Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 88 references

This paper reports the first long-duration very-high-energy gamma-ray flare from BL Lacertae and shows that its broadband spectrum requires an external-Compton component beyond the classic one-zone synchrotron self-Compton model.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 23:21 UTC pith:JY653YRT

load-bearing objection Solid new detection of an ~11-day VHE elevated epoch from BL Lacertae, but the '~40-day flare' and the 6.9σ SSC+EIC preference are both overstated; worth refereeing after the claims are tempered. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15435 v1 pith:JY653YRT submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.HE

A Multiwavelength Study of a Long-Duration VHE Flare from BL Lacertae with VERITAS

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords BL Lacertaeblazarsvery-high-energy gamma rayssynchrotron self-Comptonexternal inverse Comptonlong-duration flaremulti-wavelength observations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper claims that BL Lacertae, the prototype intermediate blazar, stayed in an elevated very-high-energy (VHE) gamma-ray state for roughly 40 days after a short GeV flare in October 2022 — the longest sustained VHE flare ever observed from this source. Previous VHE flares from BL Lacertae lasted from minutes to about a day, so this duration is a new phenomenon. The paper further argues that the broadband spectrum during this long elevated epoch cannot be explained by the standard one-zone synchrotron self-Compton model alone; adding an external inverse-Compton component improves the fit at 6.9σ significance. If correct, this means that week-long VHE states can occur in intermediate blazars and that external photon fields can matter even for sources usually modeled with pure SSC.

Core claim

The central discovery is the identification of a long-duration elevated VHE activity epoch from BL Lacertae, defined as the stretch of continuous nightly detections from November 17 to November 28, 2022, about 40 days after the GeV flare detected by Fermi-LAT on October 15–17, 2022. Earlier VHE flares from this source lasted minutes to a day, so this sustained state is the first of its kind for BL Lacertae. During this epoch, VERITAS detected the source at 28σ significance overall, with a time-averaged VHE flux about 10% of the Crab Nebula flux and a curved log-parabola spectrum. Broadband spectral modeling of the elevated epoch shows that a one-zone SSC model fits the data with χ²/ndf = 96.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two pieces: the definition of the 'elevated VHE activity epoch' and the comparison of nested radiative models fit to the broadband spectral energy distribution. The epoch is defined post hoc as continuous nightly detections with no more than three nights between detections, which converts sparse nightly snapshots into a single ~40-day flare. The model comparison uses a one-zone SSC model with a broken power-law electron distribution and an SSC+EIC model that adds an external inverse-Compton component from thermal disk radiation reprocessed by the broad-line region. A log-likelihood ratio test between these nested models yields the 6.9σ preference for SSC+EIC.

Load-bearing premise

The duration claim assumes the source stayed in an elevated VHE state through the Oct 31–Nov 16 gap caused by moon and weather; if it did not, the evidence reduces to two separate flaring episodes rather than one ~40-day flare.

What would settle it

A dedicated daily VHE monitoring campaign over a moon-free window after a GeV flare from an intermediate blazar, or archival data showing the source was quiescent between October 31 and November 16, 2022, would settle whether the elevated state was truly continuous. Re-running the SED fit with the OVRO and VLBA radio points treated as detections rather than upper limits would also directly test the robustness of the 6.9σ model preference.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central claim holds, BL Lacertae shows that intermediate blazars can remain in an elevated VHE state for weeks, not just minutes to days, so rapid-flare models are incomplete.
  • The 6.9σ preference for SSC+EIC implies that external photon fields contribute to VHE emission during long-duration states, at least in this source.
  • The lack of simultaneous GeV and X-ray counterparts to the Oct 29–30 VHE flare and the Nov 17–28 elevated epoch suggests that the long VHE state does not simply track the GeV flare, pointing to multiple emission zones or particle populations.
  • The near-perfect GeV–optical correlation during the short GeV flare epoch supports co-spatial production for that flare, but the same model cannot explain the long-duration epoch, so at least two different emission regimes are needed.
  • Radio observations show no elevated activity during the VHE flare, so the long-duration VHE state is not accompanied by a new radio outburst.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: If the elevated VHE state truly persisted across the Oct 31–Nov 16 moonlight gap, the energy budget implies continuous or repeated particle acceleration rather than a single cooling blob; a single zone at the fitted parameters would cool much faster than 40 days.
  • Editorial extension: A testable extension is to monitor other intermediate blazars daily with moon-avoiding schedules after GeV triggers; catching quiescent nights inside an assumed epoch would distinguish a single plateau from a train of sub-flares.
  • Editorial extension: The modeling choice to treat radio points as upper limits is worth probing; re-running the fit with radio fluxes as detections could strengthen or weaken the 6.9σ preference.
  • Editorial extension: If external Compton from the broad-line region is required in an intermediate blazar, the clean division between low-frequency and high-frequency blazars' emission mechanisms is less sharp than often assumed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports VERITAS observations of BL Lacertae (VER J2202+422) triggered by a Fermi-LAT GeV flare on 2022 October 15, together with Swift-XRT/UVOT, NuSTAR, optical (FLWO, ATLAS), and radio (OVRO, VLBA) data. The authors claim the first long-duration VHE flare from BL Lacertae, lasting roughly 40 days, and report a ~28 sigma detection over the September–December 2022 epoch. They define an 'elevated VHE activity epoch' from November 17 to 28 and note separate VHE detections on October 29–30. Broadband SED modeling with Bjet MCMC compares a one-zone SSC model and an SSC+EIC model, finding that the SSC+EIC model is preferred at 6.9 sigma. The paper interprets this as evidence that an external-Compton component is needed during the long-duration VHE state.

