Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Ridge-Spin-Layer Coupling and Emergent Ridgetronics in 2D Altermagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Flat ridge bands in 2D altermagnets lock spin to direction of travel.

desk verdict New ridge concept in altermagnets with plausible candidates, but the symmetry foundation is an unpublished classification and the exact-zero transport claims are overstated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15009 v1 pith:U2JHWMNF submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Mu Tian , Run-Wu Zhang , Chaoxi Cui , Zhi-Ming Yu , Yugui Yao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords ridge-spin-layercouplingaltermagnetismdispersionlessbandsspinlayergroupsspin-polarizedtransportelectricHalleffecttwo-dimensionalmaterialsquasi-one-dimensional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces ridge–spin–layer coupling (RSLC), a mechanism in two-dimensional altermagnets in which a one-dimensional line of dispersionless electronic states—a “ridge” in momentum space—carries a fixed spin and a fixed atomic sublayer. Because each ridge has zero group velocity along its direction, current along that direction is suppressed, so conduction becomes quasi-one-dimensional and fully spin-polarized along orthogonal axes. The authors identify three materials, led by monolayer Mg2Mo2(PO5)2, where this should occur, and predict an electric-field-tunable Hall effect whose sign flips with an out-of-plane gate field. If correct, ridge states turn flat-band-like physics into a controllable degree of freedom for spintronic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the ridge state—a 1D continuous line of dispersionless electronic states whose energy is independent of one momentum component, so the group velocity along that component vanishes. The carrying symmetry is the spin layer group operation {C2||OL}, which interchanges both spin and layer polarization and connects the two orthogonal ridges. The microscopic origin is the anisotropic hopping of dxz and dyz orbitals: each orbital hops strongly along one axis and weakly along the other, and opposite-spin sites related by {C2||OL} enforce the dispersionless ridge. The candidate-materials search is guided by a classification of 40 spin layer groups of square-lattice altermagnets,

What would settle it

Measure (or compute with spin-orbit coupling) the band dispersion along the ridge direction in monolayer Mg2Mo2(PO5)2 near the Fermi level; if the ridge band shows significant kx dispersion rather than being flat, the predicted σxx = 0 and SP = −1 become finite and the mechanism is not exact. Independently, re-derive the spin-layer-group classification of ref. [59] to check the list of 8 (of 40) groups and the 2 RSLC-permitting groups.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a 2D altermagnet, the two spin channels can each host a dispersionless line (ridge) along orthogonal momentum directions, and a specific spin-layer-group symmetry {C2||OL} locks the up-spin ridge to one atomic sublayer and the down-spin ridge to the other. The paper shows that this ridge–spin–layer coupling makes the conductivity strictly spin-anisotropic: for monolayer Mg2Mo2(PO5)2 only σ↓xx and σ↑yy are nonzero, giving spin polarizations SPxx = −1 and SPyy = +1, so currents along x and y are 100% spin polarized with opposite spins. Applying an electric field Ez lifts the degeneracy of the two ridges and produces a layer-dependent electric Hall effect whose sign reverses with the field d

