Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 110 references

Multibath Influence Matrices: Universal Scaling from Real-Time Dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A tensor-network method for multi-bath impurity dynamics extracts the two-channel Kondo exponent from real-time quenches and ramps.

desk verdict Solid new multibath SGIM stitching, but the headline 2CK exponent rests on an assumed additive-cutoff subtraction that is plausible yet unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16411 v1 pith:DPTG7PKH submitted 2026-07-17 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Matan Lotem , Michael Sonner , Valentin Link , Alessio Lerose , Dmitry A. Abanin This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords multibathinfluencematricessemigroupmatrixtwo-impurityAndersonmodeltwo-channelKondocriticalpointKibble-Zurekscalingreal-timedynamicstensornetworksquantumimpuritymodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces multibath semigroup influence matrices, a tensor-network method that simulates real-time dynamics of quantum impurity models coupled to multiple independent fermionic baths. Applied to the two-impurity Anderson model, the method resolves the spectral function across the Kondo-to-singlet transition and tracks quench and ramp dynamics to long times. The central results are a relaxation time diverging as τ ∼ |K−K_c|^−2 at the critical interimpurity exchange and a Kibble-Zurek dissipated work scaling as v^{2/3}, both matching the two-channel Kondo universality class. The authors claim these results establish the method as a practical tool for strongly correlated multi-orbital systems.

What carries the argument

The semigroup influence matrix (SGIM) is a single repeated tensor representing a time-translation-invariant environment's entire non-Markovian back-action on an impurity, obtained by infinite-MPS temporal compression. Multiple SGIMs are combined into one dynamical map via an automated 'superfermion stitching' procedure that enforces fermionic anticommutation through parity MPOs; the joint impurity-environment state is further compressed as a spatial matrix product state. The central analytic device is the additive cutoff correction τ^{-1}(K) ≈ τ^{-1}(K;T,χ) − c(T,χ), with c evaluated at K_c, which isolates the genuine zero-temperature relaxation rate from finite-temperature and finite-bond-d

What would settle it

Compute the inverse relaxation time τ^{-1}(K;T,χ) at fixed low temperature while increasing the SGIM bond dimension χ; if the difference τ^{-1}(K;T,χ) − τ^{-1}(K_c;T,χ) does not converge to a K-dependent function independent of χ, the additive-cutoff assumption fails. Independently, an equilibrium or analytic calculation yielding a critical exponent ν ≠ 2 for the two-channel Kondo point would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the nonequilibrium dynamics of the two-impurity Anderson model near its quantum critical point exhibit universal two-channel Kondo scaling, and that these signatures are numerically accessible with the proposed multibath semigroup influence matrix method. Specifically, the quench relaxation time follows τ ∼ |K−K_c|^{-2}, and the dissipated work in a Kibble-Zurek ramp obeys ⟨Wd⟩ ∼ v^{2/3}. Both scalings are read off after a single-parameter collapse in temperature and bond dimension, which extrapolates the finite-cutoff relaxation rates to the zero-temperature line. The paper also reports a possible algebraic critical relaxation ∼ t^{−3/2}, for which no theoretical predi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the paper's 'natural assumption' in Eq. (6) that finite temperature and bond dimension add a single K-independent constant to the inverse relaxation time, so subtracting the rate at the critical point removes all cutoffs; this is not derived, and if the cutoffs combine non-additively or K_c is misidentified, the τ ∼ |K−K_c|^{−2} divergence and the 2CK exponent would be artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The method resolves transient through asymptotic dynamics across a quantum critical point in a four-bath impurity model, a regime previously beyond reach of tensor-network impurity solvers.
  • The temperature/bond-dimension collapse validates an additive correction for cutoffs, so zero-temperature critical exponents can be extracted from finite-χ, finite-T simulations of other impurity models.
  • The observed ν=2 relaxation divergence and v^{2/3} work scaling identify the 2IAM critical point as two-channel Kondo through purely real-time dynamical probes.
  • Because stitching works for arbitrary bath geometries, the framework extends to chains and tree-tensor impurity setups, and to dissipative or Floquet baths.
  • The spectral functions computed across the transition provide a benchmark for non-Fermi-liquid signatures that cold-atom and mesoscopic experiments could test.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the additive-cutoff assumption generalizes, the same collapse prescription could extract zero-temperature scaling in other critical open systems where finite-size/temperature cutoffs mask divergences.
  • The tentative t^{-3/2} critical relaxation, if confirmed by other methods, would constitute a new universal prediction for the 2CK fixed point that field-theoretic calculations have not yet produced.
  • The Kibble-Zurek dissipated-work protocol maps directly onto charge-Kondo circuits, where the v^{2/3} law could be measured in mesoscopic devices, providing an experimental test of both the method and the 2CK universality class.
  • The method's independence from the specific number and arrangement of baths opens the door to real-time multi-orbital DMFT simulations of correlated materials, where each orbital is a bath channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multibath extension of the semigroup influence matrix (SGIM) framework, combining temporal MPS compression of each bath with automated superfermion stitching and spatial MPS compression, and applies it to the two-impurity Anderson model (2IAM) with four fermionic baths. The authors compute spectral functions across the Kondo-to-singlet phase transition, quench relaxation dynamics, and Kibble-Zurek (KZ) ramp statistics. The central claims are that (i) the relaxation time diverges as τ ∼ |K−K_c|^{-2}, matching the two-channel Kondo (2CK) exponent ν=2; (ii) the dissipated work in a KZ ramp obeys ⟨W_d⟩ ∼ v^{2/3}; and (iii) the critical quench decay is tentatively consistent with t^{-3/2}. The methodology is presented as a practical impurity solver for multibath real-time dynamics.

