Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Spot Profile Analysis Low Energy Electron Diffraction of Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition Grown Epitaxial Few-Layer Graphene on Sapphire

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The authors show that spot-profile analysis of LEED can measure the few-nanometer grain size of PECVD graphene on sapphire, giving 3.7 nm as-grown and up to 6.8 nm after annealing, establishing SPA-LEED as a quantitative tool for directly g

desk verdict Useful, plausible SPA-LEED data on PECVD graphene on sapphire, but the grain sizes rest on an unseparated substrate contribution to the (00) spot; the reader's 'order-of-magnitude' contradiction does not survive checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.14922 v1 pith:CSXYPOJ7 submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Niels Ganser , Marko A. Kriegel , Umut Kaya , Jixi Zhang , Rodney D. L. Smith , Marika Schleberger , Wolfgang Mertin , Gerd Bacher
show 1 more author
Michael Horn-von Hoegen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph PACS 61.05.jh68.65.Pq81.15.Gh
keywords graphenesapphirePECVDSPA-LEEDspotprofileanalysisfinite-sizebroadeninggrainsizelow-energyelectrondiffraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper demonstrates that high-resolution spot-profile analysis low-energy electron diffraction (SPA-LEED) can quantify the mean lateral grain size of few-layer graphene grown directly by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) on sapphire. By fitting the finite-size broadening of the specular (00) spot with an Airy-type diffraction profile, the authors obtain a mean grain diameter of 3.7 nm for the as-grown film, increasing to about 5.7 nm and 6.8 nm after annealing at 840 °C and 960 °C under ultrahigh vacuum. The practical value is that directly grown graphene on insulating substrates typically has nanometer-scale crystalline domains that limit device performance, and SPA-LEED offers a direct reciprocal-space measurement that does not require transfer or contact. The result also validates SPA-LEED as a sensitive, spatially averaging tool for assessing the structural coherence of two-dimensional materials on insulators.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the Airy-type diffraction profile for a circular coherent domain, I(θ)/I₀ = [2J₁(x)/x]² with x = πD/λ sinθ, which converts the FWHM of the (00) spot into a mean grain diameter D after subtracting two contributions: the instrumental response (0.012 Å⁻¹) and a broad bell-shaped component (0.77 Å⁻¹) typical of weakly bound 2D layers. The BSC subtraction matters because the graphene spot sits on that diffuse background. The method uses the specular spot because all graphene reflections share the same finite-size broadening.

What would settle it

Measure the width of the (00) spot on the same sample at several electron energies: true finite-size broadening is independent of perpendicular momentum transfer, whereas step-roughness or strain broadening varies with energy. If the derived grain diameter changes significantly with energy, the simple finite-size model is wrong. Alternatively, direct STM/AFM imaging of the same films should show grains or domains with diameters near 3.7 nm; if the observed features are far larger or smaller, the assignment to grain size fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

PECVD-grown few-layer graphene on sapphire shows a strongly broadened (00) diffraction spot, which the authors attribute entirely to finite-size broadening from small, coherently scattering graphene grains. Fitting the spot with an Airy-type profile—after subtracting the instrumental response (FWHM 0.012 Å⁻¹) and the bell-shaped diffuse component (FWHM 0.77 Å⁻¹)—yields mean grain diameters of 3.7 nm as-grown, 5.7 nm after 840 °C annealing, and 6.8 nm after 960 °C annealing. The spot's narrowing and intensity increase upon annealing, together with a falling Raman D/G ratio, support the assignment. The paper concludes that SPA-LEED is a sensitive, spatially averaging reciprocal-space technique

