Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 141 references

Power profiles can be turned into a virtual network that reveals machine health without a 'normal' reference curve.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 21:07 UTC pith:JFJCPU3U

load-bearing objection A solid, well-organized survey of IoT for manufacturing, but the 'virtual machine network' case study is a sketch with no data or validation. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.16172 v1 pith:JFJCPU3U submitted 2026-07-17 eess.SY cs.SYstat.AP

The Internet of Things for Smart Manufacturing: A Review

Hui Yang , Soundar Kumara , Satish Bukkapatnam , Fugee Tsung This is my paper
classification eess.SY cs.SYstat.AP
keywords Internet of Manufacturing Thingssmart manufacturingvirtual machine networkmachine signaturesdynamic time warpingcondition monitoringcyber-physical systemscloud computing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that Internet-of-Things sensing in manufacturing has outpaced the analytical methods needed to use it, and offers one new direction: build a 'virtual machine network' in cyberspace from pairwise comparisons of machine signatures. Instead of checking each machine against a pre-defined normal profile, the paper proposes measuring dissimilarity between every pair of power profiles, embedding those pairwise distances into a network, and using the resulting clusters to spot healthy and degraded machines. If correct, condition monitoring becomes a visual, cluster-based task that needs no reference baseline and scales across large numbers of machines.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that pairwise dissimilarity between machine signatures, embedded as a network, represents machine-condition information better than conventional reference-signature comparison. Concretely, treating each machine (or each produced part) as a node and using dynamic time warping to measure profile-to-profile dissimilarity, then embedding nodes so distances preserve the warping matrix, yields a virtual machine network in which nodes with similar conditions group into clusters. The paper states the proposed network approach 'will provide a better representation of information in the data and further offers opportunities for visual analysis of machine conditions,' enabl

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pairwise dissimilarity matrix: for every pair of machine signatures (power profiles in the case study), dynamic time warping computes an optimally aligned morphology distance. A network-embedding step then places each profile as a node so that Euclidean distances between nodes approximate the warping-matrix dissimilarities, with multidimensional scaling or mini-batch stochastic gradient for large-scale IoMT data. Community detection (e.g., label propagation) groups similar machines or parts, and the node coordinates serve as features for condition monitoring and predictive models.

Load-bearing premise

The whole virtual machine network rests on the assumption that power-profile shape, as captured by DTW dissimilarity, actually distinguishes machine conditions well enough that clusters of similar profiles coincide with healthy versus degraded states.

What would settle it

Collect power profiles from machines with independently known conditions (e.g., fresh versus worn tools), compute the DTW dissimilarity matrix, embed it into a network, and check whether the network's clusters separate the known conditions; if profiles from the same condition are not consistently closer to each other than to other conditions, the framework's central claim collapses.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Condition monitoring can proceed without defining a 'normal' reference signature, removing a key practical burden in manufacturing analytics.
  • P2P networks allow part-level clustering, enabling automatic product categorization and detection of process changes in high-volume, low-mix production.
  • M2M networks let engineers see machine communities sharing operational conditions, so a machine drifting toward a 'failure cluster' can trigger workload reassignment and proactive maintenance.
  • The same network construction extends to other machine signatures, such as acoustic emission, cutting force, or vibration profiles, not just power.
  • Parallel and cloud-based mini-batch optimization make the approach potentially tractable for tens of thousands of profiles, unlike cubic-complexity multidimensional scaling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the pairwise-embedding idea recasts condition monitoring as an unsupervised graph-inference problem, so drift detection becomes cluster-membership change—this could be tested on any labeled dataset of machine signatures to see whether known fault states form separable clusters.
  • Editorial inference: if the framework holds, the reference-profile approach and network approach are complementary, not mutually exclusive; one could use network clusters to bootstrap a reference set and then switch to cheaper reference checks online.
  • Editorial inference: a fair test would compare cluster purity (known healthy vs. worn states) against conventional control-chart performance on the same power-profile data, which the paper does not report.
  • Editorial inference: the reliance on DTW dissimilarity implies that warping window constraints and normalization choices materially affect network geometry; those choices are a natural sensitivity-analysis target for future work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is presented as a review of IoT technologies for smart manufacturing, covering IoT sensing, data-link protocols, IoT platforms, manufacturing applications, cybersecurity frameworks, and government policies. In addition to the review material, it proposes a new framework (Section IV) for building a 'virtual machine network' from power profiles collected in discrete-part manufacturing. The proposal consists of (i) computing pairwise dissimilarities between machine signatures using dynamic time warping (DTW), (ii) embedding the resulting dissimilarity matrix into node coordinates via multidimensional scaling (MDS) or stochastic-gradient variants, and (iii) using the resulting network for condition monitoring, product classification, and production planning. The authors claim that the network approach 'will provide a better representation of information in the data and further offers opportunities for visual analysis of machine conditions' (Section IV.A). They also sketch a cloud/parallel computing strategy for large-scale networks, with algorithmic details delegated to reference [114].

