Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 105 references

Gyrotropy from Extrinsic Geometry in Twisted Materials

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Twisted bilayers can show optical gyrotropy from geometry alone, even with zero interlayer coupling.

desk verdict Clean separation of geometric vs coherence gyrotropy in twisted bilayers, with a genuine BM-frame correction; the observable mapping is borrowed but well-grounded. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15189 v1 pith:BE7IHZES submitted 2026-07-16 cond-mat.mes-hall

Spenser Talkington , Eugene J Mele This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall PACS 78.20.Ek73.22.Pr
keywords gyrotropytwistedbilayergrapheneopticalactivityinterlayercoherenceextrinsicgeometryBistritzer-MacDonaldframeMoTe2heterostrain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper separates two sources of optical gyrotropy in twisted bilayers: an intrinsic one from interlayer electronic coherence and an extrinsic one from the real-space twist geometry. It shows that with threefold rotation and time-reversal symmetry (as in twisted bilayer graphene), the geometric contribution vanishes and any gyrotropy must be coherence-driven. In a classical wire-array model and in twisted MoTe2 with heterostrain and a displacement field, the geometric contribution dominates. A key finding is that conductivities computed in the usual Bistritzer-MacDonald local frame contain a spurious linear-in-twist term that is absent in the measurable lab frame. The paper concludes that interlayer coherence is generically not responsible for the full chiral optical response.

What carries the argument

The key object is the layer-resolved conductivity matrix and its decomposition into total, counterflow, and chiral (σ^c) components; σ^c_xy is the gyrotropy. The argument runs on symmetry identities: with C3z and T, σ^c_xy = 2σ^BT_xy (Eq. 5), which forces the geometric part to vanish in TBG, and an accidental antiunitary layer-exchange symmetry Λ in the single-sublattice MoTe2 model which forces σ^BT_xy = 0. The frame transformation between lab and Bistritzer-MacDonald frames (Eqs. 15–17) isolates the spurious θ-linear gyrotropy.

What would settle it

Measure the circular-dichroism or polarization-rotation spectrum of a twisted bilayer with a large interlayer separation (negligible tunneling). In TBG, Eq. (5) predicts zero gyrotropy; in a wire-array or strained MoTe2 setup, it predicts a θ-linear signal that survives as tunneling→0. A finite signal in TBG with suppressed tunneling, or a vanishing signal in the strained MoTe2 decoupled limit, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that gyrotropy—the linear-in-wavevector chiral optical conductivity—can arise purely from extrinsic twist geometry in time-reversal-symmetric bilayers, independent of interlayer coupling. For systems with C3z and T, the chiral conductivity σ^c_xy equals 2σ^BT_xy, so it vanishes when layers are decoupled; twisted bilayer graphene's gyrotropy is therefore entirely intrinsic. The paper demonstrates the opposite in a decoupled wire bilayer, where θ-linear gyrotropy appears, and in twisted MoTe2 with heterostrain and displacement field, where the geometric (decoupled-layer) contribution dominates over the coherent one. It also shows that the Bistritzer-MacDonald frame and the