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the entire measured width of the (00) spot, after subtracting instrumental and bell-shaped backgrounds, comes from finite-size broadening by circular graphene grains; any appreciable contribution from the sapphire substrate, surface steps, or strain would change the derived grain sizes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SPA-LEED can be used as a routine, transfer-free tool to measure mean grain size of directly grown graphene on sapphire and similar insulating substrates.
  • Post-growth annealing at 840 °C under UHV increases the mean grain diameter from 3.7 nm to 5.7 nm; annealing at 960 °C gives 6.8 nm, indicating a saturating improvement with possible onset of interfacial dewetting (signaled by (3√3×3√3) reconstruction spots).
  • Because Raman-based grain-size estimates (Tuinstra–Koenig and Cançado relations) disagree with each other and with the SPA-LEED values, the diffraction measurement provides an independent, directly reciprocal-space reference for calibrating Raman crystallite-size analysis.
  • The presence of both R0 and R30 oriented grains with a rotational spread of about ±5° means the film is a textured polycrystal; spot-profile analysis can track how this texture evolves with growth and annealing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Airy-profile analysis could be extended to higher-order graphene spots at different electron energies; a constant deduced grain size across energies would further confirm the finite-size interpretation, while variations would point to strain or step contributions.
  • A direct cross-check with atomic-force or scanning-tunneling microscopy on the same samples would settle whether the 3.7 nm diameter corresponds to actual physical grains or to coherent domains separated by internal defects or lattice distortions.
  • If the method is as robust as claimed, it could be applied to other 2D materials grown directly on insulators (e.g., hBN, MoS₂) where weak binding produces similar bell-shaped backgrounds, making SPA-LEED a general quality-control probe for transfer-free device fabrication.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports SPA-LEED measurements on PECVD-grown few-layer graphene on sapphire (Al2O3(0001)). The authors fit the broadening of the specular (00) spot with an Airy-type diffraction profile and, after subtracting an instrumental response and a broad 'bell-shaped component', derive mean graphene grain diameters of 3.7 nm for the as-grown sample, and 5.7 nm and 6.8 nm after UHV annealing at 840 °C and 960 °C. They also present Raman spectra with large D/G ratios as qualitative support for nanoscale crystalline domains. The central claim is that SPA-LEED provides a quantitative reciprocal-space method for determining structural coherence of directly grown graphene on insulating substrates.

Significance. If the quantitative grain sizes were reliable, the paper would be a useful demonstration of SPA-LEED for characterizing graphene on insulating substrates, where other reciprocal-space methods are often difficult. The manuscript provides openly available data and clearly describes experimental conditions. However, the central quantitative result rests on two load-bearing assumptions: (i) that the width of the (00) spot is dominated by graphene finite-size broadening and not by scattering from the Al2O3 substrate, and (ii) that the Airy formula quoted is correctly converted into grain diameters. The first assumption is not established and is contradicted by the authors' own observation of substrate reconstruction spots near the (00) spot; the second appears internally inconsistent with the reported numbers. Because these issues affect every grain-size value in the paper, the significance of the contribution is not yet demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 3, and paragraph following Eq. (Airy profile)] The attribution of the measured (00)-spot width to graphene finite-size broadening is not justified. The specular spot contains scattering from both graphene and the Al2O3 substrate, and the instrumental reference was measured from a carbonized Al2O3 surface, not from the actual substrate under the graphene film. More seriously, Fig. 3(b,c) shows the emergence of Al2O3 (3√3×3√3) reconstruction spots at ±0.31 Å^-1 after annealing, i.e., substrate scattering changes in the same k∥ range as the (00) profile. No substrate component is modeled or subtracted, so the values D=3.7, 5.7, and 6.8 nm cannot be uniquely attributed to graphene. A decisive cross-check would be to analyze the graphene-specific first-order spots at k∥≈3.03 Å^-1, whose radial FWHM could independently determine the grain size; this is not done.
  2. [Section III, Airy profile equation] The reported grain sizes are internally inconsistent with the stated Airy formula. For I(θ)/I0=[2J1(x)/x]^2 with x=πD sinθ/λ = D k∥/2, the FWHM in k∥ is approximately Δk ≈ 6.46/D (where D is in Å and Δk in Å^-1). The quoted FWHMs of 0.15, 0.10, and 0.08 Å^-1 therefore imply D≈4.3, 6.5, and 8.1 nm, respectively, not 3.7, 5.7, and 6.8 nm as stated. This systematic ~15–20% discrepancy indicates that either the formula, the conversion, or the measured FWHM values are in error. The authors should correct the numeric conversion and state the exact relationship used.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 3 and fitting procedure] The procedure for separating the BSC (FWHM 0.77 Å^-1) from the finite-size-broadened (00) spot is not described. The text merely says 'after accounting for the instrumental response and the broad diffuse background,' but no fitting model, subtraction method, or residuals are provided. This lack of detail makes it difficult to assess the reliability of the deconvolution.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 1] The first-order graphene spots at k∥≈3.03 Å^-1 are visibly radially broad, but their FWHM is not quantified. Since these spots are graphene-specific, reporting their width would provide an important cross-check for the (00)-spot analysis and would strengthen the central claim.
  3. [Section III, text after Fig. 3] All grain-size values are quoted without uncertainties. Given that the rotational spread is estimated at ±5°, and the Airy conversion is sensitive to the FWHM, error bars should be provided for D in each preparation state.
  4. [Methods and Fig. 3 captions] The instrumental FWHM is given as 0.012 Å^-1 and the BSC FWHM as 0.77 Å^-1, while the (00)-spot FWHMs are stated as 0.15, 0.10, and 0.08 Å^-1. The notation is consistent, but it would help to explicitly state the k∥ units and the energy (69 eV) in the captions, and to note that the Airy formula is used in the small-angle approximation sinθ≈k∥/k.
  5. [References] The Airy formula is cited to an optics textbook (Ref. 56); for LEED spot-profile analysis, a more specific reference to the domain-size broadening formalism (e.g., Henzler's work) would aid the reader in understanding the assumptions used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No constructively circular step: grain sizes follow from a standard Airy-profile conversion of measured FWHM; self-citations identify only the broad BSC background and are not load-bearing for the central result.

