Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

d-band filling dictates magnetic stability in Mn- and Co-substituted FeRh alloys

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mn hole doping collapses FeRh's Curie temperature by about 450 K, while Co electron doping keeps it above 800 K.

desk verdict Solid full-composition computational map of Mn/Co in FeRh; the FM-reference caveat is real but not fatal, and the composition trend survives. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.17688 v1 pith:REEW6WCR submitted 2026-07-20 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Greeshma R , Rudra Banerjee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords FeRhd-bandfillingitinerantmagnetismCurietemperaturesuppressionexchangeinteractionscoherentpotentialapproximationspinpolarizationpseudogap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the magnetic stability of B2-ordered FeRh alloys is set by where the Fermi level sits relative to a pseudogap in the majority-spin band, not by volume or by distance to an antiferromagnetic state. Replacing Fe with Mn removes electrons, dragging the Fermi level out of that gap; spin polarization collapses and flips sign near x≈0.5, Mn-centred exchange turns antiferromagnetic, and the Curie temperature falls from about 834 K to 382 K. Replacing Fe with Co adds electrons, pins the Fermi level in the gap, and leaves the ferromagnet strong, with Curie temperature above 800 K and spin polarization near 0.75. The paper's central distinction is that a thermally fragile ferromagnet can still be energetically well separated from a competing antiferromagnetic ordering; the instability is 'itinerant magnetic softness' from near-cancellation of exchange interactions rather than from AFM–FM energy proximity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the majority-spin pseudogap of B2 FeRh and the Fermi level's position within it; the paper tracks how substitution shifts the Fermi level across the spin-resolved density of states. The quantitative machinery is the Liechtenstein exchange formula, which maps the itinerant electronic structure onto effective Heisenberg couplings Jij, and the competition parameter η = ΣJij/Σ|Jij|, which separates ferromagnetic from antiferromagnetic pathways. A decomposition of η into net (ΣJij) and total-magnitude (Σ|Jij|) parts distinguishes genuine weakening of the ferromagnetic backbone from near-cancellation of competing couplings.

What would settle it

A total-energy search over several antiferromagnetic and non-collinear orderings for Fe1-xMnxRh at high x (say 0.6–0.8); finding any configuration below the ferromagnetic state would invalidate the FM-reference exchange couplings and the predicted ~450 K Curie-temperature drop. Experimentally, measuring the Curie temperature and spin polarization of Mn-substituted FeRh films across x would test the predicted collapse and sign reversal near x≈0.5.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that d-band filling relative to the majority-spin pseudogap is the primary control parameter for magnetic stability in Fe1-x(Mn/Co)xRh. Mn hole doping moves the Fermi level out of the pseudogap, raising the majority-spin DOS at the Fermi level and lowering the minority-spin DOS, so spin polarization P falls through zero near x≈0.5 and reverses sign; Mn-centred exchange couplings develop antiferromagnetic components, quantified by a negative ηMn, and the mean-field Curie temperature drops by about 450 K even though the ferromagnetic state remains lower in energy than the G-type AFM-II state by up to about 0.35 eV/atom. Co electron doping leaves the Fermi level pinned in t