Significance. If the virtual machine network claim were empirically substantiated, the framework could be a useful addition to the IoMT analytics toolbox, particularly for high-volume, low-mix discrete manufacturing. The review portions are broad and generally accurate, covering IoT protocols, platforms, applications, cybersecurity, and international policies; these sections will serve as a useful entry point for readers new to the area. The paper also credits prior work appropriately in many places. However, the central contribution — the virtual machine network — is presented with no validation. No case data, quantitative results, baselines, or ground-truth labels are shown. The manuscript itself acknowledges the case study is 'not comprehensive' (Section IV), and the key algorithmic support is delegated to the authors' own previous work [114]. Thus the contribution, as it stands, is a proposal embedded in a review, not a demonstrated method. This gap is significant because the abstract and conclusions present the framework as an established result rather than an open research direction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV, IV.A] The 'case study' contains no actual case data. The section introduces the proposed network approach and asserts that it 'will provide a better representation of information in the data and further offers opportunities for visual analysis of machine conditions' (IV.A), but no quantitative results, baselines, or cluster-health-state correspondence are reported. The acknowledgements state that datasets were shared (Dr. Congbo Li; Dr. Yun Chen and Dr. Shijie Su), so empirical validation was feasible. Without data or a bench-level demonstration, the central claim of the paper is unsupported. This is a load-bearing issue because the abstract and conclusions rely on it.
  2. [Section IV.B, IV.C.1] The framework assumes power profiles are informative signatures and that DTW dissimilarity captures machine condition. The paper itself notes that machine signatures vary due to product, machine type, procedure, and anomalies (IV.B). In a high-mix or even low-mix setting, part-type or process-parameter differences could dominate the DTW dissimilarity, making clusters reflect product type rather than health state. No ground-truth-labeled examples, degradation trajectories, or comparison with reference-signature control charts are provided. A concrete test would be to use the available datasets with known machine states and show that healthy/degraded machines form separable clusters when part type is controlled; this is missing.
  3. [Section IV.C.3] The key scalable algorithm — the mini-batch stochastic network algorithm — is described only by 'See more details in [114]' (Kan, Yang, Kumara, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2018), a self-citation. The manuscript does not specify the objective function, stochastic-gradient update, convergence conditions, or any experimental timing or accuracy results. Consequently, the claimed capability for large-scale IoMT network construction is not verifiable from this manuscript, and the novelty of the framework rests on a reference that is not independently reproduced or benchmarked here. This is a circularity concern because the 'new framework' depends on external prior work for its only algorithmic support.
  4. [Section IV.C.2, Eq. (2) (second occurrence)] The network-modeling objective is standard MDS/SMACOF: minimize the sum of squared differences between node distances and given dissimilarities. The statement that this approach 'greatly reduces the dimensionality of the data and thereby identifies the "best data" to represent the machine's condition' is an interpretive claim, not a proven property. The reduction to Euclidean coordinates is a standard embedding; whether it captures machine condition better than, for example, a feature-based control chart is exactly the question that needs empirical testing. Note also that two equations are labeled (2), which is confusing.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General] There are duplicate equation numbers: both the DTW recurrence (Section IV.C.1) and the MDS objective (Section IV.C.2) are labeled (2). Please renumber.
  2. [Section IV.B] The text refers to 'Fig. 6 (right)' when discussing power profiles, but the relevant figure appears to be Fig. 7 (parts and profiles). Please fix the cross-reference.
  3. [Section VIII] Typo: 'Preidx' should be 'Predix' (also 'Preidx' appears earlier in Table II as 'Predix' — please make consistent).
  4. [Acknowledgements] Typo: 'opeartaions' should be 'operations'.
  5. [Section IV.B] The bullet numbering uses 'ii)' twice for the second and third items. Should be 'ii)' and 'iii)'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Partial circularity: the virtual-machine-network 'framework' is MDS applied to DTW dissimilarities by construction, and the scalable algorithm is delegated to the authors' own [114]; the case study is explicitly preliminary.

