Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Electric field induced Berry curvature dipole in quasi-one-dimensional Bi$_4$I$_4$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An out-of-plane electric field turns on and strongly amplifies the Berry curvature dipole in bilayer Bi4I4, especially the β phase, while monolayers stay nearly rigid.

desk verdict Solid first BCD map of few-layer α/β-Bi4I4 under gate field; bilayer enhancement is real within PBE, but the quantitative peak sizes sit on known small-gap errors. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11188 v1 pith:NV5LOHH2 submitted 2026-07-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Amiya Mondal , Awadhesh Narayan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nonlinearHalleffectBerrycurvaturedipoleBi4I4electric-fieldtuningquasi-one-dimensionalmaterialsRashbasplittingfirst-principlescalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that few-layer Bi4I4, a quasi-one-dimensional bismuth halide, can host a large, electrically tunable nonlinear Hall response even though time-reversal symmetry is preserved. Using first-principles calculations for both α and β stacking phases, the authors show that an out-of-plane electric field breaks inversion symmetry and generates a finite Berry curvature dipole. Monolayer bands remain almost rigid under the field and produce only modest dipoles, whereas bilayers undergo progressive Rashba splitting; the β bilayer even closes its gap. These band rearrangements produce Berry-curvature-dipole magnitudes far larger than those of the corresponding monolayers. The work therefore presents bilayer Bi4I4 as a concrete materials platform in which a laboratory-scale electric field can switch on and continuously tune a second-order Hall current.

What carries the argument

The Berry curvature dipole (BCD) tensor D_αβ, the first momentum-space moment of the Berry curvature of occupied states. An out-of-plane electric field lowers the crystal symmetry so that selected BCD components become allowed; their magnitude is then set by how strongly the field rearranges near-degenerate bands.

What would settle it

Fabricate gated bilayer β-Bi4I4 devices, apply an out-of-plane field of ~1 V/nm, and measure whether a second-harmonic transverse current of the predicted size and symmetry (only D_xz allowed) appears while the longitudinal response remains ordinary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In both α- and β-Bi4I4, the bilayer architecture under an out-of-plane electric field of order 1 V/nm develops a substantially larger Berry curvature dipole than the corresponding monolayer. The largest response occurs for bilayer β-Bi4I4, where the same field also drives progressive Rashba splitting and eventual gap closure; the resulting D_xz component is estimated to produce a measurable nonlinear Hall current density of order 10^{-7} A/m under typical experimental drive conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative BCD values rest on density-functional band structures whose small gaps and near-degeneracies can shift under more accurate exchange-correlation or many-body treatments.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents first-principles DFT+Wannier calculations of the Berry curvature dipole (BCD) in monolayer and bilayer Bi4I4 for both α and β phases, under an out-of-plane electric field E_ext. Symmetry analysis identifies the allowed BCD tensor components (D_xz, D_yz for α; only D_xz for β once inversion and C2y are broken). Monolayers show rigid gaps (~0.05–0.07 eV) and modest field-induced BCD, while bilayers exhibit progressive Rashba splitting, stronger Berry-curvature hotspots near near-degeneracies, and substantially larger field-tunable BCD (largest D_xz ~1 Å in bilayer β at E_ext=1 V/nm). A semiclassical estimate then yields a second-harmonic nonlinear Hall current density of order 10^{-7} A/m for representative τ and E_x, positioning quasi-1D bismuth halogenides as a platform for electric-field-engineered NLHE.

