Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 134 references

Ignoring the phase offset between BAO and VAO shapes in the 21-cm power spectrum would bias cosmic-dawn H(z) by about 2%.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 15:05 UTC pith:B6U7HQYL

load-bearing objection Solid first BAO/VAO decomposition of the 21-cm spectrum with a real ~2% H(z) warning; the bias number is an upper bound from Pm–Pη, not a direct fit to the post-Zeus21 templates. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09846 v1 pith:B6U7HQYL submitted 2026-07-10 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

The Rise and Fall of Acoustic Oscillations at Cosmic Dawn

Hector Afonso G. Cruz , Gabriele Montefalcone , Julian B. Mu\~noz , Ely D. Kovetz , Alessandra Venditti This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA
keywords 21-cm cosmologycosmic dawnbaryon acoustic oscillationsvelocity-induced acoustic oscillationsstandard rulerAlcock-PaczyńskiSKAfirst stars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

21-cm maps of the first billion years can act as a standard ruler, but only if the acoustic wiggles they carry are modeled correctly. Those wiggles are not pure baryon acoustic oscillations; they are a mix of BAOs from density and velocity-induced acoustic oscillations (VAOs) from the early relative motion of baryons and dark matter. The paper supplies the first analytic decomposition that splits the 21-cm power spectrum into those two pieces. The pieces are offset in phase by a percent-level amount; treating the total signal as BAO alone therefore mis-measures the expansion rate H(z) by roughly 2 percent. The same decomposition shows that BAOs and VAOs rise and fall at different times, briefly vanishing or dominating depending on the Lyman-alpha and X-ray epochs, so their relative amplitudes also encode the physics of the first stars. Forecasts for SKA then indicate when the combined ruler can be detected and when the two components can be separated.

Core claim

A percent-level phase offset exists between the BAO and VAO shapes imprinted on the 21-cm power spectrum at cosmic dawn. If that offset is ignored and the total acoustic feature is treated as a pure BAO standard ruler, inferred values of H(z) are biased by about 2 percent; the paper supplies both the decomposition that isolates the offset and a correction for it.

What carries the argument

An analytic BAO–VAO decomposition of the 21-cm power spectrum: the matter and relative-velocity spectra are each split into oscillatory “wiggle” and smooth “no-wiggle” pieces that are fed separately into a fully analytic 21-cm code, yielding additive BAO and VAO templates whose amplitudes and phases can be tracked across redshift and scale.

Load-bearing premise

The size of the velocity-induced wiggles is taken to be reliable once the molecular-cooling mass threshold for the first stars is simply raised by a fixed feedback factor.

What would settle it

Measure the locations of the second and third acoustic peaks in a high-signal-to-noise 21-cm power spectrum near z~14 and z~18; if the observed phase difference between the total feature and a pure-BAO template is inconsistent with the predicted ~2 percent H(z) shift, the claimed bias fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Joint BAO–VAO templates become a required ingredient of any percent-level 21-cm standard-ruler analysis.
  • The non-monotonic rise and fall of VAO versus BAO amplitude across cosmic dawn supplies an independent diagnostic of Lyman-alpha coupling, X-ray heating, and the first stars.
  • SKA forecasts under optimistic foreground cleaning can detect the combined acoustic feature over 10 ≲ z ≲ 24 and begin to separate the two components where their phases differ.
  • A pure-BAO treatment of the 21-cm acoustic scale will systematically mis-estimate the expansion history at the 2 percent level.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Once the phase correction is standard, residual BAO–VAO amplitude ratios could be turned into a null test for alternative dark-matter or streaming-velocity models.
  • The same decomposition should extend cleanly into reionization, where the acoustic ruler could be cross-checked against bubble-size measurements.
  • If bursty star formation raises the overall 21-cm power, the acoustic features become easier to detect even under moderate foregrounds, tightening the practical window for the H(z) measurement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an analytic decomposition of the cosmic-dawn 21-cm power spectrum into baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and velocity-induced acoustic oscillation (VAO) components using Zeus21. It shows that BAO and VAO amplitudes evolve non-monotonically with redshift (VAOs briefly vanish near the global-signal minimum; BAOs later), that the two templates are not perfectly in phase, and that treating a VAO-only wiggle as a pure Alcock–Paczyński stretch of a BAO-only template can bias H(z) by ∼2%. SKA-Low forecasts with 21cmSense indicate that optimistic foreground mitigation can detect the combined acoustic signal over a broad redshift range, while moderate mitigation yields only a marginal detection near z∼13–15. The authors conclude that joint BAO–VAO modeling is required for robust 21-cm standard-ruler cosmology.

