Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Second-Order Optical Nonlinearity of AlScN Films Grown By Molecular Beam Epitaxy

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MBE-grown AlScN films show a d31 of up to 4.92 pm/V, about 60 times AlN, with d33 suppressed.

desk verdict A clean SHG experiment whose headline 60x d31 claim rides on a tensor that silently sets d15=d31 — the fix is straightforward and the data set is worth keeping. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14590 v1 pith:FS3XBRTR submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Joongwon Lee , Thai-Son Nguyen , Len van Deurzen , Debaditya Bhattacharya , Chandrashekhar Savant , Siddhartha Ghosh , Patrick Shea , Carl Bernard
show 3 more authors
Huili Grace Xing Debdeep Jena Farhan Rana
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 42.65.Ky
keywords AlScNsecondharmonicgenerationd31coefficientmolecularbeamepitaxywurtzitetransfermatrixmethodnonlinearopticsnitridephotonics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper measures the second-order optical nonlinearity of AlScN films grown directly on nitrided sapphire by molecular beam epitaxy, using angle-resolved transmission second-harmonic generation. It reports that the in-plane d31 coefficient increases sharply with scandium content, reaching about 5 pm/V at 20% Sc, while the longitudinal d33 coefficient stays near zero. The direct-growth method is designed to isolate the AlScN response from any buffer-layer contributions. If correct, this large d31 would make AlScN a viable material for on-chip nonlinear photonics and would help resolve conflicting reports between sputtered and MBE-grown films.

What carries the argument

The wurtzite (P63mc) second-order susceptibility tensor, with its contracted d-coefficients d31 and d33, combined with a transfer-matrix model that computes the pump field distribution inside the film, treats the nonlinear polarization as local sheet sources, and propagates the generated harmonic field to the substrate and detector. A central element is the screening factor 1/εzz in the source discontinuity for the transverse electric field, which suppresses out-of-plane (Pz) radiation and makes the measurement far more sensitive to the in-plane coefficient than to d33.

What would settle it

Measure the SHG for a p-polarized pump while detecting only the x-polarized harmonic component, and separately extract d15 and d31 from geometries that isolate each coefficient. If d15 and d31 differ by more than the reported fit uncertainties, the paper's tensor assignment and its d31 value are incorrect.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in wurtzite AlScN grown by MBE, the coefficient d31 is enhanced roughly 60-fold relative to AlN, peaking at about 4.9 pm/V for 20% scandium, whereas d33 remains suppressed within a large uncertainty. This is inferred from the angular dependence of the p- and s-polarized pump SHG signals, matched by transfer-matrix simulations that account for multilayer reflectance and the strong longitudinal dielectric screening in the high-index film. The authors argue that because the films are grown directly on nitrided sapphire, the measured response is intrinsic to AlScN rather than an artifact of a thick AlN buffer.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor model in Eq. (1) assumes the shear coefficient d15 equals d31; if they are independent, the extracted 'd31' is a biased mixture of the two and the claimed 60-fold enhancement is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • AlScN films could provide a strong effective nonlinearity for integrated photonics even if d33 is small, since the in-plane coefficient is large.
  • The d31 peak near 20% scandium suggests a composition sweet spot for device design before crystalline quality degrades.
  • Direct growth on nitrided sapphire offers a clean platform for characterizing the intrinsic nonlinearity of other nitride alloys.
  • The transfer-matrix analysis can serve as a rapid metrology method for optically characterizing transparent epitaxial nonlinear films.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In strict wurtzite 6mm symmetry, the p-polarized pump response in the x-z plane is governed by d15, not d31; the paper's tensor model implicitly assumes d15 = d31, so the reported 'd31' enhancement may actually be a d15 enhancement, which would change which waveguide geometries benefit.
  • The apparent suppression of d33 could be partly a measurement-geometry effect; a normal-incidence or reflection-geometry SHG experiment with greater sensitivity to the out-of-plane polarization could either confirm the suppression or reveal a residual d33.
  • If the drop in d31 at 25% Sc is caused by strain relaxation through crack formation, then strain-engineering or lattice-matched substrates could extend the enhancement to higher scandium fractions than the paper observed.
  • The stark contrast with sputtered-film results reporting d33 up to 62 pm/V may stem from the analysis method: the TMM explicitly accounts for longitudinal screening, which simpler ray-optic fits could miss, potentially overestimating d33.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports angle-resolved transmission SHG measurements on MBE-grown AlScN films (10–25% Sc) deposited directly on nitrided c-plane sapphire, with ellipsometric and XRD/RHEED characterization. Using a transfer-matrix model for a P6_3mc (wurtzite) film on sapphire, the authors extract d31 and d33 as functions of Sc content, reporting d31 ≈ 4.9 pm/V at 20% Sc — about 60× the AlN value — while d33 appears suppressed. The paper argues that omitting a thick AlN buffer isolates the AlScN response and contrasts its findings with prior sputtered-film results reporting large d33.