full rationale

The quantitative claim is a measurement-to-parameter conversion. The (00)-spot FWHM is measured from the experimental profile (0.15, 0.10, and 0.08 Å^-1) and inserted into the textbook Airy diffraction formula I/I0=(2J1(x)/x)^2 with x=πD sinθ/λ to obtain D. The output D is not an input or a fit target defined in terms of the paper's own equations; it is an inverse use of an independent diffraction result. The bell-shaped component assignment (refs 48–50) is used only as a slowly varying background model under the much narrower finite-size spot; the central FWHM is extracted in linear scale, and the 0.77 Å^-1 BSC does not by construction determine the 0.15 Å^-1 width. The paper explicitly declines to use the Raman ID/IG estimates (2.4 nm vs 8.9 nm) as quantitative inputs, instead using Raman only as qualitative support, so no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. No uniqueness theorem or prior result of the same authors is invoked to forbid alternatives; the main inferential risk—that Al2O3 substrate scattering contributes to the same (00) region—is a physical attribution concern, not a circular derivation. The derivation chain (measured FWHM -> Airy formula -> grain diameter) is therefore self-contained in the circularity sense.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced. The derivation relies on a standard diffraction formula, a fitted diffuse background, and the assumption that the substrate does not contribute to the measured (00) width. The free-parameter count is small, but the central extraction depends on an unverified decomposition of the spot profile.

free parameters (1)
  • BSC amplitude and FWHM = FWHM ≈ 0.77 Å⁻¹
    The bell-shaped component is fitted to the diffuse background and subtracted; the choice of BSC shape and width strongly affects the remaining finite-size width and hence the reported grain diameters.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Airy diffraction profile for circular coherent domains
    The finite-size broadening is modeled as diffraction from circular islands using I/I0 = [2J1(x)/x]^2, a textbook Fraunhofer result.
  • standard math Electron wavelength at 69 eV from the non-relativistic relation
    The conversion from FWHM in Å⁻¹ to grain diameter depends on λ = sqrt(150.4 eV Ų / E).
  • domain assumption Bell-shaped component is an intrinsic, separable feature of weakly bound 2D layers
    The BSC identification relies on refs 48–50, largely authored by the present group, and is used to separate a broad background from the finite-size peak.
  • ad hoc to paper The (00) spot after subtracting instrumental response and BSC contains only graphene finite-size broadening
    No substrate-only control on the same sample is shown, although Al2O3 reconstruction spots appear near the (00) spot in Fig. 3(b,c). The substrate contribution to the specular beam is not modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spot Profile Analysis Low Energy Electron Diffraction of Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition Grown Epitaxial Few-Layer Graphene on Sapphire." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CSXYPOJ7

