Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 35 references

Nonreciprocal Relaxation Acceleration

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A brief pulse of nonreciprocal dissipation accelerates convergence to a nonequilibrium steady state in a two-mode bosonic system, with a relaxation rate at least κ+λ compared with κ without it.

desk verdict The formal core is clean, but the paper never tests whether an equally strong local dissipative pulse gives the same speedup, so the central attribution to nonreciprocity is unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.13989 v1 pith:7G4BL5Q5 submitted 2026-07-15 quant-ph

Xingyu Zhang , Yihan Ma , Yue Liu , Niaz Ali Khan , Chenlong Huang , Yuguo Su , Junyan Luo , Dahai He This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph PACS 03.65.Yz05.30.-d42.50.Lc
keywords nonreciprocaldissipationrelaxationaccelerationnonequilibriumsteadystatetwo-modebosonicsystemcovariancematrixLyapunovequationquantumpreparationcontinuous-variablesystems
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that you can speed up relaxation to a nonequilibrium steady state—not just thermal equilibrium—by temporarily activating a nonreciprocal dissipative channel. In a two-mode bosonic system with local baths at different temperatures, switching on this chiral channel for a finite time pushes the state onto a faster trajectory, with covariance decay bounded by e^{-(κ+λ)t}(1+λt)^2 instead of e^{-κt}. The speedup is claimed to be independent of which way the nonreciprocity points. The practical motive is rapid state preparation and cooling in continuous-variable quantum devices.

What carries the argument

The key object is the nonreciprocal collective dissipator L = a1 - i e^{iθ}a2 (a chiral jump operator realized through a shared reservoir), along with the drift matrix A and diffusion matrix D in the covariance-matrix Lyapunov equation dV/dt = AV + VA^T + D. At the perfect nonreciprocity condition Γ=λ, the drift matrix becomes triangular for θ=0 or π, meaning one mode no longer feeds back into the other; this removes the imaginary eigenvalue splitting and shifts the real relaxation rate from κ/2 to (κ+λ)/2, which is what Eq. (11) quantifies.

What would settle it

Run the same two-mode relaxation with a control pulse that uses an equally strong reciprocal collective dissipator (e.g., L=a1+a2) or simply adds local damping Γ to both modes, and measure ||V(t)-V_0^ss||_F. If the decay rate is again κ+Γ, the nonreciprocal phase is not the active ingredient; if the rate stays closer to κ, then directionality matters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is that an engineered dissipative channel with jump operator L = a1 - i e^{iθ} a2, activated transiently at strength Γ = λ, makes the drift matrix of the two-mode system degenerate with eigenvalues -(κ+λ)/2, suppressing the coherent inter-mode oscillations that slow reciprocal relaxation. The paper derives a Frobenius-norm bound for the covariance matrix, ||V_G(t)-V_G^ss||_F ≤ e^{-(κ+λ)t}(1+λt)^2 ||V(0)-V_G^ss||_F, giving an asymptotic relaxation rate of at least κ+λ versus κ for reciprocal dynamics. Because the same degenerate spectrum occurs for θ=0 and θ=π, the acceleration is direction-independent. The authors also show that for finite-temperature baths the nonreciproc

