Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 52 references

From diffusion to transmission via EDP-convergence: a paradigmatic multiscale limit

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A multiscale diffusion limit yields a unique membrane kinetic relation that inherits free energy and mobility from the microscale.

desk verdict First rigorous EDP-convergence for the membrane limit, cleanly recovering Marcelin–De Donder kinetics from Otto’s quadratic structure under stated power-law assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11478 v1 pith:JWA3HVTR submitted 2026-07-13 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Thomas Frenzel , Alexander Mielke This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 35K5535B2749J4582C24
keywords EDP-convergencegradientsystemsmembranetransmissionnonlineardiffusionMarcelin-DeDonderkineticsnon-equilibriumsteadystatesmultiscalelimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nonlinear diffusion on an interval with a thin layer of vanishing diffusivity converges, as a gradient system, to a membrane transmission problem. The paper does not merely recover the known limiting PDE; it proves EDP-convergence of the free-energy and dissipation potentials, which uniquely identifies an effective membrane dissipation potential. That potential encodes a kinetic relation between the jump of chemical potential and the flux through the membrane. Microscopic properties of the free-energy density and the mobility migrate into this kinetic relation: starting from Otto's linear Onsager structure for linear diffusion one obtains the classical exponential Marcelin–De Donder kinetics. The result shows that, under scale separation, energetics and kinetics mix on the microscale and reappear as a non-quadratic effective kinetic law on the macroscale.

What carries the argument

EDP-convergence of the dissipation functionals D_ε (equivalently their rescaled versions bD_ε) together with the cell problem that defines the membrane potential M(v_-,v_+,κ) by minimizing the local flux-and-slope integrand subject to fixed boundary densities; the reduction theory of BER functions then identifies R_mb and its dual from M.

What would settle it

Construct a recovery sequence for a free-energy/mobility pair that violates the stronger concavity condition (2.11) but satisfies the weaker homeomorphism condition (2.12), and check whether the limsup inequality for bD_ε still holds; failure would show the technical restriction is essential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under stated growth and concavity assumptions on free energy E and mobility m, the family of gradient systems for the thin-layer diffusion problem EDP-converges to a limiting gradient system whose dual dissipation consists of the usual bulk terms plus a membrane potential R_mb given by a cell problem that minimizes a quadratic flux-plus-slope functional over density profiles connecting the two sides of the membrane. For power-law mobility and Boltzmann entropy this R_mb recovers Marcelin–De Donder exponential kinetics.

Load-bearing premise

Both the mobility and a related second-derivative expression built from the free energy must be concave; this is used to keep the dissipation functionals convex so that recovery sequences can be built by temporal averaging.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The effective kinetic relation for the membrane is uniquely determined by EDP-convergence and generally non-quadratic even when every microscopic dissipation is quadratic.
  • Microscopic free-energy properties (e.g., logarithmic Boltzmann statistics) reappear as exponential growth of the macroscopic kinetic relation.
  • For power-law mobility m(v)=v^β and energy exponent p the membrane potential depends on β and p separately, while the transmission condition of the PDE depends only on the product α=β+p-1.
  • The same cell-problem construction supplies the kinetic relation for any free energy and mobility satisfying the stated growth and concavity assumptions, not merely power laws.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same EDP-plus-cell-problem strategy should produce effective jump kinetics for thin absorbing or reacting layers once the reaction term is included in the dissipation potential.
  • In higher dimensions the membrane cell problem decouples pointwise on the surface, suggesting that the one-dimensional kinetic relation carries over locally after localization.
  • Quadratic membrane potentials obtained by ad-hoc fitting are physically justified only when the microscopic mobility is constant; otherwise the exponential or power-law forms derived here are the consistent choices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies EDP-convergence of Otto-type gradient structures for nonlinear diffusion on an interval whose mobility is scaled by ε in a thin central layer, so that the PDE limit is a membrane transmission problem. Under assumptions (2.10) and the concavity conditions (2.11)/(2.12) on free energy E and mobility m, the dissipation functionals D_ε Γ-converge (conditioned on bounded energy) to a limit D_0 whose dual dissipation R_eff consists of the bulk Otto terms plus a membrane potential R_mb defined by the cell problem (1.8). The effective kinetic relation is uniquely extracted from this Γ-limit; for power-law mobility and Boltzmann entropy it recovers the Marcelin–De Donder form. The argument proceeds by rescaling the layer, obtaining a priori estimates and compactness (Prop. 3.4), a liminf via convexification and measure-theoretic lower semicontinuity (Props. 4.1–4.2), a recovery sequence under the stronger concavity (2.11) (§5), and identification of R_mb via NESS/BER reduction (§6).

