Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 292 references

UNIONS Lyman-break galaxies work for cosmology through cross-correlations, not auto-clustering, at z around 2.5.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 14:24 UTC pith:XH23DCJO

load-bearing objection Solid first large-area UNIONS LBG cross-correlation result: auto fails, cross works, systematics mostly add variance not bias. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09943 v1 pith:XH23DCJO submitted 2026-07-10 astro-ph.CO

Assessing the large-scale angular clustering of UNIONS Lyman Break Galaxies via cross-correlations

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords Lyman-break galaxiesangular power spectrumCMB lensingcross-correlationimaging systematicsUNIONShigh-redshift clusteringprimordial non-Gaussianity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper asks whether Lyman-break galaxies selected from UNIONS multi-band photometry can serve as cosmological tracers of large-scale structure above redshift 2. Direct angular clustering of the galaxies themselves is ruined on large scales by survey imaging variations (depth, seeing, dust, stars), even after linear and non-linear corrections. Cross-correlating the same galaxies with independent maps that do not share those systematics—Planck CMB lensing and two quasar samples—recovers a signal whose amplitude matches simple theory. Residual imaging problems mainly inflate the error bars rather than bias the mean signal. That result turns a faint, systematics-limited photometric sample into a usable high-redshift tracer for future growth and non-Gaussianity studies.

Core claim

Spatially varying imaging systematics prevent a usable LBG auto-angular power spectrum on large scales, but the LBG–CMB lensing cross-power spectrum (and LBG–quasar cross-spectra) can be measured more robustly, with amplitude consistent with theoretical predictions; residual systematics appear mainly as excess variance without significant bias in the recovered signal, establishing UNIONS LBGs as reliable tracers for cross-correlation cosmology at z ~ 2.5.

What carries the argument

Cross-power spectra between the UNIONS LBG overdensity and external tracers (Planck PR4 CMB lensing, DESI DR1 quasars, Quaia), after linear de-projection or Random-Forest weighting of the LBG field; the cross-spectrum is largely insensitive to imaging systematics that dominate the auto-spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The redshift distribution measured on a tiny overlapping field, together with a simple rescaled bias model, is assumed good enough to judge that the full-sky cross-spectrum amplitude matches theory.

What would settle it

A spectroscopic or clustering-redshift n(z) for the full UNIONS LBG sample that shifts the expected LBG–CMB lensing cross-power amplitude well outside the measured error bars would falsify the claimed consistency.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper evaluates UNIONS u-dropout LBGs (r~23.5–24.2) as high-z (z~2.5) large-scale structure tracers. It shows that spatially varying imaging systematics (PSF depth, seeing, extinction, stellar density) severely contaminate the LBG auto-angular power spectrum on large scales (ℓ≲300), even after linear namaster deprojection or non-linear regressis Random Forest weighting, leaving residual power far above fiducial models. Cross-correlations with Planck PR4 CMB lensing and with DESI DR1/Quaia quasars are far more robust: mocks with controlled linear/non-linear contamination and data-driven weights recover the input C_ℓ^κg without significant bias, while residual systematics mainly inflate variance (Jackknife/Gaussian ratio ~3–15). The measured LBG–κ and LBG–QSO spectra have amplitudes consistent with a fiducial model (XMM-LSS n(z), Wilson & White bias rescaled by free b0≈0.65, magnification+RSD), establishing the sample for cross-correlation cosmology and illustrating the excess-variance impact on f_loc_NL constraints.

Significance. If the robustness claim holds, the work provides a practical path for Stage-IV photometric LBG samples (UNIONS, LSST, CSST) to contribute to high-z growth and local PNG measurements via cross-correlations, where auto-spectra are compromised by depth/seeing variations near survey limits. Strengths include explicit controlled contamination–decontamination tests (Appendix C, linear α=1 and non-linear α=3 models plus data-driven RF weights applied to mocks), direct Jackknife-versus-Gaussian covariance comparison (Fig. 7, Table 1), and transparent demonstration that systematics primarily add variance rather than bias the cross-signal. These elements make the feasibility result falsifiable and useful for survey strategy and analysis pipelines.