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the layer-counterflow conductivity σ^c_xy with physically measurable optical gyrotropy assumes the thin-film magnetoelectric decomposition applies; if that mapping fails for decoupled layers, the geometric gyrotropy is a bookkeeping artifact rather than a real optical rotation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In twisted bilayer graphene, any measured gyrotropy at charge neutrality and low doping is a direct signature of interlayer coherence, since the geometric contribution is symmetry-forbidden.
  • Conductivity calculations in the Bistritzer-MacDonald frame overestimate gyrotropy by a linear-in-twist term; lab-frame evaluation is required for comparison with experiment.
  • Pristine twisted MoTe2 has exactly zero gyrotropy in the single-sublattice continuum model; observation of gyrotropy implies symmetry breaking such as strain or displacement field.
  • With weak heterostrain and a displacement field, twisted MoTe2 develops a gyrotropy dominated by the extrinsic geometric response, not interlayer tunneling.
  • The separation of intrinsic and extrinsic contributions should be applied to other twisted materials' optical and transport properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The wire-array result suggests that any pair of twisted anisotropic conductors—including classical metamaterials—should exhibit geometric gyrotropy; this could be tested with macroscopic twisted wire grids.
  • If the frame-difference result is right, earlier Bistritzer-MacDonald-frame predictions of chiral optical response in TBG may need re-evaluation where they rely on linear-in-θ terms.
  • The exact vanishing in pristine MoTe2 relies on the accidental layer-exchange symmetry of the single-sublattice model; including both Mo and Te sublattices or in-plane relaxation would likely lift the zero and produce a small intrinsic gyrotropy.
  • Extending to thicker twisted stacks, where curvature and torsion are richer, may reveal embedding-dependent gyrotropy beyond the bilayer case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a layer-resolved decomposition of the optical conductivity of twisted bilayers into total, counterflow, and chiral (σ^c_xy) components, and argues that the chiral component — the gyrotropy — contains two physically distinct contributions: one intrinsic, tied to interlayer electronic coherence, and one extrinsic, fixed by the real-space embedding/geometry of the layers. The symmetry analysis shows that with C3z and time reversal the gyrotropy requires interlayer tunneling (Eq. 5); a classical bilayer of 1D wires with zero interlayer coupling nevertheless displays a linear-in-θ geometric gyrotropy (Eq. 8). For TBG the authors find that the lab-frame and Bistritzer-MacDonald-frame conductivities differ by a linear-in-θ term (Eq. 17) and that the physical lab-frame gyrotropy is entirely coherent. For twisted bilayer MoTe2 they show an exact vanishing in the pristine single-sublattice continuum model and a dominant geometric gyrotropy once weak heterostrain and a displacement field are applied.

Significance. Should the results hold, the paper offers a clean and useful diagnostic: gyrotropy can serve as a selective probe of interlayer coherence in symmetric twisted bilayers, while in strained/displaced TMDs it is dominated by extrinsic geometry. The symmetry algebra is internally consistent; Eq. (5) and the BM-frame transformation Eq. (17) are non-trivial and correctly capture a subtle basis dependence. The numerical implementation is carefully checked (N=2 vs N=3,4; 60×60 mesh) and the code is public, which aids reproducibility. The quantitative predictions for decoupled TBG (zero gyrotropy) and pristine MoTe2 (zero gyrotropy) are falsifiable. The main caveat is that the observable mapping of σ^c_xy is inherited from previous magnetoelectric thin-film theories.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (2); Sec. III, Eq. (8)] The central identification of σ^c_xy with the measurable q_z-linear optical gyrotropy is asserted via Refs. [17,18,31,39] but not derived in this paper. In the decoupled wire model, the geometric effect exists as a property of the current-basis decomposition; the physical polarization rotation also involves the layer separation d_z and, in general, the second chiral block σ^c'_xy. I ask the authors to state explicitly which combination of σ^c_xy, σ^c'_xy, and d_z enters the lab-frame rotation/ellipticity, and to include a short derivation or a precise statement that this is the standard Stauber/Thouless convention. This matters for the claim that Eq. (8) describes an observable geometric gyrotropy rather than a bookkeeping artifact of the current basis.
  2. [Sec. V.D, Fig. 4(d)] In the strained/displaced TMD calculation the response is reported only as σ^c_xy. Unlike the C3z-symmetric case (where σ^c'_xy = -σ^c_xy), under heterostrain the two chiral blocks are not simply related, and the measured optical activity may depend on a combination that is not shown. Please specify the relation between the plotted σ^c_xy and the observable rotation, or justify that σ^c_xy alone is the relevant gyrotropy in this symmetry class. Without this, the quantitative statement that the geometric contribution dominates is not fully closed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. I] The claim that the geometric gyrotropy is 'independent of the structure of the electronic states' is too strong: in the wire model the magnitude is set by σ_2D_xx, and the effect vanishes for an isotropic monolayer. I suggest tempering the wording to 'independent of interlayer electronic coherence'.
  2. [Sec. III, Eq. (7)] The notation σ_BB = σ2D is ambiguous. Please write σ_BB = σ_2D_xx \hat{x}\hat{x} to make explicit that only the xx component is nonzero.
  3. [Fig. 2 caption] The extracted caption text appears garbled ('vary couplingdb ce'); please check the figure caption for typographical errors before resubmission.
  4. [Sec. IV.C] The statement that replacing σ^l_α with σ_α 'misses the entire linear-in-θ contribution as first identified in [16]' is helpful. It would be even clearer to show the order-θ cancellation explicitly for the transverse component, since that is the main point of the frame comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain is self-contained, and self-citations are only background.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs. Eq. (5) (sigma^c_xy = 2 sigma^BT_xy under C3z and T) follows algebraically from the layer-basis transformation Eq. (3), the valley structure of the C3z eigenvalues, and Onsager reciprocity, all stated in the text; no fitted parameter enters. The wire-model geometric gyrotropy Eq. (8) is a direct evaluation of the layer-rotated conductivity tensors in Eqs. (6)-(7) with zero interlayer coupling, so it is a model calculation, not a fit to gyrotropy data. The lab-frame versus BM-frame result Eq. (17) is a rotation transformation of the conductivity matrix using HH^T = H^T H = 2, again self-contained. The pristine MoTe2 vanishing follows from the accidental scalar layer-exchange symmetry Lambda, Eq. (19), applied to the explicit single-sublattice continuum Hamiltonian; the strained/displaced response is computed from the Kubo formula with external literature parameters (t_perp, V, psi, m*, strain, displacement), none of which are fitted to the gyrotropy. Self-citations (Refs. 24-27, 30, 78, 85, 90, 93, 95, 97, 100) appear only in background and outlook contexts and are not load-bearing for the central derivations. The identification of sigma^c_xy with measurable thin-film optical gyrotropy is imported from external works [17,18,31,39]; that is independent support, and if it were wrong it would be a modeling/correctness risk, not a circular reduction. No enumerated circularity pattern is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard linear-response theory and widely used continuum models; no new entities are invented. The model parameters (θ, t⊥, V, m*, strain, D) are external inputs or control knobs, not fitted to produce the gyrotropy. The main load-bearing modeling input is the counterflow-current identification with optical gyrotropy, plus the accidental Λ symmetry in the pristine TMD model.

