Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 51 references

High density two-component glasses of organic semiconductors prepared by physical vapor deposition

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-13 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Co-deposited NPD:TPD glasses reach 1.6% higher density and elevated thermal stability across every composition, tracking the same reduced-temperature rules as single-component PVD glasses.

desk verdict First solid density numbers for co-deposited OLED glasses; surface-equilibration picture holds across the full NPD:TPD composition range. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.08881 v1 pith:WZKBPSTF submitted 2026-07-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yejung Lee , Shinian Cheng , M. D. Ediger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords physicalvapordepositionorganicsemiconductorstwo-componentglassessurfaceequilibrationdensitythermalstabilitybirefringenceNPDTPD
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

OLED and organic-semiconductor layers are almost always multi-component glasses made by physical vapor deposition, yet almost everything known about density, stability and molecular orientation comes from single-component films. This paper shows that co-deposited mixtures of the two common hole-transport molecules NPD and TPD form high-density glasses (up to 1.6% denser than the corresponding liquid-cooled glass) with raised onset temperatures for the entire composition range, including dilute and equimolar blends. Density and kinetic stability both peak when the substrate is held near 0.85 of the mixture glass-transition temperature, and birefringence collapses onto the same reduced-temperature master curve used for the pure materials. When a dense mixed glass is annealed, the liquid grows as a constant-velocity front that starts at the free surface, exactly as in single-component ultrastable glasses. All of these observations are presented as direct consequences of surface equilibration during deposition. The result supplies the first quantitative density data for any co-deposited organic-semiconductor glass and indicates that the design rules already used for pure films can be carried over to the mixed layers that actually appear in devices.

What carries the argument

Surface equilibration during physical vapor deposition: high molecular mobility at the free surface allows newly arriving molecules to settle into low-energy packing before they are buried, so that substrate temperature relative to Tg sets density, kinetic stability and orientation even in multi-component films.

What would settle it

Repeat the identical dilatometry protocol on a second, independently prepared set of NPD:TPD films of known composition and show that the extracted density increases fall below ~0.5% or become irreproducible, or that the same model yields reproducible high densities for a non-ideal pair such as TPD/m-MTDATA.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Co-vapor-deposited NPD:TPD glasses of every composition form films whose density is up to 1.6% higher and whose onset temperature is elevated by as much as 7% relative to the liquid-cooled glass of the same composition; both quantities, together with birefringence, are controlled by the reduced substrate temperature Tsub/Tg of the mixture and are quantitatively consistent with the surface-equilibration mechanism established for single-component PVD glasses.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion of ellipsometric thickness into relative density assumes that a simple uniaxial Cauchy model remains accurate for multi-component films, an assumption the authors note fails for other co-deposited pairs.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Device layers deposited near 0.85 Tg of the mixture should inherit the same density and stability gains previously documented only for pure NPD or TPD.
  • Birefringence (and therefore molecular orientation) of mixed host–guest films can be predicted from the pure-component birefringence curves evaluated at the mixture’s reduced temperature.
  • In a multilayer stack with no free surface the kinetic stability of the co-deposited glass will be even higher than the already elevated Tonset measured here.
  • Charge mobility and photostability of mixed organic-semiconductor layers are expected to improve with the measured density increases, by analogy with single-component results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because NPD and TPD form a thermodynamically ideal mixture, the surface-equilibration picture may still need testing on non-ideal or partially demixing co-deposited pairs before it can be treated as universal for all OLED host–guest systems.
  • If density truly controls mobility as strongly as reported for neat NPD, a 1.5% denser mixed film could produce order-of-magnitude gains in charge transport without any change in molecular structure.
  • The constant-velocity front transformation implies that buried interfaces inside a device stack may act as additional nucleation sites, offering a practical route to engineer lifetime by interface design.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports the first relative-density measurements for co-deposited organic-semiconductor glasses, using in-situ spectroscopic ellipsometry on NPD:TPD mixtures across the full composition range and a wide span of substrate temperatures. The authors find that as-deposited films can be up to ~1.6 % denser than the corresponding liquid-cooled glasses, with elevated onset temperatures (Tonset/Tg up to ~1.07). Density and kinetic stability both maximize near Tsub/Tg ≈ 0.85, birefringence collapses onto a common Tsub/Tg master curve that is quantitatively predicted by a previously proposed mixing rule, and isothermal annealing of a dense 50:50 glass shows constant-velocity front propagation from free surface and substrate. DSC establishes that the binary system is thermodynamically ideal (single Tg, activity coefficients near unity, Gordon–Taylor and Schröder–van Laar fits). All observations are interpreted within the surface-equilibration mechanism previously established for single-component PVD glasses.