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the ferromagnetic state is the correct reference for extracting exchange couplings, but it verifies that assumption against only one competing magnetic order (the G-type antiferromagnetic state); the paper concedes other orderings could become competitive at high Mn content, and if any sits lower in energy, the computed exchange parameters, the negative Mn signature, and the Curie-temperature suppression would all be affected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tuning the valence-electron count of Fe-sublattice substituents can position the Curie temperature of FeRh alloys over a ~450 K range while the ferromagnetic state stays lower in energy than the G-type antiferromagnetic state.
  • A ferromagnet can be thermally fragile even when its ground state is well separated from a competing antiferromagnet, because the ordering temperature tracks the small net exchange field rather than the large total exchange scale.
  • Co substitution acts as a magnetic hardener: high spin polarization (|P|≈0.75) and ferromagnetic exchange persist across x=0.1–0.8, keeping the Curie temperature above 800 K even as the total moment falls by about 20%.
  • The same d-band-filling mechanism should operate in other itinerant magnets whose Fermi level sits near a one-spin-channel pseudogap, making hole doping soften and electron doping harden ferromagnetism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Fermi-level control parameter may allow graded design of magnetocaloric or spintronic materials, where the Curie temperature is deliberately placed near an operating temperature; the paper hints at this but does not explore device consequences.
  • A direct experimental test would compare the predicted TC(x) curve for Mn substitution against magnetometry on thin films; deviations at high x would signal that orderings beyond the collinear ferromagnetic state intervene.
  • The rigid-band picture suggests that other hole-doping substituents such as Cr or V on the Fe site should mimic Mn's softening, and other electron donors such as Ni should mimic Co's hardening—an extension the paper proposes but does not compute.
  • Because the analysis is performed in the ferromagnetic reference, the negative ηMn predicts that Mn moments in the FM host prefer antiferromagnetic alignment; measurements sensitive to short-range Mn–Mn correlations could test this locally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses SPR-KKR-CPA calculations with the PBE functional to study B2-ordered Fe1-x(Mn/Co)xRh alloys (x = 0.1–0.8), reporting spin-resolved DOS, magnetic moments, spin polarization, Liechtenstein exchange parameters, MFA Curie temperatures, and FM–G-type-AFM-II energy differences. The central claim is that d-band filling relative to the majority-spin pseudogap is the primary control parameter of magnetic stability. Mn substitution (hole doping) is said to move the Fermi level out of the pseudogap, collapse the spin polarization (P crosses zero near x ≈ 0.5), introduce negative Mn-centred exchange competition (η_Mn < 0), and suppress the MFA Curie temperature from 834 K to 382 K, even though the FM state remains higher-lying than the G-type AFM-II state by up to ~0.35 eV/atom. Co substitution (electron doping) is said to keep EF pinned in the pseudogap, preserving |P| ≈ 0.75, η_Co ≳ 0.37, and TC > 800 K. The authors introduce the concept of ‘itinerant magnetic softness’ to describe the Mn-driven near-cancellation of competing exchange interactions.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper would provide a simple, band-filling-based design rule for magnetic ordering temperatures in a technologically important FeRh alloy family, with falsifiable predictions (e.g., a ~450 K TC suppression in Mn-substituted films and preserved high TC in Co-substituted films). The systematic composition series, the use of CPA plus Liechtenstein exchange analysis, the site-resolved decomposition of the competition parameter, and the generally self-consistent tabulated data are strengths. The paper is also honest in listing caveats, and one of these caveats is directly load-bearing: the FM reference is validated only against a single AFM ordering. Because the FM reference underlies the Jij, η, and TC results, the central claim is not yet established at high Mn content.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3, Fig. 1b; Sec. 4.2, third caveat] The FM reference for the Liechtenstein analysis is validated only against the G-type AFM-II configuration. The paper's own third caveat in Sec. 4.2 states that other magnetic configurations ‘may become energetically competitive in the Mn-rich regime’. This is not a remote possibility: the end-member MnRh is antiferromagnetic, yet Table 1 reports ΔE = 0.346 eV/atom favouring FM at x = 0.8, which is hard to reconcile with the known ground state and with the acknowledged PBE tendency to overstabilize FM (ref. [30]). If an A-type, C-type, or spin-spiral state lies below FM at high Mn content, then the FM-reference Jij, the η_Mn < 0 signature, and the computed TC cascade are all evaluated about an unstable reference, and the abstract's statement that the FM state is ‘well separated’ would be incorrect. I request explicit total-energy comparisons against at least A-type, C-type, and one simple
