Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 77 references

Local magnetic correlations and light-sensitive centers in the Cr2AlC MAX phase

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cr2AlC is a weak metallic paramagnet whose only light-sensitive magnetic response lives in a dilute population of Cr centers, not in the bulk.

desk verdict Solid SQUID work and an honest decomposition, but the ESR light-effect needs a heating control before it can carry the optomagnetism claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15110 v1 pith:SSGV7GOD submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Malgorzata Wierzbowska , Anna Basa , Kazuhiro Marumoto , Jiaxi Wang , Katarzyna Gas , Maciej Sawicki , Kacper Sierakowski , Karel Carva
show 1 more author
Michal Bockowski
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 75.20.-g75.30.Et76.30.-v71.35.-y
keywords Cr2AlCMAXphasesMXeneprecursorsPauliparamagnetismantiferromagneticCr-CrdimerselectronspinresonanceoptomagnetismBethe-Salpeterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to settle a disputed question: is Cr2AlC magnetic, and can its magnetism be controlled with light? It argues that the answer to the second is 'only at the level of rare local centers,' and backs that with a quantitative decomposition of the magnetic response. The dominant signal is Pauli-like paramagnetism of itinerant Cr electrons; a sizable antiferromagnetic dimer contribution (~15% of Cr) explains the non-monotonic temperature dependence; a trace Curie population (~0.02%, S = 3/2) causes the low-temperature upturn. Light experiments show no bulk optomagnetic effect in magnetometry, but ESR at 4 K sees a reversible, light-induced reduction of a local magnetic signal confined to tens of ppm of Cr sites. If correct, this hierarchy sets the reference for designing MAX/MXene materials where defects, surfaces, or reduced dimensionality could amplify these dilute optically active centers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing analysis tools are three. The Bleaney-Bowers model, an exchange-coupled dimer Hamiltonian H = -2J S1·S2, converts the non-monotonic susceptibility into a dimer fraction and exchange energy, identifying a ~15% population of antiferromagnetically coupled Cr-Cr pairs. The differential Brillouin-function analysis isolates the dilute S = 3/2 Curie component by subtracting isotherms at nearby temperatures, pinning down its spin and ~0.02% concentration. The ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation calculation, combined with maximally localized Wannier-function projections of the spin bands, defines a ΔM indicator that says, for each optical transition, whether electron-hole excitation tr

What would settle it

Measure the ESR cavity or sample temperature during illumination; if the temperature jumps from 4 K toward ~17 K, the observed ~77% intensity drop would be thermal, not optoelectronic. Alternatively, compare the light-on spectrum with a dark ESR spectrum recorded at the temperature that light actually produces, and repeat the illumination with monochromatic light tuned to the BSE-predicted wavelengths (THz in-plane, ~1200 nm c-axis) and away from them: an electronic spin-transfer mechanism should show a wavelength-specific reduction, while heating would be broadband.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a hierarchy of magnetic contributions in Cr2AlC. The material is a weak metallic paramagnet whose dominant response is Pauli-like susceptibility from itinerant Cr states; its non-monotonic temperature dependence is described by the Bleaney-Bowers model of antiferromagnetically coupled Cr-Cr dimers (about 15% of Cr ions, J/kB ≈ 760 K); and a Curie-like upturn at low temperature comes from about 0.02% of Cr sites carrying S = 3/2. SQUID magnetometry under red light finds no bulk optomagnetic effect, only reversible heating of about 0.3 K. ESR at 4 K finds a reversible light-induced reduction of a local signal that involves tens of ppm of the Cr sublattice, explained by opt

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the light-induced drop in the 4 K ESR signal is an electronic redistribution of spin among Cr-related centers, not sample heating by the lamp or a non-chromium defect resonance; the ESR run reports no in-situ temperature or heating budget to rule those out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the hierarchy is right, bulk Cr2AlC cannot serve as a macroscopically switchable optomagnet; any light-driven magnetic function would have to exploit dilute centers, defects, or surface states.
  • The ~15% dimer fraction with J/kB ≈ 760 K explains the nonzero temperature-dependent susceptibility and reconciles earlier conflicting reports of weak magnetism in Cr2AlC without invoking long-range order.
  • Because the optically modified spin population is only tens of ppm, ESR is the appropriate probe; integral magnetometry is expected to miss the effect, as observed.
  • The BSE calculations make specific spectral predictions: the most magnetization-reducing transitions are at low-energy THz frequencies for in-plane polarization and near 1200 nm for c-axis polarization, giving testable wavelengths for future experiments.
  • The reversibility of the ESR signal under dark recovery indicates a metastable local spin rearrangement rather than permanent damage, so repeated optical cycling should be possible at low temperature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The absence of an in-situ temperature reading in the ESR illumination run leaves open a thermal explanation: at 4 K the ESR intensity follows a 1/T Curie-like law, so a rise from 4 K toward ~17 K would mimic the observed ~77% intensity drop; the g-factor shift and line broadening partially argue against pure heating but do not eliminate it.
  • The dark-state g-factor of 2.0038 sits close to the free-electron value typical of carbon-based defect radicals, and the sample was synthesized in a graphite crucible; an ESR control on a sample prepared with a different carbon source would test whether the light-sensitive centers are Cr-related at all.
  • Since DFT finds the paramagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and ferromagnetic configurations nearly degenerate, chemical pressure, strain, or off-stoichiometry may be able to enlarge the dimer fraction or the trace-center population, turning a ppm-level effect into a macroscopic one—an extension the paper's design rationale implies but does not demonstrate.
  • A direct experimental check of the proposed spin-transfer mechanism would be time-resolved or pulsed ESR: if optical excitation transiently populates triplet states of the Cr-Cr dimers, a photo-induced triplet ESR spectrum distinct from the dark singlet signal should appear on the microsecond timescale.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports synthesis of the Cr2AlC MAX phase by high-pressure solid-state annealing and characterizes its magnetic and optomagnetic response by SQUID magnetometry, ESR, and DFT/BSE calculations. The authors identify Cr2AlC as a weak, field-linear metallic paramagnet with a dominant Pauli-like susceptibility, a non-monotonic contribution fitted with an antiferromagnetic Cr–Cr dimer model (J/kB = 760 K, about 15% of Cr sites), and a low-temperature Curie upturn from about 0.02% of S = 3/2 localized centers. SQUID magnetometry under red-light illumination shows no intrinsic macroscopic optomagnetic response beyond a small reversible heating effect. ESR at 4 K shows a reversible reduction of a dilute spin signal under AM1.5G illumination, which the authors attribute to light-induced spin redistribution between neighboring Cr sites with opposite local moments, supported by ai-BSE calculations and an MLWF-based ΔM analysis. The paper concludes that Cr2AlC is a weakly magnetic metal with an extremely dilute population of light-sensitive local centers.