Significance. If the decomposition and the ∼2% H(z) bias hold, the work supplies a concrete, previously missing ingredient for 21-cm acoustic inference at z≳10, where neither CMB nor galaxy BAO currently reach. Strengths include: (i) a transparent, reproducible pipeline built on public Zeus21, CLASS, and 21cmSense; (ii) an explicit BAO/VAO template split (Eq. 1) that isolates the non-monotonic rise and fall of each feature; and (iii) a falsifiable, scale-dependent prediction for the AP bias (Fig. 3). These elements make the paper a useful foundation for future joint cosmological–astrophysical analyses with SKA and related arrays.

major comments (2)
  1. [Calibrating Cosmic Expansion; Eq. (5); Fig. 3] The central ∼2% H(z) claim (abstract; bottom panel of Fig. 3; surrounding text of Eq. 5) is obtained by undamping the raw Pm(k) and Pη(k) templates and treating the η phase as an AP stretch of the matter phase. The paper asserts that this is the maximum offset that can appear in Δ²21 because the 21-cm wiggles are linear functionals of those spectra (Eq. 2). However, the actual O21,BAO and O21,VAO templates already include the full Zeus21 mapping through SFRD, Lyman-α, and X-ray weights βi(k,z). Those weights are scale- and redshift-dependent and can themselves shift peak locations. The manuscript never measures the residual phase offset between the two 21-cm templates after that mapping, nor recomputes α∥ by fitting O21,VAO to a stretched O21,BAO. Without that check, the quoted 2% remains an upper bound that may not be realized in the observable; a direct measurement on the Fig. 1 templa
  2. [Detectability vs. Separability; Discussion; Supplementary §I, Eqs. (6)–(7)] Detectability and separability forecasts (bottom of Fig. 2; Eqs. 3–4) fix the astrophysical model and free only overall amplitudes Anw, ABAO, AVAO. The Discussion and Supplementary §I correctly flag that VAO amplitudes depend on the uncertain Pop III velocity feedback (fη raising Mmol, flat SFEIII). Because the SNR hierarchy (VAOs dominate except near zmin) and the claim that BAOs are not significantly detected both rest on those amplitudes, a minimal sensitivity test—e.g., varying εIII* and fη over the range allowed by the UVLF fits cited—should be shown so that the reader can judge how robust the SKA forecasts remain under the paper’s own stated uncertainty.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; Calibrating Cosmic Expansion] The abstract states “we provide a correction,” yet the text only shows the scale-dependent bias α∥(k) in Fig. 3. An explicit fitting formula or tabulated correction that an analysis pipeline could apply would make the claim actionable.
  2. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption and main text refer to “SKA Optimistic / Moderate” shaded bands, but the precise mapping from 21cmSense noise to the rescaled O21 units is not stated. A short sentence on how σ(k) is divided by Δ²,nw would help reproducibility.
  3. [Supplementary §II; main text Disentangling Acoustic Signatures] Supplementary §II notes that the δ→δb substitution in the T21 prefactor changes high-z acoustic amplitudes by ∼25%. A one-line statement in the main text that the BAO/VAO hierarchy and phase extraction are unaffected at the sub-percent level (as claimed in the Supplement) would reassure readers who do not consult the SM.
  4. [Throughout] Typographical consistency: “zmin ∼18” and “z∼14” appear with and without spaces around ∼; unify notation.
  5. [References] Reference [74] (Montefalcone et al.) is cited for the phase-shift explanation; ensure the arXiv number and year match the final published version if available before acceptance.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: the ~2% H(z) bias is an independent AP stretch of undamped Pm vs Pη templates, not a fit renamed as prediction; Zeus21 self-citations are tool reuse.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Calibrating Cosmic Expansion; citation of Ref. [74] and Zeus21 [80, 81]]
    "Recently, Ref. [74] showed that while BAOs trace oscillations in the baryon density field δb, relative velocities trace η∼δ²b, producing a characteristic phase shift between the “wiggle”-only BAO and VAO templates in Fig. 1... Our dissection is only possible with the rapid fully-analytical public code Zeus21 [80, 81]."