Significance. If the headline claims hold, this is a valuable result: it would extend the observed VHE flaring timescale for BL Lacertae from minutes/days to a sustained multi-day elevated state and would challenge a simple one-zone SSC interpretation. The observational work has clear strengths: the VERITAS analysis uses two independent analysis packages, the 28 sigma significance is based on the standard Li & Ma prescription, the multiwavelength dataset is unusually broad, and the SED fitting uses a public, previously validated code with conservative uncertainty assignment. Nevertheless, the '~40 day' duration claim is not directly supported by the lightcurve, and the statistical basis of the 6.9 sigma model preference needs more careful treatment. The paper's central novelty and its physical conclusion therefore both require revision before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1.2, Fig. 2, abstract, §4] The '~40 day' long-duration VHE flare is not established by the data. The elevated VHE epoch is defined as continuous nightly detections with <=3 nights between detections, from November 17 to 28, and the October 29–30 detections are explicitly excluded because of the October 31–November 16 gap. The text itself says 'we are unable to determine the source's activity from 2022 October 31 to 2022 November 17.' Thus the lightcurve demonstrates a 2-day GeV flare, a 2-day VHE flare in late October, and an 11-day elevated VHE epoch in November; it does not demonstrate flaring 'for over a month.' The abstract's 'continued to detect flaring activity ... for over a month' and §4's 'lasting until at least ~40 days after' conflate a time interval between the GeV trigger and the last VHE detection with an observed continuous flaring duration. This is the central claim of the paper, so it must be refr
  2. [§3.2, Table 1, Fig. 3] The 6.9 sigma preference for SSC+EIC over one-zone SSC is load-bearing for the physical conclusion, but the statistical comparison is not presented with enough rigor. The paper reports chi^2/ndf = 96.96/56 for SSC and 38.80/52 for SSC+EIC, a chi^2 difference of ~58 for 4 additional parameters, and invokes a log-likelihood ratio test with Wilks 1938. However, Wilks' theorem requires nested models with regularity conditions; the EIC model includes parameters with priors, inequality constraints, and a nucleus-luminosity upper limit, and the 'preference' is based on a single SED. Moreover, the SED combines non-simultaneous observations (as the paper acknowledges) and treats radio points as upper limits, so the quoted significance should be validated with simulated data or a likelihood that accounts for these features. The authors should state the precise statistic used (Δchi^2, ΔlogL, or som
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction, §2.1] Typographical and formatting issues: 'Chenrenkov' should be 'Cherenkov'; 'T able' in the Table 1 caption; author lists contain stray spaces ('F alcone', 'V alverde'); 'Fermi' should be consistently italicized (e.g., 'Fermi-LAT').
  2. [§3.1.2] The definition of 'elevated VHE activity' as a nightly detection (30 min–2 hr exposure) is reasonable but should be stated quantitatively with a threshold significance. The choice of '<=3 nights between detections' is not justified; please provide the expected cadence or show how varying this threshold affects the epoch boundaries.
  3. [§3.2] The SED points are described as being built from the elevated VHE epoch with conservative uncertainties, but the paper does not include a table of the SED data or per-instrument fit residuals. Adding such a table would help readers assess whether the model preference is driven by a few points or is distributed across the SED.
  4. [Appendix, Fig. 4] The LCCF analysis in §3.1.1 is reported as showing 'very strong correlation' but the figure is in the appendix; please add the peak correlation coefficient and its uncertainty in the text. Also, Figures 5 and 6 (corner plots) are not mentioned in the body; consider referring to them where the fits are discussed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No formal circularity: this is an observational campaign plus SED model fitting, not a derivation. The 'long-duration' epoch label is definition-dependent and gap-sensitive, but that is a measurement caveat, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper contains no first-principles derivation whose output is equivalent to its input. The two central claims are observational and statistical: (1) VERITAS detected elevated VHE activity over an extended span, and (2) an SSC+EIC model fits the broadband SED better than one-zone SSC, with a 6.9σ log-likelihood preference. Neither is disguised as a prediction. The model parameters are freely fitted to the same SED, and the comparison is explicitly a nested-model likelihood-ratio test (Wilks 1938), not an out-of-sample prediction, so no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The 'elevated VHE activity epoch' is defined in §3.1.2 as continuous nightly detections with ≤3 nights between detections (Nov 17–28), and the abstract converts the interval from the GeV trigger to the last VHE detection into '~40 days' of flaring activity. This is definition-dependent and sparse-sampling-dependent: the paper itself states 'we are unable to determine the source's activity from 2022 October 31 to 2022 November 17.' That is a legitimate caveat on the headline duration claim, but it is not a circular derivation—the detections are real, independent data, and the duration label is an interpretation of them. Self-citations to Bjet MCMC (Hervet et al. 2024) and the SED host-galaxy correction code (Hervet 2024) are tool usage and model assumptions, not load-bearing external validations. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-by-citation, or renaming of a known result drives the central claim. Score 1 reflects only the minor definition-dependence of the 'long-duration' label, not substantive circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