@misc{pith2026260714922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spot Profile Analysis Low Energy Electron Diffraction of Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition Grown Epitaxial Few-Layer Graphene on Sapphire},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CSXYPOJ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.14922}
}
abstract

We demonstrate the use of high-resolution spot-profile analysis low-energy electron diffraction to determine the mean grain size of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition grown few-layer graphene on sapphire (Al$_2$O$_3$). The diffraction patterns exhibit broadened graphene spots, pronounced diffuse scattering, and azimuthally extended features, indicating finite crystallite size and rotational disorder. By analyzing the finite-size broadening of the specular (00) spot with an Airy-type diffraction profile, we determine a mean grain diameter of 3.7$\,$nm for the as-grown graphene layer. Post-growth annealing under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions increases the mean grain size to about 5.7$\,$nm and 6.8$\,$nm, respectively. These results establish SPA-LEED as a sensitive reciprocal-space method for quantifying the structural coherence of directly grown graphene on insulating substrates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14922 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. SPA-LEED pattern of the as-grown graphene layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Raman spectra taken for the as-grown graphene sam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. LEED intensity profiles of the (00) spot in loga [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Javier Garc

    de Abajo, F. Javier Garc. ACS photonics , file =. 2025 , title =

    2025

  2. [2]

    Modulating growth of graphene on sapphire by chemical vapor deposition , pages =

    Ai, Ding and Yu, Hao and Ma, Yanhao and Cheng, Yonghong and Dong, Chengye , year =. Modulating growth of graphene on sapphire by chemical vapor deposition , pages =

  3. [3]

    Ultrahigh-mobility graphene devices from chemical vapor deposition on reusable copper , pages =

    Banszerus, Luca and Schmitz, Michael and Engels, Stephan and Dauber, Jan and Oellers, Martin and Haupt, Federica and Watanabe, Kenji and Taniguchi, Takashi and Beschoten, Bernd and Stampfer, Christoph , year =. Ultrahigh-mobility graphene devices from chemical vapor deposition on reusable copper , pages =. Science advances , file =

  4. [4]

    Barbosa, A. N. and Ptak, F. and Mendoza, C. D. and. 2019 , title =

    2019

  5. [5]

    Scientific reports , file =

    Bekd. Scientific reports , file =. 2020 , title =

    2020

  6. [6]

    , year =

    Chang, Chuan C. , year =

  7. [7]

    Layered Graphene Growth Directly on Sapphire Substrates for Applications , pages =

    Chang, Che-Jia and Tsai, Po-Cheng and Su, Wei-Ya and Huang, Chun-Yuan and Lee, Po-Tsung and Lin, Shih-Yen , year =. Layered Graphene Growth Directly on Sapphire Substrates for Applications , pages =. ACS omega , file =

  8. [8]

    Chen, S. and. 2019 , title =

    2019

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Chen, S. and. 2020 , title =

    2020

  2. [10]

    and Sun, Jingyu and Liu, Zhongfan , year =

    Chen, Zhaolong and Xie, Chunyu and Wang, Wendong and Zhao, Jinpei and Liu, Bingyao and Shan, Jingyuan and Wang, Xueyan and Hong, Min and Lin, Li and Huang, Li and Lin, Xiao and Yang, Shenyuan and Gao, Xuan and Zhang, Yanfeng and Gao, Peng and Novoselov, Kostya S. and Sun, Jing...

