Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 94 references

Controlling charge and spin currents through nonreciprocal dissipative processes

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two nonreciprocal dissipative channels can generate and control both charge and spin currents in a Rashba-coupled fermionic lattice.

desk verdict A careful, well-written proposal for dissipative generation of switchable charge and spin currents in a Rashba-Zeeman lattice; the physics is plausible, but the central numbers rest on an unbenchmarked tGGE approximation and need an exact small-system check. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15767 v1 pith:EU7QAWLF submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Catalin-Mihai Halati , Jean-Sébastien Bernier This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph MSC 81V7082C10 PACS 67.85.-d72.25.-b
keywords nonreciprocaldissipationchargecurrentsspinRashbaspin-orbitcouplingopenquantumsystemstime-dependentgeneralizedGibbsensemblecoldatomsLindbladmasterequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that steady-state charge and spin currents can be produced and steered in a two-dimensional lattice of spinful fermions without boundary reservoirs, magnetic flux, or gauge fields, using only two carefully chosen dissipative processes. The authors argue that when particles can hop while dissipatively coupled to a particular spatial direction depending on their spin, and when the lattice has both Rashba spin-orbit coupling and a magnetic field, the open system relaxes to a current-carrying steady state even in the weakly dissipative regime. The key handle is a single phase in the dissipative hopping: changing it tunes the size, sign, and dominant type of current, letting one switch between spin-dominated and charge-dominated transport. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a minimal, experimentally plausible route to generating and controlling spin and charge flow in cold-atom quantum simulators.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair of nonreciprocal jump operators L^NR,x_up and L^NR,y_down, dissipative hopping processes that give a spin-dependent directionality: an up-spin particle hops along x with a phase-shifted amplitude between left and right neighbors, and a down-spin particle does the same along y. Together they act as a dissipative analogue of spin-orbit coupling--coupling each spin species to a different spatial direction--but without spin flips. The analysis is carried out with a time-dependent generalized Gibbs ensemble (tGGE), which approximates the weakly dissipative steady state as a thermal ensemble diagonal in the occupations of the Hamiltonian's quasiparticle modes, yieldi

What would settle it

Solve the exact Lindblad master equation numerically for a small lattice (e.g., 4x4) with the same noninteracting Hamiltonian and the two jump operators L^NR,x_up and L^NR,y_down, and compare the steady-state charge and spin currents to the tGGE predictions across a range of phase phi and field alpha/h; any significant mismatch in sign, magnitude, or phi-dependence would indicate that the weak-dissipation GGE ansatz misses essential coherences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the combined action of two nonreciprocal jump operators--one correlating up-spin particles with motion along x, and one correlating down-spin particles with motion along y--is sufficient to generate both finite charge currents and finite spin currents in the steady state, provided the Hamiltonian contains finite tunneling, Rashba spin-orbit coupling, and a magnetic field. The nonreciprocal phase phi in these jump operators controls the magnitude and direction of both currents, and can even determine which type of transport dominates: spin currents peak at phi where charge currents vanish, while charge currents peak near phi approximately 1.6857. The magnetic field i

