Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 298 references

Using the deepest low-frequency radio images of a galaxy cluster obtained to date, this paper reports the first indication that the magnetic field in Abell 2255 is organized into coherent large-scale patterns—quasi-radial in the halo bridge

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 02:45 UTC pith:HYMO7IVZ

load-bearing objection Deepest cluster radio image and a full-cluster SIG topology map, but the coherent-field claim rests on an unquantified assumption; worth refereeing with revisions. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14209 v1 pith:HYMO7IVZ submitted 2026-07-15 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

The topology of the magnetic field in Abell 2255 out to its virial radius. Results from the LOFAR Galaxy Cluster Ultra-Deep Field

A. Botteon , R. J. van Weeren , Y. Hu , F. Vazza , G. Brunetti , K. Rajpurohit , A. Lazarian , T. W. Shimwell
show 9 more authors
E. De Rubeis M. Balboni A. Bonafede R. Cassano G. Di Gennaro F. Gastaldello M. J. Hardcastle A. Ignesti H. J. A. R\"ottgering
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords galaxy clustersintracluster mediummagnetic fieldssynchrotron emissionradio relicsradio haloslow-frequency radio astronomyMHD turbulence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents 224 hours of low-frequency radio observations of the galaxy cluster Abell 2255—the deepest such image of a cluster to date—and uses them to test whether the cluster's magnetic field has large-scale order. Applying the synchrotron intensity gradient (SIG) technique, the authors infer that the field is quasi-radial in the radio bridges and halo extensions and quasi-tangential in the relics, with a more chaotic orientation in the core. They interpret this as the first indication of a coherent magnetic field topology spanning an entire cluster from core to virial radius, shaped by the cluster's merger and accretion dynamics. If correct, the result would show that cluster magnetic fields are not merely tangled on small scales but carry an imprint of the cluster's formation history on megaparsec scales.

Core claim

The central claim is that the magnetic field in Abell 2255 is organized into coherent, region-dependent orientations: quasi-radial (pointing outward from the cluster center) in the radio bridge and spur structures, and quasi-tangential (aligned along the structure) in the radio relics. The central halo shows a broader, less ordered distribution. The authors argue that this pattern traces the dynamical processes of the cluster's ongoing merger: accretion flows stretch the field radially, while shocks compress it tangentially. They support this with a qualitative comparison to a cosmological magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a cluster with a similar major merger, which shows the same sort of s

What carries the argument

The synchrotron intensity gradient (SIG) technique. It assumes that MHD turbulence in the intracluster medium produces eddies elongated along the local magnetic field, so that gradients of synchrotron intensity are preferentially perpendicular to the field. By averaging gradient orientations in sub-blocks and smoothing pseudo-Stokes parameters, the method yields the projected magnetic field direction even where Faraday depolarization makes polarization measurements impossible. It is applied here to a 35-arcsecond-resolution image with discrete sources subtracted, and its robustness to imaging choices is checked by varying the inner uv-cuts used for source subtraction and extended-emission re

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that intensity gradients in the faint diffuse emission trace magnetic field orientation rather than spatial variations of cosmic-ray electron density or projection effects; the paper states the CR-density contribution has not been systematically quantified.