  3. [11]

    Coherence length and/or transfer width? , pages =

    Comsa, George , year =. Coherence length and/or transfer width? , pages =

  4. [12]

    and Busse, Carsten and Michely, Thomas , year =

    Coraux, Johann and N'Diaye, Alpha T. and Busse, Carsten and Michely, Thomas , year =. Structural coherency of graphene on

  5. [13]

    New Journal of Physics , file =

    Coraux, Johann and. New Journal of Physics , file =. 2009 , title =

    2009

  6. [14]

    Ferrari, A. C. and Robertson, J. , year =. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon , pages =

  7. [15]

    Journal of the American Ceramic Society , file =

    Gautier, Martine and Fenaud, Gilles and. Journal of the American Ceramic Society , file =. 1994 , title =

    1994

  8. [16]

    Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S. , year =. The rise of graphene , pages =

  9. [17]

    2024 , title =

    Georgiev, Dimitar and Pedersen, Simon Vilms and Xie, Ruoxiao and Fern. 2024 , title =

    2024

  10. [18]

    Correlation Between Crystallinity and Transfer Integrity of

    Guo, Xiaomeng and Qing, Fangzhu and Li, Xuesong , year =. Correlation Between Crystallinity and Transfer Integrity of. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , file =

  11. [19]

    Light, science

    Han, Jiayue and Fu, Ziyi and Wei, Jingxuan and Han, Song and Deng, Wenjie and Hu, Fangchen and Wang, Zhen and Zhou, Hongxi and Yu, He and Gou, Jun and Wang, Jun , year =. Light, science

  12. [20]

    and N'Diaye, A

    Hattab, H. and N'Diaye, A. T. and Wall, D. and Jnawali, G. and Coraux, J. and Busse, C. and. 2011 , title =

    2011

  13. [21]

    Optik , url =

    Hecht, Eugene , year =. Optik , url =

  14. [22]

    , year =

    Henzler, M. , year =

  15. [23]

    1999 , title =

    Zeitschrift f. 1999 , title =

    1999

  16. [24]

    Epitaxial growth of large-area single-layer graphene over

    Hu, Baoshan and Ago, Hiroki and Ito, Yoshito and Kawahara, Kenji and Tsuji, Masaharu and Magome, Eisuke and Sumitani, Kazushi and Mizuta, Noriaki and Ikeda, Ken-ichi and Mizuno, Seigi , year =. Epitaxial growth of large-area single-layer graphene over

  17. [25]

    and Starke, Ulrich , year =

    Iwasaki, Takayuki and Park, Hye Jin and Konuma, Mitsuharu and Lee, Dong Su and Smet, Jurgen H. and Starke, Ulrich , year =. Long-range ordered single-crystal graphene on high-quality heteroepitaxial

  18. [26]

    Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) , file =

    Jankauskas,. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) , file =. 2024 , title =

    2024

  19. [27]

    2025 , title =

    Kaya, Umut and Sahinovic, Armin and L. 2025 , title =

    2025

  20. [28]

    Advanced Optical Materials , file =

    Kaya, Umut and L. Advanced Optical Materials , file =. 2026 , title =

    2026

  21. [29]

    Langer, T. and F. New Journal of Physics , file =. 2011 , title =

    2011

  22. [30]

    , year =

    Lapujoulade, J. , year =. A statistical model for the scattering of atoms from randomly stepped surfaces , pages =

  23. [31]

    and Colombo, Luigi and Ruoff, Rodney S

    Li, Xuesong and Cai, Weiwei and An, Jinho and Kim, Seyoung and Nah, Junghyo and Yang, Dongxing and Piner, Richard and Velamakanni, Aruna and Jung, Inhwa and Tutuc, Emanuel and Banerjee, Sanjay K. and Colombo, Luigi and Ruoff, Rodney S. , year =. Large-area synthesis of high-qu...

