Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 104 references

Abell 2244 hosts two diffuse radio components that share an integrated spectrum near 0.9 but behave differently at high frequency and in their radio-X-ray correlation, suggesting different physical origins.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 23:21 UTC pith:7LU5HFXE

load-bearing objection Careful multi-frequency follow-up of a known two-component halo in A2244; the outer component is probably real diffuse emission, but the key contamination test omits extended discrete sources and the classification is honestly left open. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.15437 v1 pith:7LU5HFXE submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.CO

Two-component large-scale radio emission in Abell 2244

M. Cianfaglione , F. De Gasperin , V. Cuciti , M. Balboni , R. J. van Weeren , C. Groeneveld , J. M. Boxelaar , M. Della Chiesa
show 4 more authors
A. Bonafede G. Di Gennaro F. Gastaldello G. Brunetti
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords galaxy clustersradio halosdiffuse radio emissionmegahalosspectral indexradio-X-ray correlationnon-thermal radiationAbell 2244
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to establish that the galaxy cluster Abell 2244 contains two distinct large-scale diffuse radio components: an inner radio halo and an extended outer component reaching roughly 800 kiloparsecs. Using low-frequency, mid-frequency, and X-ray observations, the authors measure an integrated spectral index of about 0.9 for both components, but find that only the inner halo steepens at higher frequencies. They also show that the outer component follows a much shallower radio-X-ray correlation than the halo, which points to a different physical origin. The authors argue the outer component is genuine cluster-scale diffuse emission, not a low-resolution blend of faint sources, and they place its properties between those of radio halos and megahalos, leaving two open interpretations: a halo disturbed by a minor merger with an infalling group, or a megahalo.

Core claim

The paper establishes that Abell 2244 hosts a two-component diffuse radio source: an inner low-luminosity radio halo and an extended, asymmetric shell-like outer component reaching about 800 kpc. Both are detected at 144, 813, and 1279 MHz with the same integrated spectral index of about 0.9, but only the halo steepens above 813 MHz (alpha = 1.3 ± 0.2). The outer component follows a shallower radio-X-ray correlation (slope 0.18 ± 0.06 at 813 MHz) than the halo (0.52 ± 0.06), indicating different physical origins. The authors argue the outer component is genuine diffuse emission, not a low-resolution artifact of faint sources, and classify it as intermediate between a radio halo and a megahal

What carries the argument

The central diagnostic is a two-component surface-brightness model: an inner exponential profile, as standard for radio halos, plus a projected thick shell for the outer component. This model, fitted to azimuthally averaged southern half-annuli after source subtraction, distinguishes the emission from a double exponential (which would indicate a mini-halo plus radio halo) and yields the key radii and fluxes. Supporting machinery includes point-to-point radio-X-ray correlation slopes, which separate source classes, and mock observations in which a synthetic radio halo and point-source populations are injected into simulated visibilities and imaged at low resolution to test whether unresolved

Load-bearing premise

The outer component is genuinely diffuse cluster-scale emission; if it is actually unresolved or incompletely subtracted discrete radio emission blended at low resolution, the two-component and different-origin claims collapse - and the mock tests, which inject only point sources, do not rule out extended radio galaxies that are harder to subtract.

