Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 80 references

Global continuation finds and tracks practically all attractors in parallel, with their response to finite perturbations, as a complement to traditional local bifurcation analysis for multistable and tipping systems.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 03:48 UTC pith:37EK64TB

load-bearing objection Solid, usable methods paper that packages basin-map continuation into a practical complement to classical bifurcation tools, with open code and honest limits.

arxiv 2607.09332 v1 pith:37EK64TB submitted 2026-07-10 nlin.CD cs.NAmath.DSmath.NAphysics.app-ph

Global continuation as a complement to traditional continuation and bifurcation analysis

George Datseris , Andreas Morr , Muhammed Fadera , Juergen Kurths This is my paper
classification nlin.CD cs.NAmath.DSmath.NAphysics.app-ph
keywords global continuationmultistabilitybasin stabilitycritical transitionstipping pointsnonlocal stabilityattractorsbifurcation analysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that traditional local continuation—tracking one fixed point or cycle at a time with linear stability—is a poor fit for multistable models of ecosystems, power grids, climate elements, and neurons, where large perturbations and coexisting states decide whether a system tips. It introduces global continuation: a procedure that uses a basin map to locate attractors across the state space, continues them together along any prescribed parameter curve, matches them by user-chosen similarity, and reports nonlocal measures such as basin fractions and critical shocks. The focus is on the operating states and observables a practitioner cares about, not on unstable branches or expert branch-switching. The method is formalized as Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match, illustrated on neural networks, predator–prey systems, cloud models, power grids, and discontinuous mechanics, and released in open software so non-specialists can run it with little intervention.

Core claim

Global continuation, implemented as Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match, finds and continues in parallel practically all attractors of a dynamical system over a prescribed parameter curve by seeding near known attractors, remapping sampled initial conditions with a basin map, matching attractors by a configurable similarity measure, and accumulating basin and stability quantifiers—including responses to finite perturbations—so that multistability and tipping-relevant resilience can be read off without manual local-branch management.

What carries the argument

Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match (ASCM) driven by a basin map B: at each parameter step, seed near previously found attractors, sample further initial conditions, map them with B to attractors (or operating states), match those attractors to prior ones by a similarity measure (default: centroid distance), and record basin fractions plus other local and nonlocal stability quantifiers.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes a tractable basin map that, with the chosen samples and finite integration times, correctly sorts initial conditions into the attractors or operating states of interest without mistaking long transients for attractors or missing basins that are smaller than the sampling resolution.

What would settle it

On a low-dimensional multistable system whose attractors and basin volumes are known independently, ASCM with default sampling either systematically mislabels or misses an attractor whose basin fraction is well above one over the sample size, or produces basin fractions that fail to converge to the known volumes as the sample size is increased.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Safe operating regions and tipping likelihoods can be read from multiparameter continuations (including Hilbert curves) without hunting individual branches.
  • Parameter uncertainty and prescribed real-world parameter paths become ordinary inputs via Monte Carlo ensembles of curves.
  • Attractors that share a functional role can be aggregated so that stability is measured for modes of operation (e.g., survival vs extinction), not for single orbits.
  • Systems with discontinuities, chaotic attractors, or many global bifurcations can be continued without specialized shooting or constant restarts.
  • Applied users without deep continuation expertise can obtain multistability and resilience diagrams from a short, transparent workflow.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If high-dimensional basin maps keep improving, global continuation is likely to become the default first pass, with local continuation used mainly to refine unstable organizers seeded from the found attractors.
  • Using aggregated basin fractions as likelihoods for Bayesian parameter updates points to a broader workflow in which observed operating modes reshape priors over multiparameter spaces.
  • The same matching-and-aggregation machinery could be applied after the fact to existing large ensembles of simulations that were never designed as continuations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces global continuation, formalized via the Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match (ASCM) algorithm, as a practical complement to traditional local (Newton-based) continuation and bifurcation analysis. Using a basin map B that partitions initial conditions under the system flow Φ, ASCM finds and tracks (practically) all coexisting attractors in parallel over an arbitrary prescribed parameter curve, while recording basin fractions and a suite of local and nonlocal stability quantifiers (minimal critical shock, convergence pace, etc.). Matching of attractors across parameter steps is user-configurable and can be based on set distance or basin enclosure; attractors can also be aggregated by practitioner-chosen observables. Three basin maps (recurrences-based, featurize-and-group, proximity) are supplied, limitations (transients, high-dimensional scaling, feature choice) are stated, and the method is demonstrated on RNNs/ESNs, predator–prey multiparameter Hilbert scans, cloud-model climate scenarios with uncertainty, power-grid networks with global bifurcations, and a discontinuous vibro-impact system. An open-source implementation in DynamicalSystems.jl is provided together with extensive comparisons (SI3, SI4) and historical context (SI5).

