Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Ordinary Disordered Materials Can Carry Hyperuniform Physical Fields

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ordinary disordered materials can carry hyperuniform physical fields.

desk verdict A clean, correct demonstration that derivative operators with low-k zeros turn white-noise parent fields into hyperuniform sources and cancel Green-pole divergences, though the abstract overstates the condition on the parent spectrum. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.16579 v1 pith:4ZDK2R5B submitted 2026-07-18 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Liyu Zhong , Haina Wang , Yang Jiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 61.43.-j62.20.D77.22.-d
keywords hyperuniformityfieldoperator-inducedspectraldensityboundchargeincompatibilitygauge-likeconstraintresidualstress
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that hyperuniformity, the suppression of long-wavelength fluctuations, does not have to be a property of material structure. It shows that ordinary, structurally nonhyperuniform disordered materials can host hyperuniform physical fields such as charge, bound current, and stress. The mechanism is that many physical fields are generated from more primitive parent fields through local differential operators whose Fourier symbols vanish at small wavenumber. These operator zeros kill the long-wavelength fluctuations of the derived field, making it hyperuniform regardless of the disorder in the parent field. If true, this shifts the design of quiet materials from arranging matter to choosing the right field-generating constraints.

What carries the argument

The key identity is Eq. (4): χ_q(k) ~ k^{2m} χ_ψ(k), where χ_q is the spectral density of the derived field, χ_ψ is the spectral density of the parent field, and m is the order of the differential operator A(∇) that generates the source. The operator's Fourier symbol vanishes as k^m at small wavenumber, imprinting a zero that suppresses long-wavelength fluctuations in the source. The resulting source hyperuniformity then competes with the Green-function singularity in the response equation.

What would settle it

Take a real disordered material known to have long-range correlated eigenstrain or polarization fields (e.g., a material with power-law correlated disorder) and measure the spectral density of the derived bound charge or incompatibility. If the derived spectrum shows a low-k exponent less than 2 (for first-order) or less than 4 (for second-order), the mechanism is violated. Alternatively, compute the stress or electric-field spectrum for a parent field with χ_ψ ∼ k^{-2} and check whether the response still diverges as k^{-2} instead of plateauing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a local physical operator with a gauge-like constraint, when applied to an ordinary short-range disordered parent field, produces a derived physical field whose spectral density vanishes as k^{2m} at small wavenumber, where m is the order of the operator. This makes the derived field hyperuniform even though the parent field is not. The paper verifies this for three cases: a second-order compatibility operator acting on eigenstrain produces incompatibility with χ ~ k^4, a first-order divergence acting on polarization produces bound charge with χ ~ k^2, and a first-order curl acting on magnetization produces bound current with χ ~ k^2. In each case, the operator-impr

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the parent field is an ordinary short-range disordered field with nonvanishing low-wavenumber spectral density, χ_ψ(k) ∼ k^0; if the parent field has long-range correlations with χ_ψ(k) ∼ k^{-α} for α ≥ 2m, the derived source is no longer hyperuniform and the response regularization fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism holds, any disordered material whose parent fields (eigenstrain, polarization, magnetization) have ordinary short-range correlations will automatically produce hyperuniform source fields such as incompatibility, bound charge, and bound current.
  • Residual stress, electric field, and magnetic field responses generated from such physical sources remain finite at large scales, avoiding the long-wavelength catastrophes that would occur for white-noise sources.
  • The concept of hyperuniformity broadens from a structural property of matter to a property of physical-field generation, suggesting that hidden quietness can emerge from local constraints rather than special arrangement.
  • The framework identifies a general competition between source-operator zeros and Green-function poles that controls long-wavelength material response, applicable to active stress, plastic distortion, defect density, and hydrodynamic forcing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One can test whether actual material systems (e.g., ferroelectrics, plastically deformed crystals) exhibit the predicted k^2 or k^4 scaling in bound charge or incompatibility spectra, even when their structural correlations are ordinary; this would extend the numerical finding to real materials.
  • The mechanism suggests a design principle: instead of engineering hyperuniform microstructures, one could engineer the gauge-like constraints themselves, for instance, by controlling the parent field's correlations so that its low-k spectrum is exactly balanced to produce a desired response spectrum.
  • The competition between source zeros and Green-function poles could also manifest in dynamical responses, such as wave propagation or acoustic scattering, where the source architecture would alter long-wavelength attenuation and dispersion beyond the static examples shown.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper argues that local differential operators with Fourier symbols vanishing as k^m can convert ordinary, non-hyperuniform parent fields into hyperuniform physical source fields. The central formal statement is Eq. (4): χ_q(k) ~ k^{2m} χ_ψ(k), so a parent with χ_ψ ~ k^0 produces a source with χ_q ~ k^{2m}. The authors verify this mechanism numerically in three settings: (i) a second-order incompatibility operator acting on random eigenstrain, yielding χ_η ~ k^4 and a regular residual-stress spectrum; (ii) a first-order divergence operator acting on polarization, yielding χ_ρ ~ k^2 and a regular electric-field spectrum; and (iii) a first-order curl operator acting on magnetization, yielding χ_J ~ k^2 and a regular magnetic-field spectrum. The numerical exponents agree with the predicted k^2 and k^4 scalings within bootstrap error bars, and rms-matched white-source controls show the expected infrared divergences. The paper frames this as 'operator-induced hyperuniformity' and as a general principle of source-zero versus Green-pole competition.

