Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 122 references

Low-mass star-forming galaxies are disk-dominated; their light concentration increases with stellar mass and decreases with sSFR, with bulges emerging near log(M*/M_sun) ~ 9.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:07 UTC pith:IH7W45HA

load-bearing objection A useful multi-band morphology catalog for SAGAbg dwarfs with honest systematics, but the quenching conclusion rests on treating 2,805 GALEX upper limits as measurements and needs a censoring check before publication. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16170 v1 pith:IH7W45HA submitted 2026-07-17 astro-ph.GA

Morphologies of SAGAbg low-mass galaxies in Legacy Survey multi-band imaging: dependence on stellar masses, star-formation rates and low-redshift evolution

Joy Bhattacharyya , Guinevere Herron , Yasmeen Asali , Abby Mintz , Mithi A. C. de los Reyes , Yao-Yuan Mao , Annika H.G. Peter This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxieslow-massmorphologiesstar-formingbandsdirectlyevolutiongalaxy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Galaxies can look like smooth balls, flat disks, or lumpy irregulars. This paper studies 6,211 small, star-forming galaxies from the SAGAbg catalog, using images in four colors (g, r, i, z) from the Legacy Survey. The authors run the public STATMORPH code to measure three 'bulge strength' numbers for each galaxy: the Gini index, M20, and concentration. No human eyeballing is involved.

The central pattern: low-mass galaxies that are actively forming stars have flat, disk-like light profiles. As stellar mass rises above roughly 10^9 solar masses and the star-formation rate per mass falls, the light becomes more centrally concentrated, meaning a bulge is growing. The same sequence appears in all four bands, but the bluest g-band light is always the least concentrated. The authors interpret this as young stars spread across the disk. They also place the sample in the Gini–M20 plane, in the region classically occupied by Sb/Sc/irregular galaxies, and show that the centroid of that distribution shifts with mass and star-formation activity but barely changes with redshift below z=0.1.

The paper is honest about limitations: the images are shallow, and the asymmetry and clumpiness measures come out nonphysical, so conclusions are restricted to bulge-strength metrics. Many GALEX far-UV measurements are low-signal upper limits that are included in the sSFR analysis as if they were detections, and the classification boundaries were originally calibrated on massive galaxies. The result is a useful statistical map, not a final theory.

Core claim

The central assertion, stated in the conclusion, is: "We statistically infer that star-forming low-mass galaxies predominantly have disk morphologies with bulges becoming more prominent in quenched systems at higher masses (log(M*/M_sun) ~ 9)." Supporting this are the measured trends that M20 decreases with stellar mass and increases with sSFR across all bands, while the Gini–M20 sequence occupies the Sb/Sc/Ir region and shifts systematically with mass and star-formation activity.

Load-bearing premise

The sSFR–morphology trends treat GALEX NUV measurements with S/N<4 (2,805 of 6,337 galaxies, Sec. 2.3 and Fig. 2) as usable values in binned analyses rather than as censored upper limits. If these upper limits are systematically biased, the M20–sSFR relation interpreted as physical bulge growth could be partly an artifact of including non-detections in the median and bootstrap statistics (Secs. 3.4–3.5).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper measures non-parametric morphologies (Gini, M20, CAS, and Sersic parameters) for 6211 low-mass galaxies from the SAGAbg catalog using Legacy Survey griz imaging processed through STATMORPH. It studies how the morphology measures depend on stellar mass and GALEX NUV-derived sSFR, examines the Gini–M20 sequence, and uses bivariate Gaussian fits and UMAP to characterize the sequence. The central claim is that star-forming low-mass galaxies are predominantly disk-like (Sb/Sc/Ir) and that bulges become more prominent in higher-mass, lower-sSFR systems, especially near log(M*/Msun) ~ 9 and above.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper usefully extends the morphology–star-formation connection from massive galaxies into the dwarf regime, using a large homogeneous sample and public multi-band imaging. The M20–M* trends are internally consistent across bands after the claimed quality cuts and Sazonova corrections, and the authors are appropriately cautious about the unreliable asymmetry and smoothness measurements. The paper also makes good use of established tools (STATMORPH, PHOTUTILS) and public catalogs, which strengthens reproducibility. However, the sSFR-based inference about quenched galaxies rests on treating a large number of GALEX upper limits as detections, and this is currently the main load-bearing weakness.