What would settle it

Resolve the outer component at high angular resolution: if deep ~2-arcsecond imaging breaks the ~800 kpc emission into individually detected compact or extended sources whose total flux matches the measured 5.8 mJy at 813 MHz, then the diffuse interpretation is falsified. Alternatively, a mock observation that injects the actual extended radio galaxy with realistic subtraction residuals and recovers the observed outer surface-brightness profile would directly test whether the component can be an artifact.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The outer component is real cluster-scale diffuse emission reaching about 800 kpc, not a low-resolution artifact of faint point sources.
  • The inner halo and outer component share an integrated spectral index near 0.9, so a single re-acceleration event involving the infalling group could plausibly produce both components.
  • Only the inner halo steepens above 813 MHz; this spectral break is a measurable signature that can separate the two components in other clusters.
  • The shallow radio-X-ray correlation of the outer component implies its relativistic electrons are less tightly tied to the hot intracluster gas than those in the halo.
  • The radio halo is under-luminous relative to the expected radio power for its cluster mass, consistent with halos in less dynamically disturbed systems; including the outer component would raise the total diffuse luminosity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the outer component is a megahalo, its flat spectrum (alpha ~ 0.8) would contrast with the ultra-steep spectra of the few known megahalos; deep low-frequency observations near 50 MHz could discriminate, since a megahalo origin would predict strong steepening at low frequencies.
  • The mock tests exclude point sources but not extended discrete radio galaxies; injecting a realistic tailed radio galaxy with subtraction errors into the mocks - the next test the paper itself calls for - could either strengthen or overturn the diffuse interpretation.
  • A shallow radio-X-ray correlation for the outer component may be a general signature of cluster-group interaction regions; finding similar two-component systems in other intermediate-mass clusters would test whether A2244 is typical.
  • If the outer component is a merger-disturbed radio halo, that would imply minor mergers can re-accelerate electrons to hundreds of kiloparsec scales without disrupting a cool core, broadening the class of clusters expected to host extended radio emission.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents LOFAR HBA, MeerKAT UHF, MeerKAT L-band, and XMM-Newton observations of the intermediate-mass cluster Abell 2244. The authors claim that the cluster hosts a two-component diffuse radio source: an inner radio halo and an outer component extending to roughly 800 kpc. From flux densities measured in component-selected regions, they obtain an integrated spectral index α(1279/144) = 0.9 ± 0.1 for the radio halo and 0.80 ± 0.04 for the outer component; only the radio halo shows evidence of steepening between 813 and 1279 MHz. The halo is under-luminous relative to the radio power–mass relation, and the radio–X-ray point-to-point correlation for the outer component is shallower than for the halo. The authors use mock LOFAR observations to argue that blending of faint point sources cannot produce the outer component, and they speculate that the emission is either a morphologically disturbed radio halo or a megahalo.