Load-bearing premise

The steady state is assumed to be well described by a generalized Gibbs ensemble diagonal in the occupations of the noninteracting Hamiltonian's quasiparticle modes, which ignores coherences between modes and higher-order corrections in the dissipation strength; if that ansatz fails for this nonreciprocal Rashba model, the computed currents would be unreliable.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A minimal two-jump-operator recipe can generate steady-state bulk currents with no external reservoir or gauge field, simplifying possible cold-atom implementations.
  • The nonreciprocal phase phi provides a single control knob for the magnitude, direction, and type (spin vs. charge) of the steady-state current, which is a practical handle for transport engineering.
  • The magnetic field is not a perturbation but a necessary ingredient: without it the predicted currents vanish identically, so any experimental test must include a nonzero Zeeman field.
  • The mechanism is robust to moderate dephasing, so it should still function in realistic experimental environments where perfect isolation is impossible.
  • The same tGGE machinery predicts that applying all four nonreciprocal channels (both spins in both directions) yields nontrivial occupations but zero currents, clarifying what minimal structure is needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This construction likely transfers to other lattice geometries or to ladder systems, as long as some term (a Zeeman field, a staggered potential, or a spin-dependent chemical potential) breaks the symmetry that otherwise cancels the mode contributions to the currents.
  • The paper explicitly sets aside the dissipative contribution to the currents, which is proportional to the dissipation strength; at larger Gamma, direct incoherent hopping could add to or compete with the Hamiltonian currents, so the weak-dissipation predictions may be a conservative floor rather than the full picture.
  • Because the two jump operators imitate spin-orbit coupling without spin flips, a similar pair of nonreciprocal channels could be adapted to synthesize spin-Hall-like responses or to rectify spin flow in atomtronic circuits, where controlling spin direction is the goal.
  • One could test the mechanism's reach by replacing the magnetic field with a time-periodic driving field that breaks the same symmetry, potentially extending the scheme to Floquet-engineered platforms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-dimensional spinful fermion lattice with Rashba spin-orbit coupling and a Zeeman field, subject to Markovian dissipation through nonreciprocal, particle-conserving jump operators. Using a time-dependent generalized Gibbs ensemble (tGGE) approach valid in the weak-dissipation limit, the authors derive steady-state occupations of the quasiparticle modes and from them compute charge and spin currents. The central claim is that applying two jump operators, L^{NR,x}_{↑} and L^{NR,y}_{↓}, which nonreciprocally couple each spin species to a different spatial direction, is sufficient to generate both finite charge and finite spin currents; tuning the nonreciprocal phase φ controls the magnitude, direction, and relative dominance of the two types of current. A magnetic field is shown to be necessary: in its absence a q→q+π e_x symmetry and a symmetry between + and − bands force all currents to vanish. The authors also show that the currents survive in the presence of dephasing noise.

Significance. If the tGGE results are correct, the paper offers a concrete, experimentally plausible dissipative-engineering recipe for generating and controlling charge and spin currents without reservoirs at the boundaries. Strengths include an explicit derivation of current operators from local U(1) and SU(2) gauge transformations, transparent symmetry arguments in Sec. V C, a parameter-free computation (no free parameters are fitted to the target currents), and a data-availability statement. The central physical idea — nonreciprocally coupling each spin species to a distinct spatial direction as a dissipative analogue of spin-orbit coupling — is novel and timely for the quantum active matter program. However, the quantitative predictions, including all figures in Sec. V, are produced by the tGGE ansatz, and the manuscript does not yet validate that ansatz for this particular nonreciprocal, Rashba-Zeeman model against an exact small-system calculation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV A, Eqs. (38)-(48); Sec. V] The load-bearing step is the tGGE ansatz, which approximates the steady state by a GGE diagonal in the quasiparticle occupations and neglects coherences between the + and − bands at fixed momentum as well as higher-order-in-Γ corrections. The currents are then evaluated from these occupations only, via Eqs. (52)-(53). The model is not a benchmarked special case: it combines nonreciprocal jump operators with a Rashba-Zeeman band structure that has exact q↔−q degeneracies, and no exact small-system GKSL benchmark is provided. Because the Hamiltonian and the dissipators are both quadratic, the exact steady state can be obtained for small systems by solving the covariance-matrix Lindblad equation. I request such a benchmark (e.g., L=2 or L=4, representative α/h, h/t, φ, and Γ_NR/t values) comparing occupations and currents with the tGGE predictions. Without this, the predicted magnitudes, si
  2. [Sec. III D, final paragraph] The paper computes only the Hamiltonian contributions to the currents and neglects the dissipative currents derived in Eqs. (35)-(37). The dissipative currents are proportional to Γ_NR, but the Hamiltonian currents are also first order in Γ_NR: the initial infinite-temperature state has zero currents, and the steady-state deviations of the occupations from the infinite-temperature values are themselves proportional to Γ_NR. Thus the two contributions are of the same order in the weak-dissipation limit, and discarding the dissipative currents is not automatically justified. The authors should either evaluate the dissipative current expectation values in the tGGE approximation, show by symmetry that they vanish in the steady state, or benchmark the full currents for a small system.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. V] The paper claims to identify the 'minimal set' of jump operators generating both current types. The evidence provided is that the pair {L^{NR,x}_{↑}, L^{NR,y}_{↓}} produces currents while the set of all four spin/direction operators does not. This does not exclude the possibility that a single jump operator, or a different pair, also produces currents. Either an explicit check of all subsets or a symmetry argument is needed to support the word 'minimal'; otherwise the claim should be weakened to 'sufficient'.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (4)] In the definition of L^{NR,x}_{n,m,σ}, the second term contains 'c†_{n+1,n,σ}'; this should be 'c†_{n+1,m,σ}'.
  2. [Figs. 2-5] Several axis and legend labels are garbled: e.g., 'Juc=t' should be 'J^u_c/t', '?=' should be 'φ=', and 'h=t=f0:2; 1g' should be 'h/t={0.2,1}'. These need to be corrected for readability.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. V] Minor typos: 'combine application' should be 'combined application', and 'spin-orbit couping' should be 'spin-orbit coupling'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: currents are computed from the stated Hamiltonian and jump operators via an established perturbative tGGE scheme; the unbenchmarked ansatz is a correctness concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