Significance. If the extracted d31 enhancement is correct, the result would be significant for integrated nonlinear photonics on nitride platforms, and the direct-growth methodology would offer a cleaner route to measuring the intrinsic response of AlScN. The paper is also useful in that it provides a full tensor extraction and quantifies confidence intervals for d33, a step beyond many prior reports. The manuscript is clearly written and the experimental dataset appears carefully acquired; the transfer-matrix treatment of the layered SHG problem is a standard and appropriate framework.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eqs. (1)–(2) and Fig. 3] The SHG model in Eq. (1) sets the (x,z) and (z,x) shear tensor elements equal to d31. In 6mm symmetry these elements are d15, which is independent of d31. The manuscript offers no justification for d15 = d31, and the cited AlN literature values for d15 (≈3.6 pm/V) and d31 (≈0.08 pm/V) differ by orders of magnitude. Because the p-polarized SHG is more than ten times stronger than the s-polarized signal (Fig. 3), the p-pump data are dominated by the shear coefficient. Setting d15 = d31 in the fit therefore misattributes the large shear response to d31. The headline claim 'd31 as high as 4.92 pm/V' is thus not established by this analysis. The authors should either (i) include d15 as a separate free parameter and report its confidence interval, or (ii) explicitly invoke and justify a Kleinman-symmetry condition with a stated uncertainty, or (iii) reframe the claim as an effective shear-rela
  2. [Sec. 'To calibrate the experimental setup...' and Table I] The AlN calibration uses literature d31 = 0.08 pm/V and d33 = 5.1 pm/V, but then says the 'd31/d33 ratio slightly adjusted to optimize the fit to our baseline data.' This adjusted ratio is not reported, nor is the resulting set of AlN coefficients. If the ratio change is large (e.g., if d31 is adjusted upward relative to d33), the calibration itself would partly determine the magnitude of the extracted d31 values. The dependence of the final d31 values on this calibration choice must be stated, and the actual AlN fit parameters should be listed.
  3. [Sec. 'Fig. 4' and Table I, 20% Sc row] The claim that d33 'appears suppressed' is not supported by the fit. For the 20% sample, the 95% CI spans -8.85 to 2.66 pm/V, which includes the AlN value of 5.1 pm/V (and certainly includes d33 ≈ 0). The statement in the text that 'a significant enhancement in d33 would still have been captured' is not quantitatively backed; given the elongated MSE contour in Fig. 4(c), a large positive d33 cannot be excluded at 95% confidence. The paper should downgrade the d33 suppression claim to 'not measurable in this geometry with the present precision.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 2(b)] The sentence in the Results section describing the 10% film's refractive index appears incomplete: 'For the 10% film, no increases from 2.16 at 1600 nm to 2.4 at 300 nm.' This should be rewritten, e.g., 'For the 10% film, n_o increases from 2.16 at 1600 nm to 2.4 at 300 nm.'
  2. [Eq. (4)] The notation SE for the electric-field discontinuity could be confused with the time-averaged Poynting vector; suggest using ΔE_x or similar. Also, the sign convention for kx should be defined.
  3. [Fig. 3 inset] The inset axes labels ('p' and 's') are not defined clearly in the caption; specify whether the inset shows the detected polarization angle or the analyzer angle.
  4. [References] Ref. [21] is cited as 'V. Yoshioka et al.' but the author list includes 'J. Jin, R. H. O. III, and B. Zhen'; please verify the author names are complete.
  5. [Sec. 'The AlScN samples...'] The text states 'The lowest RMS roughness of 0.353 nm' and later Fig. 1(b) caption says '3.53 nm RMS' — there is a factor-of-ten inconsistency. Check whether the RMS is 0.353 nm or 3.53 nm.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SHG coefficients are inverse fits, calibrated against external AlN data; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central SHG result is a standard inverse fit: measured p- and s-pump SHG angular data are compared to TMM simulations, and d31/d33 are chosen to minimize MSE. This is not circular because the data are independent of the fitted parameters. The AlN (0%) control is calibrated against external literature values (Refs. 21,35-37), and the AlScN values are then extracted from the same procedure; no fitted AlScN parameter is fed back as an input. Although the tensor in Eq. (1) places d31 in shear positions where P6_3mc symmetry would normally require the independent coefficient d15, and although p-pump SHG is much stronger than s-pump SHG, this is a modeling/correctness concern about whether the extracted coefficient is really conventional d31; it is not a circular derivation. Similarly, the paper itself acknowledges limited ellipsometric sensitivity to n_e and the broad 95% CI for d33 (-8.85 to 2.66 pm/V); these are limitations, not circularity. Multiple citations to the authors' prior work appear (e.g., Refs. 15,16,19,20,24,29) but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the source of the SHG tensor; the central claim is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unstated equality d15=d31 that is almost certainly false for wurtzite nitrides, plus poorly constrained linear optical parameters (thickness, n_e) that feed the TMM. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • d15 (shear coefficient) = assumed equal to fitted d31
    Eq. (1) places d31 in the shear positions, so d15 is implicitly set equal to d31. This is a free/unjustified equality that controls the p-polarized pump fit.
  • AlN calibration d31/d33 ratio = 0.08/5.1 pm/V adjusted to optimize fit
    The text says 'with the d31/d33 ratio slightly adjusted to optimize the fit to our baseline data.' This tuning affects the absolute scale of all extracted coefficients.
  • Extraordinary refractive index n_e = not given per wavelength; stated to have limited sensitivity
    Ellipsometry has limited sensitivity to n_e; the paper notes it 'precludes a reliable assessment of n_e scaling.' n_e enters the TMM via ε_zz, so poor knowledge of n_e propagates into d33.
  • Film thickness = 136, 145, 133, 170 nm for 10/15/20/25%
    Thicknesses are fit from ellipsometry; no errors given; thickness enters the TMM phase matching and affects both d31 and d33.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AlScN films have wurtzite P6_3mc symmetry with only d31 and d33 contributing (d15=0 or d15=d31).
    Eq. (1)-(2) define the tensor; no justification is given for omitting or equating d15.
  • domain assumption Films are uniform and single-phase over the ~50 µm laser spot.
    AFM and XRD show roughness and phase degradation at higher Sc, yet the TMM assumes a single uniform layer.
  • domain assumption Sapphire substrate can be treated as semi-infinite for SHG.
    Section TMM: 'the substrate is treated as a semi-infinite medium as its thickness exceeds the coherence length.' This neglects backside reflections despite the polished back surface.
  • domain assumption The pump and SHG wavelengths are in the transparent regime with no absorption.
    Bandgap measurements support this for the 1032 nm pump and 516 nm SHG, but no absorption coefficient values are given.
  • standard math The linear TMM correctly computes the internal pump field with the measured n_o and n_e.
    The analysis relies on linear transfer matrix methods; standard but requires accurate indices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Second-Order Optical Nonlinearity of AlScN Films Grown By Molecular Beam Epitaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FS3XBRTR