free parameters (5)
  • Twist angle θ = 2° (TBG), 5° (MoTe2)
    Physical system parameter, not fitted; the linear-in-θ geometric term is the object of study, and any small nonzero angle would work.
  • Interlayer tunneling t⊥ = 0.11 eV (TBG), −8.5 meV (MoTe2)
    Literature values; the t⊥=0 limit is used to define geometric gyrotropy.
  • Broadening η and temperature T = η=20 meV, T=77 K (TBG); η=5 meV, T=10 K (MoTe2)
    Chosen for smooth spectra; not fitted to the target response.
  • Heterostrain and displacement field = ϵ=0.1%; D≈0.01–0.1 V/nm
    Control parameters in MoTe2; chosen to weakly break C3z and layer exchange.
  • Moiré reciprocal cutoff N = N=2
    Truncation of reciprocal lattice; authors verified N=3,4 change gyrotropy by <1%.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Kubo linear-response formula (Eq. 14) with layer-resolved current operators is the correct response theory.
    Standard linear-response framework; no alternative response theory is considered.
  • domain assumption C3z and time-reversal symmetries hold for ideal twisted bilayer graphene and MoTe2.
    Used throughout Sections II, IV, V; valid away from spontaneous symmetry breaking.
  • domain assumption Bistritzer-MacDonald continuum model (Eqs. 9-13) captures TBG low-energy physics at 2°.
    Used for all TBG results; accuracy depends on this widely used model.
  • domain assumption Single-sublattice TMD continuum model of Wu et al. (Eqs. 9, 18) captures MoTe2, including the accidental layer-exchange symmetry Λ (Eq. 19).
    Used for all MoTe2 results; the exact vanishing relies on Λ, which may be broken in real materials.
  • domain assumption The counterflow/chiral layer conductivity σ^c_xy is the thin-film magnetoelectric gyrotropy observable in the lab.
    Imported from Refs. [17,18,31]; this identification is the bridge from layer-resolved currents to optical activity.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gyrotropy from Extrinsic Geometry in Twisted Materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BE7IHZES

