Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 135 references

Optical and Thermodynamic Signatures of Lorentz Symmetry Breaking in Bumblebee AdS Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in bumblebee AdS black holes, the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ consistently rescales scalar-wave propagation (via an effective refractive index), null geodesics in the eikonal limit, and extended-phase thermodynamics,

desk verdict The wave-optics part is fine; the extended thermodynamics don't add up—Eqs. (51) and (54) are not derivatives of Eq. (50), so the advertised first law, Smarr relation, and ℓmax bound are unsupported. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15827 v1 pith:KU3UTDDJ submitted 2026-07-17 gr-qc

Behzad Eslam Panah , Abdullah Guvendi , Semra Gurtas Dogan , Omar Mustafa This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords bumblebeegravityLorentzsymmetrybreakingAdSblackholeseffectiverefractiveindexnullgeodesicsholethermodynamicsheatenginesSmarrrelation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in bumblebee gravity—where a vector field acquires a nonzero vacuum expectation value—the single dimensionless parameter ℓ, which rescales the radial part of the AdS black hole metric by a factor 1+ℓ, leaves a unified imprint on three seemingly separate phenomena. Massless scalar waves see an effective refractive index whose sign determines oscillatory versus evanescent regions; in the high-frequency limit the wave phase follows the same null geodesics as geometric optics, with ℓ rescaling optical distances. The same ℓ enters the extended thermodynamics: with pressure P = −Λ(1+ℓ)/8π, the mass function generates a first law, a Smarr relation, heat capacities, and a free energy, and black holes treated as heat engines have an efficiency that rises with ℓ and respects η ≤ 1. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a way to constrain Lorentz violation: stability supplies a lower bound on ℓ and the efficiency cap supplies an upper bound, so observations of waves or thermodynamic cycles could in principle delimit the parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dimensionless bumblebee parameter ℓ = ξb² (with ℓ > −1), which multiplies the radial metric component by 1+ℓ and thereby rescales the effective cosmological term, horizon radii, curvature invariants, and optical distances. Around it, the paper builds two constructions: an effective refractive index n_eff(r,ω) arising from casting the radial Klein–Gordon equation into a Helmholtz form, which encodes propagation regions and turning points and whose high-frequency limit reproduces null geodesics; and an extended-phase-space mass function M(S,P,ℓ) = (3+8PS)√S/(6π^{1/2}√(1+ℓ)), from which temperature, volume, ℓ-work term, heat capacities, free energy, and heat-engin

What would settle it

Compute the two partial derivatives of Eq. (50): ∂M/∂P and ∂M/∂ℓ. Compare them with the paper's V and Π (Eqs. 51 and 54). If they do not match, then dM = T dS + V dP + Π dℓ is not an identity and the Smarr relation and efficiency bound are not consequences of the mass function; this single calculation settles the thermodynamic part of the paper.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ = ξb², originating from the vacuum expectation value of the bumblebee vector field, acts as a global rescaling of the radial geometry (the metric component g^rr carries a factor 1+ℓ) and that this single deformation consistently controls wave propagation, null geodesics, and thermodynamics. For scalar fields, the radial Klein–Gordon equation is cast into a Helmholtz form with an effective frequency-dependent refractive index n_eff; oscillatory regions (n_eff² > 0) and evanescent regions (n_eff² < 0) are separated by turning points, and in the eikonal limit the wave vector reproduces the null-geodesic radial momentum, so high-frequen

Load-bearing premise

The thermodynamic results all assume that the mass formula M(S,P,ℓ) satisfies the extended first law dM = T dS + V dP + Π dℓ exactly, with V and Π defined as its partial derivatives; if that identity does not hold, the Smarr relation and efficiency results do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, the effective refractive index gives a concrete wave-optics tool: the location of turning points and the boundary between oscillatory and evanescent regions shift with ℓ, so wave-scattering or imaging measurements could constrain ℓ.
  • The high-frequency correspondence means null-geodesic observations—shadows or lensing—probe the same ℓ that rescales optical distances by √(1+ℓ), connecting wave and ray tests.
  • Thermodynamic stability requires ℓ > −3π/(ΛS) − 1, and the efficiency condition η ≤ 1 imposes ℓ < ℓ_max; together these define a finite allowed window for Lorentz violation.
  • The heat-engine efficiency grows monotonically with ℓ, so comparing observed or simulated engine cycles across different ℓ values could distinguish between bumblebee scenarios.
  • The Smarr relation M = 2TS − 2PV holds in extended phase space, extending the standard AdS black hole thermodynamic structure to the Lorentz-violating case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The refractive-index formulation suggests that bumblebee AdS black holes could be mimicked by graded-index optical media in analogue-gravity experiments; the predicted ℓ-dependent turning-point shifts are a testable laboratory target that the paper does not itself pursue.
  • The upper bound on ℓ is derived for one particular rectangular P–V cycle; whether the same bound survives for other cycles (e.g., Carnot or Stirling, which coincide for static black holes) is not established here, so the bound should be read as cycle-dependent until checked.
  • A natural next step is to compute quasinormal-mode frequencies from the Helmholtz equation; the ℓ-dependent effective potential would shift the complex frequencies, offering a sharper observational signature than the refractive index alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper investigates scalar-wave propagation, null geodesics, and extended-phase thermodynamics of the static, spherically symmetric bumblebee AdS black hole. The radial Klein-Gordon equation is reduced to a Helmholtz form with an effective refractive index, and the high-frequency limit is matched to null geodesics. In the thermodynamic part, the mass M(S,P,ell) of Eq. (50) is used to define T, V, Pi via partial derivatives, to state an extended first law and Smarr relation, and to compute heat-engine efficiency for a rectangular cycle. The paper claims that the efficiency increases with ell and that eta <= 1 yields an upper bound ell_max.

