Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Two radio surveys with no shared frequencies or angular scales still map the same Galactic Faraday-depth patterns, implying magnetised ISM structures couple across scales.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 14:16 UTC pith:XOA2VE3T

load-bearing objection Solid empirical Letter: LoTSS and DRAGONS M1 maps and structure functions really do agree despite disjoint frequency and scale coverage; the coupling claim is plausible but rests on imperfectly matched M1. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09964 v1 pith:XOA2VE3T submitted 2026-07-10 astro-ph.GA

Faraday depth similarities across scales with LoTSS & DRAGONS

Anna Ordog , Rebecca A. Booth , Ana Erceg , Vibor Jeli\'c , Jo-Anne C. Brown , Marijke Haverkorn , Alex S. Hill , T.L. Landecker This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Faraday depthmagnetised ISMdiffuse synchrotron emissionLoTSSDRAGONSstructure functionspolarisationGalactic magnetic fields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Diffuse Galactic synchrotron emission is Faraday-rotated by the magnetised interstellar medium, but interferometers and single-antenna telescopes sample very different ranges of angular size and Faraday depth. This paper compares polarised-intensity-weighted mean Faraday depth (first-moment) maps from LoTSS (120–168 MHz, interferometric) and DRAGONS (350–1030 MHz, single-antenna) over the same northern-sky regions. Despite zero frequency overlap and radically different spatial-scale sensitivity, the maps are morphologically similar, show strong pixel-by-pixel correlation, and share the same large-scale gradient previously seen in LoTSS. Structure functions of the first-moment maps agree from roughly 4° to 40°, and more than half the lines of sight have matching numbers and locations of spectral peaks. The authors interpret this as evidence that large-scale magneto-ionic structure is imprinted on the small-scale fluctuations that interferometers detect, so both instrument classes can trace the same physical features. Differences that remain are attributed to depolarisation or local breakdowns of the scale coupling.

Core claim

Despite no overlap in frequency or spatial-scale coverage, LoTSS and DRAGONS first-moment Faraday-depth maps display remarkable morphological agreement, strong pixel-by-pixel correlation (Pearson R ≈ 0.8), and structure-function slopes that match from ~4° to ~40°. This demonstrates that magnetised ISM structures couple across spatial scales, allowing both interferometric and single-antenna observations to recover the same large-scale Faraday-depth features.

What carries the argument

First-moment (M1) maps: the polarised-intensity-weighted average Faraday depth along each line of sight. M1 collapses complex Faraday spectra into a single large-scale map that can be compared pixel-by-pixel and via structure functions, revealing shared morphology even when peak-FD maps disagree.

Load-bearing premise

Agreement in the polarised-intensity-weighted mean Faraday depth, after heavy down-sampling of LoTSS and without correcting polarisation bias or matching Faraday resolution, is taken as proof that the two instruments see correlated magnetised volumes rather than shared artefacts.

What would settle it

Correct polarisation bias and instrumental leakage in LoTSS, recompute M1 on the same grid, and check whether the Pearson correlation and structure-function slope agreement with DRAGONS survive; if either drops sharply, the cross-scale coupling claim fails.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Interferometric polarisation surveys can recover large-angular-scale Faraday patterns even when total-intensity large-scale emission is filtered out.
  • Future overlapping-frequency surveys (e.g., POSSUM + PEGASUS) can isolate the physical scale-coupling effect from frequency-dependent depolarisation.
  • Differences that remain after bias correction will flag local ISM configurations where scale coupling breaks down or depolarisation dominates.
  • Structure-function slopes of M1 provide a practical metric for quantifying how far the coupling extends across the sky.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coupling is real, low-frequency interferometric data alone may be sufficient to map the large-scale Galactic magnetic field geometry, reducing the need for single-antenna absolute-zero-spacing measurements in some analyses.
  • The same cross-scale imprint should appear in Faraday-depth structure functions of other interferometric surveys once they are compared to single-antenna data, offering a quick consistency check.
  • Polarisation-bias correction and RM-CLEAN of LoTSS may further tighten the already-high M1 correlation, turning residual outliers into clean tracers of local breakdowns.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper compares polarised-intensity-weighted mean Faraday depths (first moments M1) of diffuse Galactic synchrotron emission between the interferometric LoTSS survey (120–168 MHz, ~5.5′ resolution) and the single-antenna DRAGONS survey (350–1030 MHz, 3.6° resolution) in two common Galactic mosaics. Despite no overlap in frequency coverage or recoverable spatial/Faraday-depth scales, the M1 maps are morphologically similar (with only small boundary shifts), show strong pixel-by-pixel correlations (R ≈ 0.8, near-unity slopes), and exhibit comparable second-order structure-function slopes over ~4°–40°. Example Faraday-depth spectra often share peak locations and numbers; differences are attributed to depolarisation, beam effects, or local ISM conditions. The authors interpret the agreement as evidence of coupling across spatial scales in the magnetised ISM, allowing both instrument types to trace the same large-scale features.

