Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 59 references

Four conjugate-symmetric families of discrete GI lattices and four higher-order families all arise from one Cauchy-matrix construction and recover the same continuous equations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 15:14 UTC pith:G3JRQK6X

load-bearing objection Solid Cauchy-matrix construction of the missing fully discrete GI/hGI models, with solutions and continuum limits that check out; the four-family multiplicity is asserted rather than certified by independent integrability tests. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09333 v2 pith:G3JRQK6X submitted 2026-07-10 nlin.SI

Discrete Gerdjikov-Ivanov models and their higher-order counterparts from the Cauchy matrix scheme

Xiao-gang Mu , Song-lin Zhao This is my paper
classification nlin.SI MSC 37K1037K1539A1435Q55
keywords discrete Gerdjikov-Ivanovhigher-order GICauchy matrix schemeSylvester equationsoliton solutionsmultiple-pole solutionscontinuum limitnonlocal reduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation is a derivative nonlinear Schrödinger model whose fully discrete integrable versions had not been constructed. This paper shows that a Sylvester equation equipped with two distinct sets of discrete dispersion relations produces closed lattice systems for both the GI equation and its higher-order counterpart. Because the elimination of auxiliary variables admits four equally valid algebraic identities, the procedure yields four conjugate-symmetric discrete GI families and four discrete higher-order families, each carrying explicit N-soliton and multiple-pole solutions. A two-step continuum limit contracts one lattice direction at a time and returns every family to the same continuous GI or higher-order GI equation. Local complex-conjugate reductions give scalar discrete equations; in the higher-order case, pairwise recombinations further admit nonlocal reductions. A reader cares because the work both fills a missing discrete catalogue and exhibits an intrinsic non-uniqueness in the discretization of derivative-type integrable systems.

Core claim

Starting from the Sylvester equation with block structure and two distinct discrete dispersion relations (SDE-I and SDE-II), the shift dynamics of the master functions can be specialized and the auxiliary variables eliminated. The elimination step is algebraically non-unique: four valid representations of the relevant shift differences each produce a conjugate-symmetric lattice system. The result is four discrete GI models and four discrete higher-order GI models, all equipped with explicit N-soliton and multiple-pole solutions via diagonal or Jordan-block spectral matrices, and all reducing under the same two-step continuum limit to the continuous GI or higher-order GI equation.

What carries the argument

The Cauchy matrix scheme built on the Sylvester equation KM−MK=r tc together with two sets of discrete dispersion relations for the plane-wave vectors. Master functions defined from the resolvent generate both the closed lattice equations (after elimination of auxiliaries) and their soliton and multiple-pole solutions; the multiplicity of elimination identities multiplies each continuous equation into four discrete families.

Load-bearing premise

That the four different algebraic identities for the same shift differences produce four genuinely independent integrable lattice systems, rather than gauge-equivalent or trivially related copies, is asserted solely from their formal origin and shared continuum limit.