Significance. The wave-optics and geodesic portions are internally consistent and self-contained: they introduce no fitted constants, state the metric and field equations explicitly, and demonstrate the eikonal correspondence. If the thermodynamic results were correct, they would provide a unified and phenomenologically useful framework. However, direct differentiation of Eq. (50) contradicts Eqs. (51) and (54), so the extended first law, Smarr relation, and heat-engine efficiency in Sec. V do not follow. The advertised monotonic increase of efficiency with ell is an artifact of inconsistent thermodynamic definitions. Only the wave/geodesic part survives; the paper's main claim, as stated in the abstract, is not supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [V.A, Eqs. (50)-(54)] Direct differentiation gives partial M/partial P = 4 S^{3/2}/(3 sqrt(pi) sqrt(1+ell)) and partial M/partial ell = -(3+8PS) sqrt(S)/(12 sqrt(pi)(1+ell)^{3/2}). Eq. (51) has sqrt(1+ell) in the numerator instead of the denominator, and Eq. (54) has the opposite sign and (8PS-3) instead of -(3+8PS). Thus Eq. (53) is not an identity for the V and Pi stated, and the Smarr relation (55), which requires M=2TS-2PV with V as defined, holds only at ell=0. Since the heat capacity, free energy, stability window, and heat-engine analysis all use these quantities, this is a load-bearing inconsistency.
  2. [V.B, Eq. (64)] For the rectangle cycle, W = (P1-P4)[V(S2)-V(S1)]. With the correct V=partial M/partial P, W = 4(P1-P4)(sqrt(S2)-sqrt(S1))(S1+S2+sqrt(S1 S2))/(3 sqrt(pi) sqrt(1+ell)); with the paper's Eq. (51), the same expression has sqrt(1+ell) in the numerator. Eq. (64) contains no ell dependence, so it is not obtained from either volume. The efficiency formula (66) inherits this error: with the correct V, both W and QH in Eq. (65) scale as 1/sqrt(1+ell), making eta independent of ell, contrary to the central claim that eta increases with ell. The figures and abstract therefore report an effect that the equations do not produce.
  3. [V.B, Eq. (67)] The proposed upper bound ell_max cannot be a valid dimensionless expression. In units c=G=1, S has dimension L^2 and P has dimension L^-2, so A1 ~ L^2 while the remaining terms in Eq. (67) are dimensionless; adding them is dimensionally inconsistent. Moreover, solving eta <= 1 from Eq. (66) gives a rational constraint, not Eq. (67), and no derivation is supplied. Consequently the claimed window -3 pi/(Lambda S)-1 < ell < ell_max is not established.
minor comments (3)
  1. [General] Typographical errors: 'W e' at the beginning of Sec. I, 'simoultaneously' in Sec. V.A, and inconsistent use of 'ell' vs 'l' around Eq. (67). Please unify notation throughout.
  2. [Figures] The figures use different parameter sets (Fig. 1: m0=1, Lambda=-0.1; Fig. 3: M=1, Lambda=-2.5) without clearly distinguishing the metric parameter m0 from the AMD mass M. Captions and text should specify units and parameter conventions.
  3. [V.B] The statement that Carnot and Stirling cycles become equivalent because C_V=0 is terse; a sentence explaining that C_V=0 makes isochoric processes adiabatic would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the thermodynamic inconsistencies are arithmetic errors, not input-output equivalence.

full rationale

Walking the claimed derivation chain, the only input not re-derived is the bumblebee AdS metric, which is taken from prior literature including [15] by one of the present authors; but it is a known exact solution and is not used as a uniqueness or ansatz argument. The scalar-wave equation, effective refractive index, turning points, and geodesic correspondence are all derived from this metric by standard substitutions; there is no fitted constant masquerading as a prediction. In the thermodynamic section, M(S,P,ℓ) is obtained from the horizon condition and the AMD mass, and the surface-gravity temperature coincides with ∂M/∂S, providing independent content. The extended first law is written as a total differential of this M; however Eqs. (51) and (54) do not equal the partial derivatives of Eq. (50), so the subsequent Smarr relation and heat-engine efficiency do not follow as written. That is a correctness/consistency defect, not a circular equivalence: the quantities are not being defined so that the claimed results are true by construction. Self-citations are present, but they are contextual reuse rather than load-bearing uniqueness theorems or fitted inputs. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes no new entities or fitted parameters beyond the model's existing ℓ. It reuses the bumblebee metric, area-law entropy, AMD mass, and pressure definition from prior literature (principally [15]), so the ledger is short; the internal thermodynamic inconsistency is not a missing axiom but an arithmetic error within the adopted framework.