Significance. The work fills a clear gap: multi-component layers are ubiquitous in OLEDs, yet prior co-deposition studies reported only kinetic stability and never relative density. Demonstrating that high density, elevated Tonset, anisotropic packing, and front-mediated transformation all survive co-deposition, and that they track reduced substrate temperature exactly as in neat glasses, supplies a practical design rule for mixed host/emitter films. The deliberate choice of an ideal-mixing pair with nearly identical molecular shape and birefringence curves, together with internal consistency checks (Tg from thickness vs refractive-index kink agree to <0.7 K; composition controlled to ±0.02 by Tg reproducibility), makes the density percentages credible for this system even though the same ellipsometric model failed for other pairs. The isothermal front-growth experiment further corroborates that these are genuine high-stability glasses. The results are therefore both mechanistically informative and device-relevant.

minor comments (5)
  1. Figure 2 and the associated text report density increases of up to 1.5–1.6 % without quantified uncertainties or error bars. A brief statement of the typical thickness precision (or standard deviation across replicate films) would strengthen the central claim.
  2. The abstract and main text use both “1.5 %” and “1.6 %” for the maximum density increase; a single consistent value should be chosen.
  3. Figure 5 caption quotes front velocities as 0.37*10^-4 nm/sec; the units and scientific notation are unconventional and should be standardized (e.g., 3.7 × 10^-5 nm s^-1).
  4. In the discussion of the birefringence mixing rule the authors note that weight fraction was used instead of volume fraction; a short clause confirming that the densities of the two pure glasses are nearly identical would make the approximation transparent.
  5. Supporting Information Figure S1 panels are labeled (a)–(d) but the main-text reference to “Figure S1” does not specify which compositions are shown; a one-sentence clarification would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: density, Tonset, birefringence and front-propagation data are independent ellipsometric observables; surface-equilibration narrative and prior mixing rule are interpretive tests, not inputs that force the results by construction.

full rationale

The paper’s central claims rest on direct spectroscopic-ellipsometry measurements of film thickness (hence relative density and Tf), Tonset, and birefringence (nz–nxy) for co-deposited NPD:TPD films across composition and Tsub. These quantities are extracted from temperature-ramping dilatometry and room-temperature mapping with a uniaxial Cauchy model; they do not depend on any fitted parameter that is later re-labeled a prediction, nor on a self-definitional loop. The surface-equilibration mechanism is invoked only as a post-hoc consistency check (density and stability both peak near 0.85 Tg; Tf approaches Tsub above ~0.92 Tg; transformation fronts initiate at the free surface). The birefringence mixing rule taken from the authors’ prior Cheng et al. work is likewise tested against new multi-composition data rather than assumed; agreement is reported as empirical support, not as a forced identity. DSC confirmation of ideal mixing (single Tg, activity coefficients ~1, Gordon–Taylor and Schröder–van Laar fits) is an independent thermal measurement. No equation in the manuscript reduces a claimed “prediction” to its own input by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation to forbid alternatives. The acknowledged limitation of the ellipsometric density extraction for other co-deposited pairs is methodological, not circular. Consequently the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and scores 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental practice plus the previously established surface-equilibration mechanism and the measured ideal-mixing behavior of NPD:TPD. No new free parameters are fitted to force the density or stability trends; the only modeling choice that is load-bearing is the ellipsometric conversion of thickness to density.

free parameters (1)
  • deposition rate = 0.18–0.24 nm/s
    Fixed at ~0.2 nm s⁻¹ for all films; not varied, but the location of the density maximum is known from prior work to shift with rate.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Surface equilibration mechanism: freshly deposited molecules remain mobile only near the free surface and can pack toward lower-energy configurations before being buried.
    Invoked throughout the discussion and abstract as the unifying explanation; taken from the single-component literature (Ediger, Swallen et al.).
  • domain assumption NPD and TPD form a thermodynamically ideal mixture (activity coefficients ≈ 1, single Tg, Gordon–Taylor and Schröder–van Laar fits).
    Established by the DSC measurements in Figure 4; used to argue that packing rules remain composition-independent.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniaxial Cauchy model converts ellipsometric Psi/Delta into absolute thickness and birefringence for multi-component films.
    Assumed valid for NPD:TPD because the molecules are similar; the authors note the same model failed for other pairs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High density two-component glasses of organic semiconductors prepared by physical vapor deposition." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WZKBPSTF