specific steps
  1. renaming known result [Section IV.C.2 (network modeling, objective function) and Section IV.A]
    "min ∑(‖𝒔𝑖 − 𝒔𝑗‖ − 𝛿𝑖𝑗); 𝑖<𝑗, 𝑖, 𝑗 ∈ [1, 𝑛] ... This approach represents each power profile as a network node based on the pairwise dissimilarity measures, which greatly reduces the dimensionality of the data and thereby identifies the 'best data' to represent the machine's condition. ... optimizing the locations of network nodes 𝒔𝑖's can be achieved by existing algorithms such as multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) [112]"

    The network-modeling step is the definition of multidimensional scaling, not a new derivation: nodes are placed so Euclidean distances match the input DTW dissimilarities, and the paper names MDS/SMACOF as the solvers. The claimed advantage that the network 'provides a better representation of information in the data' and reveals 'machine conditions' is therefore the objective function restated as a result; no independent validation links the resulting clusters to health states. The 'new framework' is a relabeling of a known algorithm applied to a dissimilarity matrix.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section IV.C.3 (Cloud Computing) and reference [114]]
    "Therefore, Kan et al. [114] proposed to integrate stochastic gradient algorithms with batch learning, i.e., mini-batch stochastic network algorithms, to model virtual machine networks. As opposed to considering one sample at a time, mini-batch stochastic network algorithms handle multiple samples (i.e., a mini-batch) simultaneously in each iteration. See more details in [114]."

    The scalable algorithm that is supposed to make the virtual-machine-network framework practical for large-scale IoMT is not derived or demonstrated here; it is delegated to reference [114], whose authors (Kan, Yang, Kumara) overlap with the present paper. No reproduction, benchmark, or external validation is provided in this text. The framework's central computational component is thus supported by a self-citation rather than by an independent, checkable derivation.

full rationale

This is a review paper with an illustrative case study, and the paper itself says the case study is 'not comprehensive' and the technical steps 'are not meant to be comprehensive or exclusive, but rather serve as initial ideas.' So there is no claimed formal derivation in which a prediction is forced by construction in the usual sense. However, the network-modeling objective (minimize sum of absolute differences between node distances and DTW dissimilarities) is exactly MDS/SMACOF, and the paper's 'better representation of machine conditions' is the MDS objective restated, making the central original contribution a repackaging of a known method. In addition, the only cited support for the mini-batch stochastic network algorithm that provides scalability is the authors' own prior paper [114], so the framework's computational claim is self-citation-dependent. These features warrant a moderate circularity/repackaging score, but not a high one: the survey content, cybersecurity review, and policy discussion are independent and not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on standard DTW/MDS machinery plus domain assumptions about power profiles and network clusters. The main free choices (warping window, embedding dimension, optimization hyperparameters) are unspecified, and the proposed entity (virtual machine network) has no independent empirical support in this paper.

free parameters (3)
  • DTW window constraint r
    Chosen by hand in Eq. (2) of Section IV.C.1; it affects all pairwise alignments and dissimilarities, but no guidance or value is given.
  • Embedding dimension for node coordinates
    The network model in Section IV.C.2 requires choosing the dimension of the node locations s_i; this is not specified.
  • Mini-batch size and learning rate for stochastic gradient algorithm
    Section IV.C.3 defers these details to the authors' prior paper [114]; they are essential hyperparameters for the proposed parallel algorithm but are not stated here.
axioms (4)
  • standard math Dynamic time warping recurrence (Eq. 2, Section IV.C.1) yields an optimal alignment between profiles.
    Standard algorithm, assumed without proof.
  • standard math Multidimensional scaling can embed pairwise dissimilarity matrices so Euclidean distances approximate the dissimilarities (Section IV.C.2).
    Standard MDS/SMACOF result, assumed as background.
  • domain assumption Power profiles are valid machine signatures whose pairwise dissimilarity reflects machine/process condition.
    The entire framework depends on this; introduced in Section IV.B and used throughout Section IV.C.
  • domain assumption Network community structure in the embedded space corresponds to machine health/condition clusters, so network dynamics encode condition changes.
    Section IV.C.4 assumes clusters and link patterns carry diagnostic meaning; no evidence is provided.
invented entities (1)
  • Virtual machine network no independent evidence
    purpose: A proposed representation of machines (or parts) as nodes in a low-dimensional space, with edge distances matching pairwise dissimilarities of power profiles, intended to support condition monitoring, clustering, and scheduling.
    No data, benchmark, or external validation is provided; it is a postulated modeling construct introduced in Section IV.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 35516 in / 10383 out tokens · 91679 ms · 2026-08-01T21:07:33.597624+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The modern manufacturing industry is investing in new technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), big data analytics, cloud computing and cybersecurity to cope with system complexity, increase information visibility, improve production performance, and gain competitive advantages in the global market. These advances are rapidly enabling a new generation of smart manufacturing, i.e., a cyber-physical system tightly integrating manufacturing enterprises in the physical world with virtual enterprises in cyberspace. To a great extent, realizing the full potential of cyber-physical systems depends on the development of new methodologies on the Internet of Manufacturing Things (IoMT) for data-enabled engineering innovations. This paper presents a review of the IoT technologies and systems that are the drivers and foundations of data-driven innovations in smart manufacturing. We discuss the evolution of internet from computer networks to human networks to the latest era of smart and connected networks of manufacturing things (e.g., materials, sensors, equipment, people, products, and supply chain). In addition, we present a new framework that leverages IoMT and cloud computing to develop a virtual machine network. We further extend our review to IoMT cybersecurity issues that are of paramount importance to businesses and operations, as well as IoT and smart manufacturing policies that are laid out by governments around the world for the future of smart factory. Finally, we present the challenges and opportunities arising from IoMT. We hope this work will help catalyze more in-depth investigations and multi-disciplinary research efforts to advance IoMT technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16172 by Fugee Tsung, Hui Yang, Satish Bukkapatnam, Soundar Kumara.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The structure of a manufacturing execution system. ERP MES PCS Work orders (raw materials, quantities, deliver time), process planning …… Production planning and control, machine parameters, operator scheduling …… Customer orders Market analysis Demand forecasting …… Sensor signals, machine conditions, production data, job status, tool wear …… Asset utilization, quality data, labor management, process perf… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the bidirectional data flow between Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, MES, and Process Control Systems (PCS), i.e., top down from ERP to PCS and bottom up from PCS to ERP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows Google trend comparisons of the popularity levels of “cloud manufacturing”, “industrial internet of things”, and “cyber-physical systems” from 07/01/2011 to 08/01/2017. The three terms receive increasing attention over the past six years. In particular, industrial IoT yields the fastest increase over the past three years. In this section, we will present a review of IoT manufacturing applications in … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Map reduce and cloud computing to optimize the virtual machine network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, http://www.bea.gov/industry/gdpbyind_data.htm