Load-bearing premise

The entire materials list rests on an unpublished classification of the 40 spin layer groups of altermagnetic square lattices and the claim that only two of them allow ridge–spin–layer coupling; if that classification is wrong, the candidate materials and the “complete paradigm” claim fall apart.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ridge states give a built-in direction filter: current along the ridge direction is suppressed, so transport is confined to the orthogonal direction.
  • Fully spin-polarized currents flow along orthogonal directions with opposite spins, giving SPxx = −1 and SPyy = +1 in the predicted energy window.
  • An out-of-plane electric field lifts the ridge degeneracy and reverses the sign of the anomalous Hall conductivity, offering gate control without a magnetic field.
  • Three materials (Mg2Mo2(PO5)2, Ca(FeP)2, Mg2V2(SO5)2) are proposed as the first realizations, giving concrete targets for experiment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strict zeros (σxx = 0, SP = ±1) rely on perfectly dispersionless bands; any real kx dispersion—e.g., from spin-orbit coupling—turns these into small but finite values, so the practical claim is “highly anisotropic” rather than exact.
  • The material search depends on an unpublished enumeration of spin layer groups cited as ref. [59]; independent verification of that classification would materially strengthen the predictions.
  • If the symmetry mechanism is generic, similar ridge–spin–layer locking might be engineered in non-square lattices or in bilayers, extending ridgetronics beyond the three candidates listed.
  • The same zero-group-velocity suppression should affect other transport channels (thermal, magnon), so ridge states could serve as direction-discriminating filters beyond charge current.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'ridge–spin–layer coupling' (RSLC) in two-dimensional altermagnets, where a one-dimensional continuous line of dispersionless states (a 'ridge') is locked to both spin polarization and atomic sublayer. It proposes a tight-binding mechanism based on dxz/dyz hopping, uses a spin layer group classification to screen for candidate materials, and reports DFT-based transport calculations for monolayer Mg2Mo2(PO5)2 showing orthogonal spin-polarized conductivities and an electric-field-switchable Hall response. The authors claim this establishes a complete paradigm for 'ridgetronics'.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the proposal extends valleytronics from discrete points to continuous lines and offers a concrete route to direction-discriminating, layer-controlled spin transport in altermagnets. The symmetry-based screening and the three candidate materials are potentially useful. However, the two main pillars of the paper—the exhaustive spin layer group enumeration and the strictly zero conductivities derived from nearly flat DFT bands—are not presently verifiable from the manuscript. The significance is therefore conditional on making these parts reproducible and quantitative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table I and 'Physical mechanism for RSLC'] …
  2. ['Layer-dependent Q1D spin transport', Eq. (2)-(3), Fig. 3(c), Fig. 4(c-d)] …
  3. ['Layer-dependent electric Hall effect', Fig. 4(e-f)] …
minor comments (6)
  1. [References] Reference [17] and [23] are the same (Rycerz et al., Nat. Phys. 3, 172 (2007)); please remove the duplicate.
  2. [Introduction] There is a stray word in the sentence 'spin d.o.f. characteristics. These d.o.f.'; the text appears to be malformed. Please rephrase.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The Hamiltonian notation is unclear: H = εα + matrix, with ε and α undefined. Please define the orbital basis, the meaning of ε and α, and specify that δ is a small parameter that quantifies the residual dispersion.
  4. [Candidate materials] The MAE is quoted as '3.23 meV/Mo' in one place and 'MAE = 6.6 meV' in another. If the latter is the total per cell with two Mo atoms, this should be stated explicitly.
  5. [Fig. 3(c)] The caption says 'SP_xx and SP_yy reaches -1 and 1'; change 'reaches' to 'reach' (or rephrase).
  6. [Units] Use a consistent format for electric field values, e.g., '0.1 eV/Å' with spaces or no spaces throughout.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Load-bearing completeness claim rests on unpublished self-citation [59]; otherwise DFT content is independent.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 'Physical mechanism for RSLC', paragraph beginning 'Applying these constraints...'; Table I; references list [59]]
    "Applying these constraints to the 40 spin layer groups (SLGs) of altermagnetic square lattices [59], we identify 8 SLGs that satisfy all requirements for ridge–spin coupling. ... [59] Mu Tian et al. (unpublished)."

    The paper's 'complete paradigm' and its material-screening framework depend on an enumeration of 40 SLGs and the selection of 8 (and 2 with RSLC) that is attributed entirely to ref. [59], an unpublished manuscript by the present first author and coauthors. The paper does not reproduce the classification or otherwise make it independently checkable, so the central premise is an unverified input from the authors' own prior work. If that classification is incomplete or the Wyckoff-position criteria are misapplied, the claimed generality and the candidate list collapse. This is a load-bearing self-citation, not an external mathematical fact.

full rationale

The transport consequence σ_xx=0 follows directly from the definition of a ridge (Eqs. (1)-(2)) and is not by itself a circular prediction; the paper's material realization is supported by independent DFT band structures, layer-resolved conductivity calculations, and first-principles Hall response calculations. The main circularity concern is the unpublished same-author classification [59] used to claim completeness and to generate candidate materials; this is load-bearing and not externally verified. However, the central material calculations have independent content and are not merely renamed inputs, so the paper does not reduce entirely to its own assumptions. The idealized exact-zero conductivities and SP=±1 are a modeling limitation rather than a defined-input circularity and are better classified as a correctness/robustness concern. Score 4 reflects one significant load-bearing self-citation while the core DFT evidence remains independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on: (i) an unpublished enumeration of spin layer groups; (ii) the assumption of exact flatness; (iii) the orbital-hopping picture; (iv) Boltzmann transport; and (v) the S4zT/electric-Hall framework. None of these are derived within this letter; the only first-principles evidence is the DFT band structure and response calculations, whose details are in the omitted SM.