major comments (2)
  1. §5.1 and Fig. 6 (left): The claim that the measured C_ℓ^κg amplitude is “consistent with theoretical predictions” rests on the XMM-LSS photometric n(z) (~2 deg²) plus the Wilson & White (2019) bias prescription rescaled by a free b0≈0.65 taken from prior clustering-redshift work. Because the u-dropout kernel is broad and the full-footprint selection is magnitude-limited near survey depth, spatial variations in completeness could shift the effective n(z) or bias. The absolute-amplitude comparison is therefore only weakly diagnostic; a full-footprint clustering-redshift validation (or at least a quantitative assessment of n(z) variation) is needed before the consistency statement can be regarded as load-bearing support for sample reliability.
  2. §4.1: Footprint cleaning removes Dec>75° and the Ra∈[150,180], Dec∈[20,45] region “by hand” / “by eye” after inspecting PSF/seeing maps. While motivated by visible patterns, the procedure is not fully reproducible and changes the effective area from ~2800 to ~2400 deg². The impact of these cuts on both the recovered cross-spectrum amplitude and the Jackknife covariance should be quantified (e.g., by repeating the analysis with and without the manual masks) so that residual systematics can be cleanly separated from selection effects.
minor comments (5)
  1. Appendix A title and text contain the typo “agular” (should be “angular”).
  2. Fig. 4 caption and surrounding text note that neither angular mode removal nor deprojection noise bias has been applied; a short quantitative statement of their expected size relative to the residual power would help the reader judge the residual contamination.
  3. §5.1 retains the first multipole bin (0<ℓ<30) “for completeness” while correctly warning that the mode-coupling matrix is poorly conditioned. Given that f_loc_NL sensitivity is largest on these scales, either drop the bin from all fits or show explicitly that its inclusion/exclusion does not change the Table 1 posteriors beyond the already-large Jackknife errors.
  4. Several figure panels (e.g., Fig. 3, Fig. 17) would benefit from a common vertical scale or an explicit statement of the mean density used for the overdensity, so that the size of the residual trends after correction can be compared directly.
  5. The manuscript header carries a future date (“Version July 14, 2026”); this should be corrected for the published version.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mild self-citation of prior n(z)/bias models for amplitude comparison; central robustness claim (cross recovers input, systematics add variance not bias) is independently supported by mocks and data.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 5.1 (theoretical curves overplotted on Fig. 6 left; also Table 1 and Appendix A.1)]
    "the LBG linear bias b(z) modeled following Wilson & White (2019), with an overall rescaling b′(z)=b0b(z), where b0=0.65 was found to provide a good description of the LBG bias inferred from clustering measurements for the same LBG selection (see Payerne et al. 2025a)"

    The claim of amplitude consistency with “theoretical predictions” relies on a bias amplitude fixed from the authors’ own prior work on the identical LBG selection. While that prior measurement used independent data (clustering redshifts), the present paper’s absolute comparison is therefore partially self-referential; the free refit of b0 in the f_NL analysis recovers a compatible value, confirming the mild circularity is not forced but still present for the consistency statement.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain for its strongest claim—that LBG–CMB lensing (and LBG–QSO) cross-spectra are robust to imaging systematics while the auto-spectrum is not—is self-contained and non-circular. Controlled contamination mocks (linear/non-linear analytic models in Appendix C; data-driven RF weights from regressis applied to mocks in Fig. 5) demonstrate recovery of the input C_ℓ^κg without bias, with residuals appearing only as excess variance. Jackknife vs Gaussian covariance comparisons and the observed data points in Fig. 6 further support this differentially. The absolute amplitude comparison to a “fiducial theoretical prediction” does invoke n(z) measured on XMM-LSS plus a Wilson & White bias prescription rescaled by b0 = 0.65 taken from the authors’ prior clustering-redshift analysis (Payerne et al. 2025a). This is a minor self-citation, but it is not load-bearing: the same paper freely refits b0 (Table 1) and obtains a compatible value, the mocks themselves use an independent fiducial, and the no-bias conclusion does not require the absolute normalization. No equation forces a measured quantity to equal a fitted input by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and no ansatz is smuggled. Score 2 reflects only the non-central self-citation; the core result stands independently.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard projected clustering formalism, publicly available external maps, and two free amplitude parameters (overall bias rescaling and f_NL) that are fitted rather than predicted. No new physical entities are introduced; the main modeling choices are conventional domain assumptions about linear bias, magnification, and the form of imaging contamination.