I traced the claimed derivation chain. The model is fixed by the Hamiltonian (Eq. 1), the nonreciprocal jump operators (Eq. 4), and the dephasing operator (Eq. 5). The steady state is obtained by solving the tGGE equations of motion (Eqs. 38-48), which follow from the external, machine-checkable/benchmarked methods of Refs. [73-75]. No free parameter is fitted to the target charge or spin currents; these are then evaluated from the resulting mode occupations through the explicit expressions (Eqs. 52-53). The central claim, that L_NR,x_up and L_NR,y_down produce finite controllable charge and spin currents, is therefore derived from the input Hamiltonian and dissipators, not defined in terms of the output. The tGGE replacement of the GKSL steady state by a GGE diagonal in quasiparticle occupations neglects coherences and higher-order-in-Gamma corrections; whether this approximation is quantitatively reliable for this nonreciprocal 2D Rashba-Zeeman model is a validation/correctness risk, not a circularity. The one self-citation [42] is used only as an antecedent for dissipative current generation and for the Hamiltonian-plus-dissipative decomposition of currents; it is not load-bearing for the present result. No equation reduces to its own inputs by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything downstream depends on these modeling choices; no numerical parameter is fitted to target currents, and the model contains no invented particles or forces. The tGGE approximation and the neglect of dissipative currents are the largest ledger entries.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The GKSL master equation with jump operators (4)-(5) describes the physics.
    Markovian, weak-coupling open-system treatment used throughout Sec. II; standard for ultracold gases but not derived from a microscopic reservoir model in this paper.
  • domain assumption Weak-dissipation steady state lies in the tGGE manifold spanned by quasiparticle occupations.
    Sec. IV A-B (Eqs. 38-48); inherited from Refs [73-75] and not benchmarked for this model; if coherences or higher-order corrections matter, computed currents can change.
  • domain assumption Current observables are defined by U(1)/SU(2) gauge derivatives; dissipative current contributions are neglected in the weak-coupling limit.
    Sec. III; the gauge-construction definition is a modeling choice, and Sec. III D notes dissipative currents are omitted for small dissipation.
  • domain assumption The nonreciprocal jump operators can be realized by Raman transitions with very short-lived photon modes.
    Sec. II B; needed for experimental relevance but not demonstrated experimentally.
  • domain assumption Half-filled 10x10 lattice with periodic boundary conditions and infinite-temperature initial state represents the regime of interest.
    Sec. V; finite-size and boundary effects are not analyzed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Controlling charge and spin currents through nonreciprocal dissipative processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EU7QAWLF

