2314, 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    RIS in Cellular Networks -- Challenges and Issues

    M. ˚Astr¨om, P. Gentner, O. Haliloglu, B. Makki, and O. Tageman, “RIS in Cellular Networks–Challenges and Issues,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04753, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Kalis, A

    A. Kalis, A. G. Kanatas, and C. B. Papadias,Parasitic antenna arrays for wireless MIMO systems. Springer, 2014

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Design of electronically steerable passive array radiator (ESPAR) antennas,

    K. Gyoda and T. Ohira, “Design of electronically steerable passive array radiator (ESPAR) antennas,” inIEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Transmitting Waves of Progress to the Next Millennium. 2000 Digest. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (C, vol. 2. IEEE, 2000, pp. 922–925

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    Analog beamforming using ESPAR for single-RF precoding systems,

    C. Zhang, S. Shen, Z. Han, and R. Murch, “Analog beamforming using ESPAR for single-RF precoding systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 4387–4400, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Low-complexity adaptive spatial processing of ESPAR antenna systems,

    J. C. B. Garcia, M. Kamoun, and A. Sibille, “Low-complexity adaptive spatial processing of ESPAR antenna systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 3700–3711, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Beamforming with hybrid reconfigurable parasitic antenna arrays

    N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castellanos, S. R. Khosravirad, J. Du, H. Viswanathan, and R. W. Heath Jr, “Beamforming with hybrid re- configurable parasitic antenna arrays,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17864, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Single- RF MIMO-OFDM using ESPAR,

    Z. Han, S. Shen, Y . Zhang, S. Tang, C.-Y . Chiu, and R. Murch, “Single- RF MIMO-OFDM using ESPAR,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 6080–6089, 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    MIMO over ESPAR with 16-QAM Modulation,

    B. Han, V . I. Barousis, C. B. Papadias, A. Kalis, and R. Prasad, “MIMO over ESPAR with 16-QAM Modulation,”IEEE Wireless Communica- tions Letters, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 687–690, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Spatial Multiplexing of OFDM Signals With QPSK Modulation Over ESPAR,

    J. Lee, J. Y . Lee, and Y . H. Lee, “Spatial Multiplexing of OFDM Signals With QPSK Modulation Over ESPAR,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 4914–4923, 2016

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Beamspace-domain analysis of single-rf front-end MIMO systems,

    V . I. Barousis, A. G. Kanatas, and A. Kalis, “Beamspace-domain analysis of single-rf front-end MIMO systems,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 1195–1199, 2011

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Charac- teristic mode analysis of ESPAR for single-RF MIMO systems,

    Z. Han, Y . Zhang, S. Shen, Y . Li, C.-Y . Chiu, and R. Murch, “Charac- teristic mode analysis of ESPAR for single-RF MIMO systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2353– 2367, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Switched parasitic antennas and controlled reactance parasitic antennas: A systems comparison,

    D. V . Thiel, “Switched parasitic antennas and controlled reactance parasitic antennas: A systems comparison,” inIEEE Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium, 2004., vol. 3. IEEE, 2004, pp. 3211– 3214

    work page 2004

  20. [20]

    Switched parasitic elements for antenna diversity,

    R. Vaughan, “Switched parasitic elements for antenna diversity,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 399–405, 2002

    work page 2002

  21. [21]

    D. V . Thiel and S. Smith,Switched parasitic antennas for cellular communications. Artech House, 2002

    work page 2002

  22. [22]

    MEMS-switched parasitic- antenna array for radiation pattern diversity,

    L. Petit, L. Dussopt, and J.-M. Laheurte, “MEMS-switched parasitic- antenna array for radiation pattern diversity,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2624–2631, 2006

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Energy efficient switched parasitic array antenna for 5G networks and IoT,

    A. Kausar, H. Mehrpouyan, M. Sellathurai, R. Qian, and S. Kausar, “Energy efficient switched parasitic array antenna for 5G networks and IoT,” in2016 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference (LAPC). IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–5

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    Deconstructing multiantenna fading channels,

    A. M. Sayeed, “Deconstructing multiantenna fading channels,”IEEE Transactions on Signal processing, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 2563–2579, 2002

    work page 2002

  25. [25]

    Performance limits of coded diversity methods for transmitter antenna arrays,

    A. Narula, M. D. Trott, and G. W. Wornell, “Performance limits of coded diversity methods for transmitter antenna arrays,”IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2418–2433, 2002

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    What is the value of limited feedback for MIMO channels?