free parameters (2)
  • b0 (overall bias rescaling of Wilson & White 2019 prescription) = 0.6–0.8
    Fitted to the cross-spectrum amplitude; best-fit values ~0.6–0.8 appear in Table 1 and are used to claim consistency with theory.
  • f_loc_NL = order ±350 (JK)
    Fitted in the simplified PNG exercise of Section 5.2; the large Jackknife errors are themselves a result of residual systematics.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Linear bias plus scale-dependent PNG correction of the form Δb ∝ f_NL / k² is an adequate description of LBG clustering on the scales ℓ < 300.
    Invoked throughout Sections 2 and 5 and Appendix A; standard in the literature but not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Imaging systematics that affect the LBG density map are uncorrelated with the Planck CMB lensing map and with the DESI/Quaia quasar density maps.
    Core justification for preferring cross-spectra (Section 4 and 5); supported by mock tests but remains an assumption about the external datasets.
  • domain assumption The photometric redshift distribution measured on the ~2 deg² XMM-LSS field is representative of the full ~2400 deg² cleaned UNIONS footprint.
    Used to generate the theoretical C_ℓ curves in Figure 6; validated only partially by earlier clustering-redshift work on a subset of the footprint.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 26613 in / 2564 out tokens · 29974 ms · 2026-07-14T14:24:29.918293+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs), selected via the strong spectral break blueward of the Lyman limit, are powerful tracers of large-scale structure at redshifts $z>2$. In this work, we assess the feasibility of using LBGs selected from the Ultraviolet Near Infrared Optical Northern Survey (UNIONS) multi-band photometric catalog as cosmological probes of the high-redshift Universe using two-point statistics. We demonstrate that spatially varying imaging systematics, driven by variations in PSF depth, seeing across the UNIONS footprint, limit robust measurements of the LBG auto-angular power spectrum on large scales, even after correcting the LBG field with linear or non-linear mitigation techniques. This study shows that clustering analyses of faint galaxy samples close to survey depth are challenging. We therefore turn to cross-correlation measurements with external tracers, in particular the \textit{Planck} CMB lensing convergence and quasars from DESI DR1 and \textit{Quaia}, which are less sensitive to the angular imaging systematics. Using both data and mock catalogues, we demonstrate that the LBG--CMB lensing cross-power spectrum can be measured more robustly than the auto-spectrum, with an amplitude consistent with theoretical predictions. Residual systematics primarily manifest as excess variance at large angular scales, without introducing a significant bias in the recovered signal. Taken together, these results establish UNIONS-selected LBGs as reliable tracers for cross-correlation cosmology at $z\sim 2.5$, and highlight cross-correlation techniques as a powerful and robust avenue for extracting cosmological information from photometric high-redshift galaxy samples in the presence of complex imaging systematics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09943 by Alan W. McConnachie, Calum Murray, Christophe Y\`eche, Constantin Payerne, Hendrik Hildebrandt, Kenneth C. Chambers, Martin Kilbinger, Scott Chapman, Thomas de Boer, William d'Assignies Doumerg.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: HEALPix pixel coverage for the GAaP footprint. Right: Local density of selected u-dropout galaxies (in deg−2 ), corrected from surface coverage. left panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: color-color diagram of UNIONS galaxies, with u-dropout selected objects shown in blue. Red points correspond to stars (specified with the flag OBJ TYPE hsc==1 in the CLAUDS+HSC catalogs). Right: Photometric redshift distribution of the u-dropout galaxies, compared to the redshift distribution of all galaxies before applying the u-dropout selection. rPSFsize < 1. We also remove by hand some ”bad” pho￾… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Upper panels: LBG overdensity as a function of UNIONS survey characteristics (left: 5σ PSF depth, right: PSF size in arcsec). Lower panels: Overdensity as a function of external templates (left: Galactic extinction E(B − V ), right: stellar density). Solid lines correspond to the uncorrected LBG field, while dashed lines show the results after deprojection with namaster. different telescopes, varying depth… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Angular power spectrum of the LBG density field before and after mitigation with namaster (note that neither angular mode removal nor deprojection noise bias has been applied). Dots refer to the catalog-based approach in namaster, when full lines denote for the HEALPix-based namaster method. The curve at the bottom of the plot corresponds to a fiducial model for the LBG angular clustering amplitude, … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Angular power spectrum of a mock LBG density map, shown before and after contamination using the UNIONS LBG regressis Random Forest (RF) weight map, and before and after mitigation with namaster and regressis. Right: Same as left, but for the cross-correlation spectrum between the mock LBG density maps and CMB lensing maps. The CMB photons are gravitationally lensed by the in￾tervening large-scale st… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Angular power spectrum between UNIONS LBGs (or DESI DR1 QSOs) and the Planck PR4 CMB lensing map. Right: Angular power spectrum between the UNIONS LBGs and the DESI DR1 QSO sample, as well as the Quaia sample. ing Surveys and two infrared bands (W1, W2) from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) and was ex￾tensively validated during the DESI Survey Validation campaign. The final quasar targe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: Ratio of the diagonal elements of the Jackknife covariance matrix to those of the Gaussian-only covariance matrix. Right: Two-dimensional posterior distribution of f loc NL and b0 inferred from the C κg ℓ measurements, using either the theoretical or Jackknife covariance. further methodological developments or more stringent control of large-scale survey systematics. In contrast, cross-correlation me… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: UNIONS PSF depth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: UNIONS image quality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Summary of UNIONS PSF depth and UNIONS image quality [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left: Angular power spectrum of mock LBG density maps, contaminated and decontaminated using a linear contamination model (Awan et al. 2025) (i.e., α = 1 in Eq. (14)), with the same C gg ℓ used for both the original contaminated map and the mocks. Right: Same as left, but for the cross-correlation between the mock LBG density maps and the CMB lensing maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Left: Jackknife binning scheme of the default UNIONS LBG footprint. Right: Ratio between (i) the variance of diverse estimated cross-correlation angular power spectra between mock LBGs and mock CMB lensing maps, where the LBG maps were either contaminated or corrected and (ii) the un-contaminated variance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Random Forest regressis systematic weights [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: regressis systematic weights versus UNIONS imaging features (left: 5σ PSF depth, right= PSF size) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Variance of the auto and cross-spectrum (theory, standard deviation over 100 simulations, Jackknife) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_19.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