13 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or physical entities; the SSC+EIC component is a standard model ingredient. The central claims rest on standard statistical tools and public modeling code, plus the post-hoc epoch definition and 13 fitted SED parameters in the preferred model.

free parameters (13)
  • Doppler factor δ = 70.5 (SSC); 89.9 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted in Bjet MCMC SED fit; high values needed to sustain long-duration VHE emission (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Particle density normalization K = 8.7e3 cm^-3 (SSC); 1.6e4 cm^-3 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted SED normalization parameter in §3.2, Table 1.
  • Electron spectral index n1 (below γ_break) = 2.16 (SSC); 2.33 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted low-energy electron index in the broken power law EED (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Electron spectral index n2 (above γ_break) = 4.37 (SSC); 4.39 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted high-energy electron index in the broken power law EED (§3.2, Table 1).
  • γ_min = 4.2 (SSC); 1.7 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted minimum Lorentz factor of the electron distribution (§3.2, Table 1).
  • γ_max = 1.3e6 (SSC); 3.7e7 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted maximum Lorentz factor of the electron distribution (§3.2, Table 1).
  • γ_break = 1.8e4 (SSC); 8.0e3 (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted break Lorentz factor; the sharp break is interpreted as phenomenological rather than radiative cooling (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Magnetic field B = 8.4e-3 G (SSC); 1.7e-2 G (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted magnetic field strength in the emission blob (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Blob radius R = 3.7e16 cm (SSC); 3.1e16 cm (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted radius of the emitting region (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Black-body temperature of disk (bbtemp) = 5.9e4 K (SSC+EIC)
    Additional free parameter in the SSC+EIC model (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Nucleus luminosity L_nuc = 1.6e44 erg/s (SSC+EIC)
    Fitted within an upper limit derived from the 10-year minimum optical flux (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Scattered fraction τ = 2.4e-4 (SSC+EIC)
    Additional free parameter controlling the EIC seed photon field (§3.2, Table 1).
  • Distance of blob from SMBH D_BH = 4.5e17 cm (SSC+EIC)
    Additional free parameter in the SSC+EIC model (§3.2, Table 1).
axioms (6)
  • standard math Li & Ma (1983) significance formula correctly estimates detection significance for ON/OFF counts.
    Used to claim the 28σ detection (§2.1).
  • standard math Wilks theorem applies to the log-likelihood ratio between the nested one-zone SSC and SSC+EIC models, yielding a 6.9σ preference.
    Used in §3.2; assumptions (regularity, no boundary effects, correct likelihood) are not checked for MCMC fits with bounded parameters.
  • domain assumption Redshift z=0.069 and luminosity distance DL=312.9 Mpc (H0=69.6) for BL Lacertae.
    Used for EBL correction and nucleus luminosity constraint (§3.2).
  • domain assumption The Bjet MCMC code implements the SSC and EIC radiation models correctly.
    SED modeling relies on public code from Hervet et al. (2024) and prior applications; no independent code verification in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Radio SED points (OVRO 15 GHz, VLBA 43 GHz) are contaminated by extended jet emission and can be treated as upper limits.
    Modeling choice in §3.2; if incorrect, radio constraints change and the fit could shift.
  • ad hoc to paper The nucleus luminosity of BL Lac is bounded by the 10-year minimum optical flux; the EIC radiation field is thermal BLR reprocessing.