Significance. If the morphological and statistical agreement is physical rather than an artefact of processing, the result is significant for multi-scale Galactic magnetism studies: it demonstrates that interferometric data can recover coherent large-angular-scale Faraday-depth patterns from small-scale fluctuations, and that single-antenna and interferometric surveys can be used jointly even without matched frequency or resolution. The work is timely for upcoming overlapping surveys (POSSUM, PEGASUS) and supplies concrete observational constraints on depolarisation horizons and cross-scale coupling. Strengths include use of publicly available cubes, standard statistics (M1, structure functions, peak matching), explicit documentation of limitations (polarisation bias, RMSF differences, leakage), and clear data-availability statements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 2, Appendix C, Fig. 2] Sect. 2 and Appendix C: LoTSS is down-sampled from 5.5′ to ~1° via ud_grade on the PI cubes (not Stokes Q/U, which fully depolarise) without any RMSF smoothing to match DRAGONS’ 6 rad m^{-2} width. Appendix C itself shows that residual polarisation bias systematically pulls LoTSS M1 toward zero and that peak-FD maps (Fig. B.3) already agree less well than M1. Because the central claim of cross-scale coupling rests on M1 morphological similarity and the near-unity M1–M1 slopes (Fig. 2), the paper needs a quantitative test (bias-corrected M1 maps, or a controlled RMSF-matched comparison on a subset of sight-lines) to demonstrate that the agreement survives these unmatched observational effects rather than being partly driven by them.
  2. [Sect. 3, Fig. 3] Sect. 3 and Fig. 3: The structure-function slopes (0.61 ± 0.01 for LoTSS, 0.67 ± 0.01 for DRAGONS) are reported as “moderately strong agreement” over 0.6 < log(δθ) < 1.6, yet they do not overlap within the stated uncertainties and the fit range is chosen after visual inspection of linearity. Given that the coupling interpretation hinges on these slopes tracing the same large-scale power, the paper should either (i) justify the exact fit interval a priori or with a formal break-point analysis, or (ii) show that the conclusion is robust to reasonable variations of the interval and to separate northern/southern mosaics (already partially shown in Fig. B.2).
  3. [Sect. 4] Sect. 4: The statement that “Faraday depth spectra show consistent numbers and locations of peaks for more than half of the pixels” is load-bearing for the claim that the surveys probe correlated volumes, yet no quantitative algorithm or threshold for “consistent” is given (visual inspection of a few examples in Fig. 4 is insufficient). A simple automated peak-matching statistic (e.g., fraction of pixels with at least one LoTSS peak within δϕ of a DRAGONS peak, after accounting for the different RMSF widths) should be reported so that the “more than half” claim can be verified and the coupling inference placed on firmer ground.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption and colour bar: the M1 colour scale is labelled only once; repeating the unit (rad m^{-2}) on both northern and southern panels would improve readability.
  2. [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 and Appendix C spectra: the vertical M1 lines are helpful, but the differing PI units (mJy beam^{-1} RMSF^{-1} vs K RMSF^{-1}) make amplitude comparisons difficult; a brief note in the caption that absolute PI scales are not directly comparable would help.
  3. [Appendix A] Table A.1: the LoTSS maximum angular scale is listed as “~1° –”; clarifying whether the dash means “no formal limit” or “filtered beyond ~1°” would remove ambiguity.
  4. Throughout: a few minor typographical inconsistencies appear (e.g., “LoTSS-DR2 vlow” vs “LoTSS vlow”, occasional missing spaces before units). A final proof-read would catch them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical multi-survey comparison with no circular derivation; M1, correlations and structure functions are computed directly from independent published cubes.