major comments (3)
  1. [Secs. 3.4–3.5 and Fig. 2] The sSFR–morphology analysis treats all GALEX NUV measurements with S/N<4 (2,805 of 6,337 galaxies; Table 1, Fig. 2) as measured values in the binned medians/bootstrap (Sec. 3.4) and in the bivariate Gaussian centroid fits (Sec. 3.5). The text explicitly says 'including those with upper bounds,' but an upper limit is not a detection. Non-detections are concentrated at high mass and low sSFR, so the M20–sSFR relation and the associated quenching conclusion may be a mass–morphology trend refracted through censored sSFR values rather than independent evidence that quenching builds bulges. Please add a survival/Kaplan-Meier treatment, an imputation under a conservative upper-limit model, or at minimum a sensitivity test restricted to the 3,532 S/N>4 detections for the sSFR panels of Figs. 9 and 12, and clarify what remains of the quenching claim.
  2. [Secs. 2.1, 3.5, 4.1, and 5] The sample is selected from SAGAbg with a magnitude limit and is described as favoring blue/star-forming galaxies (Sec. 2.1), yet the abstract and conclusion infer bulges 'in quenched systems at log(M*/Msun) ~ 9.' Fig. 2 does show a quenched population at high mass, but the catalog is not complete for quenched/red low-mass galaxies, and the binned sSFR analysis in Sec. 3.4 starts at log(sSFR/yr^-1) = -11, the boundary of the quenched regime. Please either restrict the 'quenched' language to the lower-sSFR tail of the star-forming-selected sample or demonstrate that the trend persists with a selection-completeness correction for quenched galaxies.
  3. [Appendix A and Fig. 12] The bivariate Gaussian centroids are obtained by fitting a 2D Gaussian to a Gaussian KDE of the Gini–M20 distribution with bandwidth 0.08, rather than to the observed galaxies directly. The quoted 3-sigma uncertainties from the lmfit covariance therefore do not include the smoothing-bandwidth choice or finite-sample noise. Since the centroid shifts in Fig. 12 are part of the evidence for the bulge-growth interpretation, please either fit the bivariate Gaussian directly to the unbinned data (maximum likelihood) or quote bootstrap uncertainties that propagate the full analysis chain.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.5] The text refers to Fig. 11 for both the four-galaxy gallery and the Gini–M20 scatter plot, but the figure captions indicate the gallery is Fig. 10. Please fix the callouts.
  2. [Sec. 3.4 and Fig. 9] The text defines sSFR bins over -11 < log(sSFR/yr^-1) < -9, while the Fig. 9 axes appear to cover roughly -10.5 to -9.5. Align the text, bin boundaries, and axis ranges.
  3. [Appendix B] The statement that the Sazonova corrections are ~3% does not immediately follow from Eqs. (B3)–(B4). State the representative values of Reff and <S/N> used and whether the -0.5 offset in Eq. (B4) is included in the quoted M20 correction.
  4. [Sec. 2.3 and Eq. (2)] The paper would benefit from stating explicitly how the 0.2 dex mass uncertainty and 0.1 dex SFR uncertainty propagate into the sSFR bins, especially in the bootstrap errors of Figs. 8 and 9.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central morphology–mass/sSFR trends are empirical measurements from independent survey data.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical measurements rather than results derived from their own fitted inputs. Morphological indices are computed by STATMORPH from Legacy Survey cutouts using definitional formulas (Sec. 2.6, Eqs. 5–11), and the trends in M20 and C_CAS with stellar mass and GALEX-derived sSFR (Figs. 8–9) are binned bootstrap medians. The bivariate Gaussian fits in Sec. 3.5 and Appendix A are descriptive summaries of the Gini–M20 distribution, not predictive claims validated against the same fitted output. The Lotz et al. (2008) Sb/Sc/Ir classification is an external empirical scheme, not a self-citation, and the paper does not claim to derive that scheme. The Sazonova et al. (2025) corrections are externally prescribed and are used only to test robustness. Self-citations such as Asali et al. (2025), de los Reyes et al. (2023), and Mintz et al. (2024) provide context or complementary measurements, but none is load-bearing in the sense of making the central inference true by construction. The inclusion of 2,805 GALEX S/N<4 upper limits in sSFR binned and centroid analyses is a data-censoring concern, not circularity: sSFR is an independent input, and the M20–M* trends are unaffected by it. No quoted equation reduces the predicted morphology trends to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central correlations rest on inherited calibrations (Lotz, Sazonova, GALEX SFR prescriptions, Mao et al. mass relation) and hand-tuned image-processing choices, rather than on new postulated physics. The most consequential assumptions are the treatment of GALEX upper limits as detections and the transfer of high-mass morphological calibrations to low-mass dwarfs.