    Used to set the upper limit on L_nuc in §3.2; depends on source history and assumes a BLR-like external radiation field for a weak-lined BL Lac.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19715 in / 14666 out tokens · 126707 ms · 2026-08-01T23:21:54.079622+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We report the first observations of a long-duration very-high-energy (VHE; $E > 100$ GeV) flare from BL Lacertae (VER J2202+422), taken with the Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS). On October 15, 2022, the Fermi-Large Area Telescope (LAT) detected elevated GeV activity originating from this blazar. This triggered a multiwavelength campaign, which includes observations from VERITAS, Swift, NuSTAR, and select optical and radio observatories. VERITAS observed the source for a total of $\sim 9.8$ hours between September 1, 2022 and December 1, 2022. An analysis of these data yields a $\sim 28 \sigma$ detection of the source. While previously observed VHE flares from BL Lacertae have lasted on time-scales of minutes to days, VERITAS continued to detect flaring activity from the source for over a month ($\sim 40$ days) after the original flaring activity was detected with Fermi-LAT. Broadband spectral modeling shows that a synchrotron self-Compton (SSC) model with an external inverse-Compton (EC) component is preferred over a one-zone SSC model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15435 by Abe Falcone, Alberto Sadun, Alisha Chromey, Allen Marscher, Amy Furniss, Anjana Talluri, Anne Duerr, Anthony Readhead, Ashwani Pandey, Atreya Acharyya, Avery Archer, Claire Hinrichs, Connor Mooney, David Williams, Deivid Ribeiro, Donggeun Tak, Eileen Meyer, Elisa Pueschel, Emmet Thomas Roache, Glenn Sembroski, Iftach Sadeh, James Buckley, James Tucci, Jamie Holder, Janeth Valverde, Jodi Christiansen, John Millis, John Quinn, Joshua Bartkoske, Juan Escudero Pedrosa, Katie Riley, Kenneth J. Ragan, Lab Saha, Leandro Rizk, Lucy Fortson, Madalyn Johnson, Manel Errando, Margo Aller, Maria Kherlakian, Mark Lang, Martin Pohl, Mary P. Kertzman, Masoud Asadi-Zeydabadi, Matthew Lundy, Megan Splettstoesser, Miguel Escobar Godoy, Nikolas Korzoun, Olivier Hervet, Patrick Moriarty, Paul Reynolds, Pazit Rabinowitz, Philipe De La Parra, Philip Kaaret, Piatra Lusen, Priyadarshini Bangale, Qi Feng, Rene A. Ong, Reshmi Mukherjee, Ruo Shang, Ryan Hickox, Sam Wong (VERITAS Collaboration), Sanchari Kundu, Sebastian Kiehlmann, Simon Filbert, Svetlana Jorstad, Sydney Feldman, Thomas Humensky, Tobias Kleiner, Walter Max-Moerbeck, Weidong Jin, Wenmeng Ning, William Hanlon, Wystan Benbow, Yu Chen, Zach Hughes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Skymap of the significance observed by VERITAS during the epoch of interest (September 1, 2022 UTC - December 1, 2022 UTC; 59823 - 59914 MJD inclusive) from the direction of BL Lacertae. The extent of the VHE source is consistent with the VERITAS point-spread function (PSF). The PSF in this analysis is reduced from prior publications due to the use of the Image Template Method γ-ray reconstruction (C… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Multiwavelength observations of BL Lacertae between MJD 59823 and MJD 59914 (September 1, 2022 - December 1, 2022). The pink and purple narrow bands correspond to the GeV flare epoch and the elevated VHE activity epoch respectively. Vertical dashed grey line indicates October 29, 2022, associated with short-term elevated VHE activity. Vertical dashed green line indicated November 12, 2022, associated with … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Broadband SED for BL Lacertae during the VERITAS elevated VHE activity epoch. The radio SED points from OVRO and VLBA are treated as upper limits for modeling purposes due to a larger integration region, potentially contaminated by extended jet emission. This SED is fit to a single-zone SSC model. Right: The same SED is fit to an SSC model with an additional external inverse-Compton component. 3.2. S… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Local cross-correlation function (LCCF, Welsh 1999) calculated between the observed GeV emission and ATLAS measurements during the GeV flare epoch. The x-axis represents the time delay, ∆tAT LAS,F ermi = tAT LAS − tF ermi, in days between the Fermi-LAT and ATLAS lightcurves (Acharyya & Sadun 2023). The corresponding shaded regions indicate the error bounds of the LCCFs. There is very strong correlation bet… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The corner plot of the posterior probability distribution of the free parameters from the one-zone SSC SED fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The corner plot of the posterior probability distribution of the free parameters from the SSC+EIC SED fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope Mission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071 , archivePrefix =. 0902.1089 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) , year = 2017, series =