free parameters (3)
  • Tight-binding parameters ε, π0, π1, π2, δ = not specified
    Chosen to illustrate the ridge mechanism (δ≈0); the band structures in Fig. 2(b,d) depend on these values but no values are given, and the model is not fitted to the DFT bands.
  • Electric field strength Ez = ±0.1 eV/Å
    Used to demonstrate ridge splitting and Hall switching; chosen by hand and very large for a gated monolayer, so the quantitative response is illustrative.
  • Energy window for Hall peak = -0.5 eV to -0.1 eV
    Selected post hoc as the range where 'no interfering bands appear'; the selection rule is not stated a priori and may bias the reported σxy peak.
assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper The enumeration of 40 spin layer groups of altermagnetic square lattices and the classification of 8 (2 with RSLC) are correct (ref. [59], unpublished).
    The entire material screening depends on this enumeration; it is cited to an unpublished manuscript by the same authors and cannot be checked from the letter.
  • domain assumption Ridge states are exactly dispersionless along one direction in the transport window.
    Required for σxx = 0 and SP = ±1; DFT bands are only approximately flat, and SOC (Fig. 4c,d) introduces finite dispersion.
  • domain assumption The d-orbital hopping anisotropy (dxz strong along x, weak along y; dyz opposite) survives in the real materials.
    Basis of the TB mechanism, taken from ref. [54]; not explicitly verified for the candidates except via projected bands.
  • domain assumption Boltzmann transport with a constant relaxation time (σ ∝ vαvβ) applies.
    Used to convert flat bands to zero conductivity; ignores vertex corrections and lifetime anisotropy.
  • domain assumption S4zT symmetry forbids intrinsic σxy but permits the electric Hall coefficient χxy.
    Invoked in the Hall section; relies on the electric Hall framework of ref. [63] by the same group.
invented entities (1)
  • Ridge (1D continuous line of dispersionless states in momentum space)
    purpose: New electronic degree of freedom for direction-discriminating transport
    The ridge is defined as a flat line in the band structure; it appears in the DFT bands shown, but no prediction is made that could falsify it outside this paper (it is a feature of the computed bands, not an independently measurable object). The concept is closely related to known flat-band and nodal-line notions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ridge-Spin-Layer Coupling and Emergent Ridgetronics in 2D Altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U2JHWMNF

@misc{pith2026260715009,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ridge-Spin-Layer Coupling and Emergent Ridgetronics in 2D Altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U2JHWMNF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15009}
}
abstract

Extending valleytronics from discrete points to continuous lines in momentum space transforms dispersionless bands into a controllable degree of freedom. Here we introduce ridge--spin--layer coupling (RSLC) in two-dimensional (2D) altermagnets, where a one-dimensional continuous line of dispersionless electronic states (a ridge) in momentum space locks to both spin polarization and atomic sublayer. This ridge-induced quenching of kinetic energy mimics flat-band physics, yet crucially, RSLC grants external control, allowing for layer-selective switching of ridge orientation in reciprocal space, spin-filtered transport in real space, and a distinct electric Hall response. Guided by collinear spin layer group symmetry, we identify three 2D candidate materials, namely Mg$_2$Mo$_2$(PO$_5$)$_2$, Ca(FeP)$_2$, and Mg$_2$V$_2$(SO$_5$)$_2$, each featuring a crossed-ridge structure with two ridges, one per spin channel and sublayer. Our work establishes ridgetronics as a controllable platform for direction-discriminating currents, bridging dispersionless bands with multifunctional device operation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15009 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Zero-dimensional valley (localized extremum) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Schematic lattice model for RSLC based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Illustration of layer-dependent Q1D spin transport. (b) Layer-resolved analysis of the ridge states [highlighted by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a,b) Illustration of the layer-dependent electric Hall effect under opposite electric fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references

  1. [59]

    L.-F. Lin, N. Kaushal, Y. Zhang, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Orbital ordering in the layered perovskite material CsVF4, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  2. [1]

    The Mo atoms occupy the Wyck- off position 2g and are therefore situated in two distinct layers, namely the top and bottom layers, as illustrated in Fig. 2(a). The top- and bottom-layer Mo atoms are related by the symmetry operation{C 2||S4z}, which in- terchanges the spin and layer polarizations of electronic states along the Γ-X-Mand Γ-Y-Mpaths. The non...