What would settle it

Construct explicit Lax pairs or multi-dimensional consistency conditions for two of the four discrete GI families and show they are related by a discrete gauge or Bäcklund transformation; equivalence would collapse the claim that the families are distinct.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Fully discrete integrable analogues of both the GI and higher-order GI equations now exist and can be used for numerical schemes or combinatorial studies.
  • All four discrete GI models share one continuum limit, and all four higher-order models share another, so each continuous equation possesses multiple inequivalent-looking lattice realizations.
  • Local complex-conjugate reductions immediately supply scalar discrete GI and higher-order GI equations with closed-form soliton solutions.
  • Pairwise recombinations of the higher-order lattice equations admit nonlocal reductions that produce nonlocal discrete higher-order GI equations and their solutions.
  • The same higher-order models can equivalently be obtained from a KP-type Cauchy matrix scheme, confirming the construction is not scheme-dependent.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The non-uniqueness of auxiliary elimination is likely a general feature of derivative NLS discretizations and should appear for the Kaup–Newell and Chen–Lee–Liu equations as well.
  • Independent integrability certificates (Lax pairs, conserved densities, or multi-dimensional consistency) are the natural next test of whether the four families are inequivalent or merely related by discrete gauges.
  • The appearance of nonlocal reductions only after recombination of higher-order equations suggests that higher members of the hierarchy systematically enlarge the admissible reduction group.
  • These lattice models may supply new discrete maps for optical or plasma systems currently described by continuous derivative NLS equations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs fully discrete integrable analogues of the Gerdjikov–Ivanov (GI) equation and its higher-order counterpart (hGI) via the Cauchy matrix scheme. Starting from the Sylvester equation with two distinct discrete dispersion relations (SDE-I with complex lattice parameters and SDE-II with real parameters plus a sign matrix), the authors derive shift dynamics of the master functions, eliminate auxiliaries, and obtain four conjugate-symmetric families of discrete GI (dGI) models (eqs. (3.39), (3.41)–(3.43)) and four families of discrete higher-order GI (dhGI) models (eqs. (4.27), (4.29)–(4.31)). Explicit N-soliton and multiple-pole solutions are given for each model (Theorems 3.1–3.4, 4.1–4.6). A two-step continuum limit recovers the continuous GI and hGI systems, respectively. Local complex-conjugate reductions produce scalar equations; for the higher-order models, pairwise recombinations further admit nonlocal reductions.

Significance. Fully discrete integrable analogues of the derivative NLS family (especially GI and hGI) have been largely missing; the paper fills that gap systematically. The Cauchy-matrix construction simultaneously supplies the lattice equations and their soliton/multiple-pole solutions, and the two-step continuum limits with explicit plane-wave asymptotics provide a clear consistency check that all four models in each family recover the same continuous equation. The appearance of nonlocal reductions only at the higher-order level is a structural observation of independent interest. The algebraic derivations (Propositions 3.1–3.2, 4.1; continuum expansions in §§3.4, 4.4) are written out in detail and appear self-contained. These features make the work a useful addition to the discrete-integrable-systems literature.

major comments (2)
  1. Remark 3.2 (and the parallel discussion around (4.26) for dhGI) asserts that the four algebraic representations of the shift differences (u1−beu1) and (eu1−bu1) produce four genuinely distinct integrable lattice systems. Distinctness is argued solely from the different identities and the shared continuum limit. No independent integrability certificate (Lax pair, conserved densities, multi-dimensional consistency, or Bäcklund transformation) is supplied that would distinguish the four models from gauge-equivalent or trivially related copies. This is the softest load-bearing claim; a short discussion or a single distinguishing property for at least one pair would strengthen the central assertion of multiplicity.
  2. Section 5 lists the derivation of Lax pairs for the discrete models as future work. While the Cauchy-matrix origin and continuum limits give strong circumstantial evidence of integrability, the absence of any lattice-level integrability check (even for one representative model) leaves open the possibility that some of the four systems are only “solution-generating” rather than fully integrable. A brief remark on why Lax pairs are deferred, or a sketch for the simplest model, would make the integrability claim more robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. Notation for the four dGI models is dense; a short table listing the four pairs of identities ((3.38)/(3.40) combinations) against the resulting equation numbers would improve readability.
  2. In Remark 3.1 the sign convention for the square-root terms P and Q depends on Im(p), Im(q). A one-sentence clarification that the continuum-limit calculations assume the positive-imaginary branch would avoid ambiguity.
  3. Appendix A (KP-type scheme) is useful but only sketched; a sentence indicating whether the same four elimination routes appear in the KP setting would complete the parallel.
  4. A few typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “beu” versus “be u”, occasional missing spaces around operators). A light copy-edit pass would clean them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: discrete models, solutions and continuum limits are derived algebraically from Sylvester + chosen SDEs and recover independently known continuous GI/hGI equations.