@misc{pith2026260715189,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gyrotropy from Extrinsic Geometry in Twisted Materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BE7IHZES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15189}
}
read the original abstract

Gyrotropy in twisted bilayer graphene can be used as a signature of interlayer electronic coherence. Gyrotropy can emerge in the absence of interlayer coupling in time-reversal symmetric bilayer systems. This gyrotropy originates from the extrinsic geometry associated with the physical geometry of the system and is independent of the structure of the electronic states. We first illustrate this effect for a purely classical bilayer array of one-dimensional wires. Next we study twisted bilayer graphene and show that the gyrotropy is entirely due to interlayer coherence. In doing so we observe that conductivities calculated in the Bistritzer-MacDonald frame differ significantly from conductivities measurable in the lab frame. Finally we consider twisted bilayer MoTe2, first as a pristine model where the gyrotropy exactly vanishes, and then with weak strain and displacement fields where we show that the geometric gyrotropy can dominate the coherent gyrotropy. Our results call attention to the necessity to separate the contribution of extrinsic physical geometry from the contribution of intrinsic electronic states to the properties of twisted materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15189 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A bilayer array of classical wires with relative twist [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Chiral optical activity can appear in twisted bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Suarez-Morell, J

    E. Suarez-Morell, J. D. Correa, P. Vargas, M. Pacheco, and Z. Barticevic, Flat bands in slightly twisted bilayer graphene: Tight-binding calculations, Phys. Rev. B82, 121407 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    G. T. de Laissardiere, D. Mayou, and L. Magaud, Local- ization of Dirac electrons in rotated graphene bilayers, Nano Lett.10, 804 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    total” electric dipole type currentj tot =j T +j B and layer anti- symmetric “counterflow

    and conductivities calculated in the lab frame. Finally we consider twisted bilayer MoTe 2 as a representative example of a twisted TMD, and show conditions under which gyrotropy can emerge. We demonstrate that small heterostrain and a displacement field allow gyrotropy and it is almost entirely extrinsic/independent of interlayer coupling. Overall we ide...

    arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moire bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 12233 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional su- perconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science363, 1059 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, et al., Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene super- lattices, Nature556, 80 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Y. Cao, D. Chowdhury, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies- Bigorda, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near Planckian dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076801 (2020)

    2020

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    L. Wang, E. M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, L. Xian, D. A. Rhodes, C. Tan, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, Y. Bai, B. Kim, et al., Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Mater. 19, 861 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V. Crepel, Y. Zhang, and L. Fu, Magic in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Nat. Commun.12, 6730 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, T. Senthil, E. Tutuc, A. Yaz- dani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moire materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 201 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Suarez-Morell and L

    E. Suarez-Morell and L. E. F. Torres, Radiation effects on the electronic properties of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B86, 125449 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    C. J. Tabert and E. J. Nicol, Optical conductivity of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B87, 121402 (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    Stauber, P

    T. Stauber, P. San-Jose, and L. Brey, Optical conduc- tivity, Drude weight and plasmons in twisted graphene bilayers, New J. Phys.15, 113050 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    Moon and M

    P. Moon and M. Koshino, Optical absorption in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B87, 205404 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    C. J. Kim, A. Sanchez-Castillo, Z. Ziegler, Y. Ogawa, C. Noguez, and J. Park, Chiral atomically thin films, Nat. Nanotechnol.11, 520 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Suarez-Morell, L

    E. Suarez-Morell, L. Chico, and L. Brey, Twisting Dirac fermions: circular dichroism in bilayer graphene, 2D Mater.4, 035015 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Stauber, T

    T. Stauber, T. Low, and G. Gomez-Santos, Chiral re- sponse of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 046801 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    Stauber, T

    T. Stauber, T. Low, and G. Gomez-Santos, Linear re- sponse of twisted bilayer graphene: Continuum versus tight-binding models, Phys. Rev. B98, 195414 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    Addison, J