free parameters (1)
  • ℓ (bumblebee parameter)
    Dimensionless parameter from the bumblebee VEV, ℓ = ξb². It is an input from [15,16], not fitted to data; all claims are functions of it.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The bumblebee action (1) with the radial VEV Bµ=(0,br,0,0) admits the static spherically symmetric solution (2)-(3) for ℓ > −1.
    Imported from [15,16]; not re-derived. All subsequent results inherit it.
  • domain assumption Entropy obeys the area law S = π r_h².
    Sec. V.A, Eq. (47). Load-bearing for first law, Smarr, and heat-engine efficiency.
  • domain assumption The Ashtekar-Magnon-Das mass M = m0/√(1+ℓ) is the correct conserved mass.
    Sec. V.A, Eq. (48). Needed for all thermodynamics; taken from [112,113] and [15].
  • domain assumption The extended-phase pressure is P = −Λ(1+ℓ)/(8π) and ℓ is a thermodynamic variable.
    Sec. V.A, Eq. (49). Needed to define the first law (53) and Smarr relation.
  • domain assumption For static black holes CV = 0, so isochoric paths are adiabatic in heat-engine cycles.
    Sec. V.B. Required for the rectangle-cycle heat-engine calculation.
  • standard math Liouville transformation and the eikonal/WKB limit are valid for the massless scalar equation.
    Secs. II-IV; standard techniques.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical and Thermodynamic Signatures of Lorentz Symmetry Breaking in Bumblebee AdS Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KU3UTDDJ

@misc{pith2026260715827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical and Thermodynamic Signatures of Lorentz Symmetry Breaking in Bumblebee AdS Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KU3UTDDJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15827}
}
abstract

We investigate the impact of spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking on scalar wave propagation, null geodesics, and thermodynamic behavior of four-dimensional asymptotically AdS black holes in bumblebee gravity. The static, spherically symmetric solutions are characterized by a dimensionless parameter $\ell > -1$ arising from the vacuum expectation value of the bumblebee vector field, which globally rescales the radial geometry. Massless scalar fields are analyzed via the radial Klein--Gordon equation cast into a generalized Helmholtz form, yielding an effective frequency-dependent refractive index that identifies oscillatory and evanescent regions, classical turning points, and confinement induced by curvature and Lorentz violation. In the high-frequency limit, wave propagation coincides with null geodesics, with $\ell$ controlling radial scaling and governing the geometric-optics limit. The AdS boundary reflects waves, while the horizon acts as a one-way absorber. Thermodynamic analysis in non-extended and extended phase spaces confirms the first law and Smarr relation, with $\ell$ influencing heat capacity, free energy, and stability. \textcolor{black}{Modeling these black holes as heat engines, we construct explicit cycles and show that efficiency increases with $\ell$, leading to an upper bound imposed by $\eta \leq 1$. Our results provide a framework connecting Lorentz violation, wave propagation, geometric optics, and AdS black hole thermodynamics in bumblebee gravity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15827 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: ), which is constructed from two isobaric paths (1 → 2 and 3 → 4) and two isochoric paths (2 → 3 and 4 → 1). The net work done during this thermodynamic cycle can then be calculated as W = I P dV = W1−→2 + W2−→3 + W3−→4 + W4−→1 = W1−→2 + W3−→4 = P1 (V2 − V1) + P4 (V4 −…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev

    C.M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Relativ. 17, 4 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity (1st ed.) , London, Routledge (2003)

    A. Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity (1st ed.) , London, Routledge (2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    On the other hand, we must to respect the limit ℓ > −1 to avoid of a singularity at ℓ = −1, and imaginary value

    By replacing the relation P = −Λ(1+ℓ) 8π into this condition we find that the inequality ℓ > − 3π ΛS −1. On the other hand, we must to respect the limit ℓ > −1 to avoid of a singularity at ℓ = −1, and imaginary value. Whereas the cosmological constant is negative, so, a common suitable range which satisfy the thermodynamical stable ar ea is ℓ > − 3π ΛS − 1...

    2014

  4. [4]

    Bartelmann, P

    M. Bartelmann, P. Schneider, Weak gravitational lensing , Phys. Rep. 340, 291–472 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    Rovelli, Quantum gravity, Cambridge University Press (2004) 455 pages

    C. Rovelli, Quantum gravity, Cambridge University Press (2004) 455 pages

    2004

  6. [6]

    Rovelli, Loop quantum gravity , Living Rev

    C. Rovelli, Loop quantum gravity , Living Rev. Relativ. 11 5 (2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    Maggiore, A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity, Phys

    M. Maggiore, A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 304 65–69 (1993)

    1993

  8. [8]

    Amelino-Camelia, et al., Tests of quantum gravity from ob- servations of γ-ray bursts , Nature 393, 763–765 (1998)

    G. Amelino-Camelia, et al., Tests of quantum gravity from ob- servations of γ-ray bursts , Nature 393, 763–765 (1998)

    1998

Show all 135 references
  1. [9]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Lorentz invariance and the gravitational field , J. Math. Phys. 2 212–221 (1961)

    1961

  2. [10]

    Magueijo, L

    J. Magueijo, L. Smolin Lorentz invariance with an invariant en- ergy scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 190403 (2002)

    2002

  3. [11]

    Kosteleck` y,Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model, Phys

    V.A. Kosteleck` y,Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69 105009 (2004)