    The phase-shift premise and the 21-cm computation engine are justified by papers with overlapping authors (Montefalcone/Cruz/Muñoz/Kovetz; Muñoz; Cruz/Muñoz). This is ordinary tool/prior-result reuse, not a uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives or a fit that equals the claimed prediction. The ~2% α∥ is recomputed in this work from Pm/Pη templates and is not forced by those citations alone. Flagged only as minor self-citation, not load-bearing circularity.

full rationale

The central claim (percent-level BAO–VAO phase offset biasing H(z) by ~2%) is obtained by isolating normalized wiggle templates Oi(k) from Pm(k) and Pη(k), undamping with fitted envelopes Ei(k), extracting scale-dependent phases φi(k), and mapping the η sinusoid onto a stretched matter sinusoid via the Alcock–Paczyński parameter α∥ (Eq. 5; Fig. 3). That stretch is a derived systematic, not a quantity fitted to 21-cm data and then re-predicted. Amplitudes ABAO and AVAO in the Fisher model (Eq. 3) are free parameters with fiducial unity; they do not define the phase offset. The decomposition Δ²21 = Δ²21,nw[1+O21] with O21 = O21,BAO+O21,VAO is a linearization (cross-terms second order) implemented by alternating wiggle/no-wiggle inputs into Zeus21—an approximation, not a self-definition. Heavy citation of Zeus21 [80, 81] and Muñoz VAO papers [56, 65] is reuse of public code and prior results by overlapping authors; those results are externally falsifiable (semi-numerical comparisons, public CLASS/Zeus21 pipeline) and do not force the 2% number by construction. Baseline extraction follows external BAO methods (Baumann et al.). Minor self-citation of the authors’ own phase-shift paper [74] motivates the calculation but does not close a definitional loop. Correctness concerns (whether astrophysical β weights realign peaks after Zeus21 mapping) are outside circularity. Score 1 for non-load-bearing self-citation only.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central H(z)-bias claim rests on standard ΛCDM transfer functions, the Zeus21 mapping from δ and η to T21, the small-wiggle decomposition with vanishing mixed cross terms, and a specific Pop II/III star-formation model that sets VAO amplitudes. Free parameters enter mainly through SFE and foreground-wedge choices that control detectability, not the existence of the phase offset itself. No new physical entity is postulated; BAO and VAO are established.