@misc{pith2026260715767,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Controlling charge and spin currents through nonreciprocal dissipative processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EU7QAWLF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15767}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the generation and control of both charge and spin currents via nonreciprocal dissipative mechanisms in a two-dimensional spinful fermionic atom quantum system with broken inversion and time-reversal symmetries. Within the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad master equation formalism and using an approach based on the time-dependent generalized Gibbs ensemble, we identify in the weak dissipative coupling regime the minimal set of nonreciprocal jump operators required to induce charge and spin currents and to control both their direction and magnitude. We find that in the presence of finite tunneling, Rashba coupling and magnetic field, the combine application of two jump operators nonreciprocally coupling each spin species to a different spatial direction of motion is sufficient to generate both types of current. Furthermore, by tuning the degree of nonreciprocity of the jump operators we modify the dominant transport mechanism from spin to charge. Finally, we checked that this nonreciprocal current generation mechanism is robust to the application of dephasing noise as even in the presence of this additional dissipative process the steady-state occupation distributions for the quasiparticle modes of the Hamiltonian remains non-trivial, an essential requirement to obtain non-zero currents.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15767 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Sketch of the model considering spinful fermions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Steady-state charge currents in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4: Steady-state spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Ratio of the steady-state charge currents in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Steady-state spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Momentum-dependent contributions to the spin and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Steady-state spin- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In the absence of the magnetic field In the absence of a magnetic field, the transformation diagonalizing the Hamiltonian, Eqs. (12)-(13), reduces tou ↑+(⃗k) = 1√ 2 ,u ↑−(⃗k) =− 1√ 2 ,u ↓+(⃗k) =u ↓−(⃗k) = b∗(⃗k)√ 2|b|(⃗k) , withb( ⃗k) =−2α(sink y +isink x) except for ⃗k∈ SwithS={(0,0),(0, π),(π,0),(π, π)}where Eq. (14) still holds. This leads to the follo...

  2. [2]

    (48), is still present

    Finite magnetic fields For finite magnetic fields, the⃗ q→⃗ q+π⃗ ex/y symme- try of the equations of motions, Eq. (48), is still present. However, the symmetry between the + and−eigenmodes is broken. This can be seen in the steady-state occu- pations of the eigenmodes displayed in Fig. 7(a)-(b) for h/t= 1, asn −(⃗ q) andn+(⃗ q) are clearly different. Thus...

    2021

  3. [3]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh,Towards prop- erties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Materials 16, 1077 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch,Cavity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics70, 1 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef,Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    G. T. Landi, D. Poletti, and G. Schaller,Nonequilibrium boundary-driven quantum systems: Models, methods, and properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 045006 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef,Cavity quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9, 011312 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    D. M. Kennes and A. Rubio,A New Era of Quantum Materials Mastery and Quantum Simulators In and Out of Equilibrium, inSketches of Physics: The Celebration Collection, edited by R. Citro, M. Lewenstein, A. Rubio, W. P. Schleich, J. D. Wells, and G. P. Zank (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023) pp. 1–39

    2023

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Defenu, A

    N. Defenu, A. Lerose, and S. Pappalardi,Out-of- equilibrium dynamics of quantum many-body systems with long-range interactions, Physics Reports1074, 1 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, J. Marino, and S. Diehl, Universality in driven open quantum matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.97, 025004 (2025)

    2025

  3. [11]

    Chiriac` o,Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics, Electronics14(2025), 10.3390/electron- ics14173552

    G. Chiriac` o,Non-Equilibrium Quantum Materials for Electronics, Electronics14(2025), 10.3390/electron- ics14173552

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller,Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nature Physics4, 878 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller,Preparation of entangled states by quantum Markov processes, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

    2008

  6. [14]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac,Quan- tum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nature Physics5, 633 (2009)

    2009

  7. [15]

    Weimer, M

    H. Weimer, M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. B¨ uchler,A Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature Physics 6, 382 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    M¨ uller, S

    M. M¨ uller, S. Diehl, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller,En- gineered Open Systems and Quantum Simulations with Atoms and Ions,Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics,61, 1 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Bernier, P

    J.-S. Bernier, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, and C. Kollath, Emergence of spatially extended pair coherence through incoherent local environmental coupling, Phys. Rev. A87, 063608 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    Bardyn, M

    C.-E. Bardyn, M. A. Baranov, E. Rico, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl,Majorana Modes in Driven- Dissipative Atomic Superfluids with a Zero Chern Num- ber, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 130402 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Bardyn, M

    C.-E. Bardyn, M. A. Baranov, C. V. Kraus, E. Rico, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl,Topology by dissi- pation, New Journal of Physics15, 085001 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    J. C. Budich, P. Zoller, and S. Diehl,Dissipative prepara- tion of Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. A91, 042117 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Sheikhan, F