  2. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (4), Table 3] For the Mn series, η_Mn < 0 and the net Mn-centred exchange nearly vanishes. In the MFA, TC is obtained from the largest eigenvalue λ_max of the Heisenberg exchange matrix. When the exchange competition is strong, λ_max may correspond to an AFM or canted eigenmode, not to the ferromagnetic mode the paper identifies as the Curie temperature. The authors do not report the eigenvector associated with λ_max, nor do they verify that the classical ground state of the fitted Heisenberg model is FM. If the leading instability is non-FM, then the plotted ‘TC’ is not the ordering temperature of the FM phase, and the ‘itinerant magnetic softness’ narrative would need to be reformulated. Please report the eigenvector(s) at the instability, and if needed, compute the FM-mode TC separately and reconcile the Heisenberg ground state with the DFT ΔE of the G-type AFM-II and other orderings.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Tables 1–2] The separation of d-band-filling effects from magneto-volume effects is inferred from the different lattice-parameter evolution of the two series (Mn: ~0.1% change, TC drops; Co: ~0.9% change, TC stable). However, no fixed-lattice calculation is reported. Since a change in volume also shifts EF and modifies the Jij, the observed trends do not uniquely identify chemical filling as the causal factor. The claim that d-band filling is ‘primary’ rather than magneto-volume would be substantially strengthened by computing the two series at a common lattice constant (e.g., the parent FeRh value) or by an explicit decomposition of the TC change into volume and substitutional contributions. As written, the magneto-volume argument is suggestive but not conclusive.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1), Tables 1–2] The minority-channel DOS N↓ is listed with a negative sign in Tables 1 and 2, but Eq. (1) is written with N↓(EF) as a positive magnitude. The reported P values correspond to using |N↓|. Please state this convention explicitly near Eq. (1) to avoid ambiguity.
  2. [Eq. (5), Sec. 3.4] The definition of η in Eq. (5) sums over all i,j, but the text then evaluates it separately for Mn- or Fe-centred environments. Please specify precisely which Jij pairs enter each restricted sum, and state the real-space cutoff or number of coordination shells used in the sums.
  3. [Eq. (3)] The LKAG integral in Eq. (3) contains the Fermi–Dirac function with β = 1/kBT, but the smearing temperature used in the numerical integration is not stated. Please report this value and any convergence tests with respect to it and the k-mesh.
  4. [Sec. 4.1] The schematic expression J(R) ~ cos(2kF R + φ)/R^3 and the associated single-kF language are illustrative only for a multiband d-electron system. Please mark this explicitly as a schematic picture to avoid implying that a single Fermi-surface spanning vector was extracted from the DFT calculations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivation is self-contained, with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's core quantities—spin-resolved DOS, Fermi energy, spin polarization P, FM–AFM energy difference ΔE, Liechtenstein exchange parameters Jij, and the resulting MFA Curie temperature—are all independent first-principles outputs. No parameter is fitted to the data that is then 'predicted.' The explanatory language that exchange competition suppresses TC uses Eq. (4) (TC from the largest eigenvalue of the Jij matrix) and Eq. (5) (η from sums of Jij), which are indeed both derived from the same exchange matrix, but this is a consistent interpretation of the calculated Jij, not a reduction by construction: η is not equal to λmax, and the paper separately decomposes net versus total exchange magnitudes to distinguish genuine weakening from near-cancellation. The Mn–Co comparison provides independent falsifiable content: the two series differ in doping direction, and the opposite behaviors of P, η, and TC are computed, not imposed. Citations to the authors' prior work [11] for the parent FeRh electronic structure and lattice constant are not load-bearing because the same parent values are recomputed in Tables 1 and 3. The paper's own third caveat in Sec. 4.2—that magnetic orderings beyond G-type AFM-II may compete at high Mn content—bears on the validity or completeness of the FM reference state, which is a correctness/robustness concern, not a circularity: it does not make any derived quantity equal to an input by construction. No circular step of any of the enumerated kinds could be identified from the manuscript text.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper fits no parameter to experimental target data — all quantities (lattice constants, EF, DOS, Jij, TC, η) are outputs of a standard KKR-CPA+LKAG pipeline. The load is carried by modeling assumptions (PBE, CPA single-site, FM reference validated against only one AFM ordering, MFA) and by two unstated numerical settings (LKAG smearing temperature, exchange-cluster cutoff). The central claim 'd-band filling is the primary control parameter' additionally rests on an interpretive separation of filling versus volume/band-renormalization effects that the calculations themselves do not control for.