Significance. If the scope is properly qualified, the core result is a clean and useful generalization of hyperuniformity from structure to physical fields. The derivation is parameter-free, the predicted scaling exponents are falsifiable, and the three examples span different operator families (divergence, curl, and second-order compatibility), which strengthens the claim of mechanism-level generality. The numerical design is sound: the physical and white sources are rms-matched and passed through the same Green operator, so the contrast is attributable to source architecture. The main reservation is that the abstract and several framing statements overstate the robustness condition: Eq. (4) requires the parent spectrum to grow more slowly than k^{-2m}, whereas the paper's own proofs and simulations assume χ_ψ ~ k^0. With that caveat made explicit and with a short discussion of the failure regime, the paper would be a valuable contribution to the hyperuniformity and disordered-materials literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. II.A, Eq. (4)] The abstract's claim that hyperuniformity emerges 'irrespective of the large-scale disorder and nonhyperuniformity of the parent field' is not supported by the derivation. Eq. (4) gives χ_q(k) ~ k^{2m} χ_ψ(k). Hyperuniformity of q requires χ_ψ(k) to grow slower than k^{-2m}; for a parent with χ_ψ ~ k^{-α} and α ≥ 2m, the derived source is not hyperuniform. For m=1, a parent with χ_ψ ~ k^{-2} yields χ_q ~ k^0; for m=2, χ_ψ ~ k^{-4} yields the same failure. The paper's own construction imposes the stronger condition χ_ψ ~ k^0 (Sec. II.A before Eq. (4); Sec. II.B random-inclusion construction). Thus the abstract statement should be revised to limit the claim to parent fields with ordinary short-range disorder, and the general condition for hyperuniformity should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Sec. II.B and Sec. IV.A] The numerical demonstrations use synthetic parent fields generated as random inclusions with short-range disorder, so they do not by themselves establish applicability to real eigenstrain, polarization, or magnetization fields in disordered materials. Real parent fields can exhibit long-range correlations, e.g., χ_ψ ~ k^{-α} near critical points or in plastically deformed solids. The paper should either test the predicted breakdown with parent spectra χ_ψ ~ k^{-α} for representative α, or explicitly narrow the applicability claim to parent fields whose low-k spectral density is non-singular. This is load-bearing because the title and abstract promise a statement about 'ordinary disordered materials' in general.
  3. [Sec. II.A, Eq. (4)] The condition under which the operator zero 'exactly cancels' the Green-function pole is stated only through the examples. The general criterion deserves a formal statement: the response spectrum is regular when 2m exceeds the order of the Green operator's infrared singularity. The paper says this verbally in Sec. II.E, but a short derivation for a generic response operator would make the 'source-zero versus Green-pole' claim precise and would also clarify when partial suppression (rather than full regularization) occurs.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction] There is a duplicated word: 'demonstrate principles of this this new framework' should be 'this new framework'.
  2. [General] The paper repeatedly references the Supporting Information for fitting windows, shell counts, bootstrap details, and formal definitions of spectral densities for tensor fields, but no SI is included with the manuscript. Without these details, the numerical exponents cannot be independently evaluated.
  3. [Data Availability] The statement 'codes and data are available upon request' is weak for a computational paper. Archiving the code and generated data would substantially improve reproducibility and is not a major intellectual hurdle.
  4. [Sec. II.A, Eq. (13)] The notation 'inc ε*' is used without a formal definition in the main text. Please define it explicitly, e.g., as the scalar incompatibility operator defined by the right-hand side of Eq. (13).
  5. [Sec. II.D] The electrostatic and magnetostatic examples are said to be 'two independent first-order operator families', but both are essentially first-order derivatives contracted with a vector field. This is fine, but the wording could acknowledge that they are two instances of the same m=1 mechanism rather than two structurally different mechanisms.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reasoning: k^2/k^4 source spectra follow from Eq. (4) under an explicit white-noise parent assumption; the abstract's 'irrespective' claim is an overstatement, but not a fitted-input or self-citation circularity.