    U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis, http://www.bea.gov/industry/gdpbyind_data.htm

  2. [2]

    Smart Manufacturing Leadership Coalition, https://smartmanufacturingcoalition.org/

  3. [3]

    Smart manufacturing,

    A. Kusiak, "Smart manufacturing," Int J Prod Res, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 508-517, 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Telecommunication Development Bureau, International Telecommunication Union(ITU) ICT Facts and Figures 2017, http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx

    2017

  5. [5]

    http://www.idc.com/

    International Data Corp. http://www.idc.com/

  6. [6]

    K. Ashton. That ‘Internet of Things’ Thing, in the Real World, Things Matter More Than Ideas, http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986

  7. [7]

    Statistical analysis and design of RFID systems for monitoring vehicle ingress/egress in warehouse environments,

    J. M. Govardhan, S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, Y. Bhamare, P. K. Rao and V. Rajamani, "Statistical analysis and design of RFID systems for monitoring vehicle ingress/egress in warehouse environments," International Journal of Radio Frequency Identification Technology and Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 123-146, 2007

    2007

  8. [8]

    RFID localization algorithms and applications-a review,

    J. Zhou and J. Shi, "RFID localization algorithms and applications-a review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 695, 2008

    2008

  9. [9]

    Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey,

    L. D. Xu, W. He and S. Li, "Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2233-2243, 2014

    2014

  10. [10]

    C. Ok, S. Lee, P. Mitra and S. Kumara. Distributed energy balanced routing for wireless sensor networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering 57(1), pp. 125-135, 2009

    2009

  11. [11]

    Wireless sensor networks: a survey,

    I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci, "Wireless sensor networks: a survey," Computer Networks, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 393-422, 2002

    2002

  12. [12]

    Structural Health Monitoring Framework Based on Internet of Things: A Survey,

    C. A. Tokognon, B. Gao, G. Y. Tian and Y. Yan, "Structural Health Monitoring Framework Based on Internet of Things: A Survey," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 619-635, 2017

    2017

  13. [13]

    Using multi-temporal remote sensor imagery to detect earthquake-triggered landslides,

    X. Yang and L. Chen, "Using multi-temporal remote sensor imagery to detect earthquake-triggered landslides," International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 487-495, 2010

    2010

  14. [14]

    Passenger Assignment Model Based on Common Route in Congested Transit Networks,

    H. Ren, J. Long, Z. Gao and P. Orenstein, "Passenger Assignment Model Based on Common Route in Congested Transit Networks," Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 1484-1494, 2012

    2012

  15. [15]

    Real-Time Identification of Incipient Surface Morphology Variations in Ultraprecision Machining Process,