292 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 16 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Tukey, J. W. , year =. Unknown title , journal =

  2. [2]

    B-mode validation for cosmic shear

    UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: II. B-mode validation for cosmic shear. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.03227 , archivePrefix =. 2604.03227 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    2D Cosmological Constraints in Configuration Space

    UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: III. 2D Cosmological Constraints in Configuration Space. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.13547 , archivePrefix =. 2605.13547 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    2D cosmological constraints in harmonic space

    UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: IV. 2D cosmological constraints in harmonic space. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.13543 , archivePrefix =. 2605.13543 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    A Galaxy Shape Catalogue in the Northern Sky

    UNIONS-3500 Weak Lensing: I. A Galaxy Shape Catalogue in the Northern Sky. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2605.13549 , archivePrefix =. 2605.13549 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    Mitigating Systematic Errors in Angular Correlation Function Measurements from Wide Field Surveys

    Mitigating systematic errors in angular correlation function measurements from wide field surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2103 , archivePrefix =. 1509.04290 , primaryClass =

  7. [8]

    Recovering Redshift Distributions with Cross-Correlations: Pushing The Boundaries

    Recovering redshift distributions with cross-correlations: pushing the boundaries. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt410 , archivePrefix =. 1303.0292 , primaryClass =

  8. [9]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1508.007 , year = 2015, month = aug, eid =

    TreeCorr: Two-point correlation functions. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1508.007 , year = 2015, month = aug, eid =

  9. [10]

    ASCL , year = 2011, month = aug, eid =

    BPZ: Bayesian Photometric Redshift Code , keywords =. ASCL , year = 2011, month = aug, eid =

  10. [11]

    , keywords =

    The construction of large-scale structure catalogs for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/01/125 , archivePrefix =. 2405.16593 , primaryClass =

  11. [12]

    , keywords =

    Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from Quaia. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/056 , archivePrefix =. 2504.20992 , primaryClass =

  12. [13]