full rationale

The load-bearing relation is Eq. (4): chi_q(k) ~ k^(2m) chi_psi(k), obtained by squaring the Fourier symbol of q = A(grad) psi. This is an identity, not a fit. The k^2 and k^4 predictions are explicitly conditioned on chi_psi(k) ~ k^0 ('if the parent field is an ordinary short-range disordered field', Sec. II.A). The numerical parents are independent white-noise inclusions with no hyperuniform constraint; the source spectra and response spectra are computed from the same operators, and the white-source controls are rms-matched. No parameter is fitted to produce the claimed exponents, and no load-bearing result is imported from the authors' prior papers (self-citations at Refs. 15,17,25,38,41 are background examples). The only notable flaw is the abstract's phrase 'irrespective of the large-scale disorder and nonhyperuniformity of the parent field': Eq. (4) contains chi_psi(k) as a multiplicative factor, so a parent with chi_psi(k) ~ k^(-alpha), alpha >= 2m, would yield a nonhyperuniform source and no response regularization. That is a correctness/scope caveat, not circularity, because the derivation itself states the required parent condition. Score reflects the minor overstatement, not a circular derivation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the only exponents in the paper are measured from simulations and compared to the predicted integer values 2 and 4. The load-bearing assumptions are the short-range disorder of the parent fields and the validity of the continuum field equations. No new physical entities are introduced; the only new object is the conceptual label 'operator-induced hyperuniformity.'

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Parent fields are ordinary short-range disordered with non-vanishing spectral density at k→0 (χ_ψ ∼ k^0).
    Invoked before Eq. (4) and in Sec. II.B for random inclusions. If parent fields are long-range correlated, the derived-field hyperuniformity and the response regularization fail.
  • domain assumption Standard continuum field equations: incompatibility operator (Eq. 13), bound charge ρ_b = -∇·P, bound current J_b = (∇×M)_z, Airy representation Δ²χ = Yη, and Poisson/magnetostatic Green operators.
    The entire numerical demonstration is built on these textbook continuum relations; the paper does not test their validity at the microscale.
  • standard math Spectral density of a derived field is the parent spectral density multiplied by the squared operator symbol (Eq. 4).
    This follows directly from the Fourier transform of q = A(∇)ψ and the definition of spectral density; used as the central derivation.
  • standard math Hyperuniformity of a field is defined by lim_{k→0} χ(k) = 0, following Torquato's generalized hyperuniformity.
    The paper adopts this definition to label derived fields hyperuniform; it is a background definition, not a new assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ordinary Disordered Materials Can Carry Hyperuniform Physical Fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ZDK2R5B

@misc{pith2026260716579,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ordinary Disordered Materials Can Carry Hyperuniform Physical Fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ZDK2R5B}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.16579}
}
read the original abstract