Significance. If the two-component interpretation holds, Abell 2244 becomes an important case study for the blurring boundary between radio haloes and megahaloes in an intermediate-mass cluster with a minor merger. The paper's strengths include the combination of three radio bands, the flux-recovery injection test in Sect. 4.1, the intermediate-resolution profile check in Fig. G.1, and the first presentation of the IPSUM mock-observation pipeline. These are concrete, testable elements that go beyond a simple detection paper. The main risk is that the genuineness of the outer component is not fully isolated from the extended-source/subtraction-residual alternative, which is the same mechanism recently proposed to explain apparent megahalo emission.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 4.3 / App. F] The mock LOFAR test is the only quantitative check against the blend-of-residuals alternative for the outer component, but it injects only point sources (Case 1: real MeerKAT point-source catalogue; Case 2: uniform 3σ sources). It omits extended discrete sources. The authors concede at the end of App. F: 'These extended sources should be injected in more realistic simulations, as they are more difficult to subtract and can leave stronger subtraction residuals.' This is exactly the source class Rajpurohit et al. (2025) associate with apparent megahalo emission. Since the outer component lies toward the interacting southern group, where extended radio galaxies and residuals are present (Sect. 3.2, Fig. A.1), the test does not fully exclude the contamination alternative. The abstract's wording 'unlikely ... caused by faint sources' is narrower than the tested claim; please either include ex
  2. [Sect. 4.1 / Fig. 5] The key spectral-index comparison rests on flux densities measured in component-selected regions, not on a component-separated model. The authors themselves state that 'measuring the flux directly from the images does not allow us to disentangle the two components' and that the RH spectral index 'might be contaminated by the fainter emission from the second component.' The high-frequency slope difference (α^{1279}_{813} = 1.3 ± 0.2 for the RH vs 0.7 ± 0.2 for the outer component) is only about 2σ even before this contamination is considered. The conclusion that the outer component does not steepen should be softened, or the fluxes should be derived from the two-component fit, e.g., by integrating the best-fit model in matched apertures.
  3. [Sect. 4.4 / Figs. 9, C.1] The claimed difference in radio–X-ray correlation slopes between the two components is based on fits that exclude all cells below 2σ_rms and treat them only as upper limits not used in the fit. The authors acknowledge this can bias the slope: 'only using the points above the threshold might induce a flattening in the final result.' At 1279 MHz the outer-component correlation has p = 0.028, which is conventionally significant at the 5% level yet is described as 'not statistically significant'; the small number of points and the ignored upper limits make this fragile. The abstract's statement that the outer component 'does not follow the same radio-X-ray correlation' is stronger than the evidence. A survival-analysis treatment of the upper limits, or a restriction of the claim to 813 MHz, would be more appropriate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states α(1279/144) = 0.9 ± 0.1 for both components, but the measured values are 0.9 ± 0.1 (RH) and 0.80 ± 0.04 (outer component). They are consistent but not identical; the wording should be made precise.
  2. [Table 1] At 144 MHz, the fitted inner radius of the outer component is R_in = 238 ± 274 kpc, i.e., essentially unconstrained. The shell-model parameters, and the resulting radial extent of the outer component, should be discussed with this uncertainty in mind.
  3. [Appendix G] The intermediate-resolution (25″) profile comparison is shown for L-band only. Since the same extension in the two MeerKAT bands is a central argument for the genuineness of the outer component, state explicitly whether the UHF intermediate-resolution profile shows the same behavior.
  4. [Sect. 3.4 / Eq. (6)] The analytical flux density uses f = 0.8 at a truncation radius of 3r_e. For reproducibility, the integration radius and the origin of f = 0.8 should be stated explicitly at the point where Eq. (6) is introduced.
  5. [Sect. 4.4] In the 1279 MHz radio–X-ray analysis, the text says p = 0.028 is 'not statistically significant'. If the adopted threshold is 5%, this p-value is actually significant; if a stricter threshold is intended, say so explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the analysis is observational, quantities are measured from data, and supporting tests are genuine falsification tests rather than restatements of model inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is observational and self-contained against data. Spectral indices are computed from measured flux densities using Eq. (3), with no quantity defined in terms of the result it is used to support. The two-component claim rests on azimuthally averaged surface brightness profiles, on a comparison between a shell-plus-exponential model and a double-exponential model, and on the detection of the same outer component in two independent MeerKAT bands; it does not reduce to the fitting model by construction. The mock LOFAR tests in Sect. 4.3 and Appendix F are genuine null tests: they inject a known exponential halo plus point-source populations and check whether a spurious outer component appears, so the conclusion is falsifiable rather than circular. The paper explicitly concedes in Appendix F that 'These extended sources should be injected in more realistic simulations, as they are more difficult to subtract and can leave stronger subtraction residuals.' That is a validity limitation on the anti-blending test, not a circular step: it weakens the robustness of the claim but does not make any prediction equivalent to its input. The use of prior work, including Balboni et al. (2024) by overlapping authors, is contextual; the present paper re-derives the detection and spectral properties from new 813 MHz and 1279 MHz data rather than importing them as a substitute for evidence. Comparisons are made against independent literature values and external scaling relations. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior self-work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The central claim therefore has independent observational content, and no circular reduction can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are the surface-brightness model parameters fitted to the observed profiles, which are the empirical basis for the two-component claim. The remaining assumptions are standard data-reduction and astrophysical mapping assumptions, each explicitly stated or at least partially tested.