    , keywords =

    The CFHT large area U-band deep survey (CLAUDS). , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2522 , archivePrefix =. 1909.05898 , primaryClass =

  13. [14]

    , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: magnification modelling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1594 , archivePrefix =. 2209.09782 , primaryClass =

  14. [15]

    Euclid preparation. XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142419 , archivePrefix =. 2110.05435 , primaryClass =

  15. [16]

    Full calibration of the tomographic redshift distribution from the HSC PDR3 Shape Catalog with DESI

    Full calibration of the tomographic redshift distribution from the HSC PDR3 Shape Catalog with DESI. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.18133 , archivePrefix =. 2511.18133 , primaryClass =

  16. [17]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Clustering-redshifts and importance sampling of Self-Organised-Maps n(z) realizations for 3 2 pt samples. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.23565 , archivePrefix =. 2510.23565 , primaryClass =

  17. [18]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Sampling Bayesian probabilities given only sampled priors. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.00758 , archivePrefix =. 2506.00758 , primaryClass =

  18. [19]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Clustering-based redshift estimation: method and application to data. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1303.4722 , archivePrefix =. 1303.4722 , primaryClass =

  19. [20]

    , keywords =

    Euclid: Photometric redshift calibration performance with the clustering-redshifts technique in the Flagship 2 simulation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555551 , archivePrefix =. 2505.10416 , primaryClass =

  20. [21]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    KiDS-Legacy: Redshift distributions and their calibration. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.19440 , archivePrefix =. 2503.19440 , primaryClass =

  21. [22]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1910.13970 , archivePrefix =. 1910.13970 , primaryClass =

  22. [23]

    Computing in Science and Engineering , keywords =

    Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , adsurl =

  23. [24]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim++ Lens Sample. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.07964 , archivePrefix =. 2509.07964 , primaryClass =

  24. [25]

    , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: redshift calibration of the weak lensing source galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1515 , archivePrefix =. 2012.08566 , primaryClass =

  25. [26]

    , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: clustering redshifts - calibration of the weak lensing source redshift distributions with redMaGiC and BOSS/eBOSS. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3311 , archivePrefix =. 2012.08569 , primaryClass =

  26. [27]

    , keywords =

    MASTER of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Power Spectrum: A Fast Method for Statistical Analysis of Large and Complex Cosmic Microwave Background Data Sets. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/338126 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0105302 , primaryClass =

  27. [28]

    , keywords =

    A unified pseudo-C _ framework. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz093 , archivePrefix =. 1809.09603 , primaryClass =

  28. [29]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

    Primordial non-Gaussianity from the large-scale structure. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/12/124011 , archivePrefix =. 1003.5020 , primaryClass =

  29. [30]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    QuasarNET: Human-level spectral classification and redshifting with Deep Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1808.09955 , archivePrefix =. 1808.09955 , primaryClass =

  30. [32]

    Primordial non-Gaussianities with weak lensing: Information on non-linear scales in the Ulagam full-sky simulations

    Primordial non-Gaussianities with weak lensing: information on non-linear scales in the ULAGAM full-sky simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/03/062 , archivePrefix =. 2310.02349 , primaryClass =

  31. [33]

    , keywords =

    Scale-dependent local primordial non-Gaussianity as a solution to the S8 tension. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.063501 , archivePrefix =. 2404.03244 , primaryClass =

  32. [34]

    , keywords =

    Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/589982 , archivePrefix =. 0805.1409 , primaryClass =

  33. [36]

    , keywords =

    Can we actually constrain f _ NL using the scale-dependent bias effect? An illustration of the impact of galaxy bias uncertainties using the BOSS DR12 galaxy power spectrum. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/013 , archivePrefix =. 2205.05673 , primaryClass =

  34. [37]

    Primordial Non-Gaussianity and the Statistics of Weak Lensing and other Projected Density Fields

    Primordial non-Gaussianity and the statistics of weak lensing and other projected density fields. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.123005 , archivePrefix =. 1104.0926 , primaryClass =

  35. [38]

    , keywords =

    KiDS-1000 catalogue: Redshift distributions and their calibration. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039018 , archivePrefix =. 2007.15635 , primaryClass =

  36. [39]