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes the speedup to nonreciprocity, but its own spectral calculation shows that any additional dissipative channel of strength Γ widens the gap from κ/2 to (κ+Γ)/2 regardless of phase; the load-bearing, untested premise is that chirality specifically—not just added dissipation—is what accelerates relaxation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A transient nonreciprocal pulse can shorten the relaxation time of a two-mode bosonic system to a nonequilibrium steady state from about 1/κ to about 1/(κ+λ).
  • The acceleration is not limited to coherent initial states; the covariance-matrix bound covers thermal states, which are the relevant states for quantum thermodynamics.
  • Reversing the chiral direction (θ=0 vs θ=π) leaves the relaxation rate unchanged, so the protocol does not need to be aligned with the macroscopic heat current.
  • Optimal performance occurs at low reservoir temperatures, where the reciprocal and nonreciprocal steady states nearly coincide and the pulse can simply be truncated.
  • The covariance bound supplies a sufficient condition, Eq. (13), for when nonreciprocal acceleration beats natural decay; at high temperatures that condition is harder to satisfy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the mechanism appears to be gap widening by added dissipation rather than by chirality per se, since the diagonal damping in the drift matrix is -(κ+Γ)/2 for any θ; a reciprocal or purely local dissipation pulse of the same strength should also raise the rate to κ+Γ, so the claim would need a control comparison to single out nonreciprocity.
  • Editorial inference: the same Lyapunov-bound technique could extend to larger Gaussian networks, where a triangularization of the drift matrix via engineered dissipation would give multi-exponential decay bounds—a design principle for fast state preparation in optomechanical or superconducting arrays.
  • Editorial inference: because the acceleration is direction-independent, the protocol is insensitive to calibration of the chiral phase, which is experimentally convenient but also weakens the evidence that nonreciprocity—rather than any strong damping pulse—is the active resource.
  • Editorial inference: a natural next test is to replace the shared-bath nonreciprocal channel with a reciprocal collective dissipator such as L=a1+a2 or local dampers of strength Γ; if the relaxation rate remains κ+Γ, then the useful resource is dissipation strength, not directionality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies two bosonic modes coupled to local thermal baths at different temperatures, with a shared-bath engineered nonreciprocal dissipator L = a1 - i e^{iθ} a2. Under the perfect nonreciprocity condition Γ=λ (θ=0 or π), the mean-field drift matrix in Eq. (4) acquires degenerate real eigenvalues -(κ+λ)/2, and the covariance evolution in Eqs. (8)-(11) is claimed to relax to the nonreciprocal steady state with asymptotic rate at least κ+λ. The authors propose a transient pulse protocol, truncating the nonreciprocal channel at an optimal time, as a shortcut to the reciprocal NESS, and support this with trace-distance and heat-current simulations for both coherent and thermal initial states.