free parameters (3)
  • Inner halo model parameters I0, re (per frequency) = 144 MHz: 2.4±1.5 µJy/arcsec², 76±54 kpc; 813 MHz: 0.48±0.06 µJy/arcsec², 100±14 kpc; 1279 MHz: 0.37±0.07 µJy/arcsec², 68
    Fitted to the azimuthally averaged surface brightness profile in each band; these support the two-component description. The 144 MHz values are poorly constrained.
  • Outer component model parameters I1, Rin, Rout (per frequency) = 144 MHz: 0.20±0.04 µJy/arcsec², 238±274 kpc, 826±38 kpc; 813 MHz: 0.032±0.003 µJy/arcsec², 244±110 kpc, 1073±29 kpc; 127
    Fitted shell parameters for the outer component; Rin is poorly constrained at 144 and 1279 MHz, so the two-component decomposition relies on the 813 MHz fit being representative.
  • Mock injected RH parameters = I0=2.7 µJy/arcsec², re=110 kpc
    Taken from the 813 MHz fit of the inner component and used as input to the LoSiTo mock observation; these carry over the uncertainties of the fitted profile into the contamination test.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The source-subtraction procedure removes compact sources without significantly removing diffuse emission.
    The two-component detection relies on the fidelity of the uv-cut/taper subtraction (Sect. 3.2); residual artifacts near T1 and the group center are masked, but the completeness of this masking is assumed.
  • domain assumption The X-ray surface brightness after background subtraction traces the ICM distribution.
    Used in the point-to-point radio-X-ray correlation (Sect. 3.5); X-ray sources not associated with the ICM are masked, but the faint outskirts could still be affected by background systematics.
  • domain assumption The outer component is not produced by faint point sources or residual emission at low resolution.
    Tested via intermediate-resolution profiles and mock LOFAR observations (Appendix F), yet the mocks exclude extended discrete sources and assume perfect calibration, so the assumption is only partially validated.
  • standard math Flux calibration errors of 10% (LOFAR) and 5% (MeerKAT) are applicable.
    Adopted from Perley & Butler (2013) and Shimwell et al. (2022) for the spectral index errors (Sect. 3.4); no independent absolute-flux verification is performed.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27005 in / 12199 out tokens · 125800 ms · 2026-08-01T23:21:37.188065+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Context. In recent years, clusters have been observed that host multi-component haloes, both in non-merging and merging systems. The existence of these multi-component haloes suggests that there is no clear distinction between the single components. Aims. Abell 2244 is an intermediate-mass cluster that hosts a double component diffuse radio emission. The aim of this paper is to carry out a in-depth study of the diffuse radio emission to constrain its origin and characterize its main radio properties. Methods. In this work we present LOFAR HBA, MeerKAT UHF, and L-band observations of the cluster Abell 2244. We investigated the nature of the diffuse radio emission, combining high sensitivity radio data with XMM-Newton deep X-ray observations. We also used mock LOFAR observations to investigate contamination of the emission from faint radio sources. Results. We find an integrated spectral index of $\alpha^{1279}_{144} = 0.9 \pm 0.1$ for both components, where only the radio halo shows spectral steepening at higher frequencies. These values are comparable with the spectral indices observed in disturbed massive clusters. The outer component does not follow the same radio X-ray correlation as the radio halo, which suggests a different physical origin. Conclusions. By analysing the physical and morphological properties of the diffuse emission, we find that the characteristics of the outer component of the emission are intermediate between those of radio haloes and of known megahaloes. Hence, we speculate that the source is either a morphologically disturbed radio halo, caused by a minor merger interaction, or a megahalo but we cannot reach a final classification. From the mock observations, we find that it is unlikely that the emission is caused by faint sources at low resolutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15437 by A. Bonafede, C. Groeneveld, F. De Gasperin, F. Gastaldello, G. Brunetti, G. Di Gennaro, J. M. Boxelaar, M. Balboni, M. Cianfaglione, M. Della Chiesa, R. J. van Weeren, V. Cuciti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top: High-resolution (≈ 10′′) MeerKAT UHF band image with the contours of the diffuse radio emission observed at low resolutions (≈ 60′′) overlaid. The noise level is σrms = 10 µJy/beam. Bottom left: High-resolution (≈ 6 ′′) LOFAR HBA image. The dashed circles highlight the peculiar sources. The rms is σrms = 120 µJy/beam. Bottom right: High-resolution (≈ 8 ′′) MeerKAT L-band image. The noise is σrms = 8 µ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: XMM-Newton image of A2244 highlighting the presence of the X-ray bridge and the interacting group. The contours are set at [2, 4, 8]× σrms, where σrms = 1.5 · 10−8 counts/s. The white circle is r500. and small centroid shift, the ICM distribution shows asymme￾tries, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Low-resolution images of A2244 in LOFAR HBA (left), MeerKAT UHF (middle), and MeerKAT L (right) bands. The beam sizes are 72.1 ′′ ×64.8 ′′, 61.2 ′′ ×60.2 ′′ , and 57.5 ′′ ×55.4 ′′ , respectively. The contours are set at levels of [−3, 2, 4, 8, 16]·σrms, where σrms = 340 µJy/beam, σrms = 40 µJy/beam,, and σrms = 32 µJy/beam for HBA, UHF, and L-band. The beam size is shown in the bottom right corner of the i… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Surface brightness profiles at 144 MHz (left), 813 MHz (middle), and 1279 MHz (right) of the diffuse emission. The solid black line is the fitted profile. The dotted red line is the 1σ detection limit in each annulus. The vertical dashed line is r500. tion et al. 2021), totalling 22.7 ks of observation time, which allows a uniform mapping of the cluster X-ray emission within r500. These data were already p… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Integrated spectrum of the RH (left) and of the outer component (right) in A2244 between 144 MHz and 1279 MHz. The spectral index for the RH was computed in an area with radii between zero and ∼ 300 kpc, while for the outer component the area has an inner radius of ∼ 450 kpc and outer radius of ∼ 800 kpc. The regions are shown in Fig. B.1. Calibration Pipeline solutions; 2. self-calibration of the data on … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Radio power-mass relation for the Planck clusters of the LoTSS￾DR2 Planck Survey. The black points and the dashed line are the powers and best-fit relation reported by Cuciti et al. (2023). In red we show the radio power at 150 MHz of A2244 considering only the RH. The grey arrows show the upper limits derived by Bruno et al. (2023b). rescaled model is S ν = 25 ± 4 mJy, while the flux density of the outer … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spectral index radial profile between 813 MHz and 1279 MHz. The grey shaded area shows the transition region from the exponential profile to the outer component. 4.2. Spectral index We produced the spectral index map of the diffuse radio emis￾sion using only the MeerKAT images, as in the LOFAR HBA image the outer component is not fully detected at a 3σrms level. To make the spectral index map, we convolved… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radio-X-ray surface brightness correlation at 813 MHz. We show the points related to the RH emission in green and the points from the outer emission in purple. The green line is the best-fit line for the RH correlation and in purple the best-fit relation for the outer emission. The bands show the 95% confidence region of the regression lines. The rms is 0.012 µJy/arcsec2 . The upper limits correspond to th… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Optical (background, DESI), X-ray (blue, XMM-Newton), and radio (MeerKAT UHF) composite image of A2244. ery of such faint diffuse emission is expanding our knowledge on the physical processes that are taking place in clusters, and with these observations we are pushing the limits of what is achiev￾able with the current instruments. With the advent of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA; Dewdney et al. 2009), … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 76 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Diffuse Radio Emission from Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0584-z , archivePrefix =. 1901.04496 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  2. [2]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D , keywords =