Significance. If established, this hierarchy — Pauli-dominated bulk response, a sizeable AF dimer-like component, a trace Curie term, and a dilute optically responsive ESR population — would provide a useful reference for optomagnetic MAX/MXene design. The SQUID work is carefully executed: the compensating holder, differential Brillouin-function analysis, and the SI S1 heating calibration are clear strengths, and the red-light SQUID null result is well controlled. The ai-BSE calculations are detailed, with exciton lists and oscillator strengths supplied in the SI. However, the central optomagnetic claim rests on a single ESR illumination experiment in which heating and the chemical identity of the ESR centers are not sufficiently controlled, and the theoretical ΔM metric is an ad hoc proxy rather than a computed magnetization change. These issues prevent the current version from supporting the strong conclusion that the ESR response originates from light-induced spin redistribution on Cr centers.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Fig. 5 and §2.4] The ESR light-effect is not separated from illumination-induced heating. The paper reports no in-situ sample temperature during AM1.5G irradiation in the ESR setup; the only heating calibration (SI S1) applies to the SQUID red-LED geometry, not to the 100 mW cm−2 solar illumination of a 1 mg powder in He gas. Since the dark ESR intensity is consistent with a near-Curie 1/T law, the observed reduction of Nspin from 3.80×10^17 to 8.58×10^16 spins/g (ratio 0.226) corresponds to an effective temperature rise from 4 K to about 17.7 K. The g-factor shift (2.0038→2.0051) and line broadening (0.92→1.32 mT) are cited as evidence against pure heating, but no dark-state g(T) or ΔHpp(T) calibration is provided, so this evidence is not decisive. Please add an in-situ temperature monitor, measure dark ESR spectra over a temperature range covering at least 4–20 K, or provide a quantitative thermal mode
  2. [§3.3, Fig. 5 and §2.1] The assignment of the ESR centers to Cr is not sufficiently supported. The observed g = 2.0038 is close to the free-electron value and is typical of carbon/defect radicals; the sample is synthesized in a graphite crucible with graphite spacers, and XRD shows small amounts of Al2O3 or Cr7C3 impurities. The ESR signal corresponds to only ~0.0045% of Cr sites, so a trace carbonaceous or impurity phase could dominate. No control ESR measurements on the empty holder, graphite, or a similarly prepared sample are reported. Since the proposed mechanism (Eq. 2) is specifically Cr-based, the centers need to be identified by complementary methods — for example, variable-frequency ESR, spin concentration vs. Cr fraction, hyperfine studies, or chemical analysis — before the conclusion 'light-sensitive Cr centers' is drawn.
  3. [§3.2, Eq. (1)] The dimer analysis is a two-parameter fit, not an independent measurement. The values J/kB = 760(10) K and ξ = 0.15(1) (i.e., about 15% of Cr in AF dimers) are extracted by fitting the residual susceptibility after subtracting the Pauli and Curie terms; the same model is then used to interpret the non-monotonic contribution it was fitted to. A gently non-monotonic χ(T) can be parameterized by several models, so the specific claim that 15% of Cr sites form AF-coupled S = 1/2 dimers needs cross-validation (e.g., magnetic specific heat, neutron scattering, or an independent estimate of dimer density from sample disorder). Without this, the statement should be framed as an effective model rather than an established microscopic component of the magnetic hierarchy.
  4. [§3.3, Eq. (2)] The ΔM measure defined in Eq. (2) is a weighted sum of differences of MLWF projections onto Cr-centered Wannier functions; it is not the actual change of local magnetization in the optically excited state. The paper's transition from 'suggest' in §3.3 to 'can be ascribed' in the Conclusion relies on this proxy. Moreover, the BSE/MLWF calculation is performed for an AF-like Cr configuration, while DFT (Table S1) shows that the magnetic ground state is functional- and pseudopotential-dependent, with AF not robustly the ground state. Please either compute the spin-density change of the excited state directly, or explicitly label ΔM as a qualitative orbital-weight indicator and discuss the sensitivity of the mechanism to the assumed magnetic state.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.2] The display equation for Eq. (1) appears missing in the text between 'fitted with the expression:' and the following sentence; please ensure the Bleaney–Bowers dimer formula is shown and numbered correctly.
  2. [Table 1] The units in Table 1 are garbled: 'states·eV⁻¹·f.u.⁻¹' and 'states·eV⁻¹·Cr⁻¹' should be typeset with proper superscripts; the current rendering with double negative signs is confusing.
  3. [SI] The SI contains two sections numbered S4 ('Band structure calculated with the DFT' and 'Absorption spectra obtained with the ai-BSE'); renumber to S4 and S5 respectively.
  4. [Throughout] Minor typos: 'synthetized' should be 'synthesized' (e.g., Fig. 4 caption); reference [60] 'Scirpta Materialia' should be 'Scripta Materialia'; the model attributed to Bleaney and Bowers is usually called the Bleaney–Bowers dimer model, not 'Bleaney-Bleaney'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SQUID decomposition is an openly labeled fit, and the ESR/BSE comparison is an independent measurement-theory pairing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and no load-bearing step reduces to its inputs. The SQUID susceptibility decomposition is an explicitly labeled fitting exercise: the paper states that the residual χCr(T) is 'fitted with the expression' (Eq. 1) and reports that 'The least-squares fit ... yields an exchange energy of J/kB = 760(10) K and the Curie constant ...'. The dimer fraction ξ = 0.15(1) is therefore a fit output, not a disguised prediction; the paper never calls it a prediction. The low-T Curie component is quantified independently in SI S3 by differential Brillouin-function analysis of M(H) at 2, 5, and 8 K, so it is not defined via the dimer model. The ESR light response is an independent measurement (Nspin dark 3.80×10^17 vs 8.58×10^16 spins/g at 4 K), and the ai-BSE/MLWF ΔM calculation is not adjusted to any ESR datum; the paper presents it as a 'plausible microscopic mechanism' and says the calculations 'suggest' a redistribution, not that they reproduce the ESR number. Self-citations are methodological (SQUID protocols, ESR calibration procedures, prior calculation methods) and are not load-bearing for the physical conclusions; no uniqueness theorem or prior-work ansatz is invoked to force the interpretation. The absence of an in-situ temperature reading during the ESR illumination is an experimental-design/correctness concern (a 4→17 K heating would mimic the 77% intensity drop), but that is not circularity under the definition used here.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claims rest on two families of assumptions: measurement-interpretation choices (dimer model, DBFA temperature-independence, ESR center identity, impurity neglect) and theory-construction choices (AF reference state, 8-band Tamm-Dancoff e-h space, MLWF-proxy ΔM). The first family controls the quantitative numbers (15%, 760 K, 0.02%, 35 ppm); the second controls the mechanism conclusion. None of these is independently verified within the paper.