    Fermipy: An open-source Python package for analysis of Fermi-LAT Data. 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) , year = 2017, series =

  3. [3]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Pass 8: Toward the Full Realization of the Fermi-LAT Scientific Potential. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Incremental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751 , archivePrefix =. 2201.11184 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf , archivePrefix =. 1802.00879 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Design and Operation of the ATLAS Transient Science Server. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab936e , archivePrefix =. 2003.09052 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    A First Catalog of Variable Stars Measured by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aae47f , archivePrefix =. 1804.02132 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    Physica Scripta , abstract =

    Roger D Blandford and Martin J Rees , title =. Physica Scripta , abstract =. 1978 , month =. doi:10.1088/0031-8949/17/3/020 , url =

  9. [9]

    Fossati and L

    G. Fossati and L. Maraschi and A. Celotti and A. Comastri and G. Ghisellini , title =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01828.x , url =

  10. [10]

    Nieppola and M

    E. Nieppola and M. Tornikoski and E. Valtaoja , title =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053316 , url =

  11. [11]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Fermi-LAT detection of renewed gamma-ray activity from BL Lacertae. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  12. [12]

    Pandey and C

    A. Pandey and C. S. Stalin , title =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244648 , url =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    The spectrum and magnitude of the galaxy associated with BL Lacertae. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/182612 , adsurl =

  14. [14]

    Johnson and Adrian Youngquist , title =

    Olivier Hervet and Caitlin A. Johnson and Adrian Youngquist , title =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09c0 , url =

  15. [15]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Jiménez-Fernández, Bruno and van Eerten, Hendrik Jan , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3163 , url =

  16. [16]

    Tramacere and E

    A. Tramacere and E. Massaro and A. M. Taylor , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/66 , url =

  17. [17]

    Galaxies , keywords =

    Investigating Possible Correlations between Gamma-Ray and Optical Lightcurves for TeV-Detected Northern Blazars over 8 Years of Observations. Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies11040081 , archivePrefix =. 2307.00333 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    Janeth Valverde and Deirdre Horan and Denis Bernard and Stephen Fegan and (Fermi-LAT Collaboration) and A. U. Abeysekara and A. Archer and W. Benbow and R. Bird and A. Brill and R. Brose and M. Buchovecky and J. H. Buckley and J. L. Christiansen and W. Cui and A. Falcone and Q. Feng and J. P. Finley and L. Fortson and A. Furniss and A. Gent and G. H. Gill...

  19. [19]

    C. B. Adams and J. Batshoun and W. Benbow and A. Brill and J. H. Buckley and M. Capasso and B. Cavins and J. L. Christiansen and P. Coppi and M. Errando and K. A Farrell and Q. Feng and J. P. Finley and G. M. Foote and L. Fortson and A. Furniss and A. Gent and C. Giuri and D. Hanna and T. Hassan and O. Hervet and J. Holder and M. Houck and T. B. Humensky ...

  20. [20]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201425330

    Linking radio and gamma-ray emission in Ap Librae , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201425330", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425330", journal =

  21. [21]

    Arlen and T

    T. Arlen and T. Aune and M. Beilicke and W. Benbow and A. Bouvier and J. H. Buckley and V. Bugaev and A. Cesarini and L. Ciupik and M. P. Connolly and W. Cui and R. Dickherber and J. Dumm and M. Errando and A. Falcone and S. Federici and Q. Feng and J. P. Finley and G. Finnegan and L. Fortson and A. Furniss and N. Galante and D. Gall and S. Griffin and J....