Significance. If the bilayer enhancement and field tunability survive more accurate electronic-structure methods, the work supplies a concrete, symmetry-guided materials platform for nonlinear Hall transport in a quasi-1D van-der-Waals family already known for topological phases. The systematic mono/bi comparison, residual-mirror constraints on the BCD tensor, and explicit current estimate are useful contributions. Strengths include a clean Sodemann–Fu implementation (QE+PAW-PBE+SOC o Wannier90 Bi/I p o wannier-berri), transparent symmetry analysis (Eq. 4), and momentum-resolved ∂xΩz maps that link microscopic hotspots to the macroscopic dipole. These elements make the qualitative layer- and field-dependence credible even if absolute magnitudes shift under better functionals.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methodology, §§III–IV, Figs. 2 & 5] Methodology and §§III–IV (Figs. 2, 5 and associated BCD peaks): the claimed substantial bilayer BCD enhancement and the quantitative D_xz ≈ 1 Å used for the current estimate rest on PBE gaps of ~0.05 eV and the precise locations/characters of near-degeneracies and Rashba-split crossings. PBE is known to underestimate or close such gaps and to misplace band inversions in Bi-halide topological systems; a hybrid-functional or GW check (or at least a scissor-corrected recalculation of the dominant BCD peaks) is required to establish that the bilayer superiority and gap-closure trend survive. Without this, the central quantitative claim remains at risk.
  2. [§V, Eq. (5)] §V and Eq. (5): the nonlinear-current estimate adopts D_xz ≈ 1 Å (taken from the PBE bilayer-β peak), τ = 10^{-12} s and E_x = 100 V/m to obtain j^(2ω) ~ 10^{-7} A/m. While the parameters are labeled representative, the result is presented as evidence of experimental viability. Because the dipole magnitude itself is sensitive to the XC-functional issue above, the estimate should be recomputed (or bounded) with any corrected BCD values, and the text should more clearly separate the robust qualitative tunability from the absolute current scale.
  3. [Methodology, §§III–IV] Application of E_ext (Methodology and §§III–IV): it is not stated whether ionic positions are re-relaxed under the field or whether a rigid-potential (sawtooth) approximation is used, nor is dielectric screening or possible structural reconstruction discussed. For fields up to 1 V/nm that drive gap closure in bilayer β, a brief check of force convergence or a statement that the geometry remains stable is needed to support the axiom that the DFT treatment remains valid.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§V and Introduction] Section heading “V. ESTIMA TION…” contains a spurious space; likewise “ab−initio” uses a non-standard hyphen throughout.
  2. [Methodology] k-mesh and energy-window convergence for the BCD integrals (wannier-berri) are not reported; a short statement that the D_xz peaks are stable under denser sampling would strengthen reproducibility.
  3. [Figs. 2, 5] Figs. 2 and 5 color bars for Ω are labeled only as “2 100-100 Ω 0”; units and the precise energy window for the color map should be clarified in the captions.
  4. [§§III.B.2, IV.B.2] The supplemental figures for monolayers are referenced but not described in the main text beyond “see Fig. S1”; a one-sentence summary of the key monolayer contrast would improve readability for readers who do not immediately consult the SI.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: BCD and NLHE estimates are computed ab initio from DFT via the standard Sodemann–Fu integral; no parameters are fitted to the target response.

full rationale

The paper’s derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Electronic structures are obtained from DFT (PBE+SOC, Quantum ESPRESSO), projected onto Wannier Hamiltonians, and Berry curvature is evaluated with the Kubo formula (Eq. 3). The BCD tensor is then the standard first-moment integral of that curvature over occupied states (Eq. 2 / Sodemann–Fu). Symmetry analysis only identifies which tensor components are allowed once inversion is broken by E_ext; it does not prescribe their magnitudes. Field-dependent band structures and BCD peaks (Figs. 2, 5 and supplements) are direct numerical outputs of this pipeline, not fitted quantities. The order-of-magnitude current estimate in §V inserts explicitly labeled “typical experimental parameters” (τ = 10^{-12} s, E_x = 100 V/m) into the semiclassical formula (Eq. 5); these are not inverted from any measured Hall signal. Self-citations (e.g., prior Narayan-group reviews or calculations on other materials) supply only background context and are not load-bearing for the Bi4I4 BCD values or the bilayer-enhancement claim. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or fitted input is smuggled in to force the central result. The computation is therefore independent of its own conclusions by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard DFT machinery, the Sodemann–Fu BCD formula, and a handful of computational and illustrative parameters. No new physical entities are postulated. The main domain assumptions are the adequacy of PBE+SOC for the small-gap electronic structure and the validity of the constant-τ Boltzmann estimate for the nonlinear current.

