Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 71 references

Structural Relaxation Enables Millisecond Infrared Photodetection in Selenium Iodine Semiconductors

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Structural aging of selenium–iodine turns a slow glassy photoconductor into a millisecond infrared detector.

desk verdict A potentially interesting empirical result (aged Se-I2 shows ms response) buried under a mechanism claim that is confounded and internally inconsistent. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16054 v1 pith:K7SER7JQ submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Biman Jana This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords selenium-iodideSe-I2infraredphotodetectorstructuralrelaxationpersistentphotoconductivityglassysemiconductorlamellarstructurethermalimaging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the optoelectronic performance of solid selenium–iodine (Se–I2) is governed by its structural phase. Freshly solidified Se–I2 is a metastable glass that traps carriers, yielding slow, persistent photoconductivity. The paper argues that prolonged structural relaxation into an ordered lamellar crystal transforms the material into a practical infrared detector with 4.3 ms response time, 8 kHz modulation capability, and shot-noise-limited detectivities near 10^8 Jones at 1550 nm and 10^11 Jones in the visible. If true, this makes Se–I2 a solution-processable, low-cost infrared imaging platform and identifies structural relaxation as a general lever for engineering carrier transport in selenium-based semiconductors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is structural relaxation: the slow conversion of the metastable glassy Se–I2 network into a more ordered lamellar (partially crystalline) structure. This reduces the density of localized trap states that cause persistent photoconductivity. The fast device combines this relaxed material with a thin (~17 μm) lateral geometry on interdigitated platinum electrodes, which shortens carrier transit distances and gives uniform field; a vertical conductivity probe shows how iodine inhomogeneity degrades transport in thick films.

What would settle it

Fabricate the thin lateral device and test its response immediately after solidification, without months of aging and without extra iodine infusion; if it is already millisecond-fast, the speed-up is due to geometry or iodine content, not structural relaxation. Alternatively, track crystallinity (XRD or Raman) of the actual fast device over time and show that the speed increase tracks the crystallinity increase.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the glass-to-crystal transition, not the selenium–iodine chemistry itself, sets the speed of Se–I2 photodetectors. Immediately after solidification the glassy network shows sluggish transport and persistent photoconductivity; after months of aging under reduced pressure the material orders into lamellae and the same material responds in 4.3 ms and tracks modulation up to 8 kHz. The paper also reports a vertical conductivity gradient in thick films, attributed to iodine loss during solidification, which explains why thick vertical devices are slow and motivates the thin lateral geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes the dramatic speed-up to structural relaxation, but the fast device also differs from the slow one in thickness (17 μm vs 170 μm), electrode geometry (lateral interdigitated vs vertical stack), and iodine history (extra iodine infused during storage), so the improvement could come from any of these.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A cheap, solution-processable material can serve as an infrared detector at telecom (1550 nm) and visible wavelengths without cryogenic cooling.
  • Post-fabrication aging — simply waiting — improves response speed by roughly three orders of magnitude, suggesting storage protocols matter for device performance.
  • The vertical iodine gradient identified in thick films provides a doping lever for optimizing future Se–I2 devices.
  • Demonstrated thermal imaging from 150 °C to 500 °C sources shows the material can form images in practical IR scenarios.
  • The linear power dependence at 1550 nm versus ~0.5 exponent in the visible implies trap-free collection specifically in the infrared regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is truly structural, then thermal annealing or seeding should accelerate crystallization from months to minutes, making the technology practical — a testable extension the paper does not perform.
  • The same glass-relaxation logic may apply to other chalcogenide glasses with persistent photoconductivity, suggesting a broader design rule than Se–I2 alone.
  • The iodine gradient could be engineered into a built-in field (graded doping) to improve carrier collection in vertical architectures, potentially recovering the simpler vertical geometry.
  • The 0.4% photocurrent uniformity across lamellar morphology hints that grain-boundary engineering may not be needed for this material, lowering fabrication constraints.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports that solid-state selenium–iodine (Se-I2) evolves from a metastable glassy phase to an ordered lamellar structure during prolonged aging, and that this structural relaxation dramatically improves carrier transport. The authors present vertical devices showing slow bolometric response and a depth-dependent conductivity gradient, a slow lateral device with persistent photoconductivity, and an aged lateral device with ~17 μm film thickness on 10 μm interdigitated Pt electrodes that exhibits a 4.3 ms rise/fall time under 1550 nm illumination, stable photoresponse up to 8 kHz modulation, detectivities of ~10^8 Jones at 1550 nm and ~10^11 Jones in the visible, and infrared thermal imaging. The central claim is that the speedup is caused by structural ordering, not by changes in device geometry or iodine content.