Significance. The work supplies a rigorous, uniquely determined effective gradient structure for a paradigmatic multiscale membrane limit, going beyond mere PDE convergence. The migration of microscopic energetics into a non-quadratic (even exponential) membrane kinetic relation is a clean illustration of the power of EDP-convergence and of the NESS/BER calculus. Explicit formulae for power-law structures, including the recovery of Marcelin–De Donder kinetics from Otto’s linear Onsager structure, are of independent interest for reaction-diffusion and large-deviation modelling. The technical machinery (scaled continuity equation, convexification for the membrane liminf, recovery under Jensen) is carefully developed and should be reusable for related singular limits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Thm. 2.6(B), §5, condition (2.11)] The full EDP-convergence statement (Thm. 2.3 / Cor. 2.4) relies on the stronger concavity (2.11) solely for the Γ-limsup recovery sequence in Thm. 2.6(B) and §5 (Jensen + temporal mollification). The authors themselves flag (2.11) as technical and conjecture that the weaker homeomorphism condition (2.12) already used for the liminf suffices. Either a sketch of how the recovery can be adapted under (2.12), or an explicit restriction of the main theorem to the range where (2.11) holds (e.g. the parallelogram of Prop. 2.2), would make the load-bearing hypothesis transparent.
  2. [Cor. 2.7, inequality (2.29)] Corollary 2.7 (convergence of EDB solutions) assumes the chain-rule inequality (2.29) for the limiting system without proof. The authors note that convexity of E and D_0 should allow temporal smoothing, but the argument is left open. Since the corollary is presented as a consequence of EDP-convergence, either a short proof (or reference to a forthcoming companion) or a clear statement that (2.29) is an additional hypothesis would remove the remaining gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2.1, Prop. 2.2] Figure 2.1 and the statement of Prop. 2.2 would be clearer if the closed parallelogram corresponding to (2.11) were drawn explicitly and the boundary cases β=0,1 and 2p+β=3,4 were labelled.
  2. [§2.2] The notation switch between unscaled (v,J,D) and scaled (u,Q,bD) quantities is generally careful, but a short table or a sentence at the beginning of §2.2 listing the principal correspondences would help the reader.
  3. [Eq. (1.11)] In (1.11) and later appearances of C and C^*, a brief reminder that C is the Legendre transform of the cosh-type function C^* would avoid hunting through the text.
  4. [Introduction, passim] A few typographical slips remain (e.g. “let to the beautiful connections”, “At first sight.” with a period, occasional missing spaces around ±). A final copy-edit pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective membrane potential is uniquely extracted from a self-contained Γ-limit of dissipation functionals under stated assumptions on E and m; self-citations supply technical tools (EDP definition, NESS/BER reduction) rather than the target result.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2.4 (definition of EDP-convergence) and Corollary 2.4; also Section 6.1–6.2 (BER reduction)]
    "The simplest form of EDP-convergence of the family (Q,E_ε,R_ε) to the limiting gradient system (Q,E_0,R_eff) is defined via the Γ-convergence E_ε Γ⇀ E_0 on Q and D_ε ΓE⇀ D_0 on L1([0,T];Q) and D_0 is defined via E_0 and R_eff as in (1.6), see [DFM19, MMP21] for precise definitions. ... We emphasize that ... the effective dissipation potential is uniquely determined by this procedure"