full rationale

The derivation chain begins from the Sylvester equation (2.1) equipped with two explicit sets of discrete dispersion relations (SDE-I (3.2) and SDE-II (4.1)). Shift dynamics of the master functions S(i,j) are obtained by direct matrix algebra (Props. 3.1–3.2, 4.1), after which auxiliary variables are eliminated via algebraic identities (e.g., (3.38) vs (3.40) and the four pairings of (4.26)) to produce closed lattice systems. Solutions are constructed from the same Cauchy data (diagonal or Jordan spectral matrices) that satisfy the SDEs by construction; this is the standard, non-circular output of the Cauchy-matrix method rather than a tautology. Continuum limits (two-step contractions of lattice parameters) recover the independently known continuous GI (1.1)/(3.68) and hGI (1.3)/(4.51) equations, which serve as external consistency checks. Self-citations (e.g., [45,46] for recurrence/similarity properties of master functions, earlier Zhao papers for the general scheme) supply reusable technical lemmas of the method; they do not underwrite the target GI lattices themselves, nor is any uniqueness theorem imported to forbid alternatives. No parameters are fitted to data and then re-presented as predictions, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. The open question whether the four elimination routes yield inequivalent integrable systems is a matter of completeness of integrability certificates, not circularity of the derivation. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 2 invented entities

The construction rests on the standard Sylvester equation, the formal invertibility of I+M, the non-sharing of eigenvalues between K1 and K2, and two ad-hoc choices of discrete dispersion relations (SDE-I with complex conjugate lattice parameters, SDE-II with real parameters and a sign matrix). No free parameters are fitted to data; lattice parameters p,q and spectral data are free but not fitted. Invented entities are the four families of lattice equations themselves, which are derived rather than postulated.

axioms (4)
  • standard math Sylvester equation KM−MK=r tc admits unique solutions M1,M2 when K1 and K2 share no eigenvalues (Remark 2.1, eqs. (2.1)–(2.3)).
    Classical linear-algebra fact used throughout to guarantee unique master functions.
  • domain assumption I+M is formally invertible so that the master functions S(i,j)=tc Kj(I+M)−1 Ki r are well-defined (eq. (2.5)).
    Standard working hypothesis of the Cauchy-matrix approach; invertibility is assumed rather than proved for the discrete flows.
  • ad hoc to paper Two distinct discrete dispersion relations (SDE-I with complex p,q and conjugates; SDE-II with real p,q and sign matrix a) generate the shift dynamics of the master functions (eqs. (3.2), (4.1)).
    These dispersion sets are chosen by the authors to produce GI-type rather than NLS-type lattices; they are not derived from a deeper principle inside the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper The four algebraic identities for the shift differences (u1−beu1, eu1−bu1) are equally valid and each yields an independent integrable system (Remark 3.2).
    The paper treats the four representations as generating distinct models solely on formal grounds; no further integrability test is supplied.
invented entities (2)
  • Four conjugate-symmetric dGI lattice systems (eqs. (3.39), (3.41)–(3.43)) independent evidence
    purpose: Provide fully discrete integrable analogues of the continuous GI equation.
    Derived objects; independent evidence is the continuum limit recovering the known GI equation and the explicit soliton formulae.
  • Four dhGI lattice systems (eqs. (4.27), (4.29)–(4.31)) and their nonlocal recombinations independent evidence
    purpose: Provide fully discrete integrable analogues of the higher-order GI equation, including nonlocal versions.
    Derived objects; continuum limit recovers the known hGI equation; nonlocal reductions are new.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 39101 in / 3280 out tokens · 28894 ms · 2026-07-14T15:14:22.258433+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The Gerdjikov-Ivanov (GI) equation is an important model in the derivative nonlinear Schrodinger system, yet its fully discrete integrable analogues remain unexplored. In this paper, we systematically construct discrete versions of both the GI equation and its higher-order counterpart (hGI equation) within the Cauchy matrix framework. Starting from the Sylvester equation equipped with two distinct sets of discrete dispersion relations, we derive the shift dynamics of the master functions and eliminate auxiliary variables to obtain closed lattice systems. Since the elimination step admits several equally valid algebraic identities, this procedure yields four conjugate-symmetric families of discrete GI (dGI) models and four families of discrete higher-order GI (dhGI) models. For each discrete model, we provide explicit N-soliton and multiple-pole solutions via the Cauchy matrix method with diagonal and Jordan-block spectral matrices, respectively. We verify through a two-step continuum limit, contracting one lattice direction at a time, that all four dGI models reduce to the same continuous GI equation and all four dhGI models reduce to the same continuous hGI equation. Finally, we investigate reductions: local complex conjugate reductions yield scalar dGI and dhGI equations with explicit solutions. Moreover, in the higher-order case, pairwise recombinations of the dhGI lattice equations admit nonlocal reductions that produce nonlocal dhGI equations and their solutions.