free parameters (2)
  • Unstated Fermi-Dirac smearing temperature (β) in the LKAG integral, Eq. (3)
    The exchange integrals Jij are temperature-broadened via f[β(ε−εF)], but the smearing temperature used in the numerical integration is never reported; Jij magnitudes (and hence TC and η) are sensitive to this broadening.
  • Real-space cutoff / number of coordination shells for Jij sums
    η, Σj Jij and Σj |Jij| (Tables 3-4, Fig. 4) are evaluated 'over the same neighbor shells,' but the cluster size used for the MFA eigenvalue problem and the sums is not stated; results change with the truncation range.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption PBE exchange-correlation without Hubbard U is quantitatively adequate for FeRh's itinerant magnetism
    Section 2 (no-Hubbard-U paragraph) argues from refs [28,13,14,29,30]; the paper's own caveat notes PBE favors FM over AFM, so ΔE magnitudes are not quantitative ground-state predictions (Sec. 4.2, first caveat).
  • domain assumption Single-site CPA disorder treatment: local relaxations average to zero and are negligible
    Section 2 paragraph on CPA; justified by size-match and <1.2% lattice variation, but not verified by supercell relaxations.
  • domain assumption FM state is a valid magnetic reference for the Liechtenstein analysis across x=0.1-0.8
    Section 3 and Fig. 1b: tested only against G-type AFM-II; Sec. 4.2, third caveat, concedes other non-collinear/AFM orders may compete at high Mn content.
  • domain assumption MFA Curie temperature (Eq. 4) reliably tracks composition trends, accepting 20-30% absolute overestimate
    Section 2, after Eq. (4); basis for the '~450 K suppression' figure.
  • ad hoc to paper EF position relative to a compositionally robust majority-spin pseudogap (rigid-band-like picture) is the operative control parameter, distinct from band renormalization and volume
    Sections 3.1-3.2; the DOS in Fig. 2 actually renormalizes with composition, so the 'pinning' narrative is an interpretation of computed trends rather than a demonstrated independent variable; the volume-vs-filling separation is indirect (comparing Mn vs Co lattice-parameter changes).
  • domain assumption Muffin-tin geometry, scalar-relativistic treatment, lmax=2, and the stated k-mesh are sufficient
    Section 2, Computational Methods.
invented entities (2)
  • 'Itinerant magnetic softness'
    purpose: Interpretive label for the regime in which η→0, |P| collapses, and TC drops sharply — used to claim the instability is exchange-topological rather than energy-proximity driven.
    Coined term defined by three signatures (η≈0, |P|→0, TC suppression), all computed from the same KKR-CPA+LKAG+MFA pipeline; no measurement or external constraint is proposed, so the concept has no falsifiable handle outside the paper's own calculations. It organizes the results but adds no predictive content beyond the computed quantities.
  • 'Magnetic hardener' (Co-centred exchange)
    purpose: Descriptive label for Co's preservation of FM exchange and TC>800 K.
    Analogy label for the computed Co-centred ηCo≳0.37 and roughly constant |J| sums; descriptive, with no independent evidence beyond the same computation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of d-band filling dictates magnetic stability in Mn- and Co-substituted FeRh alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/REEW6WCR

