Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 136 references

Hygroscopic hysteresis drives intermittent salt creeping

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Pith's one-line read Hygroscopic hysteresis is the switch that turns steady evaporation into intermittent salt creeping.

desk verdict Solid experiment-plus-minimal-model paper: hysteresis between deliquescence and efflorescence is the switch for intermittent salt creeping; calibration of ϕeff is the only real soft spot, and it is standard. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.11587 v1 pith:T76L5J47 submitted 2026-07-13 cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn

classification cond-mat.softphysics.flu-dyn
keywords saltcreepinghygroscopichysteresisdeliquescenceefflorescencerelaxationoscillatorconfinedevaporationimbibitionfeedbackcapillary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Salt creeping is the precipitation of crystals that climb away from an evaporating liquid interface along solid surfaces. This paper shows, through capillary experiments that vary salt concentration and ambient humidity, that the process is not always smooth: under many conditions the liquid meniscus advances in abrupt steps while liquid episodically soaks into the growing salt crust. A minimal model that couples one-dimensional transport inside the capillary to the known hysteresis between salt deliquescence and efflorescence reproduces those steps. The hysteresis acts as a threshold switch that loads and discharges the system, so salt creeping behaves as a relaxation oscillator. The result matters because the same intermittent pathway can drive damage in stone and heritage materials, fouling in desalination and CO2 injection, and deposition patterns in printing, and it suggests that hysteretic phase change is a generic route to intermittency whenever multicomponent fluids evaporate under confinement.

What carries the argument

Hygroscopic relaxation oscillator: one-dimensional advection-diffusion of salt in the liquid column, coupled to a hysteretic evolution of the active wicking area of the outer salt crust that switches between growth and dissolution when the exit concentration crosses fixed efflorescence and deliquescence thresholds.

What would settle it

Repeat the capillary experiments with a salt that has a measured deliquescence-efflorescence window, or with deliberately altered nucleation density (roughened exit), and check whether the meniscus steps and concentration oscillations disappear exactly when the hysteresis window collapses or the thresholds are crossed only once.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Hysteresis between the efflorescence and deliquescence concentrations of a hygroscopic salt is sufficient to generate oscillatory salt accumulation at a capillary exit and intermittent meniscus dynamics. In unidirectional evaporation of aqueous NaCl, episodic imbibition into the outer salt crust creates a feedback loop; the hysteresis window periodically activates and suppresses that loop, turning otherwise steady evaporation into step-like creeping that can be captured by a minimal advection-diffusion model with a two-state growth-dissolution switch.

Load-bearing premise

The model treats the crust's active surface as switching growth and dissolution at fixed concentration thresholds with simple first-order kinetics, so the oscillations stand or fall with that relay description of the salt deposit.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies unidirectional evaporation of aqueous NaCl from a glass capillary and shows that salt creeping on the outer surface can produce intermittent, step-like recession of the top meniscus. By varying initial salt mass fraction φ0 and ambient relative humidity Hr, the authors map smooth, intermittent, and late self-amplifying regimes. Optical greyscale tracking correlates meniscus jumps with episodic liquid imbibition into the porous deposit; roughening the capillary base to enhance nucleation quenches axial creeping and intermittency. A minimal 1D advection–diffusion model for salt transport, coupled to a hysteretic two-state evolution of the active wicking area Awick between fixed deliquescence and efflorescence thresholds (Eqs. 1–6), reproduces the three dynamical regimes and frames salt creeping as a hygroscopic relaxation oscillator.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable mechanism for a long-standing qualitative puzzle: why salt creeping is sometimes smooth and sometimes violently intermittent. The experimental map in (φ0, Hr), the greyscale–meniscus correlation (Fig. 3A), and the nucleation-quench control (Fig. 3D) are strong and reproducible soft-matter evidence. The model is transparent, recovers the smooth regime essentially from material properties alone, and places confined salt creeping in the same dynamical class as other relaxation oscillators. That framing is useful for cultural-heritage weathering, CO2 sequestration, and inkjet fouling, and the SI CNT variant shows the intermittency mechanism is robust when efflorescence is treated as kinetic rather than fixed-threshold.

major comments (2)
  1. Eq. (6) and the associated calibration (φeff = 0.320, δv = 1 mm, δeff = δdel = 0.9 µm): the quantitative match to intermittent step timing and inter-event period (Fig. S1B) is obtained by fitting these parameters to the φ0 = 0.20, Hr = 0.10 case. The smooth-regime recession is essentially parameter-free, but the claim that hysteresis is 'sufficient' to generate the observed intermittency is only partly predictive for the intermittent regime. The manuscript should state more explicitly which observables are true predictions versus post-calibration reproductions, and ideally show at least one additional (φ0, Hr) intermittent point predicted without re-fitting.
  2. Results / SI (nucleation-limited efflorescence): the main-text model treats φeff as a fixed, deposit-assisted threshold, while the SI CNT variant produces higher, drying-rate-dependent thresholds and tends not to sustain multi-cycle intermittency. The physical distinction between pristine and heterogeneously assisted nucleation is important for the regime map. The main text should clarify more sharply when the fixed-threshold relay is appropriate and how the nucleation-control experiment (Fig. 3D) maps onto a change in effective φeff or J0, so that the sufficiency claim does not rest on an under-specified threshold.
minor comments (4)
  1. Figure 4 and the non-dimensionalization: the definitions of LD and TD are given, but a short table of the numerical values used for D, Dv, csat, χ(φ), and the microscopic lengths would make the SI and main-text comparisons easier to reproduce.
  2. Abstract and Conclusions: the phrase 'intrinsically intermittent' is slightly stronger than the regime map, which also shows continuous creeping and smooth recession. Softening to 'can be intrinsically intermittent' would align better with Figs. 1–2.
  3. Materials and Methods: the humidity-chamber tolerances (±0.03) and the 40 s imaging interval are stated; a brief note on how greyscale intensity is spatially averaged (ROI size, background subtraction) would help readers interpret Fig. 3A.
  4. References: a few recent capillary and porous-media salt-creeping works are cited; ensuring the self-similarity preprint (Wijnhorst et al., arXiv:2508.18779) is discussed in relation to the intermittent vs continuous distinction would strengthen the literature placement.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Intermittent step timings and periods are recovered only after calibrating ϕeff and the microscopic δ scales to the same ϕ0=0.20, Hr=0.10 data; the hysteresis-sufficiency claim itself is not forced by definition and rests on independent experimental correlations.