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz, B. Prinari, A. D. Trubatch, Integrable nonlinear Schr¨ odinger systems and their soliton dynamics, Dynamics of PDE, 1(3):239–299, 2004. 30

    2004

  2. [2]

    Kodama, Optical solitons in a monomode fiber, J

    Y. Kodama, Optical solitons in a monomode fiber, J. Statist. Phys., 39:597–614, 1985

    1985

  3. [3]

    K. Mio, T. Ogino, K. Minami, S. Takeda, Modified nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation for Alfv´ en waves propagating along the magnetic field in cold plasmas, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 41(1):265–271, 1976

    1976

  4. [4]

    D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, An exact solution for a derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 19:798–801, 1978

    1978

  5. [5]

    H. H. Chen, Y. C. Lee, C. S. Liu, Integrability of nonlinear Hamiltonian systems by inverse scattering method, Phys. Scripta, 20:490–492, 1979

    1979

  6. [6]

    V. S. Gerdjikov, M. I. Ivanov, The quadratic bundle of general form and the nonlinear evolution equations: Hierarchies of Hamiltonian structures, Bulg. J. Phys., 10:130, 1983

    1983

  7. [7]

    V. S. Gerdjikov, P. P. Kulish, Multicomponent nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in the case of nonzero boundary conditions, J. Math. Sci., 30:2261–2269, 1985

    1985

  8. [8]

    E. G. Fan, Darboux transformation and soliton-like solutions for the Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 33:6925–6933, 2000

    2000

  9. [9]

    B. L. Guo, L. M. Ling, Riemann–Hilbert approach andN-soliton formula for coupled derivative Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 53:073506, 2012

    2012

  10. [10]

    J. H. Luo, E. G. Fan, ¯∂-dressing method for the coupled Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 110:106589, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    Y. Hou, E. G. Fan, P. Zhao, Algebro-geometric solutions for the Gerdjikov-Ivanov hierarchy, J. Math. Phys., 54:073505, 2013

    2013

  12. [12]

    E. G. Fan, Integrable systems of derivative nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type and their multi-Hamiltonian structure, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 34:513–519, 2001

    2001

  13. [13]

    J. Y. Zhu, Y. Chen, High-order soliton matrix for the third-order flow equation of the Gerdjikov- Ivanov hierarchy through the Riemann-Hilbert method, Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser., 40:358– 378, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Z. F. Zou, R. Guo, The Riemann-Hilbert approach for the higher-order Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation, soliton interactions and position shift, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 124:107316, 2023

    2023

  15. [15]

    Z. Y. Shen, B. B. Hu, L. Zhang, F. Fang, The unified transformation approach to higher-order Gerdjikov-Ivanov model and Riemann-Hilbert problem, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 541:128681, 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    M. J. Ablowitz, J. F. Ladik, Nonlinear difference scheme and inverse scattering, Stud. Appl. Math., 55:213–229, 1976

    1976

  17. [17]

    Ablowitz, F.J

    M.J. Ablowitz, F.J. Ladik, On the solution of a class of nonlinear partial difference equations, Stud. Appl. Math., 57:1–12, 1977

    1977

  18. [18]

    Hirota, Nonlinear partial difference equations I-III, J

    R. Hirota, Nonlinear partial difference equations I-III, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 43:1424–1433, 2074– 2089, 1977