@misc{pith2026260714590,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Second-Order Optical Nonlinearity of AlScN Films Grown By Molecular Beam Epitaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FS3XBRTR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14590}
}
read the original abstract

Alloys of AlN have rapidly emerged as a material platform for nonlinear optics. In this paper, we measure the second-order optical nonlinearity of AlScN films grown directly on nitrided c-plane sapphire by molecular beam epitaxy. This direct growth approach, which bypasses a thick AlN buffer layer, allows us to isolate the true nonlinear response of the AlScN film. Our results show a large enhancement of d31, but a suppression of d33 in AlScN films compared to AlN. We observe that d31 can be as high as 4.92 pm/V , which is 60 times larger than that of AlN. The development of AlScN-based photonic devices can enable energy-efficient nonlinear optical operations that can be epitaxially integrated with electronic and photonic devices based on Si, GaN and AlN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14590 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Heterostructure schematic of MBE-grown-AlScN films on nitrided sapphire. (b) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) scan of an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Dispersion (ordinary and extraordinary refractive index) measured by ellipsometry, and (b) Tauc plots measured for the 10%, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Experimental scheme depicting the optical setup geometry for the SHG measurements. (b), (c) Measured p-polarized SHG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Schematic describing the transfer matrix method (TMM) simulations. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [22]

    and Bhardwaj, Manish and Weimann, Nils G

    Chowdhury, Aref and Ng, Hock M. and Bhardwaj, Manish and Weimann, Nils G. , title = ". Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1599044 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1599044 2003