free parameters (5)
  • Pop III SFE amplitude ε_III_*
    Fitted to AMORE6 / Pop III UVLF upper limits (Supplementary §I); sets overall VAO strength in forecasts.
  • Atomic-cooling mass threshold M_atom and Pop II SFE double power-law parameters
    Taken from HST+JWST UVLF best fits (Ref. [107] Table E1); control when BAOs overtake VAOs at lower z.
  • Velocity feedback factor f_η raising M_mol
    Parameterized following Ref. [116]; directly scales how strongly η suppresses Pop III star formation and thus VAO amplitude.
  • Foreground wedge parameters (a, b(z)) for optimistic vs moderate SKA scenarios
    Chosen by hand (a=0,b≈1 vs a=0.05 h/Mpc, b≈6); control which acoustic peaks are declared detectable.
  • Envelope and phase nuisance parameters in E_i(k) and φ_i(k)
    Nonlinear least-squares fit to undamp O_i(k) (Supplementary Eqs. 8–10); used to extract the phase difference that drives the ∼2% H(z) claim.
axioms (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Mixed baryon–velocity cross terms in Δ²_21 enter only at vanishing second order, so O_21 = O_BAO + O_VAO.
    Stated in ‘Disentangling Acoustic Signatures’ as the basis for the linear decomposition (Eq. 1); not fully residual-tested.
  • domain assumption Planck 2018 ΛCDM transfer functions from CLASS correctly supply P_m(k) and P_η(k) at the relevant redshifts.
    Standard cosmology input used throughout; velocity templates evaluated at z=50 rather than z_kin.
  • domain assumption Zeus21’s analytic functionals of δ and η faithfully map SFRD → Lyman-α/X-ray → T21 fluctuations for acoustic wiggles.
    Core modeling engine (Refs. [80,81]); acoustic peak positions are argued to be cosmologically frozen.
  • domain assumption Pop II stars in atomic-cooling haloes are effectively immune to streaming velocities; only Pop III molecular-cooling haloes feel η.
    Supplementary §I modeling choice that partitions BAO vs VAO sourcing.
  • ad hoc to paper T_21 prefactor should track baryon density δ_b rather than total matter δ.
    Supplementary §II modification relative to some prior 21-cm literature; authors report sub-percent impact on hierarchy/phase.
  • domain assumption Standard inverse-sine-transform baseline subtraction isolates oscillatory components without biasing phase at the percent level.
    Supplementary §III following Baumann et al. / Hamann et al. style BAO baseline methods.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 26815 in / 3850 out tokens · 40584 ms · 2026-07-14T15:05:08.146893+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Cosmic dawn 21-cm observations will extend standard-ruler cosmology into the first billion years, unlocking epochs inaccessible by the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure. Realizing this promise requires an accurate model of the acoustic structure imprinted onto early star formation. At such early times, two counterbalancing phenomena -- matter overdensities and streaming velocities between cold dark matter and baryons -- modulate the spatial statistics of star formation. While overdensities dictate where early galaxy-bearing haloes form, regions of high velocity suppress star formation. Their combined influence on the intergalactic medium yields 21-cm fluctuations with both baryon (BAO) and velocity-induced (VAO) acoustic oscillations. Here we present the first prescription to decompose the 21-cm power spectrum into its constituent acoustic features. We find a percent-level offset between the BAO and VAO shapes which, if ignored in standard-ruler analyses, would bias inferred values of $H(z)$ by $\sim 2\%$; we provide a correction. Moreover, as the relative prominence of BAOs and VAOs ebbs and flows non-monotonically across cosmic dawn, we demonstrate how their evolution is sensitive to the physics of early galaxy evolution and the first stars. Finally, we forecast how sensitive SKA will be to the BAO-VAO combined standard ruler. Our results establish joint BAO-VAO modeling as an essential ingredient of 21-cm acoustic inference, enabling robust constraints on both cosmic expansion and the first stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09846 by Alessandra Venditti, Ely D. Kovetz, Gabriele Montefalcone, Hector Afonso G. Cruz, Julian B. Mu\~noz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The normalized “wiggle”-only portion of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The extracted scale-dependent phase for wiggles in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

134 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bromm, Formation of the first stars, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 112901 (2013), arXiv:1305.5178 [astro-ph.CO]

    V. Bromm, Formation of the first stars, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 112901 (2013), arXiv:1305.5178 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  2. [2]

    R. S. Klessen and S. C. O. Glover, The First Stars: Formation, Properties, and Impact, ARA&A61, 65 (2023), arXiv:2303.12500 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    S. A. Wouthuysen, On the excitation mechanism of the 21-cm (radio-frequency) interstellar hydrogen emission line., AJ57, 31 (1952)

    1952

  4. [4]

    G. B. Field, The Spin Temperature of Intergalactic Neu- tral Hydrogen., ApJ129, 536 (1959)

    1959

  5. [5]

    Loeb and M

    A. Loeb and M. Zaldarriaga, Measuring the Small-Scale Power Spectrum of Cosmic Density Fluctuations through 21cm Tomography Prior to the Epoch of Structure For- mation, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 211301 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0312134 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    C. M. Hirata, Wouthuysen-Field coupling strength and application to high-redshift 21-cm radiation, MNRAS 367, 259 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0507102 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    S. R. Furlanetto, S. P. Oh, and F. H. Briggs, Cos- mology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transition and the high-redshift Universe, Phys. Rep.433, 181 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608032 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    J. R. Pritchard and A. Loeb, 21 cm cosmology in the 21st century, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 086901 (2012), arXiv:1109.6012 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Ciardi, R

    B. Ciardi, R. Salvaterra, and T. Di Matteo, Lyαversus X- ray heating in the high-z intergalactic medium, MNRAS 401, 2635 (2010), arXiv:0910.1547 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    H. Xu, K. Ahn, J. H. Wise, M. L. Norman, and B. W. O’Shea, Heating the Intergalactic Medium by X-Rays from Population III Binaries in High-redshift Galaxies, ApJ791, 110 (2014), arXiv:1404.6555 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Ewall-Wice, J