Significance. If fully validated, the work would establish a solution-processable, low-cost infrared photodetector platform with millisecond response and demonstrate structural relaxation as a general strategy for engineering transport in selenium-based semiconductors. The authors are to be credited for fabricating multiple device architectures, performing long-term (12-month) monitoring, and demonstrating a practical imaging application. However, the manuscript's core causal claim—that aging-induced structural ordering, rather than changes in thickness, electrode geometry, or iodine stoichiometry, causes the performance improvement—is not convincingly isolated. An internal inconsistency between the reported 4.3 ms response time and the claimed flat response up to 8 kHz further undermines the quantitative headline claims. These issues are load-bearing and require additional experiments or careful re-analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.4, §3.5, §11.2] The central mechanism—that structural relaxation, not device geometry, causes the millisecond response—is not established because the slow and fast devices differ in multiple variables simultaneously. The slow vertical device is ~170 μm thick with ITO/Pt contacts; the slow lateral device is a 5 mm × 7 mm film; the fast device is ~17 μm thick on 10 μm interdigitated Pt and was stored with an additional 25 mg I2 for 4 weeks. No control experiment varies aging alone on the same geometry. Fig. S15 compares different devices, not the same device before/after aging. Without such a control, the speedup could be due to reduced thickness, lateral geometry, or iodine concentration.
  2. [Abstract and §3.5 (Fig. 4e,f)] The claim of a 4.3 ms response time is quantitatively inconsistent with the claim of stable operation up to 8 kHz. For a first-order system with τ=4.3 ms, the photocurrent amplitude at 8 kHz would be suppressed by a factor of ~1/(2πfτ) ≈ 1/216, not flat. Either the response time measurement or the 8 kHz bandwidth measurement is misinterpreted, or the two figures refer to different processes. The authors should provide a frequency-response curve and reconcile the time-constant and bandwidth.
  3. [Supplementary Section 2, Fig. S5; §3.5] No structural data are presented for the actual fast device. The only XRD pattern (Fig. S5) is from a solidified film on glass, not from the aged lateral device whose photoresponse is claimed to result from structural relaxation. Dark current trends in Figs. S1–S3 and the self-cited ChemRxiv (ref 13) are used to infer crystallization, but no time-resolved XRD or Raman measurement on the fast device is shown. This leaves the key causal step unverified.
  4. [Fig. S15 caption vs §11.2] The Fig. S15 caption attributes the fast response to 'removing the intercalated iodine and ageing,' whereas the fabrication section (§11.2) describes adding 25 mg I2 for iodine infusion. These statements are contradictory and bear directly on the proposed mechanism; please clarify whether iodine was added or removed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] Detectivities are printed as '108 Jones' and '1011 Jones'; superscripts are missing and should be '10^8 Jones' and '10^11 Jones'.
  2. [§2, §3.4, §3.5] Several typographical inconsistencies: 'transfoms' in §3.5, 'Se–I₂' and 'SenI2' are used interchangeably, and the device area is stated as '1.5 mm×1.5 mm' in §11.2 while §3.5 mentions a different geometry. Please standardize notation.
  3. [§3.5] The text refers to 'Figure 5f' when discussing modulation frequency; this should be Figure 4f. Also, the response time is reported as both '4.32 ms' and '4.3 ms' in the same paragraph; please be consistent.
  4. [Supplementary Sections 1–2] The dark current evolution during crystallization is shown in Figures S1–S3, but these data are not referenced in the main text with explicit discussion of how they support the claimed structural relaxation. Please add cross-references and interpret the magnitude of the change.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Device-speed data are measured, but the glassy-phase/structural-relaxation premise is imported from the authors' own ChemRxiv and then used to explain the speedup.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2 (Introduction), around ref. 13; echoed in Section 3.4]
    "This previous study has also shown that upon cooling, liquid SeI2 forms a glassy phase13 that gradually recovers its crystalline character over time. ... Immediately after solidification from the melt, Se-I2 adopts a metastable glassy structure, as demonstrated by the thermal and structural characterization presented earlier.13"