  1. fitted input called prediction [SI ‘Numerical procedure and model calibration’; main-text comparison to Fig. 1C / S1B]
    "the hygroscopic hysteresis parameters (δv = 1 mm, δeff = δdel = 0.9 µm, and ϕeff = 0.320), which are calibrated against three independent experimental measurements for the ϕ0 = 0.20, Hr = 0.10 case. With these values, the model predictions agree reasonably well with the experimental measurements (figures S1B and S1C). … the model reproduces … for ϕ0 = 0.20, Hr = 0.10 — the mean inter-event period and the individual step timings"

    ϕeff and the three microscopic lengths are adjusted so that the model’s loading–burst–reset cycle matches the observed step timings and inter-event period of the identical data set. The subsequent claim that the model ‘reproduces’ those timings is therefore statistically forced by the calibration rather than an out-of-sample prediction.

  2. fitted input called prediction [SI paragraph on elevated-humidity case (Fig. S1C)]
    "a pristine crystal eventually nucleates — a slow stochastic event represented by seeding a crust at the experimentally-observed nucleation time (t ≈ 87640 s, figure S1C). The seeded crust thereafter only grows … producing the observed monotonic self-amplification."

    The nucleation instant that initiates the self-amplifying branch is taken directly from the experiment being ‘predicted’; once seeded, growth is automatic because ϕ|z=0 already exceeds ϕdel. The late-time acceleration is therefore partly an input rather than an independent forecast.

full rationale

The paper’s central sufficiency argument—that deliquescence–efflorescence hysteresis is enough to turn steady confined evaporation into intermittent creeping—is demonstrated by a transparent minimal model (1-D advection–diffusion coupled to a two-state hysteretic Awick relay, Eqs. 1–6) that produces oscillations of ϕ|z=0 between ϕdel and ϕeff precisely when the experimental regimes are intermittent. Smooth-regime recession is recovered with literature material parameters alone and no free fit. However, quantitative reproduction of the intermittent regime (mean inter-event period, individual step timings, and amplitudes in Fig. S1B) requires calibrating ϕeff = 0.320 together with δv, δeff, δdel against the very same ϕ0 = 0.20, Hr = 0.10 data set; the high-humidity self-amplifying case further seeds the crust at the experimentally observed nucleation time. These quantitative “predictions” are therefore partly forced by the fit. The mechanism is not circular by construction: greyscale–meniscus correlations (Fig. 3A), the nucleation-quench control (Fig. 3D), and the CNT variant that makes ϕeff emergent all supply independent experimental and theoretical support. No self-citation chain or definitional identity underpins the claim. The circularity is therefore limited to the usual soft-matter practice of calibrating a few microscopic scales and then matching the calibrated case, meriting a moderate score of 4 rather than a higher one.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard 1D confined-evaporation transport plus a paper-specific hysteretic relay for wicking area. A few microscopic lengths and the efflorescence threshold are free parameters calibrated to the intermittent case; deliquescence is taken near saturation from literature. No new particles or forces are invented—the ‘relaxation oscillator’ is a dynamical-systems framing of the same equations.

free parameters (3)
  • ϕeff (efflorescence threshold) = 0.320
    Fixed at 0.320 for the main-text relay model; calibrated so that exit concentration oscillates and step timings match the ϕ0=0.20, Hr=0.10 experiment. Physically nucleation-controlled and not a pure thermodynamic constant.
  • δv (effective vapor diffusion length for wick) = 1 mm
    Sets magnitude of Jwick; chosen as 1 mm among order-of-magnitude estimates and used in intermittent/self-amplifying calibration.
  • δeff, δdel (growth/dissolution microscopic lengths) = 0.9 µm each
    Single material scales in first-order Awick kinetics; set equal to 0.9 µm and calibrated with ϕeff against intermittent data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Constant solution density ρ and diffusivity D equal to the initial-composition values; 1D advection–diffusion describes ϕ(z,t) in a semi-infinite column.
    Stated in Results/model section and Materials; standard for prior unidirectional multicomponent capillary evaporation models (e.g. Thayyil Raju et al. 2024).
  • domain assumption Total water flux splits into pinned-meniscus evaporative flux (quasi-steady diffusion-limited) plus Fickian wick flux proportional to Awick(χ−Hr).
    Equations (2)–(5); extends standard meniscus evaporation by an imbibition pathway.
  • ad hoc to paper Awick evolves by first-order precipitation/dissolution kinetics with a two-state hysteretic switch between ϕeff and ϕdel (Eq. 6).
    Minimal relay encoding hygroscopic hysteresis; not derived from microscale crystal kinetics.
  • domain assumption ϕdel ≈ ϕsat = 0.267 for NaCl; salt rejected at the interface is carried entirely into the wicking flux.
    Literature hygroscopicity for NaCl and modeling closure for salt mass balance at z=0.
  • domain assumption Upper meniscus evaporation is negligible; bottom contact line remains pinned.
    Experimental protocol and model geometry (high humidity at top chamber).
invented entities (1)
  • Hygroscopic relaxation oscillator (two-state Awick relay coupled to 1D salt transport)
    purpose: Provide a minimal dynamical system in which hysteresis alone produces intermittent meniscus jumps and regime transitions.
    Not a new physical substance; a modeling construct. Independent support comes from greyscale–meniscus correlation and nucleation-control experiments, but the specific first-order kinetics and fixed ϕeff are paper-internal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hygroscopic hysteresis drives intermittent salt creeping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T76L5J47