    Cosmic Rays in Galaxy Clusters and Their Nonthermal Emission. International Journal of Modern Physics D , keywords =. doi:10.1142/S0218271814300079 , archivePrefix =. 1401.7519 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    LOFAR: The LOw-Frequency ARray. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220873 , archivePrefix =. 1305.3550 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Galaxy clusters enveloped by vast volumes of relativistic electrons. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05149-3 , archivePrefix =. 2209.13617 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Comparative analysis of the diffuse radio emission in the galaxy clusters A1835, A2029, and Ophiuchus. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911659 , archivePrefix =. 0901.1943 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1943

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Exploring the origins of mega radio halos. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346784 , archivePrefix =. 2306.03764 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Cosmological simulations of the generation of cluster-scale radio emission from turbulent re-acceleration. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450763 , archivePrefix =. 2406.09859 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. I. Survey description and preliminary data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629313 , archivePrefix =. 1611.02700 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. V. Second data release. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142484 , archivePrefix =. 2202.11733 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Science Advances , keywords =

    Magnetic fields and relativistic electrons fill entire galaxy cluster. Science Advances , keywords =. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq7623 , archivePrefix =. 2211.01493 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    The Planck clusters in the LOFAR sky. I. LoTSS-DR2: New detections and sample overview. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202143020 , archivePrefix =. 2202.11720 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Systematic effects in LOFAR data: A unified calibration strategy. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833867 , archivePrefix =. 1811.07954 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Extraction and self-calibration of individual LOFAR targets

    LOFAR observations of galaxy clusters in HETDEX. Extraction and self-calibration of individual LOFAR targets. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039826 , archivePrefix =. 2011.02387 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  14. [14]

    The LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey: Deep Fields Data Release 1. I. Direction-dependent calibration and imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038804 , archivePrefix =. 2011.08328 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    LOFAR Facet Calibration. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/223/1/2 , archivePrefix =. 1601.05422 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    LOFAR 150-MHz observations of the Bo \"o tes field: catalogue and source counts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1056 , archivePrefix =. 1605.01531 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    Radio interferometric gain calibration as a complex optimization problem. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv418 , archivePrefix =. 1502.06974 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Faceting for direction-dependent spectral deconvolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731474 , archivePrefix =. 1712.02078 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Offringa, A. R. and McKinley, B. and Hurley-Walker and others , title =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  20. [20]