  22. [22]

    V. A. Acciari and S. Ansoldi and L. A. Antonelli and A. Arbet Engels and D. Baack and A. Babi. A fast, very-high-energy i /i -ray flare from. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834010 , url =

  23. [23]

    A. U. Abeysekara and W. Benbow and R. Bird and T. Brantseg and R. Brose and M. Buchovecky and J. H. Buckley and V. Bugaev and M. P. Connolly and W. Cui and M. K. Daniel and A. Falcone and Q. Feng and J. P. Finley and L. Fortson and A. Furniss and G. H. Gillanders and I. Gunawardhana and M. Hütten and D. Hanna and O. Hervet and J. Holder and G. Hughes and ...

  24. [24]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    X-ray flaring activity in BL Lac. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  25. [25]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Optical brightening of BL Lacertae. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  26. [26]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    An exceptionally optical flare of BL Lac on 2022 Oct. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  27. [27]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Medicina 32m radio telescope observations of BL Lacertae. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  28. [28]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Variability of BL Lac in the RATAN-600 radio telescope measurements. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  29. [29]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Fermi-LAT gamma-ray flare in BL Lacertae contemporaneous with optical flaring activity. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  30. [30]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Fermi-LAT detection of enhanced gamma-ray activity from BL Lac. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  31. [31]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Fermi-LAT detection of continued enhanced gamma-ray activity from BL Lac. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  32. [32]

    International Cosmic Ray Conference , year = 2011, series =

    VERITAS: Status and Highlights. International Cosmic Ray Conference , year = 2011, series =. doi:10.7529/ICRC2011/V12/H11 , archivePrefix =. 1111.1225 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    The Swift X-Ray Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508071 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    Gamma-Ray Bursts: 30 Years of Discovery , year = 2004, series =

    The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission. Gamma-Ray Bursts: 30 Years of Discovery , year = 2004, series =. doi:10.1063/1.1810924 , adsurl =. astro-ph/0405233 , editor =

  35. [35]

    and Atkins, R.W

    Holder, J. and Atkins, R.W. and Badran, H.M. and Blaylock, G. and Bradbury, S.M. and Buckley, J.H. and Byrum, K.L. and Carter-Lewis, D.A. and Celik, O. and Chow, Y.C.K. and Cogan, P. and Cui, W. and Daniel, M.K. and de la Calle Perez, I. and Dowdall, C. and Dowkontt, P. and Duke, C. and Falcone, A.D. and Fegan, S.J. and Finley, J.P. and Fortin, P. and For...

  36. [36]

    2017 , eprint=

    Characterization of a Maximum Likelihood Gamma-Ray Reconstruction Algorithm for VERITAS , author=. 2017 , eprint=

  37. [37]

    Jorstad and Alan P

    Svetlana G. Jorstad and Alan P. Marscher and Matthew L. Lister and Alastair M. Stirling and Timothy V. Cawthorne and Walter K. Gear and José L. Gómez and Jason A. Stevens and Paul S. Smith and James R. Forster and E. Ian Robson , title =. The Astronomical Journal , abstract =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1086/444593 , url =

  38. [38]

    and Hill, J

    Burrows, David N. and Hill, J. E. and Nousek, J. A. and Kennea, J. A. and Wells, A. and Osborne, J. P. and Abbey, A. F. and Beardmore, A. and Mukerjee, K. and Short, A. D. T. and Chincarini, G. and Campana, S. and Citterio, O. and Moretti, A. and Pagani, C. and Tagliaferri, G. and Giommi, P. and Capalbi, M. and Tamburelli, F. and Angelini, L. and Cusumano...

  39. [39]

    and Reimer, A

    Böttcher, M. and Reimer, A. and Sweeney, K. and Prakash, A. , year=. LEPTONIC AND HADRONIC MODELING OFFERMI-DETECTED BLAZARS , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/54 , number=

  40. [40]

    Modeling the emission processes in blazars , volume=

    Böttcher, Markus , year=. Modeling the emission processes in blazars , volume=. Astrophysics and Space Science , publisher=. doi:10.1007/s10509-007-9404-0 , number=

  41. [41]

    and Massaro, F

    Paggi, A. and Massaro, F. and Vittorini, V. and Cavaliere, A. and D’Ammando, F. and Vagnetti, F. and Tavani, M. , year=. SSC radiation in BL Lacertae sources, the end of the tether , volume=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , publisher=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912237 , number=

  42. [42]