Fluctuations in disordered matter play a central role in determining material properties and physical responses. Recent studies have identified an exotic class of systems known as structurally hyperuniform materials, in which large-scale density fluctuations are anomalously suppressed through special spatial organization of particles, phases, or microstructural features. Here we demonstrate that ordinary, structurally nonhyperuniform disordered materials can nevertheless support hyperuniform physical scalar, vector, and tensor fields such as charge, bound current, vorticity, defect density, and stress. We develop a general theoretical framework in which a physical field is generated from a more primitive parent field through a local physical operator. In Fourier space, the spectrum of the derived field is determined by the product of the parent-field spectrum and the Fourier symbol of the operator. When the operator embodies a local gauge-like constraint, its Fourier symbol possesses zeros at small wavenumber, eliminating the corresponding long-wavelength fluctuations. As a consequence, the derived field exhibits complete suppression of infinite-wavelength intensity fluctuations, irrespective of the large-scale disorder and nonhyperuniformity of the parent field. We demonstrate this mechanism in elastic, electrostatic, and magnetostatic settings, showing that operator-generated incompatibility, bound charge, and bound-current fields can become hyperuniform even when their parent eigenstrain, polarization, or magnetization fields remain conventionally disordered. These findings broaden the notion of hyperuniformity from a structural property of matter to a universal field phenomenon generated by local physical constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.16579 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. confirms this prediction. At N = 512, the bound-charge source exponent is β = 1.883 ± 0.062, al￾ready close to the expected value 2, while the physical electric-field response has exponent β = −0.009 ± 0.066, consistent with a regular plateau. The white-charge con￾trol gives β = −1.972 ± 0.074, close to the predicted k −2 infrared enhancement. At N = 1024, the asymp￾totic scaling becomes even clearer: the source exp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Torquato,Random Heterogeneous Materials: Mi- crostructure and Macroscopic Properties, Interdisci- plinary Applied Mathematics, Vol

    S. Torquato,Random Heterogeneous Materials: Mi- crostructure and Macroscopic Properties, Interdisci- plinary Applied Mathematics, Vol. 16 (Springer, New York, 2002)

    2002

  2. [2]

    Sahimi,Heterogeneous Materials I: Linear Transport and Optical Properties(Springer, New York, 2003)

    M. Sahimi,Heterogeneous Materials I: Linear Transport and Optical Properties(Springer, New York, 2003)

    2003

  3. [3]

    Kirkpatrick, Percolation and conduction, Reviews of Modern Physics45, 574 (1973)

    S. Kirkpatrick, Percolation and conduction, Reviews of Modern Physics45, 574 (1973)

    1973

  4. [4]

    J. P. Sethna, K. A. Dahmen, and C. R. Myers, Crackling noise, Nature410, 242 (2001)

    2001

  5. [5]

    X. Ma, J. Pausch, and M. E. Cates, Theory of hyperuni- formity at the absorbing state transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17391 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Torquato and F

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Local density fluctua- tions, hyperuniformity, and order metrics, Physical Re- view E68, 041113 (2003)

    2003

  7. [7]

    Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys

    S. Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys. Rep. 745, 1 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    C. E. Zachary and S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity in point patterns and two-phase random heterogeneous media, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment2009, P12015 (2009)

    2009

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Torquato, Hyperuniformity and its generalizations, Physical Review E94, 022122 (2016)

    S. Torquato, Hyperuniformity and its generalizations, Physical Review E94, 022122 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Torquato, J

    S. Torquato, J. Kim, M. A. Klatt, R. Car, and P. J. Steinhardt, Hyperuniformity of weighted particle sys- tems, Physical Review X16, 011042 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    DeglInnocenti, Y

    R. DeglInnocenti, Y. D. Shah, L. Masini, A. Ronzani, A. Pitanti, Y. Ren, D. S. Jessop, A. Tredicucci, H. E. Beere, and D. A. Ritchie, Hyperuniform disordered tera- hertz quantum cascade laser, Sci. Rep.6, 19325 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Le Thien, D