Significance. If the method performs as claimed, it supplies a genuinely useful, accessible tool for the large applied community that studies multistability and tipping (climate, ecology, power grids, neuroscience, ML). The parallel tracking of all attractors, preservation of the flow (hence basin volumes and critical shocks), support for chaotic and discontinuous systems, continuation over arbitrary/Hilbert curves, and aggregation by functional observables address real pain points of local continuation that the paper correctly identifies. The open, modern software implementation and the breadth of reproducible examples (including cases where local tools require heavy intervention or fail) are concrete strengths that lower the barrier for non-experts. The work is correctly scoped as a complement rather than a replacement, and the limitations section is candid. These features make the contribution significant for both methodology and practice in nonlinear dynamics.

minor comments (6)
  1. Fig. 1 caption and panels: the light-blue annotations are helpful but dense; a short legend or numbered call-outs would improve readability for readers new to both methods.
  2. §5.1 (featurize-and-group): a brief practical note on how to diagnose that chosen features have become inadequate mid-continuation (and how to re-run with updated features) would help applied users.
  3. Table 1 and Methods 5.3: the list of quantifiers is valuable; adding one-sentence pointers to the precise software function names (already present in the ecosystem) would make the table immediately actionable.
  4. SI4 multiparameter comparison: the statement that global continuation required “two to three times” the points of the local manifold charts is useful; a short table of wall-clock times for the same predator–prey example would make the scaling discussion more concrete.
  5. Throughout: a few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “Global bifurcation is fundamentally different” in §3.3 should read “Global continuation”; occasional missing spaces after periods). A light copy-edit pass would polish the text.
  6. Code snippet §5.4: the Hilbert-curve construction and aggregation example are excellent; adding a one-line comment that the same pcurve can be replaced by any user-supplied sequence of parameter vectors would further emphasize flexibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: ASCM is a self-contained algorithmic proposal whose outputs are defined by the procedure, not derived from fitted inputs or load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The paper proposes and specifies a computational procedure (Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match / ASCM, Fig. 2 and Methods 5.1–5.4) that uses a basin map B, sampling set S, and optional matching/aggregation rules to track attractors and practitioner-chosen quantifiers over a parameter curve. Its claims are that this procedure finds (practically) all attractors in parallel, preserves flow/basin structure, and yields nonlocal stability measures useful for multistability and tipping analysis; these are demonstrated on open examples (ESN, predator-prey Hilbert, power grid, vibro-impact, cloud model) and compared to local continuation (SI3–SI4). There is no derivation of a numerical prediction from a fitted parameter, no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors that forbids alternatives, and no ansatz smuggled in as external fact. Self-citations in SI5 are explicitly historical scaffolding for how basin maps and earlier continuation variants evolved; the present ASCM algorithm, matching, Hilbert multiparameter curves, aggregation, and quantifier suite are independently specified and implemented in DynamicalSystems.jl. Limitations of B (transients, small basins, high dimension) are stated openly (§4.1). The method is therefore self-contained against its own definition and external benchmarks; circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 3 axioms · 2 invented entities

The paper is a methods contribution. Its load-bearing content is algorithmic definitions plus the empirical claim that the algorithms work on the showcased systems. Free parameters are the usual numerical thresholds of basin maps and matching; axioms are standard dynamical-systems notions plus the finite-time computational idealizations required by any basin estimator; the invented entities are the named procedures themselves.