full rationale

The paper performs a direct observational comparison of two independently reduced Faraday-depth cubes (LoTSS and DRAGONS). First moments M1, pixel-by-pixel Pearson correlations, second-order structure functions and peak matching are standard summary statistics applied after simple regridding and masking; none of these quantities is defined in terms of the claimed cross-scale coupling, nor is any free parameter fitted to one survey and then used to “predict” the other. Self-citations (Erceg et al. 2022/2024, Ordog et al. 2026, Booth et al. 2026) merely supply the input data products and prior morphological descriptions of the same maps; they do not furnish a uniqueness theorem, an ansatz, or a load-bearing theoretical premise that forces the observed agreement. Differences (RMSF widths, polarisation bias, beam depolarisation) are explicitly discussed rather than defined away. Consequently the central claim—that morphological and statistical similarity implies coupling across spatial scales—rests on external data, not on a self-referential construction. Score 0 is therefore appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is observational. Load-bearing inputs are standard Faraday synthesis formalism, published survey cubes, and conventional moment/structure-function statistics. Free choices are analysis thresholds and fit ranges, not physical free parameters of a model. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)
  • M1 integration range |ϕ|<50 rad m^{-2}
    Chosen much smaller than |ϕ_max| of both surveys; affects which spectral power enters the weighted mean used for the central maps.
  • PI detection thresholds (DRAGONS 6σ; LoTSS mean+5σ adaptive)
    Masking thresholds control which pixels enter the M1 maps and correlations; taken from prior survey papers but still analysis choices.
  • Structure-function linear fit range 0.6<log(δθ)<1.6
    Slope comparison that supports the ‘similar large-scale structure’ claim depends on this hand-chosen angular range.
  • Healpix nside=64 (~1°) common grid
    Down-sampling choice that discards LoTSS resolution while avoiding full convolution depolarisation; central to the pixel-by-pixel comparison.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Faraday depth spectrum is the Fourier transform of complex polarised intensity vs λ², convolved with the RMSF (Brentjens & de Bruyn 2005).
    Foundation of all FD cubes and M1 calculations; standard in the field, invoked throughout Sect. 1–2.
  • domain assumption M1 (polarised-intensity-weighted mean FD) is a valid two-dimensional proxy for comparing Faraday rotation structures between surveys with different spectral complexity.
    Stated in Sect. 3 as preferred over peak FD; the central morphological and correlation claims rest on this choice.
  • ad hoc to paper Similarity of M1 morphology and structure-function slopes implies coupling of magnetised structures across spatial scales rather than pure coincidence of unrelated volumes.
    Interpretive step in Sect. 3–5 and abstract; not independently proven, but is the physical conclusion drawn from the observational agreement.
  • domain assumption Polarised point sources in LoTSS are sparse enough not to dominate diffuse M1 after ~1° binning.
    Sect. 2 cites O’Sullivan et al. 2023; residual contamination is later noted as a possible discrepancy source in Appendix C.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 17350 in / 3318 out tokens · 42541 ms · 2026-07-14T14:16:14.111759+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Faraday rotation of diffuse Galactic synchrotron emission is a powerful tracer of the complex, magnetised interstellar medium (ISM), whose structures span a wide range of spatial scales, requiring both interferometric and single-antenna broadband radio polarisation observations for full characterisation. We compare Faraday rotation in the interferometric LOw-Frequency ARray Two-Metre Sky Survey (LoTSS; 120-168 MHz) and the single-antenna Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory Global Magneto-Ionic Medium Survey of the Northern Sky (DRAGONS; 350-1030 MHz), which are complementary in their sensitivity to spatial and Faraday-depth scales. We calculate first moments (M1) of polarised intensity versus Faraday depth, producing polarised-intensity-weighted mean Faraday depth maps of the regions common to both surveys. These maps show remarkable agreement between the surveys despite the lack of overlap in frequency or spatial-scale coverage. In the northern Galactic region, the M1 maps are morphologically similar with only small spatial shifts in the boundaries between positive and negative M1, and strong pixel-by-pixel correlation. In the southern Galactic region, both surveys trace the Faraday-depth gradient with Galactic longitude previously identified in LoTSS. Faraday depth spectra show consistent numbers and locations of peaks for more than half of the pixels. The strong structural similarity between the surveys, demonstrated by computing structure functions, suggests coupling across spatial scales in the magnetised ISM, enabling both interferometric and single-antenna observations to trace the same features. Instances of differences point to ISM configurations where observational effects such as depolarisation dominate or where this coupling breaks down due to local physical conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.09964 by Alex S. Hill, Ana Erceg, Anna Ordog, Jo-Anne C. Brown, Marijke Haverkorn, Rebecca A. Booth, T.L. Landecker, Vibor Jeli\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: First moment (M1) maps for LoTSS (top) and DRAGONS (bottom) for the region covered by the LoTSS northern (left) and southern (right) mosaics. The contours on all panels trace the M1=0 rad m−2 boundary in LoTSS. Apart from the outline of the mosaic, the masked out (grey) regions correspond to low signal-to-noise regions in either LoTSS or DRAGONS. the beam encompasses increasing physical volume with LOS dis… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: M1 - M1 plots, directly comparing the M1 values of DRAGONS versus LoTSS for the pixels in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Second order structure functions of M1 in the combined mosaic maps for LoTSS (grey circles) and DRAGONS (black diamonds). The solid grey (black dashed) line shows the LoTSS (DRAGONS) slope fit￾ted over 0.6 < log(δθ) < 1.6. The vertical dashed blue line indicates the DRAGONS resolution and the dotted purple line indicates the counts of pixel pairs in the calculation. 0.0 0.2 (a) = 150.5 b = 36.4 LoTSS M1 DR… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of LoTSS (solid grey) and DRAGONS (dashed black) spectra highlighting similar and differing sight-lines with M1 values in￾dicated by corresponding vertical lines. Red dotted lines indicate the EG RM value from the Hutschenreuter et al. (2022) Galactic Faraday rotation map, which in the case of panel (b) is outside the displayed ϕ range. Note the differing units for PI in LoTSS and DRAGONS. M1 (tra… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The Faraday Rotation Measure Grid of the LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey: Data Release 2. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3820 , archivePrefix =. 2301.07697 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3820