@misc{pith2026260711587,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hygroscopic hysteresis drives intermittent salt creeping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T76L5J47}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.11587}
}
read the original abstract

Salt creeping -- the precipitation of salt crystals away from an evaporating liquid interface along surrounding surfaces -- occurs across settings from geology and cultural-heritage weathering to inkjet printing and carbon sequestration. Yet why its dynamics are sometimes smooth and sometimes violently intermittent has remained unexplained. Here we investigate the confined evaporation of salt solutions from a capillary with unidirectional water loss and show that salt creeping is an intrinsically intermittent, out-of-equilibrium process. By systematically varying the initial salt concentration and the ambient relative humidity, we identify regimes in which crystal deposition on the outer capillary surface goes hand in hand with non-monotonic, intermittent dynamics. Time-resolved measurements reveal that these intermittent dynamics are sustained by episodic water imbibition into the growing salt structures on the outer surface of the capillary, which sets up a self-amplifying feedback between evaporation and crystallization. Combining experiments with a minimal theoretical model, we demonstrate that hysteresis between deliquescence and efflorescence concentrations is sufficient to generate oscillatory salt accumulation and intermittent dynamics. Hygroscopic hysteresis, in other words, is the switch that turns steady evaporation into intermittent creeping. Our results recast salt creeping as a relaxation oscillator, and point to the hysteretic phase change as a generic route to intermittency in evaporating multicomponent fluids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.11587 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Salt creeping driven by unidirectional evaporation. A. Schematic of the experimental setup. Time-lapsed experimental snapshots at relative humidity Hr = 0.10 for initial salt concentration B.i. ϕ0 = 0.05, for which salt creeping is largely suppressed, and B.ii. ϕ0 = 0.20, showing pronounced salt creeping. C. Temporal evolution of the top-meniscus displacement y(t) for different initial salt concentrations, ϕ0, at Hr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relative humidity can control both salt creeping and intermittent dynamics. At Hr = 0.70, A.i. time-lapsed experimental snapshots at ϕ0 = 0.20 show salt creeping while B.i. the corresponding top-meniscus dynamics remain non-intermittent. In contrast, at ϕ0 = 0.05, A.ii. time-lapsed experimental snapshots reveal the onset of salt creeping, and B.ii. the top-meniscus dynamics display pronounced intermittency (only a s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Imbibition-mediated feedback and its morphological and nucleation control. At Hr = 0.10 and A.i. ϕ0 = 0.20, time-resolved measurements of the local greyscale intensity (solid line) exhibit pronounced transient dips that flag episodic water imbibition into the creeping salt; these events are temporally correlated with the step-like jumps in the top meniscus position y(t) (discrete markers). By comparison, A.ii. for ϕ… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hysteretic hygroscopic growth governs intermittent dynamics. A. Schematic of the geometry for the theoretical model, showing both the evaporation and imbibition pathways of mass loss from the capillary. Temporal evolution of B.i., C.i. the salt concentration at the cap…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    H. Y. Erbil. Evaporation of pure liquid sessile and spherical suspended drops: A review.Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 170:67–86, 2012

  2. [2]

    Lohse and X

    D. Lohse and X. Zhang. Physicochemical hydrodynamics of droplets out of equilibrium.Nat. Rev. Phys., 2:426–443, 2020

  3. [3]

    Bourouiba

    L. Bourouiba. The fluid dynamics of disease transmission.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 53:473–508, 2021

  4. [4]

    D. H. Morris, K. C. Yinda, A. Gamble, F. W. Rossine, Q. Huang, T. Bushmaker, R. J. Fischer, M. J. Matson, N. van Doremalen, P. J. Vieksland, L. C. Marr, V. J. Munster, and J. O. Lloyd-Smith. Mechanistic theory predicts the effects of temperature and humidity on inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other enveloped viruses.eLife, 10:e65902, 2021

  5. [5]

    Gelderblom, C

    H. Gelderblom, C. Diddens, and A. Marin. Evaporation-driven liquid flow in sessile droplets.Soft Matter, 18:8535–8553, 2022

  6. [6]

    D. Lohse. Fundamental fluid dynamic challenges in inkjet printing.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 54:349–382, 2022

  7. [7]

    Hooiveld, H

    E. Hooiveld, H. M. van der Kooij, M. Kisters, T. E. Kodger, J. Sprakel, and J. van der Gucht.In-situ and quantitative imaging of evaporation-induced stratification in binary suspensions.J. Colloid Interface Sci., 630:666–675, 2023

  8. [8]