    Z. Addison, J. Park, and E. J. Mele, Twist, slip, and cir- cular dichroism in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B100, 125418 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    V. N. Do, H. A. Le, V. D. Nguyen, and D. Bercioux, Op- tical Hall response of bilayer graphene: Manifestation of chiral hybridized states in broken mirror symmetry lat- tices, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043281 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    S. T. Ho and V. N. Do, Optical activity and transport in twisted bilayer graphene: Spatial dispersion effects, Phys. Rev. B107, 195141 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    X. M. Qiu, N. Yang, W. Chu, and J. Y. Yan, Detection of the chirality of twisted bilayer graphene by the optical absorption, Phys. Rev. B109, 125419 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Shallcross, S

    S. Shallcross, S. Sharma, and O. A. Pankratov, Quan- tum interference at the twist boundary in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 056803 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    E. J. Mele, Commensuration and interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B81, 161405 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    E. J. Mele, Interlayer coupling in rotationally faulted multilayer graphenes, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.45, 154004 (2012)

    2012

  19. [27]

    Talkington and E

    S. Talkington and E. J. Mele, Electric-field-tunable band gap in commensurate twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B107, L041408 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Talkington and E

    S. Talkington and E. J. Mele, Terahertz Circular Dichro- ism in Commensurate Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. B108, 085421 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Huang, X

    T. Huang, X. Tu, C. Shen, B. Zheng, J. Wang, H. Wang, K. Khaliji, S. H. Park, Z. Liu, T. Yang, et al., Obser- vation of chiral and slow plasmons in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature605, 63 (2022). 9

    2022

  22. [30]

    S. Lan, X. Liu, S. Wang, H. Zhu, Y. Liu, C. Gong, S. Yang, J. Shi, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Observation of strong excitonic magneto-chiral anisotropy in twisted bilayer van der Waals crystals, Nat. Commun.12, 2088 (2021)

  23. [31]

    B. Kim, J. Jin, Z. Wang, L. He, T. Christensen, E. J. Mele, and B. Zhen, Three-dimensional nonlinear optical materials from twisted two-dimensional van der Waals interfaces, Nat. Photonics18, 91 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    D. X. Nguyen and D. T. Son, Electrodynam- ics of thin sheets of twisted material, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2008.02812 (2020)

    2008 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ochoa and A

    H. Ochoa and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Flat bands and chiral optical response of moire insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 037402 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Ding and M

    C. Ding and M. Zhao, Chiral response in two- dimensional bilayers with time-reversal symmetry: A universal criterion, Phys. Rev. B108, 125415 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Transport be- tween twisted graphene layers, Phys. Rev. B81, 245412 (2010)

    2010

  28. [36]

    J. Zhu, D. Zhai, C. Xiao, and W. Yao, Layer Hall coun- terflow as a model probe of magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B109, 155114 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Franta, Symmetry of linear dielectric response ten- sors: dispersion models fulfilling three fundamental con- ditions, J

    D. Franta, Symmetry of linear dielectric response ten- sors: dispersion models fulfilling three fundamental con- ditions, J. Appl. Phys.127, 223101 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Pozo Ocana and I

    O. Pozo Ocana and I. Souza, Multipole theory of opti- cal spatial dispersion in crystals, SciPost Phys.14, 118 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Avdoshkin and F

    A. Avdoshkin and F. K. Popov, Extrinsic geometry of quantum states, Phys. Rev. B107, 245136 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Y. Q. Wang, T. Morimoto, and J. E. Moore, Opti- cal rotation in thin chiral/twisted materials and the gyrotropic magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. B101, 174419 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    P. T. Mahon and J. E. Sipe, From magnetoelectric re- sponse to optical activity, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043110 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    L. Zou, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and T. Senthil, Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: Emergent sym- metries, commensurate approximants, and Wannier ob- structions, Phys. Rev. B98, 085435 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Yu, Strongly Correlated Quantum States in WTe2, Ph.D