@misc{pith2026260708881,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High density two-component glasses of organic semiconductors prepared by physical vapor deposition},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WZKBPSTF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.08881}
}
read the original abstract

Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) is widely utilized for the production of organic semiconductor devices due to its ability to form thin layers with exceptional properties. Although the layers in the device usually consist of two or more components, there is limited understanding about the fundamental characteristics of such multi-component vapor-deposited glasses. Here, spectroscopic ellipsometry was employed to characterize the densities, thermal stabilities and optical properties of co-vapor deposited NPD and TPD glasses across the entire range of composition. We find that co-deposited NPD and TPD form high density glasses with enhanced thermal stability. The dependences of density and stability upon substrate temperature are correlated, and the birefringence of the co-deposited glasses is determined by the reduced substrate temperature of mixtures. Additionally, we observe that the transformation of a highly stable and dense two component glass into its supercooled liquid initiates from the free surface and propagates into the bulk at constant velocity, like single component PVD glasses. All these features are consistent with the surface equilibration mechanism.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Shibata, Y

    M. Shibata, Y . Sakai, D. Yokoyama, Advantages and disadvantages of vacuum-deposited and spin-coated amorphous organic semiconductor films for organic light-emitting diodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 3, 11178-11191 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Yokoyama, Molecular orientation in small -molecule organic light -emitting diodes

    D. Yokoyama, Molecular orientation in small -molecule organic light -emitting diodes. Journal of Materials Chemistry 21, 19187-19202 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    Frischeisen, D

    J. Frischeisen, D. Yokoyama, A. Endo, C. Adachi, W. Brütting, Increased light outcoupling efficiency in dye -doped small molecule organic light -emitting diodes with horizontally oriented emitters. Organic Electronics 12, 809-817 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    C. Mayr, M. Taneda, C. Adachi, W. Brütting, Different orientation of the transition dipole moments of two similar Pt (II) complexes and their potential for high efficiency organic light-emitting diodes. Organic Electronics 15, 3031-3037 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Ràfols -Ribé et al

    J. Ràfols -Ribé et al. , High -performance organic light -emitting diodes comprising ultrastable glass layers. Science advances 4, eaar8332 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    M. D. Ediger, Perspective: Highly stable vapor-deposited glasses. The Journal of chemical physics 147, (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    M. D. Ediger, C. A. Angell, S. R. Nagel, Supercooled liquids and glasses. The journal of physical chemistry 100, 13200-13212 (1996)

    1996

  8. [8]

    S. F. Swallen et al., Organic glasses with exceptional thermodynamic and kinetic stability. Science 315, 353-356 (2007)

    2007

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Yokoyama, Y

    D. Yokoyama, Y . Setoguchi, A. Sakaguchi, M. Suzuki, C. Adachi, Orientation control of linear‐shaped molecules in vacuum ‐deposited organic amorphous films and its effect on carrier mobilities. Advanced Functional Materials 20, 386-391 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Jin et al

    Y . Jin et al. , Glasses denser than the supercooled liquid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2100738118 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    S. S. Dalal, A. Sepúlveda, G. K. Pribil, Z. Fakhraai, M. D. Ediger, Density and birefringence of a highly stable α, α, β-trisnaphthylbenzene glass. The Journal of chemical physics 136, (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    S. S. Dalal, D. M. Walters, I. Lyubimov, J. J. de Pablo, M. D. Ediger, Tunable molecular orientation and elevated thermal stability of vapor -deposited organic semiconductors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 4227-4232 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Rodriguez-Tinoco, M