Significance. If the claims hold, the multibath SGIM framework is a significant technical advance: it provides a controlled way to simulate real-time dynamics of quantum impurity models with multiple environments, beyond single-bath influence-matrix solvers. The automated superfermion stitching for fermionic anticommutation across compressed environments, the use of weak symmetries, and the demonstration on a genuinely multibath model (2IAM) are valuable contributions. Reproducing the known 2CK critical exponent and KZ scaling from real-time numerics would be a strong benchmark. However, the headline universal-scaling claims rest heavily on the additive-cutoff correction in Eq. (6), which is assumed rather than derived, and on exponent extractions that lack quantitative error analysis. The method may well be sound, but the paper as written does not yet make the load-bearing part of the case fully convincing.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4, Eq. (6), Fig. 2(d)] The central ν=2 claim rests on the additive-cutoff assumption τ^{-1}(K) ≈ τ^{-1}(K;T,χ) − c(T,χ), called a 'natural assumption' and validated only by the collapse in Fig. 2(d). Collapse is a necessary but not sufficient test: a K-dependent cutoff contribution, or a multiplicative cutoff effect, could also produce approximate collapse over a finite K-window while biasing the apparent exponent near K_c. Furthermore, K_c ≈ 0.91Γ is used without a systematic determination or uncertainty estimate; the exponent ν is highly sensitive to K_c in a power-law fit. Please provide: (i) a derivation or at least an independent check of the additive form, e.g., by comparing χ→∞ and T→0 limits separately; (ii) fits using alternative cutoff parameterizations (multiplicative, K-dependent additive) to show the extracted ν is robust; and (iii) error bars on ν propagated from K_c and fitting-range choices.
  2. [Fig. 2(d), §5] The exponent extraction from the relaxation-time data is not quantitatively presented. The text states τ diverges as |K−K_c|^{-ν} with ν=2, but Fig. 2(d) shows no fit range, no confidence intervals, and no comparison with neighboring exponents. Given that the collapse in Eq. (6) is the only support for the zero-temperature τ(K), the paper should provide a quantitative fitting procedure, including the K-window used and a χ² or similar measure of the power-law quality. Without this, 'we obtain the universal two-channel-Kondo exponent' is an overstatement of the numerical evidence.
  3. [§5, Fig. 2(f)] The t^{-3/2} critical decay is presented as 'consistent with a power law' with the honest caveat that there is no established prediction for this exponent. However, no fit range, error bars, or power-law index estimate are given, and the text does not discuss how the power law is distinguished from a slow exponential or a crossover. Since the abstract and conclusion highlight universal scaling, this tentative claim should either be quantified and clearly labeled as an observation, or removed from the main-text emphasis.
  4. [Appendix B, Eqs. (B1)-(B3)] The KZ derivation assumes an antisymmetric equilibrium curve ⟨S1·S2⟩_eq around K_c and a scaling ansatz Eq. (B2). While these are plausible, the antisymmetry is not demonstrated for the 2IAM, and the final v^{2/3} scaling inherits the reliability of τ(K) from Eq. (6). Please provide a check of the antisymmetry assumption from the computed equilibrium curves, and discuss how a violation would affect the freeze-out-window integration. This is a secondary issue relative to Eq. (6), but it is part of the load-bearing chain for the KZ claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix C, Eq. (C2)] The spin-1 Kondo temperature comparison in Fig. 2(d) relies on an effective bandwidth D̃ that is chosen to match the data. Since D̃ is a free parameter, the agreement with T_K does not provide an independent validation. Please state this explicitly and, if possible, estimate D̃ from the model parameters.
  2. [General] The paper does not state data availability or code availability. Given that the method involves a nontrivial automated stitching procedure and numerical implementation, a repository or pseudocode would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Fig. 2(e) caption] The caption says 'computed up to t=100/Γ but plotted up to 15/Γ to visibly resolve the decay.' It would be useful to show the full range in a supplementary figure, since the asymptotic relaxation is the quantity used to extract τ.
  4. [References] Ref. [99] is cited for the additive-rate assumption in Eq. (6). If that reference provides a derivation or justification, it should be explicitly described in the text; otherwise the 'natural assumption' should be flagged as an approximation in need of validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No constructed circularity: exponents are external 2CK benchmarks, not fitted outputs; Eq. (6) is an acknowledged extrapolation caveat.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the framework is built from a single structural independence assumption (Eq. 1), Trotterized evolution (Eq. 2), temporal SGIM compression from Ref. [70], superfermion stitching, and spatial MPS compression. The physical predictions—τ ~ |K−Kc|^{−2} and W_d ~ v^{2/3}—are not defined in terms of the numerical outputs; they are inputs from the known 2CK universality class (Δ = 1/2) and the numerics are benchmarked against them. Eq. (6), the additive-cutoff correction, is explicitly labeled a 'natural assumption' and is validated only by an internal collapse; choosing c(T,χ) = τ^{−1}(Kc;T,χ) forces τ^{-1}(Kc) = 0 by construction, but the claimed exponent is not extracted from a fit of that enforced zero, and the full-K collapse provides independent shape information. App. B's Kibble-Zurek scaling takes the theoretical divergence and Δ as input rather than deriving them, so comparing W_d to v^{2/3} is a benchmark. The tentative t^{−3/2} decay is honestly flagged as lacking an established prediction, which is the opposite of fitting to a target. Self-citations to Refs. [63,64,70,80,82] are methodological and the central demonstration is externally falsifiable against known 2CK physics; no uniqueness theorem or smuggled ansatz is invoked. The only material caveat is that Eq. (6) could in principle mask a K-dependent cutoff artifact, but that is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. Score 2 reflects minor methodological self-reliance rather than any constructed equivalence.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method rests on the single-bath SGIM construction from prior work and on several modeling choices for the 2IAM. The only parameters tuned to make the numerics agree with the Kondo-temperature curve is the effective bandwidth D̃ in App. C. The correction c(T,χ) in Eq. (6) is taken from the data at Kc and is load-bearing for the claimed divergence. No free parameter was introduced to force the ν=2 or v^{2/3} scalings themselves.