    2004

  4. [12]

    Colladay, V.A

    D. Colladay, V.A. Kosteleck` y,Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 58 116002 (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    Clifton, P.G

    T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, C. Skordis, Modified gravity and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 513 1–189 (2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Carroll, et al., Cosmology of generalized modified gravity models, Phys

    S.M. Carroll, et al., Cosmology of generalized modified gravity models, Phys. Rev. D 71 063513 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Nojiri, S.D

    S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F (R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models , Phys. Rep. 505 59–144 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Eslam Panah, Super-entropy bumblebee AdS black holes , Phys

    B. Eslam Panah, Super-entropy bumblebee AdS black holes , Phys. Lett. B 861 139273 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    Maluf, J.C.S

    R.V. Maluf, J.C.S. Neves, Black holes with a cosmological con- stant in bumblebee gravity , Phys. Rev. D 103 044002 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Casana, A

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F.P. Poulis, E.B. Santos, Ex- act Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity mod el, Phys. Rev. D 97 104001 (2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    S.K. Jha, A. Rahaman, Bumblebee gravity with a Kerr–Sen like solution and its Shadow , Eur. Phys. J. C 81 345 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Ara´ ujo Filho, J.R

    A.A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J.R. Nascimento, A. Yu Petrov, P.J. Porf ´ ırio,Vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee grav- ity, Phys. Rev. D 108 085010 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Ara´ ujo Filho, J.R

    A.A. Ara´ ujo Filho, J.R. Nascimento, A. Yu Petrov, P.J. Porf ´ ırio, An exact stationary axisymmetric vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity , JCAP 2024 004 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    J. Zhu, H. Li, Full classification of static spherical vac- uum solutions to bumblebee gravity with general VEVs , Phys. Lett. B 876 140396 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    J. Zhu, H. Li, New Exact Vacuum Solutions in Extended Bum- blebee Gravity, arXiv:2604.09464 [gr-qc] (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. A. Lessa, R. B. Magalh˜ aes, M.M. Ferreira Jr, Self- consistency of compact objects in Lorentz-violating gravi ty theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D 112 064031 (2025). 11

    2025

  17. [25]

    Colladay and V.A

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, CPT violation and the stan- dard model, Phys. Rev. D 55, 6760 (1997)

    1997

  18. [26]

    Bluhm and V.A

    R. Bluhm and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Spontaneous Lorentz violation, Nambu–Goldstone modes, and gravity , Phys. Rev. D 71, 065008 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    Bluhm, S.-H

    R. Bluhm, S.-H. Fung, and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Spontaneous Lorentz and diffeomorphism violation, massive modes, and gr av- ity, Phys. Rev. D 77, 065020 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Bluhm, V.A

    R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y, and N. Russell, Test- ing CPT with anomalous magnetic moments , Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1432 (1997)

    1997

  21. [29]

    Bluhm, V.A

    R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y, and N. Russell, CPT and Lorentz tests in hydrogen and antihydrogen , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2254 (1999)

    1999

  22. [30]

    Bluhm, V.A

    R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y, and C.D. Lane, CPT and Lorentz tests with muons , Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1098 (2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    Bluhm, V.A

    R. Bluhm, V.A. Kosteleck´ y, C.D. Lane, and N. Russell, Clock- comparison tests of Lorentz and CPT symmetry in space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 090801 (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Carroll, G.B

    S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Limits on a Lorentz- and parity-violating modification of electrodyna mics, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990)

    1990

  25. [33]

    Andrianov, R

    A.A. Andrianov, R. Soldati, and L. Sorbo, Dynamical Lorentz symmetry breaking from a (3+1)-dimensional ax- ion–Wess–Zumino model , Phys. Rev. D 59, 025002 (1998)

    1998

  26. [34]

    Lehnert and R

    R. Lehnert and R. Potting, Vacuum ˇCerenkov radiation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 110402 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    Kaufhold and F.R

    C. Kaufhold and F.R. Klinkhamer, Vacuum Cherenkov radiation and photon triple-splitting in a Lorentz-noninvariant ext ension of quantum electrodynamics , Nucl. Phys. B 734, 1 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Belich, L.D

    H. Belich, L.D. Bernald, P. Gaete, and J.A. Helay¨ el- Neto, The photino sector and a confining potential in a supersymmetric Lorentz-symmetry-violating model , Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2632 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Colladay and V.A

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Cross sections and Lorentz violation, Phys. Lett. B 511, 209 (2001)

    2001

  30. [38]

    Lehnert, Dirac theory within the Standard-Model Extension , J

    R. Lehnert, Dirac theory within the Standard-Model Extension , J. Math. Phys. 45, 3399 (2004)

    2004

  31. [39]

    Altschul, Compton scattering in the presence of Lorentz and CPT violation , Phys

    B. Altschul, Compton scattering in the presence of Lorentz and CPT violation , Phys. Rev. D 70, 056005 (2004)

    2004

  32. [40]

    Shore, Strong equivalence, Lorentz and CPT violation, anti-hydrogen spectroscopy and gamma-ray burst polarimet ry, Nucl

    G.M. Shore, Strong equivalence, Lorentz and CPT violation, anti-hydrogen spectroscopy and gamma-ray burst polarimet ry, Nucl. Phys. B 717, 86 (2005)