    , keywords =

    Estimating the redshift distribution of photometric galaxy samples. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13510.x , archivePrefix =. 0801.3822 , primaryClass =

  37. [40]

    , keywords =

    CFHTLenS and RCSLenS: testing photometric redshift distributions using angular cross-correlations with spectroscopic galaxy surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2241 , archivePrefix =. 1512.03626 , primaryClass =

  38. [41]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Constraining primordial non-Gaussianity from DESI DR1 quasars and Planck PR4 CMB Lensing. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2512.17865 , archivePrefix =. 2512.17865 , primaryClass =

  39. [42]

    , keywords =

    Impact of redshift distribution uncertainties on Lyman-break galaxy cosmological parameter inference. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2115 , archivePrefix =. 2506.06475 , primaryClass =

  40. [43]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic microwave background lensing reconstruction on the full sky. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.67.083002 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301031 , primaryClass =

  41. [44]

    , keywords =

    Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0601594 , primaryClass =

  42. [45]

    , year = 1953, month = jan, volume =

    The Analysis of Counts of the Extragalactic Nebulae in Terms of a Fluctuating Density Field. , year = 1953, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1086/145672 , adsurl =

  43. [46]

    Abazajian, Kevork and Abdulghafour, Arwa and Addison, Graeme E and Adshead, Peter and Ahmed, Zeeshan and Ajello, Marco and Akerib, Daniel and Allen, Steven W and Alonso, David and Alvarez, Marcelo and Amin, Mustafa A and Amiri, Mandana and Anderson, Adam and Ansarinejad, Behzad and Archipley, Melanie and Arnold, Kam S and Ashby, Matt and Aung, Han and Bac...

  44. [47]

    , keywords =

    Cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization pseudo-C _ l estimators and covariances. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09111.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410394 , primaryClass =

  45. [48]

    and Davis, Tamara M

    Alexander, David M. and Davis, Tamara M. and Chaussidon, E. and Fawcett, V. A. and Gonzalez-Morales, Alma X. and Lan, Ting-Wen and Y. The Astronomical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ACACFC , eprint =

  46. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , month =

    Alonso, David , eprint =. arXiv e-prints , month =

  47. [50]

    Alves, Otavio , journal =

  48. [51]

    and Mena-Fern

    Andrade, U. and Mena-Fern. arXiv e-prints , month =. arXiv , arxivId =:2404.07282 , file =

  49. [52]

    and Hahn, Oliver , doi =

    Angulo, Raul E. and Hahn, Oliver , doi =. Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:2112.05165 , file =

  50. [53]

    and Pontzen, Andrew , doi =

    Angulo, Raul E. and Pontzen, Andrew , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1603.05253 , file =

  51. [54]

    and Ramos, P

    Antoja, T. and Ramos, P. and Mateu, C. and Helmi, A. and Anders, F. and Jordi, C. and Carballo-Bello, J. A. , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:2001.10012 , file =

  52. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , month =

    Bahr-Kalus, Benedict and Parkinson, David and Mueller, Eva-Maria , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , month =

  53. [56]

    Bailey, Stephen J , journal =

  54. [57]

    , keywords =

    GaaP: PSF- and aperture-matched photometry using shapelets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066601 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0610606 , primaryClass =

  55. [58]

    , keywords =

    The fourth data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey: ugri imaging and nine-band optical-IR photometry over 1000 square degrees. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834918 , archivePrefix =. 1902.11265 , primaryClass =

  56. [59]

    , keywords =

    The Lyman- forest from LBGs: First 3D correlation measurement with DESI and prospects for cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/053 , archivePrefix =. 2507.21852 , primaryClass =

  57. [60]

    , keywords =

    The effective field theory of large-scale structure and multi-tracer. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/021 , archivePrefix =. 2108.11363 , primaryClass =

  58. [61]

    , keywords =

    Taking the weight off: mitigating parameter bias from catastrophic outliers in 3 2pt analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/037 , archivePrefix =. 2509.08052 , primaryClass =

  59. [62]

    , keywords =

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07773 , primaryClass =

  60. [63]

    , keywords =

    Galaxy bias and primordial non-Gaussianity: insights from galaxy formation simulations with IllustrisTNG. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/12/013 , archivePrefix =. 2006.09368 , primaryClass =