free parameters (2)
  • c(T,χ) additive rate correction = numerically computed τ^{-1}(K_c; T, χ), e.g. at T=0.01Γ, χ=1257
    Chosen from the data at K_c and subtracted from the numerically computed inverse relaxation time to recover the claimed zero-temperature value (Eq. 6). This is load-bearing for the ν=2 divergence.
  • D̃ (effective Kondo bandwidth) = not specified; hand-selected
    In Appendix C, 'selecting an appropriate D̃ yields a good match' for the Kondo-temperature comparison curve in Fig. 2(d). This is a fitted curve used to validate the Kondo regime, not the central critical scaling.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Environments are mutually independent and uncoupled: H = H_imp + Σ_α H_α
    Structural starting point of the multibath framework; each bath couples only to the impurity system. Used throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Each bath is Gaussian, time-translation invariant, and initially thermal, justifying the single-tensor SGIM representation
    The SGIM construction from Ref. [70] assumes time-translation invariance of each environment; the paper relies on this for the compressed representation.
  • ad hoc to paper Finite temperature and bond dimension cutoffs additively shift the inverse relaxation time (Eq. 6)
    Stated as a 'natural assumption' with no derivation. It is the basis for subtracting c(T,χ) and for the collapse in Fig. 2(d). If false, the central exponent claim fails.
  • domain assumption The 2IAM critical point is in the two-channel Kondo universality class with scaling dimension Δ=1/2
    Used to interpret the measured ν=2 and KZ v^{2/3} scalings. This is prior theoretical knowledge, not established by the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper KZ scaling ansatz Eq. (B2) and antisymmetry of the equilibrium curve around K_c
    Needed to derive ⟨W_d⟩ ∼ v^{2/(2−Δ)} in Appendix B. Standard KZ assumptions, but applied here without independent validation.
  • standard math Schrieffer-Wolff mapping and Kondo temperature formula Eq. (C2)
    Used in Appendix C to estimate T_K in the spin-1 Kondo regime; standard Kondo theory.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multibath Influence Matrices: Universal Scaling from Real-Time Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DPTG7PKH

@misc{pith2026260716411,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multibath Influence Matrices: Universal Scaling from Real-Time Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DPTG7PKH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16411}
}
read the original abstract