    Offringa, A. R. and Smirnov, O. , title =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  21. [21]

    The Planck clusters in the LOFAR sky. II. LoTSS-DR2: Recovering diffuse extended emission with LOFAR. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244552 , archivePrefix =. 2301.08121 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    , keywords =

    Clusters of galaxies: observational properties of the diffuse radio emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-012-0054-z , archivePrefix =. 1205.1919 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1919

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Constraining the population of cosmic ray protons in cooling flow clusters with -ray and radio observations: Are radio mini-halos of hadronic origin?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031464 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031464

  24. [24]

    , keywords =

    Turbulence and Radio Mini-halos in the Sloshing Cores of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/78 , archivePrefix =. 1203.2994 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Radial Profiles of Radio Halos in Massive Galaxy Clusters: Diffuse Giants Over 2 Mpc. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.05415 , archivePrefix =. 2505.05415 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.05415

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Investigating ionospheric calibration for LOFAR 2.0 with simulated observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140465 , archivePrefix =. 2105.04636 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder

  28. [28]

    The Planck clusters in the LOFAR sky. V. LoTSS-DR2: Mass-radio halo power correlation at low frequency. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346755 , archivePrefix =. 2305.04564 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Radio halos in a mass-selected sample of 75 galaxy clusters. II. Statistical analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039208 , archivePrefix =. 2101.01641 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    An Accurate Flux Density Scale from 1 to 50 GHz. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/19 , archivePrefix =. 1211.1300 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    The flat entropy profile at the outskirts of the Abell 2244 galaxy cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3525 , archivePrefix =. 2212.05080 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Two Clusters of Galaxies with Radio-quiet Cooling Cores. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/462416 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508587 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    , keywords =

    CHEX-MATE: Morphological analysis of the sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243470 , archivePrefix =. 2205.11326 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling radio halos in galaxy clusters in the LOFAR era. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913063 , archivePrefix =. 0910.2025 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    LOFAR high-band antenna observations of the Perseus cluster: The discovery of a giant radio halo. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451618 , archivePrefix =. 2410.02863 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Compression of interferometric radio-astronomical data. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629565 , archivePrefix =. 1609.02019 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI , year = 2007, editor =

    CASA Architecture and Applications. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI , year = 2007, editor =

    2007

  38. [38]

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , eprint =

    PASP , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , eprint =

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

  39. [39]

    Reference Flux Scale for MeerKAT: Long Term Observation and Field Modelling of PKS B0407-65 , author =

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    CHEX-MATE: A LOFAR pilot X-ray - radio study on five radio halo clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347965 , archivePrefix =. 2402.18654 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Galaxies , keywords =

    The Seeding of Cosmic Ray Electrons by Cluster Radio Galaxies: A Review. Galaxies , keywords =. doi:10.3390/galaxies12020019 , archivePrefix =. 2403.16068 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    On the Nonthermal Emission and Acceleration of Electrons in Coma and Other Clusters of Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/321557 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0101145 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Particle reacceleration in the Coma cluster: radio properties and hard X-ray emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03978.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008518 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2001

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    The universal galaxy cluster pressure profile from a representative sample of nearby systems (REXCESS) and the Y _ SZ - M _ 500 relation. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913416 , archivePrefix =. 0910.1234 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Intracluster Medium Entropy Profiles for a Chandra Archival Sample of Galaxy Clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/12 , archivePrefix =. 0902.1802 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA , year = 2016, month = jan, eid =

    The MeerKAT Radio Telescope. MeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA , year = 2016, month = jan, eid =. doi:10.22323/1.277.0001 , adsurl =

    doi:10.22323/1.277.0001 2016

  47. [47]

    2025 , eprint=

    CHEX-MATE: New detections and properties of the radio diffuse emission in massive clusters with MeerKAT , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  48. [48]

    Calibration of MeerKAT data and radio/X-ray spectral mapping of the cluster

    The prototypical major cluster merger Abell 754: I. Calibration of MeerKAT data and radio/X-ray spectral mapping of the cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451293 , archivePrefix =. 2406.18983 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    DPPP: Default Pre-Processing Pipeline

  50. [50]