    G. Yu, Strongly Correlated Quantum States in WTe2, Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Kawakami, H

    T. Kawakami, H. Tateish, D. Yoshida, X. Yang, N. Nakatsuji, L. Chen, K. Aso, Y. Yamada-Takamura, Y. Oshima, Y. Zhang, et al., One-Dimensional Elec- tronic States in a Moire Superlattice of Twisted Bilayer WTe2, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2601.21228 (2026)

    2026 doi

  37. [45]

    J. Liu, X. Zhang, and G. Lu, Moire magnetism and moire excitons in twisted CrSBr bilayers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2413326121 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Q. Li, A. Shubnic, N. Agarwal, A. Alfrey, W. Liu, Z. Zhai, I. Lobanov, V. Uzdin, S. Li, Y. Yang, et al., Magneto-Moire Excitons in Twisted Bilayer CrSBr, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2512.20507 (2025)

    2025 doi

  39. [47]

    D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, M. Claassen, and A. Rubio, One-dimensional flat bands in twisted bilayer germa- nium selenide, Nat. Commun.11, 1124 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    S. Zhao, E. Wang, E. A. Uzer, S. Guo, R. Qi, J. Tan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Nilges, P. Gao, et al., Anisotropic moire optical transitions in twisted mono- layer/bilayer phosphorene heterostructures, Nat. Com- mun.12, 3947 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Soltero, J

    I. Soltero, J. Guerrero-Sanchez, F. Mireles, and D. A. Ruiz-Tijerina, Moire band structures of twisted phos- phorene bilayers, Phys. Rev. B105, 235421 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Jiang, L

    H. Jiang, L. An, X. Chen, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, J. Fu, X. Dai, Y. Yang, R. He, X. Wei, et al., Twist-stacked black phosphorus for wide-spectral chiral photodetec- tion, Nat. Commun.17, 1824 (2026)

    2026

  43. [51]

    S. Y. Wang, D. K. Li, M. J. Zha, X. Q. Yan, Z. Liu, and J. Tian, Tunable optical activity in twisted anisotropic two-dimensional materials, ACS Nano17, 16230 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    H. B. G. Casimir, On Onsager’s principle of microscopic reversibility, Rev. Mod. Phys.17, 343 (1945)

    1945

  45. [53]

    Rogacheva, V

    A. Rogacheva, V. Fedotov, A. Schwanecke, and N. Zhe- ludev, Giant gyrotropy due to electromagnetic-field cou- pling in a bilayered chiral structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 177401 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    E. Plum, V. Fedotov, A. Schwanecke, N. Zheludev, and Y. Chen, Giant optical gyrotropy due to electromagnetic coupling, Appl. Phys. Lett.90, 223113 (2007)

    2007

  47. [55]

    J. Xiao, A. Inbar, J. Birkbeck, N. Gershon, Y. Zamir, Y. Vituri, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, and S. Ilani, Imaging the flat bands of magic-angle graphene reshaped by interactions, Nature653, 68 (2026)

    2026

  48. [56]

    Inbar, J

    A. Inbar, J. Birkbeck, J. Xiao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, B. Yan, Y. Oreg, A. Stern, E. Berg, and S. Ilani, The quantum twisting microscope, Nature614, 682 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    N. Wei, F. von Oppen, and L. I. Glazman, Dirac-point spectroscopy of flat-band systems with the quantum twisting microscope, Phys. Rev. B111, 085128 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Birkbeck, J

    J. Birkbeck, J. Xiao, A. Inbar, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, E. Berg, L. Glazman, F. Guinea, F. von Oppen, and S. Ilani, Quantum twisting microscopy of phonons in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature641, 345 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    M. Lee, I. Das, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, J. Papp, J. Li, M. Daschner, Z. Zhou, M. Bhatt, M. Currle, J. Yu, et al., Revealing Electron–Electron Interactions in Graphene at Room Temperature with a Quantum Twisting Microscope, Nano Lett.26, 4046 (2026)

    2026

  52. [60]

    N. N. Nam and M. Koshino, Lattice relaxation and energy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphenes, Phys. Rev. B96, 075311 (2017)

    2017

  53. [61]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer, 2000)