    2074

  19. [19]

    Hietarinta, N

    J. Hietarinta, N. Joshi, F. W. Nijhoff, Discrete Systems and Integrability, Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  20. [20]

    E. Date, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, Method for generating discrete soliton equations I-III, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 51:4116–4131, 1982; 52:388–393, 1983

    1982

  21. [21]

    F. W. Nijhoff, G. R. W. Quispel, H. W. Capel, Direct linearization of nonlinear difference-difference equations, Phys. Lett. 97A:125–128, 1983

    1983

  22. [22]

    F. W. Nijhoff, H. W. Capel, G. L. Wiersma, G. R. W. Quispel, B¨ acklund transformations and three-dimensional lattice equations, Phys. Lett. A, 105:267–272, 1984

    1984

  23. [23]

    F. W. Nijhoff, H. W. Capel, The discrete Korteweg–de Vries equation, Acta Appl. Math., 39(1):133– 158, 1995

    1995

  24. [24]

    A. I. Bobenko, Yu. B. Suris, Integrable systems on quad-graphs, Int. Math. Res. Notices, 11:573–611, 2002. 31

    2002

  25. [25]

    V. E. Adler, A. I. Bobenko, Yu. B. Suris, Classification of integrable equations on quad-graphs, the consistency approach, Commun. Math. Phys., 233:513-543, 2003

    2003

  26. [26]

    Atkinson, J

    J. Atkinson, J. Hietarinta, F. Nijhoff, Soliton solutions for Q3, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 41: 142001, 2008

    2008

  27. [27]

    Hietarinta, D

    J. Hietarinta, D. J. Zhang, Soliton solutions for ABS lattice equations: II. Casoratians and bilin- earization, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 42:404006, 2009

    2009

  28. [28]

    Butler, N

    S. Butler, N. Joshi, An inverse scattering transform for the lattice potential KdV equation, Inver. Prob. 26:115012, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    Hietarinta, Boussinesq-like multi-component lattice equations and multi-dimensional consistency, J

    J. Hietarinta, Boussinesq-like multi-component lattice equations and multi-dimensional consistency, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 44:165204, 2011

    2011

  30. [30]

    D. J. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, F. W. Nijhoff, Direct Linearization of extended lattice BSQ systems, Stud. Appl. Math. 129: 220–248, 2012

    2012

  31. [31]

    F. W. Nijhoff, Y. Y. Sun, D. J. Zhang, Elliptic solutions of Boussinesq type lattice equations and the elliptic Nth root of unity, Commun. Math. Phys., 399: 599–650, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    B. G. Konopelchenko, Elementary B¨ acklund transformations, nonlinear superposition principle and solutions of the integrable equations, Phys. Lett. A, 87:445–448, 1982

    1982

  33. [33]

    E. Date, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, Method for generating discrete soliton equations. IV, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 52:761–765, 1983

    1983

  34. [34]

    Willox, M

    R. Willox, M. Hattori, Discretisations of constrained KP hierarchies. J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 22:613–661, 2015

    2015

  35. [35]

    Fisenko, S

    X. Fisenko, S. Konstantinou-Rizos, P. Xenitidis, A discrete Darboux–Lax scheme for integrable difference equations, Chaos, Soliton & Fract., 158:112059, 2022

    2022

  36. [36]

    G. R. W. Quispel, F. W. Nijhoff, H. W. Capel, J. van der Linden, Linear integral equations and nonlinear difference-difference equations, Physica A, 125:344–380, 1984

    1984

  37. [37]

    S. L. Zhao, W. Feng, Y. Y. Jin, Discrete analogues for two nonlinear Schr¨ odinger type equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simulat., 72:329–341, 2019

    2019

  38. [38]

    Zhang, S

    S. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, Y. Shi, Discrete second-order Ablowitz–Kaup–Newell–Segur equation and its modified form, Theor. Math. Phys., 210(3):304–326, 2022

    2022

  39. [39]