free parameters (4)
  • Dimer exchange coupling J/kB = 760(10) K
    Fitted via least-squares to the residual χCr(T) using the Bleaney-Bowers dimer expression, §3.2 Eq. (1). The model's susceptibility maximum (~950 K) lies outside the measured 2–400 K range.
  • Dimer Curie constant C (≡ Nd·g²·μB²/kB) = 1.60(2)×10⁻³ emu·K/g/Oe
    Fitted simultaneously with J; yields Nd = 6.4(2)×10²⁰/g and the headline ξ = 0.15(1) fraction of Cr in dimers (§3.2).
  • Concentration of S=3/2 localized centers nS = 1.5×10¹⁸ spins/g (~0.02% of Cr)
    From differential Brillouin-function analysis of 2/5/8 K isotherms, SI S3; the spin value itself is fit (S ≈ 1.45–1.55) with g fixed at 2.
  • Pauli susceptibility χP = 3.3×10⁻⁶ emu/g/Oe
    Extracted as the temperature-independent baseline after subtracting the fitted Curie and dimer components (§3.2, Fig. 4b); not an independent measurement.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The residual χCr(T) is governed by an isotropic-exchange dimer Hamiltonian H = -2J S1·S2 with two S=1/2 Cr ions
    Assumed in §3.2 to model the T-increasing susceptibility; alternatives (Stoner enhancement near a magnetic instability, impurity phases) are not tested.
  • domain assumption The dimer-forming Cr ions carry S=1/2 (local moment ≈ 1 μB as in the DFT AF solution)
    Invoked in §3.2 to convert the fitted C into a dimer count; the paper notes the formal oxidation state of Cr is not uniquely defined (ref 74).
  • domain assumption Non-paramagnetic magnetic background is temperature-independent between 2 and 8 K
    Central premise of the DBFA used in SI S3 to isolate the Curie component.
  • domain assumption The DFT-PBE AF solution is a valid reference for computing the optical transitions relevant to the light-sensitive centers
    Used in §2.5/§3.3 for the BSE; Table S1 shows PM/FM/AF are near-degenerate with the result depending on functional/pseudopotential/U, and the macroscopic state is paramagnetic.
  • ad hoc to paper The ΔM measure of Eq. (2), built from MLWF weight differences, represents the actual change of local Cr magnetization under an optical transition
    Defined in §3.3; it is a band-composition proxy, not a calculation of the excited-state spin density, and is presented as the basis for the mechanism conclusion.
  • domain assumption An e-h space of 8 bands with the Tamm-Dancoff approximation and a 12×12×4 k-grid captures the relevant optical response
    Numerical settings stated in §2.5 without convergence studies in the main text.
invented entities (2)
  • Antiferromagnetically coupled Cr–Cr dimers (≈15% of Cr sublattice)
    purpose: Explains the T-increasing, saturating susceptibility component in §3.2
    The dimers are inferred exclusively from the Bleaney-Bowers fit to the same susceptibility data used to build the claim; no independent probe (inelastic neutron scattering spin gap, specific heat anomaly, muSR) is provided. The only external anchor is the broad χ maximum of ref 34, which sits at 350–400 K vs the ~950 K maximum implied by the fitted exchange.
  • Reversibly light-sensitive ESR centers (≈35 ppm of Cr) independent evidence
    purpose: Accounts for the reversible light-induced ESR signal reduction in §3.3
    The ESR observables (g = 2.0038, ΔHpp = 0.92 mT, Nspin = 3.8×10¹⁷/g, reversibility, g-shift and broadening under light) are directly measurable and falsifiable outside the model; however, their chemical identity (Cr vs carbon/defect radical) and non-thermal response remain to be established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local magnetic correlations and light-sensitive centers in the Cr2AlC MAX phase." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SSGV7GOD