free parameters (3)
  • Moffat PSF FWHM for source detection = sigma = 3 pixels, beta = 2
    Hand-chosen in Sec. 2.5; directly affects segmentation maps and therefore all morphology measurements.
  • Segmentation detection threshold and deblending contrast = 1-sigma above RMS, >=10 pixels, 32 levels, contrast 0.0005
    Tuned via trials on a few hundred galaxy maps (Sec. 2.4-2.5); not objectively validated on simulations.
  • Bivariate Gaussian centroids mu_M20 and mu_Gini = r-band: mu_M20 ~ -1.637, mu_Gini ~ 0.475 (Table 2)
    Descriptive fits used to quantify shifts of the Gini-M20 sequence in Sec. 3.5 and Appendix A; these are fit to the data, not independently predicted.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Lotz et al. (2008) Gini-M20 classification boundaries calibrated on massive galaxies apply to low-mass dwarfs
    Sec. 4.1 explicitly assumes the high-mass empirical scheme holds for the SAGAbg-morph sample; if the boundaries shift at low mass, the Sb/Sc/Ir classification and sequence interpretation change.
  • domain assumption GALEX NUV measurements with S/N<4 can be treated as usable values in sSFR-binned morphology trends
    Sec. 2.3 and Sec. 3.4 include upper limits in the bootstrap/median analysis; this is a censoring assumption that is not statistically modeled.
  • domain assumption Dust attenuation does not significantly bias bulge-strength measures in these dwarfs
    Sec. 4.2 argues dust is negligible using low-metallicity and clumpy-dust evidence; if wrong, the g-band least-concentrated result could be partly an extinction effect.
  • domain assumption Sazonova et al. (2025) symbolic-regression corrections for Gini and M20 are applicable to this Legacy Survey sample
    Appendix B applies these external corrections; the paper argues they cannot explain the M20 trends, but validity of the corrections is not independently validated here.
  • domain assumption Stellar masses from the color-magnitude relation in Eq. (1) are accurate to ~0.2 dex across the sample
    Sec. 2.1 uses masses from Mao et al. (2021); if mass errors are larger or color-dependent, the sharpness of the bulge-transition claim at log M* ~ 9 could be an artifact of smoothing.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29255 in / 10691 out tokens · 94820 ms · 2026-08-01T21:07:39.317439+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The optical morphologies of low-mass galaxies can be used to directly trace their assembly and constrain models of galaxy evolution. We select a sample of 6211 low-mass ($7\lesssim {\rm log}(M_{\ast}/M_{\odot})\lesssim 10$) star-forming galaxies from the SAGAbg catalog that has high-completeness at low-redshifts ($z<0.1$). We obtain their galaxy maps in the $griz$ - bands of the Legacy Surveys and apply STATMORPH to calculate non-parametric morphological measures including the Gini index, $M_{20}$ measure, and CAS parameters. We study how resolution and signal-to-noise affect the morphology measures and find that the bulge strength measurements are the most reliable. The sequence in Gini$-M_{20}$ space is directly linked to the star-forming sequence of galaxies and is dominated by Sb/Sc/Ir morphologies. The $g$-band light distributions are the least concentrated among all the bands. The systematic trends of $M_{20}$ with respect to stellar mass and GALEX NUV-derived specific star formation rate (sSFR) strongly indicate that the galaxies with flatter light profiles are less massive with higher sSFR and vice-versa. We statistically infer that star-forming low-mass galaxies predominantly have disk morphologies with bulges becoming more prominent in quenched systems at higher masses (${\rm log}(M_{\ast}/M_{\odot})\gtrsim 9$).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16170 by Abby Mintz, Annika H.G. Peter, Guinevere Herron, Joy Bhattacharyya, Mithi A. C. de los Reyes, Yao-Yuan Mao, Yasmeen Asali.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The 2D distribution of SAGAbg-morph sample in the spectroscopic redshift–apparent magnitude plane. The main panel shows a Kernel Density Estimate of the galaxy distribution as a function of spectroscopic redshift (zspec) and Legacy Survey r-band magnitude, with contour levels indicating the density. The color scale, from blue to red, represents the median g − r color for the sample binned in the grid. The … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Star-forming sequence (SFS) for the galaxies in the SAGAbg-morph sample. (Left:) Star formation rate derived from GALEX NUV photometry versus stellar mass. The points represent measurements with S/N> 4 whereas the upside-down triangles show the upper limit of the measurements with S/N< 4. The markers are color-coded by the g −r color from SAGAbs catalog, with blue galaxies tracing the star-forming sequence… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Gallery of representative galaxy maps from the SAGAbg-morph sample showing griz band imaging. Each row displays a single galaxy observed in (left to right), with a false-color composite image in the rightmost panel. The segmentation maps in each of the bands are plotted on the galaxy maps as gray regions. The ellipse outlined by the white dashed line in the rightmost column corresponds to the Petrosian rad… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The fractional dispersions of the morphological measures in the griz bands. Each set of points connected by the solid lines correspond to the measures and can be di￾vided