    X. X. Xu, C. W. Cao, D. J. Zhang, Algebro-geometric solutions to the lattice potential modified Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 55:375201, 2022

    2022

  40. [40]

    X. X. Xu, D. C. Yi, X. Li, D. J. Zhang, Algebro-geometric integration to the discrete Chen–Lee–Liu system, Physica D, 481:134778, 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    S. L. Zhao, X. G. Mu, D. J. Zhang, Discretization of the Mikhailov model, Physica D, 495:135301, 2026

    2026

  42. [42]

    F. W. Nijhoff, J. Atkinson, J. Hietarinta, Soliton solutions for ABS lattice equations: I. Cauchy matrix approach, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 42:404005, 2009

    2009

  43. [43]

    D. J. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, Solutions to ABS lattice equations via generalized Cauchy matrix approach, Stud. Appl. Math., 131:72–103, 2013

    2013

  44. [44]

    D. D. Xu, D. J. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, The Sylvester equation and integrable equations: I. The Korteweg-de Vries system and sine-Gordon equation, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 21(3):382–406, 2014

    2014

  45. [45]

    S. L. Zhao, A discrete negative AKNS equation: generalized Cauchy matrix approach, J. Nonlinear Math. Phys., 23:544–562, 2016

    2016

  46. [46]

    S. L. Zhao, Y. Shi, Discrete and semidiscrete models for AKNS equation, Z. Naturforsch. 72(3)a:281– 290, 2017

    2017

  47. [47]

    S. L. Zhao, The Sylvester equation and integrable equations: The Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur system, Rep. Math. Phys., 82(2):241–263, 2018. 32

    2018

  48. [48]

    Mesfun, S

    M. Mesfun, S. L. Zhao, Cauchy matrix scheme for semi-discrete lattice Korteweg-de Vries-type equations, Theoret. Math. Phys., 211(1): 483–497, 2022

    2022

  49. [49]

    T. Shen, C. X. Li, X. Y. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, Z. Zhou, Cauchy matrix scheme and the semi-discrete Toda and sine-Gordon systems, Physica D, 473:134543, 2025

    2025

  50. [50]

    Z. C. Huang, S. S. Li, D. J. Zhang, The KdV hierarchy: Cauchy matrix approach, Appl. Math. Lett., 172:109726, 2026

    2026

  51. [51]

    S. L. Zhao, D. J. Zhang, Y. Shi, Generalized Cauchy matrix approach for lattice Boussinesq-type equations, Chin. Ann. Math. 33B(2):259–270, 2012

    2012

  52. [52]

    W. Feng, S. L. Zhao, Cauchy matrix type solutions for the nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Rep. Math. Phys., 84:75–83, 2019

    2019

  53. [53]

    H. J. Xu, S. L. Zhao, Cauchy matrix solutions of some local and nonlocal complex equations, Theor. Math. Phys., 213:1513–1542, 2022

    2022

  54. [54]

    Y. N. Hu, S. F. Shen, S. L. Zhao, Solutions of local and nonlocal discrete complex modified Ko- rteweg–de Vries equations and continuum limits, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 48:5557–5569, 2025

    2025

  55. [55]

    X. B. Xiang, W. Feng, S. L. Zhao, Local and nonlocal complex discrete sine-Gordon equation. Solutions and continuum limits, Theor. Math. Phys., 211:758–774, 2022

    2022

  56. [56]

    Sylvester, Sur l’equation en matricespx=xq, C

    J. Sylvester, Sur l’equation en matricespx=xq, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 99:67–71, 1884

  57. [57]

    D. J. Zhang, Notes on solutions in Wronskian form to soliton equations: KdV-type, arXiv preprint, 2006, arXiv:nlin/0603008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  58. [58]

    D. J. Zhang, S. L. Zhao, Y. Y. Sun, J. Zhou, Solutions to the modified Korteweg–de Vries equation, Rev. Math. Phys., 26(7):1430006, 2014

    2014

  59. [59]

    M. J. Ablowitz, Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110:064105, 2013. 33

    2013