    The central causal claim is that aging transforms initially glassy Se-I2 into a more ordered structure and that this transformation causes the ~5000x speedup. But the paper presents no time-resolved structural measurement of the actual fast device; the initial glassiness and gradual recovery are asserted on the basis of ref. 13, the authors' own ChemRxiv preprint. The measured 4.3 ms response is then interpreted as evidence of this self-cited structural relaxation, so the explanatory premise is load-bearing self-citation rather than an independently verified structural observation.

full rationale

The headline empirical results — 4.3 ms rise/decay, 8 kHz operation, detectivity values — are measured and are not generated from fitted parameters, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction circularity. The slow- versus fast-device comparison does confound aging with film thickness, lateral geometry, active area, and iodine exposure, but that is an experimental identification or correctness risk, not a definitional reduction to the paper's inputs. The only circularity-adjacent element is the structural-relaxation mechanism: the paper's premise that Se-I2 is initially glassy and gradually crystallizes is taken from the authors' own ChemRxiv (ref. 13), and the same premise is then invoked in §3.4 to attribute the speedup to structural relaxation. No independent time-resolved XRD or Raman data on the actual aged device anchors this step. Because the device-performance measurements themselves are self-contained and externally comparable, this is partial self-citation load-bearing rather than full circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The material is an existing selenium–iodine mixture. The load-bearing assumptions are about phase separation, the glass-to-crystal aging mechanism, the shot-noise-limited detectivity formula, and, most importantly, the causal isolation of aging from device-geometry changes.

free parameters (1)
  • Photocurrent power-law exponent n = n ≈ 1.1 (unaged vertical/lateral), n ≈ 0.5 (aged visible), n ≈ 1.0 (aged 1550 nm)
    The paper fits Ip ∝ P^n for several wavelengths (Figs 1d, 3c, S13) and uses n to infer recombination mechanisms. These fits are not used to produce the central detectivity or response-time numbers, but they are empirical parameters fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Solid Se-I2 consists of phase-separated selenium and iodine crystallites
    Relied on throughout (e.g., Abstract, §3.1, Supp. Sec. 2) and supported by XRD/EDS and refs 11–12. If the active material were a true SeI2 compound, the interpretation of the optoelectronic response would change.
  • domain assumption Prolonged aging under reduced pressure promotes gradual structural relaxation/crystallization of the glassy phase
    Central to the mechanism; supported mainly by ref 13 (same author's ChemRxiv) and by dark-current increases over time (Figs S1–S3). No time-resolved XRD or crystallinity measurement is shown for the actual fast device.
  • domain assumption Detectivity is shot-noise-limited
    The reported D* values are computed with Eq. 9 assuming the noise current is sqrt(2e I_dark). No independent noise measurement or noise-equivalent-power data are provided, so the quoted Jones numbers inherit this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The response-speed improvement is caused by structural ordering, not by changes in device geometry or iodine content
    The fast device differs from the slow device in thickness (17 vs 170 μm), electrode geometry (lateral vs vertical), and iodine infusion. No controlled experiment isolates aging as the causal variable, yet the paper's central conclusion depends on this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural Relaxation Enables Millisecond Infrared Photodetection in Selenium Iodine Semiconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7SER7JQ

@misc{pith2026260716054,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural Relaxation Enables Millisecond Infrared Photodetection in Selenium Iodine Semiconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7SER7JQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16054}
}
read the original abstract