free parameters (3)
  • matching distance threshold r
    User-chosen cutoff beyond which two attractors are never matched (Methods 5.2); controls continuity of labels.
  • basin-map metaparameters (ε, Ttr, T, clustering threshold, feature templates)
    Control attractor identification accuracy and computational cost for both recurrences and featurize-and-group maps (Methods 5.1); must be tuned per system.
  • sampling set S density / number of initial conditions n
    Determines the probability 1-(1-f)^n of discovering an attractor of basin fraction f (SI3); free design choice.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Attractors and basins can be meaningfully defined and distinguished in finite time under a numerical flow Φ.
    Stated in §2.2; required for any computational basin map.
  • domain assumption Poincaré recurrence (or feature similarity) correctly identifies long-term behavior for the chosen tessellation/feature set.
    Underlying the recurrences and featurize-and-group maps (Methods 5.1).
  • standard math Standard numerical ODE/map integrators approximate the true flow to sufficient accuracy.
    Implicit throughout; no special analysis of integrator error is given.
invented entities (2)
  • Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match (ASCM) algorithm independent evidence
    purpose: Concrete procedure that turns any basin map into a parallel global continuation with matching and quantifier tracking.
    Core algorithmic contribution of the paper (Fig. 2).
  • Global continuation (as formalized complement to local continuation) independent evidence
    purpose: Named methodological framework that tracks all attractors and nonlocal stability over parameter curves.
    Central conceptual claim of the abstract and §2; builds on but re-packages earlier Monte-Carlo basin ideas.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 31715 in / 2567 out tokens · 32993 ms · 2026-07-13T03:48:54.161450+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multistable dynamical systems are ever-prevalent, used to model for example ecosystems, power grids, climate elements, neurons, and more. When perturbed, such systems may ``tip'' from one state of operation to another, often with abrupt, irreversible, and high-impact consequences in each context. Traditionally, these systems are analysed via bifurcation diagrams, the result of a process we refer to as \emph{local continuation}, as it only captures the linear (local) system response to infinitesimal perturbations. Local continuation requires substantial expertise, constant interventions, and may yield inaccurate assessment of the system's response to large perturbations that is crucial for tipping analysis. To address some inherent challenges of local continuation and to provide fundamentally new information during a continuation, this paper introduces \emph{global continuation} as a complement suitable for the study of multistability, critical transitions and real-world-oriented applications. Global continuation finds and continues in parallel (practically) all system attractors and their response to finite perturbations by synthesising information from the whole state space, while placing a focus on the qualities or observables of a dynamical system that the practitioner cares about in context. Global continuation does not require deep expertise and is effortless to use and troubleshoot, making it attractive to applied scientists from different disciplines. We highlight several unique advantages that allow global continuation to complement the status quo and exemplify them through a plethora of representative examples. Global continuation is also implemented as open source software in DynamicalSystems.jl, enhancing its accessibility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09332 by Andreas Morr, George Datseris, Juergen Kurths, Muhammed Fadera.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: High level comparison between traditional (local) continuation and bifurcation analysis and global continuation. Both techniques are applied to a three-dimensional neuronal mass model (details provided in Supplementary Information, SI6). Panels (a, b, e) plot the maximum of one of the model variables. Panel (b) should be compared with panel (e), the latter showing only the attracting states of the system. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Global continuation algorithm Attractors-Seed-Continue-Match (ASCM). Inputs: (1) B, the basin map that maps initial conditions to integers (enumerating the attractors they converged to). B references a dynamical system which depends on parameters p. (2) pi , a discretized parameter curve existing in an arbitrary parameter space (i.e., not just a single parameter). (3) S, instructions on how to sample the s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Global continuation of an Echo State Net￾work (ESN) of 500 nodes while preserving and tracking its basin structure. a: basin fractions, b, c: minimum and maximum input-driven excitability thresh￾old (ET) for fixed point attractors (sharing colours with a), d: mean squared error (MSE, measure of the ESN per￾formance). A shaded black region denotes the spectral radius that minimizes MSE. This continuation wa… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multiparameter global continuation and parameter region identification/segmentation. Hilbert curve based global continuation of a simple predator prey model with two parameters C, E. See §5.4 for a code snippet exactly producing this continuation. a: basins of attraction for C, E = (0.4, 0.4), with the attractors Aj over-plotted. b: Global continuation of the model over a two-dimensional parameter space, c… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multiple continuations with prescribed parameter changes and parameter uncertainty. Multi-parameter continuations of a cloud model repre￾senting the study of climate change scenario on cloud state transitions between high and low cloud cover (from Ref. [33]). In the plot, 100 continuations are visualized with transparent colour, and each of the continuation seg￾ments is given a unique colour and marker acc… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger mul- tiple climate tipping points,

    D. I. Armstrong McKay, A. Staal, J. F. Abrams, R. Winkelmann, B. Sakschewski, S. Loriani, I. Fet- zer, S. E. Cornell, J. Rockstr¨ om, and T. M. Lenton, “Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger mul- tiple climate tipping points,”Science, vol. 377, p. eabn7950, Sept. 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Synthetic multistability in mam- malian cells,