  2. [1]

    Silicon Photonics , year=

    Jalali, Bahram and Fathpour, Sasan , journal=. Silicon Photonics , year=

  3. [2]

    and Koos, C

    Leuthold, J. and Koos, C. and Freud, W. , journal=. Nonlinear silicon photonics , year=

  4. [3]

    Review of Silicon Photonics Foundry Efforts , year=

    Lim, Andy Eu-Jin and Song, Junfeng and Fang, Qing and Li, Chao and Tu, Xiaoguang and Duan, Ning and Chen, Kok Kiong and Tern, Roger Poh-Cher and Liow, Tsung-Yang , journal=. Review of Silicon Photonics Foundry Efforts , year=

  5. [4]

    Science , volume =

    Andreas Boes and Lin Chang and Carsten Langrock and Mengjie Yu and Mian Zhang and Qiang Lin and Marko Lončar and Martin Fejer and John Bowers and Arnan Mitchell , title =. Science , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  6. [5]

    doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab147b , url =

    Debdeep Jena and Ryan Page and Joseph Casamento and Phillip Dang and Jashan Singhal and Zexuan Zhang and John Wright and Guru Khalsa and Yongjin Cho and Huili Grace Xing , title =. doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab147b , url =

    work page doi:10.7567/1347-4065/ab147b

  7. [6]

    Redwing and Eric A

    Kwan-Ho Kim and Seong Oh and Merrilyn Mercy Adzo Flagbenu and Jeffrey Zheng and Pariasadat Musavigharavi and Pawan Kumar and Nicholas Trainor and Areej Aljarb and Yi Wan and Hyong Min Kim and Keshava Katti and Seunguk Song and Gwangwoo Kim and Zichen Tang and Jui-Han Fu and Mariam Hakami and Vincent Tung and Joan M. Redwing and Eric A. Stach and Roy H. Ol...

  8. [7]

    Van de Walle and Amit Lal and Huili (Grace) Xing and Debdeep Jena , title=

    Joseph Casamento and Hyunjea Lee and Takuya Maeda and Ved Gund and Kazuki Nomoto and Len van Deurzen and Wesley Turner and Patrick Fay and Sai Mu and Chris G. Van de Walle and Amit Lal and Huili (Grace) Xing and Debdeep Jena , title=. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year=

Show all 66 references
  1. [8]

    Morito Akiyama and Kazuhiko Kano and Akihiko Teshigahara , title=. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year=

  2. [9]

    Morito Akiyama and Toshihiro Kamohara and Kazuhiko Kano and Akihiko Teshigahara and Yukihiro Takeuchi and Nobuaki Kawahara , title=. Adv. Mater. , year=

  3. [10]

    Simon Fichtner and Niklas Wolff and Fabian Lofink and Lorenz Kienle and Bernhard Wagner , title=. J. Appl. Phys. , year=

  4. [11]

    Olsson III and Bo Zhen , title=

    Valerie Yoshioka and Jian Lu and Zichen Tang and Jicheng Jin and Roy H. Olsson III and Bo Zhen , title=. APL Mater. , year=

  5. [12]

    Kelley and Yihuang Xiong and Benazir Fazlioglu-Yalcin and Ismaila Dabo and Susan Trolier-McKinstry and Jon-Paul Maria and Venkatraman Gopalan , title=

    Albert Suceava and John Hayden and Kyle P. Kelley and Yihuang Xiong and Benazir Fazlioglu-Yalcin and Ismaila Dabo and Susan Trolier-McKinstry and Jon-Paul Maria and Venkatraman Gopalan , title=. Opt. Mater. Express , year=