@misc{pith2026260717688,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: d-band filling dictates magnetic stability in Mn- and Co-substituted FeRh alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/REEW6WCR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.17688}
}
abstract

The composition-dependent magnetic properties of B2-ordered \zfr~alloys with substitutional disorder on the Fe sublattice are investigated using first-principles calculations within the coherent potential approximation. By systematically substituting Mn and Co on the Fe sublattice, we establish $d$-band filling as the primary control parameter governing magnetic stability in this itinerant system. Mn substitution (hole doping) shifts the Fermi level into the minority-spin bonding states, driving a collapse of spin polarization (crossing zero at $x \approx 0.5$) and the emergence of competing antiferromagnetic interactions ($\eta_\mathrm{Mn} < 0$). Even though the ferromagnetic configuration remains energetically well separated from the G-type AFM-II configuration across the studied range ($\Delta E$ up to $\sim$0.35~eV/atom), this exchange competition drives an ``itinerant magnetic softness'' that suppresses the Curie temperature by $\sim$450~K -- a finite-temperature instability set by the near-cancellation of competing exchange interactions rather than by AFM--FM energy proximity. In contrast, Co substitution (electron doping) acts as a ``magnetic hardener'' by pinning the Fermi level within the majority-spin pseudogap, preserving high spin polarization ($|P| \approx 0.75$) and stabilizing ferromagnetic exchange across the full composition range. These results show that tuning the Fermi level relative to the pseudogap provides a systematic, microscopic framework for controlling magnetic stability in B2-ordered itinerant magnets, distinct from simple magneto-volume models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.17688 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structure and FM–AFM energetics of Fe1 –x (Mn/Co)xRh. (a) B2 (CsCl-type) crystal structure of FeRh. Fe and Rh occupy two interpenetrating simple cubic sublattices (1a and 1b Wyckoff sites, respectively); in the disordered alloys, Mn or Co randomly replaces Fe at the 1a site with probability x. (b) AFM–FM energy difference ∆E = EAFM − EFM (eV/atom) for Mn- and Co-substituted FeRh. Positive values indicate that the FM… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spin-resolved density of states at representative compositions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Total energy versus lattice parameter for the FM and AFM configurations of Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Site-resolved exchange interactions Jij versus coordination distance at representative compositions (x = 0.1, 0.5, 0.8): Mn-centred (top row) and Co-centred (bottom row). With increasing Mn content the nearest-neighbour ferromagnetic cou￾pling weakens and antiferromagn…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Unified magnetic phase diagram of Fe1 –x (Mn/Co)xRh with substitutional disorder on the Fe sublattice. The panels relate the macroscopic stability to its microscopic electronic drivers across the transition from hole-doped (Mn, left) to electron￾doped (Co, right) regim…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references

  1. [30]

    Pitfalls of exchange- correlation functionals in description of magnetism: Cautionary tale of the ferh alloy.Computational Materials Science, 248:113561, feb 2025

    Shishir Kumar Pandey, Saikat Debnath, Zhanghao Zhouyin, and Qiangqiang Gu. Pitfalls of exchange- correlation functionals in description of magnetism: Cautionary tale of the ferh alloy.Computational Materials Science, 248:113561, feb 2025

    2025

  2. [1]

    I. A. Dolgikh, T. G. H. Blank, A. G. Buzdakov, G. Li, K. H. Prabhakara, S. K. K. Patel, R. Medapalli, E. E. Fullerton, O. V. Koplak, J. H. Mentink, K. A. Zvezdin, A. K. Zvezdin, P. C. M. Christianen, and A. V. Kimel. Ultrafast emergence of ferromagnetism in antiferromagnetic FeRh in high magnetic fields. npj Spintronics, 3(1), feb 2025

    2025

  3. [2]

    Prashant Singh, Tyler Del Rose, Andriy Palasyuk, and Yaroslav Mudryk. Physics-informed machine- learning prediction of Curie temperatures and its promise for guiding the discovery of functional mag- netic materials.Chemistry of Materials, 35(16):6304–6312, 2023

    2023

  4. [3]

    Peresypkin, Radel R

    Egor Rumiantsev, Kuzma Khrabrov, Artem Tsypin, Nikita D. Peresypkin, Radel R. Gimaev, Vladimir Zverev, Roman Eremin, and Artur Kadurin. Doping position estimation for ferh-based alloys.Scientific Reports, 14(1), sep 2024

    2024

  5. [4]