Diverging timescales are the hallmark of critical dynamics and the bottleneck to their classical and quantum simulation. To tame this, we compress a spacetime tensor network: temporally into semigroup influence matrices and spatially via matrix-product states. Benchmarking on the two-impurity Anderson model with its four fermionic species, we compute spectral functions to map the evolution from a Kondo resonance, across a non-Fermi-liquid quantum critical point, and into a gapped singlet phase. Resolving transient through asymptotic dynamics in sudden quenches and Kibble-Zurek ramps, we obtain the universal two-channel-Kondo exponent. Together, these results establish multibath influence matrices as a practical tool for real-time dynamics in strongly correlated multi-orbital systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16411 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The two-impurity Anderson model with four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Spectral functions for selected [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Scaling regimes as a function of the ramp veloc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [70]

    Sonner, V

    M. Sonner, V. Link, and D. A. Abanin, Semigroup In- fluence Matrices for Nonequilibrium Quantum Impurity Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 170402 (2025)

    2025

  2. [1]

    Nozi` eres and A

    P. Nozi` eres and A. Blandin, Kondo effect in real metals, J. Phys. France41, 193 (1980)

    1980

  3. [2]

    Andrei and C

    N. Andrei and C. Destri, Solution of the Multichannel Kondo Problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 364 (1984)

    1984

  4. [3]

    A. M. Tsvelick, The thermodynamics of multichannel Kondo problem, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.18, 159 (1985)

    1985

  5. [4]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Exact conformal-field- theory results on the multichannel Kondo effect: Single- fermion Green’s function, self-energy, and resistivity, Phys. Rev. B48, 7297 (1993)

    1993

  6. [5]

    Grobis, I

    M. Grobis, I. G. Rau, R. M. Potok, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, The Kondo Effect in Mesoscopic Quantum Dots, inHandbook of Magnetism and Advanced Mag- netic Materials(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007)

    2007

  7. [6]

    J. A. Hertz, Quantum critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. B14, 1165 (1976)

    1976

  8. [7]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

Show all 110 references
  1. [8]

    Ratiani and A

    Z. Ratiani and A. Mitra, Nonequilibrium dynamics of a two-channel Kondo system due to a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. B81, 125110 (2010)

    2010

  2. [9]

    Mitra, Quantum Quench Dynamics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9, 245 (2018)

    A. Mitra, Quantum Quench Dynamics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9, 245 (2018)

    2018

  3. [10]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.9, 1387 (1976)

    1976

  4. [11]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?, Nature317, 505 (1985)

    1985

  5. [12]

    Z. Ma, A. K. Mitchell, and E. Sela, Quantum Work Statistics across a Critical Point: Full Crossover from Sudden Quench to the Adiabatic Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 130402 (2025)

    2025

  6. [13]

    Braun, M

    S. Braun, M. Friesdorf, S. S. Hodgman, M. Schreiber, J. P. Ronzheimer, A. Riera, M. del Rey, I. Bloch, J. Eis- ert, and U. Schneider, Emergence of coherence and the dynamics of quantum phase transitions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 3641 (2015)

    2015

  7. [14]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble-Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg sim- ulator, Nat...

    2019

  8. [15]

    Horowicz, O

    Y. Horowicz, O. Katz, O. Raz, and O. Firstenberg, Crit- ical dynamics and phase transition of a strongly in- teracting warm spin gas, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2106400118 (2021)

    2021

  9. [16]

    L.-N. Wu, J. Nettersheim, J. Feß, A. Schnell, S. Bur- gardt, S. Hiebel, D. Adam, A. Eckardt, and A. Widera, Indication of critical scaling in time during the relax- ation of an open quantum system, Nat Commun15, 1714 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    Zhang, S

    J. Zhang, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, A. Bylinskii, B. Braver- man, F. Huber, J. Amato-Grill, A. Lukin, N. Gemelke, A. Keesling, S.-T. Wang, Y. Meurice, and S.-W. Tsai, Probing quantum floating phases in Rydberg atom ar- rays, Nat Commun16, 712 (2025). 6

    2025

  11. [18]

    Bauer, C

    J. Bauer, C. Salomon, and E. Demler, Realizing a Kondo-Correlated State with Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 215304 (2013)

    2013

  12. [19]

    A. N. Wenz, G. Z¨ urn, S. Murmann, I. Brouzos, T. Lompe, and S. Jochim, From Few to Many: Ob- serving the Formation of a Fermi Sea One Atom at a Time, Science342, 457 (2013)

    2013

  13. [20]