@misc{pith2026260715110,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local magnetic correlations and light-sensitive centers in the Cr2AlC MAX phase},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SSGV7GOD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15110}
}
read the original abstract

Cr2AlC MAX phase is synthesized by high-pressure solid-state annealing and investigated as a candidate platform for optically responsive magnetism. Structural characterization confirms the formation of the Cr2AlC phase, while magnetic and optical-magnetic properties are examined by superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometry, electron spin resonance (ESR), and first principles calculations. SQUID magnetometry identifies Cr 2AlC as a weak, field-linear metallic paramagnet dominated by Pauli-like susceptibility of itinerant Cr-derived states. Its non-monotonic temperature dependence is described by an additional contribution from antiferromagnetically coupled Cr-Cr dimers, whereas the low-temperature Curie-like upturn originates from only a trace population of localized Cr centers. Under red-light illumination, SQUID magnetometry does not reveal an intrinsic macroscopic optomagnetic response. In contrast, ESR at 4 K shows a reversible light-induced reduction of a local magnetic signal, but the optically modified spin population corresponds only to several tens of ppm of the Cr sublattice. Ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation (ai-BSE) calculations combined with the maximally localized Wannier function analysis suggest that optical excitation can redistribute spin polarization between neighboring Cr sites with the opposite local moments. The combined experiment-theory approach therefore establishes the hierarchy of magnetic contributions in Cr 2AlC and identifies the microscopic origin of its local optical sensitivity. This provides a reference for designing MAX phases and related MXenes in which defects, surface terminations or reduced dimensionality may enhance optically active magnetic states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15110 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Scheme of the ESR measurement setup. 2.5. Theoretical Tools Properties of the ground state such as the band structure, magnetic states and Bloch functions have been calculated with the density functional theory (DFT) [47,48] using the Quantum ESPRESSO package [49]. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) has been chosen according to the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhoff parameterization for the exchange-correlation funct… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Crystal structure of Cr2AlC. a) Atomic structure: side and top views for the periodic repetition of the elementary unit cell. Color legend: C – grey, Cr – green, Al – orange. b) Elementary cell with the 3D map of spin distribution, positive in red and negative in blue. c) SEM image of milled precursors mixture before heating. d) SEM image of synthesized Cr2AlC product after heating. After the synthesis, the obtained… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: d, have been done for the red-framed regions of the HRTEM images, and both analyses correspond to the two crystal directions. These characterization techniques reveal that the distances between planes are of 0.641 nm and 0.248 nm corresponding to the (002) and (100), r…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Magnetization of the Cr2AlC powder as a function of magnetic field H, measured at 300 K using the capsule compensating sample holder (CCSH) – full symbols – versus a test measurement of the empty capsule in the same CCSH – grey open symbols. b) Temperature dependenc…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Change of the local magnetization due to light excitation. a) ESR signals of Cr2AlC at 4 K with experimental procedure: in the dark state – blue line, under light irradiated for 1 h – red line, in the dark state for 1 h after the irradiation – green line. b) Comparison…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spin-bands projected at the MLWF centered at two Cr atoms with the local magnetization up and down. Color legend is common for all cases and truncated to the range [0.3,0.7] for a better contrast. a) Bands for spin up projected at Cr with local magnetic moment up, Cr↑.…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The normalized absorption spectrum obtained from the ai-BSE (blue line) and change of the local magnetization at all Cr atoms induced by an exciton of given energy (red bars) for the electric-field vectors: a) [1,0,0] and b) [0,0,1]. Color arrows point to the proper ax…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. Fang, C. Wu, Y . Zhang, Z. Li, Z. Zhou, Perspectives: Light Control of Magnetism and Device Development, ACS Nano 18 (2024) 8600‒8625, https://doi/10.1021/acsnano.3c13002