    C. Rodriguez-Tinoco, M. Gonzalez-Silveira, M. A. Ramos, J. Rodriguez-Viejo, Ultrastable glasses: new perspectives for an old problem. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 45, 325-406 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    D. M. Walters, L. Antony, J. J. de Pablo, M. D. Ediger, Influence of molecular shape on the thermal stability and molecular orientation of vapor-deposited organic semiconductors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 3380-3386 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    K. L. Kearns, S. F. Swallen, M. D. Ediger, T. Wu, L. Yu, Influence of substrate temperature on the stability of glasses prepared by vapor deposition. The Journal of chemical physics 127, (2007)

    2007

  8. [16]

    K. R. Whitaker, D. J. Scifo, M. D. Ediger, M. Ahrenberg, C. Schick, Highly stable glasses of cis-decalin and cis/trans -decalin mixtures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 117, 12724-12733 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    A. N. Raegen, J. Yin, Q. Zhou, J. A. Forrest, Ultrastable monodisperse polymer glass formed by physical vapour deposition. Nature materials 19, 1110-1113 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Rodríguez-Tinoco, M

    C. Rodríguez-Tinoco, M. Gonzalez-Silveira, J. Ràfols-Ribé, A. F. Lopeandía, J. Rodríguez- Viejo, Transformation kinetics of vapor -deposited thin film organic glasses: the role of stability and molecular packing anisotropy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 17, 31195-31201 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    Bhattacharya, V

    D. Bhattacharya, V . Sadtchenko, Enthalpy and high temperature relaxation kinetics of stable vapor-deposited glasses of toluene. The Journal of Chemical Physics 141, (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Ràfols-Ribé, M

    J. Ràfols-Ribé, M. Gonzalez-Silveira, C. Rodríguez-Tinoco, J. Rodríguez-Viejo, The role of thermodynamic stability in the characteristics of the devitrification front of vapour - deposited glasses of toluene. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 19, 11089 -11097 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    S. E. Wolf et al., Role of molecular layering in the enhanced mechanical properties of stable glasses. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 3360-3368 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Tangpatjaroen, K

    C. Tangpatjaroen, K. Bagchi, R. A. Martinez, D. Grierson, I. Szlufarska, Mechanical properties of structure -tunable, vapor -deposited TPD glass. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 122, 27775-27781 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    K. L. Kearns, T. Still, G. Fytas, M. D. Ediger, High‐modulus organic glasses prepared by physical vapor deposition. Advanced Materials 1, 39-42 (2009)

    2009

  16. [24]

    Y . Qiu, M. E. Bieser, M. D. Ediger, Dense Glass Packing Can Slow Reactions with an Atmospheric Gas. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 123, 10124-10130 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Y . Qiu, L. W. Antony, J. J. de Pablo, M. D. Ediger, Photostability can be significantly modulated by molecular packing in glasses. Journal of the American Chemical Society 138, 11282-11289 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    Yu, Surface mobility of molecular glasses and its importance in physical stability

    L. Yu, Surface mobility of molecular glasses and its importance in physical stability. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 100, 3-9 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Berthier, P

    L. Berthier, P. Charbonneau, E. Flenner, F. Zamponi, Origin of ultrastability in vapor - deposited glasses. Physical review letters 119, 188002 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    ideal glass

    M. S. Beasley, C. Bishop, B. J. Kasting, M. D. Ediger, Vapor -deposited ethylbenzene glasses approach “ideal glass” density. The journal of physical chemistry letters 10, 4069- 4075 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Luo et al., High-density stable glasses formed on soft substrates

    P. Luo et al., High-density stable glasses formed on soft substrates. Nature Materials, 1-7 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Tanaka, M

    M. Tanaka, M. Auffray, H. Nakanotani, C. Adachi, Spontaneous formation of metastable orientation with well-organized permanent dipole moment in organic glassy films. Nature Materials 21, 819-825 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    M. J. Jurow et al., Understanding and predicting the orientation of heteroleptic phosphors in organic light-emitting materials. Nature materials 15, 85-91 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Yokoyama, K

    D. Yokoyama, K. i. Nakayama, T. Otani, J. Kido, Wide -range refractive index control of organic semiconductor films toward advanced optical design of organic optoelectronic devices. Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) 24, 6368-6373 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    Esaki, T

    Y . Esaki, T. Komino, T. Matsushima, C. Adachi, Enhanced electrical properties and air stability of amorphous organic thin films by engineering film density. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 8, 5891-5897 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    K. J. Dawson, K. L. Kearns, M. D. Ediger, M. J. Sacchetti, G. D. Zografi, Highly stable indomethacin glasses resist uptake of water vapor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 113, 2422-2427 (2009)