    DP3: Streaming processing pipeline for radio interferometric data

  51. [51]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 1995, series =

    High Fidelity Interferometric Imaging: Robust Weighting and NNLS Deconvolution. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 1995, series =

    1995

  52. [52]

    AOFlagger: RFI Software

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    A morphological algorithm for improving radio-frequency interference detection. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118497 , archivePrefix =. 1201.3364 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Modeling the interaction between ICM and relativistic plasma in cooling flows: The case of the Perseus cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020284 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202279 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    A ``MeerKAT-meets-LOFAR'' study of the complex multi-component (mini-)halo in the extreme sloshing cluster Abell 2142. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348944 , archivePrefix =. 2403.00414 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    LOFAR detection of extended emission around a mini halo in the galaxy cluster Abell 1413. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347635 , archivePrefix =. 2308.01884 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    A comparison of radio and X-ray morphologies of four clusters of galaxies containing radio halos. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010115 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0101418 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    , keywords =

    Spectral properties and origin of the radio halo in A3562. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053016 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0505614 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    A 3.5 Mpc long radio relic in the galaxy cluster ClG 0217+70. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141428 , archivePrefix =. 2106.00679 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Radio and X-ray connection in radio mini-halos: Implications for hadronic models. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937207 , archivePrefix =. 2006.09254 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    How unusual is the cool-core radio halo cluster CL1821+643?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw796 , archivePrefix =. 1608.01819 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [62]

    The Cluster HEritage project with XMM-Newton: Mass Assembly and Thermodynamics at the Endpoint of structure formation. I. Programme overview. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039632 , archivePrefix =. 2010.11972 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    CHEX-MATE: Constraining the origin of the scatter in galaxy cluster radial X-ray surface brightness profiles. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346189 , archivePrefix =. 2305.03082 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    , keywords =

    The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: The MOS cameras. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000087 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0011498 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    , keywords =

    A catalog of galaxy clusters observed by XMM-Newton. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077930 , archivePrefix =. 0710.2241 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Deconstructing the Spectrum of the Soft X-Ray Background. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317071 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/317071

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    The Beautiful Mess in Abell 2255. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9a2f , archivePrefix =. 2006.04808 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    Linear Regression for Astronomical Data with Measurement Errors and Intrinsic Scatter. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/177901 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9605002 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Science , keywords =

    A Universal Scaling for the Energetics of Relativistic Jets from Black Hole Systems. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1227416 , archivePrefix =. 1212.3343 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    , keywords =

    First evidence of a connection between cluster-scale diffuse radio emission in cool-core galaxy clusters and sloshing features. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348045 , archivePrefix =. 2403.09802 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    A three-component giant radio halo: The puzzling case of the galaxy cluster Abell 2142. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347245 , archivePrefix =. 2308.07603 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14) , year = 2015, month = apr, eid =

    The SKA view of cool-core clusters: evolution of radio mini-halos and AGN feedback. Advancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14) , year = 2015, month = apr, eid =. doi:10.22323/1.215.0076 , archivePrefix =. 1412.5664 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  73. [73]

    IEEE Proceedings , year = 2009, month = aug, volume =

    The Square Kilometre Array. IEEE Proceedings , year = 2009, month = aug, volume =. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021005 , adsurl =

    arXiv 2009

  74. [74]

    Planck 2015 results. XXVII. The second Planck catalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich sources. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525823 , archivePrefix =. 1502.01598 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Origin and transport of electrons in the halo radio source in the Coma cluster. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/155011 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/155011

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    The ultra-steep diffuse radio emission observed in the cool-core cluster RX J1720.1+2638 with LOFAR at 54 MHz. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2840 , archivePrefix =. 2110.01629 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    A LOFAR study of non-merging massive galaxy clusters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833882 , archivePrefix =. 1811.08410 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [78]

    The Planck clusters in the LOFAR sky. III. LoTSS-DR2: Dynamic states and density fluctuations of the intracluster medium. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244761 , archivePrefix =. 2210.07284 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Science , keywords =

    A radio ridge connecting two galaxy clusters in a filament of the cosmic web. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.aat7500 , archivePrefix =. 1906.07584 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    A giant radio bridge connecting two galaxy clusters in Abell 1758. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa142 , archivePrefix =. 2008.09613 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

Showing first 80 references.