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c13002 2024

  2. [2]

    Beaurepaire, J.-C

    E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, J.-Y . Bigot, Ultrafast Spin Dynamics in Ferromagnetic Nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 4250‒4253, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4250

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.4250 1996

  3. [3]

    Kirilyuk, A.V

    A. Kirilyuk, A.V . Kimel, T. Rasing, Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 2731‒2784, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.2731 2010

  4. [4]

    Carva, M

    K. Carva, M. Battiato, P.M. Oppeneer, Ab Initio Investigation of the Elliott-Yafet Electron- Phonon Mechanism in Laser-Induced Ultrafast Demagnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 207201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.207201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.207201 2011

  5. [5]

    Tauchert, M

    S.R. Tauchert, M. V olkov, D. Ehberger, D. Kazenwadel, M. Evers, H. Lange, A. Donges, A. Book, W. Kreuzpaintner, U. Nowak, P. Baum, Polarized phonons carry angular momentum in ultrafast demagnetization, Nature 602 (2022) 73‒77, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04306-4

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04306-4 2022

  6. [6]

    Unikandanunni, R

    V . Unikandanunni, R. Medapalli, E.E. Fullerton, K. Carva, P.M. Oppeneer, S. Bonetti, Anisotropic ultrafast spin dynamics in epitaxial cobalt, Applied Physics Letters 118 (2021) 232404, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0049692

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0049692 2021

  7. [7]

    M. Haag, C. Illg, M. Fähnle, Role of electron-magnon scatterings in ultrafast demagnetization, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 014417, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.014417

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.014417 2014

  8. [8]

    Weißenhofer, P

    M. Weißenhofer, P. M. Oppeneer, Ultrafast Demagnetization Through Femtosecond Generation of Non-Thermal Magnons, Adv. Phys. Res. (2024) 2300103, https://doi.org/10.1002/apxr.202300103

    work page doi:10.1002/apxr.202300103 2024

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Battiato, K

    M. Battiato, K. Carva, P. M. Oppeneer, Superdiffusive Spin Transport as a Mechanism of Ultrafast Demagnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 027203, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.027203

    2010 doi

  2. [10]

    Hofherr et al., Ultrafast optically induced spin transfer in ferromagnetic alloys, Sci

    M. Hofherr et al., Ultrafast optically induced spin transfer in ferromagnetic alloys, Sci. Adv. 6 (2020) eaay8717, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay8717

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    Carva, P

    K. Carva, P. Baláž, and I. Radu, in Handbook of Magnetic Materials , V ol. 26, edited by E. Brück (Elsevier, 2017), pp. 291–463

    2017

  4. [12]

    Dewhurst, S

    J.K. Dewhurst, S. Shallcross, P. Elliott, S. Eisebitt, C. v. Korff Schmising, C. v. Korff, S. Sharma, Angular momentum redistribution in laser-induced demagnetization, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021) 054438, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.054438

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    von Korff Schmising, S

    C. von Korff Schmising, S. Jana, O. Zülich, D. Sommer, S. Eisebitt, Direct versus indirect excitation of ultrafast magnetization dynamics in FeNi alloys, Physical Review Research 6 (2024) 013270, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013270

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    M. S. Mrudul, P. M. Oppeneer, Ab initio investigation of laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization of FePt: Intensity dependence and importance of electron coherence, Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) 144418, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.144418

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Jungwirth, X

    T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nature Nanotech 11 (2016) 231–241, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.18

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    J. H. Mentink, J. Hellsvik, D.V . Afanasiev, B.A. Ivanov, A. Kirilyuk, A.V . Kimel, O. Eriksson, M.I. Katsnelson, Th. Rasing, Ultrafast Spin Dynamics in Multisublattice Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 057202, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.057202

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    S.-E. Lee, Y . W. Windsor, A. Fedorov, K. Kliemt, C. Krellner, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, M. Wolf, U. Atxitia, D. V . Vyalikh, L. Rettig, Robust Magnetic Order Upon Ultrafast Excitation of an Antiferromagnet, Advanced Materials Interfaces 9 (2022) 2201340, https://doi...

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    Y . W. Windsor, A. Ernst, K. Kummer, K. Kliemt, Ch. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, U. Staub, E. V . Chulkov, C. Krellner, D. V . Vyalikh, L. Rettig, Deterministic control of an antiferromagnetic spin arrangement using ultrafast optical excitation, Communications Physics 3 (2...

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Hamara, M

    D. Hamara, M. Strungaru, J.R. Massey, et al. Ultra-high spin emission from antiferromagnetic FeRh, Nature Communications 15 (2024) 4958, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48795-z

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    Kašpar, M

    Z. Kašpar, M. Surýnek, J. Zubáč, F. Krizek, V . Novák, R.P. Campion, M.S. Wörnle, P. Gambardella, X. Marti, P. Němec, K.W. Edmonds, S. Reimers, O.J. Amin, F. Maccherozzi, S.S. Dhesi, P. Wadley, J. Wunderlich, K. Olejník, T. Jungwirth, Quenching of an antiferromagnet into high ...