The optoelectronic performance of amorphous and partially crystalline semiconductors is strongly governed by structural disorder, yet establishing direct correlations between structural evolution and carrier transport remains challenging. Here, we show that the solid state optoelectronic response of selenium iodine (SeI2) is dictated by its transformation from a metastable glassy phase into an ordered lamellar structure. Vertically resolved transport measurements reveal pronounced depth-dependent electrical conductivity within thick SeI2 films, arising from compositional and structural inhomogeneity developed during solidification. Immediately after solidification, the glassy SeI2 network exhibits sluggish carrier transport and persistent photoconductivity. Upon prolonged structural relaxation, however, the material undergoes significant transport enhancement, enabling millisecond-scale infrared photodetection with a response time of 4.3 ms, stable operation up to 8 kHz modulation frequency, and shot-noise-limited detectivities of 108 Jones at 1550 nm and 1011 Jones in the visible. Spatial photocurrent mapping demonstrates highly uniform carrier collection despite the self-assembled lamellar morphology, while infrared thermal imaging confirms practical imaging capability over a broad temperature range. These results establish structural relaxation as a powerful strategy for engineering carrier transport in selenium-based semiconductors and position SeI2 as a promising solution-processable platform for infrared photodetection and thermal imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16054 by the authors.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Line scanning of the horizontal device: (a) “Line scan of the horizontal device: a 1550 nm source is used in combination with an objective lens to make a tight spot on the film. For the line scanning of photo response, the device was moved vertically perpendicular to the beam path. The film SEM image is shown in the zoomed image. (b) The current is shown to rise and fall in every ~2 𝜇m distance it travels. Spatially… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abstract: The optoelectronic performance of amorphous and partially crystalline semiconductors is strongly governed by structural disorder, yet establishing direct correlations between structural evolution and carrier transport remains challenging. Here, we show tha t the solid - state optoelectronic response of selenium–iodine (Se-I2) is dictated by its ...

  2. [2]

    Introduction: Infrared photodetectors have been studied for decades due to their wide -ranging applications in telecommunications 1–3, imaging 4–6, sensing, medical diagnostics 7, environmental and safety monitoring8, defense systems, and emerging quantum technologies9. Se-I2, a low melting point semiconductor10, has primarily been explored in its liquid ...

  3. [3]

    IISc” and (b) “SSCU

    Result and Discussion: Structural characterization (Supplementary Section 2) confirms that, unlike the molten eutectic where selenium –iodine compounds have been reported, solid -state Se-I2 consists of distinct selenium and iodine phases, consistent with previous studies. 11,12 Establishing this structural distinction is important because the optoelectro...

  4. [4]

    Conclusion: In summary, we demonstrate that the optoelectronic performance of selenium -iodine (Se-I2) is intrinsically governed by its structural evolution during solidification and subsequent aging. While freshly solidified Se-I2 forms a metastable glassy structure that exhibits sluggish carrier transport and persistent photoconductivity, gradual struct...

  5. [5]

    set up experiments, collected data and wrote the manuscript

    Author Contribution: B.J. set up experiments, collected data and wrote the manuscript

  6. [6]

    acknowledge funding support from Govt

    Acknowledgements: B.J. acknowledge funding support from Govt. of India through Prime Research Fellowship and Research Grant with project code: PM/MHRD-19- 14871.03. B.J. acknowledge Anshu Pandey and Sushobhan Avasthi for insightful discussion. B.J. acknowledge Hridesh Kumar Gupta, for technical assistance I-V measurements and Ankur Bhaumik for thermal ima...

  7. [7]

    Flöry, N. et al. Waveguide-integrated van der Waals heterostructure photodetector at telecom wavelengths with high speed and high responsivity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 118–124 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Ma, P . et al. Fast MoTe2 Waveguide Photodetector with High Sensitivity at Telecommunication Wavelengths. ACS Photonics 5, 1846–1852 (2018)

    2018

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Hu, W. et al. Germanium/perovskite heterostructure for high-performance and broadband photodetector from visible to infrared telecommunication band. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 106 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Wang, Y . et al. Silver telluride colloidal quantum dot infrared photodetectors and image sensors. Nat. Photonics 18, 236–242 (2024)

    2024

  3. [11]

    Hwang, A. et al. Visible and infrared dual-band imaging via Ge/MoS 2 van der Waals heterostructure. Sci. Adv 7, eabj2521 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Guo, J. et al. Type-printable photodetector arrays for multichannel meta-infrared imaging. Nat. Commun. 15, 5193 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Ishigane, G. et al. Label-free mid-infrared photothermal live-cell imaging beyond video rate. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 174 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Liu, M. et al. Uncooled near- to long-wave-infrared polarization-sensitive photodetectors based on MoSe2/PdSe2 van der Waals heterostructures. Nature Communications 16, 2774 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Wang, Y . et al. Mid-infrared single-pixel imaging at the single-photon level. Nat. Commun. 14, 1073 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Voss, L. F . et al. Selenium-iodide: A low melting point eutectic semiconductor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 242103 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    & Milne, J

    Gopal, M. & Milne, J. Spectroscopic Evidence for Selenium Iodides in CS2 Solution: Se3I2, Se2I2, and Sel2. Inorg. Chem vol. 31 https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines (1992)