    2009

  27. [35]

    S. He, E. Pakhomenko, R. J. Holmes, Process Engineered Spontaneous Orientation Polarization in Organic Light-Emitting Devices. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15, 1652-1660 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Pakhomenko, S

    E. Pakhomenko, S. He, R. J. Holmes, Understanding and engineering spontaneous orientation polarization in organic light -emitting devices. Chemical Physics Reviews 4, (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    M. S. Ki et al., Improved thermal stability and operational lifetime of blue fluorescent organic light-emitting diodes by using a mixed-electron transporting layer. ACS Materials Letters 4, 1676-1683 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Tenopala-Carmona et al., Identification of the Key Parameters for Horizontal Transition Dipole Orientation in Fluorescent and TADF Organic Light -Emitting Diodes

    F. Tenopala-Carmona et al., Identification of the Key Parameters for Horizontal Transition Dipole Orientation in Fluorescent and TADF Organic Light -Emitting Diodes. Adv Mater 33, e2100677 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Cheng, Y

    S. Cheng, Y . Lee, J. Yu, L. Yu, M. D. Ediger, Surface equilibration mechanism controls the stability of a model codeposited glass mixture of organic semiconductors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 14, 4297-4303 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Cheng, Y

    S. Cheng, Y . Lee, J. Yu, L. Yu, M. D. Ediger, Generic Behavior of Ultrastability and Anisotropic Molecular Packing in Codeposited Organic Semiconductor Glass Mixtures. Chemistry of Materials, (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Zhang, L

    W. Zhang, L. Yu, Surface diffusion of polymer glasses. Macromolecules 49, 731 -735 (2016)

    2016

  34. [42]

    Wang et al

    L.-M. Wang et al. , Glass transition in binary eutectic systems: Best glass -forming composition. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114, 12080-12084 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Tu et al., Unveiling the dependence of glass transitions on mixing thermodynamics in miscible systems

    W. Tu et al., Unveiling the dependence of glass transitions on mixing thermodynamics in miscible systems. Scientific Reports 5, 8500 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Gordon, J

    M. Gordon, J. S. Taylor, Ideal copolymers and the second ‐order transitions of synthetic rubbers. I. Non‐crystalline copolymers. Journal of Applied Chemistry 2, 493-500 (1952)

    1952

  37. [45]

    Léonard, P

    S. Léonard, P. Harrowell, Macroscopic facilitation of glassy relaxation kinetics: Ultrastable glass films with frontlike thermal response. The Journal of chemical physics 133, (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    S. S. Dalal, M. D. Ediger, Influence of substrate temperature on the transformation front velocities that determine thermal stability of vapor -deposited glasses. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 119, 3875-3882 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Flenner, L

    E. Flenner, L. Berthier, P. Charbonneau, C. J. Fullerton, Front -mediated melting of isotropic ultrastable glasses. Physical review letters 123, 175501 (2019)

    2019

  40. [48]

    Ràfols-Ribé et al., Kinetic arrest of front transformation to gain access to the bulk glass transition in ultrathin films of vapour -deposited glasses

    J. Ràfols-Ribé et al., Kinetic arrest of front transformation to gain access to the bulk glass transition in ultrathin films of vapour -deposited glasses. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 20, 29989-29995 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Lampe et al., Dependence of phosphorescent emitter orientation on deposition technique in doped organic films

    T. Lampe et al., Dependence of phosphorescent emitter orientation on deposition technique in doped organic films. Chemistry of Materials 28, 712-715 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Frischeisen, D

    J. Frischeisen, D. Yokoyama, C. Adachi, W. Brütting, Determination of molecular dipole orientation in doped fluorescent organic thin films by photoluminescence measurements. Applied Physics Letters 96, (2010)

    2010

  43. [51]

    Bishop, T

    C. Bishop, T. J. Ferron et al., Eds. (ACS, Chemistry of Materials, 2024). S1 Supporting Information for High density two-component glasses of organic semiconductors prepared by physical vapor deposition. Yejung Lee1, Shinian Cheng1, and M. D. Ediger*,1 1Department of Chemistry...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed July 13, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.