  3. [2]

    F. A. Zwanenburg, A. S. Dzurak, A. Morello, M. Y. Sim- mons, L. C. L. Hollenberg, G. Klimeck, S. Rogge, S. N. Coppersmith, and M. A. Eriksson, Silicon quantum elec- tronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 961 (2013)

    2013

  4. [3]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  5. [4]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  6. [5]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16055 (2016)

    2016

  7. [6]

    Joachim, J

    C. Joachim, J. K. Gimzewski, and A. Aviram, Electron- ics using hybrid-molecular and mono-molecular devices, Nature408, 541 (2000)

    2000

  8. [7]

    J. Wu, W. Pisula, and K. M¨ ullen, Graphenes as Potential Material for Electronics, Chem. Rev.107, 718 (2007)

    2007

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Coleman, and M. S. Strano, Electronics and optoelectronics of two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Nan- otechnol.7, 699 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Fiori, F

    G. Fiori, F. Bonaccorso, G. Iannaccone, T. Pala- 6 cios, D. Neumaier, A. Seabaugh, S. K. Banerjee, and L. Colombo, Electronics based on two-dimensional ma- terials, Nat. Nanotechnol.9, 768 (2014)

    2014

  3. [10]

    S. D. Bader and S. S. P. Parkin, Spintronics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 71 (2010)

    2010

  4. [11]

    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. Von Moln´ ar, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A Spin- Based Electronics Vision for the Future, Science294, 1488 (2001)

    2001

  5. [12]

    Chappert, A

    C. Chappert, A. Fert, and F. N. Van Dau, The emergence of spin electronics in data storage, Nat. Mater.6, 813 (2007)

    2007

  6. [13]

    D. D. Awschalom and M. E. Flatt´ e, Challenges for semi- conductor spintronics, Nat. Phys.3, 153 (2007)

    2007

  7. [14]

    Gunawan, Y

    O. Gunawan, Y. P. Shkolnikov, K. Vakili, T. Gokmen, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan, Valley Susceptibil- ity of an Interacting Two-Dimensional Electron System, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 186404 (2006)

    2006

  8. [15]

    Takashina, Y

    K. Takashina, Y. Ono, A. Fujiwara, Y. Takahashi, and Y. Hirayama, Valley Polarization in Si(100) at Zero Mag- netic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 236801 (2006)

    2006

  9. [16]

    K. Eng, R. N. McFarland, and B. E. Kane, Integer Quan- tum Hall Effect on a Six-Valley Hydrogen-Passivated Sil- icon (111) Surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 016801 (2007)

    2007

  10. [17]

    D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-Contrasting Physics in Graphene: Magnetic Moment and Topological Trans- port, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 236809 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys.10, 343 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    M. Sui, G. Chen, L. Ma, W.-Y. Shan, D. Tian, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Jin, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable topological valley transport in bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys.11, 1027 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Tong, S.-J

    W.-Y. Tong, S.-J. Gong, X. Wan, and C.-G. Duan, Con- cepts of ferrovalley material and anomalous valley Hall effect, Nat. Commun.7, 13612 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    C. Jin, J. Kim, M. I. B. Utama, E. C. Regan, H. Klee- mann, H. Cai, Y. Shen, M. J. Shinner, A. Sengupta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Imaging of pure spin-valley diffusion current in WS2-WSe2 heterostructures, Science360, 893 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    J. Xin, Y. Tang, Y. Liu, X. Zhao, H. Pan, and T. Zhu, Valleytronics in thermoelectric materials, npj Quantum Mater.3, 9 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Rycerz, J

    A. Rycerz, J. Tworzyd lo, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Val- ley filter and valley valve in graphene, Nat. Phys.3, 172 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Y. P. Shkolnikov, E. P. De Poortere, E. Tutuc, and M. Shayegan, Valley Splitting of AlAs Two-Dimensional Electrons in a Perpendicular Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 226805 (2002)

    2002

  18. [26]

    Pizzi, D

    G. Pizzi, D. Volja, B. Kozinsky, M. Fornari, and N. Marzari, BoltzWann: A code for the evaluation of thermoelectric and electronic transport properties with a maximally-localized Wannier functions basis, Comput. Phys. Commun.185, 422 (2014)

    2014

  19. [27]

    J. M. Ziman,Principles of the Theory of Solids, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1972)

    1972

  20. [28]

    T. J. Scheidemantel, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, T. Thonhauser, J. V. Badding, and J. O. Sofo, Transport coefficients from first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B68, 125210 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    G. K. H. Madsen, Automated Search for New Thermo- electric Materials: The Case of LiZnSb, J. Am. Chem. Soc.128, 12140 (2006)

    2006

  22. [30]

    B. R. Nag,Electron Transport in Compound Semiconduc- tors, Vol. 11 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Effi- cient Electrical Spin Splitter Based on Nonrelativistic Collinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    X. Li, T. Cao, Q. Niu, J. Shi, and J. Feng, Coupling the valley degree of freedom to antiferromagnetic order, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.110, 3738 (2013)