    R. Zhu, J. M. del Rio-Salgado, J. Garcia-Ojalvo, and M. B. Elowitz, “Synthetic multistability in mam- malian cells,”Science, vol. 375, 1 2022

    2022

  3. [3]

    Tipping points in open systems: bifurcation, noise- induced and rate-dependent examples in the climate system,

    P. Ashwin, S. Wieczorek, R. Vitolo, and P. Cox, “Tipping points in open systems: bifurcation, noise- induced and rate-dependent examples in the climate system,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences, vol. 370, no. 1962, pp. 1166–1184, 2012

    1962

  4. [4]

    Tipping ele- ments in the Earth’s climate system,

    T. Lenton, H. Held, E. Kriegler, J. W. Hall, W. Lucht, S. Rahmstorf, and H. J. Schellnhuber, “Tipping ele- ments in the Earth’s climate system,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 06, pp. 1786–1793, 2008

    2008

  5. [5]

    Thermohaline convection with two stable regimes of flow,

    H. M. Stommel, “Thermohaline convection with two stable regimes of flow,”Tellus Series A-dynamic Me- teorology and Oceanography, vol. 13, pp. 224–230, 1961

    1961

  6. [6]

    A global climatic model based on the energy balance of the earth-atmosphere system,

    W. D. Sellers, “A global climatic model based on the energy balance of the earth-atmosphere system,” Journal of Applied Meteorology, vol. 8, pp. 392–400, 6 1969

    1969

  7. [7]

    The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the earth,

    M. I. Budyko, “The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the earth,”Tellus, vol. 21, pp. 611– 619, 1969

    1969

  8. [8]

    Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosys- tems with a multiplicity of stable states,

    R. M. May, “Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosys- tems with a multiplicity of stable states,”Nature, vol. 269, pp. 471–477, 10 1977

    1977

  9. [9]

    Approaching a state shift in earth’s bio- sphere,

    A. D. Barnosky, E. A. Hadly, J. Bascompte, E. L. Berlow, J. H. Brown, M. Fortelius, W. M. Getz, J. Harte, A. Hastings, P. A. Marquet, N. D. Martinez, A. Mooers, P. Roopnarine, G. Vermeij, J. W. Williams, R. Gillespie, J. Kitzes, C. Marshall, N. Matzke, D. P. Mindell, E. Revilla, and A. B. Smith, “Approaching a state shift in earth’s bio- sphere,”Nature, v...

    2012

  10. [10]

    Early warning signals for criti- cal transitions in power systems,

    H. Ren and D. Watts, “Early warning signals for criti- cal transitions in power systems,”Electric Power Sys- tems Research, vol. 124, pp. 173–180, 2015

    2015

  11. [11]

    The critical point of the transition to turbulence in pipe flow,

    V. Mukund and B. Hof, “The critical point of the transition to turbulence in pipe flow,”Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 839, p. 76–94, Jan. 2018

    2018

  12. [12]

    Atmo- spheric bistability and abrupt transitions to super- rotation: Wave–jet resonance and hadley cell feed- backs,

    C. Herbert, R. Caballero, and F. Bouchet, “Atmo- spheric bistability and abrupt transitions to super- rotation: Wave–jet resonance and hadley cell feed- backs,”Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 77, pp. 31–49, 1 2020

    2020

  13. [13]

    Experimental observa- tion of critical phenomena in a laser light system,

    A. Rosen, R. Weill, B. Levit, V. Smulakovsky, A. Bekker, and B. Fischer, “Experimental observa- tion of critical phenomena in a laser light system,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 1, 2010

    2010

  14. [14]

    B¨ ohm and K

    F. B¨ ohm and K. L¨ udge,Exploiting Multistability to Stabilize Chimera States in All-to-All Coupled Laser Networks, p. 355–374. Springer International Pub- lishing, 2016

    2016

  15. [15]

    A. N. Pisarchik and A. E. Hramov,Multistability in Physical and Living Systems. Springer International Publishing, 2022

    2022

  16. [16]

    Rate-induced tipping in natural and human systems,

    P. D. L. Ritchie, H. Alkhayuon, P. M. Cox, and S. Wieczorek, “Rate-induced tipping in natural and human systems,”Earth System Dynamics, vol. 14, pp. 669–683, June 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    Minimal fatal shocks in multistable complex networks,

    L. Halekotte and U. Feudel, “Minimal fatal shocks in multistable complex networks,”Scientific Reports, vol. 10, p. 11783, July 2020

    2020

  18. [18]