  6. [13]

    van Deurzen and T.-S

    L. van Deurzen and T.-S. Nguyen and J. Casamento and H. G. Xing and D. Jena , title=. Appl. Phys. Lett. , year=

  7. [14]

    Bloembergen and P

    N. Bloembergen and P. S. Pershan , title=. Phys. Rev. , year=

  8. [15]

    G. T. Kiehne and G. K. L Wong and J. B. Ketterson , title=. J. Appl. Phys. , year=

  9. [16]

    Miragliotta and D

    J. Miragliotta and D. K. Wickenden and T. J. Kistenmacher and W. A. Bryden , title=. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B , year=

  10. [17]

    Analysis of silicon nitride partial

    Florian Vogelbacher and Stefan Nevlacsil and Martin Sagmeister and Jochen Kraft and Karl Unterrainer and Rainer Hainberger , journal =. Analysis of silicon nitride partial. 2019 , url =

    2019

  11. [18]

    S. C. Mao and S. H. Tao and Y. L. Xu and X. W. Sun and M. B. Yu and G. Q. Lo and D. L. Kwong , journal =. Low propagation loss. 2008 , url =

    2008

  12. [19]

    Bruch and Zheng Gong and Juanjuan Lu and Joshua B

    Xianwen Liu and Alexander W. Bruch and Zheng Gong and Juanjuan Lu and Joshua B. Surya and Liang Zhang and Junxi Wang and Jianchang Yan and Hong X. Tang , journal =. 2018 , url =

    2018

  13. [20]

    Pernice, W. H. P. and Xiong, C. and Schuck, C. and Tang, H. X. , title = ". Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4722941 , url =

    2012 doi

  14. [21]

    Nonlinear electroreflectance from gallium nitride using optical second-harmonic generation , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.53.1388 , url =

    1996 doi

  15. [23]

    Bierlein , journal =

    Herman Vanherzeele and John D. Bierlein , journal =. Magnitude of the nonlinear-optical coefficients of. 1992 , url =

    1992

  16. [24]

    Skauli and K

    T. Skauli and K. L. Vodopyanov and T. J. Pinguet and A. Schober and O. Levi and L. A. Eyres and M. M. Fejer and J. S. Harris and B. Gerard and L. Becouarn and E. Lallier and G. Arisholm , journal =. Measurement of the nonlinear coefficient of orientation-patterned GaAs and dem...

    2002

  17. [25]

    and Nordland, William A

    Miller, Robert C. and Nordland, William A. and Bridenbaugh, Paul M. , title = ". Journal of Applied Physics , volume =. 1971 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1659746 , url =

    1971 doi

  18. [26]

    Boyd, G. D. and Miller, Robert C. and Nassau, K. and Bond, W. L. and Savage, A. , title = ". Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 1964 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1723604 , url =

    1964 doi

  19. [27]

    Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients , volume =

    Ichiro Shoji and Takashi Kondo and Ayako Kitamoto and Masayuki Shirane and Ryoichi Ito , journal =. Absolute scale of second-order nonlinear-optical coefficients , volume =. 1997 , url =

    1997

  20. [28]

    Recent development of nonlinear optical borate crystals: key materials for generation of visible and

    Takatomo Sasaki and Yusuke Mori and Masashi Yoshimura and Yoke Khin Yap and Tomosumi Kamimura , keywords =. Recent development of nonlinear optical borate crystals: key materials for generation of visible and. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports , volume =. 2000 , is...

    doi

  21. [29]

    Accurate measurements of second-order nonlinear optical coefficients of

    Hiroaki Sato and Makoto Abe and Ichiro Shoji and Jun Suda and Takashi Kondo , journal =. Accurate measurements of second-order nonlinear optical coefficients of. 2009 , url =

    2009

  22. [31]

    Journal of Applied Physics , author =

    Role of sapphire nitridation temperature on. Journal of Applied Physics , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1435834 , number =

    2002 doi

  23. [32]

    APL Materials , author =

    Lattice-matched multiple channel. APL Materials , author =. 2024 , pages =

    2024

  24. [33]

    Applied Physics Letters , author =

    Epitaxial. Applied Physics Letters , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4981807 , number =

    2017 doi

  25. [34]

    Journal of Crystal Growth , author =

    Pulsed laser deposition of epitaxial. Journal of Crystal Growth , author =. 1997 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0022-0248(96)00284-9 , number =