    2013

  26. [34]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Cou- pled spin and valley physics in monolayers of MoS 2 and other group-VI dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    M. M. Gruji´ c, M. ˇZ. Tadi´ c, and F. M. Peeters, Spin- Valley Filtering in Strained Graphene Structures with Artificially Induced Carrier Mass and Spin-Orbit Cou- pling, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 046601 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Q. Cui, Y. Zhu, J. Liang, P. Cui, and H. Yang, Spin- valley coupling in a two-dimensional VSi 2N4 monolayer, Phys. Rev. B103, 085421 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Z.-M. Yu, S. Guan, X.-L. Sheng, W. Gao, and S. A. Yang, Valley-Layer Coupling: A New Design Principle for Val- leytronics, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 037701 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Zhao, G.-B

    J. Zhao, G.-B. Liu, P. Chen, Y. Yao, G. Zhang, and L. Du, Layer-valley hall effect under inversion and time- reversal symmetries, Chin. Phys. Lett.41, 066801 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    X. Xu, Z. He, Y. Dai, B. Huang, L. Kou, and Y. Ma, Stable valley-layer coupling and design principle in 2D lattice, Appl. Phys. Lett.119, 073101 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Y. Han, C. Cui, X.-P. Li, T.-T. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z.- M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Cornertronics in Two-Dimensional Second-Order Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 176602 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, Y. Wang, J. Duan, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Quantized spin hall conductivity in altermag- netic Fe2Te2O with mirror-spin coupling, Phys. Rev. B , (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    Jiang, F

    C. Jiang, F. Liu, J. Cuadra, Z. Huang, K. Li, A. Ras- mita, A. Srivastava, Z. Liu, and W.-B. Gao, Zeeman split- ting via spin-valley-layer coupling in bilayer MoTe2, Nat. Commun.8, 802 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Bertoni, C

    R. Bertoni, C. W. Nicholson, L. Waldecker, H. H¨ ubener, C. Monney, U. De Giovannini, M. Puppin, M. Hoesch, E. Springate, R. T. Chapman, C. Cacho, M. Wolf, A. Ru- bio, and R. Ernstorfer, Generation and Evolution of Spin-, Valley-, and Layer-Polarized Excited Carriers in invers...

    2016

  36. [44]

    Jeong, H

    Y. Jeong, H. Park, T. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jung, and J. Jang, Interplay of valley, layer and band topology towards interacting quantum phases in moir´ e bilayer graphene, Nat. Commun.15, 6351 (2024). 7

    2024

  37. [45]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable Gate-Field Control of Spin in Altermagnets with Spin-Layer Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    W. Sun, W. Wang, C. Yang, S. Huang, N. Ding, S. Dong, and Z. Cheng, Designing Spin Symmetry for Altermag- netism with Strong Magnetoelectric Coupling, Adv. Sci. 12, e03235 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric Altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity Alters Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Y. Zhu, M. Gu, Y. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Li, S. Du, and Q. Liu, Sliding Ferroelectric Control of Unconventional Magnetism in Stacked Bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 056801 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Con- ventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Re- search Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring New Frontiers in Magnetism and Spintronics, e Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    S. S. Fender, O. Gonzalez, and D. K. Bediako, Altermag- netism: A Chemical Perspective, J. Am. Chem. Soc.147, 2257 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl ´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P...

    2024

  46. [54]

    See Supplemental Material for details about spin layer groups, candidate materials and DFT calculations

  47. [55]

    G. v. Chen and C. Wu, Orbital homology of p and t2gor- bitals in models and materials, arXiv:2512.22658 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    Huang, Y

    W. Huang, Y. Zhou, and H. Yao, Exotic Cooper pairing in multiorbital models of Sr 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B100, 134506

  49. [57]

    Kallin, Chiralp-wave order in Sr 2RuO4, Rep

    C. Kallin, Chiralp-wave order in Sr 2RuO4, Rep. Prog. Phys.75, 042501

  50. [58]

    Raghu, A

    S. Raghu, A. Kapitulnik, and S. A. Kivelson, Hidden Quasi-One-Dimensional Superconductivity in Sr 2RuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 136401

  51. [60]

    (unpublished)

    Mu Tian et al. (unpublished)

  52. [61]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Represen- tation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  53. [62]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders, Phys. Rev. X14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  54. [63]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  55. [64]

    Cui, R.-W

    C. Cui, R.-W. Zhang, Y. Qiu, Y. Han, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Electric Hall Effect and Quantum Electric Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 116301 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.