    Q. Le Thien, D. McDermott, C. Reichhardt, and C. Re- ichhardt, Enhanced pinning for vortices in hyperuniform pinning arrays and emergent hyperuniform vortex config- urations with quenched disorder, Physical Review B96, 094516 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Y. A. Gerasimenko, I. Vaskivskyi, M. Litskevich, J. Ravnik, J. Vodeb, M. Diego, V. Kabanov, and D. Mi- hailovic, Quantum jamming transition to a correlated electron glass in 1t-tas 2, Nat. Mater.18, 1078 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    G. Rumi, J. A. S´ anchez, F. El ´ ıas, R. C. Maldonado, J. Puig, N. R. C. Bolecek, G. Nieva, M. Konczykowski, Y. Fasano, and A. B. Kolton, Hyperuniform vortex pat- terns at the surface of type-ii superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033057 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Zheng, L

    Y. Zheng, L. Liu, H. Nan, Z.-X. Shen, G. Zhang, D. Chen, L. He, W. Xu, M. Chen, Y. Jiao, and H. Zhuang, Dis- ordered hyperuniformity in two-dimensional amorphous silica, Sci. Adv.6, eaba0826 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Sakai, R

    S. Sakai, R. Arita, and T. Ohtsuki, Quantum phase tran- sition between hyperuniform density distributions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09698 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    D. Chen, R. Samajdar, Y. Jiao, and S. Torquato, Anoma- lous suppression of large-scale density fluctuations in classical and quantum spin liquids, Proceedings of the 10 National Academy of Sciences122, e2416111122 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Florescu, S

    M. Florescu, S. Torquato, and P. J. Steinhardt, Designer disordered materials with large, complete photonic band gaps, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.106, 20658 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    Haberko, N

    J. Haberko, N. Muller, and F. Scheffold, Direct laser writing of three-dimensional network structures as tem- plates for disordered photonic materials, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043822 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Florescu, P

    M. Florescu, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato, Optical cavities and waveguides in hyperuniform disordered pho- tonic solids, Phys. Rev. B87, 165116 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    W. Man, M. Florescu, E. P. Williamson, Y. He, S. R. Hashemizad, B. Y. C. Leung, D. R. Liner, S. Torquato, P. M. Chaikin, and P. J. Steinhardt, Isotropic band gaps and freeform waveguides observed in hyperuniform disordered photonic solids, Proceedings of the National Academy o...

    2013

  14. [22]

    Muller, J

    N. Muller, J. Haberko, C. Marichy, and F. Scheffold, Pho- tonic hyperuniform networks obtained by silicon double inversion of polymer templates, Optica4, 361 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    X. Li, A. Das, and D. Bi, Biological tissue-inspired tun- able photonic fluid, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115, 6650 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Donev, F

    A. Donev, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Unexpected density fluctuations in jammed disordered sphere pack- ings, Physical Review Letters95, 090604 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    C. E. Zachary, Y. Jiao, and S. Torquato, Hyperuni- form long-range correlations are a signature of disordered jammed hard-particle packings, Physical Review Letters 106, 178001 (2011)

    2011

  18. [26]

    J. R. Dale, J. D. Sartor, R. C. Dennis, and E. I. Cor- win, Hyperuniform jammed sphere packings have anoma- lous material properties, Physical Review E106, 024903 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Q.-L. Lei, M. P. Ciamarra, and R. Ni, Nonequilibrium strongly hyperuniform fluids of circle active particles with large local density fluctuations, Sci. Adv.5, eaau7423 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    Zhang and A

    B. Zhang and A. Snezhko, Hyperuniform active chiral fluids with tunable internal structure, Physical Review Letters128, 218002 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Lei and R

    Y. Lei and R. Ni, How does a hyperuniform fluid freeze?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2312866120 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Backofen, A

    R. Backofen, A. Y. Altawil, M. Salvalaglio, and A. Voigt, Nonequilibrium hyperuniform states in active turbulence, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2320719121 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Leoni, G

    F. Leoni, G. Franzese, E. C. O˘ guz, and F. Martelli, Confinement-driven emergence of hyperuniform fluids, Physical Review Research7, 043305 (2025)

    2025

  24. [32]

    Maire, Hyperuniformity in active fluids reshape nu- cleation and capillary-wave dynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20308 (2026)