What would settle it

Measure Faraday rotation measures from a dense grid of polarized background sources across the bridges of A2255 at frequencies around 1-4 GHz; if the projected field orientations disagree with the SIG-inferred radial pattern, the claim fails. Alternatively, a cosmic-ray density map from gamma-ray or hard X-ray observations showing that the bridges are dominated by CR gradients would support the alternative interpretation.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The SIG technique can trace cluster magnetic field geometry in regions where Faraday rotation and polarization are unavailable, such as radio halos and faint bridges.
  • If the inferred topology is real, cluster magnetic fields are not uniformly tangled but organized in coherent patches of hundreds of kiloparsecs shaped by the cluster's merger and accretion history.
  • Ultra-deep low-frequency observations, comparable to those expected from future arrays like SKA-Low, could routinely map magnetized gas in the cosmic web, not just in clusters.
  • The detection of a candidate radio relic about 2.7 Mpc east of the cluster center adds a new constraint on the shock structure in A2255's outskirts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this pattern is generic, SIG maps of merging clusters could be combined with X-ray or Sunyaev-Zel'dovich velocity-field reconstructions to test whether the radial/tangential dichotomy traces the direction of accreting matter.
  • The method's unquantified sensitivity to cosmic-ray density gradients could be tested by comparing SIG maps with cosmic-ray tracers (for example, gamma-ray or hard X-ray emission) in clusters where those data exist.
  • The qualitative simulation match suggests a quantitative prediction: the orientation-angle distribution in the bridges should statistically track the local velocity field of accreting gas, a prediction testable with the next generation of cosmological MHD simulations.
  • The new deep images reveal faint filaments in the central region; these could be followed up with polarization observations to independently verify SIG's field orientation on small scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents 224 h of LOFAR 120–168 MHz observations of Abell 2255, reaching 24 uJy/beam at 7.1"x4.3" resolution, which the authors describe as the deepest low-frequency image of a galaxy cluster obtained to date. After subtracting discrete sources, they apply the synchrotron intensity gradient (SIG) technique to a 35"-resolution image and report that the inferred projected magnetic field is quasi-radial in the halo bridges/extensions and quasi-tangential in the relics, with a broader distribution in the cluster center. They compare these orientations with a cosmological MHD resimulation and with VLA polarization data in the F1–F3 filaments (median alignment measure AM=0.75). The central claim is that this provides the first indication of a coherent, large-scale magnetic field topology across an entire cluster, from core to outskirts.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, this would be an important observational result: a direct, Mpc-scale map of the projected magnetic-field orientation in the ICM, complementary to Faraday rotation studies and unaffected by depolarization. The imaging effort is substantial, the calibration is carefully described, and the robustness tests in Appendix B (median AM~1 across a range of inner uv cuts) are well designed. The independent polarization check in Fig. 9 provides meaningful validation in the central filaments. However, the central claim rests on the SIG assumption that intensity gradients trace magnetic-field orientation rather than cosmic-ray (CR) spatial distribution, a limitation that the paper explicitly leaves unquantified (Sec. 4.1). The supporting simulation also assumes CR emissivity proportional to n_e, so it cannot test the CR-gradient alternative. The result is therefore promising and timely, but the Mpc-scale coherent-topology claim is not yet fully secured.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The foundational assumption of SIG as applied here—that synchrotron intensity gradients are dominated by magnetic-field orientation—is explicitly conceded to be unquantified with respect to CR spatial variations. The text states that CR density 'could, in principle, also contribute to the observed gradients' and that 'this effect has not yet been systematically quantified.' This is particularly concerning for the faint bridges and outskirts, where the surface brightness is low, CR injection at shocks and transport can produce large spatial contrasts, and morphological gradients of the emission itself may dominate. The quasi-radial and quasi-tangential pattern reported in Figs. 6–7, and the related central claim in the abstract, therefore require a quantitative test of this contamination. I recommend either post-processing a simulation with a separately evolving CR population or construct
  2. [Sec. 5, Fig. 10] The cosmological simulation comparison projects the magnetic field weighted by P_R = n_e B^2, i.e., it implicitly assumes the synchrotron emissivity is proportional to the thermal electron density. This cannot validate the SIG interpretation against CR-density gradients because a spatially varying CR distribution—not simply tied to n_e—is precisely the alternative hypothesis. In addition, the comparison is only qualitative ('qualitative resemblance'); no quantitative AM or similar metric is computed for the simulated field orientations. A quantitative synthetic-observation test, comparing the true projected B orientation with the SIG-recovered orientation in the simulation, would significantly strengthen the claim.
  3. [Sec. 4.2, Fig. 9] The independent polarization validation is limited to the F1–F3 filaments in the cluster center. The main new claims concern the bridges and relics, for which no independent polarization data are presented. The polarization comparison itself shows a clear mismatch in part of F1 when the bright 'T-bone' AGN dominates the local gradients, demonstrating that the method can be strongly affected by non-ICM surface-brightness structure. This raises the concern that the bridge/relic orientations could be contaminated by residual source-subtraction artifacts or by intrinsic brightness gradients of the diffuse emission. I request a null or bootstrap test—e.g., randomizing intensities within the regions or using synthetic gradients—to quantify the statistical significance of the reported radial/tangential dichotomy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (1)] The finite-difference expressions appear to be missing parentheses: ∇x I(x,y)=I(x+δx,y)−I(x,y)/δx should read [I(x+δx,y)−I(x,y)]/δx, with the analogous correction for ∇y I. As written, only I(x,y) is divided by δx.
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption says 'The displayed FoVs are 45, 65, and 100 arcmin2.' This should presumably be 'arcmin' or 'arcmin × arcmin' to describe a linear field of view, not an area; the current wording is ambiguous.
  3. [Sec. 5] The statement that the initial magnetic seed field is 'B0 = 0.3 nG in all directions' is slightly unclear. It would help to state explicitly that the field is uniformly seeded in the simulation volume with a constant vector (or with equal rms components) and to note whether this choice affects the resulting topology.
  4. [Fig. 5] The line integral convolution visualization is informative, but no parameters (e.g., LIC kernel length) are given. A brief description in the caption or text would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The large-scale 'B topology' is, by Eq. (3), the tangent of the input intensity contours; the radial/tangential pattern in bridges and relics is therefore built into the method rather than independently measured.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.1, Eqs. (1)-(3); Sec. 4.2, Fig. 7]
    "The final projected magnetic field direction inferred with the SIG method is then obtained as ψ_B(x,y)=ψ_g(x,y)+π/2, reflecting the perpendicular alignment between synchrotron gradients and magnetic field lines expected in the theoretical framework outlined above."