Significance. The analytical treatment of the covariance dynamics is internally consistent: Eq. (10) is an exact expression for the Gaussian covariance evolution, Eq. (11) is a valid Frobenius-norm bound, and the simulations cover the claimed parameter regimes. If the acceleration were specifically due to nonreciprocity, the pulse-control idea would be a useful technique for preparing continuous-variable NESSs. However, the central attribution to nonreciprocity is not established because the manuscript never compares against an equally strong reciprocal or local dissipative pulse. The result as it stands is therefore a plausible cooling/shortcut protocol whose mechanism is not yet isolated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (4), and Sec. II.C, Eq. (11)] The central claim is not separated from the trivial effect of added damping. The diagonal entries of the drift matrix are -(κ+Γ)/2 independent of θ, meaning the nonreciprocal channel is equivalent, at the level of diagonal damping, to adding a local dissipation of strength Γ on each mode. Such a reciprocal control has drift A = -(κ+Γ)/2 I + A_H and, for the covariance matrix, an asymptotic relaxation rate κ+Γ to its own steady state; for Γ=λ this is exactly the rate in Eq. (11). The nonreciprocal phase only removes the imaginary eigenvalue splitting. The paper compares Γ=0 with Γ=λ but never with a local or reciprocal dissipative pulse of the same strength. A control simulation with, say, local damping Γ on each mode and the same pulse-cutoff procedure is required before the effect can be attributed to nonreciprocity.
  2. [Sec. II.C, Eqs. (12)-(13)] Equation (11) bounds convergence to the nonreciprocal steady state V_G^ss, not to the target reciprocal steady state V_0^ss. The step to the target-state claim is Eq. (13), which is only a sufficient condition. The manuscript does not verify, either analytically or numerically for the parameters of Figs. 2-3, that Eq. (13) actually holds. Since the term ||V_G^ss - V_0^ss|| grows with temperature, the regime of validity of the shortcut is not quantified. Please provide a direct check of Eq. (13) for the reported parameter sets, or an alternative derivation that establishes convergence to V_0^ss.
  3. [Sec. IV and Fig. 2] The pulse turn-off time T_opt is chosen by minimizing the trace distance to the target reciprocal NESS, using information about V_0^ss and the instantaneous state. No protocol for choosing T_opt without such knowledge is given, and the comparison is only between the nonreciprocal pulse and the no-pulse reciprocal dynamics. If a simple local-damping pulse with the same integrated dissipation and the same optimization procedure performs equally well, the contribution becomes a cooling protocol rather than a nonreciprocal acceleration. The authors should compare against the reciprocal/local control under the same T_opt optimization and report the relative gain in state-preparation time.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The legend entry 'Near (Always Γ = 0)' is confusing; the near curve also has Γ=0 in the natural-decay part. Rephrase to make clear which curves include the nonreciprocal pulse.
  2. [General] The text uses 'thermalization' in several places where the target is a nonequilibrium steady state. Please use 'convergence to the NESS' consistently.
  3. [Eq. (13)] Equation (13) is a sufficient condition, not an equivalence. The sentence introducing it should say 'A sufficient condition for nonreciprocal acceleration is...' rather than implying the condition is necessary.
  4. [Sec. IV, Eq. (19)] The derivation assumes the engineered shared bath is at zero temperature, while the local baths are at occupations n_1,n_2. This assumption should be stated prominently in the main text, because the effective nonreciprocal Lindblad term in Eq. (19) only holds for a zero-temperature shared bath.
  5. [Sec. III heading] The heading 'INST ANT ANEOUS CURRENT' contains a typo; it should be 'INSTANTANEOUS CURRENT'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the speedup rate is derived directly from the Lindblad drift matrix, with no fitted inputs, no load-bearing self-citations, and no predictions equivalent to their inputs.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim follows from an explicit diagonalization of the drift matrix U in Eq. (4). The eigenvalues are µ± = −(κ+Γ)/2 ± ½√(−λ̃12*λ̃21). With Γ=0 they are −κ/2 ± iλ/2; with Γ=λ and θ=0 or π they become degenerate at −(κ+λ)/2. This is a direct mathematical consequence of the Lindblad master equation, not a fitted result. The covariance bound Eq. (11) is derived from the closed-form Lyapunov solution (8) and standard norm inequalities; Eq. (13) is a sufficient condition obtained via the triangle inequality and the exact reciprocal decay (9). No external data, fitted constants, or calibrated parameters enter these derivations. The only optimization is the finite pulse duration, chosen by minimizing the trace distance to the reciprocal NESS; this is a control protocol, not a parameter fit used to manufacture the speedup. The paper's self-citation [24] appears in a background list of nonreciprocity applications and is not load-bearing; the model and mean-field equations are attributed to external references [19,20]. The paper explicitly acknowledges limitations: the mean-field argument does not apply to thermal states (Sec. II B), and higher bath temperatures make the sufficient condition Eq. (13) harder to satisfy. The pulse cutoff also requires knowledge of the target NESS, as stated in Sec. II A; this is an operational limitation, not a circular step. A possible scientific concern—that an equally strong reciprocal or local dissipative pulse might produce the same asymptotic rate because the diagonal damping in Eq. (4) is θ-independent—concerns the physical attribution of the speedup to nonreciprocity, not the internal circularity of the derivation. The derivation is self-contained and would remain valid if the engineered channel were labeled purely dissipative.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on model parameters and control choices rather than on new physical entities. The key free parameters are the nonreciprocal strength Γ, the pulse truncation time, and the selected bath occupations. The assumptions are standard open-quantum-system approximations plus the perfect-nonreciprocity tuning. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • nonreciprocal dissipation strength Γ = Γ = λ
    The speedup requires setting Γ equal to the coherent coupling λ (the 'perfect nonreciprocity' condition). This is chosen by hand to make λ~12 or λ~21 vanish, and it directly sets the increased relaxation rate κ+λ.
  • pulse truncation time T_opt = determined numerically as argmin_t D_tr(ρ(t), ρ_ss)
    The protocol's success depends on switching off the nonreciprocal channel at the instant when the transient state is closest to the target reciprocal NESS. This time is not derived from a general rule but is found using knowledge of the target state, making it a post-hoc control parameter.
  • reservoir occupations n1, n2 = n1=0.15, n2=0.05
    Chosen to provide a non-zero temperature gradient while staying in the low-temperature regime where the acceleration is most pronounced. The paper explicitly notes that higher temperatures make the effect harder to achieve.
  • coherent coupling λ and local dissipation κ = λ=0.1, κ=0.02
    Model parameters chosen for numerical illustration; they satisfy the timescale separation κ ≪ λ. They are not fitted to data but are fine-tuned to make the speedup visible.
  • initial state parameters = coherent amplitude 1.4; thermal occupations 3.0 and 0.05 for the 'far' state
    The numerical demonstrations use specific initial states chosen to be far from the target NESS. The acceleration is shown only for these selected states.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The system is Gaussian, and the covariance matrix closes
    All Lindblad operators are linear in the quadratures and the Hamiltonian is quadratic, so first and second moments fully describe the state. Used throughout Sec. II C.
  • domain assumption Born-Markov approximation and rotating-wave approximation for the shared engineered bath
    Used in Sec. IV to derive the effective nonreciprocal Lindblad master equation (19) from the microscopic pulse-driven Hamiltonian (14)-(15). Assumes fast bath relaxation and neglects counter-rotating terms.
  • domain assumption The shared engineered bath is at zero temperature
    The collective nonreciprocal dissipator D[a1 − i e^{iθ}a2] is derived assuming a zero-temperature bath in Sec. IV. In Sec. II the same dissipator is simply postulated without an explicit temperature.
  • domain assumption Resonance condition ω1=ω2=ω0 and symmetric local dissipation κ1=κ2=κ
    The closed-form eigenvalues in Eq. (4) and the covariance formulas Eqs. (9)-(11) rely on these conditions. For unequal frequencies or damping the simple degenerate-eigenvalue result and the exact bound may not hold.
  • domain assumption The target NESS is the reciprocal steady state with Γ=0, and the pulse can be switched off suddenly at T_opt
    Speedup is defined relative to the Γ=0 NESS. The protocol requires an instantaneous switch back to the reciprocal Liouvillian at the optimal time; imperfections in this switch are not modeled.
  • domain assumption Fock-space truncation Nc=16 is sufficient for the numerics
    The numerical master-equation simulations truncate the local Fock basis to 16 states per mode. The paper does not discuss truncation-error checks, though the parameters (low occupations) make this plausible.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonreciprocal Relaxation Acceleration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7G4BL5Q5