    Riegger, N

    L. Riegger, N. Darkwah Oppong, M. H¨ ofer, D. R. Fer- nandes, I. Bloch, and S. F¨ olling, Localized Magnetic Moments with Tunable Spin Exchange in a Gas of Ul- tracold Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 143601 (2018)

    2018

  14. [21]

    Hewitt, T

    T. Hewitt, T. Bertheas, M. Jain, Y. Nishida, and G. Barontini, Controlling the interactions in a cold atom quantum impurity system, Quantum Sci. Technol.9, 035039 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    R. Zhang, Y. Cheng, P. Zhang, and H. Zhai, Controlling the interaction of ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat Rev Phys2, 213 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    Kondo, Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Al- loys, Progress of Theoretical Physics32, 37 (1964)

    J. Kondo, Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Al- loys, Progress of Theoretical Physics32, 37 (1964)

    1964

  17. [24]

    A. C. Hewson,The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions (Cambridge University Press, 1997)

    1997

  18. [25]

    B. A. Jones and C. M. Varma, Study of two magnetic impurities in a Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 843 (1987)

    1987

  19. [26]

    B. A. Jones, C. M. Varma, and J. W. Wilkins, Low- Temperature Properties of the Two-Impurity Kondo Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 125 (1988)

    1988

  20. [27]

    B. A. Jones and C. M. Varma, Critical point in the solution of the two magnetic impurity problem, Phys. Rev. B40, 324 (1989)

    1989

  21. [28]

    Affleck, A

    I. Affleck, A. W. W. Ludwig, and B. A. Jones, Conformal-field-theory approach to the two-impurity Kondo problem: Comparison with numerical renormalization-group results, Phys. Rev. B52, 9528 (1995)

    1995

  22. [29]

    Zar´ and, C.-H

    G. Zar´ and, C.-H. Chung, P. Simon, and M. Vojta, Quantum Criticality in a Double-Quantum-Dot System, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 166802 (2006)

    2006

  23. [30]

    D. F. Mross and H. Johannesson, Two-impurity An- derson model at quantum criticality, Phys. Rev. B78, 035449 (2008)

    2008

  24. [31]

    E. Sela, A. K. Mitchell, and L. Fritz, Exact Crossover Green Function in the Two-Channel and Two-Impurity Kondo Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 147202 (2011)

    2011

  25. [32]

    A. K. Mitchell, E. Sela, and D. E. Logan, Two-Channel Kondo Physics in Two-Impurity Kondo Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 086405 (2012)

    2012

  26. [33]

    R. M. Potok, I. G. Rau, H. Shtrikman, Y. Oreg, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Observation of the two-channel Kondo effect, Nature446, 167 (2007)

    2007

  27. [34]

    N. Roch, S. Florens, T. A. Costi, W. Wernsdorfer, and F. Balestro, Observation of the Underscreened Kondo Effect in a Molecular Transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 197202 (2009)

    2009

  28. [35]

    A. J. Keller, L. Peeters, C. P. Moca, I. Weymann, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, G. Zar´ and, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Universal Fermi liquid crossover and quantum criticality in a mesoscopic system, Nature526, 237 (2015)

    2015

  29. [36]

    Iftikhar, S

    Z. Iftikhar, S. Jezouin, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, and F. Pierre, Two-channel Kondo effect and renormalization flow with macroscopic quantum charge states, Nature526, 233 (2015)

    2015

  30. [37]

    Iftikhar, A

    Z. Iftikhar, A. Anthore, A. K. Mitchell, F. D. Parmen- tier, U. Gennser, A. Ouerghi, A. Cavanna, C. Mora, P. Simon, and F. Pierre, Tunable quantum criticality and super-ballistic transport in a “charge” Kondo cir- cuit, Science360, 1315 (2018)

    2018

  31. [38]

    Pouse, L

    W. Pouse, L. Peeters, C. L. Hsueh, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, M. A. Kastner, A. K. Mitchell, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Quantum simulation of an ex- otic quantum critical point in a two-site charge Kondo circuit, Nat. Phys.19, 492 (2023)

    2023

  32. [39]

    Piquard, P

    C. Piquard, P. Glidic, C. Han, A. Aassime, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Meir, E. Sela, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Observing the universal screening of a Kondo impurity, Nat Commun14, 7263 (2023)

    2023

  33. [40]

    Saira, Y

    O.-P. Saira, Y. Yoon, T. Tanttu, M. M¨ ott¨ onen, D. V. Averin, and J. P. Pekola, Test of the Jarzynski and Crooks Fluctuation Relations in an Electronic System, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 180601 (2012)

    2012

  34. [41]