    ψ_g is the direction of the spatial gradient of the observed intensity map (Eq. 1). Rotating by π/2 makes ψ_B tangent to the iso-intensity contours of that same map. Hence, for any elongated emission feature, the 'inferred magnetic field' is by construction parallel to the feature's long axis. The regions selected as bridges/extensions are radial protuberances of the halo and the relics are tangentially elongated arcs; the paper's result that B is quasi-radial in the former and quasi-tangential in the latter (Sec. 4.2, Fig. 7) is therefore already encoded in the morphology used to define those regions. It is a coordinate transform of the input radio image, not an independent measurement of B. The only non-tautological content is the assumption that the intensity-gradient direction is contr

full rationale

The paper's central claim—a coherent, large-scale magnetic-field topology across A2255—is obtained by applying the SIG method, whose output is defined as the intensity-gradient direction rotated by 90° (Eq. 3). Since the gradient direction of an elongated radio structure is perpendicular to its long axis, the inferred B field necessarily lies along the elongation of that structure. The paper then finds exactly this: bridges (radially elongated) show quasi-radial B and relics (tangentially elongated) show quasi-tangential B. This part of the derivation reduces by construction to the input morphology and is the main circular element. The circularity is only partial. The method receives independent support from the comparison with VLA polarization in the F1-F3 filaments, where the median alignment measure is AM=0.75 (Sec. 5, Fig. 9), showing that in at least those regions the gradient-to-B mapping is not purely definitional. Also, the inner-uvcut robustness tests (Appendix B.2) demonstrate that the SIG maps are stable against imaging choices, which strengthens the empirical content. A further limitation, not by itself a circular step, is the acknowledged possibility that cosmic-ray density variations contribute to the observed intensity gradients (Sec. 4.1: 'the latter could, in principle, also contribute to the observed gradients' and 'this effect has not yet been systematically quantified'). The supporting cosmological simulation weights the projected magnetic field by P_R = n_e B^2, i.e., it assumes CR emissivity follows the thermal density, so that simulation cannot test the CR-contamination alternative. This weakens the independent force of the simulation comparison, but the simulation is a forward MHD model rather than a refit of the observed B map. Overall, the paper contains a real, load-bearing definitional reduction for the large-scale topology claim, but it is partially offset by the polarization check and the robustness analysis. A score of 6 reflects that one of the central 'findings' (radial versus tangential B by region) is largely imposed by the estimator's construction, while the work still contains some independent observational evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the SIG framework (a domain assumption borrowed from the same community), on an unquantified cosmic-ray vs. magnetic-field degeneracy, and on a qualitative match to a co-author's own simulation. No new physical entities are introduced; the candidate E relic is an observed structure, not an invented mechanism.