    A. Ewall-Wice, J. Hewitt, A. Mesinger, J. S. Dillon, A. Liu, and J. Pober, Constraining high-redshift X-ray sources with next generation 21-cm power spectrum mea- surements, MNRAS458, 2710 (2016), arXiv:1511.04101 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    S. Y. Sazonov and I. I. Khabibullin, Preheating of the early universe by radiation from high-mass X-ray bina- ries, Astronomy Letters43, 211 (2017), arXiv:1612.01262 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    M. P. van Haarlem, M. W. Wise, A. W. Gunst, G. Heald, J. P. McKean,et al., LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency AR- ray, A&A556, A2 (2013), arXiv:1305.3550 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  14. [14]

    Mellema, L

    G. Mellema, L. V. E. Koopmans, F. A. Abdalla, G. Bernardi, B. Ciardi, S. Daiboo, A. G. de Bruyn, K. K. Datta, H. Falcke, A. Ferrara, I. T. Iliev, F. Iocco, V. Jelić, H. Jensen, R. Joseph, P. Labroupoulos, A. Meiksin, A. Mesinger, A. R. Offringa, V. N. Pandey, J. R. Pritchard, M. G. Santos, D. J. Schwarz, B. Semelin, H. Vedantham, S. Yatawatta, and S. Zaro...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    T. C. Voytek, A. Natarajan, J. M. Jáuregui García, J. B. Peterson, and O. López-Cruz, Probing the Dark Ages at z ~20: The SCI-HI 21 cm All-sky Spectrum Experiment, ApJ782, L9 (2014), arXiv:1311.0014 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  16. [16]

    J. D. Bowman, A. E. E. Rogers, R. A. Monsalve, T. J. Mozdzen, and N. Mahesh, An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum, Nature 555, 67 (2018), arXiv:1810.05912 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    A. P. Beardsley, B. J. Hazelton, I. S. Sullivan, P. Car- roll, N. Barry, et al., First Season MWA EoR Power spectrum Results at Redshift 7, ApJ833, 102 (2016), arXiv:1608.06281 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Greig, C

    B. Greig, C. M. Trott, N. Barry, S. J. Mutch, B. Pindor, R. L. Webster, and J. S. B. Wyithe, Exploring reioniza- tion and high-z galaxy observables with recent multired- shift MWA upper limits on the 21-cm signal, MNRAS 500, 5322 (2021), arXiv:2008.02639 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    F. G. Mertens, M. Mevius, L. V. E. Koopmans, A. R. Offringa, G. Mellema, S. Zaroubi, M. A. Brentjens, H. Gan, B. K. Gehlot, V. N. Pandey, A. M. Sardarabadi, H. K. Vedantham, S. Yatawatta, K. M. B. Asad, B. Cia- rdi, E. Chapman, S. Gazagnes, R. Ghara, A. Ghosh, S. K. Giri, I. T. Iliev, V. Jelić, R. Kooistra, R. Mondal, J. Schaye, and M. B. Silva, Improved ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Yoshiura, B

    S. Yoshiura, B. Pindor, J. L. B. Line, N. Barry, C. M. Trott, A. Beardsley, J. Bowman, R. Byrne, A. Chokshi, B. J. Hazelton, K. Hasegawa, E. Howard, B. Greig, D. Ja- cobs, C. H. Jordan, R. Joseph, M. Kolopanis, C. Lynch, B. McKinley, D. A. Mitchell, M. F. Morales, S. G. Mur- ray, J. C. Pober, M. Rahimi, K. Takahashi, S. J. Tingay, 7 R. B. Wayth, R. L. Web...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    C. L. Carilli, S. Furlanetto, F. Briggs, M. Jarvis, S. Rawl- ings, and H. Falcke, Probing the dark ages with the Square Kilometer Array, New A Rev.48, 1029 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0409312 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    S. R. Furlanetto and F. H. Briggs, 21 cm tomography of the high-redshift universe with the Square Kilome- ter Array, New A Rev.48, 1039 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0409205 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2004

  23. [23]