  2. [2]

    An In-depth Investigation of Faraday Depth Spectrum Using Synthetic Observations of Turbulent MHD Simulations

    An In-Depth Investigation of Faraday Depth Spectrum Using Synthetic Observations of Turbulent MHD Simulations. Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies7040089 , archivePrefix =. 1911.09029 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3390/galaxies7040089 1911

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    A Three-dimensional Model for the Reversal in the Local Large-scale Interstellar Magnetic Field. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae28d1 , archivePrefix =. 2512.03332 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae28d1

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Faraday rotation measure synthesis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507349 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052990

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    The Galactic Magneto-ionic Medium Survey: Moments of the Faraday Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf85f , archivePrefix =. 1812.05399 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf85f

  6. [6]

    Dickey and Jennifer West and Alec J

    John M. Dickey and Jennifer West and Alec J. M. Thomson and T. L. Landecker and A. Bracco and E. Carretti and J. L. Han and A. S. Hill and Y. K. Ma and S. A. Mao and A. Ordog and Jo-Anne C. Brown and K. A. Douglas and A. Erceg and V. Jelić and R. Kothes and M. Wolleben , doi =. Structure in the Magnetic Field of the Milky Way Disk and Halo Traced by Farad...

  7. [7]

    Faraday tomography of LoTSS-DR2 data. I. Faraday moments in the high-latitude outer Galaxy and revealing Loop III in polarisation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142244 , archivePrefix =. 2203.01351 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142244

  8. [8]

    Faraday tomography of LoTSS-DR2 data. III. Revealing the Local Bubble and the complex of local interstellar clouds in the high-latitude inner Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450082 , archivePrefix =. 2406.14679 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450082

  9. [9]

    Structure in the polarized Galactic synchrotron emission, in particular `depolarization canals'

    Structure in the polarized Galactic synchrotron emission, in particular ``depolarization canals''. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200400051 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0408115 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200400051

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    The Outer Scale of Turbulence in the Magnetoionized Galactic Interstellar Medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/587165 , archivePrefix =. 0802.2740 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/587165

  11. [11]

    The Galactic Faraday depth sky revisited

    The Galactic Faraday depth sky revisited. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935479 , archivePrefix =. 1903.06735 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935479 1903

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    The Galactic Faraday rotation sky 2020. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140486 , archivePrefix =. 2102.01709 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140486 2020

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Linear polarization structures in LOFAR observations of the interstellar medium in the 3C 196 field. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526638 , archivePrefix =. 1508.06650 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526638

  14. [14]