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Freimuth, S

    F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, and Y . Mokrousov, Laser-induced torques in metallic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021) 174429, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.174429

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Dannegger, M

    T. Dannegger, M. Berritta, K. Carva, S. Selzer, U. Ritzmann, P.M. Oppeneer, U. Nowak, Ultrafast coherent all-optical switching of an antiferromagnet with the inverse Faraday effect, Physical Review B 104 (2021) L060413, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.L060413

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Kubitza, C

    N. Kubitza, C. Büchner, J. Sinclair, R. M. Snyder, and C. S. Birkel, Extending the Chemistry of Layered Solids and Nanosheets: Chemistry and Structure of MAX Phases, MAB Phases and Mxenes, ChemPlusChem 88 (2023) e202300214, https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.202300214

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Fu, N.Wang, D

    Z. Fu, N.Wang, D. Legut, C. Si, Q. Zhang, S. Du, T.C. Germann, J.S. Francisco, R. Zhang, Rational Design of Flexible Two-Dimensional MXenes with Multiple Functionalities, Chem Rev. 119 (2019) 11980‒12031, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00348

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    Khazaei, A

    M. Khazaei, A. Ranjbar, M. Arai, T. Sasaki, S. Yunoki, Electronic properties and applications of MXenes: a theoretical review, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 5 (2017) 2488, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC00140A

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    X. Lin, W. Yang, K. L. Wang, and W. Zhao, Two-dimensional spintronics for low-power electronics, Nature Electronics 2 (2019) 274‒283, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-019-0273-7

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Hirohata, K

    A. Hirohata, K. Yamadab, Y . Nakatanic, I.-L. Prejbeanud, B. Diényd, P. Pirroe, B. Hillebrands, Review on spintronics: Principles and device applications, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 509 (2020) 166711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166711

    2020

  20. [28]

    Gibertini, M

    M. Gibertini, M. Koperski, A.F. Morpurgo, K.S. Novoselov, Magnetic 2D materials and heterostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 (2019) 408 ‒419, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0438- 6

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    Hantanasirisakul, B

    K. Hantanasirisakul, B. Anasori, S. Nemsak, J.L. Hart, J. Wu, Y . Yang, R.V . Chopdekar, P. Shafer, A.F. May, E.J. Moon, J. Zhou, Q. Zhang, M.L. Taheri, S.J. May, Y . Gogotsi, Evidence of a magnetic transition in atomically thin Cr2TiC2Tx Mxene, Nanoscale Horizons 5 (2020) 155...

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    Iqbal, J

    M. Iqbal, J. Fatheema, Q. Noor, M. Rani, M. Mumtaz, R.-K. Zheng, S.A. Khan, S. Rizwan, Co-existence of magnetic phases in two-dimensional Mxene, Materials Today Chemistry 16 (2020) 100271, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100271

    2020

  23. [31]

    Jaouen, P

    M. Jaouen, P. Chartier, T. Cabioc'h, V . Mauchamp, G. André, M. Viret, Invar Like Behavior of the Cr2AlC MAX Phase at Low Temperature, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 96: 3872 ‒3876, https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12635

    doi

  24. [32]

    Dahlqvist, B

    M. Dahlqvist, B. Alling, I. A. Abrikosov, J. Rosen, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 220403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.220403

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    Sobolev, K.K

    K.V . Sobolev, K.K. Kolincio, A. Emelyanov, A. Mielewczyk-Gryń, M. Gazda, M. Roman, A. Pazniak, V . Rodionov, Evolution of magnetic and transport properties in (Cr 1−xMnx)2AlC MAX- phase synthesized by arc melting technique, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 493 (202...

    2020

  26. [34]

    Sobolev, H

    K. Sobolev, H. Pazniak, M. Farle, V . Rodionova, and U. Wiedwald, Synthesis, phase purification and magnetic characterization of the (Cr 1-x,Mnx)2AlC MAX-phase, Journal of Materials Chemistry C 9 (2021) 16516, https://doi.org/ 10.1039/d1tc03092b

    2021 doi

  27. [35]

    Gonzalez-Julian, S

    J. Gonzalez-Julian, S. Onrubia, M. Bram, O. Guillon, Effect of sintering method on the microstructure of pure Cr 2AlC MAX phase ceramics, J. Ceram. Soc. Jap. 124 (2016) 415–420, https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.15263

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    Azina, M

    C. Azina, M. Poll, D.M. Holzapfel, E. Tailleur, A. Zuber, S. Dubois, P. Eklund, J. Gonzalez- Julian, Microstructural and compositional design of Cr 2AlC MAX phases and their impact on oxidation resistance, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 44 (2024) 4895–4904, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeur...