free parameters (5)
  • SIG sub-block size = 20 × 20 pixels
    Set to 20×20 pixels following Hu et al. (2024); the inferred magnetic field orientation depends on this choice.
  • Gaussian smoothing kernel FWHM = equal to sub-block size (20 pixels)
    Used to smooth pseudo-Stokes parameters; affects coherence of inferred field.
  • Intensity threshold = 3σ_rms
    Only pixels above 3σ used for gradient analysis; affects coverage and statistics.
  • Reference imaging resolution = 35″ circular beam (≈53 kpc)
    Chosen as compromise between sensitivity to extended emission and spatial information; SIG results may depend on resolution.
  • Inner uv cut for subtraction/imaging = 5000λ (subtraction), 60λ (imaging)
    Reference values; tested in Appendix B with AM≈1 but distributions show small differences.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption MHD turbulence in the ICM is super-Alfvénic with anisotropic cascade; intensity gradients are perpendicular to the local magnetic field
    Adopted from Lazarian et al. (2017); foundational for SIG; Section 4.1.
  • domain assumption Synchrotron emissivity correlates with magnetic field so gradients trace B rather than cosmic-ray spatial distribution
    Section 4.1 acknowledges this 'has not yet been systematically quantified'.
  • domain assumption Line-of-sight averaging preserves statistical alignment between SIG and B
    Based on Hu et al. (2024) simulations; Section 4.1.
  • domain assumption The Enzo cosmological MHD resimulation of a Coma-like cluster is representative of A2255's magnetic field topology
    Used for qualitative comparison in Section 5; simulation assumes B0=0.3 nG uniform seed, 8 AMR levels.
  • standard math Standard ΛCDM cosmology with H0=70, Ωm=0.3, ΩΛ=0.7
    Adopted for distance scale; Section 1.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25735 in / 9829 out tokens · 95820 ms · 2026-08-02T02:45:27.704407+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present the LOFAR Galaxy Cluster Ultra-Deep Field, in which 336 h of LOFAR observations at 120$-$168 MHz have been collected on the nearby ($z=0.080$) cluster Abell 2255. This massive and merging system is known to host spectacular radio emission from both cluster galaxies and the intracluster medium. Previous LOFAR observations revealed pervasive diffuse synchrotron emission extending from the cluster center to its dynamically active outskirts, tracing relativistic electrons propagating in large-scale magnetic fields. In this work, we present a set of new ultra-deep images at the central frequency of 144 MHz based on the 224 h of data with the best quality, which reach a sensitivity of 24 $\mu$Jy beam$^{-1}$ at 7.1" $\times$ 4.3" resolution. These images represent the deepest radio observations of a galaxy cluster obtained to date and provide a glimpse of what should be routinely observed in clusters with SKA-Low in the near future. Using these data, we investigate the topology of the cluster magnetic field out to its virial radius by applying the synchrotron intensity gradient technique. We find that the inferred magnetic field exhibits preferential orientations in distinct regions of the cluster, such as in the radio halo extensions (bridges) and in the relics, suggesting that the dynamics of the cluster formation process is shaping the large-scale magnetic field. This interpretation is supported by the comparison with the magnetic field orientation obtained from cosmological magnetohydrodynamic simulations. This work provides the first indication of a coherent, large-scale magnetic field topology across an entire galaxy cluster, from core to outskirts, and demonstrates the unique power of ultra-deep, low-frequency observations to trace the structure of cluster magnetic fields on megaparsec scales, thereby probing the magnetization of the large-scale structure of the Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14209 by A. Bonafede, A. Botteon, A. Ignesti, A. Lazarian, E. De Rubeis, F. Gastaldello, F. Vazza, G. Brunetti, G. Di Gennaro, H. J. A. R\"ottgering, K. Rajpurohit, M. Balboni, M. J. Hardcastle, R. Cassano, R. J. van Weeren, T. W. Shimwell, Y. Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Wide-field image of A2255 at 7.1 ′′ × 4.3 ′′ resolution. The noise is σrms = 24 µJy beam−1 and the color scale has a logarithmic stretch from 0.5 to 1500σrms. The radio beam is shown in the bottom left corner. tained from a full calibration run on a single observation, using the best-quality dataset (i.e. SAS ID: 747611), and was adopted as starting model for the joint calibration of the final dataset to s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Wide-field low-resolution image of A2255 obtained with a 15′′-Gaussian taper. The image resolution and noise are 20.7 ′′ × 18.0 ′′ and σrms = 93 µJy beam−1 , respectively. The color scale has a logarithmic stretch from 0.5 to 1500σrms. The radio beam is shown in the bottom left corner. Circles denote different characteristic radii. The main radio sources in the field are labeled following previous literatu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Zoom-in of the complex central region of A2255 at progressively higher resolution. From left to right, images were obtained with robust weighting of the visibilities of −0.5, −1.0, −1.5, and −2.0. The corresponding resolutions (σrms values) are 7.1 ′′ ×4.3 ′′ (24 µJy beam−1 ), 4.9 ′′ ×3.5 ′′ (25 µJy beam−1 ), 4.0 ′′ × 2.8 ′′ (42 µJy beam−1 ), and 3.3 ′′ × 2.2 ′′ (72 µJy beam−1 ). The color scale has a comm… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Images of A2255 with discrete sources subtracted. From left to right, images were smoothed to circular beams of 8′′, 16′′, and 35′′ , achieving noise values of σrms = 30, 59, and 127 µJy beam−1 . The displayed FoVs are 45, 65, and 100 arcmin2 . The color scale has a logarithmic stretch from 0.5 to 1500σrms. The radio beams are shown in the bottom left corners. are preferentially elongated along the local m… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Topology of the magnetic field in A2255. The magnetic field lines inferred by applying the SIG method on the 35′′-resolution image with discrete sources subtracted are visualized on the full-resolution image using the line integral convolution. case defined by 20 pixels × 20 pixels (see Hu et al. 2024), with a Gaussian function and taking the peak value as the most prob￾able gradient direction for that reg… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Magnetic fields inferred in specific regions of A2255. Each (magnetic field) segment represents the SIG, color-coded by its amplitude (see colorbar in the figure), averaged for 8 pixel × 8 pixel for visualization purposes. Histograms show the distribution of gradient angles and amplitudes within the regions defined by the eight polygons. spatial information to trace magnetic field structures without ex￾ces… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative magnetic field orien￾tation (Φ) as a function of projected distance to the cluster center. Differ￾ent colors denote the eight regions of interest discussed in the paper (see legend). Contours enclose the dens￾est 10%, 25%, and 50% of the distri￾bution computed from the 2D kernel density estimate. A dashed horizon￾tal line is drawn at Φ = 45◦ to sepa￾rate the regions of the plot where the magnetic … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Mapping the central region of A2255. Spectral index (S ν ∝ ν −α convention) map between 49 and 145 MHz at 12.5′′ resolution from Botteon et al. (2022b), with contours from the Ultra-Deep Field full-resolution image shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between the magnetic field orientation inferred from polarization (left panel) and from the SIG analysis (right panel) for F1, F2, and F3. Magnetic field segments derived from polarization, cor￾rected for Galactic Faraday rotation, are overlaid on the VLA 1–2 GHz linearly polarized intensity image at 12′′-resolution (Rajpurohit et al., in prep.) and are color-coded by the AM between SIG and pola… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Magnetic field orientation in a cosmological MHD simulation. Segments represent the projected magnetic field along the line-of-sight, weighted by PR, and are overlaid on the projected map of PR (left panel, logarithmic scale in arbitrary units) and on the projected density-weighted gas velocity field (right panel, logarithmic scale of the absolute value in km s−1 units). Blue rounded boxes and green recta… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 218 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The Science of the Einstein Telescope , author =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081 , keywords =. 2503.12263 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Shear-Selected Clusters from the Deep Lens Survey. III. Masses from Weak Lensing , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/603 , keywords =. 0904.2185 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    arXiv e-prints , number =

    CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition , author =. arXiv e-prints , number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1610.02743 , keywords =. 1610.02743 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02743

  4. [4]

    arXiv e-prints , number =

    CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan , author =. arXiv e-prints , number =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1907.04473 , keywords =. 1907.04473 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.04473 1907

  5. [5]

    Astrophys

    Searching for High-Energy Neutrino Emission from Galaxy Clusters with IceCube , author =. Astrophys. J. Lett. , volume =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac966b , keywords =. 2206.02054 , pages =

    arXiv 2041

  6. [6]

    Astrophys

    Constraints on the Correlation of IceCube Neutrinos with a Tracer of Nearby Large-Scale Structure , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae43df , keywords =. 2510.18119 , primaryclass =

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Astrophys

    Constraints on the Thermal Contents of the X-Ray Cavities of Cluster MS 0735.6+7421 with Sunyaev ndash Zel rsquo dovich Effect Observations , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf888 , keywords =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf888

  8. [8]

    Constraints on Axion-like Particles with the Perseus Galaxy Cluster with MAGIC , author =. Phys. Dark Universe , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101425 , keywords =. 2401.07798 , pages =

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Prospects for ensuremath gamma -Ray Observations of the Perseus Galaxy Cluster with the Cherenkov Telescope Array , author =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/004 , keywords =. 2309.03712 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    , author =

    The Distribution of Rich Clusters of Galaxies. , author =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =

  11. [11]

    Clustering of Galaxies , author =. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. , volume =

  12. [12]

    Astrophys

    A Catalog of Rich Clusters of Galaxies , author =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =. doi:10.1086/191333 , keywords =

    doi:10.1086/191333

  13. [13]

    The Simons Observatory: Science Goals and Forecasts for the Enhanced Large Aperture Telescope , author =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/034 , keywords =. 2503.00636 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Astrophys

    The Fourteenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey and from the Second Phase of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment , author =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9e8a , keywords =. 1707.09322 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Parametric Strong Lensing Model of the Galaxy Cluster Abell 2390 from Euclid and MUSE Observations , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556396 , keywords =. 2510.17192 , primaryclass =

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    Non-Thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich Signal from Radio Galaxy Lobes , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab810 , keywords =. 2009.03440 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Critical Magnetic Reynolds Number of the Turbulent Dynamo in Collisionless Plasmas , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3967 , keywords =. 2401.08499 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Astrophys

    GeV Gamma-Ray Flux Upper Limits from Clusters of Galaxies , author =. Astrophys. J. Lett. , volume =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/717/1/L71 , keywords =. 1006.0748 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2041

  19. [19]

    Astrophys

    Search for Cosmic-Ray-Induced Gamma-Ray Emission in Galaxy Clusters , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/18 , keywords =. 1308.5654 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Astrophys

    Search for Gamma-Ray Emission from the Coma Cluster with Six Years of Fermi-LAT Data , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/149 , keywords =. 1507.08995 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Simulations of the Effects of Stripping and Accretion on Galaxy Haloes in Clusters , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06504.x , keywords =. astro-ph/0302322 , pages =

    arXiv 2003

  22. [22]

    High Angular Resolution Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Observations of MACS J1423.8+2404 with NIKA: Multiwavelength Analysis , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527616 , keywords =. 1510.06674 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  23. [23]

    Mapping the Hot Gas Temperature in Galaxy Clusters Using X-Ray and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Imaging , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629810 , keywords =. 1706.10230 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Mapping the Kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect toward MACS J0717.5+3745 with NIKA , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629182 , keywords =. 1606.07721 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    The NIKA2 Large-Field-of-View Millimetre Continuum Camera for the 30 m IRAM Telescope , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731503 , keywords =. 1707.00908 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Substructure and Merger Detection in Resolved NIKA Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Images of Distant Clusters , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731950 , keywords =. 1712.01836 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    MINOT: Modeling the Intracluster Medium (Non-)Thermal Content and Observable Prediction Tools , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039091 , keywords =. 2009.05373 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    ensuremath gamma -Ray Detection toward the Coma Cluster with Fermi-LAT: Implications for the Cosmic Ray Content in the Hadronic Scenario , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039660 , keywords =. 2102.02251 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    The XXL Survey

    Adam, Remi and Ricci, M and Eckert, Dominique and Ade, P and Ajeddig, H and Altieri, B and Andr. The XXL Survey. LI. Pressure Profile and Y\ \_ SZ \ ensuremath -. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348049 , keywords =. 2310.05819 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    PITSZI: Probing Intra-Cluster Medium Turbulence with Sunyaev--Zel'dovich Imaging: Application to the Triple Merging Cluster MACS J0717.5+3745 , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452342 , keywords =. 2409.14804 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    The XXL Survey. XX. The 365 Cluster Catalogue , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731606 , keywords =. 1810.03849 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    First Release of Apertif Imaging Survey Data , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244007 , keywords =. 2208.05348 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Constraints on Axionlike Particles from VERITAS Observations of a Flaring Radio Galaxy in the Perseus Cluster , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. doi:10.1103/jydc-npy6 , keywords =. 2510.19010 , primaryclass =