free parameters (3)
  • carrier relaxation time τ = 10^{-12} s
    Set by hand to 10^{-12} s in §V to convert BCD into a numerical current density; not computed from first principles.
  • AC driving-field amplitude E_x = 100 V/m
    Chosen as a representative laboratory value (100 V/m) for the order-of-magnitude current estimate in §V.
  • maximum out-of-plane field E_ext range = 0–1.0 V/nm
    Scanned from 0 to 1.0 V/nm by hand; the upper end is a computational choice that drives the reported gap closure and peak BCD.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Sodemann–Fu expression for the nonlinear conductivity and BCD tensor (Eqs. 1–2) correctly captures the second-order Hall response in time-reversal-symmetric crystals.
    Invoked throughout; taken from Ref. [5] without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption PBE-GGA plus self-consistent SOC yields band gaps and near-degeneracies accurate enough for quantitative BCD evaluation.
    All electronic structures and Berry curvatures are obtained at this level (Methodology).
  • domain assumption Maximally localized Wannier functions on Bi and I p orbitals faithfully reproduce the DFT bands near the Fermi level for Berry-curvature interpolation.
    Stated in Methodology; no spread or band-reproduction error metrics supplied.
  • ad hoc to paper An external out-of-plane electric field can be applied without structural reconstruction or dielectric screening that would invalidate the rigid-potential DFT treatment.
    Implicit in all field-dependent calculations; no ionic relaxation under field is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electric field induced Berry curvature dipole in quasi-one-dimensional Bi$_4$I$_4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NV5LOHH2

@misc{pith2026260711188,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electric field induced Berry curvature dipole in quasi-one-dimensional Bi$_4$I$_4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NV5LOHH2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11188}
}
abstract

The nonlinear Hall effect in time-reversal symmetric materials offers a powerful probe into quantum geometry. Here, we investigate the electric-field-tunable nonlinear Hall response in few-layer $\text{Bi}_4\text{I}_4$ using comprehensive first-principles calculations across both its $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases. Guided by symmetry analysis, we track the evolution of the Berry curvature dipole (BCD) tensor from the monolayer to the bilayer configuration under an out-of-plane electric field. While the monolayer features a highly rigid band structure and modest BCD tunability, the bilayer architecture exhibits substantial field-induced band modifications, including a progressive Rashba splitting and eventual gap closure in the $\beta$ phase. Crucially, this field-tunability allows substantial enhancement of the BCD magnitude relative to the monolayer counterpart. Our findings establish quasi-one-dimensional bismuth halogenides as a promising platform for engineering nonlinear Hall response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11188 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Structure of bulk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Variation of band structure and BCD with applied electric field, E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Distribution of the Berry curvature derivative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a). The lattice parameters are a = 14.386 ˚A, b = 4.430 ˚A, c = 10.493 ˚A, and β = 107.9 ◦ [10, 41, 44]. The β phase is metastable and has been observed to read￾ily transform into the α phase upon cooling from growth temperature to ambient conditions. B. Electronic st…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Variation of the electronic band structure and BCD with the applied E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Momentum-space distribution of the Berry curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    In this arrangement, the top and bottom layers maintain iden- tical atomic orientations

    Bilayer results We begin by looking at the bilayerα-Bi 4I4 system, which comprises of two monolayers stacked along the crystallographicc-axis in anAA ′ configuration. In this arrangement, the top and bottom layers maintain iden- tical atomic orientations. However, the upper layer is translated by half a lattice vector along theb-axis rela- tive to the low...

  2. [2]

    S1(a) of the supplemental material [43], which is notably larger than that of the bilayer configuration

    Monolayer results In its pristine state, monolayerα-Bi 4I4 is a narrow-gap insulator, exhibiting a direct band gap of approximately 0.07 eV upon the inclusion of SOC, see Fig. S1(a) of the supplemental material [43], which is notably larger than that of the bilayer configuration. As established in the preceding section, the broken inversion symme- try in ...

  3. [3]

    The bilayer architecture is constructed via anAA- type stacking sequence of monolayers along the crystal- lographicc-direction, as illustrated in Fig

    Bilayer results As before, we begin by considering the bilayer struc- ture. The bilayer architecture is constructed via anAA- type stacking sequence of monolayers along the crystal- lographicc-direction, as illustrated in Fig. 4(a). In its pristine state, the crystal symmetry of bilayerβ-Bi 4I4 comprises a twofold rotation axisC 2y, a mirror plane Mxz, an...