    2000

  54. [62]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, and A. H. MacDonald, Hubbard model physics in transition metal dichalco- genide moire bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026402 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Y. Jia, J. Yu, J. Liu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Qi, H. Pi, N. Regnault, H. Weng, B. A. Bernevig, and Q. Wu, Moire fractional Chern insulators. I. First-principles calculations and continuum models of twisted bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. B109, 205121 (2024)

    2024

  56. [64]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. Mac- Donald, Topological insulators in twisted transition metal dichalcogenide homobilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 086402 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Phys.10, 343 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    W. Li, E. Redekop, C. Wang Beach, C. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, E. Anderson, H. Park, et al., Universal magnetic phases in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Nano Lett.25, 18044 (2025). 10

    2025

  59. [67]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Integer and fractional Chern insulators in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Evidence of the fractional quantum spin Hall effect in moire MoTe2, Nature628, 522 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    M. Wu, L. Li, Y. Ouyang, Y. Jiang, W. Qiu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huo, Q. Yang, M. Tian, N. Wan, et al., Observation of a Reconstructed Chern Insulator in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2603.16374 (2026)

    2026 doi

  62. [70]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al., Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature622, 63 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, et al., Obser- vation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature622, 74 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    Z. B. Dai, Y. He, and Z. Li, Effects of heterostrain and lattice relaxation on the optical conductivity of twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B104, 045403 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Z. Bi, N. F. Yuan, and L. Fu, Designing flat bands by strain, Phys. Rev. B100, 035448 (2019)

    2019

  66. [74]

    Escudero, A

    F. Escudero, A. Sinner, Z. Zhan, P. A. Pantaleon, and F. Guinea, Designing moire patterns by strain, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023203 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    Mortazavi, G

    B. Mortazavi, G. R. Berdiyorov, M. Makaremi, and T. Rabczuk, Mechanical responses of two-dimensional MoTe2; pristine 2H, 1T and 1T’ and 1T’/2H het- erostructure, Extreme Mech. Lett.20, 65 (2018)

    2018

  68. [76]

    S. Woo, H. C. Park, and Y. W. Son, Poisson’s ratio in layered two-dimensional crystals, Phys. Rev. B93, 075420 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    Thompson, K

    E. Thompson, K. T. Chu, F. Mesple, X.-W. Zhang, C. Hu, Y. Zhao, H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, K. Watanabe, et al., Microscopic signatures of topology in twisted MoTe2, Nat. Phys.21, 1224 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    Z. Ji, Y. Zhao, Y. Chen, Z. Zhu, Y. Wang, W. Liu, G. Modi, E. J. Mele, S. Jin, and R. Agarwal, Opto- twistronic Hall effect in a three-dimensional spiral lat- tice, Nature634, 69 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    G. Song, H. Hao, S. Yan, S. Fang, W. Xu, L. Tong, and J. Zhang, Observation of chirality transfer in twisted few-layer graphene, ACS Nano18, 17578 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    J. O. de Almeida, W. J. Kort-Kamp, and M. S. Scheurer, High-harmonic generation in systems with chiral Bloch states: application to rhombohedral graphene, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2604.11984 (2026)

    2026 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    Khaliji, L

    K. Khaliji, L. Martin-Moreno, P. Avouris, S.-H. Oh, and T. Low, Twisted two-dimensional material stacks for polarization optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 193902 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    H. T. Tung, Y. K. Chen, P. L. Jheng, and Y. C. Hung, Origin and manipulation of band gaps in three- dimensional dielectric helix structures, Opt. Express25, 17627 (2017)

    2017

  76. [84]

    F. Wu, R. X. Zhang, and S. Das Sarma, Three- dimensional topological twistronics, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 022010 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Wang and H

    C. Wang and H. Huang, Decomposing electronic struc- tures in twisted multilayers: Bridging spectra and incommensurate wave functions, Phys. Rev. B111, 195161 (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    V. T. Phong, K. Kunkelmann, C. De Beule, M. M. Al Ezzi, R. J. Slager, S. Adam, and E. Mele, Squeezing quantum states in three-dimensional twisted crystals, Phys. Rev. B111, 245156 (2025)