    Sikora, Marek and Stawarz, Lukasz and Moderski, Rafal and Nalewajko, Krzysztof and Madejski, Greg M. , year=. CONSTRAINING EMISSION MODELS OF LUMINOUS BLAZAR SOURCES , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/1/38 , number=

  43. [43]

    Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei , volume=

    Blandford, Roger and Meier, David and Readhead, Anthony , year=. Relativistic Jets from Active Galactic Nuclei , volume=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher=. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051948 , number=

  44. [44]

    34th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2015) , year = 2015, series =

    Performance of the VERITAS experiment. 34th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2015) , year = 2015, series =

  45. [45]

    Fomin and S

    V.P. Fomin and S. Fennell and R.C. Lamb and D.A. Lewis and M. Punch and T.C. Weekes , Doi =. New methods of atmospheric Cherenkov imaging for gamma-ray astronomy. II. The differential position method , Url =. Astroparticle Physics , Number =. 1994 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

  46. [46]

    , eprint =

    Background modelling in very-high-energy -ray astronomy. , eprint =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066674 , adsurl =

  47. [47]

    International Cosmic Ray Conference , year = 2008, series =

    VEGAS, the VERITAS Gamma-ray Analysis Suite. International Cosmic Ray Conference , year = 2008, series =

  48. [48]

    35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) , year = 2017, series =

    Eventdisplay: An Analysis and Reconstruction Package for Ground-based Gamma-ray Astronomy. 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) , year = 2017, series =

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Analysis methods for results in gamma-ray astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/161295 , adsurl =

  50. [50]

    and Aune, T

    Archambault, S. and Aune, T. and Behera, B. and Beilicke, M. and Benbow, W. and Berger, K. and Bird, R. and Biteau, J. and Bugaev, V. and Byrum, K. and Cardenzana, J. V and Cerruti, M. and Chen, X. and Ciupik, L. and Connolly, M. P. and Cui, W. and Dumm, J. and Errando, M. and Falcone, A. and Federici, S. and Feng, Q. and Finley, J. P. and Fleischhack, H....

  51. [52]

    Evans, P. A. and Beardmore, A. P. and Page, K. L. and Tyler, L. G. and Osborne, J. P. and Goad, M. R. and O’Brien, P. T. and Vetere, L. and Racusin, J. and Morris, D. and Burrows, D. N. and Capalbi, M. and Perri, M. and Gehrels, N. and Romano, P. , year=. An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves of -ray bursts , volume=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , p...

  52. [53]

    , keywords =

    The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0507413 , primaryClass =

  53. [54]

    and Starling, R

    Willingale, R. and Starling, R. L. C. and Beardmore, A. P. and Tanvir, N. R. and O’Brien, P. T. , year=. Calibration of X-ray absorption in our Galaxy , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt175 , number=

  54. [55]

    and Finkbeiner, Douglas P

    Schlafly, Edward F. and Finkbeiner, Douglas P. , year=. MEASURING REDDENING WITH SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STELLAR SPECTRA AND RECALIBRATING SFD , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 , number=

  55. [56]

    On Determining Extinction from Reddening , volume =

    McCall, Marshall , year =. On Determining Extinction from Reddening , volume =. The Astronomical Journal , doi =

  56. [57]

    Poole, T. S. and Breeveld, A. A. and Page, M. J. and Landsman, W. and Holland, S. T. and Roming, P. and Kuin, N. P. M. and Brown, P. J. and Gronwall, C. and Hunsberger, S. and Koch, S. and Mason, K. O. and Schady, P. and Berk, D. Vanden and Blustin, A. J. and Boyd, P. and Broos, P. and Carter, M. and Chester, M. M. and Cucchiara, A. and Hancock, B. and Hu...

  57. [58]

    and Craig, William W

    Harrison, Fiona A. and Craig, William W. and Christensen, Finn E. and Hailey, Charles J. and Zhang, William W. and Boggs, Steven E. and Stern, Daniel and Cook, W. Rick and Forster, Karl and Giommi, Paolo and Grefenstette, Brian W. and Kim, Yunjin and Kitaguchi, Takao and Koglin, Jason E. and Madsen, Kristin K. and Mao, Peter H. and Miyasaka, Hiromasa and ...

  58. [59]

    and Marscher, Alan P

    Jorstad, Svetlana G. and Marscher, Alan P. and Morozova, Daria A. and Troitsky, Ivan S. and Agudo, Iván and Casadio, Carolina and Foord, Adi and Gómez, José L. and MacDonald, Nicholas R. and Molina, Sol N. and Lähteenmäki, Anne and Tammi, Joni and Tornikoski, Merja , year=. Kinematics of Parsec-scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43 GHz within the VLBA-BU-...