  24. [32]

    Wafer-Scale Graphene Growth on

    Li, Mengying and Zou, Pinggen and Chen, Zhi and Zhao, Ruotong and Tang, Cao and Wang, Shuai and Ma, Yanqing and Ma, Lei , year =. Wafer-Scale Graphene Growth on

  25. [33]

    The growth mechanisms of graphene directly on sapphire substrates by using the chemical vapor deposition , pages =

    Lin, Meng-Yu and Su, Chen-Fung and Lee, Si-Chen and Lin, Shih-Yen , year =. The growth mechanisms of graphene directly on sapphire substrates by using the chemical vapor deposition , pages =

  26. [34]

    The Roadmap of 2D Materials and Devices Toward Chips , pages =

    Liu, Anhan and Zhang, Xiaowei and Liu, Ziyu and Li, Yuning and Peng, Xueyang and Li, Xin and Qin, Yue and Hu, Chen and Qiu, Yanqing and Jiang, Han and Wang, Yang and Li, Yifan and Tang, Jun and Liu, Jun and Guo, Hao and Deng, Tao and Peng, Songang and Tian, He and Ren, Tian-Li...

  27. [35]

    2014 , title =

    Locatelli, Andrea and Zamborlini, Giovanni and Mente. 2014 , title =

    2014

  28. [36]

    Physical Review B , file =

    Loginova, Elena and Nie, Shu and Th. Physical Review B , file =. 2009 , title =

    2009

  29. [37]

    Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) , file =

    Lozano, Miguel Sinusia and Bernat-Montoya, Ignacio and Angelova, Todora Ivanova and Mojena, Alberto Bosc. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) , file =. 2023 , title =

    2023

  30. [38]

    Malard, L. M. and Pimenta, M. A. and Dresselhaus, G. and Dresselhaus, M. S. , year =

  31. [39]

    A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper , pages =

    Mattevi, Cecilia and Kim, Hokwon and Chhowalla, Manish , year =. A review of chemical vapour deposition of graphene on copper , pages =

  32. [40]

    Matthews, M. J. and Pimenta, M. A. and Dresselhaus, G. and Dresselhaus, M. S. and Endo, M. , year =. Origin of dispersive effects of the

  33. [41]

    and Viswanath, B

    McNerny, Daniel Q. and Viswanath, B. and Copic, Davor and Laye, Fabrice R. and Prohoda, Christophor and Brieland-Shoultz, Anna C. and Polsen, Erik S. and Dee, Nicholas T. and Veerasamy, Vijayen S. and Hart, A. John , year =. Direct fabrication of graphene on. Scientific report...

  34. [42]

    Direct growth of graphene on

    Mischke, Jan and Pennings, Joel and Weisenseel, Erik and Kerger, Philipp and Rohwerder, Michael and Mertin, Wolfgang and Bacher, Gerd , year =. Direct growth of graphene on. 2D Materials , file =

  35. [43]

    and Whelan, Patrick R

    Mishra, Neeraj and Forti, Stiven and Fabbri, Filippo and Martini, Leonardo and McAleese, Clifford and Conran, Ben R. and Whelan, Patrick R. and Shivayogimath, Abhay and Jessen, Bjarke S. and Bu. 2019 , title =

    2019

  36. [44]

    ACS applied materials

    Mohanty, Smruti Ranjan and Brendel, Lothar and Kriegel, Marko and Ganser, Niels and. ACS applied materials. 2026 , title =

    2026

  37. [45]

    , year =

    Neumaier, Daniel and Pindl, Stephan and Lemme, Max C. , year =. Integrating graphene into semiconductor fabrication lines , pages =

  38. [46]

    Novoselov, K. S. and Geim, A. K. and Morozov, S. V. and Jiang, D. and Zhang, Y. and Dubonos, S. V. and Grigorieva, I. V. and Firsov, A. A. , year =. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films , pages =

  39. [47]

    and Kriegel, M

    Omambac, K. and Kriegel, M. and Brand, C. and Finke, B. and Kremeyer, L. and Hattab, H. and Janoschka, D. and Dreher, P. and. 2021 , title =

    2021

  40. [48]

    2021 , title =

    Petrovi. 2021 , title =

    2021

  41. [49]