    2025

  79. [87]

    J. Park, T. Kim, E. Hwang, and H. Min, Magnetoplasmons in N-layer structures, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2602.12722 (2026)

    2026 doi

  80. [88]

    P. O. Kazinski and P. S. Korolev, Scattering of plane- wave and twisted photons by helical media, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 395301 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    T. Tani, T. Kawakami, and M. Koshino, Perpendicu- lar electronic transport and moire-induced resonance in twisted interfaces of three-dimensional graphite, Phys. Rev. B108, 165422 (2023)

    2023

  82. [90]

    Crosse and P

    J. Crosse and P. Moon, Faraday rotations, ellipticity, and circular dichroism in magneto-optical spectrum of moire superlattices, Chin. Phys. B30, 077803 (2021)

    2021

  83. [91]

    B. F. Mead, S. Talkington, A. H. Chen, D. Mallick, Z. Chu, X. Han, S. J. Yang, C. J. Kim, M. Brahlek, E. J. Mele, and L. Wu, Terahertz Landau level spec- troscopy of Dirac fermions in millimeter-scale twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B112, 205116 (2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    H. K. Kelardeh, V. Apalkov, and M. I. Stockman, Wannier-Stark states of graphene in strong electric field, Phys. Rev. B90, 085313 (2014)

    2014

  85. [93]

    Iafrate and V

    G. Iafrate and V. Sokolov, The Bloch Electron Response to Electric Fields: Application to Graphene, Phys. Sta- tus Solidi B257, 1900660 (2020)

    2020

  86. [94]

    De Beule, S

    C. De Beule, S. Gassner, S. Talkington, and E. J. Mele, Floquet-Bloch theory for nonperturbative response to a static drive, Phys. Rev. B109, 235421 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    S. Joy, S. Khalid, and B. Skinner, Transparent mirror effect in twist-angle-disordered bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043416 (2020)

    2020

  88. [96]

    Talkington, D

    S. Talkington, D. Mallick, A. H. Chen, B. F. Mead, S. J. Yang, C. J. Kim, S. Adam, L. Wu, M. Brahlek, and E. J. Mele, Weak localization and universal conductance fluc- tuations in large-area twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B113, 165430 (2026)

    2026

  89. [97]

    Ollier, M

    A. Ollier, M. Kisiel, X. Lu, U. Gysin, M. Poggio, D. K. Efetov, and E. Meyer, Energy dissipation on magic angle twisted bilayer graphene, Commun. Phys.6, 344 (2023)

    2023

  90. [98]

    Talkington and M

    S. Talkington and M. Claassen, Linear and non- linear response of quadratic Lindbladians, npj Quantum Mater.9, 104 (2024)

    2024

  91. [99]

    J. P. Esparza and V. Juricic, Exceptional magic angles in non-Hermitian twisted bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 226602 (2025)

    2025

  92. [100]

    J. W. Rhim and B. J. Yang, Singular flat bands, Adv. Phys. X6, 1901606 (2021)

    2021

  93. [101]

    Talkington and M

    S. Talkington and M. Claassen, Dissipation-induced flat bands, Phys. Rev. B106, L161109 (2022)

    2022

  94. [102]

    Regnault, Y

    N. Regnault, Y. Xu, M. R. Li, D. S. Ma, M. Jovanovic, A. Yazdani, S. S. P. Parkin, C. Felser, L. M. Schoop, N. P. Ong, et al., Catalogue of flat-band stoichiometric materials, Nature603, 824 (2022). 11

    2022

  95. [103]

    Margetis, G

    D. Margetis, G. Gomez-Santos, and T. Stauber, Optical response of alternating twisted trilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B110, 205144 (2024)

    2024

  96. [104]

    C. Xiao, C. Xiao, D. Zhai, and W. Yao, Interlayer elec- tric multipole Hall effect in twisted multilayers, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2606.28205 (2026)

    2026 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    Yokoshi and A

    N. Yokoshi and A. Kato, Optical vortex probe of loop- current chirality in moire materials, Phys. Rev. B113, 245303 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.