    D. J. Love, R. W. Heath, W. Santipach, and M. L. Honig, “What is the value of limited feedback for MIMO channels?”IEEE communications magazine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 54–59, 2004

    work page 2004

  27. [27]

    Fast beamforming of electronically steerable parasitic array radiator antennas: Theory and experiment,

    C. Sun, A. Hirata, T. Ohira, and N. C. Karmakar, “Fast beamforming of electronically steerable parasitic array radiator antennas: Theory and experiment,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1819–1832, 2004

    work page 2004

  28. [28]

    An overview of limited feedback in wireless communication systems,

    D. J. Love, R. W. Heath, V . K. Lau, D. Gesbert, B. D. Rao, and M. An- drews, “An overview of limited feedback in wireless communication systems,”IEEE Journal on selected areas in Communications, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1341–1365, 2008

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    MIMO transmission for single- fed ESPAR with quantized loads,

    A. Li, C. Masouros, and C. B. Papadias, “MIMO transmission for single- fed ESPAR with quantized loads,”IEEE Transactions on Communica- tions, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 2863–2876, 2017

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Spectrally Efficient Pulse Shaping for Beamspace Space Shift Key- ing in Single-RF ESPAR Systems,

    Z. Han, S. Shen, Y . Zhang, S. Tang, C.-Y . Chiu, and R. Murch, “Spectrally Efficient Pulse Shaping for Beamspace Space Shift Key- ing in Single-RF ESPAR Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 10 548–10 560, 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Sensor selection for estimation with correlated measurement noise,

    S. Liu, S. P. Chepuri, M. Fardad, E. Mas ¸azade, G. Leus, and P. K. Varshney, “Sensor selection for estimation with correlated measurement noise,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 64, no. 13, pp. 3509–3522, 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Zhang,The Schur complement and its applications

    F. Zhang,The Schur complement and its applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006, vol. 4

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Dual-band WLAN dipole antenna using an internal matching circuit,

    Z. Zhang, M. F. Iskander, J.-C. Langer, and J. Mathews, “Dual-band WLAN dipole antenna using an internal matching circuit,”IEEE Trans- actions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1813–1818, 2005

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    The state of RF/microwave switches,

    P. Hindle, “The state of RF/microwave switches,”microwave journal, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 20–36, 2010

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    C. A. Balanis,Antenna theory: analysis and design. John wiley & sons, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Toward a circuit theory of communi- cation,

    M. T. Ivrla ˇc and J. A. Nossek, “Toward a circuit theory of communi- cation,”IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1663–1683, 2010

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Efficient use of side information in multiple-antenna data transmission over fading channels,

    A. Narula, M. J. Lopez, M. D. Trott, and G. W. Wornell, “Efficient use of side information in multiple-antenna data transmission over fading channels,”IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1423–1436, 2002

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    Design and analysis of transmit- beamforming based on limited-rate feedback,

    P. Xia and G. B. Giannakis, “Design and analysis of transmit- beamforming based on limited-rate feedback,”IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1853–1863, 2006

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    On the design of MIMO block-fading channels with feedback-link capacity constraint,

    V . Lau, Y . Liu, and T.-A. Chen, “On the design of MIMO block-fading channels with feedback-link capacity constraint,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2004

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    S. P. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex optimization. Cambridge university press, 2004

    work page 2004

  41. [41]

    First-order perturbation theory for eigenvalues and eigenvectors,

    A. Greenbaum, R.-c. Li, and M. L. Overton, “First-order perturbation theory for eigenvalues and eigenvectors,”SIAM review, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 463–482, 2020

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    QuaDRiGa: A 3-D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,

    S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B ¨orner, and L. Thiele, “QuaDRiGa: A 3-D multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials,”IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3242–3256, 2014

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    QuaDRiGa-quasi deterministic radio channel generator, user manual and documentation,

    S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B ¨orner, L. Thiele, F. Burkhardt, and E. Eberlein, “QuaDRiGa-quasi deterministic radio channel generator, user manual and documentation,” 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (Release 16),

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz (Release 16),” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 38.901, V16.1.0, 2020

    work page 2020