    P. Rao, S. Bukkapatnam, O. Beyca, Z. Kong and R. Komanduri, "Real-Time Identification of Incipient Surface Morphology Variations in Ultraprecision Machining Process," Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 021008-021008-11, 2014

    2014

  16. [16]

    Heterogeneous Sensor Data Fusion Approach for Real-time Monitoring in Ultraprecision Machining (UPM) Process Using Non-Parametric Bayesian Clustering and Evidence Theory,

    O. F. Beyca, P. K. Rao, Z. Kong, S. T. S. Bukkapatnam and R. Komanduri, "Heterogeneous Sensor Data Fusion Approach for Real-time Monitoring in Ultraprecision Machining (UPM) Process Using Non-Parametric Bayesian Clustering and Evidence Theory," IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1033-1044, 2016

    2016

  17. [17]

    Mobile Phone Computing and the Internet of Things: A Survey,

    A. Kamilaris and A. Pitsillides, "Mobile Phone Computing and the Internet of Things: A Survey," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 885-898, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis,

    A. Pantelopoulos and N. G. Bourbakis, "A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2010

    2010

  19. [19]

    A Low-Cost, Portable, High- Throughput Wireless Sensor System for Phonocardiography Applications,

    A. Sa-ngasoongsong, J. Kunthong, V. Sarangan, X. Cai and S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, "A Low-Cost, Portable, High- Throughput Wireless Sensor System for Phonocardiography Applications," Sensors, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 10851- 10870, 2012

    2012

  20. [20]

    Wireless home automation networks: A survey of architectures and technologies,

    C. Gomez and J. Paradells, "Wireless home automation networks: A survey of architectures and technologies," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 92-101, 2010

    2010

  21. [21]

    NFC mobile credit card: The next frontier of mobile payment?

    G. W. Tan, K. Ooi, S. Chong and T. Hew, "NFC mobile credit card: The next frontier of mobile payment?" Telematics and Informatics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 292-307, 2014

    2014

  22. [22]

    State of the Art in LP-WAN Solutions for Industrial IoT Services,

    R. Sanchez-Iborra and M. Cano, "State of the Art in LP-WAN Solutions for Industrial IoT Services," Sensors, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 708-721, 2016

    2016

  23. [23]

    Neul, http://www.neul.com/neul/

  24. [24]

    A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT,

    R. S. Sinha, Y. Wei and S. Hwang, "A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT," ICT Express, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14-21, 2017

    2017

  25. [25]

    IPv4 to IPv6: Challenges, solutions, and lessons,

    S. L. Levin and S. Schmidt, "IPv4 to IPv6: Challenges, solutions, and lessons," Telecommunications Policy, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1059-1068, 2014. 30

    2014

  26. [26]

    A novel IPv6 address configuration for a 6LoWPAN-based WBAN,

    X. Wang, H. Chen and D. Le, "A novel IPv6 address configuration for a 6LoWPAN-based WBAN," Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 61, pp. 33-45, 2016

    2016

  27. [27]

    Machine Monitoring System Based on MTConnect Technology,

    B. Edrington, B. Zhao, A. Hansel, M. Mori and M. Fujishima, "Machine Monitoring System Based on MTConnect Technology," Procedia CIRP, vol. 22, pp. 92-97, 2014

    2014

  28. [28]

    MTConnect Enabled Interoperable Monitoring System for Finish Machining Assembly Interfaces of Large-scale Components,

    P. Lei, L. Zheng, C. Li and X. Li, "MTConnect Enabled Interoperable Monitoring System for Finish Machining Assembly Interfaces of Large-scale Components," Procedia CIRP, vol. 56, pp. 378-383, 2016

    2016

  29. [29]

    OSI Reference Model-The ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection,

    H. Zimmermann, "OSI Reference Model-The ISO Model of Architecture for Open Systems Interconnection," Communications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 425-432, 1980

    1980

  30. [30]

    An IoT-enabled Real-time Machine Status Monitoring Approach for Cloud Manufacturing,

    R. Y. Zhong, L. Wang and X. Xu, "An IoT-enabled Real-time Machine Status Monitoring Approach for Cloud Manufacturing," Procedia CIRP, vol. 63, pp. 709-714, 2017

    2017

  31. [31]

    Resource management for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) in cloud computing: A survey,

    S. S. Manvi and G. Krishna Shyam, "Resource management for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) in cloud computing: A survey," Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 41, pp. 424-440, 2014

    2014

  32. [32]