    , year =

    Rasetti, F. , year =. ON THE RAMAN EFFECT IN DIATOMIC GASES , pages =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , file =

  42. [50]

    and Gledhill, Andrew D

    Reddy, Kongara M. and Gledhill, Andrew D. and Chen, Chun-Hu and Drexler, Julie M. and Padture, Nitin P. , year =. High quality, transferrable graphene grown on single crystal

  43. [51]

    All-optical technique to correlate defect structure and carrier transport in transferred graphene films , pages =

    Rochford, Caitlin and Kumar, Nardeep and Liu, Jianwei and Zhao, Hui and Wu, Judy , year =. All-optical technique to correlate defect structure and carrier transport in transferred graphene films , pages =. ACS applied materials

  44. [52]

    Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) , file =

    Rodr. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) , file =. 2021 , title =

    2021

  45. [53]

    Direct Growth of Graphene Films on Sapphire (0001) and (11

    Saito, Kosuke and Ogino, Toshio , year =. Direct Growth of Graphene Films on Sapphire (0001) and (11

  46. [54]

    and Meyer, G

    Scheithauer, U. and Meyer, G. and Henzler, M. , year =. A new

  47. [55]

    and Acharya, D

    Sutter, E. and Acharya, D. P. and Sadowski, J. T. and Sutter, P. , year =. Scanning tunneling microscopy on epitaxial bilayer graphene on ruthenium (0001) , pages =

  48. [56]

    and Hybertsen, M

    Sutter, P. and Hybertsen, M. S. and Sadowski, J. T. and Sutter, E. , year =. Electronic structure of few-layer epitaxial graphene on

  49. [57]

    Sutter, P. W. and Albrecht, P. M. and Sutter, E. A. , year =. Graphene growth on epitaxial

  50. [58]

    and Sutter, Eli A

    Sutter, Peter and Sadowski, Jerzy T. and Sutter, Eli A. , year =. Chemistry under cover: tuning metal-graphene interaction by reactive intercalation , pages =

  51. [59]

    and Hishita, S

    Suzuki, T. and Hishita, S. and Oyoshi, K. and Souda, R. , year =. Structure of

  52. [60]

    and Koenig, J

    Tuinstra, F. and Koenig, J. L. , year =. Raman Spectrum of Graphite , pages =

  53. [61]

    Surface Science , file =

    Vilfan, Igor and Lan. Surface Science , file =. 1997 , title =

    1997

  54. [62]

    Epitaxial graphene prepared by chemical vapor deposition on single crystal thin iridium films on sapphire , pages =

    Vo-Van, Chi and Kimouche, Amina and Reserbat-Plantey, Antoine and Fruchart, Olivier and Bayle-Guillemaud, Pascale and Bendiab, Nedjma and Coraux, Johann , year =. Epitaxial graphene prepared by chemical vapor deposition on single crystal thin iridium films on sapphire , pages =

  55. [63]

    Wang, Huaping and Yu, Gui , year =. Direct

  56. [64]

    Yim, W. M. and Paff, R. J. , year =. Thermal expansion of

  57. [65]

    2025 , title =

    Yin, Lei and Wang, Junyong and Sun, Yinghui and Liu, Xingqiang and Zou, Xuming and Cheng, Ruiqing and Wang, Hao and Zhu, Yushan and Gong, Xunguo and. 2025 , title =

    2025

  58. [66]

    Latest advances in the scalable synthesis of graphene and its versatile applications in energy, electronics, composites, biomedical, and environmental technologies , pages =

    Yuan, Weikang and Chen, Huiyu and Xue, Jinhong and Fu, Hui and Zhao, Fulai and Feng, Yiyu , year =. Latest advances in the scalable synthesis of graphene and its versatile applications in energy, electronics, composites, biomedical, and environmental technologies , pages =. 2D...

  59. [67]

    Review of chemical vapor deposition of graphene and related applications , pages =

    Zhang, Yi and Zhang, Luyao and Zhou, Chongwu , year =. Review of chemical vapor deposition of graphene and related applications , pages =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.