    The nature of the interatomic forces in metals.Physical Review, 54(11):899–904, 1938

    Linus Pauling. The nature of the interatomic forces in metals.Physical Review, 54(11):899–904, 1938

    1938

  6. [5]

    J. C. Slater. The ferromagnetism of nickel.Physical Review, 49(7):537–545, 1936

    1936

  7. [6]

    Galanakis, P

    I. Galanakis, P. H. Dederichs, and N. Papanikolaou. Slater-Pauling behavior and origin of the half- metallicity of the full-Heusler alloys.Physical Review B, 66(17):174429, 2002. 15

    2002

  8. [7]

    Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000

    Jürgen Kübler.Theory of Itinerant Electron Magnetism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000

    2000

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    A. I. Liechtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, V. P. Antropov, and V. A. Gubanov. Local spin density func- tional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 67:65–74, 1987

    1987

  2. [9]

    Skomski.Simple Models of Magnetism

    R. Skomski.Simple Models of Magnetism. Oxford University Press, 2008

    2008

  3. [10]

    El-Bahy, Akif Safeen, Safaa N

    Hayat Ullah, Sadia Yasin, Kashif Safeen, Adeel Younus, Zeinhom M. El-Bahy, Akif Safeen, Safaa N. Abdou, and Mohamed M. Ibrahim. First principle study of scandium-based novel ternary half heusler ScXGe (X = Mn and Fe) alloys: insight into the spin-polarized structural, electron...

    2024

  4. [11]

    Tuning electronic and magnetic properties of FeRh alloy by chemical and physical method.Pramana, 7 2023

    R Greeshma and Rudra Banerjee. Tuning electronic and magnetic properties of FeRh alloy by chemical and physical method.Pramana, 7 2023

    2023

  5. [12]

    J. S. Kouvel and C. C. Hartelius. Anomalous magnetic moments and transformations in the ordered alloy ferh.Journal of Applied Physics, 33:1343–1344, 1962

    1962

  6. [13]

    Kudrnovsky, V

    J. Kudrnovsky, V. Drchal, and I. Turek. Physical properties of FeRh alloys: The antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic transition.Physical Review B, 91:014435, 2015

    2015

  7. [14]

    Polesya, S

    S. Polesya, S. Mankovsky, D. Kodderitzsch, J. Minar, and H. Ebert. Finite-temperature magnetism of FeRh compounds.Physical Review B, 93:024423, 2016

    2016

  8. [15]

    S. A. Nikitin, G. Myalikgulyev, A. M. Tishin, M. P. Annaorazov, K. A. Asatryan, and A. L. Tyurin. The magnetocaloric effect in Fe49Rh51 compound.Physics Letters A, 148(6–7):363–366, 1990

    1990

  9. [16]

    M. P. Annaorazov, S. A. Nikitin, A. L. Tyurin, K. A. Asatryan, and A. Kh. Dovletov. Anomalously high entropy change in FeRh alloy.Journal of Applied Physics, 79(3):1689–1695, 1996

    1996

  10. [17]

    Marti, I

    X. Marti, I. Fina, C. Frontera, Jian Liu, P. Wadley, Q. He, R. J. Paull, J. D. Clarkson, J. Kudrnovský, I. Turek, J. Kuneš, D. Yi, J.-H. Chu, C. T. Nelson, L. You, E. Arenholz, S. Salber, J. Fontcuberta, T. Jungwirth, and R.Ramesh. Room-temperature antiferromagnetic memoryresi...