    Hooiveld, L

    E. Hooiveld, L. Rijnders, B. van der Meer, J. van der Gucht, J. Sprakel, and H. M. van der Kooij. Self-stratification and phase separation in drying binary colloidal films.J. Colloid Interface Sci., 679:324–333, 2025

Show all 136 references
  1. [9]

    Haessig, M

    C. Haessig, M. Habibi, and U. Sen. Tunable self-emulsification via viscoelastic control of Marangoni- driven interfacial instabilities.Small Meth., 10:2500749, 2026

  2. [10]

    Martínez-Puig, C

    J. Martínez-Puig, C. de la TorreLuque, C. A. Nieto, P. I. Hoekstra, F. Usera, B. M. Jouve, A. de la Encina, T. Bartolomé, M. Sanz, F. Almazán, A. Oña, A Marin, and J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez. Viral transport in evaporating sessile model respiratory droplets.bioRxiv, 2025

  3. [11]

    K. A. Ganar, M. Nandy, P. Turbina, C. Chen, D. Suylen, E. Nihoul, E. L. Pascoe, S. van der Beelen, M. Plaum, L. van den Bos, C. J. M. Koenraadt, I. Dijkgraaf, and S. Deshpande. Phase separation and ageing of glycine-rich protein from tick adhesive.Nat. Chem., 17:186–197, 2025

  4. [12]

    Nandy, U

    M. Nandy, U. Ghosh, K. A. Ganar, H. Ippel, I. Dijkgraaf, and S. Deshpande. pH-Tunable material properties of glycine-rich condensates from tick bioadhesive.Adv. Funct. Mater ., 36:e15418, 2026

  5. [13]

    R. U. Cooke and I. J. Smalley . Salt weathering in deserts.Nature, 220:1226–1227, 1968

  6. [14]

    Rodriguez-Navarro and E

    C. Rodriguez-Navarro and E. Doehne. Salt weathering: influence of evaporation rate, supersatura- tion and crystallization pattern.Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 24:191–209, 1999

  7. [15]

    Rodriguez-Navarro, L

    C. Rodriguez-Navarro, L. Linares-Fernandez, E. Doehne, and E. Sebastian. Effects of ferrocyanide ions on NaCl crystallization in porous stone.J. Cryst. Growth, 243:503–516, 2002

  8. [16]

    K. Xu, C. Wang, Z. Li, S. Wu, and J. Wang. Salt mitigation strategies of solar-driven interfacial desalination.Adv. Funct. Mater ., 31:2007855, 2021

  9. [17]

    G. Liu, T. Chen, J. Xu, G. Yao, J. Xie, Y. Cheng, Z. Miao, and K. Wang. Salt-rejecting solar interfacial evaporation.Cell Rep. Phys. Sci., 2, 2021

  10. [18]

    Z. Yang, D. Li, Y. Zhu, X. Zhu, W. Yu, K. Yang, and B. Chen. Developing salt-rejecting evaporators for solar desalination: A critical review.Environ. Sci. T echnol., 58:8610–8630, 2024

  11. [19]

    C. Chen, Y. Kuang, and L. Hu. Challenges and opportunities for solar evaporation.Joule, 3:683–718, 2019

  12. [20]

    B. K. Purohit and V. S. Sistla. Inorganic salt hydrate for thermal energy storage application: A review.Energy Storage, 3:e212, 2021

  13. [21]

    K. Yang, M. Yang, H. Chen, S. Zheng, A. Khandelwal, R. D. Priestley , and Z. J. Ren. Interfacial solar evaporation transforms brine mineral recovery .Sci. Adv., 11:eadx3242, 2025

  14. [22]

    Marin, S

    A. Marin, S. Karpitschka, D. Noguera-Marín, M. A. Cabrerizo-Vílchez, M. Rossi, C. J. Kähler, and M. A. RodríguezValverde. Solutal Marangoni flow as the cause of ring stains from drying salty colloidal drops.Phys. Rev. Fluids, 4:041601, 2019

  15. [23]

    M. A. Bruning, L. Loeffen, and A. Marin. Particle monolayer assembly in evaporating salty colloidal droplets.Phys. Rev. Fluids, 5:083603, 2020

  16. [24]

    S. A. McBride, S. Atis, A. A. Pahlavan, and K. K. Varanasi. Crystal patterning from aqueous solutions 17 via solutal instabilities.ACS Appl. Mater . Interfaces, 2024

  17. [25]

    Martínez-Puig, G

    J. Martínez-Puig, G. D’Agostino, A. Oña, and J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez. On the role of water activity on the formation of a protein-rich coffee ring in an evaporating multicomponent drop. arXiv:2509.09315, 2025

  18. [26]

    Shin, M.-W

    B. Shin, M.-W. Moon, and H.-Y. Kim. Rings, igloos, and pebbles of salt formed by drying saline drops.Langmuir, 30:12837–12842, 2014

  19. [27]

    Seyfert, J

    C. Seyfert, J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D. Lohse, and A. Marin. Stability of respiratory-like droplets under evaporation.Phys. Rev. Fluids, 7:023603, 2022

  20. [28]

    Shahidzadeh-Bonn, S

    N. Shahidzadeh-Bonn, S. Rafaı¨, D. Bonn, and G. Wegdam. Salt crystallization during evaporation: impact of interfacial properties.Langmuir, 24:8599–8605, 2008

  21. [29]

    Shahidzadeh, M

    N. Shahidzadeh, M. F. L. Schut, J. Desarnaud, M. Prat, and D. Bonn. Salt stains from evaporating droplets.Sci. Rep., 5:10335, 2015