    Dankowicz and F

    H. Dankowicz and F. Schilder,Recipes for Continua- tion. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 10 2013

    2013

  19. [19]

    E. J. Doedel, A. R. Champneys, F. Dercole, T. F. Fairgrieve, Y. A. Kuznetsov, B. Oldeman, R. Paffen- roth, B. Sandstede, X. Wang, and C. Zhang,AUTO- 07P: Continuation and bifurcation software for or- dinary differential equations. Concordia University, 2007. 20

    2007

  20. [20]

    Krauskopf, H

    B. Krauskopf, H. M. Osinga, and J. Gal´ an-Vioque, eds.,Numerical Continuation Methods for Dynamical Systems: Path Following and Boundary Value Prob- lems. Understanding Complex Systems, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007

    2007

  21. [21]

    How basin stability complements the linear-stability paradigm,

    P. J. Menck, J. Heitzig, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, “How basin stability complements the linear-stability paradigm,”Nature Physics, vol. 9, pp. 89–92, Feb. 2013

    2013

  22. [22]

    Computing resilience measures in dynamical systems,

    A. Morr, C. Kuehn, and G. Datseris, “Computing resilience measures in dynamical systems,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 36, Feb. 2026

    2026

  23. [23]

    Experimental continua- tion of periodic orbits through a fold,

    J. Sieber, A. Gonzalez-Buelga, S. A. Neild, D. J. Wagg, and B. Krauskopf, “Experimental continua- tion of periodic orbits through a fold,”Physical Re- view Letters, vol. 100, p. 244101, 6 2008

    2008

  24. [24]

    Method for stabilizing unstable periodic orbits in dynamic-mode atomic force microscopy,

    H. Wallner, L. B¨ ottcher, N. Kruse, W. Just, I. Barke, S. Speller, and J. Starke, “Method for stabilizing unstable periodic orbits in dynamic-mode atomic force microscopy,”Physical Review Applied, vol. 25, p. 044088, 4 2026

    2026

  25. [25]

    Datseris and U

    G. Datseris and U. Parlitz,Nonlinear Dynamics: A Concise Introduction Interlaced with Code. Under- graduate Lecture Notes in Physics, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022

    2022

  26. [26]

    Ott,Chaos in Dynamical Systems

    E. Ott,Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Cambridge University Press, Aug. 2002

    2002

  27. [27]

    Effortless esti- mation of basins of attraction,

    G. Datseris and A. Wagemakers, “Effortless esti- mation of basins of attraction,”Chaos: An Inter- disciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 32, p. 023104, Feb. 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    The unreasonable effec- tiveness of recurrent neural networks,

    A. Karpathy, “The unreasonable effec- tiveness of recurrent neural networks,” https://karpathy.github.io/2015/05/21/rnn- effectiveness/, 2015

    2015

  29. [29]

    Interpreting recur- rent neural networks behaviour via excitable network attractors,

    A. Ceni, P. Ashwin, and L. Livi, “Interpreting recur- rent neural networks behaviour via excitable network attractors,”Cognitive Computation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 330–356, 2020

    2020

  30. [30]

    Transitions in echo index and dependence on input repetitions,

    P. Ashwin and A. Ceni, “Transitions in echo index and dependence on input repetitions,”Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 467, p. 134277, 2024

    2024

  31. [31]

    The “echo state

    H. Jaeger, “The “echo state” approach to analysing and training recurrent neural networks-with an er- ratum note,”Bonn, Germany: German national re- search center for information technology gmd techni- cal report, vol. 148, no. 34, p. 13, 2001

    2001

  32. [32]

    Fadera,Attractors and computational properties of input-driven recurrent neural networks

    M. Fadera,Attractors and computational properties of input-driven recurrent neural networks. PhD the- sis, University of Exeter, 2025

    2025

  33. [33]

    Sensitivity of stratocumulus–cumulus transitions in a cloudy energy balance model,

    G. Datseris, “Sensitivity of stratocumulus–cumulus transitions in a cloudy energy balance model,”Jour- nal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, vol. 18, Apr. 2026

    2026

  34. [34]

    Ongoing cortical activity at rest: Criticality, multistability, and ghost attractors,

    G. Deco and V. K. Jirsa, “Ongoing cortical activity at rest: Criticality, multistability, and ghost attractors,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, p. 3366–3375, Mar. 2012

    2012

  35. [35]

    Trajectory-based stabilization of periodic orbits,

    N. Kruse, W. Just, and J. Starke, “Trajectory-based stabilization of periodic orbits,”SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., vol. 24, pp. 2162–2179, Sept. 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Station-keeping of l2 halo or- bits under sampled-data model predictive control,