  4. [4]

    Both DFT computations and experimental observations have robustly classified bulkβ-Bi 4I4 as a weak topological insulator [27, 40, 44]

    Monolayer Results Prior to assessing the field-dependent BCD properties of monolayerβ-Bi 4I4, we briefly comment on its under- lying topological character. Both DFT computations and experimental observations have robustly classified bulkβ-Bi 4I4 as a weak topological insulator [27, 40, 44]. As weak topological phases emerge from the weak ver- tical coupli...

    2023

  5. [5]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized hall resistance, Physical review letters45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  6. [6]

    Du, H.-Z

    Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, Nonlinear hall effects, Na- ture Reviews Physics3, 744 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    C. Ortix, Nonlinear hall effect with time-reversal symme- try: Theory and material realizations, Advanced Quan- tum Technologies4, 2100056 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Non- linear hall effects: Mechanisms and materials, Materials Today Electronics8, 100101 (2024)

    2024

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum nonlinear hall effect induced by berry curvature dipole in time-reversal invari- ant materials, Physical review letters115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    J.-S. You, S. Fang, S.-Y. Xu, E. Kaxiras, and T. Low, Berry curvature dipole current in the transition metal dichalcogenides family, Physical Review B98, 121109 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Son, K.-H

    J. Son, K.-H. Kim, Y. Ahn, H.-W. Lee, and J. Lee, Strain engineering of the berry curvature dipole and valley mag- netization in monolayer mos 2, Physical review letters 123, 036806 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Ma, S.-Y

    Q. Ma, S.-Y. Xu, H. Shen, D. MacNeill, V. Fatemi, T.-R. Chang, A. M. Mier Valdivia, S. Wu, Z. Du, C.-H. Hsu, et al., Observation of the nonlinear hall effect under time- reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature565, 337 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlin- ear anomalous hall effect in few-layer wte2, Nature ma- terials18, 324 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Huang, S

    J. Huang, S. Li, C. Yoon, J. S. Oh, H. Wu, X. Liu, N. Dhale, Y.-F. Zhou, Y. Guo, Y. Zhang,et al., Room- temperature topological phase transition in quasi-one- dimensional material b i 4 i 4, Physical Review X11, 031042 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    N. B. Joseph and A. Narayan, Topological properties of bulk and bilayer 2m ws2: a first-principles study, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 465001 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. Van Den Brink, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Elec- trically tuneable nonlinear anomalous hall effect in two- dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides wte2 and mote2, 2D Materials5, 044001 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. B. Joseph, and A. Narayan, Elec- trically switchable giant berry curvature dipole in sil- icene, germanene and stanene, 2D Materials9, 035013 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    J. I. Facio, D. Efremov, K. Koepernik, J.-S. You, I. Sode- mann, and J. v. d. Brink, Strongly enhanced berry dipole at topological phase transitions in bitei, arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02680 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Yu, Z.-G

    X.-Q. Yu, Z.-G. Zhu, J.-S. You, T. Low, and G. Su, Topological nonlinear anomalous nernst effect in strained transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B99, 201410 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    C. Zeng, S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Non- linear nernst effect in bilayer wte 2, Physical Review B 100, 245102 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    C. Zeng, S. Nandy, and S. Tewari, Fundamental relations for anomalous thermoelectric transport coefficients in the nonlinear regime, Physical Review Research2, 032066 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Kumar, C.-H

    D. Kumar, C.-H. Hsu, R. Sharma, T.-R. Chang, P. Yu, J. Wang, G. Eda, G. Liang, and H. Yang, Room- temperature nonlinear hall effect and wireless radiofre- quency rectification in weyl semimetal tairte4, Nature Nanotechnology16, 421 (2021). 9

    2021

  15. [23]

    C. Zeng, S. Nandy, and S. Tewari, Nonlinear transport in weyl semimetals induced by berry curvature dipole, Physical Review B103, 245119 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Matsyshyn and I

    O. Matsyshyn and I. Sodemann, Nonlinear hall acceler- ation and the quantum rectification sum rule, Physical review letters123, 246602 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Singh, J

    S. Singh, J. Kim, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, Engi- neering weyl phases and nonlinear hall effects in t d-mote 2, Physical review letters125, 046402 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Roy and A