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Sierakowski, R

    K. Sierakowski, R. Jakiela, B. Lucznik, P. Kwiatkowski, M. Iwinska, M. Turek, H. Sakurai, T. Kachi, M Bockowski, High Pressure Processing of Ion Implanted GaN, Electronics 9 (2020) 1380, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9091380

    2020 doi

  30. [39]

    Gas and M

    K. Gas and M. Sawicki, In Situ Compensation Method for Precise Integral SQUID Magnetometry of Miniscule Biological, Chemical, and Powder Specimens Requiring the Use of Capsules, Materials 15, 2 (2022)

    2022

  31. [44]

    Reciprocating Sample Option (RSO) – Theory of Operation and Measurement Modes,

    Quantum Design Application Note 1014-201 , “Reciprocating Sample Option (RSO) – Theory of Operation and Measurement Modes,” Quantum Design Inc., San Diego, CA

  32. [45]

    Marumoto, T

    K. Marumoto, T. Fujimori, M. Ito, T. Mori, Advanced Energy Materials 2 (2012) 591 ‒597, https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100774

    2012 doi

  33. [46]

    Nagamori, K

    T. Nagamori, K. Marumoto, Direct Observation of Hole Accumulation in Polymer Solar Cells During Device Operation using Light-Induced Electron Spin Resonance, Advanced Materials 25 (2013) 2362-2367, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201204015

    2013 doi

  34. [47]

    Hohenberg, W

    P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, Phys. Rev. B 136 (1964) B864-B871, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864

    1964 doi

  35. [48]

    Kohn, L.J

    W. Kohn, L.J. Sham, Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects, Phys. Rev. B 140 (1965) A1133‒A1138, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

    1965 doi

  36. [49]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G.L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 21 (2009) 395502, h...

    2009 doi

  37. [50]

    Perdew, K

    J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3865–3868, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865

    1996 doi

  38. [51]

    Monkhorst, J.D

    H.J. Monkhorst, J.D. Pack, Special Points for Brillouin-Zone Integrations, Physical Review B, 13 (1976) 5188-5192, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

    1976 doi

  39. [52]

    Salpeter , H.A

    E.E. Salpeter , H.A. Bethe , A relativistic equation for bound-state problems. Phys. Rev. 84 (1951) 1232–1242, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.84.1232

    1951 doi

  40. [53]

    Marini, C

    A. Marini, C. Hogan, M. Grüning, D. Varsano, Yambo: an ab initio tool for excited state calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1392−1403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.02.003

    2009 doi

  41. [54]

    Sangalli, A

    D. Sangalli, A. Ferretti, H. Miranda, C. Attaccalite, I. Marri, E. Cannuccia, P. Melo, M. Marsili, F. Paleari, A. Marrazzo, Many-body perturbation theory calculations using the yambo code, J. Phys. Cond. Matter. 31 (2019) 325902, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab15d0

    2019 doi

  42. [55]

    Taylor, Tamm-Dancoff Method, Phys

    J.C. Taylor, Tamm-Dancoff Method, Phys. Rev. 95 (1954) 1313−1317, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.1313

    1954 doi

  43. [56]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2001) 035109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109

    2001 doi

  44. [57]

    Marzari, A.A

    N. Marzari, A.A. Mostofi, J.R. Yates, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 1419, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1419

    2012 doi

  45. [58]

    Pizzi, et al

    G. Pizzi, et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys. Cond. Mater. 32 (2020) 165902, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab51ff

    2020 doi

  46. [59]

    Jeitschko, H

    W. Jeitschko, H. Nowotny, Die Kristallstruktur von Ti 3SiC2—ein neuer Komplexcarbid-Typ , Monatsh. Chem. 98 (1967) 329, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00899949

    1967 doi

  47. [60]

    J. Yuan, S. Zhou, H. Wu, Z. Wang, Y . Zhang, G. Zhou, G. Ma, P. Ke, A. Wang, Ultrahigh strength-ductility of nanocrystalline Cr2AlC coating under micropillar compression, Scipta Materialia, 235 (2023) 115594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115594

    2023

  48. [61]

    Z. Wang, G. Ma, L. Liu, L. Wang, P. Ke, Q. Xue, A. Wang, High-performance Cr 2AlC MAX phase coatings: Oxidation mechanisms in the 900–1100°C temperature range, Corrosion Science, 167 (2020) 108492, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108492

    2020

  49. [62]

    Sharma, O.P

    P. Sharma, O.P. Pandey, Thermal kinetics involved during the solid-state synthesis of Cr 2AlC MAX phase. J Therm Anal Calorim,143 (2021) 3997–4008, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020- 09390-8

    2021 doi

  50. [63]

    Bain and John F

    Gordon A. Bain and John F. Berry, Diamagnetic Corrections and Pascal’ s Constants, Journal of Chemical Education, 85 (2008) 532

    2008

  51. [64]

    Phys.: Conf

    Zhongsheng Liu, Kenta Takao, Takeshi Waki, Yoshikazu Tabata and Hiroyuki Nakamura, Electron correlation in Pauli paramagnetic Cr2AlC, Cr2GaC and Cr2GeC, 2017 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 868 012016; DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/868/1/012016

    2017 doi

  52. [65]

    Pacuski, P

    W. Pacuski, P. Kossacki, D. Ferrand, A. Golnik, J. Cibert, M. Wegscheider, A. Navarro- Quezada, A. Bonanni, M. Kiecana, M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, Observation of Strong-Coupling Effects in a Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ga1-xFexN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 037204 (2008)

    2008

  53. [66]

    Z. Liu, T. Waki, Y . Tabata, and H. Nakamura, Mn-doping-induced itinerant-electron ferromagnetism in Cr2GeC, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 054435

    2014

  54. [67]

    Hamm, Joshua D

    Christin M. Hamm, Joshua D. Bocarsly, Gareth Seward, Ulrike I. Kramm and Christina S. Birkel, Non-conventional synthesis and magnetic properties of MAX phases (Cr/Mn)2AlC and (Cr/Fe)2AlC, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5, 5700; DOI: 10.1039/c7tc00112f

    2017 doi

  55. [71]

    Gas and M

    K. Gas and M. Sawicki, Reliable Magnetometry for Antiferromagnets and Thin Films: Correcting Substrate Artifacts in Mn3Sn/MgO Systems, Phys. Rev. Appl., 25, 014012 (2026). Supporting information Local magnetic correlations and light-sensitive centers in the Cr2AlC MAX phase Ma...