  22. [30]

    Mailleur, C

    A. Mailleur, C. Pirat, O. Pierre-Louis, and J. Colombani. Hollow rims from water drop evaporation on salt substrates.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:214501, 2018

  23. [31]

    S. A. McBride, S. Dash, and K. K. Varanasi. Evaporative crystallization in drops on superhydrophobic and liquid-impregnated surfaces.Langmuir, 34:12350–12358, 2018

  24. [32]

    S. A. McBride, S. Dash, S. Khan, and K. K. Varanasi. Evaporative crystallization of spirals.Langmuir, 35:10484–10490, 2019

  25. [33]

    Salim, P

    H. Salim, P. Kolpakov, D. Bonn, and N. Shahidzadeh. Self-lifting NaCl crystals.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 11:7388–7393, 2020

  26. [34]

    S. A. McBride, H.-L. Girard, and K. K. Varanasi. Crystal critters: Self-ejection of crystals from heated, superhydrophobic surfaces.Sci. Adv., 7:eabe6960, 2021

  27. [35]

    Kumar and S

    V. Kumar and S. Dash. Patterns during evaporative crystallization of a saline droplet.Langmuir, 38:10265–10273, 2022

  28. [36]

    Clément and J

    F. Clément and J. Leng. Evaporation of liquids and solutions in confined geometry.Langmuir, 20:6538–6541, 2004

  29. [37]

    L. A. Rijniers, H. P. Huinink, L. Pel, and K. Kopinga. Experimental evidence of crystallization pressure inside porous media.Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:075503, 2005

  30. [38]

    Desarnaud, D

    J. Desarnaud, D. Bonn, and N. Shahidzadeh. The pressure induced by salt crystallization in confinement.Sci. Rep., 6:30856, 2016

  31. [39]

    Kohler, L

    F. Kohler, L. Gagliardi, O. Pierre-Louis, and D. K. Dysthe. Cavity formation in confined growing crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:096101, 2018

  32. [40]

    Pierre-Louis, and D

    Felix Kohler, O. Pierre-Louis, and D. K. Dysthe. Crystal growth in confinement.Nat. Commun., 13:6990, 2022

  33. [41]

    Muller, R

    N. Muller, R. Qi, E. Mackie, K. Pruess, and M. J. Blunt. CO2 injection impairment due to halite precipitation.Energy Proc., 1:3507–3514, 2009

  34. [42]

    M. Kim, A. Sell, and D. Sinton. Aquifer-on-a-Chip: understanding pore-scale salt precipitation dynamics during CO2 sequestration.Lab Chip, 13:2508–2518, 2013

  35. [43]

    Osselin, A

    F. Osselin, A. Fabbri, T. Fen-Chong, P. Dangla, J.-M. Pereira, and A. Lassin. Stress from NaCl crystallisation by carbon dioxide injection in aquifers.Environ. Geotech., 2:280–291, 2014

  36. [44]

    R. Miri, R. van Noort, P. Aagaard, and H. Hellevang. New insights on the physics of salt precipitation during injection of CO2 into saline aquifers.Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, 43:10–21, 2015

  37. [45]

    A. O. Olufade and C. J. Simonson. Characterization of the evolution of crystallization fouling in membranes.ACS Omega, 3:17188–17198, 2018

  38. [46]

    Engarnevis, R

    A. Engarnevis, R. Huizing, S. Green, and S. Rogak. Fouling of composite water vapor transport membranes by aerosol nanoparticles.J. Membr . Sci., 614:118440, 2020

  39. [47]

    M. Rump, U. Sen, R. Jeurissen, H. Reinten, M. Versluis, D. Lohse, C. Diddens, and T. Segers. Selective evaporation at the nozzle exit in piezoacoustic inkjet printing.Phys. Rev. Appl., 19:054056, 2023

  40. [48]

    M. Rump, C. Diddens, U. Sen, M. Versluis, D. Lohse, and T. Segers. Role of surfactants on droplet formation in piezoacoustic inkjet printing across microsecond-to-second timescales.Phys. Rev. Appl., 23:024076, 2025

  41. [49]

    Naillon, P

    A. Naillon, P. Joseph, and M. Prat. Sodium chloride precipitation reaction coefficient from crystal- lization experiment in a microfluidic device.J. Cryst. Growth, 463:201–210, 2017. 18

  42. [50]

    M. G. Pitman and A. Läuchli. Global Impact of Salinity and Agricultural Ecosystems. InSalinity: Environment - Plants - Molecules. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004

  43. [51]

    R. U. Cooke. Salt weathering in deserts.Proc. Geol. Assoc., 92:1–16, 1981

  44. [52]

    S. M. Green, R. Machin, and M. S. Cresser. Long-term road salting effects on dispersion of organic matter from roadside soils into drainage water.Chem. Ecol., 24:221–231, 2008

  45. [53]

    V. N. L. Wong, R. C. Dalal, and R. S. B. Greene. Salinity and sodicity effects on respiration and microbial biomass of soil.Biol. Fertil. Soils, 44:943–953, 2008

  46. [54]

    Hird and M

    R. Hird and M. D. Bolton. Migration of sodium chloride in dry porous materials.Proc. R. Soc. A, 472:20150710, 2016

  47. [55]

    Goudie and H

    A. Goudie and H. Viles.Salt Weathering Hazards. John Wiley and Sons, 1997

  48. [56]