    R. Maire, Hyperuniformity in active fluids reshape nu- cleation and capillary-wave dynamics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20308 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Huang, W

    M. Huang, W. Hu, S. Yang, Q.-X. Liu, and H. Zhang, Circular swimming motility and disordered hyperuniform state in an algae system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2100493118 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    R. L. Jack, I. R. Thompson, and P. Sollich, Hyperunifor- mity and phase separation in biased ensembles of trajec- tories for diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 060601 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Hexner, P

    D. Hexner, P. M. Chaikin, and D. Levine, Enhanced hy- peruniformity from random reorganization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 4294 (2017)

    2017

  28. [36]

    Lei and R

    Q.-L. Lei and R. Ni, Hydrodynamics of random- organizing hyperuniform fluids, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences116, 22983 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Wilken, A

    S. Wilken, A. Z. Guo, D. Levine, and P. M. Chaikin, Ran- dom close packing is least random in three dimensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09913 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Y. Jiao, T. Lau, H. Hatzikirou, M. Meyer-Hermann, J. C. Corbo, and S. Torquato, Avian photoreceptor patterns represent a disordered hyperuniform solution to a mul- tiscale packing problem, Physical Review E89, 022721 (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    Mayer, V

    A. Mayer, V. Balasubramanian, T. Mora, and A. M. Wal- czak, How a well-adapted immune system is organized, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA112, 5950 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Ge, The hidden order of turing patterns in arid and semi-arid vegetation ecosystems, Proc

    Z. Ge, The hidden order of turing patterns in arid and semi-arid vegetation ecosystems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA120, e2306514120 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Y. Liu, D. Chen, J. Tian, W. Xu, and Y. Jiao, Universal hyperuniform organization in looped leaf vein networks, Physical Review Letters133, 028401 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Li, Q.-L

    Z.-Q. Li, Q.-L. Lei, and Y.-q. Ma, Fluidization and anomalous density fluctuations in epithelial tissues with pulsating activity, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02981 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Maire and L

    R. Maire and L. Chaix, Hyperuniformity and conser- vation laws in non-equilibrium systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04242 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Elec- trodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984)

    1984

  38. [46]

    Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 323 (2010)

    2010

  39. [47]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Reviews of Modern Physics 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  40. [48]

    Doostmohammadi, J

    A. Doostmohammadi, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. M. Yeomans, and F. Sagu´ es, Active nematics, Nature Communications 9, 3246 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Alert, J

    R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Active turbu- lence, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13, 143 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    J. F. Nye, Some geometrical relations in dislocated crys- tals, Acta Metallurgica1, 153 (1953)

    1953

  43. [51]

    B. A. Bilby, R. Bullough, and E. Smith, Continuous distributions of dislocations: A new application of the methods of non-riemannian geometry, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences231, 263 (1955)

    1955

  44. [52]

    Kr”oner, Continuum theory of defects, inPhysics of Defects, Les Houches, Session XXXV, edited by R

    E. Kr”oner, Continuum theory of defects, inPhysics of Defects, Les Houches, Session XXXV, edited by R. Balian, M. Kl´ eman, and J.-P. Poirier (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981) pp. 215–315

    1981

  45. [53]

    Acharya, A model of crystal plasticity based on the theory of continuously distributed dislocations, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids49, 761 (2001)

    A. Acharya, A model of crystal plasticity based on the theory of continuously distributed dislocations, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids49, 761 (2001)

    2001

  46. [54]

    Gr”oger, T

    R. Gr”oger, T. Lookman, and A. Saxena, Defect-induced incompatibility of elastic strains: Dislocations within a 11 continuum theory, Physical Review B78, 184101 (2008)

    2008

  47. [55]

    J. D. Eshelby, The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences241, 376 (1957)

    1957

  48. [56]

    Mura,Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, 2nd ed., Mechanics of Elastic and Inelastic Solids (Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1987)

    T. Mura,Micromechanics of Defects in Solids, 2nd ed., Mechanics of Elastic and Inelastic Solids (Kluwer Aca- demic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1987)

    1987

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.