    1997 doi

  26. [35]

    Applied Physics Letters , author =

    Molecular beam epitaxy and characterization of wurtzite. Applied Physics Letters , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0002445 , number =

    2020 doi

  27. [36]

    Control of phase purity in high scandium fraction heteroepitaxial. Appl. Phys. Express , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.35848/1882-0786/ab916a , number =

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    Applied Physics Letters , author =

    Structural and piezoelectric properties of ultra-thin. Applied Physics Letters , author =. 2020 , pages =

    2020

  29. [38]

    Journal of Applied Physics , author =

    Thermal stress in. Journal of Applied Physics , author =. 1995 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.359465 , number =

    1995 doi

  30. [39]

    Journal of Crystal Growth , author =

    Growth of high-quality and crack free. Journal of Crystal Growth , author =. 2007 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.10.123 , urldate =

    2007 doi

  31. [40]

    Applied Physics Letters , author =

    Domain control and periodic poling of epitaxial. Applied Physics Letters , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0156514 , number =

    2023 doi

  32. [41]

    Unveiling the Pockels coefficient of ferroelectric nitride. Nat. Comm. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53895-x , number =

    2024 doi

  33. [42]

    2021 , month =

    Austin Lee Hickman and Reet Chaudhuri and Samuel James Bader and Kazuki Nomoto and Lei Li and James C M Hwang and Huili Grace Xing and Debdeep Jena , title =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6641/abe5fd , url =

    2021 doi

  34. [43]

    The study of structure evolvement of

    Fei Yang and Lei Wang and Ling Huang and Guohong Zou , keywords =. The study of structure evolvement of. Coordination Chemistry Reviews , volume =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213491 , url =

    2020

  35. [44]

    Zanatta , keywords =

    A.R. Zanatta , keywords =. The optical bandgap of lithium niobate (. Results in Physics , volume =. 2022 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105736 , url =

    2022

  36. [45]

    French, R. H. and Ling, J. W. and Ohuchi, F. S. and Chen, C. T. , journal =. Electronic structure of. 1991 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.8496 , url =

    1991 doi

  37. [46]

    Larciprete, M. C. and Bosco, A. and Belardini, A. and Li Voti, R. and Leahu, G. and Sibilia, C. and Fazio, E. and Ostuni, R. and Bertolotti, M. and Passaseo, A. and Potì, B. and Del Prete, Z. , title =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.22191...

    2006 doi

  38. [47]

    physica status solidi (b) , volume =

    Majkić, Aleksej and Franke, Alexander and Kirste, Ronny and Schlesser, Raoul and Collazo, Ramón and Sitar, Zlatko and Zgonik, Marko , title =. physica status solidi (b) , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201700077 , url =

    doi

  39. [48]

    and Yoshida, S

    Fujii, Y. and Yoshida, S. and Misawa, S. and Maekawa, S. and Sakudo, T. , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 1977 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.89550 , url =

    1977 doi

  40. [49]

    , title =

    Wang, Haochen and Adamski, Nicholas and Mu, Sai and Van de Walle, Chris G. , title =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0056485 , url =

    2021 doi

  41. [50]

    Advanced Electronic Materials , volume =

    Wang, Ding and Wang, Ping and Mondal, Shubham and Mohanty, Subhajit and Ma, Tao and Ahmadi, Elaheh and Mi, Zetian , title =. Advanced Electronic Materials , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202200005 , url =

    doi

  42. [51]

    Applied Physics Letters , volume =

    Savant, Chandrashekhar and Gund, Ved and Nomoto, Kazuki and Maeda, Takuya and Jadhav, Shubham and Lee, Joongwon and Ramesh, Madhav and Kim, Eungkyun and Nguyen, Thai-Son and Chen, Yu-Hsin and Casamento, Joseph and Rana, Farhan and Lal, Amit and Xing, Huili Grace and Jena, Debd...