    C. Price. Salt damage in porous materials: a threat to the cultural heritage.Archaeol. Int., 1:47–48, 1997

  49. [57]

    A. E. Charola. Salts in the deterioration of porous materials: an overview.J. Am. Inst. Conserv., 39:327–343, 2000

  50. [58]

    Linnow, L

    K. Linnow, L. Halsberghe, and M. Steiger. Analysis of calcium acetate efflorescences formed on ceramic tiles in a museum environment.J. Cult. Heritage, 8:44–52, 2007

  51. [59]

    M. Steiger. Crystal growth in porous materials—I: The crystallization pressure of large crystals.J. Cryst. Growth, 282:455–469, 2005

  52. [60]

    Sghaier and M

    N. Sghaier and M. Prat. Effect of efflorescence formation on drying kinetics of porous media.Transp. Porous Med., 80:441–454, 2009

  53. [61]

    Shahidzadeh-Bonn, J

    N. Shahidzadeh-Bonn, J. Desarnaud, F. Bertrand, X. Chateau, and D. Bonn. Damage in porous media due to salt crystallization.Phys. Rev. E, 81:066110, 2010

  54. [62]

    Eloukabi, N

    H. Eloukabi, N. Sghaier, M. Prat, and S. Ben Nassrallah. Drying experiments in a hydrophobic model porous medium in the presence of a dissolved salt.Chem. Eng. T echnol., 34:1085–1094, 2011

  55. [63]

    Schiro, E

    M. Schiro, E. Ruiz-Agudo, and C. Rodriguez-Navarro. Damage mechanisms of porous materials due to in-pore salt crystallization.Phys. Rev. Lett., 109:265503, 2012

  56. [64]

    Veran-Tissoires, M

    S. Veran-Tissoires, M. Marcoux, and M. Prat. Discrete salt crystallization at the surface of a porous medium.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:054502, 2012

  57. [65]

    Veran-Tissoires, M

    S. Veran-Tissoires, M. Marcoux, and M. Prat. Salt crystallisation at the surface of a heterogeneous porous medium.Europhys. Lett., 98:34005, 2012

  58. [66]

    Hidri, N

    F. Hidri, N. Sghaier, H. Eloukabi, M. Prat, and S. Ben Nasrallah. Porous medium coffee ring effect and other factors affecting the first crystallisation time of sodium chloride at the surface of a drying porous medium.Phys. Fluids, 25:127101, 2013

  59. [67]

    Naillon, P

    A. Naillon, P. Joseph, and M. Prat. Ion transport and precipitation kinetics as key aspects of stress generation on pore walls induced by salt crystallization.Phys. Rev. Lett., 120:034502, 2018

  60. [68]

    M. J. Qazi, D. Bonn, and N. Shahidzadeh. Drying of salt solutions from porous media: effect of surfactants.Transp. Porous Med., 128:881–894, 2019

  61. [69]

    E. K. Luckins, C. J. W. Breward, I. M. Griffiths, and C. P. Please. Mathematical modelling of impurity deposition during evaporation of dirty liquid in a porous material.J. Fluid Mech., 986:A31, 2024

  62. [70]

    E. K. Luckins, C. J. W. Breward, I. M. Griffiths, and C. P. Please. The role of temperature and drying cycles on impurity deposition in drying porous media.Europhys. Lett., 146:33001, 2024

  63. [71]

    Le Dizès Castell, L

    R. Le Dizès Castell, L. Pel, T. Chekai, H. Derluyn, M. Scheel, S. Jabbari-Farouji, and N. Shahidzadeh. Sol-gel transition by evaporation in porous media.Phys. Rev. Appl., 21:034049, 2024

  64. [72]

    Wijnhorst, F

    R. Wijnhorst, F. Van der Sloot, L. Pel, and N. Shahidzadeh. Effect of evaporative surface area on salt efflorescence and subflorescence formation in a given porous material.Phys. Rev. Appl., 21:064055, 2024

  65. [73]

    E. K. Luckins. Mathematical modelling of drying capillary porous media.J. Fluid Mech., 1017:A6, 2025

  66. [74]

    Wijnhorst, T

    R. Wijnhorst, T. Chekai, S. Faucher, H. Derluyn, and N. Shahidzadeh. Salt crystallization at hydrophobic/hydrophilic interfaces in two- and three-dimensional model porous networks and its consequences on drying.Phys. Rev. Appl., 23:054048, 2025

  67. [75]

    R. J. Wijnhorst, M. Prat, and N. Shahidzadeh. Self-similarity in creeping salt crystallization. arXiv:2508.18779, 2025. 19

  68. [76]

    W. L. Olbricht. Pore-scale prototypes of multiphase flow in porous media.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 28:187–213, 1996

  69. [77]

    M. Prat. Recent advances in pore-scale models for drying of porous media.Chem. Eng. J,, 86:153– 164, 2002

  70. [78]

    Chauvet, P

    F. Chauvet, P. Duru, S. Geoffroy , and M. Prat. Three periods of drying of a single square capillary tube.Phys. Rev. Lett., 103:124502, 2009

  71. [79]

    Desarnaud, H

    J. Desarnaud, H. Derluyn, J. Carmeliet, D. Bonn, and N. Shahidzadeh. Metastability limit for the nucleation of NaCl crystals in confinement.J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5:890–895, 2014

  72. [80]

    Naillon, P

    A. Naillon, P. Duru, M. Marcoux, and M. Prat. Evaporation with sodium chloride crystallization in a capillary tube.J. Cryst. Growth, 422:52–61, 2015