@misc{pith2026260713989,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonreciprocal Relaxation Acceleration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7G4BL5Q5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.13989}
}
read the original abstract

Driven by recent discoveries regarding the quantum Mpemba effect, the anomalous relaxation dynamics of open quantum systems have garnered significant attention. While expediting thermalization to equilibrium has been extensively studied, dynamically accelerating the convergence toward nonequilibrium steady states remains a formidable challenge. In this article, we find a transient engineered nonreciprocal dissipative channel can provide a shortcut that accelerates convergence to the target reciprocal nonequilibrium steady state for the considered two-mode model and initial states. Using interacting bosonic modes, we demonstrate that the temporal activation of a nonreciprocal channel efficiently suppresses prolonged inter-mode energy oscillations, enforcing a rapid, unidirectional thermal dump into the environment. Counterintuitively, we find that this relaxation speedup is robust and independent of the direction of the nonreciprocity. Our results provide a powerful thermodynamic technique for rapid state preparation and cooling in continuous-variable quantum systems, particularly critical for low-temperature quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13989 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Operational principle of nonreciprocal relaxation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dynamics of nonreciprocal relaxation acceleration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Instantaneous heat currents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Here,D[o]˜ρ= o˜ρo† − 1 2 {o†o,˜ρ}denotes the Lindblad dissipator

    is the Hamiltonian of the two-mode bosonic system, andL= a1 −ie iθa2 is the jump operator associated with the nonreciprocal dissipation strength Γ. Here,D[o]˜ρ= o˜ρo† − 1 2 {o†o,˜ρ}denotes the Lindblad dissipator. Assuming resonance condition (ω 1 =ω 2 =ω 0), we transform into the rotating frame defined byρ= ei(ω1a† 1a1+ω2a† 2a2)t ˜ρe−i(ω1a† 1a1+ω2a† 2a2)...

  2. [2]

    and the bath HamiltonianH bath = P k ωkb† kbk. To explicitly engineer the desired nonreciprocity, the system is subjected to an external temporal pulse, lead- ing to the interaction Hamiltonian Hint(t) = X j=1,2 η(t) cos(ωpt+ϕ j)(aj +a † j) X k gk(bk +b † k). (15) The nonreciprocal behavior is engineered by tailoring the controlled driving pulseη(t) cos(ω...

  3. [3]

    F. Ares, P. Calabrese, and S. Murciano, The quantum Mpemba effects, Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 451 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    (16) The terms in the interaction Hamiltonian ˜Hint(t) take the form 1 2 ei(ωpt+ϕj )aje−iω0tb† keiωkt = 1 2 eiϕj ajb† kei(ωp−ω0+ωk)t

    + ˜Hint(t), ρS+B i + X j=1,2 κj (nj + 1)D[aj]ρS+B +n jD[a† j]ρS+B . (16) The terms in the interaction Hamiltonian ˜Hint(t) take the form 1 2 ei(ωpt+ϕj )aje−iω0tb† keiωkt = 1 2 eiϕj ajb† kei(ωp−ω0+ωk)t. (17) By imposing the rotating-wave approximation (R W A) to neglect rapidly oscillating counter-rotating terms, the ef- fective interaction Hamiltonian sim...