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Astrophys

    Effective Viscosity in the Intracluster Medium during Magnetic Field Amplification via Turbulent Dynamo , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addc5f , keywords =. 2506.12221 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    The Simons Observatory: Science Goals and Forecasts , author =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056 , keywords =. 1808.07445 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Apercal-The Apertif Calibration Pipeline , author =. Astron. Comput. , volume =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100514 , keywords =. 2112.03722 , pages =

    arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Splashback in Accreting Dark Matter Halos , author =. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. , volume =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/11/019 , keywords =. 1409.4482 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  38. [38]

    Astrophys

    The R2D2 Deep Neural Network Series Paradigm for Fast Precision Imaging in Radio Astronomy , author =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad46f5 , keywords =. 2403.05452 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Astrophys

    Toward a Robust R2D2 Paradigm for Radio-Interferometric Imaging: Revisiting Deep Neural Network Training and Architecture , author =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adfbed , keywords =. 2503.02554 , primaryclass =

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Statistical Quality Assessment of SZ Detections , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424963 , keywords =. 1409.6543 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    PACT. I. Combining ACT and Planck Data for Improved Extraction of tSZ Signal , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935271 , keywords =. 1902.00350 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  42. [42]

    Dissecting a Miniature Universe: A Multi-Wavelength View of Galaxy Quenching in the Shapley Supercluster , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348672 , keywords =. 2402.18455 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Optical Validation and Characterization of Planck PSZ2 Sources at the Canary Islands Observatories. II. Second Year of LP15 Observations , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936034 , keywords =. 1909.06235 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  44. [44]

    Calibrating the M\ \_ SZ \ ensuremath -

    Velocity Dispersion and Dynamical Masses for 388 Galaxy Clusters and Groups. Calibrating the M\ \_ SZ \ ensuremath -. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039980 , keywords =. 2111.13071 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    The WaZP Galaxy Cluster Sample of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab264 , keywords =. 2008.08711 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters Catalog , author =. Open J. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.33232/001c.155863 , keywords =. 2507.21459 , primaryclass =

    arXiv

  47. [47]

    A Study of Catalogued Nearby Galaxy Clusters in the SDSS-DR4. I. Cluster Global Properties , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066478 , keywords =. 0704.1579 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    A Study of Catalogued Nearby Galaxy Clusters in the SDSS-DR4. II. Cluster Substructure , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913901 , keywords =. 1007.3497 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Aguerri, J. A. Deep Spectroscopy in Nearby Galaxy Clusters ndash. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. 1703.00740 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    The Quench of the Star Formation in Galaxies in the Infall Region of Abell 85 , author =

    Deep Spectroscopy of Nearby Galaxy Clusters - IV. The Quench of the Star Formation in Galaxies in the Infall Region of Abell 85 , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty692 , keywords =. 1803.03045 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Dynamical Analysis of Clusters of Galaxies from Cosmological Simulations , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140326 , keywords =. 2105.09126 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Angular, Spectral, and Time Distributions of Highest Energy Protons and Associated Secondary Gamma Rays and Neutrinos Propagating through Extragalactic Magnetic and Radiation Fields , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.043002 , keywords =. 1006.1045 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [53]

    Astrophys

    The Tenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Spectroscopic Data from the SDSS-III Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment , author =. Astrophys. J. Suppl. , volume =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/211/2/17 , keywords =. 1307.7735 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Astrophys

    Substructures within Substructures in the Complex Postmerging System A514 Unveiled by High-Resolution Magellan/Megacam Weak Lensing , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad65dc , keywords =. 2404.04321 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    PSZ2 G181.06+48.47. III. Weak-Lensing Analysis and Merging Scenario Reconstruction of a Low-Mass Cluster with Exceptionally Distant Radio Relics , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adbc99 , keywords =. 2501.09067 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Ahnen, M. L. and Ansoldi, S and Antonelli, L. A. and Antoranz, P and Babi. Deep Observation of the NGC 1275 Region with MAGIC: Search of Diffuse \. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527846 , keywords =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527846