    2014

  11. [18]

    Y. Teraoka. Magnetism of transition metal thin films with a nearly half-filled d band.Vacuum, 41:1201– 1203, 1990

    1990

  12. [19]

    C. C. Kuo, S. F. Chuang, W. Pan, W. C. Lin, and M. T. Lin. Comparative study of the d-band filling effect on the magnetic behavior of CoxNi1–x and FexNi1–x ultrathin films on Cu(100).Journal of Applied Physics, 91:7185, 2002

    2002

  13. [20]

    Nadig, Satish Yadav, Suman Karmakar, and R

    Rajeev Joshi, Pramod R. Nadig, Satish Yadav, Suman Karmakar, and R. Rawat. Effect of mn substitu- tion on first order antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic phase transition and magnetocaloric effect in FeRh. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 629:173217, 2025

    2025

  14. [21]

    Coherent-potential model of substitutional disordered alloys.Phys

    Paul Soven. Coherent-potential model of substitutional disordered alloys.Phys. Rev., 156:809–813, Apr 1967. 16

    1967

  15. [22]

    Hung-Lung Huang, Jen-Chuan Tung, and Horng-Tay Jeng. A first-principles study on the effect of Cr, Mn, and Co substitution on Fe-based normal- and inverse-heusler compounds: Fe3–x YxZ (x=0, 1, 2, 3; Y–– Cr,Mn,Co; Z ––Al,Ga,Si).Frontiers in Physics, 10, sep 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    Gul Rahman, In Gee Kim, H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, and Arthur J. Freeman. First-principles investiga- tion of magnetism and electronic structures of substitutional3dtransition-metal impurities in bcc Fe. Physical Review B, 81(18), may 2010

    2010

  17. [24]

    van Schilfgaarde and V

    M. van Schilfgaarde and V. P. Antropov. First-principles exchange interactions in fe, ni, and co.Journal of Applied Physics, 85(8):4827–4829, apr 1999

    1999

  18. [25]

    version 7.7

    The munich spr-kkr package, http://olimpio.physik.uni-ulm.de/packages/sprkkr, 2023. version 7.7

    2023

  19. [26]

    Calculating condensed matter properties using the KKR-green's function method—recent developments and applications.Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(9):096501, 8 2011

    H Ebert, D Ködderitzsch, and J Minár. Calculating condensed matter properties using the KKR-green's function method—recent developments and applications.Reports on Progress in Physics, 74(9):096501, 8 2011

    2011

  20. [27]

    Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof

    John P. Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Phys. Rev. Lett., 77:3865–3868, 10 1996

    1996

  21. [28]

    J. B. Staunton, R. Banerjee, M. dos Santos Dias, A. Deak, and L. Szunyogh. Fluctuating local moments, itinerant electrons, and the magnetocaloric effect: Compositional hypersensitivity of FeRh.Physical Review B, 89(5):054427, 2014

    2014

  22. [29]

    H. B. Tran, T. Fukushima, H. Momida, K. Sato, Y. Makino, and T. Oguchi. Direct and inverse magnetocaloric effects in FeRh alloy.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 926:166718, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Turek, J

    I. Turek, J. Kudrnovský, V. Drchal, and P. Bruno. Exchange interactions, spin waves, and transition temperatures in itinerant magnets.Philosophical Magazine, 86(12):1713–1752, apr 2006

    2006

  24. [32]

    Horký, J

    M. Horký, J. A. Arregi, S. K. K. Patel, M. Staňo, R. Medapalli, O. Caha, L. Vojáček, M. Horák, V. Uhlíř, and E. E. Fullerton. Controlling the metamagnetic phase transition in FeRh/MnRh superlattices and thin-film Fe50−xMnxRh50 alloys.ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 14(2):3...

    2022

  25. [33]

    Impact of co doping on the magnetic and transport properties of ferh.APL Materials, 12(12), dec 2024

    Sang-il Seo, Min-Tae Park, and Myung-Hwa Jung. Impact of co doping on the magnetic and transport properties of ferh.APL Materials, 12(12), dec 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Exchange interactions and spin-wave stiffness in ferromagnetic metals.Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics, 14(7):L125–L128, jul 1984

    A I Liechtenstein, M I Katsnelson, and V A Gubanov. Exchange interactions and spin-wave stiffness in ferromagnetic metals.Journal of Physics F: Metal Physics, 14(7):L125–L128, jul 1984

    1984

  27. [35]