    2026

  56. [72]

    Anomalous paramagnetism of copper acetate

    Bleaney, B.; Bowers, K.D. Anomalous paramagnetism of copper acetate . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1952, 214, 451–465

    1952

  57. [73]

    C. J. O’Connor, Magnetochemistry-Advances in Theory and Experimentation , Progress in Inorganic Chemistry; Vol 29, Edited by Stephen J. Lippard, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1982)

    1982

  58. [74]

    Frenking, Heretical thoughts about the present understanding and description of the chemical bond

    G. Frenking, Heretical thoughts about the present understanding and description of the chemical bond. Molecular Physics, 121 (9–10) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2022 . 2110168 References in Supporting Information

    2022

  59. [75]

    Available online: https://www.cmr-direct.com/en/cmr-gevar-25ml?filter_name=ge %20varnis (accessed on 12 October 2022)., (n.d.)

    The GE/IMI 7031 Varnish Is Obtained from Cambridge Magnetic Refrigeration, Cambridge, CB5 8HR, UK. Available online: https://www.cmr-direct.com/en/cmr-gevar-25ml?filter_name=ge %20varnis (accessed on 12 October 2022)., (n.d.)

    2022

  60. [76]

    Sawicki, W

    M. Sawicki, W. Stefanowicz, and A. Ney, Sensitive SQUID magnetometry for studying nanomagnetism, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26, 064006 (2011)

    2011

  61. [77]

    Nur Amanina Juniasari Tun Nur Iskandar, Yeap Guan Yeow, Nobuyuki Maeta, Masato M. Ito, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Katarzyna Gas and Maciej Sawicki, Anisotropic and magnetic properties in non-metal and non-radical organic aggregates of tri-substituted phenyl derivatives , New J. Chem....

    2020 doi

  62. [78]

    Świątkowski, S

    M. Świątkowski, S. Lanka, A. Czylkowska, K. Gas, M. Sawicki, Structural, Spectroscopic, Thermal, and Magnetic Properties of a New Dinuclear Copper Coordination Compound with Tiglic Acid, Materials, 14, 2148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092148

    2021 doi

  63. [79]

    Rogalewicz, A

    B. Rogalewicz, A. Climova, E. Pivovarova, J. Sukiennik, K. Czarnecka, P. Szymański, M. Szczesio, K. Gas, M. Sawicki, M. Pitucha, and A. Czylkowska, Antitumor Activity and Physicochemical Properties of New Thiosemicarbazide Derivative and Its Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and ...

    2022 doi

  64. [80]

    Reciprocating Sample Option (RSO) – Theory of Operation and Measurement Modes,

    Quantum Design Application Note 1014-201, “Reciprocating Sample Option (RSO) – Theory of Operation and Measurement Modes,” Quantum Design Inc., San Diego, CA. S2. Magnetic phases obtained from the DFT and their relative total energies Definitions of magnetic moments via the sp...

  65. [81]

    Pacuski, P

    W. Pacuski, P. Kossacki, D. Ferrand, A. Golnik, J. Cibert, M. Wegscheider, A. Navarro-Quezada, A. Bonanni, M. Kiecana, M. Sawicki, and T. Dietl, Observation of Strong-Coupling Effects in a Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ga1-xFexN, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 037204 (2008)

    2008

  66. [82]

    Navarro-Quezada, K

    A. Navarro-Quezada, K. Gas, T. Truglas, V . Bauernfeind, M. Matzer, D. Kreil, A. Ney, H. Groiss, M. Sawicki, and A. Bonanni, Out-of-Plane Magnetic Anisotropy in Ordered Ensembles of FeyN Nanocrystals Embedded in GaN, Materials 13, 3294 (2020)

    2020

  67. [83]

    K. Gas, A. Królicka, K. Dybko, P. Nowicki, Z. Khosravizadeh, T. Story, and M. Sawicki, Magnetic constitution of topologically trivial thermoelectric PbTe:Cr, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 537, 168154 (2021)

    2021

  68. [84]

    K. Gas, J. Sadowski, and M. Sawicki, Magnetic properties of wurtzite (Ga,Mn)As, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 533, 168012 (2021)

    2021

  69. [85]

    U” and/or down denoted “D

    K. Gas and M. Sawicki, Reliable Magnetometry for Antiferromagnets and Thin Films: Correcting Substrate Artifacts in Mn3Sn/MgO Systems, Phys. Rev. Appl., 25, 014012 (2026). S4. Band structure calculated with the DFT Table S2. List of the high symmetry points in the Brillouin zo...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.