    2005

  33. [41]

    Jackiw and V.A

    R. Jackiw and V.A. Kosteleck´ y, Radiatively in- duced Lorentz and CPT violation in electrodynamics , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3572 (1999)

    1999

  34. [42]

    Chung and B.K

    J.M. Chung and B.K. Chung, Induced Lorentz and CPT violat- ing Chern–Simons term in QED: Fock–Schwinger proper time method, Phys. Rev. D 63, 105015 (2001)

    2001

  35. [43]

    Battistel and G

    O.A. Battistel and G. Dallabona, Role of ambiguities and gauge invariance in the calculation of the radia- tively induced Chern–Simons shift in extended QED , Nucl. Phys. B 610, 316 (2001)

    2001

  36. [44]

    A. P. B. Scarpelli, M. Sampaio, M. C. Nemes, and B. Hiller, Chi- ral anomaly and CPT invariance in an implicit momentum space regularization framework, Phys. Rev. D 64, 046013 (2001)

    2001

  37. [45]

    Mariz, et al., A remark on Lorentz violation at finite temper- ature, JHEP 10, 019 (2005)

    T. Mariz, et al., A remark on Lorentz violation at finite temper- ature, JHEP 10, 019 (2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    Nascimento, E

    J.R. Nascimento, E. Passos, A.Yu. Petrov, and F.A. Brito, Lorentz–CPT violation, radiative corrections and finite te mper- ature, JHEP 06, 016 (2007)

    2007

  39. [47]

    Scarpelli, M

    A.P.B. Scarpelli, M. Sampaio, M.C. Nemes, and B. Hiller, Gauge invariance and the CPT and Lorentz violat- ing induced Chern–Simons-like term in extended QED , Eur. Phys. J. C 56, 571 (2008)

    2008

  40. [48]

    Del Cima, J.M

    O.M. Del Cima, J.M. Fonseca, D.H.T. Franco, and O. Piguet, Lorentz and CPT violation in QED revisited: a missing analys is, Phys. Lett. B 688, 258 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    Gazzola, et al., QED with minimal and nonminimal couplings: on the quantum generation of Lorentz-violating terms in the pure photon sector , J

    G. Gazzola, et al., QED with minimal and nonminimal couplings: on the quantum generation of Lorentz-violating terms in the pure photon sector , J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 035002 (2012)

    2012

  42. [50]

    Baˆ eta Scarpelli, QED with chiral nonminimal cou- pling: aspects of the Lorentz-violating quantum correctio ns, J

    A.P. Baˆ eta Scarpelli, QED with chiral nonminimal cou- pling: aspects of the Lorentz-violating quantum correctio ns, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 39, 125001 (2012)

    2012

  43. [51]

    Agostini, et

    B. Agostini, et. al., Consequences of vacuum polarization on electromagnetic waves in a Lorentz-symmetry breaking scen ario, Phys. Lett. B 708, 212 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    L. C. T. Brito, H. G. Fargnoli, and A. P. Baˆ eta Scarpelli, Aspects of quantum corrections in a Lorentz-violating extension of the Abelian Higgs model , Phys. Rev. D 87, 125023 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    Z. Li, A. ¨Ovg¨ un,Finite-distance gravitational deflection of mas- sive particles by a Kerr-like black hole in the bumblebee gra vity model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 024040 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    R. B. Magalh˜ aes, L. A. Lessa, R. Casana, Nonminimal matter sector couplings in Lorentz-violating gravity: Sel f- consistent traversable wormholes and quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. D 113, 124018 (2026)

    2026

  47. [55]

    S. Chen, M. W ang, and J. Jing, Polarization effects in Kerr black hole shadow due to the coupling between photon and bumblebee field, JHEP 07, 054 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    W ang, S

    Z. W ang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Constraint on parameters of a ro- tating black hole in Einstein–bumblebee theory by quasi-pe riodic oscillations, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 528 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Gu, et al., Probing bumblebee gravity with black hole X-ray data, Eur

    J. Gu, et al., Probing bumblebee gravity with black hole X-ray data, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 708 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Uniyal, S

    A. Uniyal, S. Kanzi, and I. Sakallı, Some observable physical properties of the higher dimensional dS/AdS black holes in E in- stein–bumblebee gravity theory , Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 668 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Hassanabadi, et al., Ergosphere Dynamics and Rotational En- ergy Extraction in Bumblebee Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Holes, arXiv:2512.18512 [gr-qc] (2025)

    H. Hassanabadi, et al., Ergosphere Dynamics and Rotational En- ergy Extraction in Bumblebee Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Holes, arXiv:2512.18512 [gr-qc] (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    ¨Ovg¨ un, K

    A. ¨Ovg¨ un, K. Jusufi, and I. Sakallı, Exact traversable wormhole solution in bumblebee gravity , Phys. Rev. D 99, 024042 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    Oliveira, D

    R. Oliveira, D. M. Dantas, V. Santos, and C. A. S. Almeida, Quasinormal modes of bumblebee wormhole , Class. Quantum Grav. 36, 105013 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Kanzi and I

    S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı, GUP modified Hawking radiation in bum- blebee gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 946, 114703 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Kanzi and I