    2024 doi

  43. [52]

    and Xing, Huili Grace and Jena, Debdeep , title =

    Savant, Chandrashekhar and Nguyen, Thai-Son and Vishwakarma, Saurabh and Lee, Joongwon and Ithepalli, Anand and Chen, Yu-Hsin and Nomoto, Kazuki and Rana, Farhan and Smith, David J. and Xing, Huili Grace and Jena, Debdeep , title =. physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research...

    doi

  44. [53]

    and Meng, W

    Zhang, Xiaoman and Stach, Eric A. and Meng, W. J. and Meng, Andrew C. Nanoscale compositional segregation in epitaxial AlScN on Si (111). Nanoscale Horiz. 2023. doi:10.1039/D2NH00567K

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    Epitaxial

    Casamento, Joseph and Lee, Hyunjea and Maeda, Takuya and Gund, Ved and Nomoto, Kazuki and van Deurzen, Len and Turner, Wesley and Fay, Patrick and Mu, Sai and Van de Walle, Chris G and others , journal=. Epitaxial. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  46. [55]

    Physical Review Materials , volume=

    Ferroelectricity in boron-substituted aluminum nitride thin films , author=. Physical Review Materials , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  47. [56]

    Optical Materials Express , volume=

    Enhancement of second-order optical nonlinearities and nanoscale periodic domain patterning in ferroelectric boron-substituted aluminum nitride thin films , author=. Optical Materials Express , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  48. [57]

    2023 , organization=

    Casamento, Joseph and Nomoto, Kazuki and Nguyen, Thai-Son and Lee, Hyunjea and Savant, Chandrasekhar and Li, Lei and Hickman, Austin and Maeda, Takuya and Shao, Yu-Tsun and Encomendero, Jimy and others , booktitle=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  49. [58]

    2022 , organization=

    Casamento, J and Nomoto, K and Nguyen, TS and Lee, H and Savant, C and Li, L and Hickman, A and Maeda, T and Encomendero, J and Gund, V and others , booktitle=. 2022 , organization=

    2022

  50. [59]

    , title =

    Wang, Haochen and Mu, Sai and Van de Walle, Chris G. , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0244434 , url =

    2025 doi

  51. [60]

    2024 , url =

    Kewei Bian and Zhenyu Li and Yushuai Liu and Sumei Xu and Xingyan Zhao and Yang Qiu and Yuan Dong and Qize Zhong and Tao Wu and Shaonan Zheng and Ting Hu , journal =. 2024 , url =

    2024

  52. [61]

    Nanophotonics , doi =

    , author =. Nanophotonics , doi =. 2024 , lastchecked =

    2024

  53. [62]

    Journal of Applied Physics , volume =

    Baeumler, Martina and Lu, Yuan and Kurz, Nicolas and Kirste, Lutz and Prescher, Mario and Christoph, Tim and Wagner, Joachim and Žukauskaitė, Agnė and Ambacher, Oliver , title =. Journal of Applied Physics , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.5101043 , url =

    2019 doi

  54. [63]

    The effect of boron incorporation on leakage and wake-up in ferroelectric

    Gremmel, Maike and Savant, Chandrashekhar Prakash and Bhattacharya, Debaditya and Sch. The effect of boron incorporation on leakage and wake-up in ferroelectric. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08399 , year=

  55. [64]

    Epitaxial high-

    Savant, Chandrashekhar and Nguyen, Thai-Son and Nomoto, Kazuki and Vishwakarma, Saurabh and Ma, Siyuan and Dhar, Akshey and Chen, Yu-Hsin and Casamento, Joseph and Smith, David J and Xing, Huili Grace and others , journal=. Epitaxial high-. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  56. [65]

    D. S. Bethune , journal =. Optical harmonic generation and mixing in multilayer media: analysis using optical transfer matrix techniques , volume =. 1989 , url =. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.6.000910 , abstract =

    1989 doi

  57. [66]

    and Kira, Mackillo and Kéna-Cohen, Stéphane and Mi, Zetian , title =

    Thériault, Pierre-Luc and Liu, Jiangnan and Wang, Haochen and Florian, Matthias and Yu, Huabin and Tanim, Md Mehedi Hasan and Wu, You and Van de Walle, Chris G. and Kira, Mackillo and Kéna-Cohen, Stéphane and Mi, Zetian , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =. 2026 , month =

    2026

  58. [67]

    and Tang, Hong X

    Yang, Guangcanlan and Wang, Haochen and Mu, Sai and Xie, Hao and Wang, Tyler and He, Chengxing and Shen, Mohan and Liu, Mengxia and Van de Walle, Chris G. and Tang, Hong X. , title =. Nature Communications , volume =. 2024 , url =

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.