    M. Elobaid, M. Mattioni, S. Monaco, and D. Normand-Cyrot, “Station-keeping of l2 halo or- bits under sampled-data model predictive control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 45, no. 7, p. 1337–1346, 2022

    2022

  37. [37]

    HarmonicBalance.jl: A Julia suite for nonlin- ear dynamics using harmonic balance,

    J. Koˇ sata, J. del Pino, T. L. Heugel, and O. Zilber- berg, “HarmonicBalance.jl: A Julia suite for nonlin- ear dynamics using harmonic balance,”SciPost Phys. Codebases, p. 6, 2022

    2022

  38. [38]

    Multistability and intermingledness in com- plex high-dimensional data,

    G. Datseris, J. Lohmann, O. Hamilton, and J. Haqq- Misra, “Multistability and intermingledness in com- plex high-dimensional data,” 2026

    2026

  39. [39]

    Framework for global stability analysis of dynami- cal systems,

    G. Datseris, K. Luiz Rossi, and A. Wagemakers, “Framework for global stability analysis of dynami- cal systems,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 33, p. 073151, July 2023

    2023

  40. [40]

    R. M. May,Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosys- tems. Princeton University Press, 1973

    1973

  41. [41]

    The complexity and stability of ecosys- tems,

    S. L. Pimm, “The complexity and stability of ecosys- tems,”Nature, vol. 307, pp. 321–326, Jan. 1984

    1984

  42. [42]

    Engineering resilience versus ecologi- cal resilience,

    C. S. Holling, “Engineering resilience versus ecologi- cal resilience,” 1996

    1996

  43. [43]

    Early-warning signals for critical transitions,

    M. Scheffer, J. Bascompte, W. A. Brock, V. Brovkin, S. R. Carpenter, V. Dakos, H. Held, E. H. van Nes, M. Rietkerk, and G. Sugihara, “Early-warning signals for critical transitions,”Nature, vol. 461, no. 7260, pp. 53–59, 2009

    2009

  44. [44]

    Re- silience, reactivity and variability: A mathematical comparison of ecological stability measures,

    J.-F. Arnoldi, M. Loreau, and B. Haegeman, “Re- silience, reactivity and variability: A mathematical comparison of ecological stability measures,”Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 389, pp. 47–59, Jan. 2016

    2016

  45. [45]

    Empirical evi- dence for recent global shifts in vegetation resilience,

    T. Smith, D. Traxl, and N. Boers, “Empirical evi- dence for recent global shifts in vegetation resilience,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 12, pp. 477–484, May 2022

    2022

  46. [46]

    Alternatives to Re- silience for Measuring the Responses of Ecological Systems to Perturbations,

    M. G. Neubert and H. Caswell, “Alternatives to Re- silience for Measuring the Responses of Ecological Systems to Perturbations,”Ecology, vol. 78, p. 653, Apr. 1997. Publisher: Wiley

    1997

  47. [47]

    Sensitivity Analysis of Re- active Ecological Dynamics,

    A. Verdy and H. Caswell, “Sensitivity Analysis of Re- active Ecological Dynamics,”Bulletin of Mathemati- cal Biology, vol. 70, pp. 1634–1659, Aug. 2008. Pub- lisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC

    2008

  48. [48]

    What makes ecological systems re- active?,

    R. E. Snyder, “What makes ecological systems re- active?,”Theoretical Population Biology, vol. 77, pp. 243–249, June 2010. Publisher: Elsevier BV. 21

    2010

  49. [49]

    Analysis of Asymptotic and Transient Behaviors of Stochastic Ratio-Dependent Predator–Prey Model,

    W. Liu and J. Feng, “Analysis of Asymptotic and Transient Behaviors of Stochastic Ratio-Dependent Predator–Prey Model,”Mathematics, vol. 9, p. 2776, Nov. 2021. Publisher: MDPI AG

    2021

  50. [50]

    Towards a Comparative Framework of De- mographic Resilience,

    P. Capdevila, I. Stott, M. Beger, and R. Salguero- G´ omez, “Towards a Comparative Framework of De- mographic Resilience,”Trends in Ecology & Evolu- tion, vol. 35, pp. 776–786, Sept. 2020. Publisher: El- sevier BV

    2020

  51. [51]