    1992

  10. [18]

    Intra- and Intermolecular Correlations in Liquid Selenium-Halogen Systems

    Kenji Maruyama, Yukinobu Kawakita, Makoto Yao, Hirohisa Endo & Masakatsu Misawa. Intra- and Intermolecular Correlations in Liquid Selenium-Halogen Systems. J. Physical Soc. Japan 60, 3032–3044 (1991)

    1991

  11. [19]

    Jana, B. et al. SenI2: A Defect-Engineered Flowable Liquid Semiconductor. ChemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.15002567/v1 (2026) doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.15002567/v1

    2026 doi

  12. [20]

    & Drossinos, Y

    Krausmann, E. & Drossinos, Y . A model of silver-iodine reactions in a light water reactor containment sump under severe accident conditions. Journal of Nuclear Materials 264, 113– 121 (1999)

    1999

  13. [21]

    Tsarev, S. et al. Vertically stacked monolithic perovskite colour photodetectors. Nature 642, 592–598 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Yang, T. et al. Van der Waals epitaxial growth and optoelectronics of large-scale WSe2/SnS2 vertical bilayer p-n junctions. Nat. Commun. 8, 1906 (2017)

    1906

  15. [23]

    Li, H. M. et al. Ultimate thin vertical p-n junction composed of two-dimensional layered molybdenum disulfide. Nat. Commun. 6, 6564 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Photogating in Low Dimensional Photodetectors

    Hehai Fang & Weida Hu. Photogating in Low Dimensional Photodetectors. Advanced Science 4, 1700323 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Hu, R. et al. Correlation between grain orientation and carrier concentration of poly-crystalline In2O3 thin film grown by MOCVD. J. Mater. Sci. 50, 1058–1064 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Leshchenko, E. D. & Dubrovskii, V . G. Inhomogeneous dopant distribution in III–V nanowires. Semiconductors 51, 1427–1430 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Kim, Y . S. et al. Thickness-dependent bulk properties and weak antilocalization effect in topological insulator Bi2Se3. Phys. Rev. B 84, 073109 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Jiang, C. S. et al. Imaging hole-density inhomogeneity in arsenic-doped CdTe thin films by scanning capacitance microscopy. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 209, 110468 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Iodine Chemistry and Applications

    Tatsuo Kaiho. Iodine Chemistry and Applications. vol. ISBN:9781118909911 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Julie Euvrard, Yanfa Yan & David B. Mitzi. Electrical doping in halide perovskites. nature reviews materials 6, 531–549 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Point defect engineering in thin-film solar cells

    Ji Sang Park, Sunghyun Kim, Zijuan Xie & Aron Walsh. Point defect engineering in thin-film solar cells. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 194–210 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Gap States in Amorphous Selenium: What Are the Atomic Structures? Phys

    Keiji Tanaka & Tamihiro Gotoh. Gap States in Amorphous Selenium: What Are the Atomic Structures? Phys. Status Solidi B 262, 2400458 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Golden & Vassiliy Lubchenko

    Alexey Lukyanov, Jon C. Golden & Vassiliy Lubchenko. Structural Origin of the Midgap Electronic States and the Urbach Tail in Pnictogen-Chalcogenide Glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 8082– 8097 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    D. V . Lang & R. A. Logan. Large-Lattice-Relaxation Model for Persistent Photoconductivity in Compound Semiconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 635 (1977)

    1977

  27. [35]

    Marshall I. Nathan. Persistent photoconductivity in AlGaAs/GaAs modulation doped layers and field effect transistors: A review. Solid. State. Electron. 29, 167–172 (1986)

    1986

  28. [36]

    Photoelectric Properties of Amorphous Selenium Thin Films Deposited by Thermal Evaporation

    Zhadyra Toreniyaz et al. Photoelectric Properties of Amorphous Selenium Thin Films Deposited by Thermal Evaporation. Chalcogenide Letters 23, (2026)

    2026

  29. [37]