    Multi-cloud Platform-as-a-service Model, Functionalities and Approaches,

    A. J. Ferrer, D. G. Pérez and R. S. González, "Multi-cloud Platform-as-a-service Model, Functionalities and Approaches," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 97, pp. 63-72, 2016

    2016

  33. [33]

    Application placement and backup service in computer clustering in Software as a Service (SaaS) networks,

    A. Amiri, "Application placement and backup service in computer clustering in Software as a Service (SaaS) networks," Computers & Operations Research, vol. 69, pp. 48-55, 2016

    2016

  34. [34]

    Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques,

    S. Jayaram, H. I. Connacher and K. W. Lyons, "Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques," Computer- Aided Design, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 575-584, 1997

    1997

  35. [35]

    Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing,

    A. Y. C. Nee, S. K. Ong, G. Chryssolouris and D. Mourtzis, "Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing," CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 657-679, 2012

    2012

  36. [36]

    Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment,

    J. Lee, H. Kao and S. Yang, "Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment," Procedia CIRP, vol. 16, pp. 3-8, 2014

    2014

  37. [37]

    Big Data Analytics for Physical Internet-based intelligent manufacturing shop floors,

    R. Y. Zhong, C. Xu, C. Chen and G. Q. Huang, "Big Data Analytics for Physical Internet-based intelligent manufacturing shop floors," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2610-2621, 2017

    2017

  38. [38]

    Analysis of sensor signals shows turning on a lathe exhibits low-dimensional chaos,

    S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, A. Lakhtakia and S. R. T. Kumara, "Analysis of sensor signals shows turning on a lathe exhibits low-dimensional chaos," Physical Review E, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2375-2387, 1995

    1995

  39. [39]

    Time series forecasting for nonlinear and non-stationary processes: a review and comparative study,

    C. Cheng, A. Sa-Ngasoongsong, O. Beyca, T. Le, H. Yang, Z. Kong and S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, "Time series forecasting for nonlinear and non-stationary processes: a review and comparative study," IIE Transactions, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 1053-1071, 2015

    2015

  40. [40]

    Smart manufacturing must embrace big data,

    A. Kusiak, "Smart manufacturing must embrace big data," Nature, vol. 544, no. 7648, pp. 23–25, 2017

    2017

  41. [41]

    F. Tao, Q. Qi, A. Liu and A. Kusiak. Data-driven smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2018,

    2018

  42. [42]

    A big data MapReduce framework for fault diagnosis in cloud-based manufacturing,

    A. Kumar, R. Shankar, A. Choudhary and L. S. Thakur, "A big data MapReduce framework for fault diagnosis in cloud-based manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 54, no. 23, pp. 7060-7073, 2016

    2016

  43. [43]

    Massive sensor data management framework in cloud manufacturing based on hadoop,

    Y. Bao, L. Ren, L. Zhang, X. Zhang and Y. Luo, "Massive sensor data management framework in cloud manufacturing based on hadoop," in IEEE 10th International Conference on Industrial Informatics, 2012, pp. 397-401

    2012

  44. [44]

    Manufacturing execution system – a literature review,

    d. U. Saenz, A. Artiba and R. Pellerin, "Manufacturing execution system – a literature review," Production Planning & Control, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 525-539, 2009

    2009

  45. [45]

    Business process-oriented design of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems for small and medium enterprises,

    M. Quiescenti, M. Bruccoleri, U. La Commare, N. L. Diega and G. Perrone, "Business process-oriented design of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems for small and medium enterprises," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 44, no. 18-19, pp. 3797-3811, 2006

    2006

  46. [46]

    Characterization and monitoring of nonlinear dynamics and chaos in manufacturing enterprise systems,

    S. R. T. Kumara and S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, "Characterization and monitoring of nonlinear dynamics and chaos in manufacturing enterprise systems," in Network Science, Nonlinear Science and Infrastructure Systems, T. Friesz, Ed. 2007, pp.99-122

    2007

  47. [47]

    Nonlinear adaptive wavelet analysis of electrocardiogram signals,

    H. Yang, S. T. S. Bukkapatnam and R. Komanduri, "Nonlinear adaptive wavelet analysis of electrocardiogram signals," Physical Review E, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 026214, 2007

    2007

  48. [48]

    Fractal estimation of flank wear in turning,

    S. T. Bukkapatnam, S. R. Kumara and A. Lakhtakia, "Fractal estimation of flank wear in turning," Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 89-94, 2000

    2000

  49. [49]

    Local eigenfunctions-based suboptimal wavelet packet representation of contaminated chaotic signals,

    S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, S. R. Kumara and A. Lakhtakia, "Local eigenfunctions-based suboptimal wavelet packet representation of contaminated chaotic signals," IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 63, pp. 149-160, 1999