into three regions based upon the order-of-magnitudes of the fractional dispersions. The measures are appropriately annotated within their respective regions. The bulge promi￾nence metrics- M20, Gini, CCAS occupying the yellow region bein… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The histograms and the median estimates for the relevant morphological measures of interest in the griz bands are shown in the left and right columns. The estimates are made after imposing a quality based selection (see Sec. 3.2). The error-bars on the median estimates reflect the 16-84th percentiles of the distribution. We find that the different morphologies do not vary significantly across the bands and… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of SAGAbg-morph sample in the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) versus R20/FWHM plane across griz bands. Each panel shows the relationship between logarithmic ⟨S/N⟩ and the parameter R20/FWHM (the ratio of the radius containing 20% of the total flux to the PSF FWHM) for galaxies observed in the respective photometric band. Points are color-coded by apparent magnitude in each band, ranging from brigh… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The mutual information MI between the r-band morphology measure and the respective measures in the giz bands are show using the blue, orange, red colored bar plots. Aside from the radius measurements, the STATMORPH out￾puts tracing the bulge strength- CCAS, S´ersic n and M20 are more robust compared to ACAS and SCAS. We find that the radii measurements in terms of the half-light RS´ersic 1/2 and Petrosian … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Stellar mass dependence of morphological pa￾rameters in the SAGAbg-morph sample after imposing the quality cuts. Median trends of Gini index (top), M20 (cen￾ter ), concentration CCAS (bottom), as a function of stellar mass log(M∗/M⊙) for galaxies in g (blue circles), r (green squares), i (orange triangles), and z (red crosses) bands. The median estimates are evaluated from bootstrap distributions with the … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Images of four representative galaxies with de￾creasing values of Gini and increasing M20 through the top left, top right, bottom left and bottom right panels. The insets in the corners show the position of the galaxies in the Gini − M20 space and we find that the galaxies have progressively less concentrated light profiles, i.e., more disk dominated morphologies. 3.5. Gini-M20 Distribution The joint dist… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Gini − M20 space distributions for the SAGAbg-morph sample. Left: g-band measurements. Right: r-band measurements. Points are color-coded by stellar mass. Dashed lines delineate the empirical division between merger/irregular systems (upper half) and relaxed disk/spheroid galaxies (lower half). The sequence as seen in the dense cluster of points persists across both bands. Their loci in this space corresp… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Shift of the SAGAbg-morph sequence, as parameterized by a 2D Gaussian distribution, in Gini −M20 space across stellar mass, sSFR and redshift. Top row: Best-fit mean M20 (µM20 ) versus M∗ (left), sSFR (center), and zspec (right). Bottom row: Best-fit mean Gini (µGini) versus the same parameters. Blue circles and green squares represent g and r-band measurements respectively, with shaded regions indicating… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Median trends in galaxy properties and redshift split by morphologies measured in r-band. The median values were evaluated through bootstrap resampling in each bin and the shaded regions represent the 3σ confidence interval of this distribution. Galaxies are divided into low and high values of Gini (top row: green and purple) and M20 (bottom row: blue and orange) based on median splits. Left column: sSFR-… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: UMAP embeddings based on the galaxy properties and the gr band morphologies. Each panel shows the same two-dimensional UMAP embedding of galaxies, with points color-coded by different morphological parameters (clockwise from top-right): M20, Petrosian radius Rp, concentration CCAS, and Gini coefficient. The smooth color gradients demonstrate that galaxies occupy a coherent manifold in the UMAP space. Comp… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Distribution of non-parametric morphological indicators- Gini coefficient and M20 for galaxies observed in griz bands. Left: Two-dimensional Gaussian kernel density estimates (KDEs) showing the joint distribution of Gini and M20 values in each photometric band. The dashed-lines represent Eq. 12, 13. Right: Best-fit 2D Gaussian parameters derived from the observed distributions, displaying the mean values … view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Redshift evolution of the corrections on the Gini index and M20 measures that were calculated using the presciption of Sazonova et al. (2025). All the points here satisfy the quality flags outlined in Sec. 3.2 and are color-coded by apparent magnitude in each band. Top row: Corrections on the Gini indices plotted against spectroscopic redshift (zspec). Bottom row: Corrections on M20 (µM20 ) versus spectro… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c , archivePrefix =. 0805.2366 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Computing in Science and Engineering , keywords =

    Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Computing in Science and Engineering , keywords =. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Array programming with NumPy. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 , archivePrefix =. 2006.10256 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    Nature Methods , keywords =

    SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nature Methods , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , archivePrefix =. 1907.10121 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , keywords =. 1996. doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  9. [9]

    2016 , publisher =

    Kyle Barbary , title =. 2016 , publisher =. doi:10.21105/joss.00058 , url =

    doi:10.21105/joss.00058 2016

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/375001 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0303065 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    astropy/photutils: 2.2.0 , month = feb, year = 2025, publisher =

    Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sip. astropy/photutils: 2.2.0 , month = feb, year = 2025, publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14889440 , url =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14889440 2025

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    The Calibration and Data Products of GALEX. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/520512 , archivePrefix =. 0706.0755 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d , archivePrefix =. 1804.08657 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Astronomy and Computing , keywords =

    Data Lab-A community science platform. Astronomy and Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2020.100411 , adsurl =

    arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09644 , year=

    statmorph-lsst: Quantifying and correcting morphological biases in galaxy surveys , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09644 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =

    RMS asymmetry: a robust metric of galaxy shapes in images with varied depth and resolution. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.33232/001c.123524 , archivePrefix =. 2404.05792 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    The SAGA Survey. VI. The Size─Mass Relation for Low-mass Galaxies Across Environments. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae147d , archivePrefix =. 2509.25335 , primaryClass =

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20444 , year=

    SAGAbg III: Environmental Stellar Mass Functions, Self-Quenching, and the Stellar-to-Halo Mass Relation in the Dwarf Galaxy Regime , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20444 , year=

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    SAGAbg. I. A Near-unity Mass-loading Factor in Low-mass Galaxies via Their Low-redshift Evolution in Stellar Mass, Oxygen Abundance, and Star Formation Rate , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  20. [20]

    SAGAbg. II. The Low-mass Star-forming Sequence Evolves Significantly between 0.05 < z < 0.21. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8137 , archivePrefix =. 2409.12221 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    The SAGA Survey. I. Satellite Galaxy Populations around Eight Milky Way Analogs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8626 , archivePrefix =. 1705.06743 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    The SAGA Survey. II. Building a Statistical Sample of Satellite Systems around Milky Way-like Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abce58 , archivePrefix =. 2008.12783 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    The SAGA Survey. III. A Census of 101 Satellite Systems around Milky Way-mass Galaxies , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  24. [24]