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. V. Second data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 , archivePrefix =. 2202.11733 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142484

  15. [15]

    The Galactic latitude dependency of Faraday complexity in the S-PASS/ATCA RM catalogue

    The Galactic latitude dependency of Faraday complexity in the S-PASS/ATCA RM catalogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348993 , archivePrefix =. 2403.13500 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348993

  16. [16]

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. II. First data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833559 , archivePrefix =. 1811.07926 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833559

  17. [17]

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. I. Survey description and preliminary data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , archivePrefix =. 1611.02700 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629313

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , archivePrefix =. 1305.3550 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220873

  19. [19]

    The Global Magneto-Ionic Medium Survey: Polarimetry of the Southern Sky from 300 to 480 MHz

    The Global Magneto-Ionic Medium Survey: Polarimetry of the Southern Sky from 300 to 480 MHz. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab22b0 , archivePrefix =. 1905.12685 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab22b0 1905

  20. [20]

    The Global Magneto-Ionic Medium Survey: A Faraday Depth Survey of the Northern Sky Covering 1280-1750 MHz

    The Global Magneto-ionic Medium Survey: A Faraday Depth Survey of the Northern Sky Covering 1280-1750 MHz. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf7c1 , archivePrefix =. 2106.00945 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abf7c1

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    The Southern Twenty-centimetre All-sky Polarization Survey (STAPS): Survey description and maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453326 , archivePrefix =. 2501.14203 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453326

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    S-band Polarization All-Sky Survey (S-PASS): survey description and maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz806 , archivePrefix =. 1903.09420 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnras/stz806 1903

  23. [23]

    Galactic interstellar filaments as probed by LOFAR and Planck

    Galactic interstellar filaments as probed by LOFAR and Planck. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv123 , archivePrefix =. 1508.06652 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv123

  24. [24]

    ascl , author =:2005.003 , howpublished =

    2005

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Faraday moments of the Southern Twenty-centimeter All-sky Polarization Survey (STAPS). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449556 , archivePrefix =. 2406.06166 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449556

  26. [26]

    A pioneering experiment combining single-antenna and aperture-synthesis data to measure Faraday rotation with GMIMS and the CGPS

    A Pioneering Experiment Combining Single-antenna and Aperture-synthesis Data to Measure Faraday Rotation with GMIMS and the CGPS. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc929 , archivePrefix =. 2501.10623 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc929

  27. [27]

    Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies , year = 2009, editor =

    The Faraday rotation measure synthesis technique. Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Stars and Galaxies , year = 2009, editor =. doi:10.1017/S1743921309031421 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1017/s1743921309031421 2009

  28. [28]

    B. Uyan. Radio Polarization from the Galactic Plane in Cygnus , volume =. ApJ , month =. doi:10.1086/346234 , issn =

    doi:10.1086/346234

  29. [29]

    Galaxies , keywords =

    Is There a Polarization Horizon?. Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies6040129 , archivePrefix =. 1810.12008 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3390/galaxies6040129

  30. [30]

    Multi-frequency polarimetry of the Galactic radio background around 350 MHz. I. A region in Auriga around l = 161 deg, b = 16 deg. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030432 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0303575 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030432

  31. [31]

    Multi-frequency polarimetry of the Galactic radio background around 350 MHz. II. A region in Horologium around l = 137degr , b = 7degr. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030530 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0304087 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030530

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Three-dimensional structure of the magnetic field in the disk of the Milky Way. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730740 , archivePrefix =. 1704.08663 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730740

  33. [33]

    and Landecker, T

    Ordog, Anna and Booth, Rebecca A. and Landecker, T. L. and Carretti, Ettore and Hill, Alex S. and Brown, Jo-Anne C. and Davydov, Artem and Caffarello, Leonardo Moutinho and Galler, Luca B. and Flygare, Jonas and West, Jennifer L. and Willis, A. G. and Tahani, Mehrnoosh and Hovey, G. J. and Lagoy, Dustin and Harrison, Stephen and Smith, Michael A. and Baar...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae2471 2026

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    The Polarisation Sky Survey of the Universe's Magnetism (POSSUM): Science goals and survey description. , keywords =. doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10031 , archivePrefix =. 2505.08272 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10031 2025

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    RM-Tools: Software for Analyzing Polarized Radio Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3dea , archivePrefix =. 2601.20092 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae3dea