    Ecolog- ical Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale,

    G. Peterson, C. R. Allen, and C. S. Holling, “Ecolog- ical Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale,”Ecosystems, vol. 1, pp. 6–18, Jan. 1998. Publisher: Springer Sci- ence and Business Media LLC

    1998

  52. [52]

    Vari- ability Of Lakes On The Landscape: Roles Of Phos- phorus, Food Webs, And Dissolved Organic Carbon,

    B. E. Beisner, C. L. Dent, and S. R. Carpenter, “Vari- ability Of Lakes On The Landscape: Roles Of Phos- phorus, Food Webs, And Dissolved Organic Carbon,” Ecology, vol. 84, pp. 1563–1575, June 2003. Publisher: Wiley

    2003

  53. [53]

    An optimization approach for analysing nonlinear stability with transition to turbulence in fluids as an exemplar,

    R. R. Kerswell, C. C. T. Pringle, and A. P. Willis, “An optimization approach for analysing nonlinear stability with transition to turbulence in fluids as an exemplar,”Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 77, p. 085901, Aug. 2014. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2014

  54. [54]

    Sta- bility threshold approach for complex dynamical sys- tems,

    V. V. Klinshov, V. I. Nekorkin, and J. Kurths, “Sta- bility threshold approach for complex dynamical sys- tems,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 18, p. 013004, Dec. 2015

    2015

  55. [55]

    Designing Hetero- clinic and Excitable Networks in Phase Space Using Two Populations of Coupled Cells,

    P. Ashwin and C. Postlethwaite, “Designing Hetero- clinic and Excitable Networks in Phase Space Using Two Populations of Coupled Cells,”Journal of Non- linear Science, vol. 26, pp. 345–364, Apr. 2016

    2016

  56. [56]

    Switching thresholds for multistable systems under strong external pertur- bation,

    V. Klinshov and V. Nekorkin, “Switching thresholds for multistable systems under strong external pertur- bation,”Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 83, p. 105067, Apr. 2020

    2020

  57. [57]

    Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems,

    C. S. Holling, “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems,”Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, vol. 4, pp. 1–23, Nov. 1973

    1973

  58. [58]

    Definitions of resilience,

    H.-R. Gruemm, “Definitions of resilience,” IIASA Re- search Report, RR-76-005, IIASA, Laxenburg, Aus- tria, Mar. 1976

    1976

  59. [59]

    How to find simple nonlocal sta- bility and resilience measures,

    N. L. P. Lundstr¨ om, “How to find simple nonlocal sta- bility and resilience measures,”Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 93, pp. 887–908, July 2018

    2018

  60. [60]

    Ecosystem Persistence and Het- erotrophic Regulation,

    R. V. O’Neill, “Ecosystem Persistence and Het- erotrophic Regulation,”Ecology, vol. 57, pp. 1244– 1253, Nov. 1976. Publisher: Wiley

    1976

  61. [61]

    Effects of Nutrient Recycling and Food-Chain Length on Resilience,

    D. L. DeAngelis, S. M. Bartell, and A. L. Brenkert, “Effects of Nutrient Recycling and Food-Chain Length on Resilience,”The American Naturalist, vol. 134, no. 5, pp. 778–805, 1989. Publisher: [The University of Chicago Press, The American Society of Naturalists]

    1989

  62. [62]

    Predictive Indices of Ecosystem Resilience in Models of North Temperate Lakes: Ecological Archives E075-001,

    K. L. Cottingham and S. R. Carpenter, “Predictive Indices of Ecosystem Resilience in Models of North Temperate Lakes: Ecological Archives E075-001,” Ecology, vol. 75, pp. 2127–2138, Oct. 1994. Publisher: Wiley

    1994

  63. [63]

    Bounding the first exit from the basin: Independence times and finite-time basin stability,

    P. Schultz, F. Hellmann, K. N. Webster, and J. Kurths, “Bounding the first exit from the basin: Independence times and finite-time basin stability,” Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 28, p. 043102, Apr. 2018

    2018

  64. [64]

    Estimating fractal dimensions: A comparative review and open source implementations,

    G. Datseris, I. Kottlarz, A. P. Braun, and U. Par- litz, “Estimating fractal dimensions: A comparative review and open source implementations,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 33, Oct. 2023

    2023

  65. [65]

    Complexitymea- sures.jl: Scalable software to unify and accelerate entropy and complexity timeseries analysis,

    G. Datseris and K. A. Haaga, “Complexitymea- sures.jl: Scalable software to unify and accelerate entropy and complexity timeseries analysis,”PLOS One, vol. 20, p. e0324431, June 2025