    1999

  50. [50]

    Analysis of acoustic emission signals in machining,

    S. T. S. Bukkapatnam, S. Kumara and A. Lakhtakia, "Analysis of acoustic emission signals in machining," ASME Transactions on Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 121, pp. 568-573, 1999. 31

    1999

  51. [51]

    Tonnage Signature Analysis Using the Orthogonal (HAAR) Transforms,

    C. Koh, J. Shi and W. Williams, "Tonnage Signature Analysis Using the Orthogonal (HAAR) Transforms," Transactions of NAMRI/SME, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 229-234, 1995

    1995

  52. [52]

    Feature-Preserving Data Compression of Stamping Tonnage Information Using Wavelets,

    J. Jin and J. Shi, "Feature-Preserving Data Compression of Stamping Tonnage Information Using Wavelets," Technometrics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 327-339, 1999

    1999

  53. [53]

    Diagnostic Feature Extraction from Stamping Tonnage Signals Based on Design of Experiment,

    J. Jin and J. Shi, "Diagnostic Feature Extraction from Stamping Tonnage Signals Based on Design of Experiment," ASME Transactions, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 360-369, 2000

    2000

  54. [54]

    Phase I analysis for monitoring nonlinear profiles in manufacturing processes,

    Y. Ding, L. Zeng and S. Zhou, "Phase I analysis for monitoring nonlinear profiles in manufacturing processes," Journal of Quality Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 199-216, 2006

    2006

  55. [55]

    Neighborhood method and its coupling with the wavelet method for nonlinear signal separation of contaminated chaotic time-series data,

    Bukkapatnam, S., S. Kumara, A. Lakhtakia,and P.Srinivasan, "Neighborhood method and its coupling with the wavelet method for nonlinear signal separation of contaminated chaotic time-series data," Signal Processing, vol. 82, pp. 1351-1374, 2002

    2002

  56. [56]

    Towards prediction of nonlinear and nonstationary evolution of customer preferences using local markov models,

    S. Bukkapatnam, H. Yang and F. Modhavi, "Towards prediction of nonlinear and nonstationary evolution of customer preferences using local markov models," in The Art and Science Behind Successful Product Launches, N. R. Srinivasa Raghavan and John A. Cafeo, Eds. Springer, 2009, pp.271-287

    2009

  57. [57]

    Heterogeneous recurrence monitoring and control of nonlinear stochastic processes,

    H. Yang and Y. Chen, "Heterogeneous recurrence monitoring and control of nonlinear stochastic processes," Chaos, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 013138, 2014

    2014

  58. [58]

    Heterogeneous recurrence representation and quantification of dynamic transitions in continuous nonlinear processes,

    Y. Chen and H. Yang, "Heterogeneous recurrence representation and quantification of dynamic transitions in continuous nonlinear processes," The European Physical Journal B, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 155, 2016

    2016

  59. [59]

    Heterogeneous recurrence analysis of heartbeat dynamics for the identification of sleep apnea events,

    C. Cheng, C. Kan and H. Yang, "Heterogeneous recurrence analysis of heartbeat dynamics for the identification of sleep apnea events," Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 75, pp. 10-18, 2016

    2016

  60. [60]

    Heterogeneous recurrence monitoring of dynamic transients in ultraprecision machining processes,

    C. Kan, C. Cheng and H. Yang, "Heterogeneous recurrence monitoring of dynamic transients in ultraprecision machining processes," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 41, pp. 178-187, 2016

    2016

  61. [61]

    Self-organizing network for group variable selection and predictive modeling,

    G. Liu and H. Yang, "Self-organizing network for group variable selection and predictive modeling," Annals of Operation Research, pp. 1-22, 2017

    2017

  62. [62]

    Multiscale Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Spatial Cardiac Vectorcardiogram (VCG) Signals,

    H. Yang, "Multiscale Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Spatial Cardiac Vectorcardiogram (VCG) Signals," Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 339-347, 2011

    2011

  63. [63]

    Multiscale recurrence analysis of long-term nonlinear and nonstationary time series,

    Y. Chen and H. Yang, "Multiscale recurrence analysis of long-term nonlinear and nonstationary time series," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 978-987, 2012

    2012

  64. [64]

    Local recurrence based performance prediction and prognostics in the nonlinear and nonstationary systems,

    H. Yang, S. T. S. Bukkapatnam and L. G. Barajas, "Local recurrence based performance prediction and prognostics in the nonlinear and nonstationary systems," Pattern Recognit, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1834-1840, 2011

    2011

  65. [65]

    Forecasting the evolution of nonlinear and nonstationary systems using recurrence-based local Gaussian process models,