  73. [81]

    M. J. Qazi, R. W. Liefferink, S. J. Schlegel, E. H. G. Backus, D. Bonn, and N. Shahidzadeh. Influence of surfactants on sodium chloride crystallization in confinement.Langmuir, 33:4260–4268, 2017

  74. [82]

    Roger and J

    K. Roger and J. J. Crassous. How the interplay of molecular and colloidal scales controls drying of microgel dispersions.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 118:e2105530118, 2021

  75. [83]

    Pingulkar and J.-B

    H. Pingulkar and J.-B. Salmon. Confined directional drying of a colloidal dispersion: kinetic modeling.Soft Matter, 19:2176–2185, 2023

  76. [84]

    Thayyil Raju, C

    L. Thayyil Raju, C. Diddens, J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, M. N. van der Linden, X. Zhang, D. Lohse, and U. Sen. Evaporation of binary liquids from a capillary tube.J. Fluid Mech., 983:A21, 2024

  77. [85]

    Z. Wang, D. Xu, Q. Song, S. Liu, X. Meng, S. Chen, P. Vana, and K. Zhang. Enhanced water evaporation via coupled capillary transport and gelation in confined nanocrystal systems.Phys. Rev. E, 112:045429, 2025

  78. [86]

    Huisman, W

    M. Huisman, W. Poon, P. B. Warren, S. Titmuss, and D. Mareduzzo. Diffusive evaporation dynamics in polymer solutions is ubiquitous.Soft Matter, 2025

  79. [87]

    H. E. Buckley .Crystal Growth. Wiley , 1951

  80. [88]

    E. R. Washburn. The creeping of solutions.J. Phys. Chem., 31:1246–1248, 1927

  81. [89]

    J. G. F. Druce. The creeping of solutions.J. Pharm., 119:333, 1927

  82. [90]

    Erlenmeyer

    H. Erlenmeyer. Über das Klettern von Krystallen.Helv. Chem. Acta, 10:896, 1927

  83. [91]

    T. H. Hazlehurst Jr., H. C. Martin, and L. Brewer. The creeping of saturated salt solutions.J. Phys. Chem., 40:439–452, 1936

  84. [92]

    Huang and J.-C

    B.-J. Huang and J.-C. Huang. Creeping-film phenomenon of potassium chloride solution.Nature, 261:36–38, 1976

  85. [93]

    Benavente, M

    D. Benavente, M. A. Garcıá del Cura, J. Garcıá-Guinea, S. Sánchez-Moral, and S. Ordóñez. Role of pore structure in salt crystallisation in unsaturated porous stone.J. Cryst. Growth, 260:532–544, 2004

  86. [94]

    W. J. P. van Enckevort and J. H. Los. On the creeping of saturated salt solutions.Cryst. Growth Des., 13:1838–1848, 2013

  87. [95]

    M. J. Qazi, H. Salim, C. A. W. Doorman, E. Jambon-Puillet, and N. Shahidzadeh. Salt creeping as a self-amplifying crystallization process.Sci. Adv., 5:eaax1853, 2019

  88. [96]

    Posern, K

    K. Posern, K. Linnow, M. Niermann, Ch. Kaps, and M. Steiger. Thermochemical investigation of the water uptake behavior of MgSO4 hydrates in host materials with different pore size.Thermochim. Acta, 611:1–9, 2015

  89. [97]

    Garzón-Tovar, J

    L. Garzón-Tovar, J. Pérez-Carvajal, I. Imaz, and D. Maspoch. Composite salt in porous metal-organic frameworks for adsorption heat transformation.Adv. Funct. Mater ., 27:1606424, 2017

  90. [98]

    P. A. Kallenberger and M. Fröba. Water harvesting from air with a hygroscopic salt in a hydrogel– derived matrix.Commun. Chem., 1:28, 2018

  91. [99]

    Desarnaud, H

    J. Desarnaud, H. Derluyn, L. Molari, S. de Miranda, V. Cnudde, and N. Shahidzadeh. Drying of salt contaminated porous media: Effect of primary and secondary nucleation.J. Appl. Phys., 118:114901, 2015

  92. [100]

    S. H. Strogatz.Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering. CRC Press, 2018

  93. [101]

    R. C. Hilborn.Chaos and Nonlinear Dynamics: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press, 2000

  94. [102]

    Guckenheimer and P

    J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes.Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. 20

  95. [103]

    A. C. Fowler.Mathematical Models in the Applied Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 1997

  96. [104]

    di Bernardo, C

    M. di Bernardo, C. J. Budd, A. R. Champneys, and P. Kowalczyk.Piecewise-smooth Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications. Springer London, 2008

  97. [105]

    Shaw.The Dripping Faucet as a Model Chaotic System

    R. Shaw.The Dripping Faucet as a Model Chaotic System. Aerial Press, 1984

  98. [106]

    Watanabe and K

    T. Watanabe and K. Nakano. Viscoelastic toy model explaining the static friction paradox in stick-slip instability without friction laws.Phys. Rev. E, 111:065504, 2025

  99. [107]

    Hurwitz and M

    S. Hurwitz and M. Manga. The fascinating and complex dynamics of geyser eruptions.Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 45:31–59, 2017

  100. [108]

    van der Pol

    B. van der Pol. On relaxation-oscillations.Philos. Mag., 2:978–992, 1926

  101. [109]

    Ginoux and C

    J.-M. Ginoux and C. Letellier. Van der Pol and the history of relaxation oscillations: Toward the emergence of a concept.Chaos, 22:023120, 2012