    S. Roy and A. Narayan, Non-linear hall effect in multi- weyl semimetals, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 385301 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    J.-J. Zhou, W. Feng, C.-C. Liu, S. Guan, and Y. Yao, Large-gap quantum spin hall insulator in single layer bis- muth monobromide bi4br4, Nano letters14, 4767 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    J.-J. Zhou, W. Feng, G.-B. Liu, and Y. Yao, Topological edge states in single-and multi-layer bi4br4, New Journal of Physics17, 015004 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    X. Peng, X. Zhang, X. Dong, D. Ma, D. Chen, Y. Li, J. Li, J. Han, Z. Wang, C.-C. Liu,et al., Observation of topological edge states onα-bi4br4 nanowires grown on tise2 substrates, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters12, 10465 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    M. Yang, Y. Liu, W. Zhou, C. Liu, D. Mu, Y. Liu, J. Wang, W. Hao, J. Li, J. Zhong,et al., Large-gap quantum spin hall state and temperature-induced lifshitz transition in bi4br4, ACS nano16, 3036 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Zhuang, J

    J. Zhuang, J. Li, Y. Liu, D. Mu, M. Yang, Y. Liu, W. Zhou, W. Hao, J. Zhong, and Y. Du, Epitaxial growth of quasi-one-dimensional bismuth-halide chains with atomically sharp topological non-trivial edge states, ACS nano15, 14850 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Zhang, C.-W

    R.-W. Zhang, C.-W. Zhang, W.-X. Ji, S.-S. Yan, and Y.-G. Yao, First-principles prediction on bismuthylene monolayer as a promising quantum spin hall insulator, Nanoscale9, 8207 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    S. Yu, J. Deng, W. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, N. Dhale, S. Li, W. Ma, Z. Wang, P. Wu,et al., Observation of robust one-dimensional edge channels in a three-dimensional quantum spin hall insulator, Physical Review X14, 041048 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    K.-S. Lin, G. Palumbo, Z. Guo, Y. Hwang, J. Blackburn, D. P. Shoemaker, F. Mahmood, Z. Wang, G. A. Fiete, B. J. Wieder,et al., Spin-resolved topology and partial axion angles in three-dimensional insulators, Nature com- munications15, 550 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    J. Deng, D. Shao, J. Gao, C. Yue, H. Weng, Z. Fang, and Z. Wang, Twisted nodal wires and three-dimensional quantum spin hall effect in distorted square-net com- pounds, Physical Review B105, 224103 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    W. Zhao, M. Yang, X. Du, Y. Li, K. Zhai, Y. Hu, J. Han, Y. Huang, Z. Liu, Y. Yao,et al., Topological phase tran- sition in quasi-one-dimensional bismuth iodide bi4i4, npj Quantum Materials9, 103 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo,et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantumsimulations of materials, Journal of physics: Condensed matter21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni,et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso, Journal of physics: Condensed matter29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical review let- ters77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  32. [40]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Physical review B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  33. [41]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, wannier90: A tool for ob- taining maximally-localised wannier functions, Computer physics communications178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Reviews of modern physics82, 1959 (2010)

    1959

  35. [43]

    S. S. Tsirkin, High performance wannier interpolation of berry curvature and related quantities with wannierberri code, npj Computational Materials7, 33 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Liu, J.-J

    C.-C. Liu, J.-J. Zhou, Y. Yao, and F. Zhang, Weak topo- logical insulators and composite weyl semimetals:β-bi 4 x 4 (x= br, i), Physical review letters116, 066801 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Noguchi, T

    R. Noguchi, T. Takahashi, K. Kuroda, M. Ochi, T. Shi- rasawa, M. Sakano, C. Bareille, M. Nakayama, M. Wat- son, K. Yaji,et al., A weak topological insulator state in quasi-one-dimensional bismuth iodide, Nature566, 518 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Y. A. Bychkov and ´E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2d elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP lett39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  39. [47]

    See supplementary material for results on monolayer structures

  40. [48]

    Aut` es, A

    G. Aut` es, A. Isaeva, L. Moreschini, J. C. Johannsen, A. Pisoni, R. Mori, W. Zhang, T. G. Filatova, A. N. Kuznetsov, L. Forr´ o,et al., A novel quasi-one- dimensional topological insulator in bismuth iodideβ- bi4i4, Nature materials15, 154 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insulators, Reviews of modern physics82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.