    E. J. Murphy, The Far-Infrared-Radio Correlation at High Redshifts: Physical Considerations and Prospects for the Square Kilometer Array, ApJ706, 482 (2009), arXiv:0910.0011 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    M. G. Santos, M. B. Silva, J. R. Pritchard, R. Cen, and A. Cooray, Probing the first galaxies with the Square KilometerArray,A&A527,A93(2011),arXiv:1009.0950 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Koopmans, J

    L. Koopmans, J. Pritchard, G. Mellema, J. Aguirre, K. Ahn, R. Barkana, I. van Bemmel, G. Bernardi, A. Bonaldi, F. Briggs, A. G. de Bruyn, T. C. Chang, E. Chapman, X. Chen, B. Ciardi, P. Dayal, A. Ferrara, A. Fialkov, F. Fiore, K. Ichiki, I. T. Illiev, S. Inoue, V. Jelic, M. Jones, J. Lazio, U. Maio, S. Majumdar, K. J. Mack, A. Mesinger, M. F. Morales, A. ...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Ghara, T

    R. Ghara, T. R. Choudhury, and K. K. Datta, 21-cm signature of the first sources in the Universe: prospects of detection with SKA, MNRAS460, 827 (2016), arXiv:1511.07448 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    Barry, B

    N. Barry, B. Hazelton, I. Sullivan, M. F. Morales, and J. C. Pober, Calibration requirements for detecting the 21 cm epoch of reionization power spectrum and implications for the SKA, MNRAS461, 3135 (2016), arXiv:1603.00607 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    Hutter, P

    A. Hutter, P. Dayal, V. Müller, and C. M. Trott, Ex- ploring 21cm-Lyman Alpha Emitter Synergies for SKA, ApJ836, 176 (2017), arXiv:1605.01734 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Hassan, S

    S. Hassan, S. Andrianomena, and C. Doughty, Con- straining the astrophysics and cosmology from 21 cm tomography using deep learning with the SKA, MNRAS 494, 5761 (2020), arXiv:1907.07787 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  30. [30]

    Loeb and R

    A. Loeb and R. Barkana, The Reionization of the Uni- verse by the First Stars and Quasars, ARA&A39, 19 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0010467 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    Barkana and A

    R. Barkana and A. Loeb, A Method for separating the physics from the astrophysics of high-redshift 21 cm fluctuations, Astrophys. J. Lett.624, L65 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409572

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  32. [32]

    S. R. Furlanetto, The global 21-centimeter back- ground from high redshifts, MNRAS371, 867 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604040 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    P. J. E. Peebles and J. T. Yu, Primeval adiabatic per- turbation in an expanding universe, Astrophys. J.162, 815 (1970)

    1970

  34. [34]

    R. A. Sunyaev and Y. B. Zeldovich, Small-scale fluc- tuations of relic radiation, Astrophys. Space Sci.7, 3 (1970)

    1970

  35. [35]

    D. N. Spergel et al. (WMAP), First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: Determination of cosmological parameters, Astrophys. J. Suppl.148, 175 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  36. [36]

    Hinshawet al

    G. Hinshawet al. (WMAP), Nine-Year Wilkinson Mi- crowave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cos- mological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl.208, 19 (2013), arXiv:1212.5226 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [37]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmolog- ical parameters, A&A641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [38]

    Louis, A

    T. Louis, A. La Posta, Z. Atkins, H. T. Jense, I. Abril-Cabezas,et al., The Atacama Cosmology Tele- scope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods andΛCDM Parameters, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.14452 (2025), arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    D. J. Eisenstein and W. Hu, Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function, ApJ496, 605 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709112 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  40. [40]

    D. J. Eisensteinet al. (SDSS), Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, Astrophys. J.633, 560 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0501171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Alamet al

    S. Alamet al. (eBOSS), Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103, 083533 (2021), arXiv:2007.08991 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al. (DES), Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1% measurement of the angular baryonic acoustic oscil- lation scale at redshift zeff=0.85 from the final dataset, Phys. Rev. D110, 063515 (2024), arXiv:2402.10696 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    DESI Collaborationet al., DESI DR2 Results II: Mea- surements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmo- logical Constraints, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.14738 (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Tseliakhovich and C

    D. Tseliakhovich and C. Hirata, Relative velocity of dark matter and baryonic fluids and the formation of the first structures, Phys. Rev. D82, 083520 (2010), arXiv:1005.2416 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [45]