    M., Hou, C., Liu, L

    Liao, Z. M., Hou, C., Liu, L. P . & Yu, D. P . Temperature dependence of photoelectrical properties of single selenium nanowires. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5, 926–929 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Zhang, M. et al. High-Performance Photodiode-Type Photodetectors Based on Polycrystalline Formamidinium Lead Iodide Perovskite Thin Films. Sci. Rep. 8, 11157 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Wei, Y ., Lan, C., Zhou, S. & Li, C. Recent Advances in Photodetectors Based on Two- Dimensional Material/Si Heterojunctions. Applied Sciences 13, 11037 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Cao, F ., Liu, L. & Li, L. Short-wave infrared photodetector. Materials Today 62, 327–349 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    & Sargent, E

    Konstantatos, G. & Sargent, E. H. Nanostructured materials for photon detection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 391–400 (2010)

    2010

  34. [42]

    Huang, W. et al. Enhanced Photodetection Properties of Tellurium@Selenium Roll-to-Roll Nanotube Heterojunctions. Small 15, 1900902 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Zhang, H. et al. Broadband photodetector based on vapor-deposited selenium self-supporting films. Ceram. Int. 48, 27750–27757 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    K., Prakash, R., Kumar, N

    Chaudhary, V ., Pandey, R. K., Prakash, R., Kumar, N. & Singh, A. K. Highly aligned and crystalline poly(3-hexylthiophene) thin films by off-center spin coating for high performance organic field- effect transistors. Synth. Met. 258, 116221 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Noriega, R. et al. A general relationship between disorder, aggregation and charge transport in conjugated polymers. Nat. Mater. 12, 1038–1044 (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Amorphous selenium and its alloys from early xeroradiography to high resolution X-ray image detectors and ultrasensitive imaging tubes

    Safa Kasap et al. Amorphous selenium and its alloys from early xeroradiography to high resolution X-ray image detectors and ultrasensitive imaging tubes. Physica Status Solidi b 246, 1794–1805 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Modeling Dark Current Conduction Mechanisms and Mitigation Techniques in Vertically Stacked Amorphous Selenium-Based Photodetectors

    Le Thanh Triet Ho et al. Modeling Dark Current Conduction Mechanisms and Mitigation Techniques in Vertically Stacked Amorphous Selenium-Based Photodetectors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 3, 3538–3546 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Xu, D. et al. Deciphering photocurrent mechanisms at the nanoscale in van der Waals interfaces for enhanced optoelectronic applications. Sci. Adv 11, 7614 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Yin, J. et al. Selectively enhanced photocurrent generation in twisted bilayer graphene with van Hove singularity. Nat. Commun. 7, (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Thantsha, E.Q.B

    N.M. Thantsha, E.Q.B. Macabebe, F .J. Vorster & E.E. van Dyk. Opto-electronic analysis of silicon solar cells by LBIC investigations and current–voltage characterization. Physica B Condens. Matter 404, 4445–4448 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    Probing Photocurrent Nonuniformities in the Subcells of Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells

    Zhaoning Song et al. Probing Photocurrent Nonuniformities in the Subcells of Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 5114–5120 (2016). Structural Relaxation Enables Millisecond Infrared Photodetection in Selenium–Iodine Semiconductors Biman Ja...

    2016

  44. [52]

    The picture on the left shows the Se-I2 material in liquid state

    Dark Current and Photocurrent Variation upon Crystallization: Figure S1: Dark current variation with crystallization of the material. The picture on the left shows the Se-I2 material in liquid state. The picture on the right shows the material after allowing it to crystallize ...

  45. [53]

    The porous structure of the Se-I2 is obvious from the SEM image (Figure S 4a-b)

    Structural Characterizations: 2.1 SEM Image and Elemental Mapping: Figure S3: (a-b) SEM image of typical film on silicon and (c) and (d) energy dispersive X-ray spectra EDS elemental mapping for selenium and iodine respectively for the area shown in (b). The porous structure o...

  46. [54]

    The mixture was then immediately decanted on the substrate

    Preparing Film of Se-I2 For Vertical Devices: 64 mg of Selenium powder and 200 mg of molecular Iodine was mixed and heated up in a closed argon environment. The mixture was then immediately decanted on the substrate. A Si wafer was placed on top of the liquid to ensure a flat ...

  47. [55]

    Figure S 8: (a) Vertical stack device geometry designed with an extra layer of Ti2 as an electron transport layer

    Vertical Device Response: Figure S7: Comparison of two vertical devices: I-V characteristics of vertical stack device where (a) Ag paste is used directly on top of Se-I2 layer and (b) 150 nm Platinum layer is used before making electrical contact with Ag paste on top of it. Fi...