    S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı, Greybody radiation and quasinor- mal modes of Kerr-like black hole in bumblebee gravity model , Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 501 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    Comment on ‘Greybody radia- tion and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumble bee gravity model

    S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı, Reply to “Comment on ‘Greybody radia- tion and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumble bee gravity model”’, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 93 (2022) . 12

    2022

  57. [65]

    Sekhmani, Quasinormal modes of massive scalar perturba- tions in slow-rotation bumblebee black holes with traceles s con- formal electrodynamics, Phys

    Y. Sekhmani, Quasinormal modes of massive scalar perturba- tions in slow-rotation bumblebee black holes with traceles s con- formal electrodynamics, Phys. Dark Universe 52, 102358 (2026)

    2026

  58. [66]

    Mustafa, et al., Epicyclic oscillations around slowly rotating charged black hole in Bumblebee gravity , Phys

    G. Mustafa, et al., Epicyclic oscillations around slowly rotating charged black hole in Bumblebee gravity , Phys. Dark Universe 47, 101753 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    Afrin, S.G

    M. Afrin, S.G. Ghosh, and A. W ang, Testing EGB gravity coupled to bumblebee field and black hole parameter estimation with E HT observations, Phys. Dark Universe 46, 101642 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Ul Islam, S.G

    S. Ul Islam, S.G. Ghosh, and S.D. Maharaj, Investigating Ro- tating Black Holes in Bumblebee Gravity: Insights from EHT Observations, arXiv:2410.05395 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Y. Shi, A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, Effects of bumblebee gravity on neu- trino motion , JCAP 2025, 045 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, Y. Shi, F. S. N . Lobo, The flight of the bumblebee in a non-commutative geometry: a new black hole solution , Ann. Phys. 490, 170487 (2026)

    2026

  63. [71]

    A. A. Ara´ ujo Filho, N. Heidari, I. P. Lobo, V. B. Bez- erra, Gravitational aspects of a new bumblebee black hole , Ann. Phys. 489, 170469 (2026)

    2026

  64. [72]

    Azreg, Y

    M. Azreg, Y. Sekhmani, Exact Taub-NUT-like Black Holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity: their thermodynamics and the rmo- dynamic topology, Nucl. Phys. B 1022, 117257 (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Sekhmani, S

    Y. Sekhmani, S. K. Maurya, J. Rayimbaev, M. Altanji, I. Ibragimov, S. Muminov, Exact static and slowly rotating phan- tom conformal nonlinear-electrodynamic black holes in Bum ble- bee gravity with Lorentz Violation and shadow phenomenolog y, Phys. Dark Universe 50, 102116 (20...

    2025

  66. [74]

    Maluf and J.C.S

    R.V. Maluf and J.C.S. Neves, Bumblebee field as a source of cosmological anisotropies, JCAP 10, 038 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Sarmah and U.D

    P. Sarmah and U.D. Goswami, Anisotropic cosmology in bum- blebee gravity theory , Phys. Dark Universe 49, 102057 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Lessa, J.E.G

    L.A. Lessa, J.E.G. Silva, and C.A.S. Almeida, The bum- blebee field excitations in a cosmological braneworld , Europhys. Lett. 141, 29001 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Neves, Kasner cosmology in bumblebee gravity , Ann

    J.C.S. Neves, Kasner cosmology in bumblebee gravity , Ann. Phys. (NY) 460, 169338 (2023)

    2023

  70. [78]

    X. Zhu, R. Xu, and D. Xu, Bumblebee cosmol- ogy: Tests using distance- and time-redshift probes , Phys. Dark Universe, 50, 102127 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    Campos and C

    L.S. Campos and C. Dappiagg, Ground and thermal states for the Klein-Gordon field on a massless hyperbolic black hole with applications to the anti-Hawking effect, Phys. Rev. D 103, 025021 (2021)

    2021

  72. [80]

    R. P. Bhatt and C. Singha, Scalar tidal response of a rotating BTZ black hole , J. High Energy Phys. 2024, 154 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    Chakrabarti, P

    S.K. Chakrabarti, P. R. Giri, K. S. Gupta, Normal mode analysis for scalar fields in BTZ black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 78, 084009 (2008)

    2008

  74. [82]

    Javed, et al., Massless and massive scalar shell dynamics from rotating BTZ black holes with nonminimally coupled scalar fi elds, Sci

    F. Javed, et al., Massless and massive scalar shell dynamics from rotating BTZ black holes with nonminimally coupled scalar fi elds, Sci. Rep. 15, 23862 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Pourhassan, The Klein-Gordon equation of a ro- tating charged hairy black hole in (2+1) dimensions, J

    B. Pourhassan, The Klein-Gordon equation of a ro- tating charged hairy black hole in (2+1) dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 2015, 1 (2015)

    2015

  76. [84]

    Dappiaggi, H.R.C

    C. Dappiaggi, H.R.C. Ferreira, C.A.R. Herdeiro, Superradi - ance in the BTZ black hole with Robin boundary conditions, Phys. Lett. B 778, 1 (2018)

    2018

  77. [85]

    Fontana, Scalar field instabilities in charged BTZ black holes, Phys

    R.D.B. Fontana, Scalar field instabilities in charged BTZ black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 044039 (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Ahmed and A