    S. Naoz, N. Yoshida, and N. Y. Gnedin, Simulations of Early Baryonic Structure Formation with Stream Velocity. I. Halo Abundance, ApJ747, 128 (2012), arXiv:1108.5176 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Bovy and C

    J. Bovy and C. Dvorkin, Low-mass Suppression of the Satellite Luminosity Function Due to the Supersonic Baryon-Cold-dark-matter Relative Velocity, ApJ768, 70 (2013), arXiv:1205.2083 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    T. H. Greif, S. D. M. White, R. S. Klessen, and V. Springel, The Delay of Population III Star Forma- tion by Supersonic Streaming Velocities, ApJ736, 147 (2011), arXiv:1101.5493 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  48. [48]

    Fialkov, R

    A. Fialkov, R. Barkana, D. Tseliakhovich, and C. M. Hirata, Impact of the relative motion between the dark matter and baryons on the first stars: semi-analytical modelling, MNRAS424, 1335 (2012), arXiv:1110.2111 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    Hirano, N

    S. Hirano, N. Yoshida, Y. Sakurai, and M. S. Fujii, Formation of the First Star Clusters and Massive Star Binaries by Fragmentation of Filamentary Primordial GasClouds,ApJ855,17(2018),arXiv:1711.07315[astro- ph.GA]. 8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    A. T. P. Schauer, S. C. O. Glover, R. S. Klessen, and D. Ceverino, The influence of streaming velocities on the formation of the first stars, MNRAS484, 3510 (2019), arXiv:1811.12920 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Dalal, U.-L

    N. Dalal, U.-L. Pen, and U. Seljak, Large-scale BAO sig- natures of the smallest galaxies, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2010, 007 (2010), arXiv:1009.4704 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    Tseliakhovich, R

    D. Tseliakhovich, R. Barkana, and C. M. Hirata, Sup- pression and spatial variation of early galaxies and mini- haloes, MNRAS418, 906 (2011), arXiv:1012.2574 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Stacy, V

    A. Stacy, V. Bromm, and A. Loeb, Effect of Stream- ing Motion of Baryons Relative to Dark Matter on the Formation of the First Stars, ApJ730, L1 (2011), arXiv:1011.4512 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  54. [54]

    R. M. O’Leary and M. McQuinn, The Formation of the First Cosmic Structures and the Physics of the z~20 Universe, ApJ760, 4 (2012), arXiv:1204.1344 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    S. Naoz, N. Yoshida, and N. Y. Gnedin, Simulations of Early Baryonic Structure Formation with Stream Velocity. II. The Gas Fraction, ApJ763, 27 (2013), arXiv:1207.5515 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    J. B. Muñoz, Robust velocity-induced acoustic oscilla- tions at cosmic dawn, Phys. Rev. D100, 063538 (2019), arXiv:1904.07881 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    J. Yoo, N. Dalal, and U. Seljak, Supersonic relative velocity effect on the baryonic acoustic oscillation mea- surements, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2011, 018 (2011), arXiv:1105.3732 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    Visbal, R

    E. Visbal, R. Barkana, A. Fialkov, D. Tseliakhovich, and C. M. Hirata, The signature of the first stars in atomic hydrogen at redshift 20, Nature487, 70 (2012), arXiv:1201.1005 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  59. [59]

    Ali-Haïmoud, P

    Y. Ali-Haïmoud, P. D. Meerburg, and S. Yuan, New light on 21 cm intensity fluctuations from the dark ages, Phys. Rev. D89, 083506 (2014), arXiv:1312.4948 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Ferraro, K

    S. Ferraro, K. M. Smith, and C. Dvorkin, Supersonic baryon-CDM velocities and CMB B-mode polarization, Phys. Rev. D85, 043523 (2012), arXiv:1110.2182 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    Beutler, U

    F. Beutler, U. Seljak, and Z. Vlah, Constraining the relative velocity effect using the Baryon Oscillation Spec- troscopic Survey, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470, 2723 (2017), arXiv:1612.04720 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Schmidt, Effect of relative velocity and density per- turbations between baryons and dark matter on the clustering of galaxies, Phys

    F. Schmidt, Effect of relative velocity and density per- turbations between baryons and dark matter on the clustering of galaxies, Phys. Rev. D94, 063508 (2016), arXiv:1602.09059 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Schmidt and F