    Hofmann, V

    A. Hofmann, V. F. Maisi, C. R¨ ossler, J. Basset, T. Kr¨ ahenmann, P. M¨ arki, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, C. Reichl, and W. Wegscheider, Equilibrium free energy measure- ment of a confined electron driven out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B93, 035425 (2016)

    2016

  35. [42]

    Hofmann, V

    A. Hofmann, V. F. Maisi, J. Basset, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and C. Jarzynski, Heat dissipation and fluctuations in a driven quantum dot, physica status solidi (b)254, 1600546 (2017)

    2017

  36. [43]

    Barker, M

    D. Barker, M. Scandi, S. Lehmann, C. Thelander, K. A. Dick, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and V. F. Maisi, Experimen- tal Verification of the Work Fluctuation-Dissipation Re- lation for Information-to-Work Conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 040602 (2022)

    2022

  37. [44]

    C. Han, N. Katz, and E. Sela, Measuring work in quan- tum many-body systems using a dynamical work agent, Phys. Rev. B112, 035416 (2025)

    2025

  38. [45]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly corre- lated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimen- sions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  39. [46]

    H. Aoki, N. Tsuji, M. Eckstein, M. Kollar, T. Oka, and P. Werner, Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory and its applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 779 (2014)

    2014

  40. [47]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 865 (2006)

    2006

  41. [48]

    Eidelstein, E

    E. Eidelstein, E. Gull, and G. Cohen, Multiorbital Quantum Impurity Solver for General Interactions and Hybridizations, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 206405 (2020)

    2020

  42. [49]

    Erpenbeck, T

    A. Erpenbeck, T. Blommel, L. Zhang, W.-T. Lin, G. Co- hen, and E. Gull, Steady-state properties of multi- orbital systems using quantum Monte Carlo, J. Chem. Phys.161, 094104 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    Bauernfeind, M

    D. Bauernfeind, M. Zingl, R. Triebl, M. Aichhorn, and H. G. Evertz, Fork Tensor-Product States: Efficient Multiorbital Real-Time DMFT Solver, Phys. Rev. X7, 031013 (2017)

    2017

  44. [51]

    X. Cao, Y. Lu, P. Hansmann, and M. W. Haverkort, Tree tensor-network real-time multiorbital impurity solver: Spin-orbit coupling and correlation functions in Sr2RuO4, Phys. Rev. B104, 115119 (2021)

    2021

  45. [52]

    G. E. Fux, D. Kilda, B. W. Lovett, and J. Keeling, Ten- sor network simulation of chains of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033078 (2023). 7

    2023

  46. [53]

    Z. Sun, R. Chen, Z. Li, and C. Guo, Scalable tensor net- work algorithm for quantum impurity problems, Phys. Rev. B112, 155115 (2025)

    2025

  47. [54]

    F. A. Wolf, A. Go, I. P. McCulloch, A. J. Millis, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Imaginary-Time Matrix Product State Impurity Solver for Dynamical Mean-Field The- ory, Phys. Rev. X5, 041032 (2015)

    2015

  48. [55]

    K. M. Stadler, Z. P. Yin, J. von Delft, G. Kotliar, and A. Weichselbaum, Dynamical Mean-Field Theory Plus Numerical Renormalization-Group Study of Spin- Orbital Separation in a Three-Band Hund Metal, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 136401 (2015)

    2015

  49. [56]

    K. M. Stadler, A. K. Mitchell, J. von Delft, and A. Weichselbaum, Interleaved numerical renormaliza- tion group as an efficient multiband impurity solver, Phys. Rev. B93, 235101 (2016)

    2016

  50. [57]

    Grundner, P

    M. Grundner, P. Westhoff, F. B. Kugler, O. Parcollet, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Complex time evolution in tensor networks and time-dependent Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B109, 155124 (2024)

    2024

  51. [58]

    F. B. Kugler, M. Zingl, H. U. R. Strand, S.-S. B. Lee, J. von Delft, and A. Georges, Strongly Correlated Mate- rials from a Numerical Renormalization Group Perspec- tive: How the Fermi-Liquid State of Sr 2RuO4 Emerges, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 016401 (2020)

    2020

  52. [59]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon, The Theory of a Gen- eral Quantum System Interacting with a Linear Dissi- pative System, Annals of Physics281, 547 (2000)

    2000

  53. [60]

    Strathearn, P

    A. Strathearn, P. Kirton, D. Kilda, J. Keeling, and B. W. Lovett, Efficient non-Markovian quantum dynam- ics using time-evolving matrix product operators, Nat Commun9, 3322 (2018)

    2018

  54. [61]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr ´ ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Non-Markovian quantum processes: Complete framework and efficient character- ization, Phys. Rev. A97, 012127 (2018)

    2018

  55. [62]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Influence Ma- trix Approach to Many-Body Floquet Dynamics, Phys. Rev. X11, 021040 (2021)