    The SAGA Survey. IV. The Star Formation Properties of 101 Satellite Systems around Milky Way-mass Galaxies , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    A Stellar Mass Threshold for Quenching of Field Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/85 , archivePrefix =. 1206.3573 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Comparison of H and UV Star Formation Rates in the Local Volume: Systematic Discrepancies for Dwarf Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/599 , archivePrefix =. 0909.5205 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Star Formation Stochasticity Measured from the Distribution of Burst Indicators. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab04ad , archivePrefix =. 1901.01192 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Tidal Features at 0.05 < z < 0.45 in the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program: Properties and Formation Channels. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f0 , archivePrefix =. 1805.05970 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Star Formation in Isolated Dwarf Galaxies Hosting Tidal Debris: Extending the Dwarf-Dwarf Merger Sequence. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab6ef3 , archivePrefix =. 1911.08497 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Tracing the Intrinsic Shapes of Dwarf Galaxies Out to Four Effective Radii: Clues to Low-mass Stellar Halo Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abacc2 , archivePrefix =. 2007.10349 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    The Intrinsic Shapes of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies (LSBGs): A Discriminant of LSBG Galaxy Formation Mechanisms. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac15f0 , archivePrefix =. 2106.05288 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Surface Brightness and Evolution of Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/182301 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/182301

  33. [33]

    Structural and Photometric Classification of Galaxies. I. Calibration Based on a Nearby Galaxy Sample. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/301386 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0002262 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    PetroFit: A Python Package for Computing Petrosian Radii and Fitting Galaxy Light Profiles. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5908 , archivePrefix =. 2202.13493 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Dwarf Dwarf Interactions Can Both Trigger and Quench Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad18cb , archivePrefix =. 2311.09280 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The morphological mix of dwarf galaxies in the nearby Universe , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    On the Structural Differences between Disk and Dwarf Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/497964 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0509312 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Multi-wavelength morphology and dust emission in low-redshift dwarf galaxies in COSMOS-Web with HST and JWST. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.09085 , archivePrefix =. 2602.09085 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09085

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    The radial extinction profiles of late-type galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20047024 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0407617 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Chemical Abundances of Seven Irregular and Three Tidal Dwarf Galaxies in the M81 Group. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/705/1/723 , archivePrefix =. 0910.3162 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    The Universal Stellar Mass-Stellar Metallicity Relation for Dwarf Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/102 , archivePrefix =. 1310.0814 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    How nucleation and luminosity shape faint dwarf galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz008 , archivePrefix =. 1901.04509 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1901

  43. [44]

    , keywords =

    A mass threshold for galactic gas discs by spin flips. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa470 , archivePrefix =. 1912.08213 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  44. [45]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Rapid bulge assembly in young galaxy disks at Cosmic Dawn. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.25383 , archivePrefix =. 2510.25383 , primaryClass =

    doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.25383

  45. [46]

    , keywords =

    The intrinsic shapes of dwarf irregular galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt123 , archivePrefix =. 1308.6200 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [47]

    , keywords =

    The buildup of galaxies and their spheroids: The contributions of mergers, disc instabilities, and star formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3152 , archivePrefix =. 2207.07139 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [48]

    , keywords =

    Dwarfs in Void Environments (DIVE): The Stellar Kinematics of Void Dwarf Galaxies Using the Keck Cosmic Web Imager. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd189 , archivePrefix =. 2301.03721 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [49]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Disk Formation and the Size-sSFR Relation of Dwarf Galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.26875 , archivePrefix =. 2510.26875 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.26875

  49. [50]

    The Star Formation Histories of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies. III. Characterizing Quenching in Low-mass Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/136 , archivePrefix =. 1503.05195 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [51]

    , keywords =

    The surprising inefficiency of dwarf satellite quenching. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu965 , archivePrefix =. 1402.1498 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    The optical morphologies of galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation: a comparison to Pan-STARRS observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3345 , archivePrefix =. 1809.08239 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [53]

    , keywords =

    Galaxy morphology and star formation in the Illustris Simulation at z = 0. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2078 , archivePrefix =. 1502.07747 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , volume=

    RMS asymmetry: a robust metric of galaxy shapes in images with varied depth and resolution , author=. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  54. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Cosmic reflections I: the structural diversity of simulated and observed low-mass galaxy analogues , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  55. [56]