    F. Schmidt and F. Beutler, Imprints of Reionization in Galaxy Clustering, Phys. Rev. D96, 083533 (2017), arXiv:1705.07843 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [64]

    J. J. Givans and C. M. Hirata, Redshift-space streaming velocity effects on the Lyman-αforest baryon acous- tic oscillation scale, Phys. Rev. D102, 023515 (2020), arXiv:2002.12296 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    J. B. Muñoz, Standard Ruler at Cosmic Dawn, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 131301 (2019), arXiv:1904.07868 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Sarkar and E

    D. Sarkar and E. D. Kovetz, Measuring the cosmic ex- pansion rate using 21-cm velocity acoustic oscillations, Phys. Rev. D107, 023524 (2023), arXiv:2210.16853 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    J. B. Muñoz, C. Dvorkin, and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Prob- ing the small-scale matter power spectrum with large- scale 21-cm data, Phys. Rev. D101, 063526 (2020), arXiv:1911.11144 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Zhang, H

    X. Zhang, H. Lin, M. Zhang, B. Yue, Y. Gong, Y. Xu, and X. Chen, Velocity Acoustic Oscillations on Cos- mic Dawn 21 cm Power Spectrum as a Probe of Small- scale Density Fluctuations, Astrophys. J.964, 62 (2024), arXiv:2401.14234 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Verwohlt, C

    J. Verwohlt, C. A. Mason, J. B. Muñoz, F.-Y. Cyr- Racine, M. Vogelsberger, and J. Zavala, Separating dark acoustic oscillations from astrophysics at cosmic dawn, Phys. Rev. D110, 103533 (2024), arXiv:2404.17640 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Libanore, J

    S. Libanore, J. Flitter, E. D. Kovetz, Z. Li, and A. Dekel, Effects of feedback-free starburst galaxies on the 21-cm signal and reionization history, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.532, 149 (2024), arXiv:2310.03021 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    S. C. Hotinli, D. J. E. Marsh, and M. Kamionkowski, Probing ultralight axions with the 21-cm signal dur- ing cosmic dawn, Phys. Rev. D106, 043529 (2022), arXiv:2112.06943 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    S. C. Hotinli, T. Binnie, J. B. Muñoz, B. R. Dinda, and M. Kamionkowski, Probing compensated isocurvature with the 21-cm signal during cosmic dawn, Phys. Rev. D104, 063536 (2021), arXiv:2106.11979 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [73]

    H. A. G. Cruz, T. Adi, J. Flitter, M. Kamionkowski, and E. D. Kovetz, 21-cm fluctuations from primor- dial magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D109, 023518 (2024), arXiv:2308.04483 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Montefalcone, H

    G. Montefalcone, H. A. G. Cruz, J. B. Muñoz, E. D. Kovetz, and M. Kamionkowski, Tracing the neutrino- induced phase shift in the 21-cm spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 113, 063556 (2026), arXiv:2509.03595 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    Ma and E

    C.-P. Ma and E. Bertschinger, Cosmological Perturba- tion Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newto- nian Gauges, ApJ455, 7 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9506072 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  76. [76]

    O. Hahn, C. Rampf, and C. Uhlemann, Higher order ini- tial conditions for mixed baryon-CDM simulations, MN- RAS503, 426 (2021), arXiv:2008.09124 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  77. [77]

    McQuinn and R

    M. McQuinn and R. M. O’Leary, The Impact of the Supersonic Baryon-Dark Matter Velocity Difference on the z ~20 21 cm Background, ApJ760, 3 (2012), arXiv:1204.1345 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [78]

    Kulkarni, E

    M. Kulkarni, E. Visbal, and G. L. Bryan, The Crit- ical Dark Matter Halo Mass for Population III Star Formation: Dependence on Lyman-Werner Radiation, Baryon-dark Matter Streaming Velocity, and Redshift, ApJ917, 40 (2021), arXiv:2010.04169 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    J. B. Muñoz and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Cosmic Variance of the 21-cm Global Signal, Phys. Rev. D103, 023512 (2021), arXiv:2005.03664 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    J. B. Muñoz, An effective model for the cosmic-dawn 21- cm signal, MNRAS523, 2587 (2023), arXiv:2302.08506 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.