    Asako Terasawa, Munehisa Matsumoto, Taisuke Ozaki, and Yoshihiro Gohda. Efficient algorithm based on liechtenstein method for computing exchange coupling constants using localized basis set.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 88(11):114706, nov 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Liechtenstein, M.I

    A.I. Liechtenstein, M.I. Katsnelson, V.P. Antropov, and V.A. Gubanov. Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys.Journal of Mag- netism and Magnetic Materials, 67(1):65–74, may 1987. 17

    1987

  29. [37]

    Gruner, Richard A

    Ralf Witte, Robert Kruk, Markus E. Gruner, Richard A. Brand, Di Wang, Sabine Schlabach, An- dre Beck, Virgil Provenzano, Rossitza Pentcheva, Heiko Wende, and Horst Hahn. Tailoring magnetic frustration in strained epitaxial FeRh films.Physical Review B, 93(10), mar 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    V. V. Sokolovskiy, V. D. Buchelnikov, M. A. Zagrebin, P. Entel, S. Sahoo, and M. Ogura. First-principles investigation of chemical and structural disorder in magnetic Ni2Mn1+xSn1−x heusler alloys.Phys. Rev. B, 86:134418, Oct 2012

    2012

  31. [39]

    I. A. Zhuravlev, V. P. Antropov, and K. D. Belashchenko. Spin-fluctuation mechanism of anomalous temperature dependence of magnetocrystalline anisotropy in itinerant magnets.Physical Review Letters, 115(21), nov 2015

    2015

  32. [40]

    Springer, 2006

    Peter Mohn.Magnetism in the Solid State. Springer, 2006

    2006

  33. [41]

    Karunakaran and Rudra Banerjee

    M. Karunakaran and Rudra Banerjee. Doping-induced enhancement of curie temperature in Zn2Ru1–x AxMn (A=Ti, Mn, Co, Zr, and Rh) heusler alloys: Anab-initioinvestigation.Applied Physics Letters, 126(2), jan 2025

    2025

  34. [42]

    Itinerant electron magnetism.Annual Review of Materials Science, 14:397–419, 1984

    Tetsuo Moriya. Itinerant electron magnetism.Annual Review of Materials Science, 14:397–419, 1984

    1984

  35. [43]

    P. J. Ryan, J-W Kim, T. Birol, P. Thompson, J-H. Lee, X. Ke, P. S. Normile, E. Karapetrova, P. Schiffer, S. D. Brown, C. J. Fennie, and D. G. Schlom. Reversible control of magnetic interactions by electric field in a single-phase material.Nature Communications, 4(1), jan 2013

    2013

  36. [44]

    Hume-Rothery.The Structure of Metals and Alloys

    W. Hume-Rothery.The Structure of Metals and Alloys. Institute of Metals, Monograph and Report Series. Chemical Publishing Company, 1939

    1939

  37. [45]

    Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2010

    Uichiro Mizutani.The Hume-Rothery Rules for Alloy Chemistry and Electron Density in Metals. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Mahat, U

    R. Mahat, U. Karki, Shambhu KC, J. Y. Law, V. Franco, I. Galanakis, A. Gupta, and P. LeClair. Effect of mixing the low-valence transition metal atoms Y = Co,Fe,Mn,Cr,V,Ti, or Sc in the quaternary heusler alloys Co2MnGa1−xYx.Physical Review Materials, 6(6), jun 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Gaonkar, E.T

    V.N. Gaonkar, E.T. Dias, A.K. Nigam, and K.R. Priolkar. d band filling and magnetic phase separation in transition metal-doped mn3snc.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 829:154548, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    Şaşıoğlu, W

    E. Şaşıoğlu, W. Beida, S. Ghosh, M. Tas, B. Sanyal, S. Lounis, S. Blügel, I. Mertig, and I. Galanakis. Itinerant versus localized magnetism in spin-gapped metallic half-heusler compounds: Stoner criterion and magnetic interactions.Phys. Rev. B, 112:184420, Nov 2025. 18

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.