    2025

  66. [66]

    Recurrencemicrostate- sanalysis.jl: A julia library for analyzing dynamical systems with recurrence microstates,

    G. Vinicius Ferreira, F. E. Lopes da Cruz, G. Marghoti, T. de Lima Prado, S. Roberto Lopes, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, “Recurrencemicrostate- sanalysis.jl: A julia library for analyzing dynamical systems with recurrence microstates,”Chaos: An In- terdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 35, p. 113123, 11 2025

    2025

  67. [67]

    Datseris/globalcontinuationpaper: arxiv first edition,

    G. Datseris, “Datseris/globalcontinuationpaper: arxiv first edition,” June 2026

    2026

  68. [68]

    Irregularity: a fundamental property of the atmosphere,

    E. N. Lorenz, “Irregularity: a fundamental property of the atmosphere,”Tellus A, vol. 36 A, pp. 98–110, 1984

    1984

  69. [69]

    Basin stability for updating system uncertainties,

    D. Dudkowski and T. Kapitaniak, “Basin stability for updating system uncertainties,”Phys. Rev. E., vol. 110, p. 014205, July 2024

    2024

  70. [70]

    Monte carlo basin bifurcation analysis,

    M. Gelbrecht, J. Kurths, and F. Hellmann, “Monte carlo basin bifurcation analysis,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 22, p. 033032, Mar. 2020

    2020

  71. [71]

    A taxonomy of multiple stable states in com- plex ecological communities,

    G. Aguad´ e-Gorgori´ o, J. F. Arnoldi, M. Barbier, and S. K´ efi, “A taxonomy of multiple stable states in com- plex ecological communities,”Ecology Letters, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1–14, 2024

    2024

  72. [72]

    A resilience concept based on system functioning: A dynamical systems perspective,

    S. Schoenmakers and U. Feudel, “A resilience concept based on system functioning: A dynamical systems perspective,”Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 31, p. 053126, May 2021

    2021

  73. [73]

    Network-induced multistability through lossy cou- pling and exotic solitary states,

    F. Hellmann, P. Schultz, P. Jaros, R. Levchenko, T. Kapitaniak, J. Kurths, and Y. Maistrenko, “Network-induced multistability through lossy cou- pling and exotic solitary states,”Nature Communi- cations, vol. 11, 12 2020

    2020

  74. [74]

    Bifurca- tion analysis of a vibro-impact experimental rig with two-sided constraint,

    Y. Liu, J. P. Ch´ avez, B. Guo, and R. Birler, “Bifurca- tion analysis of a vibro-impact experimental rig with two-sided constraint,”Meccanica, vol. 55, pp. 2505– 2521, 12 2020. 22

    2020

  75. [75]

    Uecker,Numerical continuation and bifurcation in nonlinear PDEs

    H. Uecker,Numerical continuation and bifurcation in nonlinear PDEs. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Indus- trial and Applied Mathematics, Jan. 2021

    2021

  76. [76]

    Potentials and limits to basin stability estimation,

    P. Schultz, P. J. Menck, J. Heitzig, and J. Kurths, “Potentials and limits to basin stability estimation,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 19, p. 023005, Feb. 2017

    2017

  77. [78]

    BifurcationKit.jl,

    R. Veltz, “BifurcationKit.jl,” July 2020

    2020

  78. [79]

    bstab: an open- source software for computing the basin stability of multi-stable dynamical systems,

    M. Stender and N. Hoffmann, “bstab: an open- source software for computing the basin stability of multi-stable dynamical systems,”Nonlinear Dynam- ics, vol. 107, p. 1451–1468, Sept. 2021

    2021

  79. [80]

    Short-term synaptic plasticity in the determin- istic tsodyks–markram model leads to unpre- dictable network dynamics,

    J. M. Cortes, M. Desroches, S. Rodrigues, R. Veltz, M. A. Mu˜ noz, and T. J. Sejnowski, “Short-term synaptic plasticity in the determin- istic tsodyks–markram model leads to unpre- dictable network dynamics,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 41, p. 16610–16615, 2013

    2013

  80. [81]

    Multistable states in a preda- tor–prey model with generalized holling type iii func- tional response and a strong allee effect,

    Y. Zeng and P. Yu, “Multistable states in a preda- tor–prey model with generalized holling type iii func- tional response and a strong allee effect,”Communi- cations in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simula- tion, vol. 131, p. 107846, 2024. 23

    2024