    A. Sheikhan, F. Brennecke, and C. Kollath,Cavity- induced generation of nontrivial topological states in a two-dimensional Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A94, 061603 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    Mivehvar, H

    F. Mivehvar, H. Ritsch, and F. Piazza,Superradiant Topological Peierls Insulator inside an Optical Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 073602 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Sciolla, D

    B. Sciolla, D. Poletti, and C. Kollath,Two-Time Corre- lations Probing the Dynamics of Dissipative Many-Body Quantum Systems: Aging and Fast Relaxation, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 170401 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Gut ¸˘ a, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan,Towards a Theory of Metastability in Open Quan- tum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 240404 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    E. C. King, L. Giannelli, R. Menu, J. N. Kriel, and G. Morigi,Adiabatic quantum trajectories in engineered reservoirs, Quantum8, 1428 (2024). 15

    2024

  18. [26]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, G. Morigi, and C. Kollath, Controlling the Dynamics of Atomic Correlations via the Coupling to a Dissipative Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 073604 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    Fruchart and V

    M. Fruchart and V. Vitelli,Nonreciprocal many-body physics(2026), arXiv:2602.11111 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2026

  20. [28]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk,Nonreciprocal Photon Transmission and Amplification via Reservoir Engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    M. Keck, D. Rossini, and R. Fazio,Persistent currents by reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. A98, 053812 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Yamamoto, Y

    K. Yamamoto, Y. Ashida, and N. Kawakami,Rectifica- tion in nonequilibrium steady states of open many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043343 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp,Topo- logical framework for directional amplification in driven- dissipative cavity arrays, Nature Communications11, 3149 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Adachi, K

    K. Adachi, K. Takasan, and K. Kawaguchi,Activity- induced phase transition in a quantum many-body system, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013194 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Yamagishi, N

    M. Yamagishi, N. Hatano, and H. Obuse,Proposal of a quantum version of active particles via a nonunitary quantum walk, Scientific Reports14, 28648 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Takasan, K

    K. Takasan, K. Adachi, and K. Kawaguchi,Activity- induced ferromagnetism in one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023096 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    G. Lee, T. Jin, Y.-X. Wang, A. McDonald, and A. Clerk,Entanglement Phase Transition Due to Reci- procity Breaking without Measurement or Postselection, PRX Quantum5, 010313 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    C. P. Zelle, R. Daviet, A. Rosch, and S. Diehl,Uni- versal Phenomenology at Critical Exceptional Points of NonequilibriumO(N)Models, Phys. Rev. X14, 021052 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Brighi and A

    P. Brighi and A. Nunnenkamp,Nonreciprocal dynamics and the non-Hermitian skin effect of repulsively bound pairs, Phys. Rev. A110, L020201 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Khasseh, S

    R. Khasseh, S. Wald, R. Moessner, C. A. Weber, and M. Heyl,Active Quantum Flocks, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 248302 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Nadolny, C

    T. Nadolny, C. Bruder, and M. Brunelli,Nonreciprocal Synchronization of Active Quantum Spins, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011010 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Belyansky, C

    R. Belyansky, C. Weis, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and A. A. Clerk,Phase Transitions in Nonreciprocal Driven- Dissipative Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 123401 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    A. P. Antonov, Y. Zheng, B. Liebchen, and H. L¨ owen, Engineering active motion in quantum matter, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033008 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Hanai, D

    R. Hanai, D. Ootsuki, and R. Tazai,Photoinduced non- reciprocal magnetism, Nature Communications16, 8195 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Penner, L

    A.-G. Penner, L. Viotti, R. Fazio, L. Arrachea, and F. von Oppen,Heat-to-motion conversion for quantum active matter, Phys. Rev. B112, L180303 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Halati,Dissipative Generation of Currents by Nonreciprocal Local and Global Environments(2025), arXiv:2510.07498 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    C.-M. Halati,Dissipative Generation of Currents by Nonreciprocal Local and Global Environments(2025), arXiv:2510.07498 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    2025

  37. [45]

    Y.-B. Shi, R. Moessner, R. Alert, and M. Bukov,Hamil- tonian description of non-reciprocal interactions, Nature Physics (2026), 10.1038/s41567-026-03317-0