    F. Ahmed and A. Bouzenada, Geometric and W ave Optics in a Topologically Charged Perry-Mann Type W ormhole with Discl i- nations, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139704 (2025)

    2025

  79. [87]

    Zhang, D.-J

    H. Zhang, D.-J. Liu, X.-Z. Li, Black holes and grav- itational waves in three-dimensional f(R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 90, 124051 (2014)

    2014

  80. [88]

    Myung and H

    Y.S. Myung and H. W. Lee, Unitarity issue in BTZ black holes, Phys. Lett. B 618, 6 (2005)

    2005

  81. [89]

    Kajuri, Bulk reconstruction in rotating BTZ black hole, Phys

    N. Kajuri, Bulk reconstruction in rotating BTZ black hole, Phys. Rev. D 103, 066019 (2021)

    2021

  82. [90]

    Gurtas Dogan, A

    S. Gurtas Dogan, A. Guvendi, and O. Mustafa, Geometric and wave optics in a BTZ optical metric-based wormhole, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139824 (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    Gurtas Dogan, A

    S. Gurtas Dogan, A. Guvendi, O. Mustafa, Ray and wave optics in an optical wormhole, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139626 (2025)

    2025

  84. [92]

    Gurtas Dogan, A

    S. Gurtas Dogan, A. Guvendi, O. Mustafa, ”Ray geodesics and wave propagation on the Beltrami surface: optics of an optic al wormhole” Eur. Phys. J. C, 85 896 (2025)

    2025

  85. [93]

    Ahmed, A

    F. Ahmed, A. Bouzenada, ”Ray and wave dynam- ics in a static FR W spacetime with conical singularity” Phys. Lett. B, 868 139743 (2025)

    2025

  86. [94]

    Gurtas Dogan, O

    S. Gurtas Dogan, O. Mustafa, A. Guvendi, H. Hassan- abadi, ”Optics in spiral dislocation spacetime: Torsion as a geometric waveguide and frequency-filtering mechanism” Eur. Phys. J. C, 86, 31 (2026)

    2026

  87. [95]

    Konoplya, A

    R.A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: From astrophysics to string theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793–836 (2011)

    2011

  88. [96]

    Ara´ ujo Filho, How does non-metricity affect par- ticle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?, J

    A.A. Ara´ ujo Filho, How does non-metricity affect par- ticle creation and evaporation in bumblebee gravity?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2025, 026 (2025)

    2025

  89. [97]

    Ara´ ujo Filho, et al., Gravitational traces of bumblebee gravity in metric–affine formalism, Class

    A.A. Ara´ ujo Filho, et al., Gravitational traces of bumblebee gravity in metric–affine formalism, Class. Quantum Grav. 41, 055003 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. W ang, J. Jing, Quasinormal modes and late time tails of perturbation fields on a Schwarzschild-like bl ack hole with a global monopole in the Einstein-bumblebee theor y, Sci. China- Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 100411 (2023)

    2023

  91. [99]

    Senjaya, The Kerr–Bumblebee exact massive and mass- less scalar quasibound states and Hawking radiation, Eur

    D. Senjaya, The Kerr–Bumblebee exact massive and mass- less scalar quasibound states and Hawking radiation, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 424 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    Ara´ ujo Filho, Accretion of matter of a new bumbl e- bee black hole, Nucl

    Y.Shi, A.A. Ara´ ujo Filho, Accretion of matter of a new bumbl e- bee black hole, Nucl. Phys. B, 1023, 117327 (2026)

    2026

  93. [101]

    Pendry, D

    J.B. Pendry, D. Schurig, D.R. Smith, ”Controlling electrom ag- netic fields” Science, 312 1780–1782 (2006)

    2006

  94. [102]

    Leonhardt, ”Optical conformal mapping” Science, 312 1777–1780 (2006)

    U. Leonhardt, ”Optical conformal mapping” Science, 312 1777–1780 (2006)

    2006

  95. [103]

    Leonhardt, T.G

    U. Leonhardt, T.G. Philbin, ”Transformation optics and the ge- ometry of light” Prog. Opt., 53 69–152 (2009)

    2009

  96. [104]

    T. Chen, W. Tang, J. Mu, T.J. Cui, ”Microwave metamaterials” Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 531 1800445 (2019) 13

    2019

  97. [105]

    Chen, R.-X

    H. Chen, R.-X. Miao, M. Li, ”Transformation optics that mimics the system outside a Schwarzschild black hole” Opt. Express, 18 15183–15188 (2010)

    2010

  98. [106]

    Dehdashti, H

    S. Dehdashti, H. W ang, Y. Jiang, Z. Xu, H. Chen, ”Review of black hole realization in laboratory base on transformation optics” Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 154 181–193 (2015)

    2015

  99. [107]

    Barcelo, S

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, M. Visser, ”Analogue Gravity” Living Rev. Relativ. 14 3 (2011)

    2011

  100. [108]

    Braunstein, et al., ”Analogue simulations of quantum g ravity with fluids” Nat

    S.L. Braunstein, et al., ”Analogue simulations of quantum g ravity with fluids” Nat. Rev. Phys. 5 612–622 (2023)

    2023

  101. [109]

    Leonhardt, ”A laboratory analogue of the event horizon us ing slow light in an atomic medium” Nature 415 406–409 (2002)