    The uniqueness claim for R_eff is imported from the authors' own prior definition of EDP-convergence. This is only mildly load-bearing: the paper still proves the concrete Γ-limit of D_ε independently, so the citation supplies the abstract uniqueness wrapper rather than the content of R_mb itself. Score contribution is therefore minimal (1).

full rationale

The paper's central claim is the EDP-convergence (P(D),E,R_ε) → (P(D),E,R_eff) of Theorem 2.3 / Corollary 2.4, with R_eff uniquely determined by the Γ-limit D_0 of the dissipation functionals (explicitly via the bulk integrals plus the cell-problem functional M of (1.8)/(2.26)). The Γ-liminf (Props. 4.1–4.2) and Γ-limsup (Section 5, under the stronger concavity (2.11)) are proved from first principles via a priori estimates, weak* lower semi-continuity after convexification by ψ, and recovery sequences using Jensen on the convex functional; no parameters are fitted and no external data enter. The identification that D_0 = ∫(R_eff + R*_eff) (and the explicit dual pair R_mb, R*_mb) uses the authors' prior NESS/BER theory (Section 6, citing [Mie23b, Mie25]), but this is an interpretive reduction of an already-established Γ-limit, not a load-bearing premise that forces the form of R_mb. Explicit formulae for power-law cases (including Marcelin–De Donder for p=1) are direct calculations from the cell problem (Section 6.4–6.5). Self-citations to the EDP framework ([LM*17, DFM19, MMP21]) define the notion of convergence but do not substitute for the proofs of the liminf/limsup. The unproved chain-rule (2.29) affects only the optional solution-convergence Corollary 2.7. No self-definitional loop, fitted-input-as-prediction, or ansatz-smuggling appears; the derivation is self-contained against its own hypotheses.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Pure-analysis paper; no free parameters fitted to data. Load-bearing ingredients are standard functional-analytic assumptions plus two paper-specific structural conditions on E and m that guarantee convexity or allow convexification.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption E strictly convex, superlinear, C^{2} on (0,∞) with growth E(u) ≥ c_E u^{q_E} – 1/c_E; m continuous, positive for u>0; integrability of √m E'' near 0 (assumptions (2.10))
    Standard for free-energy/mobility pairs that generate nonlinear diffusion; invoked throughout Sections 2–5 to obtain energy and slope bounds.
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of a homeomorphism ψ such that n_ψ = m∘ψ and g_ψ are concave and w ≤ C(1+H(ψ(w)))^{2} (condition (2.12))
    Technical device allowing convexification of the membrane dissipation for the Γ-liminf; weaker than (2.11) but still restrictive.
  • ad hoc to paper Both m and g_id = (E'')^{2}/m are concave (condition (2.11))
    Used for Jensen’s inequality in the recovery-sequence construction (Section 5); authors conjecture it is removable.
  • domain assumption Chain-rule inequality for the limiting dissipation functional D_0 (assumed for Corollary 2.7)
    Standard technical hypothesis in EDP theory guaranteeing that energy-dissipation balance solutions converge to solutions; expected to hold by convexity but not proved here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From diffusion to transmission via EDP-convergence: a paradigmatic multiscale limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JWA3HVTR

@misc{pith2026260711478,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From diffusion to transmission via EDP-convergence: a paradigmatic multiscale limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JWA3HVTR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11478}
}
read the original abstract

We consider nonlinear diffusion equations on an interval where the diffusion coefficient in a small region near the center is scaled such that it approximates a transmission condition at a membrane. While the limiting behavior of the solutions is well-understood, we study the convergence in the sense of the energy-dissipation principle (EDP) of associated gradient structures given in terms of a free energy and a dissipation potential. EDP-convergence provides a uniquely specified limiting gradient structure that reformulates the transmission condition in terms of an effective kinetic relation for the membrane, which relates the jump of the chemical potential and the flux through the membrane. We show how \AAA properties of the chosen free energy and the mobility of small-scale diffusion migrate to the effective kinetic relation. A surprising result is that starting from the linear Onsager relation of Otto's gradient structure for the linear diffusion equation, one obtains an exponentially growing kinetic relation, the so-called Marcelin-De Donder kinetic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11478 by the authors.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. In the (β, p) plane for the mobility m(v) = v β and the free energy E = Ep we indicate several regions where the analysis of the porous medium equation was developed. For details see the main text. We call the triple (M, E, g) a gradient structure for the equation and will use the notation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. The different regimes for m(u) = u β and E ′′ p (u) = u p−2 leading to the equation u˙ = ∂x [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    urich, Birkh\