    Journal of Open Source Software , volume=

    pysersic: A Python package for determining galaxy structural properties via Bayesian inference, accelerated with jax , author=. Journal of Open Source Software , volume=. 2023 , doi=

    2023

  56. [57]

    , keywords =

    A Nonparametric Morphological Analysis of H Emission in Bright Dwarfs Using the Merian Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6861 , archivePrefix =. 2410.01886 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [58]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 , archivePrefix =. 1802.03426 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03426

  58. [59]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , volume=

    Dwarf Galaxies in the TNG50 Field: connecting their Star-formation Rates with their Environments , author=. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , month=. doi:10.33232/001c.137130 , eprint=

    work page doi:10.33232/001c.137130 2025

  59. [60]

    , keywords =

    Morphological classification of galaxies through structural and star formation parameters using machine learning. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf085 , archivePrefix =. 2501.06340 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [61]

    , keywords =

    Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9807187 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [62]

    , keywords =

    Preparing Red-Green-Blue Images from CCD Data. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/382245 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0312483 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.11813 , version =

    LMFIT. doi:10.5281/zenodo.11813 , version =

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.11813

  63. [64]

    , keywords =

    Application of dimensionality reduction and clustering algorithms for the classification of kinematic morphologies of galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244707 , archivePrefix =. 2212.03999 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    , keywords =

    The bulge-disc decomposed evolution of massive galaxies at 1 < z < 3 in CANDELS. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1478 , archivePrefix =. 1405.1736 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [66]

    , keywords =

    Low-redshift Analogs of Cosmic Noon Galaxies as Laboratories for Clumpy Star Formation. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add926 , archivePrefix =. 2507.11492 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    , keywords =

    Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): understanding the wavelength dependence of galaxy structure with bulge-disc decompositions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1176 , archivePrefix =. 1605.04720 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [68]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Environmental Quenching of Low-surface-brightness Galaxies Near Hosts from Large Magellanic Cloud to Milky Way Mass Scales , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , month=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad79fe , eprint=

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad79fe 2024

  68. [69]

    The Open Journal of Astrophysics , volume=

    The evolution of galaxy morphology from redshift z=6 to 3: Mock JWST observations of galaxies in the ASTRID simulation , author=. The Open Journal of Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , month=. doi:10.33232/001c.129991 , eprint=

    doi:10.33232/001c.129991 2025

  69. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Morphology of Galaxies in JWST Fields: Initial Distribution and Evolution of Galaxy Morphology , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2024 , month=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3448 , eprint=

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3448 2024

  70. [71]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Galaxy morphology from z 6 through the lens of JWST , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2024 , month=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346800 , eprint=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346800 2024

  71. [72]

    , keywords =

    DAWN JWST Archive: Morphology from profile fitting of over 340 000 galaxies in major JWST fields: Morphology evolution with redshift and galaxy type. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555504 , archivePrefix =. 2505.21622 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [73]

    , keywords =

    EPOCHS VI: the size and shape evolution of galaxies since z 8 with JWST Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3597 , archivePrefix =. 2309.04377 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [74]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Galaxy morphologies at cosmic noon with JWST: A foundation for exploring gas transport with bars and spiral arms , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2025 , month=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554725 , eprint=

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554725 2025

  74. [75]

    , year = 1926, month = dec, volume =

    Extragalactic nebulae. , year = 1926, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1086/143018 , adsurl =

    doi:10.1086/143018 1926

  75. [76]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Morphological Classification of Galaxies. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.09610 , archivePrefix =. 2502.09610 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.09610

  76. [77]

    , keywords =

    The Evolution of Galaxy Mergers and Morphology at z < 1.2 in the Extended Groth Strip. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/523659 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0602088 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [78]

    , keywords =

    A New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classification. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/421849 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0311352 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [79]

    A New Approach to Galaxy Morphology. I. Analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/373919 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301239 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [80]

    Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina , year = 1963, month = feb, volume =

    Influence of the atmospheric and instrumental dispersion on the brightness distribution in a galaxy. Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina , year = 1963, month = feb, volume =

    1963

  80. [81]

    , keywords =

    A Morphological Study of AGN-host Dwarf Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/add140 , archivePrefix =. 2504.18194 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.