  59. [60]

    and Jorstad, Svetlana G

    Weaver, Zachary R. and Jorstad, Svetlana G. and Marscher, Alan P. and Morozova, Daria A. and Troitsky, Ivan S. and Agudo, Iván and Gómez, José L. and Lähteenmäki, Anne and Tammi, Joni and Tornikoski, Merja , year=. Kinematics of Parsec-scale Jets of Gamma-Ray Blazars at 43 GHz during 10 yr of the VLBA-BU-BLAZAR Program , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal...

  60. [61]

    and Lobanov, Andrei P

    Gómez, José L. and Lobanov, Andrei P. and Bruni, Gabriele and Kovalev, Yuri Y. and Marscher, Alan P. and Jorstad, Svetlana G. and Mizuno, Yosuke and Bach, Uwe and Sokolovsky, Kirill V. and Anderson, James M. and Galindo, Pablo and Kardashev, Nikolay S. and Lisakov, Mikhail M. , year=. PROBING THE INNERMOST REGIONS OF AGN JETS AND THEIR MAGNETIC FIELDS WIT...

  61. [62]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Blazars in the Fermi Era: The OVRO 40 m Telescope Monitoring Program. , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/29 , adsurl =

  62. [63]

    , keywords =

    The absolute spectrum of Cas A: an accurate flux density scale and a set of secondary calibrators. , keywords =

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    A Limit on the Anisotropy of the Microwave Background Radiation on Arcminute Scales. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/168039 , adsurl =

  64. [65]

    M. S. Bessell , title =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , abstract =. 1979 , month =. doi:10.1086/130542 , url =

  65. [66]

    Studies in Astronomical Time Series Analysis. VI. Bayesian Block Representations. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/167 , archivePrefix =. 1207.5578 , primaryClass =

  66. [67]

    10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/201322068", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322068", journal =

  67. [68]

    2018 , month =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package* , journal =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , url =

  68. [69]

    and Adams, C

    Acharyya, A. and Adams, C. B. and Archer, A. and Bangale, P. and Benbow, W. and Brill, A. and Christiansen, J. L. and Chromey, A. J. and Errando, M. and Falcone, A. and Feng, Q. and Finley, J. P. and Foote, G. M. and Fortson, L. and Furniss, A. and Gallagher, G. and Hanlon, W. and Hanna, D. and Hervet, O. and Hinrichs, C. E. and Hoang, J. and Holder, J. a...

  69. [70]

    , keywords =

    Extragalactic background light inferred from AEGIS galaxy-SED-type fractions. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17631.x , archivePrefix =. 1007.1459 , primaryClass =

  70. [71]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14991745 , url =

    Olivier Hervet and deividribeiro and Aaron Danen , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14991745 , url =

  71. [72]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    PEGASE.2, a metallicity-consistent spectral evolution model of galaxies: the documentation and the code. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9912179 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9912179 , primaryClass =

  72. [73]

    Helene , abstract =

    O. Helene , abstract =. Upper limit of peak area , journal =. 1983 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5087(83)90709-3 , url =

  73. [74]

    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A , year = 1984, month = dec, volume =

    Errors in experiments with small numbers of events. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A , year = 1984, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1016/0168-9002(84)90020-2 , adsurl =

  74. [75]

    , keywords =

    Flaring activity from magnetic reconnection in BL Lacertae. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad023 , archivePrefix =. 2302.07904 , primaryClass =

  75. [76]

    The extragalactic background light revisited and the cosmic photon-photon opacity , volume=

    Franceschini, Alberto and Rodighiero, Giulia , year=. The extragalactic background light revisited and the cosmic photon-photon opacity , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629684 , journal=

  76. [77]

    Megan and Padovani, Paolo , year=

    Urry, C. Megan and Padovani, Paolo , year=. Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei , volume=. doi:10.1086/133630 , journal=

  77. [78]

    2024 , eprint=

    A multi-wavelength study to decipher the 2017 flare of the blazar OJ 287 , author=. 2024 , eprint=

  78. [79]

    , title =

    Henden A.A., Templeton M., Terrell D., Smith T.C., Levine S., Welch D. , title =

  79. [80]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: AAVSO Photometric All Sky Survey (APASS) DR9 (Henden+, 2016) , author=

  80. [81]

    S. S. Wilks , journal =. The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses , urldate =

Showing first 80 references.