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar \'e , Gradient flows in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures, Lectures in Mathematics ETH Z\"urich, Birkh\"auser Verlag, Basel, 2005

    2005

  2. [2]

    Arnrich, A

    S. Arnrich, A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, G. Savar\'e, and M. Veneroni: Passing to the limit in a W asserstein gradient flow: from diffusion to reaction . Calc. Var. Part. Diff. Eqns. 44 (2012) 419--454

    2012

  3. [3]

    Benamou and Y

    J.-D. Benamou and Y. Brenier: A computational fluid mechanics solution to the M onge- K antorovich mass transfer problem . Numer. Math. 84:3 (2000) 375--393

    2000

  4. [4]

    Bodineau and B

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida: Current fluctuations in non-equilibrium diffusive systems: an additivity principle. Phys. Review Letters 92:18 (2004) 1--4, Revision 30 Oct 2018 arXiv:0402305v1

    2004

  5. [5]

    H. Br \'e zis, Monotonicity methods in Hilbert spaces and some applications to nonlinear partial differential equations , Contribution to Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Madison, 1971, Proc. Sympos. Univ.\ Wisconsin , pp. 101--156

    1971

  6. [6]

    E. A. Carlen and J. Maas: An analog of the 2- W asserstein metric in non-commutative probability under which the Fermionic Fokker-Planck equation is gradient flow for the entropy . Commun. Math. Phys. 331:3 (2014) 887--926

    2014

  7. [7]

    : Gradient flow and entropy inequalities for quantum Markov semigroups with detailed balance . J. Funct. Analysis 273:5 (2017) 1810--1869

    2017

  8. [8]

    Ciavolella, N

    G. Ciavolella, N. David, and A. Poulain: Effective interface conditions for a porous medium type problem. Interfaces Free Bound. 26:2 (2024) 161--188

    2024

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    M. A. J. Chaplain, C. Giverso, T. Lorenzi, and L. Preziosi: Derivation and application of effective interface conditions for continuum mechanical models of cell invasion through thin membranes. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 79:5 (2019) 2011--2031

    2019

  2. [10]

    S.-N. Chow, W. Huang, Y. Li, and H. Zhou: Fokker- P lanck equations for a free energy functional or M arkov process on a graph . Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 203:3 (2012) 969--1008

    2012

  3. [11]

    Dembo and O

    A. Dembo and O. Zeitouni, Large deviations techniques and applications, 2 ed., Springer, New York, 1987

    1987

  4. [12]

    Dondl, T

    P. Dondl, T. Frenzel, and A. Mielke: A gradient system with a wiggly energy and relaxed EDP -convergence . ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 25 (2019) 68/1--45

    2019

  5. [13]

    Erbar and J

    M. Erbar and J. Maas: Gradient flow structures for discrete porous medium equations. Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. A 34:4 (2014) 1355--1374

    2014

  6. [14]

    Fehrman and B

    B. Fehrman and B. Gess: Non-equilibrium large deviations and parabolic-hyperbolic PDE with irregular drift . Invent. Math. 234:2 (2023) 573--636

    2023

  7. [15]

    Feinberg: On chemical kinetics of a certain class

    M. Feinberg: On chemical kinetics of a certain class. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 46 (1972) 1--41

    1972

  8. [16]

    Fonseca and G

    I. Fonseca and G. Leoni, Modern methods in the calculus of variations: L^p spaces , Springer, 2007

    2007

  9. [17]

    at zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakult\

    T. Frenzel, On the derivation of effective gradient systems via EDP -convergence , Ph.D. thesis, Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakult\"at, 2019, doi 10.18452/21391