    2021

  56. [63]

    Thoenniss, A

    J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Nonequilib- rium quantum impurity problems via matrix-product states in the temporal domain, Phys. Rev. B107, 195101 (2023)

    2023

  57. [64]

    Thoenniss, M

    J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Efficient method for quantum impurity problems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B107, L201115 (2023)

    2023

  58. [65]

    N. Ng, G. Park, A. J. Millis, G. K.-L. Chan, and D. R. Reichman, Real-time evolution of Anderson impurity models via tensor network influence functionals, Phys. Rev. B107, 125103 (2023)

    2023

  59. [66]

    R. Chen, X. Xu, and C. Guo, Grassmann time-evolving matrix product operators for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B109, 045140 (2024)

    2024

  60. [67]

    G. Park, N. Ng, D. R. Reichman, and G. K.-L. Chan, Tensor network influence functionals in the continuous- time limit: Connections to quantum embedding, bath discretization, and higher-order time propagation, Phys. Rev. B110, 045104 (2024)

    2024

  61. [68]

    Link, H.-H

    V. Link, H.-H. Tu, and W. T. Strunz, Open Quantum System Dynamics from Infinite Tensor Network Con- traction, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 200403 (2024)

    2024

  62. [69]

    Keeling, E

    J. Keeling, E. M. Stoudenmire, M.-C. Ba˜ nuls, and D. R. Reichman, Process Tensor Approaches to Non- Markovian Quantum Dynamics, Phys. Rev. X16, 020502 (2026)

    2026

  63. [71]

    Giudice, G

    G. Giudice, G. Giudici, M. Sonner, J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, D. A. Abanin, and L. Piroli, Temporal Entan- glement, Quasiparticles, and the Role of Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 220401 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    G. E. Fux, E. P. Butler, P. R. Eastham, B. W. Lovett, and J. Keeling, Efficient Exploration of Hamiltonian Pa- rameter Space for Optimal Control of Non-Markovian Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 200401 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Kahlert, V

    F. Kahlert, V. Link, R. Hartmann, and W. T. Strunz, Simulating the Landau–Zener sweep in deeply sub- Ohmic environments, J. Chem. Phys.161, 184108 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    Mickiewicz, V

    K. Mickiewicz, V. Link, and W. T. Strunz, Exact Flo- quet Dynamics of Strongly Damped Driven Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 200201 (2026)

    2026

  67. [75]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech. 2005, P04010 (2005)

    2005

  68. [76]

    Schuch, M

    N. Schuch, M. M. Wolf, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Entropy Scaling and Simulability by Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 030504 (2008)

    2008

  69. [77]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix Product States for Dynamical Simulation of Infinite Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 240603 (2009)

    2009

  70. [78]

    M. B. Hastings and R. Mahajan, Connecting entangle- ment in time and space: Improving the folding algo- rithm, Phys. Rev. A91, 032306 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Overcom- ing the entanglement barrier in quantum many-body dynamics via space-time duality, Phys. Rev. B107, L060305 (2023)

    2023

  72. [80]

    Sonner, A

    M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Influence functional of many-body systems: Temporal entangle- ment and matrix-product state representation, Annals of Physics Special Issue on Philip W. Anderson,435, 168677 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Vilkoviskiy and D

    I. Vilkoviskiy and D. A. Abanin, Bound on approximat- ing non-Markovian dynamics by tensor networks in the time domain, Phys. Rev. B109, 205126 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    Thoenniss, I

    J. Thoenniss, I. Vilkoviskiy, and D. A. Abanin, Efficient pseudomode representation and complexity of quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B112, 155114 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of mo- tion (HEOM), J

    Y. Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of mo- tion (HEOM), J. Chem. Phys.153, 020901 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    M. Xu, V. Vadimov, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Anker- hold, Colloquium: Simulating non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.98, 021002 (2026)

    2026

  77. [85]

    Dorda, M

    A. Dorda, M. Nuss, W. von der Linden, and E. Arrigoni, Auxiliary master equation approach to nonequilibrium correlated impurities, Phys. Rev. B89, 165105 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    G. Park, Z. Huang, Y. Zhu, C. Yang, G. K.-L. Chan, and L. Lin, Quasi-Lindblad pseudomode theory for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B110, 195148 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Ortega-Taberner, E

    C. Ortega-Taberner, E. O’Neill, E. Butler, G. E. Fux, and P. R. Eastham, Unifying methods for optimal con- trol in non-Markovian quantum systems via process tensors, The Journal of Chemical Physics161, 124119 8 (2024)

    2024

  80. [88]

    Buˇ ca and T

    B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: Transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys.14, 073007 (2012)