  5. [5]

    E. B. Mpemba and D. G. Osborne, Cool?, Phys. Educ. 4, 172 (1969)

    1969

  6. [6]

    Lu and O

    Z. Lu and O. Raz, Nonequilibrium thermodynamics of the markovian mpemba effect and its inverse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.114, 5083 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Van Vu and H

    T. Van Vu and H. Hayakawa, Thermomajorization mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 107101 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    G. Teza, J. Bechhoefer, A. Lasanta, O. Raz, and M. Vucelja, Speedups in nonequilibrium thermal relax- ation: Mpemba and related effects, Phys. Rep.1164, 1 (2026)

    2026

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Bao and Z

    R. Bao and Z. Hou, Accelerating quantum relaxation via temporary reset: A mpemba-inspired approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 150403 (2025)

    2025

  2. [10]

    Chang, S

    W.-X. Chang, S. Yin, S.-X. Zhang, and Z.-X. Li, Imaginary-time mpemba effect in quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 100403 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    L. K. Joshi, J. Franke, A. Rath, F. Ares, S. Murciano, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, B. Vermersch, P. Cal- abrese, C. F. Roos, and M. K. Joshi, Observing the quan- tum mpemba effect in quantum simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010402 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Aharony Shapira, Y

    S. Aharony Shapira, Y. Shapira, J. Markov, G. Teza, N. Akerman, O. Raz, and R. Ozeri, Inverse mpemba ef- fect demonstrated on a single trapped ion qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 010403 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Zhang, H.-G

    Z.-Z. Zhang, H.-G. Luo, and W. Wu, Quantum mpemba effect induced by non-markovian exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 210402 (2026)

    2026

  6. [14]

    A. K. Chatterjee, S. Takada, and H. Hayakawa, Quantum mpemba effect in a quantum dot with reservoirs, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 080402 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Shtanko, Y.-J

    O. Shtanko, Y.-J. Liu, S. Lieu, A. V. Gorshkov, and V. V. Albert, Bounds on Autonomous Quantum Error Correc- tion, Quantum9, 1804 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    D. J. Strachan, A. Purkayastha, and S. R. Clark, Non- markovian quantum mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 220403 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Moroder, O

    M. Moroder, O. Culhane, K. Zawadzki, and J. Goold, Thermodynamics of the quantum mpemba effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 140404 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Pocklington and A

    A. Pocklington and A. A. Clerk, Accelerating dissipative state preparation with adaptive open quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 050603 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    A. A. Clerk, Introduction to quantum non-reciprocal in- teractions: from non-Hermitian Hamiltonians to quan- tum master equations and quantum feedforward schemes, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 44 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    T. N. Ikeda and M. Sato, General description for nonequi- librium steady states in periodically driven dissipative quantum systems, Science Advances6, eabb4019 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.abb4019

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    Asadian, D

    A. Asadian, D. Manzano, M. Tiersch, and H. J. Briegel, Heat transport through lattices of quantum harmonic os- cillators in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. E87, 012109 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Kosloff and A

    R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum heat engines and refrig- erators: Continuous devices, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry65, 365 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Xie and C

    D. Xie and C. Xu, Quantum sensing with nonreciprocal couplings, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064072 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    E. I. R. Chiacchio, A. Nunnenkamp, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal dicke model, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 113602 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Ahmadi, P

    B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, P. Horodecki, and S. Barzanjeh, Nonreciprocal quantum batteries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 210402 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    and cavity optomechanical architectures [27, 28], have successfully implemented robust nonreciprocal de- vices. Given that introducing nonreciprocity dynamically alters the spectrum of the system’s Liouvillian superop- erator, a fundamental question naturally arises: can such ...

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nadolny, C

    T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli, Nonreciprocal synchronization of active quantum spins, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    N. A. Khan, X. Zhang, C. Huang, Y. Liu, and D. He, Col- lective enhancement in nonreciprocal multimode quan- tum batteries, Phys. Rev. B112, 104318 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable josephson circulator/directional amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Shen, Y.-L

    Z. Shen, Y.-L. Zhang, Y. Chen, C.-L. Zou, Y.-F. Xiao, X.-B. Zou, F.-W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Ex- perimental realization of optomechanically induced non- reciprocity, Nat. Photonics10, 657 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Mar- quardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non- reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nat. Phys.13, 465 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum Computation and Quantum Information(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  26. [34]

    G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, Current fluctuations in open quantum sys- tems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics, PRX Quan- tum5, 020201 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Yan, Y.-J

    W.-B. Yan, Y.-J. Zhang, Y.-J. Xia, H. Fan, and Z.-X. Man, Nonreciprocal quantum mpemba effect, (2026), arXiv:2607.12966 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.