  48. [56]

    Photodetector device parameters: 5.1. Photocurrent to Dark Current Ratio: The rise in current flowing through a photodetector upon excitation with light is called the photocurrent 𝐼𝑝ℎ𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝐼𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑘 = 𝐼𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡−𝐼𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑘 𝐼𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑘 ………………………………………….……………..………………….(1) Where 𝐼𝑝ℎ𝑜𝑡𝑜 is the photoc...

  49. [57]

    Horizontal Slow Device Characteristics: Figure S9: Photo response of the large area horizontal devices (5 mm × 7 mm) covering the at different power illumination of 1550 nm source as indicated in the Figures (a-h). The background has been subtracted to omit the continuous drif...

  50. [58]

    The power densities are mentioned in legends

    Characterization of the Faster Horizontal Device: 7.1 Thickness of the Device: Figure S11: Tilted SEM image showing the thickness of the film ~17 𝜇m 7.2 I-V Sweeps of Horizontal Device: Figure S12: I-V characteristics of a typical horizontal Se-I2 device with different power o...

  51. [59]

    (a-c) I-V characteristics of a typical horizontal device measured at 300 K, 200 K and 35 K respectively

    Low Temperature Photoresponse and I -V Sweeps at Different Powers: Figure S 16: The temperature dependence of photo response . (a-c) I-V characteristics of a typical horizontal device measured at 300 K, 200 K and 35 K respectively. (d) The dark current and the percentage of ph...

  52. [60]

    The ceramics was open to emission to the parabolic mirror in the place of the letters

    Thermal Imaging Set-up: Figure S17: Imaging using Horizontal photodetector: (a) The set up for imaging of is made with a hot plate covered with aluminum foil and the foil was cut with the letters desired to be imaged. The ceramics was open to emission to the parabolic mirror i...

  53. [61]

    Experimental: 11.1. Synthesis and Basic Characterizations: The material has been made by adding 0.8 mmol (200 mg) iodine (I2) to 0.8 mmol (64 mg) of Selenium (Se) powder in a round bottom flask in inert condition (Argon in Schlenk line ), gently heating it up to 70 oC to liqui...

  54. [62]

    & Zheng, Q

    Liu, Y., Xu, Z. & Zheng, Q. The interlayer shear effect on graphene multilayer resonators. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 59, 1613–1622 (2011)

    2011

  55. [63]

    Wang, W. et al. Measurement of the cleavage energy of graphite. Nat Commun 6, 7853 (2015)

    2015

  56. [64]

    & Luo, J

    Li, J., Li, J. & Luo, J. Superlubricity of Graphite Sliding against Graphene Nanoflake under Ultrahigh Contact Pressure. Advanced Science 5, 1800810 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    I., Ullah, Z., Haider, S

    Sonil, N. I., Ullah, Z., Haider, S. & Ahmad, W. Flexible UV photodetector based on graphite/titanium dioxide through facile transfer of pencil drawn graphite films on desired substrates. Ceramics International 50, 37057–37066 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    & Zhu, Y

    Xu, F., Lu, W. & Zhu, Y. Controlled 3D Buckling of Silicon Nanowires for Stretchable Electronics. ACS Nano 5, 672–678 (2011)

    2011

  59. [67]

    M., Jiang, H., Huang, Y

    Sun, Y., Choi, W. M., Jiang, H., Huang, Y. Y. & Rogers, J. A. Controlled buckling of semiconductor nanoribbons for stretchable electronics. Nature Nanotech 1, 201–207 (2006)

    2006

  60. [68]

    Yao, L. et al. High‐efficiency stretchable organic light‐emitting diodes based on ultra‐ flexible printed embedded metal composite electrodes. InfoMat 5, e12410 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Posar, J. A. et al. Polymer Photodetectors for Printable, Flexible, and Fully Tissue Equivalent X‐Ray Detection with Zero‐Bias Operation and Ultrafast Temporal Responses. Adv Materials Technologies 6, 2001298 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    Kim, H. et al. A Flexible and Wavelength‐Designable Polymer Light‐Emitting Diode Employing Sandwich‐Encapsulation for Wearable Skin Rejuvenation Photomedicine. Adv Materials Inter 8, 2100856 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Kaltenbrunner, M. et al. Ultrathin and lightweight organic solar cells with high flexibility. Nat Commun 3, 770 (2012)

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.