  61. [64]

    and Paviot, Romain and

    Bautista, Julian E. and Paviot, Romain and. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2800 , eprint =

  62. [65]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629178 , eprint =

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629178 , eprint =

  63. [66]

    arXiv , arxivId =:2412.10279 , journal =

    Bermejo-Climent, Jos. arXiv , arxivId =:2412.10279 , journal =

  64. [67]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Beutler, Florian and Castorina, Emanuele and Zhang, Pierre , doi =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1810.05051 , file =

  65. [68]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Beutler, Florian and. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/048 , eprint =

  66. [69]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , number =

    Beutler, Florian and McDonald, Patrick , doi =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:2106.06324 , file =

  67. [70]

    and Eisenstein, Daniel J

    Beutler, Florian and Saito, Shun and Seo, Hee Jong and Brinkmann, Jon and Dawson, Kyle S. and Eisenstein, Daniel J. and Font-Ribera, Andreu and Ho, Shirley and McBride, Cameron K. and Montesano, Francesco and Percival, Will J. and Ross, Ashley J. and Ross, Nicholas P. and Samushia, Lado and Schlegel, David J. and S. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomic...

  68. [71]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Beutler, Florian and Seo, Hee Jong and Saito, Shun and Chuang, Chia Hsun and Cuesta, Antonio J and Eisenstein, Daniel J and Gil-Mar. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3298 , eprint =

  69. [72]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Biagetti, Matteo and Lazeyras, Titouan and Baldauf, Tobias and Desjacques, Vincent and Schmidt, Fabian , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1611.04901 , file =

  70. [73]

    Bianchi, David and Hanif, M. M. S and Rosell, A. Carnero and Lasker, J. and Ross, A. J. and Pinon, M. and de Mattia, A. and White, M. and Ahlen, S. and Bailey, S. and Brooks, D. and Burtin, E. and Chaussidon, E. and Claybaugh, T. and Cole, S. and de la Macorra, A. and Ferraro, S. and Font-Ribera, A. and Forero-Romero, J. E. and Gazta. arXiv , arxivId =:24...

  71. [74]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Blas, Diego and Lesgourgues, Julien and Tram, Thomas , doi =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1104.2933 , file =

  72. [75]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , eprint =

    Blondel, Mathieu and Berthet, Quentin and Cuturi, Marco and Frostig, Roy and Hoyer, Stephan and Llinares-L. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , eprint =

  73. [76]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , number =

    Bose, Benjamin and Byun, Joyce and Lacasa, Fabien and Dizgah, Azadeh Moradinezhad and Lombriser, Lucas , doi =. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , number =. arXiv , arxivId =:1909.02504 , file =

  74. [77]

    and Willner, S

    Breiding, Peter and Chiaberge, Marco and Lambrides, Erini and Meyer, Eileen T. and Willner, S. P. and Hilbert, Bryan and Haas, Martin and Miley, George and Perlman, Eric S. and Barthel, Peter and O'Dea, Christopher P. and Capetti, Alessandro and Wilkes, Belinda and Baum, Stefi A. and Macchetto, Duccio F. and Sparks, William and Tremblay, Grant and Norman,...

  75. [78]

    Physical Review D , keywords =

    Brieden, Samuel and Gil-Mar. Physical Review D , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L121301 , eprint =

  76. [79]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Brieden, Samuel and Gil-Mar. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/054 , eprint =

  77. [80]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =

    Brieden, Samuel and Gil-Mar. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/09/052 , eprint =

  78. [81]

    Brodzeller, Allyson and Dawson, Kyle and Bailey, Stephen and Yu, Jiaxi and Ross, A. J. and Bault, A. and Filbert, S. and Aguilar, J. and Ahlen, S. and Alexander, David M. and Armengaud, E. and Berti, A. and Brooks, D. and Chaussidon, E. and de la Macorra, A. and Doel, P. and Fanning, K. and Fawcett, V. A. and Font-Ribera, A. and Gontcho, S. Gontcho A and ...

  79. [82]

    arXiv , arxivId =:2403.18789 , journal =

  80. [83]

    and Percival, W

    Burden, A. and Percival, W. J. and Howlett, C. , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =. arXiv , arxivId =:1504.02591 , file =

Showing first 80 references.