  57. [57]

    Astrophys

    On Integral Upper Limits Assuming Power-Law Spectra and the Sensitivity in High-Energy Astronomy , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5b97 , keywords =. 1701.06048 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Astrophys

    Galaxy Clusters in the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope Era: Hard X-Rays in the Intracluster Medium , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/367 , keywords =. 0809.0006 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    Non-Equilibrium Ionization State and Two-Temperature Structure in the Linked Region of Abell 399 and Abell 401 , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. 0805.2453 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Hydrodynamic Simulations of Merging Galaxy Clusters: Non-Equilibrium Ionization State and Two-Temperature Structure , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/62.2.335 , keywords =. 0909.5025 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Astrophys

    Fast Radio Bursts as Probes of Magnetic Fields in the Intergalactic Medium , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/824/2/105 , keywords =. 1602.03235 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    ATCA 16 Cm Observation of CIZA J1358.9-4750: Implication of Merger Stage and Constraint on Non-Thermal Properties , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psy042 , keywords =

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psy042

  63. [63]

    Cosmic Magnetism in Centimeter- and Meter-Wavelength Radio Astronomy , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psx123 , keywords =. 1709.02072 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    Galaxies , volume =

    Strategy to Explore Magnetized Cosmic Web with Forthcoming Large Surveys of Rotation Measure , author =. Galaxies , volume =

  65. [65]

    Optimum Frequency of Faraday Tomography to Explore the Intergalactic Magnetic Field in Filaments of Galaxies , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psy124 , keywords =. 1808.10546 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    Discovery of Radio Jets in the Phoenix Galaxy Cluster Center , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa039 , keywords =. 2004.05724 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    X-Ray Study of the Outer Region of Abell 2142 with Suzaku , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/63.sp3.S1019 , keywords =. 1106.5653 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [68]

    X-Ray View of the Shock Front in the Merging Cluster Abell 3376 with Suzaku , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/64.4.67 , keywords =. 1112.5955 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Properties of the Intracluster Medium of Abell 3667 Observed with Suzaku XIS , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/64.3.49 , keywords =. 1111.5162 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Suzaku X-Ray Observations of the Accreting NGC 4839 Group of Galaxies and a Radio Relic in the Coma Cluster , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/65.4.89 , keywords =. 1302.2907 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    Systematic X-Ray Analysis of Radio Relic Clusters with Suzaku , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. , volume =. doi:10.1093/pasj/65.1.16 , keywords =. 1112.3030 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Suzaku X-Ray Study of the Double Radio Relic Galaxy Cluster CIZA J2242.8+5301 , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425209 , keywords =. 1507.02285 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Suzaku and XMM-Newton Observations of the Newly Discovered Early-Stage Cluster Merger of

    Akamatsu, Hiroki and Gu, Liyi and Shimwell, Timothy W and Mernier, Fran. Suzaku and XMM-Newton Observations of the Newly Discovered Early-Stage Cluster Merger of. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629275 , keywords =. 1608.01669 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [74]

    Suzaku Observations of the Merging Galaxy Cluster Abell 2255: The Northeast Radio Relic , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628400 , keywords =. 1612.03058 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [75]

    Properties of the Cosmological Filament between Two Clusters: A Possible Detection of a Large-Scale Accretion Shock by Suzaku , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730497 , keywords =. 1704.05843 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    Astrophys

    Linear Regression for Astronomical Data with Measurement Errors and Intrinsic Scatter , author =. Astrophys. J. , volume =. doi:10.1086/177901 , keywords =. astro-ph/9605002 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    An Expanded Catalogue of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies in the Coma Cluster Using Subaru/Suprime-Cam , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1763 , keywords =. 2006.10043 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [78]

    A Catalogue of Complex Radio Sources in the Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey Created Using a Self-Organising Map , author =. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. , volume =. doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.133 , keywords =. 2412.10183 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Origin of the 150 Kpc Radio Filament in Galaxy ESO 137-006 , author =. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1266 , keywords =. 2507.23026 , primaryclass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Complex Diffuse Emission in the z = 0.52 Cluster PLCK G004.5-19.5 , author =. Astron. Astrophys. , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730496 , keywords =. 1708.00789 , pages =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.