    2012

  81. [89]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    2014

  82. [90]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Code- base release 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Physics Codebases , 004 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    Schmutz, Real-time green’s functions in many body problems, Z Physik B30, 97 (1978)

    M. Schmutz, Real-time green’s functions in many body problems, Z Physik B30, 97 (1978)

    1978

  85. [93]

    Prosen, Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems, New J

    T. Prosen, Third quantization: A general method to solve master equations for quadratic open Fermi sys- tems, New J. Phys.10, 043026 (2008)

    2008

  86. [94]

    A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, Super-fermion repre- sentation of quantum kinetic equations for the electron transport problem, J. Chem. Phys.134, 044121 (2011)

    2011

  87. [95]

    Brenes, J

    M. Brenes, J. J. Mendoza-Arenas, A. Purkayastha, M. T. Mitchison, S. R. Clark, and J. Goold, Tensor- Network Method to Simulate Strongly Interacting Quantum Thermal Machines, Phys. Rev. X10, 031040 (2020)

    2020

  88. [96]

    Corboz and G

    P. Corboz and G. Vidal, Fermionic multiscale entangle- ment renormalization ansatz, Phys. Rev. B80, 165129 (2009)

    2009

  89. [97]

    Vidal, Classical Simulation of Infinite-Size Quantum Lattice Systems in One Spatial Dimension, Phys

    G. Vidal, Classical Simulation of Infinite-Size Quantum Lattice Systems in One Spatial Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 070201 (2007)

    2007

  90. [98]

    Cohen, E

    G. Cohen, E. Gull, D. R. Reichman, and A. J. Millis, Taming the Dynamical Sign Problem in Real-Time Evo- lution of Quantum Many-Body Problems, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 266802 (2015)

    2015

  91. [99]

    Bayat, T

    A. Bayat, T. J. G. Apollaro, S. Paganelli, G. De Chiara, H. Johannesson, S. Bose, and P. Sodano, Nonequilib- rium critical scaling in quantum thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. B93, 201106 (2016)

    2016

  92. [100]

    Chandran, A

    A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, and S. L. Sondhi, Kibble-Zurek problem: Universality and the scaling limit, Phys. Rev. B86, 064304 (2012)

    2012

  93. [101]

    Bruognolo, N.-O

    B. Bruognolo, N.-O. Linden, F. Schwarz, S.-S. B. Lee, K. Stadler, A. Weichselbaum, M. Vojta, F. B. Anders, and J. von Delft, Open Wilson chains for quantum im- purity models: Keeping track of all bath modes, Phys. Rev. B95, 121115 (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    Stefanini, Y.-F

    M. Stefanini, Y.-F. Qu, T. Esslinger, S. Gopalakrish- nan, E. Demler, and J. Marino, Dissipative realization of Kondo models, Commun Phys8, 212 (2025)

    2025

  95. [103]

    Y.-F. Qu, M. Stefanini, T. Shi, T. Esslinger, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Marino, and E. Demler, Varia- tional approach to the dynamics of dissipative quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B111, 155113 (2025)

    2025

  96. [104]

    Vanhoecke, N

    M. Vanhoecke, N. Tsuji, and M. Schir` o, Dissipa- tive Kondo physics in the Anderson Impurity Model with two-body losses (2025), arXiv:2506.22302 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Nayak, J

    M. Nayak, J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, D. A. Abanin, and P. Werner, Steady-state dynamical mean field the- ory based on influence functional matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B112, 035103 (2025)

    2025

  98. [106]

    Amaricci, A

    A. Amaricci, A. Richaud, M. Capone, N. Darkwah Op- pong, and F. Scazza, Engineering the Kondo impurity problem with alkaline-earth-atom arrays, Phys. Rev. A 112, 043301 (2025)

    2025

  99. [107]

    J. Maki, L. Stocker, and O. Zilberberg, Pathway to Kondo physics in ytterbium atom chains with repul- sive spin impurities (2026), arXiv:2601.11449 [cond- mat.quant-gas]

    2026

  100. [108]

    Ma, private communication (2026)

    Z. Ma, private communication (2026)

    2026

  101. [109]

    Vojta, Impurity quantum phase transitions, Philo- sophical Magazine86, 1807 (2006)

    M. Vojta, Impurity quantum phase transitions, Philo- sophical Magazine86, 1807 (2006)

    2006

  102. [110]

    J. Gan, N. Andrei, and P. Coleman, Perturbative ap- proach to the non-Fermi-liquid fixed point of the over- screened Kondo problem, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 686 (1993). Appendix A: Automated Superfermion Stitching Here we sketch the automatic stitching machinery, us- ing tensor-net...

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.