    2026 doi

  38. [46]

    March´ e, H

    A. March´ e, H. Yoshida, A. Nardin, H. Katsura, and L. Mazza,Open quantum spin chains with non-reciprocity: a theoretical approach based on the time-dependent generalized Gibbs ensemble(2026), arXiv:2601.08606 [quant-ph]

    2026

  39. [47]

    Gipouloux, M

    J. Gipouloux, M. Brunelli, L. Cugliandolo, R. Fazio, and M. Schir` o,Active Quantum Particles from Engineered Dissipation(2026), arXiv:2603.19094 [quant-ph]

    2026

  40. [48]

    R. D. Soares, M. Brunelli, and M. Schir` o,Dissipative Phase Transition of Interacting Nonreciprocal Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 250403 (2026)

    2026

  41. [49]

    B¨ uttiker, Y

    M. B¨ uttiker, Y. Imry, and R. Landauer,Josephson be- havior in small normal one-dimensional rings, Physics Letters A96, 365 (1983)

    1983

  42. [50]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  43. [51]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P.¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spiel- man,Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Re- ports on Progress in Physics77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Orignac and T

    E. Orignac and T. Giamarchi,Meissner effect in a bosonic ladder, Phys. Rev. B64, 144515 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch,Observation of chiral currents with ultracold atoms in bosonic ladders, Nature Physics 10, 588 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Halati and T

    C.-M. Halati and T. Giamarchi,Bose-Hubbard triangu- lar ladder in an artificial gauge field, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013126 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Molinelli, J

    M. Molinelli, J. C. Wang, J. G. C. Martinez, S. Lowe, A. Osborne, R. Samajdar, and A. A. Houck,Chiral and bond-ordered phases in a triangular- ladder superconducting-qubit quantum simulator(2026), arXiv:2603.16993 [quant-ph]

    2026

  48. [56]

    Buser, S

    M. Buser, S. Greschner, U. Schollw¨ ock, and T. Gia- marchi,Probing the Hall Voltage in Synthetic Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 030501 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Citro, T

    R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, and E. Orignac,Hall Response in Interacting Bosonic and Fermionic Ladders, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 056501 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Halati and T

    C.-M. Halati and T. Giamarchi,Exploring frustration ef- fects of strongly interacting bosons via the Hall response, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013199 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    T.-W. Zhou, G. Cappellini, D. Tusi, L. Franchi, J. Par- ravicini, C. Repellin, S. Greschner, M. Inguscio, T. Gia- marchi, M. Filippone, J. Catani, and L. Fallani,Obser- vation of universal Hall response in strongly interacting Fermions, Science381, 427 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, S. Huh, C. Schweizer, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger,Local Read- out and Control of Current and Kinetic Energy Operators in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 063401 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Huh, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger,Strongly interacting Meissner phases in large bosonic flux ladders, Nature Physics21, 895 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    B. Du, R. Suresh, S. L´ opez, J. Cadiente, and R. Ma, Probing Site-Resolved Current in Strongly Interacting Su- perconducting Circuit Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 060601 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Zheng and N

    W. Zheng and N. R. Cooper,Superradiance Induced Par- ticle Flow via Dynamical Gauge Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 175302 (2016)

    2016

  56. [64]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma,Spintronics: Fun- 16 damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  57. [65]

    Maekawa, S

    S. Maekawa, S. O. Valenzuela, E. Saitoh, and T. Kimura, eds.,Spin Current(Oxford University Press, 2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    Maekawa, T

    S. Maekawa, T. Kikkawa, H. Chudo, J. Ieda, and E. Saitoh,Spin and spin current—From fundamentals to recent progress, Journal of Applied Physics133, 020902 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    J. E. Hirsch,Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1834 (1999)

    1999

  60. [68]

    Murakami, N

    S. Murakami, N. Nagaosa, and S.-C. Zhang,Dissipa- tionless Quantum Spin Current at Room Temperature, Science301, 1348 (2003)

    2003

  61. [69]

    Sinova, D

    J. Sinova, D. Culcer, Q. Niu, N. A. Sinitsyn, T. Jung- wirth, and A. H. MacDonald,Universal Intrinsic Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 126603 (2004)

    2004

  62. [70]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth,Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  63. [71]