    S. T. S. Bukkapatnam and C. Cheng, "Forecasting the evolution of nonlinear and nonstationary systems using recurrence-based local Gaussian process models," Physical Review E, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 056206, 2010

    2010

  66. [66]

    Knowledge discovery from observational data for process control using causal bayesian networks,

    J. Li and J. Shi, "Knowledge discovery from observational data for process control using causal bayesian networks," IIE Transactions, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 681-690, 2007

    2007

  67. [67]

    Analysis of interaction structure among multiple functional process variables for process control in semiconductor manufacturing,

    X. Zhang and Q. Huang, "Analysis of interaction structure among multiple functional process variables for process control in semiconductor manufacturing," Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 263-272, 2010

    2010

  68. [68]

    Shi, Stream of Variation Modeling and Analysis for Multistage Manufacturing Processes

    J. Shi, Stream of Variation Modeling and Analysis for Multistage Manufacturing Processes. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006

    2006

  69. [69]

    Quality assured setup planning based on the stream of variation model for multi-stage machining processes,

    J. Liu, J. Shi and S. J. Hu, "Quality assured setup planning based on the stream of variation model for multi-stage machining processes," IIE Transactions, Quality and Reliability Engineering, vol. 41, pp. 323-334, 2009

    2009

  70. [70]

    A quantitative method for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis,

    A. J. J. Braaksma, A. J. Meesters, W. Klingenberg and C. Hicks, "A quantitative method for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis," International Journal of Production Research, vol. 50, no. 23, pp. 6904-6917, 2012

    2012

  71. [71]

    Sensory-Updated Residual Life Distributions for Components With Exponential Degradation Patterns,

    N. Gebraeel, "Sensory-Updated Residual Life Distributions for Components With Exponential Degradation Patterns," Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 382-393, 2006

    2006

  72. [72]

    Degradation modeling for real-time estimation of residual lifetimes in dynamic environments,

    L. Bian, N. Gebraeel and J. P. Kharoufeh, "Degradation modeling for real-time estimation of residual lifetimes in dynamic environments," IIE Transactions, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 471-486, 2015

    2015

  73. [73]

    Continuous flow modelling of multistage assembly line system dynamics,

    H. Yang, S. T. S. Bukkapatnam and L. G. Barajas, "Continuous flow modelling of multistage assembly line system dynamics," International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 401-411, 2013

    2013

  74. [74]

    Optimization via simulation: A review,

    M. C. Fu, "Optimization via simulation: A review," Annals of Operations Research, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 199-247, 1994

    1994

  75. [75]

    CCIoT-CMfg: Cloud Computing and Internet of Things- Based Cloud Manufacturing Service System,

    F. Tao, Y. Cheng, L. D. Xu, L. Zhang and B. H. Li, "CCIoT-CMfg: Cloud Computing and Internet of Things- Based Cloud Manufacturing Service System," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1435-1442, 2014. 32

    2014

  76. [76]

    Internet of Things and Edge Cloud Computing Roadmap for Manufacturing,

    D. Georgakopoulos, P. P. Jayaraman, M. Fazia, M. Villari and R. Ranjan, "Internet of Things and Edge Cloud Computing Roadmap for Manufacturing," IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 66-73, 2016

    2016

  77. [77]

    Development of Advanced Manufacturing Cloud of Things (AMCoT)—A Smart Manufacturing Platform,

    Y. C. Lin, M. H. Hung, H. C. Huang, C. C. Chen, H. C. Yang, Y. S. Hsieh and F. T. Cheng, "Development of Advanced Manufacturing Cloud of Things (AMCoT)—A Smart Manufacturing Platform," IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1809-1816, 2017

    2017

  78. [78]

    Real-time information capturing and integration framework of the internet of manufacturing things,

    Y. Zhang, G. Zhang, J. Wang, S. Sun, S. Si and T. Yang, "Real-time information capturing and integration framework of the internet of manufacturing things," Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 811-822, 2015

    2015

  79. [79]

    Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing,

    L. Monostori, B. Kádár, T. Bauernhansl, S. Kondoh, S. Kumara, G. Reinhart, O. Sauer, G. Schuh, W. Sihn and K. Ueda, "Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing," CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, in print 2016

    2016

  80. [80]

    UML4IoT—A UML-based approach to exploit IoT in cyber-physical manufacturing systems,

    K. Thramboulidis and F. Christoulakis, "UML4IoT—A UML-based approach to exploit IoT in cyber-physical manufacturing systems," Computers in Industry, vol. 82, pp. 259-272, 2016

    2016

Showing first 80 references.