  102. [110]

    S. Martin. A hydrodynamic curiosity: The salt oscillator.Geophys. Fluid Dyn., 1:143–160, 1970

  103. [111]

    Yoshikawa, S

    K. Yoshikawa, S. Nakata, M. Yamanaka, and T. Waki. Amusement with a salt-water oscillator.J. Chem. Educ., 66:205–207, 1989

  104. [112]

    M. E. Wise, T. A. Semeniuk, R. Bruintjes, S. T. Martin, L. M. Russell, and P. R. Buseck. Hygroscopic behavior of NaCl-bearing natural aerosol particles using environmental transmission electron microscopy .J. Geophys. Res., 112, 2007

  105. [113]

    Dinar, I

    E. Dinar, I. Taraniuk, E. R. Graber, T. Anttila, T. F. Mentel, and Y. Rudich. Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric and model humic-like substances.J. Geophys. Res., 112:D05211, 2007

  106. [114]

    Bellezza, M

    H. Bellezza, M. Poizat, and O. Vincent. Salt crystallization and deliquescence triggered by humidity cycles in nanopores.arXiv:2510.27309, 2025

  107. [115]

    Crank.The Mathematics of Diffusion

    J. Crank.The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford University Press, 1975

  108. [116]

    E. R. Townsend, F. Swennenhuis, W. J. P. van Enckevort, J. A. M. Meijer, and E. Vlieg. Creeping: an efficient way to determine the anticaking ability of additives for sodium chloride.Cryst. Eng. Comm., 18:6176–6183, 2016

  109. [117]

    Lazhar, M

    R. Lazhar, M. Najjari, and M. Prat. Combined wicking and evaporation of NaCl solution with efflorescence formation: The efflorescence exclusion zone.Phys. Fluids, 32, 2020

  110. [118]

    Licsandru, C

    G. Licsandru, C. Noiriel, P. Duru, S. Geoffroy , A. Abou Chakra, and M. Prat. Dissolution-precipitation- driven upward migration of a salt crust.Phys. Rev. E, 100:032802, 2019

  111. [119]

    Y. O. Popov. Evaporative deposition patterns: Spatial dimensions of the deposit.Phys. Rev. E, 71:1–17, 2005

  112. [120]

    S. K. Wilson and H.-M. D’Ambrosio. Evaporation of sessile droplets.Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 55:481–509, 2023

  113. [121]

    Mikhailov, S

    E. Mikhailov, S. Vlasenko, R. Niessner, and U. Pöschl. Interaction of aerosol particles composed of protein and saltswith water vapor: hygroscopic growth and microstructural rearrangement.Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4:323–350, 2004

  114. [122]

    V. G. Levich.Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Prentice-Hall, 1962

  115. [123]

    L. Pel, H. Huinink, K. Kopinga, R. P. J. van Hees, and O. C. G. Adan. Efflorescence pathway diagram: understanding salt weathering.Const. Build. Mater ., 18:309–313, 2004

  116. [124]

    X. Li, D. Gupta, H.-J. Eom, H. Kim, and C.-U. Ro. Deliquescence and efflorescence behavior of individual NaCl and KCl mixture aerosol particles.Atmos. Environ., 82:36–43, 2014

  117. [125]

    S. T. Martin. Phase transitions of aqueous atmospheric particles.Chem. Rev., 100:3403–3454, 2000

  118. [126]

    Open Source Computer Vision Library , 2015

    OpenCV. Open Source Computer Vision Library , 2015

  119. [127]

    Rodríguez-Rodríguez and U

    J. Rodríguez-Rodríguez and U. Sen. Implementation of numerical solution for coupled, nonlinear dynamical system;https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21333687, 2026

  120. [128]

    A. C. Hindmarsh. ODEPACK, a systemized collection of ODE solvers.IMACS Trans. Sci. Comput., 1:55–64, 1983

  121. [129]

    L. Petzold. Automatic selection of methods for solving stiff and nonstiff systems of ordinary differential equations.SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 4:136–148, 1983

  122. [130]

    I. N. Tang and H. R. Munkelwitz. Water activities, densities, and refractive indices of aqueous sulfates and sodium nitrate droplets of atmospheric importance.J. Geophys. Res., 99:18801–18808, 1994

  123. [131]

    Mikhailov, S

    E. Mikhailov, S. Vlasenko, S. T. Martin, T. Koop, and U. Pöschl. Amorphous and crystalline aerosol particles interacting with water vapor: conceptual framework and experimental evidence for 21 restructuring, phase transitions and kinetic limitations.Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9:9491–...

  124. [132]

    Kashchiev.Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications

    D. Kashchiev.Nucleation: Basic Theory with Applications. Butterworth Heinemann, 2000

  125. [133]

    K. F. Kelton and A. L. Greer.Nucleation in Condensed Matter: Applications in Materials and Biology. Elsevier, 2010

  126. [134]

    P. G. Debenedetti.Metastable Liquids: Concepts and Principles. Princeton University Press, 1996

  127. [135]

    K. Binder. Theory of first-order phase transitions.Rep. Prog. Phys., 50:783–859, 1987

  128. [136]

    L. Goh, K. Chen, V. Bhamidi, G. He, N. C. S. Kee, P. J. A. Kenis, C. F. Zukoski III, and R. D. Braatz. A stochastic model for nucleation kinetics determination in droplet-based microfluidic systems.Cryst. Growth Des., 10:2515–2521, 2010. 22

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.