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Frenzel and M

    T. Frenzel and M. Liero: Effective diffusion in thin structures via generalized gradient systems and EDP -convergence . Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. S 14:1 (2021) 395--425

    2021

  11. [19]

    Gess and D

    B. Gess and D. Heydecker: The porous medium equation: large deviations and gradient flow with degenerate and unbounded diffusion. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    Glitzky and A

    A. Glitzky and A. Mielke: A gradient structure for systems coupling reaction-diffusion effects in bulk and interfaces. Z. angew. Math. Phys. (ZAMP) 64 (2013) 29--52

    2013

  13. [21]

    M. Gahn, M. Neuss-Radu , and P. Knabner: Derivation of effective transmission conditions for domains separated by a membrane for different scaling of membrane diffusivity. Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. S 10:4 (2017) 773--797

    2017

  14. [22]

    Grmela: Multiscale equilibrium and nonequilibrium thermodynamics in chemical engineering

    M. Grmela: Multiscale equilibrium and nonequilibrium thermodynamics in chemical engineering. Adv. Chem. Eng. 39 (2010) 75--128

    2010

  15. [23]

    Heinze, A

    G. Heinze, A. Mielke, and A. Stephan: Discrete-to-continuum limit for nonlinear reaction-diffusion systems via EDP convergence for gradient systems . Submitted (2025) , WIAS Preprint 3194, arXiv:2504.06837

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Heinze, J.-F

    G. Heinze, J.-F. Pietschmann, and A. Schlichting: Gradient flows on metric graphs with reservoirs: Microscopic derivation and multiscale limits. Preprint (2024) , arXiv:2412.16775

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Jordan, D

    R. Jordan, D. Kinderlehrer, and F. Otto: The variational formulation of the F okker- P lanck equation . SIAM J. Math. Analysis 29:1 (1998) 1--17

    1998

  18. [26]

    L \'e onard: Large deviations for long range interacting particle systems with jumps

    C. L \'e onard: Large deviations for long range interacting particle systems with jumps. Annalles Inst. H. Poincar\'e sec.\,B 31:2 (1995) 289--323

    1995

  19. [27]

    Liero, A

    M. Liero, A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and D. R. M. Renger: On microscopic origins of generalized gradient structures. Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. S 10:1 (2017) 1--35

    2017

  20. [28]

    Maas: Gradient flows of the entropy for finite M arkov chains

    J. Maas: Gradient flows of the entropy for finite M arkov chains . J. Funct. Anal. 261 (2011) 2250--2292

    2011

  21. [29]

    Marcelin: Contribution a l'\'etude de la cin\'etique physico-chimique

    R. Marcelin: Contribution a l'\'etude de la cin\'etique physico-chimique. Annales de Physique III (1915) 120--231

    1915

  22. [30]

    Mielke: A gradient structure for reaction-diffusion systems and for energy-drift-diffusion systems

    A. Mielke: A gradient structure for reaction-diffusion systems and for energy-drift-diffusion systems. Nonlinearity 24 (2011) 1329--1346

    2011

  23. [31]

    : Geodesic convexity of the relative entropy in reversible Markov chains . Calc. Var. Part. Diff. Eqns. 48:1 (2013) 1--31

    2013

  24. [32]

    : Thermomechanical modeling of energy-reaction-diffusion systems, including bulk-interface interactions. Discr. Cont. Dynam. Systems Ser. S 6:2 (2013) 479--499

    2013

  25. [33]

    Muntean, J

    , On evolutionary -convergence for gradient systems (Ch.\,3) , Macroscopic and Large Scale Phenomena: Coarse Graining, Mean Field Limits and Ergodicity (A. Muntean, J. Rademacher, and A. Zagaris, eds.), Lecture Notes in Applied Math. Mechanics Vol.\,3, Springer, 2016, Proc. of...

    2016

  26. [34]

    , An introduction to the analysis of gradient systems, WIAS Preprint 3022, arXiv:2306.05026, 2023, (Script of a lecture course 2022/23, 100\,pp.)