    U. Leonhardt, ”A laboratory analogue of the event horizon us ing slow light in an atomic medium” Nature 415 406–409 (2002)

    2002

  102. [110]

    P. A. Cano, M. David, G. van der Velde, Eikonal quasinormal modes of highly-spinning black holes in higher-curvature g ravity: A window into extremality , Phys. Rev. D 113, 104025 (2026)

    2026

  103. [111]

    Miyachi, R

    T. Miyachi, R. Namba, H. Omiya, N. Oshita, Path to an exact WKB analysis of black hole quasinormal modes , Phys. Rev. D 111, 124045 (2025)

    2025

  104. [112]

    Ashtekar and A

    A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Asymptotically anti-de Sitter space- times, Class. Quantum Grav. 1, L39 (1984)

    1984

  105. [113]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Das, Asymptotically anti- de Sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities , Class. Quantum Grav. 17, L17 (2000)

    2000

  106. [114]

    C. V. Johnson, Holographic heat engines , Class. Quantum Grav. 31, 205002 (2014)

    2014

  107. [115]

    C. V. Johnson, Gauss–Bonnet black holes and holographic heat engines beyond large N , Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 215009 (2016)

    2016

  108. [116]

    C. V. Johnson, Born–Infeld AdS black holes as heat engines , Class. Quantum Grav. 33, 135001 (2016)

    2016

  109. [117]

    Bhamidipati and P

    C. Bhamidipati and P. Kumar Yerra, Heat engines for dilatonic Born–Infeld black holes , Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 534 (2017)

    2017

  110. [118]

    R. A. Hennigar, F. McCarthy, A. Ballon, and R. B. Mann, Holo- graphic heat engines: general considerations and rotating black holes, Class. Quantum Grav. 34, 175005 (2017)

    2017

  111. [119]

    Liu and X.-H

    H. Liu and X.-H. Meng, Effects of dark energy on the efficiency of charged AdS black holes as heat engines , Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 556 (2017)

    2017

  112. [120]

    J.-X. Mo, F. Liang, and G.-Q. Li, Heat engine in the three- dimensional spacetime, J. High Energy Phys. 03, 010 (2017)

    2017

  113. [121]

    Balart and S

    L. Balart and S. Fernando, Non-linear black holes in 2+1 dimen- sions as heat engines , Phys. Lett. B 795, 638 (2019)

    2019

  114. [122]

    M. R. Setare and H. Adami, Polytropic black hole as a heat en- gine, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 47, 133 (2015)

    2015

  115. [123]

    Belhaj, et al., On heat properties of AdS black holes in higher dimensions, J

    A. Belhaj, et al., On heat properties of AdS black holes in higher dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 05, 149 (2015)

    2015

  116. [124]

    H. Xu, Y. Sun, and L. Zhao, Black hole thermo- dynamics and heat engines in conformal gravity , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, 1750151 (2017)

    2017

  117. [125]

    S. H. Hendi, et al., Black holes in massive gravity as heat engines , Phys. Lett. B 781, 40 (2018)

    2018

  118. [126]

    Chakraborty and C

    A. Chakraborty and C. V. Johnson, Benchmarking black hole heat engines, II , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1950006 (2019)

    2019

  119. [127]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Li, and H. Yu, Accelerating AdS black holes as the holographic heat engines in a benchmarking scheme , Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 645 (2018)

    2018

  120. [128]

    Eslam Panah, Effects of energy dependent spacetime on geo- metrical thermodynamics and heat engine of black holes: gra v- ity’s rainbow, Phys

    B. Eslam Panah, Effects of energy dependent spacetime on geo- metrical thermodynamics and heat engine of black holes: gra v- ity’s rainbow, Phys. Lett. B 787, 45 (2018)

    2018

  121. [129]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Li, and H. Yu, Thermodynamics of charged accelerating AdS black holes and holographic heat engines , J. High Energy Phys. 02, 144 (2019)

    2019

  122. [130]

    C. H. Nam, Heat engine efficiency and Joule-Thomson expan- sion of nonlinear charged AdS black hole in massive gravity , Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 53, 30 (2021)

    2021

  123. [131]

    Eslam Panah, Kh

    B. Eslam Panah, Kh. Jafarzade, and S. H. Hendi, Charged 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet-AdS Black Holes: Shadow, Energy Emission, Deflection Angle and Heat Engine , Nucl. Phys. B 961, 115269 (2020)

    2020

  124. [132]

    Eslam Panah, and Kh

    B. Eslam Panah, and Kh. Jafarzade, Thermal stability, P − V criticality and heat engine of charged rotating accelerati ng black holes, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 54, 19 (2022)

    2022

  125. [133]

    S. Guo, Y. L. Huang, K. J. He, and G. P. Li, Hay- ward black hole heat engine efficiency in anti-de Sitter space , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, 2150108 (2021)

    2021

  126. [134]

    Guo and Y.-G

    Y. Guo and Y.-G. Miao, On heat properties of charged AdS black holes in Gauss-Bonnet gravity coupled with nonlinear elect rody- namics, Phys. Lett. B 840, 137884 (2023)

    2023

  127. [135]

    Hamil and B

    B. Hamil and B. C. L¨ utf¨ uo˘ glu,Phantom RN-AdS black holes in noncommutative space, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 313 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.