    Y. A. Bychkov and ´E. I. Rashba,Properties of a 2D elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP lett39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  64. [72]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine,New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nature Materials14, 871 (2015)

    2015

  65. [73]

    Lange, S

    F. Lange, S. Ejima, J. Fujimoto, T. Shirakawa, H. Fehske, S. Yunoki, and S. Maekawa,Generation of Current Vor- tex by Spin Current in Rashba Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 157202 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    Fujimoto, F

    J. Fujimoto, F. Lange, S. Ejima, T. Shirakawa, H. Fehske, S. Yunoki, and S. Maekawa,Spin–charge conversion and current vortex in spin–orbit coupled systems, APL Mate- rials9, 060904 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Lange, Z

    F. Lange, Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, and A. Rosch,Pumping approx- imately integrable systems, Nature Communications8, 15767 (2017)

    2017

  68. [76]

    Lange, Z

    F. Lange, Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, and A. Rosch,Time-dependent generalized Gibbs ensembles in open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B97, 165138 (2018)

    2018

  69. [77]

    Lenarˇ ciˇ c, F

    Z. Lenarˇ ciˇ c, F. Lange, and A. Rosch,Perturbative ap- proach to weakly driven many-particle systems in the presence of approximate conservation laws, Phys. Rev. B97, 024302 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level sys- tems, Journal of Mathematical Physics17, 821 (1976)

    1976

  71. [79]

    Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad,On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  72. [80]

    Carmichael,An open systems approach to quantum optics(Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

    H. Carmichael,An open systems approach to quantum optics(Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1991)

    1991

  73. [81]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  74. [82]

    S. B. J¨ ager, T. Schmit, G. Morigi, M. J. Holland, and R. Betzholz,Lindblad Master Equations for Quantum Systems Coupled to Dissipative Bosonic Modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 063601 (2022)

    2022

  75. [83]

    C. J. Bolech and T. Giamarchi,Spontaneous emission as a bridge from Lindbladian to nonreciprocal reservoirs (2025), arXiv:2508.00689 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Schmit, C.-M

    T. Schmit, C.-M. Halati, T. Donner, G. Morigi, and S. B. J¨ ager,Master equation for a quantum gas of polarizable particles in cavities, Phys. Rev. A113, 033719 (2026)

    2026

  77. [85]

    K. V. Hovhannisyan and A. Imparato,Quantum current in dissipative systems, New Journal of Physics21, 052001 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Le´ on, C

    G. Le´ on, C. Berthod, T. Giamarchi, and A. J. Millis, Hall effect on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B78, 085105 (2008)

    2008

  79. [87]

    J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, S. D¨ urr, N. Syassen, D. M. Bauer, M. Lettner, G. Rempe, and J. I. Cirac,Dissipation- induced hard-core boson gas in an optical lattice, New Journal of Physics11, 013053 (2009)

    2009

  80. [88]

    Reiter and A

    F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen,Effective operator formal- ism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

    2012

  81. [89]

    E. M. Kessler,Generalized Schrieffer-Wolff formalism for dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. A86, 012126 (2012)

    2012

  82. [90]

    Poletti, P

    D. Poletti, P. Barmettler, A. Georges, and C. Kol- lath,Emergence of Glasslike Dynamics for Dissipative and Strongly Interacting Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 195301 (2013)

    2013

  83. [91]

    Bernier, R

    J.-S. Bernier, R. Tan, C. Guo, C. Kollath, and D. Poletti, Melting of the critical behavior of a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid under dephasing, Phys. Rev. B102, 115156 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath,Theoretical methods to treat a single dissipative bosonic mode coupled globally to an interacting many-body system, Phys. Rev. Research2, 043255 (2020)

    2020

  85. [93]

    Halati, A

    C.-M. Halati, A. Sheikhan, and C. Kollath,Break- ing strong symmetries in dissipative quantum systems: Bosonic atoms coupled to a cavity, Phys. Rev. Research 4, L012015 (2022)

    2022

  86. [94]

    Halati, and J.-S

    C.-M. Halati, and J.-S. Bernier, (2026). Figure data for article ”Controlling charge and spin currents through nonreciprocal dissipative processes” [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.21408762

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.