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    : Non-equilibrium steady states as saddle points and EDP -convergence for slow-fast gradient systems . J. Math. Physics 64:123502 (2023) 1--27

    2023

  28. [36]

    In preparation (2025)

    : Port gradient systems, non-equilibrium steady states, and Prigogine 's principle of minimal dissipation . In preparation (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Mittnenzweig and A

    M. Mittnenzweig and A. Mielke: An entropic gradient structure for Lindblad equations and couplings of quantum systems to macroscopic models . J. Stat. Physics 167:2 (2017) 205--233

    2017

  30. [38]

    Mielke and J

    A. Mielke and J. Naumann: On the existence of global-in-time weak solutions and scaling laws for Kolmogorov 's two-equation model of turbulence . Z.\ angew.\ Math.\ Mech. (ZAMM) 102:9 (2022) e202000019/1--31

    2022

  31. [39]

    Mielke, A

    A. Mielke, A. Montefusco, and M. A. Peletier: Exploring families of energy-dissipation landscapes via tilting --- three types of EDP convergence . Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 33 (2021) 611--637

    2021

  32. [40]

    Matthes, A

    D. Matthes, A. Mielke, and J. Zimmer: A new approach to the chain rule for some doubly-nonlinear diffusion equations with p -Laplacian . In preparation (2026)

    2026

  33. [41]

    Moussa: Some variants of the classical Aubin--Lions lemma

    A. Moussa: Some variants of the classical Aubin--Lions lemma . J. Evol. Eqns. 16:1 (2016) 65--93

    2016

  34. [42]

    Mielke, R

    A. Mielke, R. I. A. Patterson, M. A. Peletier, and D. R. M. Renger: Non-equilibrium thermodynamical principles for chemical reactions with mass-action kinetics. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 77:4 (2017) 1562--1585

    2017

  35. [43]

    Mielke, M

    A. Mielke, M. A. Peletier, and A. Stephan: EDP -convergence for nonlinear fast-slow reaction systems with detailed balance . Nonlinearity 34:8 (2021) 5762--5798

    2021

  36. [44]

    Mielke, A

    A. Mielke, A. Schlichting, and A. Stephan: Derivation of the fourth-order DLSS equation with nonlinear mobility via chemical reactions . Submitted (2025) , arXiv:2510.07149, WIAS Preprint 3221

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Neuss-Radu and W

    M. Neuss-Radu and W. J \"a ger: Effective transmission conditions for reaction-diffusion processes in domains separated by an interface. SIAM J. Math. Analysis 39:3 (2007) 687--720

    2007

  38. [46]

    Otto, Double degenerate diffusion equations as steepest descent, Preprint no.\ 480, SFB 256, University of Bonn, 1996

    F. Otto, Double degenerate diffusion equations as steepest descent, Preprint no.\ 480, SFB 256, University of Bonn, 1996

    1996

  39. [47]

    : The geometry of dissipative evolution equations: the porous medium equation. Comm. Partial Diff. Eqns. 26 (2001) 101--174

    2001

  40. [48]

    M. A. Peletier and A. Schlichting: Cosh gradient systems and tilting. Nonlinear Analysis 231:113094 (2023) 1--113

    2023

  41. [49]

    M. A. Peletier, F. Redig, and K. Vafayi: Large deviations in stochastic heat-conduction processes provide a gradient-flow structure for heat conduction. J. Math. Physics 55 (2014) 093301/19

    2014

  42. [50]

    Rossi and G

    R. Rossi and G. Savar\'e: Tightness, integral equicontinuity and compactness for evolution problems in Banach spaces . Ann. Scoula Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci (5) 2:2 (2003) 395--431

    2003

  43. [51]

    Sandier and S

    E. Sandier and S. Serfaty: Gamma-convergence of gradient flows with applications to G inzburg- L andau . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. LVII (2004) 1627--1672

    2004

  44. [52]

    Stephan: EDP-convergence for a linear reaction-diffusion system with fast reversible reaction

    A. Stephan: EDP-convergence for a linear reaction-diffusion system with fast reversible reaction . Calc. Var. Part. Diff. Eqns. 60:6 (2021) 226/35\,pp

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.